- Open Access
- Total Downloads : 2462
- Authors : Labani Nandi, Prof. Priyabrata Guha
- Paper ID : IJERTV3IS031436
- Volume & Issue : Volume 03, Issue 03 (March 2014)
- Published (First Online): 01-04-2014
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Design Comparison of Different Structural Elements By using Different International Codes
Labani Nandi
M.Tech (Structural Engineering) Narula Institute of Technology Agarpara,Kol-109,W.B.,India
Prof. Priyabrata Guha Narula Institute of Technology Agarpara, Kol-109,W.B.,India
Abstract : – This paper is intended to compare the design of reinforced concrete structure with various International codes from economical point of view. Three different famous structural building codes have been adopted. These are the IS456:2000, BS8110:1985, and Euro Code2:1992. These codes have been compared in the strength design requirements of structural elements. The comparison include shear design.
Throughout this study elaborated design models and criteria of the considered codes have been exhibited. Although the principles contained in these codes are basically the same, they differ in details..
Keywords Different structural element like continuous slab,contineuous beam, column and column footing.
INTRODUCTION:
Engineering is a professional art of applying science to the efficient conversion of natural resources for the benefit of man. Engineering therefore requires above all creative imagination to innovative useful application for natural phenomenon.
THE DESIGN PROCESS:
The design process of structural planning and design requires not only imagination and conceptual thinking but also sound knowledge of science of structural engineering besides the knowledge of practical aspects, such as recent design codes, bye laws, backed up by sample experience, initiation and judgment. The purpose of standards is to ensure and enhance the safety, keeping careful balance between economy and safety.
The process of design commences with planning of the structure. primarily to meet its functional requirements. Initially, the requirements proposed by the client are taken into consideration. They may be vague, ambiguous or even unacceptable from engineering
point of view because he is not aware of the various implications involved in the process of planning and design, about the limitation and intricacies of structural science.
It is emphasized that any structure to be constructed must satisfy the need efficiently for which it is intended and shall be durable for its desired life span.
Thus, the design of any structure is categorized into the following two main types :-
-
Functional design
-
Structural design.
FUNCTIONAL DESIGN:
The structure to be constructed should be primarily serve the basic purpose for which it is to be used and must have a pleasing look.
STRUCTURAL DESIGN:
Structural design is an art and science of understanding the behavior of structural members subjected to loads and designing them with economy and elegance to give a safe, serviceable and durable.
STAGES IN STRUCTURAL DESIGN:
The process of structural design involves the following stages-
1.0 Structural planning.
2. 0 Action of forces and computation of loads.
3.0 Member analysis.
4.0 Member design.
5.0 Comparison between various RCC. Design code.
6.0 Detailing, drawing and preparation of schedules.
This paper is devoted to focus a spot of light on design the minimum or maximum area of steel
requirement for elements of concrete structure. Three different International Structural building codes are adopted in this study. These are: [1] IS 456:2000; [2] BS 8110:1985 and [3] EC2:1992 for the design of concrete structures.
-
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS:
-
As per IS Code:
L = Effective span d = Effective depth
Wd = Factored dead load Wl =Factored live load
Mu,lim = Limiting bending moment Pt = Percentage of steel
Vu = Shear force
tv = Nominal shear stress tc = Design shear strength Ld = Development length P = Spacing of stirrups
Pu = Ultimate load on column Ks = Co-efficient
bc = Short side of column section/Long side of column section
fck = Characteristic cube compressive strength of concrete
f y = Characteristic strength of steel
-
As per BS code:
M = Bending moment
calculating the effective span of a member
gk, Gk= characteristic permanent action
qk, Qk = characteristic variable action
fck = characteristic compressive cylinder strength of concrete at 28 days
fyk = characteristic yield strength of reinforcement
As = Area of tension reinforcement
AV = Area of shear reinforcement within a distance S Mu Factored IS,BS and EC Codes moment at section S: Spacing of stirrups
V = Nominal shear strength of section
Vc = Nominal shear strength provided by concrete VRd1 = EC2 concrete shear strength
-
-
UNITS:
Use either SI (MKS) or CGS as primary units. (SI units are encouraged.) English units may be used as secondary units (in parentheses).
-
EQUATIONS:
-
As per IS code:
Basic L/d = 26 [For continuous beam]
Basic L/d = 20 [For simply supported beam]
B.M. for end span:
WdL2/12 + WlL2/10 [B.M. at the centre of the end span] WdL2/10 + WlL2/9 B.M.[over penultimate support]
B.M. for intermediate span:
As = Area of steel
WdL2/16 + WlL2/12[B.M. at the centre of the span] W L2/12 + W L2/9 [B.M. over interior support]
S = Development length d l
Vs = Shear force
V = Nominal shear stress
Pu = Ultimate load on column
VEd = Design shear stress at the column perimeter
Mu,lim=0.138fckbd2
Pt = 50[1-{1-(4.6*Mu)/fck Vu = 0.6(Wd+Wl)L
tv = Vu/bd
bd2}½]/(fy/fck)
As = Cross sectional area of reinforcement
ASV = Cross-sectional area of shear reinforcement in the form of link
F = Ultimate load
Ld < 0.1.30(M1/Vu)+L0
p = (0.87fyAwd/Vus)
Pu = o.40fckAc + 0.67fyAsc
tv = Vu/b'd' [Nominal shear stress]
fy = Characteristic strength of reinforcement fcu = Characteristic concrete cube strength8+/
-
As per EC code:
MRd = Ultimate moment of resistance
K0 = Co-efficient of main reinforcement VRd,c = Design shear resistance of concrete b = width of section
d = effective depth of the tension reinforcement
h = overall depth of section Z = lever arm
A1, a2 = allowance at supports used for
b'd' dimension at the critical section of footing. ks = 0.5+bc
-
-
As per BS code: M = 0.086FL
As = M/ (0.87fyz) S (ft)/(4rfb) Smax = ft/2rfb
M = 0.09FL [Near middle of end span]
M = 0.11FL[At first interior support(-Ve Moment)] M = 0.07FL[At middle of interior spans]
M = 0.08FL [At interior supports(-Ve Moment)] As = 0.156fcubd2/(0.87fyz
Code
Actual grade of concrete
Considering grade of concrete
Actual grade of steel
Consideri ng grade of steel
IS 456:2000
M30
M30
Fe415
Fe415
BS8110: 1995
M30
M30
Fe460
Fe415
EC2:1992
M30
M30
Fe500
Fe415
Vs = 0.6F wu(support weidth/2)
V = Vs/bd < 0.8fcu½
Pu = 0.40fckAc + 0.67fyAsc
can be predicted, and the probability of particular load combinations occurring. Table (1)
Illustrates the values of partial factors of safety for the loaings, and a basic load combination Stipulated by the three codes [1, 2, 3].
Table (1) Basic Load Combinations and Partial Safety Factors (df) at the Ultimate Limit State :
Code
Dead Load (DL)
Live load (LL)
IS 456:2000
1.5
1.5
BS8110:1985
1.4
1.6
EC2:1992
1.35
1.5
-
As per Euro code:
Basic L/d = 31 MRd = 0.167fckbd2 As = M/0.87fykZ
Z = d[0.5+(0.25-3K0/3.4)1/2]
K0 = M/fckbd2
Ds = 5/8×fck×Areq/Aprov
Checked Basic L/d = K[11+1.5f
1/2(p /p)+3.2f
Table (1)
Dead Load (DL)
Live load (LL)
1.6
1.5
1.4
1.3
1.2
(p /p-
1)3/2]
As,max = 0.04Ac
As,min = 0.26fctmbtd/fyk
ck 0
ck 0
VRd,c = [CRd,cK(100P1fck)1/3+Kdcp]bwd VEd =ß(V1d/u0d) VRd,max = 0.5vfcd
V = 0.6[1-(fck/250)]
CRd,c = 0.18/dc K = 1+(200/d)½
P1 = (p1y p1x) =[As1,y/bd . AS1,x/bd]½ Vmin = 0.035K3/2f½
VRd,c =[ CRd,cK3/2+K1dcp]×[2d/a]
RESULT:
GRADE OF CONCRETE AND STEEL:
Table (2)
LOADING :
The three codes impose partial factors of safety for loads due to design assumptions and inaccuracy of calculation, possible unusual load increases, and constructional inaccuracies.
Design load = characteristic load* partial load factor of safety
The value of this factors of safety takes into account the importance of the limit state under Consideration and reflects to some extent the accuracy with which different types of loading
A.CALCULATING AREA OF STEEL WITH RESPECT TO ACTUAL GRADE OF CONCRETE AND STEEL:
Code |
SLAB [Ast] |
BEAM [Ast] |
COLUMN[ Ast] |
FOUNDATI ON[Ast] |
IS 456:2000 [M30 &Fe415] |
279 |
619.64 |
1240.37 |
1676.88 |
BS8110: 1995[M30& Fe460] |
203.41 |
583.88 |
1653.23 |
2080 |
EC2:1992 [M30&Fe50 0] |
269.57 |
743.17 |
1512 |
2080 |
Table (3)
2500
Code
2000
1500
SLAB
1000
BEAM
500
0
COLUMN[Ast]
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
B.CALCULATINGAREAOFSTEELWITH RESPECT TO CONSIDERIND GRADE OF CONCRETE AND STEEL:
Code |
SLAB [Ast] |
BEAM [Ast] |
COLUMN[ Ast] |
FOUNDATI ON[Ast] |
IS 456:2000 [M30 &Fe415] |
279 |
619.64 |
1240.37 |
1676.88 |
BS8110: 1995[M30& Fe415] |
225.47 |
647.12 |
1840.21 |
2080 |
EC2:1992 [M30&Fe41 5] |
324.78 |
895.39 |
1821.67 |
2080 |
SLAB
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0
Table (4)
FOUNDATION[
Ast]
CONCLUSION:
The main conclusions from this study can be summarized as follow:
[1]. Although the principles contained in the considered the grade of concrete is same for three codes differ in grade of steel. [2]. Calculating the area of steel with respect to actual grade of concrete and grade of steel. Result showing that--
For slab Area of steel is maximum as per IS code than BS and EC.
-
For beam Area of steel is maximum as per EC code than IS and BS.
-
For column Area of steel is maximum as per BS code than IS and BS.
-
For foundation Area of steel is minimum as per IS code than BS and EC.
-
For foundation with respect to EC code minimum steel are to be provided.
-
Increasing the area of steel of the all structural element with respect to actual grade of concrete and steel.
-
For foundation with respect to EC code minimum steel are to be provided.
REFERENCE:
-
Indian Standard PLAIN AND REINFORCED CONCRETE CODE OF PRACTICE.[IS 456:2000].
BEAM
COLUMN[Ast]
-
BS8110:1995 Structural Use of Concrete, Part 1, 2 British Standard Institute.
-
W. H., Mosley, R., Husle, and J. H., Bungey, Reinforced Concrete Design to Euro Code 2, Macmillan Press Ltd, 1996.
-
DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS CONCRETE,STEEL WORK,MASONRY AND TIMBER DESIGNS TO BRITISH STANDARD AND EUROCODES By Chanakya Araya.
-
DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURE By S. Ramamurtham.
-
DESIGN OF REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURE By Krishna raju.
-
Journal on Strength Design Requirements of ACI-318M-02 Code, BS8110, and EuroCode2 for Structural Concrete by Asst. Lect. Ali Abdul Hussein Jawad Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering Al-Mustansiriya University, Baghdad, Iraq
-
Mini project report on ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF COMPONENT REINFORCED CONCRETE STRUCTURE By DIVYA Kamath(08241A0113) & K.Vandana Reddy(08241A0155),Department of civil engineering, Gokaraju Rangaraju Institute and Technology, Bachupally,Hyderabad.
-
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING vol-2,No-3 2001 by Manish Varma, Umesh Pendharkar, Ravi K. Sharma.
- [10] Manual for design and detailing of RC code of practice for structural use of concrete 2004 by housing department may 2008(version 2.3).