- Open Access
- Total Downloads : 744
- Authors : Ranjitha K P, Khalid Nayaz Khan, Dr. N S Kumar, Syed Ahamed Raza
- Paper ID : IJERTV3IS070871
- Volume & Issue : Volume 03, Issue 07 (July 2014)
- Published (First Online): 25-07-2014
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Effect of Wind Pressure on R.C Tall Buildings using Gust Factor Method
Ranjitha K. P1
PG Student, Department of Civil Engineering Ghousia College of Engineering
Ramanagar-562159
Dr. N. S. Kumar3
Professor & Director(R&D) Dept of Civil Engineering Ghousia College of Engineering
Ramanagar-562159
Khalid Nayaz Khan2
Associate professor, Department of Civil Engineering Ghousia College of Engineering
Ramanagar-562159
Syed Ahamed Raza4
Assistant professor Department of Civil Engineering Ghousia College of Engineering
Ramanagar-562159
Abstract – This paper presents a framework for evaluating the equivalent static wind load and a new description of the loading based on the gust loading envelope/peak dynamic loading is presented. The gust response factors and the equivalent static wind loads for various along wind response components at different shapes of building are discussed in detail.
In the present study, analytical investigation of an different shapes of building situated in wind zone I and zoneIV of India, in accordance with IS 875(part 3)-1987, is taken as an example and the various analytical approaches (linear static and dynamic analysis) are performed on the building to identify the base shear, storey displacement, storey drift, overturning moment and storey shear. Also compared for different storey building models in both X and Y directions by using finite element software package ETABs 9.7.4 version.
Keywords Base shear, Drift,Dynamic effect, Equivalent static, Gust, Wind load.
-
INTRODUCTION
In current design practice, as wind is a randomly varying dynamic phenomenon, it has significant dynamic effect on buildings and structures especially on high-rise flexible structures. Most international Codes and Standards utilize the gust loading factor (GLF) approach for estimating dynamic effect on high-rise structures. The concept of GLF was first introduced by Davenport in 1967.
The wind generates pressure in windward wall and suction in leeward wall, lateral walls and part of the roof. Wind loading is a complex live load that varies both in time and space. The object of both analytical and physical modeling of wind loading is usually to derive an equivalent static load for design purposes. Such an equivalent load accounts for the variability in time and space of the true wind loads and for dynamic interactions which may occur between the structure and the wind. The detailed gust factor methods for tall slender buildings developed and established in codes and standards offer examples of such processes. Even without a significant resonant response of the
structures, these methods illustrate that the size of the building leads to averaging of the smaller gust inputs and hence the net effective load is reduced. Now a day there is shortage of land for building, more buildings at a faster growth in both residential and industrial areas. The vertical construction is given importance because of which tall buildings are being built on a large scale. Wind is air in horizontal motion relative to the surface of earth.
Wind effects on structures can be classified as static and dynamic.
Static- Static wind effect primarily causes elastic bending and twisting of structure.
Dynamic-For tall, long span and slender structures a
dynamic analysis of the structure is essential, Wind gusts cause fluctuating forces on the structure which induce large dynamic motions, including oscillations.
Story displacement: Storey displacement is defined as the Lateral deflection of predicted movement of a structure under lateral loads (wind loads).
Storey drift: It is defined as the displacement of one level with respect to the level below it.
-
DESIGN PROCEDURE
Design Wind Speed
Wind speed in the atmospheric boundary layer increases with height from at ground level to maximum at a height called the gradient height. The basic wind speed shall be modified to include risk level, terrain roughness, height of the structure and local topography to get the design wind velocity Vz and is given as:
VZ= Vb. K1. K2. K3
Where, VZ= Design wind speed in m/s at any height 'z' m Vb = Basic wind speed for various zones
K1= Probability factor (risk coefficient) K2 = Terrain roughness and height factor K3= Topography factor
Thickness of slab |
0.125m |
Beam size |
0.3mx0.6m |
Column size |
0.5mx0.5m |
Material Properties |
|
Grade of concrete |
M25 |
Grade of steel |
Fe 415 |
Dead load intensities |
|
FF on floors |
1.75kN/m2 |
FF on roof |
2kN/m2 |
Live load intensities |
|
LL on floors |
3 kN/m2 |
LL on roof |
1.5 kN/m2 |
Risk coefficient (K1): suggested life period to be assumed and the corresponding K1 factor for different class of structures as per IS: 875 (Part 3)
Terrain and height factor (K2): Selection of terrain categories shall be made with due regard to the effect of obstruction, which constitute the ground surface.
Topography Factor (K3): The effect of topography will be significant at a site when the upwind slope is greater than about 3°, and below that, the value of K3 may be taken to be equal to 1.0. The value of K3 is confined in the range of
1.0 to 1.36 for slopes greater than 3°.
Design Wind Pressure: The design wind pressure at any height above mean level shall be obtained by the Following relationship between wind pressure and wind velocity:
z
PZ=0.6 V 2
Where, PZ= Design wind pressure in N/m2 at height 'z' m VZ = design wind velocity in m/s at height z m
Wind Load on Individual Members: (IS: 875 (Part 3)
F = (Cpe Cpi) APZ
Where, Cpe = external pressure coefficient, Cpi = internal pressure- coefficient,
A = surface area of structural or cladding unit and PZ = design wind pressure.
No. of Storey |
15 |
Bottom storey height |
4m |
Storey height |
3m |
Soil type |
Medium |
Wind zone, WDZ |
I, IV |
Shape of buildings |
Square, I shape |
Table: 1. Parameters considered for the study
Linear Analysis
Bottom storey height = 4m, Each storey height = 3 m
The maximum dimension of the building is in between 20- 50m. hence it is classified in to Class B Open terrain with well Scattered obstruction hence category II For all general buildings, k1 = 1 Slope below 30, k3 = 1 Where k2 value depends on the height of building (from IS 875(part3) 1987 table 2).
Table: 2. Linear Wind load calculations as per IS: 875(part 3)-1987 for zone I Vb=33m/s
FLOOR |
h (m) |
hi (m) |
h/2 (m) |
k2 |
Vz (m/s) |
Pz |
A |
Story |
1 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
0.98 |
32.34 |
0.62753 |
105 |
85.66> |
2 |
3 |
7 |
1.5 |
0.98 |
32.34 |
0.62753 |
90 |
73.42 |
3 |
3 |
10 |
1.5 |
0.98 |
32.34 |
0.62753 |
90 |
73.42 |
4 |
3 |
13 |
1.5 |
1.004 |
33.132 |
0.65864 |
90 |
77.06 |
5 |
3 |
16 |
1.5 |
1.026 |
33.858 |
0.68782 |
90 |
80.47 |
6 |
3 |
19 |
1.5 |
1.044 |
34.452 |
0.71216 |
90 |
83.32 |
7 |
3 |
22 |
1.5 |
1.06 |
34.98 |
0.73416 |
90 |
85.9 |
8 |
3 |
25 |
1.5 |
1.075 |
35.475 |
0.75508 |
90 |
88.35 |
9 |
3 |
28 |
1.5 |
1.09 |
35.97 |
0.7763 |
90 |
90.82 |
10 |
3 |
31 |
1.5 |
1.102 |
36.382 |
0.7942 |
90 |
92.92 |
11 |
3 |
34 |
1.5 |
1.11 |
36.63 |
0.80505 |
90 |
94.19 |
12 |
3 |
37 |
1.5 |
1.117 |
36.877 |
0.81597 |
90 |
95.47 |
13 |
3 |
40 |
1.5 |
1.125 |
37.125 |
0.82696 |
90 |
96.75 |
14 |
3 |
43 |
1.5 |
1.132 |
37.372 |
0.83802 |
90 |
98.05 |
15 |
3 |
46 |
1.5 |
1.14 |
37.62 |
0.84916 |
45 |
49.67 |
Table 3: Linear Wind load calculations as per IS: 875 (part 3)-1987 for Zone IV Vb=47m/s
FLOOR |
h (m) |
hi (m) |
h/2 (m) |
k2 |
Vz (m/s) |
Pz (kN/m2) |
A m2 |
Story Shear(kN) |
1 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
0.98 |
46.06 |
1.272914 |
105 |
173.7528 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
1.5 |
0.98 |
46.06 |
1.272914 |
90 |
148.931 |
3 |
3 |
10 |
1.5 |
0.98 |
46.06 |
1.272914 |
90 |
148.931 |
4 |
3 |
13 |
1.5 |
1.004 |
47.188 |
1.336024 |
90 |
156.3149 |
5 |
3 |
16 |
1.5 |
1.026 |
48.222 |
1.395217 |
90 |
163.2404 |
6 |
3 |
19 |
1.5 |
1.044 |
49.068 |
1.444601 |
90 |
169.0183 |
7 |
3 |
22 |
1.5 |
1.06 |
49.82 |
1.489219 |
90 |
174.2387 |
8 |
3 |
25 |
1.5 |
1.075 |
50.525 |
1.531665 |
90 |
179.2048 |
9 |
3 |
28 |
1.5 |
1.09 |
51.23 |
1.574708 |
90 |
184.2408 |
10 |
3 |
31 |
1.5 |
1.1025 |
51.817 |
1.611032 |
90 |
188.4907 |
11 |
3 |
34 |
1.5 |
1.11 |
52.17 |
1.633025 |
90 |
191.064 |
12 |
3 |
37 |
1.5 |
1.1175 |
52.522 |
1.655168 |
90 |
193.6546 |
13 |
3 |
40 |
1.5 |
1.125 |
52.875 |
1.677459 |
90 |
196.2627 |
14 |
3 |
43 |
1.5 |
1.1325 |
53.227 |
1.6999 |
90 |
198.8883 |
15 |
3 |
46 |
1.5 |
1.14 |
53.58 |
1.72249 |
45 |
100.7657 |
GUST FACTOR
A gust factor, defined as the ratio between a peak wind gust and mean wind speed over a period of time can be used along with other statistics to examine the structure of the wind. Gust factors are heavily dependent on upstream terrain conditions (roughness)
Wind load calculation as per IS: 875(part-3)-1987 with gust factor
Time Period Calculation: h=46m (height of structure)
Tx=0.09h/sqrt (d) ..(From page-48)
dx=30m (dx=plan dimension in X-direction) Tx=0.756 sec dy=30m (dy=plan dimension in Y-direction)Ty=0.756 sec
Constants and Parameters:
-
Force coefficient for Clad Building
Along X-axis: h/b =46/30 = 1.53>1, a/b=1. Cf=1.25(Fig-4, page-39) Along Y-axis: h/a =46/30 = 1.53>1, b/a=1. Cf=1.25(Fig-4,page-39)
-
Peak Factor and Roughness Factor
Gf = peak factor defined as the ratio of the expected peak value to the root mean value of a fluctuate load
r = roughness factor which is depends on the size of the structure in relation to the Ground roughness. Gf=1.23(Fig-8,page-50) for Category-2 and building height-46m
-
Background Factor (B) B = background factor indicating a measure of slowly varying component of fluctuating wind load
= (Cy b) / (Cz h) (From Fig 9,page-50)
Along X Axis:=0.543 Where, Cy = lateral correlation constant = 10 (page 52) Cz = longitudinal correlation constant = 12 (page 52) b = breadth of the structure normal to the wind stream. h = height of the structure.
Along Y Axis: =0.543 L (h) = 1333 A measure of turbulence length scale (Fig 8) for height of 72m Cz h / L(h) =0.414Along X Axis B =0.73 (From Fig 9) Along Y Axis: B =0.73 (From Fig 9)
-
Size Reduction Factor (S)
Reduced Frequency Fo = (Czfo h) / Vz Fox = 729.7/ Vz, fo = natural frequency of the structure in Hz = 1 / T = 1.322, Tx =0.756 Ty =0.756 Foy = 729.7/ Vz, h =
height of the structure. Vz = hourly mean speed at height z
-
Constant : is to accounted only for the buildings less than 75 m high in terrain category 4 and for the buildings less than 25 m high in terrain category 3, and is to be taken as zero in all other cases. =0
-
Gust energy factor (E) From Fig 11 and depends on [foL(h)] / Vz fo = natural frequency of the structure = / T Ex =1762.23/ Vz, h = height of the structure. Ey
=1762.23/ Vz, Vz = hourly mean speed at height z
-
– Damping coefficient Damping coefficient of the structure – Table 34 For R.C.C. =0.016 page 52
-
Gust Factor – G = (peak load) / (mean load), and is given by G = 1 + [Gf r [SQRT (B (1 + )2 + (S E) / )]] (from page-49)
-
Along wind Load – Fx: Along wind load on the structure on a strip area Ae, at any height z Fx = Cf AePz G (from page-49) Cf = force coefficient for the building. Ae = effective frontal area considered for the structure at height
-
Pz = design pressure at height z due to hourly mean wind obtained as 0.6 VZ2 (N/m2).
Table: 4.Details of wind load calculations as per IS: 875 (part-3) 1987 with gust factors in zone-1
FL OO R
h (m)
hi (m)
h/2 (m)
k2 Table 33 page49
Vz (m/s)
Pz (kN/m2)
Fo
S
Fig.10 page51
[fo L(h) / Vz]
E
Fig.11 pag52
G
Story Shear (kN)
1
4
4
2.0
0.670
22.110
0.2933
33.0032
0.0187
79.7028
0.0281
2.0743
79.8542
2
3
7
1.5
0.670
22.110
0.2933
33.0032
0.0187
79.7028
0.0281
2.0743
68.4465
3
3
10
1.5
0.670
22.110
0.2933
33.0032
0.0187
79.7028
0.0281
2.0743
68.4465
4
3
13
1.5
0.700
23.100
0.3202
31.5887
0.0205
76.2870
0.0291
2.0774
74.8258
5
3
16
1.5
0.723
23.859
0.3416
30.5838
0.0218
73.8602
0.0298
2.0797
79.9131
6
3
19
1.5
0.746
24.618
0.3636
29.6409
0.0229
71.5830
0.0305
2.0819
85.1657
7
3
22
1.5
0.756
24.948
0.3734
29.2488
0.0234
70.6361
0.0308
2.0829
87.5051
8
3
25
1.5
0.770
25.410
0.3874
28.7170
0.0241
69.3518
0.0312
2.0842
90.8354
9
3
28
1.5
0.785
25.905
0.4026
28.1683
0.0248
68.0266
0.0316
2.0856
94.4716
10
3
31
1.5
0.789
26.037
0.4068
28.0255
0.0250
67.6818
0.0317
2.0860
95.4544
11
3
34
1.5
0.799
26.367
0.4171
27.6747
0.0254
66.8347
0.0319
2.0868
97.9256
12
3
37
1.5
0.810
26.730
0.4287
27.2989
0.0258
65.9270
0.0322
2.0876
100.6835
13
3
40
1.5
0.820
27.060
0.4393
26.9660
0.0263
65.1231
0.0325
2.0887
103.2364
14
3
43
1.5
0.831
27.423
0.4512
26.6091
0.0267
64.2610
0.0327
2.0895
106.065
15
3
46
1.5
0.842
27.786
0.4632
26.2614
0.0272
63.4215
0.0329
2.0904
54.4705
Table: 5. Details of wind load calculations as per IS: 875 (part-3) 1987 with gust factors in zone-4
FLO OR
h (m)
hi (m)
h/2 (m)
k2 Table 33 page49
Vz (m/s)
Pz (kN/sqm)
Fo
S
Fig.10 page51
[fo L(h) / Vz] E
Fig.11 pag52
G
Story Shear (kN)
1
4
4
2
0.67
31.49
0.5950
23.1724
0.0362
55.9616
0.0362
2.1083
164.6
2
3
7
1.5
0.67
31.49
0.5950
23.1724
0.0362
55.9616
0.0362
2.1083
141.1
3
3
10
1.5
0.67
31.49
0.5950
23.1724
0.0362
55.9616
0.0362
2.1083
141.1
4
3
13
1.5
0.7
32.9
0.6494
22.1793
0.0378
53.5632
0.0375
2.1129
154.4
5
3
16
1.5
0.723
33.981
0.6928
21.4738
0.0389
51.8593
0.0385
2.1163
164.9
6
3
19
1.5
0.746
35.062
0.7376
20.8117
0.0399
50.2604
0.0393
2.1192
175.9
7
3
22
1.5
0.756
35.532
0.7575
20.5364
0.0404
/td>
49.5956
0.0397
2.1207
180.7
8
3
25
1.5
0.77
36.19
0.7858
20.1630
0.0409
48.6938
0.0402
2.1224
187.6
9
3
28
1.5
0.785
36.895
0.8167
19.7777
0.0415
47.7634
0.0407
2.1243
195.2
10
3
31
1.5
0.789
37.083
0.8251
19.6775
0.0417
47.5212
0.0409
2.1250
197.3
11
3
34
1.5
0.799
37.553
0.8461
19.4312
0.0421
46.9265
0.0412
2.1262
202.4
Modeling In ETABS (9.7.4)
Fig 1: Extents of wind diaphragm for square-shape
Fig 2: Extents of wind diaphragm for I-shape
12
3
37
1.5
0.81
38.07
0.8696
19.1673
0.0425
46.2892
0.0415
2.1275
208.1
13
3
40
1.5
0.82
38.54
0.8912
18.9336
0.0428
45.7247
0.0418
2.1285
213.4
14
3
43
1.5
0.831
39.057
0.9153
18.6830
0.0433
45.1194
0.0422
2.1301
219.3
15
3
46
1.5
0.842
39.574
0.9397
18.4389
0.0436
44.5300
0.0425
2.1312
112.6
Fig 3:ETABS 3-D model for Square-shape
Fig 4: ETABS 3-D model for Square-shape
Table: 6. Point Displacement in mm for Square & I shape
sno of storeys
square shape
I shape
Without Gust factor
With Gust factor
Without Gust factor
With Gust factor
ZONE 1
ZONE IV
ZONE 1
ZONE IV
ZONE 1
ZONE IV
ZONE 1
ZONE IV
Ux
Uy
Ux
Uy
Ux
Uy
Ux
Uy
Ux
Uy
Ux
Uy
Ux
Uy
Ux
Uy
15
18.6
21.8
37.6
44.2
19.3
22.7
40
46.9
22.1
27.0
44.8
54.8
23
28.1
47.5
58.1
14
18.4
21.6
37.2
43.8
19.1
22.5
39.5
46.5
21.8
26.6
44.3
54
22.7
27.8
47
57.3
13
18.0
21.2
36.5
43
18.8
22.1
38.8
45.6
21.4
26.1
43.4
52.9
22.3
27.1
46.1
56.1
12
17.5
20.6
35.5
41.9
18.2
21.5
37.6
44.3
20.8
25.3
42.2
51.3
21.7
26.3
44.8
54.4
11
16.9
19.9
34.2
40.3
17.5
20.7
36.2
42.7
20
24.3
40.6
49.3
20.8
25.2
43
52.2
10
16.0
19
32.5
38.5
16.6
19.7
34.4
40.6
19.1
23.1
38.7
46.8
19.8
24
40.9
49.5
9
15.1
17.8
30.6
36.2
15.6
18.5
32.3
38.2
17.9
21.7
36.3
43.9
18.6
22.4
38.3
46.4
8
13.9
16.6
28.3
33.6
14.4
17.1
29.8
35.4
16.6
20.0
33.6
40.6
17.1
20.7
35.4
42.8
7
12.7
15.1
25.7
30.6
13.1
15.6
27.1
32.2
15.1
18.2
30.6
36.9
15.6
18.8
32.2
38.9
6
11.3
13.5
22.9
27.4
11.6
13.9
24
28.7
13.4
16.2
27.2
32.9
13.8
16.7
28.5
34.5
5
9.7
11.7
19.8
23.8
10
12.1
20.7
24.9
11.6
14.0
23.4
28.4
11.9
14.4
24.6
29.8
4
8.1
9.8
16.4
19.9
8.3
10.1
17.1
20.8
9.6
11.7
19.4
23.6
9.8
12
20.3
24.7
3
6.3
7.7
12.8
15.7
6.4
7.9
13.3
16.4
7.5
9.1
15.1
18.5
7.6
9.4
15.8
19.3
2
4.4
5.5
8.9
11.3
4.5
5.7
9.2
11.7
5.2
6.5
10.5
13.1
5.3
6.6
11
13.7
1
2.4
3.2
4.8
6.5
2.4
3.2
5
6.7
2.8
3.6
5.7
7.4
2.9
3.7
5.9
7.7
Fig 5: Square shape displacement when wind load in X-direction for zone-I and zone-IV
Fig 6: Square shape displacement when wind load in Y direction for zone-I and zone-IV
Fig 8: I shape displacement when wind load in X-direction for zone-I and zone-IV
Fig 9: I shape displacement when wind load in Y direction for zone-I and zone-IV
Fig 7: displacement when wind load in X-direction For zone-I & zone-IV without gust
Fig 10: displacement when wind load in X-direction For zone-I & zone-IV With gust
Table: 7. Drift for Square & I shape
no of Storey
square shape
I shape
Without Gust factor
With Gust factor
Without Gust factor
With Gust factor
ZONE 1
ZONE IV
ZONE 1
ZONE IV
ZONE 1
ZONE IV
ZONE 1
ZONE IV
Ux
Uy
Ux
Uy
Ux
Uy
Ux
Uy
Ux
Uy
Ux
Uy
Ux
Uy
Ux
Uy
15
0.067
0.072
0.136
0.145
0.072
0.077
0.149
0.159
0.081
0.121
0.165
0.246
0.088
0.13
0.181
0.268
14
0.114
0.127
0.23
0.258
0.122
0.137
0.253
0.284
0.137
0.187
0.277
0.379
0.147
0.201
0.304
0.415
13
0.167
0.189
0.338
0.383
0.179
0.203
0.37
0.42
0.199
0.26
0.405
0.528
0.214
0.279
0.443
0.576
12
0.220
0.251
0.446
0.508
0.235
0.268
0.485
0.554
0.262
0.333
0.532
0.676
0.281
0.356
0.58
0.735
11
0.272
0.311
0.552
0.631
0.289
0.331
0.598
0.684
0.325
0.405
0.659
0.821
0.345
0.43
0.714
0.889
10
0.323
0.371
0.656
0.752
0.342
0.392
0.708
0.811
0.386
0.475
0.782
0.963
0.408
0.503
0.844
1.039
9
0.373
0.428
0.757
0.869
0.394
0.452
0.815
0.935
0.445
0.543
0.902
1.101
0.47
0.573
0.971
1.184
8
0.422
0.484
0.856
0.983
0.444
0.51
0.917
1.054
0.502
0.608
1.019
1.233
0.528
0.64
1.092
1.322
7
0.468
0.538
0.95
1.092
0.491
0.565
1.015
1.167
0.557
0.67
1.131
1.359
0.585
0.703
1.208
1.453
6
0.513
0.59
1.04
1.197
0.536
0.617
1.109
1.276
0.61
0.729
1.238
1.48
0.638
0.763
1.319
1.577
5
0.555
0.639
1.127
1.297
0.579
0.666
1.195
1.376
0.66
0.785
1.34
1.593
0.688
0.818
1.421
1.69
4
0.596
0.686
1.208
1.392
0.617
0.711
1.275
1.469
0.708
0.837
1.436
1.699
0.733
0.868
1.515
1.793
3
0.633
0.732
1.285
1.484
0.652
0.753
1.347
1.556
0.752
0.887
1.526
1.799
0.775
0.913
1.6
1.887
2
0.671
0.789
1.36
1.6
0.686
0.807
1.418
1.667
0.796
0.947
1.615
1.92
0.815
0.969
1.683
2.001
1
0.594
0.796
1.204
1.615
0.605
0.762
1.249
1.674
0.702
0.91
1.424
1.845
0.715
0.927
1.477
1.914
Fig 11: Square shape drift when wind load in X-direction for zone-I and zone-IV
Fig 12: Square shape drift when wind load in Y direction for zone-I and zone-IV
Fig 15: drift when wind load in X-direction for zone-I & Zone-IV without gust
Fig 13: I shape drift when wind load in X-direction for zone-I and zone-IV
Fig 14: I shape drift when wind load in Y direction for Zone-I and zone-IV
Fig 16: drift when wind load in X-direction for zone-I & Zone-IV with gust
CONCLUSIONS
-
The story displacement is maximum at the top story and becomes zero at bottom story. As the story increases then the displacement also increases for zone-1 and zone-4 with and without gust factor.
-
If the wind zone is increases then the story displacement also increases for different shape buildings.
-
The story displacements in regular structures with and without gust factor in zone-1 and zone- 4 is lesser when compare to the displacements in irregular structures.
-
The story drift is gradually increases from first story to second story and it is maximum at
second story in both X and Y-directions and it becomes decreases to top story for different shapes in zone-1 and zone-4 with and without gust factor.
-
When the wind zone is increases then the story drift also increases for different shapes. And the story drift in irregular shape structures with and without gust factor in zone-1 and zone-4 is maximum when compared to regular shape structures.
-
-
REFERENCES
-
B. Dean Kumar and B.L.P. Swami Wind effects on tall building frames-influence of dynamic parameters Indian Journal of Science and Technology. Vol. 3 No. 5 (May 2010)
-
Mendis P., samali B., and Cheung J. Wind loading on tall buildings, EJSE special issue: loading on structure (2007)
-
Dr.N.M Bhandari, Dr Prem Krishna, Dr krishen kumar An explanatory hand book on proposed IS-875 wind load on buildings and structuresDepartment of civil engineering Indian institute of technology Roorkee
-
Achyut khajuria. Estimation of wind load on tall buildings. Master of engineering thesis of dept. of civil engineering, Thapar University, Patiala-147004. (2006-2008)
-
Dr. P.Dayarathnam Hand book on design and detailing of structuresprofessor of civil engineering Indian institute of technology, Kanpur
-
IS: 875-1987(part 3) Code of practices for design loads (other than earth quake) for buildings and structures. Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi.
-
Abhilash G.S Response of multistoried R.C structure to gravity, wind and seismic forces. Department of civil engineering S.J.C.E Mysore(2009-2010).