- Open Access
- Total Downloads : 1213
- Authors : Manish S. Lande, Roshan D. Bhagat
- Paper ID : IJERTV2IS120527
- Volume & Issue : Volume 02, Issue 12 (December 2013)
- Published (First Online): 28-12-2013
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Thermal Analysis of Combustion Chamber of Two Stroke SI Engine
Manish S. Lande1 Roshan D.Bhagat2
Assistant Professor Assistant Professor
Mechanical Engg.Department Mechanical Engg.Department
College of Engg.And Tech.Akola College of Engg.And Tech.Akola
S.G.B.A.University Amravati. S.G.B.A.University Amravati.
ABSTRACT:-
Cylinder is the heart of internal combustion engine as combustion takes place inside the cylinder large amount of heat is produce inside the cylinder due to that heat distortion of cylinder wall May takes place. Due to inadequate heat transfer through the engine cylinder block the engine cylinder gets overheated, lead to knocking and some time result into structural failure. This also causes an increase in the thermal stresses in the liner wall which ultimately affects the strength of liner wall. The main objective of this project is to carry out thermal analysis of combustion chamber (Liner, piston,) in Ansys10 to predict temperature distribution across the combustion chamber of scavenged engine. For the analysis purpose firstly we modeling the liner and piston in Pro/E wildfire 4.0 and analyzed the temperature distribution in Ansys 10.
1. 1INTRODUCTION
Heat transfer is a very wide field used in analysis of internal combustion engine heat transfer effect parameter such as performance, emission and also efficiency. It is said that for a given mass of fuel higher the heat transfer to the combustion wall will reduce the average combustion pressure and temperature, this indirectly reduces the work done by the piston per cycle and these effects the specific power.
Temperature rise of the engine parts may cause a serious durability of the engine. The shape of isothermal lines and high temperature regions become more important in these studies. The experimental way will find these regions are costly and time consuming; Analytical methods are almost equally good for fast conformation of this region by using finite elements
Measuring the actual dimension of various components of two-stroke S.I engine (Bajaj bravo, 150cc). modeling of piston, liner along with combustion chamber are done using Pro/E wildfire4.0,then by using Ansys 10 we analyzed the temperature distribution and thermal stresses on above component, compare that thermal stresses with theoretically calculated thermal stresses.
-
1 AIM AND OBJECTIVE:-
Aim: –
The main objective of this project is to carry out thermal analysis of combustion chamber in Ansys to predict temperature distribution across the liner wall and piston of two strokes SI engine also find out the thermal stresses.
Objective:-
-
Modeling of liner and piston in pro/E; wildfire 4.0
-
Performance evaluation of 150cc, two stroke SI engine with and without scavenging process.
-
Find out the theoretical thermal stresses in liner and compare which found out by software.
-
Analyze the heat distribution across the assembly of piston and liner considering both temperatures with and without scavenging with the help of ANSYS 10 software.
-
-
FACTOR AFFECTING HEAT TRANSFER IN ENGINE
It may be noted that the engine heat transfer depended upon parameter. Unless the effect of this parameter is known, the design of a proper cooling system will be difficult.
-
Fuel-air ratio:-
A change in fuel-air ratio will change the temperature of the cylinder gases and affect the flame speed. The maximum gas temperature will occurs at an equivalence ratio of about 1.12 i.e., at a fuel-air ratio about
0.075. At this a fuel-air ratio Twill be a maximum .However, from experimental observations the maximum heat rejection is found to occur for a maximum, slightly leaner than this value.
-
Compression ratio:-
An increase in compression ratio causes only a slight increase in gas temperature near the top dead centre; but, because of greater expansion of the gases, there will be a considerable reduction in gas temperature near bottom dead centre where a large cylinder wall is exposed. The exhaust gas temperature will also be much lower because of greater expansion so that heat rejected during blow down will be less. In general, as compression ratio increase their tend to be a marginal reduction in heat rejection.
-
Spark advance:-
A spark advances more than the optimum as well as less than the optimum will result in increased heat rejection to the cooling system. This is mainly due to the fact that the spark timing other then MBT value (minimum spark advance for best torque) will reduce the power output and thereby more heat is rejected.
-
Engine output:-
Engines which are designed for high mean effective pressure or high piston speeds, heat rejection will be less. Less heat will be lost for the same indicated power in large engine.
-
Speeds and loads:-
Prediction of spark ignition engine heat transfer as a function of speed and load. The cycle heat transfer is expressed as a percent of fuels chemical energy. The relative importance is of heat losses per cycle decrease as speed and load increase: the average heat transfer per unit time, however, increased as speed and load increase.
-
Spark timing:-
Retarding the spark timing in as SI engine decreases the heat flux. The burned gas temperature is decreased as timing is retarded because combustion occurs latter when the cylinder volume is larger. Temperature trends vary component. Piston and spark plug electrode temperature change most with timing variation; exhaust wall temperature increases as timing as retarded due to higher exhausting gas temperature.
-
Inlet temperature:-
The heat flux increases linearly with increases inlet temperature. The gas temperature throughout the cycle is increased. An increase of 100K gives a 13 percent increases in heat flux.
-
Cylinder gas temperature:-
The average cylinder gas temperature is much higher in comparison to the cylinder wall temperature. Hence, any marginal change in cylinder gas temperature will have very little effect on the temperature difference and thus on heat rejection.
.
2.1 MAXIMUM TEMPERATURE INSIDE COMBUSTION CHAMBER
Given Data:-
Compression ratio (r) = 8 , Room Temp. (T1) = 300 k., Ratio of specific heat () = 1.4 r = (T3 /T1 )1/2.(-1)
T3 / T1 = (r)2.(-1)
T3 = T1 × (r)2.(-1)
= 300 × (8)2(1.4-1)
= 300 × (5.27)
= 1581k.
T3 = 1308c.
It is the highest temperature inside the engine.
From the above derivation we find out the maximum temperature inside the combustion chamber, at speed 5500 rpm. Here we consider the compression ratio 8 and at room temperature 300k.
-
2 EXPEIMENTAL SETUP AND CALCULATION Engine Specification under Study
-
Type 2-stroke 5-ports single cylinder S.I engine
-
Cooling Air cooled
-
Bore ¢ 57 mm
-
Stroke 54 mm
-
Displacement 145.5cc
-
Compression ratio 8
-
Connecting rod length 105mm
-
Maximum engine output 5.9kw@5500rpm
-
Fig. 2.1 Experimental setup.
LEGENDS
-
Engine Frame, 2-Crank Case, 3-Caburetor, 4-Air Box, 5-Fuel Tank, 6-Burrete, 7-Exhaust Of Engine, 8-PUC Machine Setup, 9-Rope Brake Dynamometer, 10-Air Box Stand, 11-Machine Stand, 12-Hole Provided For Direct Air Injection, 13-Tachometer
-
Test Procedures
-
Start the ngine by cranking the kick provided for cranking.
-
Adjust the burret level up to 25ml.
-
Then close the tank fuel valve and open burette valve & measure the fuel consumption for 10 sec with the help of stopwatch. .
-
Note down the speed of engine by the tachometer.
-
Note down the manometric reading from u-tube manometer.
-
-
Reading:-
Sr.no.
Speed (r.p.m.)
Manometric reading(H) (cm)
Mass of fuel(ml)
Time(sec.)
Velocity (m/s)
1
1160
8
0.9
10
36.62
2
1300
9
1
10
38.84
3
1600
13
1.2
10
46.49
4
2000
16
1.5
10
51.79
5
2750
20
1.7
10
57.91
-
Table 2.1 Readings with scavenging
Sr.no
Speed (r.p.m.)
Manometric reading(H) (mm)
Mass of fuel(ml)
Time(sec.)
Velocity (m/s)
1
1000
6
1
10
10.03
2
1550
8
1.4
10
11.58
3
1700
12
1.9
10
14.18
4
2100
20
2.3
10
18.31
5
2400
28
2.8
10
21.66
-
-
Where,
-
Table 2.2 Readings without scavenging
-
V= 2gh
-
-
V= velocity of air, g = acceleration due to gravity, h= manometric head
-
When considering the readings with direct injection of air and without direct injection of air, there is a difference in fuel consumption rate. The velocity of air is increased in direct air injection mean there is better burning of fuel are take place due to the better burning of fuel temperature inside the combustion chamber has been increased. We considering the 50c increased in temperature with direct injection of air
3] CALCULATION
3.1] Theoretical Thermal Stresses.
Whenever there is some increase or decrease in the temperature of a body, it causes the body to expand or contract. A little consideration will show that if the body is allowed to expand or contract freely, with the rise or fall of the temperature, no stresses are induced in the body. But, if the deformation of the body is prevented, some stresses are induced in the body. Such stresses are known as thermal stresses.
Let
l = Original length of the body, t = Rise or fall of temperature, and = Coefficient of thermal expansion, Increase or decrease in length,
l = l. . t
If the ends of the body are fixed to rigid supports, so that its expansion is prevented, then compressive strain induced in the body,
Therefore
c = l / l
= l. . t/ l
= . t
Thermal stress, th = c .E
= . t. E
-
Thermal Stresses For Without Scavenging:-
Given data;-
l = 0.124m, t = 12810k, = 23.3×10-6 /0c, E = 2×1011 N/m2
Increase or decrease in length,
l = l. . t
= 0.124× 23.3×10-6 × 1281
= 0.00365 m
c = l / l
= 0.00365/0.124
= 0.0294
Thermal stress, th = c .E
= 0.02796 × 2×1011
= 0.58 × 1010 N/m2
-
Thermal Stresses For With Scavenging:-
-
Given data;- l = 0.124m, t = 13310k, = 23.3×10-6 /0c , E = 2×1011 N/m2 Increase or decrease in length,
l = l. . t
= 0.124 × 23.3×10-6 × 1331
= 0.00384 m
c = l / l
= 0.00384/0.124
= 0.0310
Thermal stress, th = c E
= 0.0291 × 2×1011
= 0.62×1010 N/m2.
3.2 Thermal Stresses from Analysis
Fig. 3.1 Thermal Stresses on color scale.
Fig. 3.1 Thermal Stresses on color scale by zoomed view.
The theoretical thermal stresses and by using software ansys10 are nearly equal.
-
3 Material Properties:
SR.NO
PART
MATERIAL
THERMAL COMDUCTIVITY
DENSITY(kg/m³)
1
PISTON
CAST IRON
60 (W/m °k)
7200
2
PISTON RING
HIGH SPEED STEEL
54 (W/m °k)
7750
3
LINER
CAST IRON
60 (W/m °k)
7200
4
PISTON
ALUMINIUM
225( W/m °k)
2750
Table 3.1: Material Properties
-
GEOMETRY DEFINITION OF ASSEMBLY
A 3D model of engine (liner, piston, and combustion chamber) has been drawn using CAD software pro/E; wildfire 3.0 as shown in the figure.
Fig 4.1 Assembly in ansys window
This model have very complicated shape, therefore it always difficult to mesh and there is lot of geometry loss take place when importing it to the analysis software ANSYS from different CAD software i.e. As an IGES file format. Our results do not match with realistic model due to element shape quality therefore it is necessary to simplify the model in ANSYS for maintaining the element shape quality as well as controlling the number of element for reducing the time for analysis figure shows the simplified (liner, piston, and combustion chamber) model in ANSYS.
4. 1 BOUNDARY CONDITION AT THE COMBUSTION CHAMBER
A variety of thermal boundary conditions is necessary to complete the application of FEM models for the prediction of temperature and heat flux distribution on engine structure. Since the application of these conditions introduce a factor of uncertainty on to the final results, a detailed knowledge of physical mechanisms become essential. For our model we used three boundary conditions, first condition is applied inside the combustion chamber and top of the piston, when the position of piston is 8 after TDC.The temperature applied at that condition is 1581 k for without direct injection which is calculated in. earlier. And for direct injection we assume temperature increased 50c .The second boundary condition is applied at piston skirt, the temperature applied at that condition which is to be assume is 423k .And third boundary condition is applied at bottom of liner which is to be at 300 k. Also on piston ring 1000k temperature is applied. There are some assumption are made like, Effect of piston motion on the heat transfer is neglected. The ring does not twist.
-
2 TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION IN ASSEMBLY
Result from the ANSYS program gives us a temperature distribution of engine liner. To review this result general post processor has been used. Post processor enables to review results at one time step over the entire model.
-
Temperature Distribution Considering Without Scavenging For C.I
Fig. 4.2 Temperature distribution for CI
The above figure shows temperature distribution from higher temperature to lower temperature ranging between 1581 to 3000k. The distribution of temperature on assembly shown by various color. Various ports affect the temperature distribution on assembly.
-
Temperature Distriution Considering With Scavenging For C.I
Fig .4.3 Temperature distribution for CI
-
Temperature Distribution Considering Without Scavenging For Aluminium
Fig.4. 4 Temperature distribution for Al
-
Temperature Distribution Considering With Scavenging For Aluminium
-
Fig. 4.5 Temperature distribution in Al
From the analysis we find out that the heat distribution in aluminium piston is better than cast iron due to its high thermal conductivity. Hence it increases the heat transfer rate and it can reduce the tendency of knocking.
4. 3 NODAL TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION
TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION ON EACH NODE WITHOUT SCAVENGING ON PISTON FOR CI
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
|||||
391 |
1003.2 |
414 |
1000.5 |
437 |
995.95 |
460 |
1014.7 |
483 |
1145.1 |
392 |
1005.4 |
415 |
999.85 |
438 |
995.80 |
461 |
1027.6 |
484 |
1153.4 |
393 |
1009.7 |
416 |
999.24 |
439 |
995.67 |
462 |
1044.8 |
485 |
1155.0 |
394 |
1015.3 |
417 |
999.03 |
440 |
995.58 |
463 |
1059.0 |
486 |
1148.1 |
395 |
1021.9 |
418 |
998.57 |
441 |
995.41 |
464 |
1078.3 |
487 |
1154.3 |
396 |
1034.1 |
419 |
998.30 |
442 |
995.28 |
465 |
1082.4 |
488 |
1156.7 |
397 |
1049.1 |
420 |
998.08 |
443 |
994.92 |
466 |
1084.5 |
489 |
1154.1 |
398 |
1072.0 |
421 |
997.83 |
444 |
994.79 |
467 |
1201.6 |
490 |
1148.0 |
399 |
1075.4 |
422 |
997.57 |
445 |
994.64 |
468 |
1185.3 |
491 |
1158.3 |
400 |
1076.9 |
423 |
997.25 |
446 |
994.67 |
469 |
1172.5 |
492 |
1156.7 |
401 |
1065.3 |
424 |
997.10 |
447 |
994.69 |
470 |
1156.9 |
493 |
1156.0 |
402 |
1050.5 |
425 |
997.06 |
448 |
994.90 |
471 |
1154.0 |
494 |
1152.9 |
403 |
1033.4 |
426 |
997.04 |
449 |
995.05 |
472 |
1145.7 |
495 |
1165.3 |
404 |
1022.5 |
427 |
996.79 |
450 |
995.64 |
473 |
1153.6 |
496 |
1166.9 |
405 |
1016.2 |
428 |
996.77 |
451 |
996.10 |
474 |
1153.8 |
497 |
1164.8 |
406 |
1011.6 |
429 |
996.64 |
452 |
996.64 |
475 |
1150.6 |
498 |
1152.7 |
407 |
1008.6 |
430 |
996.42 |
453 |
997.44 |
476 |
1137.1 |
499 |
1155.1 |
408 |
1006.7 |
431 |
996.47 |
454 |
998.39 |
477 |
1149.1 |
500 |
1156.5 |
409 |
1004.7 |
432 |
996.45 |
455 |
999.70 |
478 |
1155.1 |
501 |
1158.0 |
410 |
1003.0 |
433 |
996.22 |
456 |
1001.2 |
479 |
1156.8 |
503 |
1153.7 |
411 |
1002.3 |
434 |
995.86 |
457 |
1003.5 |
480 |
1153.0 |
504 |
1152.0 |
412 |
1001.6 |
435 |
995.96 |
458 |
1006.4 |
481 |
1142.5 |
505 |
1151.1 |
413 |
1000.9 |
436 |
995.97 |
459 |
1010.3 |
482 |
1131.0 |
506 |
1150.0 |
TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION ON EACH NODE WITHOUT SCAVENGING ON PISTON FOR ALUMINIUM
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
|||||
391 |
1427.9 |
414 |
1450.8 |
437 |
1444.9 |
460 |
1419.3 |
483 |
1531.3 |
392 |
1427.1 |
415 |
1451.4 |
438 |
1444.2 |
461 |
1418.3 |
484 |
1532.0 |
393 |
1426.6 |
416 |
1451.6 |
439 |
1443.3 |
462 |
1417.5 |
485 |
1532.0 |
394 |
1426.2 |
417 |
1451.7 |
440 |
1442.7 |
463 |
1418.1 |
486 |
1531.8 |
395 |
1425.9 |
418 |
1451.6 |
441 |
1441.3 |
464 |
1454.4 |
487 |
1532.6 |
396 |
1425.8 |
419 |
1451.9 |
442 |
1440.6 |
465 |
1452.4 |
488 |
1532.4 |
397 |
1425.4 |
420 |
1452.2 |
443 |
1437.2 |
466 |
1450.3 |
489 |
1531.9 |
398 |
1424.5 |
421 |
1451.4 |
444 |
1435.0 |
467 |
1532.1 |
490 |
1531.1 |
399 |
1421.8 |
422 |
1451.3 |
445 |
1435.2 |
468 |
1532.2 |
491 |
1531.9 |
400 |
1419.2 |
423 |
1451.2 |
446 |
1435.3 |
469 |
1532.1 |
492 |
1531.8 |
401 |
1449.7 |
424 |
1450.5 |
447 |
1432.6 |
470 |
1531.4 |
493 |
1531.6 |
402 |
1449.5 |
425 |
1450.6 |
448 |
1430.2 |
471 |
1531.6 |
494 |
1531.1 |
403 |
1449.7 |
426 |
1450.3 |
449 |
1430.0 |
472 |
1530.9 |
495 |
1531.7 |
404 |
1449.7 |
427 |
1450.1 |
450 |
1429.5 |
473 |
1531.7 |
496 |
1531.7 |
405 |
1449.6 |
428 |
1449.4 |
451 |
1428.2 |
474 |
1531.9 |
497 |
1531.4 |
406 |
1449.7 |
429 |
1448.7 |
452 |
1427.1 |
475 |
1531.8 |
498 |
1530.3 |
407 |
1449.9 |
430 |
1447.8 |
453 |
1425.6 |
476 |
1530.5 |
499 |
1530.6 |
408 |
1449.6 |
431 |
1447.7 |
454 |
1424.5 |
477 |
1531.6 |
500 |
1530.6 |
409 |
1450.3 |
432 |
1447.4 |
455 |
1423.2 |
478 |
1532.1 |
501 |
1530.3 |
410 |
1450.5 |
433 |
1446.6 |
456 |
1421.1 |
479 |
1532.3 |
502 |
1529.3 |
411 |
1450.9 |
434 |
1445.3 |
457 |
1421.0 |
480 |
1532.0 |
503 |
1529.6 |
412 |
1451.2 |
435 |
1445.6 |
458 |
1421.3 |
481 |
1531.1 |
504 |
1529.5 |
413 |
1451.2 |
436 |
1445.6 |
459 |
1419.9 |
482 |
1529.8 |
505 |
1529.1 |
TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION WITH SCAVENGING ON PISTON FOR C.I.
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
|||||
391 |
1464.1 |
414 |
1489.1 |
437 |
1482.7 |
460 |
1454.7 |
483 |
1576.8 |
392 |
1463.3 |
415 |
1489.7 |
438 |
1481.8 |
461 |
1453.6 |
484 |
1577.6 |
393 |
1462.6 |
416 |
1489.9 |
439 |
1480.9 |
462 |
1452.7 |
485 |
1577.5 |
394 |
1462.2 |
417 |
1490.0 |
440 |
1480.2 |
463 |
1453.4 |
486 |
1577.3 |
395 |
1461.9 |
418 |
1489.9 |
441 |
1478.7 |
464 |
1493.0 |
487 |
1578.2 |
396 |
1461.8 |
419 |
1490.3 |
442 |
1477.9 |
465 |
1490.7 |
488 |
1578.0 |
397 |
1461.4 |
420 |
1490.6 |
443 |
1474.2 |
466 |
1488.5 |
489 |
1577.5 |
398 |
1460.4 |
421 |
1489.7 |
444 |
1471.9 |
467 |
1577.7 |
490 |
1576.6 |
399 |
1457.5 |
422 |
1489.6 |
445 |
1472.0 |
468 |
1577.7 |
491 |
1577.5 |
400 |
1454.6 |
423 |
1489.5 |
446 |
1472.1 |
469 |
1577.7 |
492 |
1577.4 |
401 |
1487.8 |
424 |
1488.8 |
447 |
1469.2 |
470 |
1576.9 |
493 |
1577.2 |
402 |
1487.6 |
425 |
1488.8 |
448 |
1466.6 |
471 |
1577.1 |
494 |
1576.6 |
403 |
1487.8 |
426 |
1488.5 |
449 |
1466.4 |
472 |
1576.4 |
495 |
1577.3 |
404 |
1487.8 |
427 |
1488.2 |
450 |
1465.8 |
473 |
1577.3 |
496 |
1577.2 |
405 |
1487.8 |
428 |
1487.5 |
451 |
1464.4 |
474 |
1577.5 |
497 |
1576.9 |
406 |
1487.9 |
429 |
1486.8 |
452 |
1463.2 |
475 |
1577.4 |
498 |
1575.7 |
407 |
1488.0 |
430 |
1485.8 |
453 |
1461.6 |
476 |
1576.0 |
499 |
1576.1 |
408 |
1487.7 |
431 |
1485.7 |
454 |
1460.4 |
477 |
1577.1 |
500 |
1576.0 |
409 |
1488.5 |
432 |
1485.4 |
455 |
1459.0 |
478 |
1577.7 |
501 |
1575.7 |
410 |
1488.7 |
433 |
1484.5 |
456 |
1456.6 |
479 |
1577.9 |
502 |
1574.6 |
411 |
1489.1 |
434 |
1483.1 |
457 |
1456.5 |
480 |
1577.6 |
503 |
1575.0 |
412 |
1489.5 |
435 |
1483.3 |
458 |
1456.9 |
481 |
1576.5 |
504 |
1574.8 |
413 |
1489.5 |
436 |
1483.4 |
459 |
1455.4 |
482 |
1575.2 |
505 |
1574.4 |
TEMPERATURE DISTRIBUTION WITH SCAVENGING ON PISTON FOR ALUMINIUM
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
NODE NUMBER AND TEMPERATURE |
|||||
391 |
1471.0 |
414 |
1494.9 |
437 |
1488.8 |
460 |
1462.0 |
483 |
1579.1 |
392 |
1470.2 |
415 |
1495.5 |
438 |
1488.0 |
461 |
1461.0 |
484 |
1579.8 |
393 |
1469.6 |
416 |
1495.7 |
439 |
1487.1 |
462 |
1460.1 |
485 |
1579.8 |
394 |
1469.2 |
417 |
1495.8 |
440 |
1486.5 |
463 |
1460.7 |
486 |
1579.5 |
395 |
1468.9 |
418 |
1495.7 |
441 |
1485.0 |
464 |
1498.7 |
487 |
1580.4 |
396 |
1468.8 |
419 |
1496.1 |
442 |
1484.3 |
465 |
1496.5 |
488 |
1580.2 |
397 |
1468.4 |
420 |
1496.4 |
443 |
1480.7 |
466 |
1494.4 |
489 |
1579.7 |
398 |
1467.4 |
421 |
1495.6 |
444 |
1478.4 |
467 |
1579.9 |
490 |
1578.9 |
399 |
1464.6 |
422 |
1495.4 |
445 |
1478.6 |
468 |
1579.9 |
491 |
1579.7 |
400 |
1461.9 |
423 |
1495.4 |
446 |
1478.7 |
469 |
1579.9 |
492 |
1579.6 |
401 |
1493.7 |
424 |
1494.7 |
447 |
1475.9 |
470 |
1579.1 |
493 |
1579.4 |
402 |
1493.5 |
425 |
1494.7 |
448 |
1473.4 |
471 |
1579.4 |
494 |
1578.8 |
403 |
1493.7 |
426 |
1494.4 |
449 |
1473.2 |
472 |
1578.7 |
495 |
1579.5 |
404 |
1493.8 |
427 |
1494.1 |
450 |
1472.6 |
473 |
1579.5 |
496 |
1579.5 |
405 |
1493.7 |
428 |
1493.4 |
451 |
1471.3 |
474 |
1579.7 |
497 |
1579.1 |
406 |
1493.8 |
429 |
1492.7 |
452 |
1470.1 |
475 |
1579.6 |
498 |
1578.0 |
407 |
1493.9 |
430 |
1491.8 |
453 |
1468.6 |
476 |
1578.3 |
499 |
1578.4 |
408 |
1493.6 |
431 |
1491.7 |
454 |
1467.4 |
477 |
1579.4 |
500 |
1578.3 |
409 |
1494.4 |
432 |
1491.4 |
455 |
1466.1 |
478 |
1579.9 |
501 |
1578.0 |
410 |
1494.6 |
433 |
1490.6 |
456 |
1463.8 |
479 |
1580.1 |
502 |
1577.0 |
411 |
1495.0 |
434 |
1489.2 |
457 |
1463.7 |
480 |
1579.8 |
503 |
1577.3 |
412 |
1495.3 |
435 |
1489.4 |
458 |
1464.1 |
481 |
1578.8 |
504 |
1577.2 |
413 |
1495.4 |
436 |
1489.5 |
459 |
1462.6 |
482 |
1577.5 |
505 |
1576.8 |
CONCLUSION
The thermal stresses which are found in Ansys software are nearly equal to theoretical thermal stresses. The value of thermal stresses is th = 0.62×1010 N/m2.and according to material property of engines its safe. The ports present on the liner affect the temperature distribution across the liner body due to the reduction of area. The nodal temperature distribution table shows there is proportionality variation in nodal temperature for with and without scavenging. The temperature distribution in case of cast iron and aluminum piston show the variation due to the thermal conductivity difference, means aluminum piston are able to better heat distribution so we can say that aluminum piston gives better heat transfer than cast iron piston so it can reduced tendency of knocking.
REFERENCES
1] Rosli abu bakar, devarajan ramasamy chiew chen wee Heat transfer in the cylinder of a new two stroke cross scavenged engine,Malaysia.
2] H.K.D.H Bhadeshia Thermal analysis techniques University of Cambridge,material science and metallurgy.
3] V.Esfahanian,A.Javaheri and M.Ghaffarpour Thermal analysis of an S.I. engine. Using different combustion boundary condition treatment. United States (2005)
4] Qiang Du and Desheng Wang, Tetrahedral mesh generation and optimization based on centroidal voronoi tessellations PA 16802,U.S.A.
5] Mario Hirz; Tanja Goeber; Michal Ludwig; Michael Lang; Roland Kirchberger; Wolfgang Hirschberg. Design and Development of a 50 Cc Scooter Frame Supported By Testing and Simulation. SAE International, Dated- October 2005.
6] M.Ayaz Afsar, Experimental Investigation of direct air injection scavenged two strokk engine. Proceedings of 2009 International Symposium on Computing communication and control, Singapore. ISBN 978-1-84626.
7] Ibrahim, Semin ,Rosli Abu Bakar.In-cylinder mass flow rate and gas species concentration simulation of S.I.engineISSN.1816-949X,2007,Malaysia.
8] V.Ganesan, Internal combustion engines second edition Tata McGraw Hill publication, New Delhi, 2005.pp.1-6.
9] M.L.Mathur and R.P.Sharma.Internal combustion engine Dhanpat Rai New Delhi 2007 pp.164 to 183 10] R.K. Rajput, Heat and Mass Transfer, third edition S.Chand publication, New Delhi, 2006.pp.11-16 11] R.K. Rajput, Thermal engineering, sixth edition Laxmi publication, New Delhi 2006, pp945-957.
12] R.S. Khurmi, Machine Design, S. Chand and company limited, New Delhi 2008, pp1132-1143.
13] O.P. Khanna, Materialscience and metallurgy, Dhanpat Rai publication, New Delhi 1998, pp5-6 to 5-20. 14] J.N. Reddy, Finite element method, Tata McGraw Hill publication, New Delhi, 2005 .pp.357 to 367.