- Open Access
- Total Downloads : 677
- Authors : Sanman P. Kulkarni, S. S. Jain
- Paper ID : IJERTV3IS041692
- Volume & Issue : Volume 03, Issue 04 (April 2014)
- Published (First Online): 25-04-2014
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Water Quality Assessment of Kham River, Aurangabad, Maharashtra
Sanman P. Kulkarni
Civil Engineering Dept Sinhgad College of Engineering,
Pune (M.S.), India
Prof. S. S. Jain
Civil Engineering Dept Sinhgad college of Engineering,
Pune (M.S.), India
AbstractKham River is major river in Aurangabad city. In This paper water quality assessment of Kham River, Aurangabad is presented along with the Water Quality Index. The ten months study from May 2013 to February 2014 is done on six locations of Kham River in order to achieve Water Quality Assessment for future use of Kham River. Major water quality parameters like pH, Turbidity, Dissolved Oxygen, Biochemical Oxygen Demand, Total Suspended Solids, Total Dissolved Solids, Total Alkalinity, Total Hardness and Electrical Conductivity are analyzed in order to assess water quality and to obtain Water Quality Index. Water Quality Index for each selected sampling station is find out by using Modified Mishra and Tiwari method (1985) and Weighted Arithmetic Mean Method. From this Ten months water quality study, it is observed that Kham River is heavily polluted due to presence of untreated sewage and some amount of industrial wastewater. It is concluded that Kham River water is not fit for domestic and drinking purpose.
Keywords – Water Quality Assessment, Water Quality Index, Kham River.
-
INTRODUCTION
Aurangabad city is spread over on area of about 137.40 Sq.Kms. with over 10 lakhs population (2010). Aurangabad city is the major district of Marathwada region of Maharashtra and it is situated on the banks of Kham River in latitude 19 53 ' 59'' north and longitude 75 20' east. The city stands in the Dudhana valley between the Lakenvara range on the north and the Satara hills on the south.
Water Quality Index (WQI) provides a single number that express overall water quality at a certain location and time, based on several water quality parameters. The objective of water quality index is to turn complex water quality data into information that is useful for public [1]. However a water quality index based on some very important parameters can provide a simple indicator of water quality. In general, water quality indices incorporate data from multiple water quality parameters into a mathematical equation that rates the health of a water body with number [3].
Water quality index (WQI) is valuable and unique rating to depict the overall water quality status in a single term that is helpful for the selection of appropriate treatment technique to meet the concerned issues. However, WQI depicts the composite influence of different water quality parameters and
communicates water quality information to the public and legislative decision makers. In spite of absence of a globally accepted composite index of water quality, some countries have used and are using aggregated water quality data in the development of water quality indices [4]. Attempts have been made to review the WQI criteria for the appropriateness of drinking water sources.
In this project Following two methods were used to find out WQI:
-
Modified Tiwari and Mishra method of calculating WQI (1985) [5] to Assess water Quality.
-
Weighted Arithmetic Water Quality Index Method to Assess Suitability for Drinking Purpose [3].
.
-
-
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preliminary survey is carried out, Accessibility for Sampling and Collection is determined, Points at which major Contamination of Kham River find out and then only following stations were selected:
Station A – Barapulla Gate Station B – Makai Gate
Station C – Near Income Tax Office Station D – Banewadi
Station E – Waladgaon Station F Patoda
The points at which major Contamination of Kham River takes place are taken as sampling stations The water samples were collected for water quality assessment from Kham River and analyzed at regular intervals of one month for a period of ten months from May 2013 to February 2014. The samples were well mixed and stored in 1.5 liter plastic cans for the analysis work. Sample collection was usually completed during morning hours between 6.00 am to 9.00 am every for further analysis. The Parameters like Temperature, pH and EC are tested on the spot, D.O fixation is done on the spot and other parameters were tested in ISO standard Environmental Engineering Laboratory. Standard methods as prescribed by IS 10500 were followed for examination of various physical and chemical parameters of water.
Figure No. 1. General View Of Sampling Stations.
-
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Water Quality assessment of Kham River is done for the ten months i.e. from May 2013 to February 2014. In table
number 1, mean values of all parameters for each station is represented. From these values WQI is carried out.
Table No.1 Mean Values of all Parasmeters for each Station.
Sr. No
Parameter
Station-A
Station-B
Station-C
Station-D
Station-E
Station-F
Mean
Mean
Mean
Mean
Mean
Mean
1
Temperature (° C)
23.84
23.84
24
23.88
23.89
23.89
2
pH
7.438
7.579
7.658
7.751
7.962
8.016
3
Turbidity (NTU)
27.66
34.61
38.56
54.38
57.99
62.99
4
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)
2.077
2.03506
1.98347
1.962693
1.94012
1.92682
5
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)
123.3268
125.9345
130.3982
135.2437
139.7369
143.36
6
Chemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)
204.9087
209.043
216.278
221.154
277.258
288.205
7
Total Solids (mg/l)
812.8
833.6
852
866
876.4
885.2
8
Total Suspended Solids (mg/l)
82.8
89.6
94
95.6
96.4
98
9
Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l)
730
744
758
770.4
780
787.2
10
Total Alkanity (mg/l)
331.52
336.88
342.08
345.16
350.28
358.81
11
Total Hardness (mg/l)
341.0255
346.8052
351.8818
370.9093
419.22
436.65
12
Electrical Conductivity (mhos/cm)
1025.1
1041.5
1051.6
1091
1106.6
1108.4
-
Water Quality Index Of Kham River By using Modified Mishra and Tiwari Method:
Factors which have higher permissible limits are less harmful because they can harm quality of river water when they are present in very high quantity. So weightage of factor has an
inverse relationship with its permissible limits. Weightage (Wi) for each parameter is given in Table2 [5].
Therefore Wi = k/Si
Where, k = constant of proportionality Wi = unit weight of factor
Si = maximum permissible limits as recommended by Indian Council of Medical Research / Public Health Environmental Engineering Organization Values of k were calculated as:
K= 1/(1/Si)
Rating scale (Table 3) was prepared for range of values of each parameter. The rating varies from 0 to 100 and is divided into five intervals. The rating Vr = 0 implies that the parameter present in water exceeds the standard maximum permissible limits and water is severely polluted. On the other hand Vr= 100 implies that the parameter present in water has the most desirable value. The other ratings fall between these two extremes and are Vr = 40, Vr = 60 and Vr = 80 standing for excessively polluted, moderately polluted and slightly less polluted respectively. This scale is modified version of rating scale given by Tiwari and Mishra (1985) [5].
Essentially, a WQI is a compilation of a number of parameters that can be used to determine the quality of a river. WQI is calculated for each station and is given in Table
4. The parameters involved in the WQI are pH, Dissolved Oxygen, Electrical Conductivity, Total Dissolved solids, Total alkalinity, Total Hardness. The numerical value is then multiplied by a weighting factor that is relative to the significance of the test to water quality. The sum of the resulting values is added together to arrive at an overall water quality index.
WQI = Wi x Vr
i.e. Water Quality Index is equal to the product of rating (Vr) and unit weight (Wi) of all the factors. Wi x Vr = Wi(pH) x Vr(pH) + Wi(DO) x Vr(DO) + Wi(EC) + Vr (EC) + Wi(TDS) x Vr(TDS) + Wi(Total Alkalinity) x Vr(Total Alkalinity) + Wi(Hardness) x Vr(Hardness).
Table No.2 WQI Quality Factors : the ICMR/CPHEEO standards assigned unit Weights
Water Quality Factors
ICMR/CPHEEO STANDARDS (Xi)
Unit Weight (Wi)
pH
7.0 – 8.5**
0.355
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)
>5*
0.603
Electrical Conductivity (mhos/cm)
<300*
0.01
Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l)
<1500**
0.002
Total Alkalinity (mg/l)
<120*
0.025
Total Hardness (mg/l)
<600**
0.005
*ICMR Standards (1975) **CPHEEO Standards (1991)
Table No.3 Rating Scale for Quality of Water
Sr. No
Parameters
RANGES
Unit Weights (Wi)
Class-1
Class-2
Class-3
Class-4
Class-5
1
pH
7.0-8.5
8.6-8.7
8.8-8.9
9.0-9.1
> 9.2
0.355
6.8-6.9
6.7-6.8
6.5-6.7
< 6.5
2
Dissolved Oxygen
> 7.0
5.1-7.0
4.1-5.0
3.1-4.0
< 3.0
0.603
3
Electrical Conductivity
0-75
75.1-150
150.1-225
225.1-300
> 300
0.01
4
Total Dissolved Solids
0-375
375.1-750
750.1-1125
1125.1-1500
> 1500
0.002
5
Total Alkalinity
21-50
50.1-70
70.1-90
90.1-120
> 120
0.025
6
Total Hardness
0-150
150.1-300
300.1-450
450.1-600
> 600
0.005
7
Rating Scale (Vr)
100
80
60
40
0
8
Extent Of Pollution
Clean
Slight Pollution
Moderate Pollution
Excess Pollution
Severe Pollution
Table No.4 Rating Scale for Quality of Water
Range of Rating Scale (Vr)
Quality Of Water
90-100
Excellent
70-90
Good
50-70
Medium
25-50
Bad
0-25
Very Bad
Table No.5 Water Quality index (WQI) for the Kham River water Sampling stations.
Sr.No
Station No.
Water Quality Index WQI= Wi × Vr
Water Quality
1
Station- A
35.76
Bad
2
Station- B
35.76
Bad
3
Station- C
35.72
Bad
4
Station- D
35.72
Bad
5
Station- E
35.72
Bad
6
Station- F
35.72
Bad
-
Water Quality Index of Kham River By using Weighted Arithmetic Mean Method:
Weighted arithmetic water quality index method classified the water quality according to the degree of purity by using the most commonly measured water quality variables. The method has been widely used by the various scientists and the calculation of WQI was made by using the following equation:
WQI=Qi/Wi
The unit weight (Wi) for each water quality parameter is calculated by using the following formula[3]:
Wi= K/Si
The quality rating scale (Qi) for each parameter is calculated by using this expression:
Qi = 100[(Vi-Vo)/(Si-Vo)]
Where, Vi is estimated concentration of ith parameter in the analyzed water
Vo is the ideal value of this parameter in pure water = 0 (except pH =7.0 and DO = 14.6)
Si is the recommended standard value of ith parameter.
Where, K = proportionality constant and can also be calculated by using the following equation:
K= 1/(1/Si)
Table No.6 Drinking Water Standards, Recommending Agencies and Unit Weights
Sr.No
Parameters
Standards
Recommended Agency
Unit Weight (Wi)
1
pH
6.5-8.5
ICMR/BIS
0.1597
2
Turbidity (NTU)
10
BIS
0.136
3
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)
5
ICMR/BIS
0.2715
4
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)
5
ICMR
0.2715
5
Chemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)
10
WHO
0.1357
6
Total Suspended Solids (mg/l)
500
WHO
0.00271
7
Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l)
500
ICMR/BIS
0.00271
8
Total Alkalinity (mg/l)
120
ICMR
0.01131
9
Total Hardness (mg/l)
300
ICMR/BIS
0.004525
10
Electrical Conductivity (mhos/cm)
300
ICMR
0.004525
Table No.7 WQI and Status of Water Quality
WQI Level
Water Quality Status
0-25
Excellent Water Quality
26-50
Good Water Quality
51-75
Poor Water Quality
76-100
Very Poor Water Quality
Above 100
Unsuitable For Drinking
Table No.8 WQI for Station A by Weighted Arithmetic Mean Method
Sr.No
Parameters
Standards (Si)
Observed Values (Vi)
Unit Weight (Wi)
Quality Rating (Qi)
WiQi
1
pH
6.5-8.5
7.438
0.1597
29.2
4.66
2
Turbidity (NTU)
10
27.66
0.136
276.6
37.617
3
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)
5
2.077
0.2715
130
35.295
4
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)
5
123.3268
0.2715
2466.536
669.66
5
Chemical Oxygen Demand
(mg/l)
10
204.9087
0.1357
2049.087
278.061
6
Total Suspended Solids (mg/l)
500
82.8
0.00271
16.56
0.04487
7
Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l)
500
730
0.00271
146
0.39566
8
Total Alkalinity (mg/l)
120
331.52
0.01131
276.27
3.1246
9
Total Hardness (mg/l)
300
341.0255
0.004525
113.675
0.51437
10
Electrical Conductivity
(mhos/cm)
300
1025.1
0.004525
341.66
1.546
Total Sum
1.00018
5845.588
1030.92
WQI= QiWi/Wi= 1030.733
Table No.9 WQI for Station B by Weighted Arithmetic Mean Method
Sr.No
Parameters
Standards (Si)
Observed Values (Vi)
Unit Weight
(Wi)
Quality Rating
(Qi)
WiQi
1
pH
6.5-8.5
7.579
0.1597
38.6
6.1644
2
Turbidity (NTU)
10
34.61
0.136
346.1
47.0696
3
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)
5
2.03506
0.2715
130
35.295
4
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
(mg/l)
5
125.9345
0.2715
2518.69
683.824
5
Chemical Oxygen Demand
(mg/l)
10
209.043
0.1357
2094.3
284.196
6
Total Suspended Solids (mg/l)
500
89.6
0.00271
17.92
0.04856
7
Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l)
500
744
0.00271
148.8
0.40325
8
Total Alkalinity (mg/l)
120
336.88
0.01131
280.733
3.175
9
Total Hardness (mg/l)
300
346.8052
0.004525
115.6
0.52309
10
Electrical Conductivity
(mhos/cm)
300
1041.5
0.004525
347.166
1.5709
Total Sum
1.00018
6037.909
1062.27
WQI= QiWi/Wi= 1062.0788
Table No.10 WQI for Station C by Weighted Arithmetic Mean Method
Sr.No
Parameters
Standards (Si)
Observed Values (Vi)
Unit Weight (Wi)
Quality Rating (Qi)
WiQi
1
pH
6.5-8.5
7.658
0.1597
43.866
7.005
2
Turbidity (NTU)
10
38.56
0.136
385.6
52.44
3
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)
5
1.98347
0.2715
131.422
35.68
4
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)
5
130.3982
0.2715
2607.964
708.0622
5
Chemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)
10
216.278
0.1357
2162.78
293.489
6
Total Suspended Solids (mg/l)
500
94
0.00271
18.8
0.050948
7
Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l)
500
758
0.00271
151.6
0.410836
8
Total Alkalinity (mg/l)
120
342.08
0.01131
285.06
3.224
9
Total Hardness (mg/l)
300
351.8818
0.004525
117.29
0.5307
10
Electrical Conductivity (mhos/cm)
300
1051.6
0.004525
350.533
1.58616
Total Sum
1.00018
6254.915
1102.4788
WQI= QiWi/Wi= 1102.264
Table No.11 WQI for Station D by Weighted Arithmetic Mean Method
Total Sum
1.00018
6590.047
1158.09
WQI= QiWi/Wi= 1157.884
Table No.12 WQI for Station E by Weighted Arithmetic Mean Method
Sr.No
Parameters
Standards (Si)
Observed Values (Vi)
Unit Weight (Wi)
Quality Rating (Qi)
WiQi
1
pH
6.5-8.5
7.962
0.1597
64.133
10.242
2
Turbidity (NTU)
10
57.99
0.136
579.9
78.8664
3
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)
5
1.94012
0.2715
131.87
35.8027
4
Biochemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)
5
139.7369
0.2715
2794.738
758.77
5
Chemical Oxygen Demand (mg/l)
10
277.258
0.1357
2772.528
376.232
6
Total Suspended Solids (mg/l)
500
96.4
0.00271
19.28
0.05225
7
Total Dissolved Solids (mg/l)
500
780
0.00271
156
0.42276
8
Total Alkalinity (mg/l)
120
350.28
0.01131
291.9
3.30139
9
Total Hardness (mg/l)
300
419.22
0.004525
139.74
0.63232
10
Electrical Conductivity
(mhos/cm)
300
1106.6
0.004525
368.866
1.66911
Total Sum
1.00018
7318.955
1265.99
WQI= QiWi/Wi= 1265.762
Table No.13 WQI for Station F by Weighted Arithmetic Mean Method
Sr.No
Parameters
Standards (Si)
Observed Values (Vi)
Unit Weight (Wi)
Quality Rating (Qi)
WiQi
1
pH
6.5-8.5
8.016
0.1597
67.733
10.816
2
Turbidity (NTU)
10
62.99
0.136
629.9
85.66
3
Dissolved Oxygen (mg/l)
5
1.926822
0.2715
132.012
35.8412
4
Biochemical Oxygen
Demand (mg/l)
5
143.3595
0.2715
2867.19
778.44
5
Chemical Oxygen
Demand (mg/l)
10
282.2054
0.1357
2822.054
382.953
6
Total Suspended Solids
(mg/l)
500
98
0.00271
19.6
0.05312
7
Total Dissolved Solids
(mg/l)
500
787.2
0.00271
157.44
0.4266
8
Total Alkalinity (mg/l)
120
358.81
0.01131
299.008
3.3817
9
Total Hardness (mg/l)
300
436.65
0.004525
145.55
0.6586
10
Electrical Conductivity (mhos/cm)
300
1108.4
0.004525
369.466
1.6718
Total Sum
1.00018
7493.353
1299.9
WQI= QiWi/Wi= 1299.66
CONCLUSION AND FUTURE SCOPE
As WQI of Kham River at Respected Stations is calculated, study reveals that Kham River is heavily polluted due to continuous discharge of untreated domestic sewage and mixing of industrial wastewater. From this WQI study it is noted that Kham River Water comes in to Bad Quality of Water and unsuitable for drinking and domestic purpose.
In this paper WQI is used to evaluate water quality and its suitability for drinking and domestic purpose, so there is future scope is that to carry out WQI to find out irrigation perspective suitability of Kham River.
REFERENCES
-
Jiang Yaping and MA Zongrenl. An Evaluation of Water Quality from Locations of Huangyang Reservoir. Procedia Environmental Engineering 12-280 284. ICESE 2011. Elsevier.
-
P. Ravikumar, Mohammad Aneesul Mehmood and R. K. Somashekar. Water quality index to determine the surface water quality of Sankey tank and Mallathahalli lake, Bangalore urban district, Karnataka, India. Applied Water research 247261 DOI 10.1007/s13201-013-0077-2. Springer.
-
Shweta Tyagi, Bhavtosh Sharma, Prashant Singh, Rajendra Dobhal. Water Quality Assessment in Terms of Water Quality Index. American Journal of Water Resources, 2013, Vol. 1, No. 3, 34-38.
-
Ram Pal Singh, Satyendra Nath, Subhash C. Prasad and Arvind K. Nema. Selection of Suitable Aggregation Function for Estimation of Aggregate Pollution Index for River Ganges in India. DOI: 10.1061/ASCE0733- 9372-208-134:8689 Journal Of Environmental Engineering. AUGUST 2008.
-
Mahesh Kumar Akkaraboyina and S.N.Raju. A Comparative Study Of Water Quality Indices Of River Godavari. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development eISSN : 2278-067X, pISSN : 2278-800.
-
Ghorade I. B, V.R. Jadhavar, V.R. Potadarand and S.S. Patil. Physico-Chemical Assessment of Kham River, Aurangabad, Maharashtra. World Journal of Applied Environmental Chemistry eISSN 2277-8055 Volume 1, Issue 2: 67-71 (2011).
-