- Open Access
- Total Downloads : 3924
- Authors : K. Venkateswara Rao, Dr. T. Dharmaraju
- Paper ID : IJERTV3IS10570
- Volume & Issue : Volume 03, Issue 01 (January 2014)
- Published (First Online): 18-01-2014
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Analysis of Wheel Rim Using Finite Element Method
K. Venkateswara Rao and Dr. T. Dharmaraju
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Godavari Institute of Engineering and Technology, Rajamundry
Abstract
The three dimensional model of the wheel was designed using CATIA. Then the IGES format 3D model was imported into ANSYS. In the present work a detailed static analysis – displacement, maximum and minimum vonmises stresses and fatigue analysis of wheel rim under radial loads has been done. The application of finite element method for analyzing stress distribution and fatigue life of wheel rim was summarized.
-
Intorduction
The rim of a wheel is the outer circular design of the metal on which the inside edge of the tire is mounted on vehicles such as automobiles. Analysis of wheel rim made with materials like alluminium alloy, steel alloy, forged steel and magnesium alloy is done for fatigue strength.
The finite element method is a powerful tool or the numerical procedure to obtain solutions to many of the problems encountered in engineering analysis. In this method of analysis, a complex region defining a continuum is discretized into simple geometric shapes called finite elements.The domain over which the analysis is studied is divided into a number of finite elements. The material properties and the governing relationship are considered over these elements and expressed in terms of unknown values at element corner.
In the static analysis of wheel rim constraints will be applied on the circumference of the rim.
Fatigue analysis is done in MSC fatigue software, uses stress or strain results from finite element (FE) models. Usage of MSC fatigue brings fatigue analysis up front in the design-to-manufacturing
process and creates an MCAE environment for integrated durability management.
-
Literature survey
Andrew D. Hartz (2002) formulated a finite element model of the classical bicycle wheel and compared published results with those revealed by ANSYS. Displacement ,strain and bending characteristics of wheel were etermined. The results indicated that ANSYS modeling can be a useful tool for analyzing simple structures such as the classical bicycle wheel. Liangmo Wang et.al(2009) proposed a new method for evaluating the fatigue life, The ABAQUS software was used to build the static load finite element model of aluminum wheels for rotary fatigue test.. The results indicated that the proposed method of integrating finite element analysis and nominal stress method was good and efficient to predict the fatigue life of aluminum wheels. Alexandru Valentin Raduelescu et.al ( 2012)
analyzed the car rim with the finite
element method using the 40 loading test The finite element analysis was conducted in two stages- the analysis of the state of stresses in the central area of the rim for the intial and optimized versions. The static stresses are studied in order to find the zones with higher stress concentration and to suggest the better design solution. The results have been compared to those obtained using an experimental stand. Sunil N. Yadav and N. S. Hanamapure (2013) analysed the effect of camber angle on stress distribution and fatigue life of wheel rim of passenger car under radial load condition which arises due to off road field area and road unevenness. Finite element analysis (FEA) is carried out by
simulating the test conditions to analyze stress distribution and fatigue life of the steel wheel rim of passenger carP. Meghashyam-et.al(2013) proposed that the modelling of the wheel rim is made byusing CATIA. Later this CATIA model is imported to ANSYS for analysis work. ANSYS software is the latest used for simulatingthe different forces, pressure acting on the component and also for calculating and viewing the results ANSYS static analysis work is carried out by considered two different materials namely aluminium and forged steel and their relative performances have been observed respectively. Inaddition to this rim is subjected to vibration analysis (modal analysis), a part of dynamic analysis is carried out its performance isobserved. In this paper by observing the results of both static and modal analysis obtained forged steel is suggested as best material
-
Analysis of wheel rim
Analysis detailed static analysis -displacement, maximum and minimum vonmises stresses and fatigue analysis of wheel rim under radial loads,. We have consider the stell,aluminum alloy and magnesium,forged steel for analysis the analysis following steps
Material properties Model of the whell rim Importing the model
Boundary conditions and Loading Application of load
-
Material properties
-
Steel alloy:
Youngs modulus (E) =2.34*105 N/mm2 Yield stress=240 N/mm2
Density =7800kg/m3
-
Aluminum alloy:
Youngs modulus (E) =72000 N/mm2 Yield stress=160 N/mm2
Density =2800kg/m3
-
Magnesium alloy:
Youngs modulus (E) =45000N/mm2 Yield stress=130 N/mm2
Density =1800kg/m3
-
Forged steel:
Youngs modulus (E) =210000N/mm2 Yield stress=220 N/mm2
Density =7600kg/m3
-
-
Model of wheel rim
SOLID45 is used for the 3-D modeling of solid structures. The element is defined by eight nodes having three degrees of freedom at each node: translations in the nodal x, y, and z directions.
Table No.1 wheel rim dimensions
Outer diameter
450 mm
Hub hole diameter
150 mm
Bolt hole diameter
20 mm
Rim width
254 mm
3D Model of the wheel rim
Fig 1 Model of the wheel rim
-
Importing the model
-
The imported model is meshed by using Hyper mesh. the meshed model is as follows
Fig 2: Meshing finished model
-
The meshed model (.hm file format) of wheel rim is imported from Hyper Mesh Software to ANSYS Software.by (file>Import>IGES)
-
Later this meshed model is defined with different materials namely steel, Aluminum and Magnesium alloy and forged steel subjected to static analysis
Centrifugal force, F=mr2 N =2*(22/7)*N/60 rad/s Mass=24 kg
Speed=600 rpm =62.8 rps
By substituting, we get centrifugal force=21.3kN which acts at each node of the circumference of the rim.
-
Boundary conditions and Loading:
To get compressive and tensile stress, a load of 21.3kN is applied on the bolt holes of the wheel rim.
Aluminium alloy
-
Displacements
-
Translation in x, y, z directions is zero.
-
Rotation in x, y, z direction is zero.
-
-
Angular velocity in x direction is zero,
y direction is 62.8 rps z direction is zero.
-
These conditions are applied on the six holes provided on the rim.
In the same way, Centrifugal force is also applied in the loading condition on the holes.
-
-
Application of load
After this meshed model is constrained at holes by all DOF where the bolts has to be placed.
After constraining the meshed model, the model is subjected to a centrifugal force of 21.3kN Later the results were obtained in the SOLVER module.Then analysis type is changed from static command to modal command and solution is done. Next solution results such as stress, displacement, von mises, ultimate strength etc. were calucated
-
-
-
-
RESULTS &DISCUSSION
-
Displacement of Alloy wheel
Steel alloy
Magnesium alloy
Forged steel
4.1.1 Displacement graph for alloy wheels
Displacement graph for alloy wheels
4.2 Stress plots for alloy wheels
Steel alloy
Aluminium alloy
Magnesium alloy
Forged steel
4.2.1 Stress Graph for Alloy wheels
4.3 Fatigue plots and S-N curves
Steel alloy
Aluminium alloy
Magnesium alloy
Forged steel
Steel alloy
Aluminium alloy
Magnesium alloy
Forged Steel
4.3.1 Fatigue graph for alloy wheels
Fatigue graph for alloy wheels
Materia l
Displa cemen t
(mm)
Vonmisse s stress (Mpa)
Fatigue strength (cycles)
Steel
0.1663
140.056
2.17*105
alloy
Alumini
0.204
48.326
1.32*105
um alloy
Magnesi
0.2136
32.29
1.2*105
um alloy
Forged
0.1923
135.931
1.97*105
steel
Out of the different materials used steel alloy was found to have greater vonmisses stress of 140.056Mpawhile magnesium alloy has the least vonmisses stress of 32.29 Mpa. Steel alloy has maximum number of cycles to failureNf)=2.17*105Cycle While magnesium alloy has the least Number of cycles to failure (Nf) =1.2*105Cycles.
-
-
Conclusion
In steel alloy the number of cycles to failure is greater than Aluminium alloy, Magnesium alloy and Forged steel. Hence Steel alloy is more feasible to be used in wheel rim than other materials. Further optimization of material thickness to reduce the material consumption can be done and we can improve life of component by using advanced fatigue strain life approach.
-
References