Multiband Reconfigurable Antenna for Cognitive-Radio

Multiband Reconfigurable Antenna for Cognitive-Radio

Manaswini M. Bhave

Dept. of Electronics and Telecommunication-Microwave Communication

P.I.C.T. Pune

Prof. R. G. Yelalwar

Dept. of Electronics and Telecommunication-Microwave Communication

PICT ,Pune

Abstract A yagi u- da shaped frequency reconfigurable antenna has been presented in this paper. This antenna is designed for four bands B1-1.6 GHz, B2-1.4GHz, B3-1.3GHz and B4-2.6GHz used for various applications like GPS, FDMA, PCS, Bluetooth, etc. For the proposed antenna return loss is better than -10dB and VSWR is below 2 for each band. PIN diodes are used to switch frequencies between different bands. The antenna structure proposed is compact in size.

Index TermsPatch antenna, frequency reconfigurable antenna.

1. INTRODUCTION

   Reconfigurable antennas consist of antenna elements each having some intelligence means each having ability to configure the physical structure of individual element through which polarization, radiation and frequency properties of antenna will change. A multi-band reconfigurable antenna enables a single antenna element to perform multiple functions by changing its architecture thereby dynamically changing its properties (operation frequency, radiation pattern, polarization). Multiband antenna enables a single antenna to work on multiple bands by reconfiguring itself.

   Frequency reconfigurable antennas have reconfiguration of frequency by changing the structure while other parameters remain unchanged. So frequency reconfigurable antennas can be applied among a wide arrangement.

   In ref [3] a reconfigurable multiband and wideband patch antenna, employing dual-patch elements and C-slots with compact volume, has been represented and studied using simulation and measurement. Two PIN diode switches are used to switch ON and OFF two patch elements. In ref [4] designs of compact five-band printed antennas for fixed and reconfigurable systems is represented. The design procedure is described in detail. By adding four varactor diodes in the design reconfigurability is achieved.

   Ref [7] says that reconfigurable antenna changes array factor as well as array element factor and also the advantages of antenna. Different antenna structures are presented in [8]-[11] that would reduce dynamic range by the use of different kinds of switches. Antennas functionality depends on antennas radiating elements parameter, such as sizes shapes and positions of radiating element over the aperture. Modifying these antenna parameter changes the frequency. The PIN diodes are used as a switch because they have really high conductivity (1018carrier/cm3) which is near

   that of metal controlled under dc bias is presented in [8].

   Switching controls and their types is briefly discussed in [9]. Ref [13] represents the basic yagi-uda shaped antenna which will be the base of further design.

2. ANTENNA DESIGN

   Various dimensions have been experimented till now by changing dimensions and keeping the shape constant. They are like when the size of length and width is interchanged, when the substrate height is reduced by 1.57mm it was observed that different bands were obtained which had shift in frequencies in some cases and in some cases it remained same with improved Return Loss, when the number of patches are increased from P1 to P8 to P1 to P12 here it was observed that the Return Loss was improved by 0.16 in case when D1 was in ON state. Moreover when patches were reduced to P1 to P4 the Return Loss was degraded by 0.19 in similar case of diode D1 switching condition. The experiment giving the best results are proposed in the paper below.

   The geometry of the proposed antenna is yagi-uda antenna with its parameters is shown in fig.1. The antenna is printed on FR4 substrate with dielectric constant of r=4.4 and the thickness is 1.6mm.

   The type of feeding used is microstrip feeding technique. The software used to model and simulate this antenna is HFSS

   1. The optimized parameters of the antenna are shown in the table 1. The ground is of 80x60mm2. The four parasitic patches on the main patch are placed and their height and width and gaps are also shown in table 1.

      Four PIN diodes (D1 to D4) are introduced between the gaps of parasitic patches for the purpose of switching. Depending on the state of diode, the electrical length of patch can be changed and their resonating patch is reconfigured. And depending on the state of PIN diodes four different bands can be observed.

      TABLE 1 DIMENSIONS OF AN ANTENNA

      Length (mm)	Width (mm)	Gap (mm)
      h=36	w=26	—–
      p=32	w1=4	g1=2
      p=28	w2=2	g2=1
      p=24	w3=1	g3=1
      h4=20	w4=1	g4=1

      Fig. 3. PIN diode when revese biased

      Where VG, ZL and ZG are applied voltage, load impedance and input impedance respectively in Fig.2 and Fig 3.

      IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

      The performance of the proposed antenna is characterized its electrical properties such as VSWR, Bandwidth and Return Loss. After simulation of the above antenna following were the results for Return Loss for all four conditions of PIN diodes.

      Name X Y m01.00 1.6800 -15.0182

      m2 2.8700 -1.8280

      -2.00

      -4.00

      dB(S(1,1))

      -6.00

      -8.00

      -10.00

      -12.00

      -14.00

      XY Plot 5

      HFSSDesign1 ANSOFT

      up2 : Sw

      Set

      Curve Info dB(S(1,1))

      eep

      m1

      .

      -16.00

      1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60

      Freq [GHz]

      Fig. 4. RL when D1 is ON

      Fig. 1. Antenna Geometries

3. WORKING OF PIN DIODE

   The ON and OFF conditions of switches are realized by forward a reverse biasing of the PIN diodes. When the PIN diode is forward biased, the switch is ON. The switch has low

   Name X Y m01.00 1.4400 -12.0334

   m2 2.8700 1.4638

   -2.50

   dB(S(1,1))

   -5.00

   -7.50

   -10.00

   m1

   XY Plot 5

   HFSSDesign1 ANSOFT

   Curve Info dB(S(1,1))

   Setup2 : Sw eep

   impedance characteristics and acts as a closed circuit and thus the current can flow through the diode as shown in Fig.2.

   -12.50

   1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75

   Freq [GHz]

   Fig. 5. RL when D1 and D2 are ON

   Name X Y m01.00 1.3300 -12.1939

   -2.50

   dB(S(1,1))

   -5.00

   XY Plot 5

   HFSSDesign1 ANSOFT

   Curve Info dB(S(1,1))

   Setup2 : Sw eep

   Fig.2. PIN diode when forward biased

   When a PIN diode is reversed biased, the switch is OFF, this switch exhibits high impedance characteristics and act as an open circuit. This means to no connection and PIN diode in reverse diode acts as a capacitor (CJ) as shown in Fig. 3

   -7.50

   -10.00

   -12.50

   m1

   1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75

   Freq [GHz]

   Fig. 6. RL when D1, D2 and D3 are ON

   Y

   -23.7260

   Name X m10.00 2.8700

   -5.00

   dB(S(1,1))

   -10.00

   -15.00

   -20.00

   XY Plot 5

   HFSSDesign1 ANSOFT

   2 : Sw ee

   Setup

   Curve Info dB(S(1,1))

   p

   Fig.8 to Fig 11. Shows VSWR against frequency for all the four bands. VSWR of antenna is closely related to RL. The value of VSWR is low for all the freqency bnds, it should be below 2dB, this condtion is satisfied in all the cases. When all diodes are ON we get VSWR as 1.16 and it can be observed that as RL improves the VSWR is also improved.

   m1

   -25.00

   1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00

   Freq [GHz]

   Fig. 7. RL when All are ON

   Fig. 4. To Fig. 7. shows simulated results for Return Loss(RL) of this proposed antenna. The goal of the design is to achieve good peformance i.e. RL which is below -10 dB. When all diodes are ON the first resonance of 2.6 GHz is obtained. Here all patches and antenna act as a single antenna and gives the RL of 23.72 dB. Similarly when only D1is ON, the patch with the length and height pxw1 act as a single antenna and the length of the antenna is changed. As the frequency of patch antenna depends on length and width the frquency resonates to 1.6 GHz. Similarly when other diodes are ON or OFF the change in frequency as the lenghth goes on changing as well as other parameters shown below is observed.

   Fig. 12. Current distribution when all diodes are ON

   Name X Y

   1m210.00 2.8600 1.1648

   100.00

   VSWR(1)

   80.00

   60.00

   40.00

   XY Plot 6

   HFSSDesign1 ANSOFT

   Curve Info VSWR(1)

   Setup2 : Sw eep

   20.00

   0.00

   m1

   1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75 3.00

   Freq [GHz]

   Fig. 8. VSWR when all diodes are ON

   Fig. 13. Current distribution when D1 are ON

   Y 1.4315

   X

   .6800

   Name

   2m215.00 1

   200.00

   175.00

   150.00

   VSWR(1)

   125.00

   100.00

   75.00

   50.00

   XY Plot 6

   HFSSDesign1 ANSOFT

   : Sw ee

   Setup2

   Curve Info VSWR(1)

   p

   25.00

   0.00

   m1

   1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60

   Freq [GHz]

   Fig. 9. VSWR when D1 are ON

   Fig. 14. Current distribution when D1and D2 are ON

   Name

   2m215.00

   Y 25.5415

   X 1.6800

   200.00

   175.00

   150.00

   VSWR(1)

   125.00

   100.00

   75.00

   50.00

   25.00

   XY Plot 6

   m1

   HFSSDesign1 ANSOFT

   Sw eep

   Setup2 :

   Curve Info VSWR(1)

   0.00

   1.00 1.20 1.40 1.60 1.80 2.00 2.20 2.40 2.60 2.80

   Freq [GHz]

   Fig. 10. VSWR when D1and D2 are ON

   Name

   1m610.00 1

   140.00

   120.00

   VSWR(1)

   100.00

   80.00

   60.00

   40.00

   20.00

   Y 1.6513

   X

   .3300

   m1

   XY Plot 6

   HFSSDesign1 ANSOFT

   Curve Info VSWR(1)

   Setup2 : Sw eep

   Fig. 15. Current distribution when D1, D2 and D3 are ON

   The electric fied distribution for each case considered is show in Fig 12 to Fig. 15. From the given distributions we can observe that when D1 is ON electric field is distributed over parasitic patches and as the length of antenna is changed the

   0.00

   1.00 1.25 1.50 1.75 2.00 2.25 2.50 2.75

   Freq [GHz]

   Fig. 11. VSWR when D1, D2 and D3 are ON

   electrical length also changes and thus the resonant frequency is changed.

   TABLE 2 RESULTS OF ELECTRICAL PARAMETRES FOR ALL PIN CONDITIONS CONSIDEREDS

   1. TESTING

      The testing of the fabricated antenna was performed on ROHDE& SCHWARZ ZVH8 cable and network analyzer 100 KHz to 8GHz.The simulation 3 and simulation 4 are fabricated and tested. The simulated and the tested results are approximately same. There is a slight shift in frequency band when compared to simulated results which are not more than 0.2 GHz. Return Loss is deteriorated as compare to simulate results due to the external noise and other practical disturbances.

      The comparative study is done of the simulated and tested results and which is shown in table 7.1 for both the simulations.

   2. CONCLUSIONS

The antenna is working on four bands successfully with the return Loss less than -10dB and their testing on antenna analyzer is giving all most accurate results.

The proposed structure is very simple to study and implement because it has planar structure. It is compact in size. The antenna possess great Return Loss and VSWR

REFERENCES

1. Constatine A. Balanis, Antenna theory Analysis and Design, Third edition, Wiley India edition.

   Diode Condition	Comparison	Freque ncy	Return Loss
   When D1 is ON	Simulated	1.6	-16.23
   	Practical	1.7	-15.70
   When D1 and D2 is ON	Simulated	1.4	-12.03
   	Practical	1.5	-17.67
   When D1,D2 and D3 is ON	Simulated	1.3	-10.31
   	Practical	1.5	-16.26
   All are ON	Simulated	2.6	-23.72
   	Practical	2.8	-30.00

2. David M. Pozar, Microwave Engineering, Second edition, Wiley India edition.

3. Hattan F. Abutarboush, R.Nilavan, S.W. Cheung, and Karim

   1. Naser, A Reconfigurable Widband And Multiband Antenna Using Dual-patch Elements For Compact Wireless Devices, IEEE transactions on antennas and propogation,vol.60,no.8, January 2012.

4. Hattan F. Abutarboush, R.Nilavan, S.W. Cheung, and Karim

   1. Naser, Compact Printed Multiband Antenna With Independent Setting Suitable For Fixed And Reconfigurable Wireless Communication Systems, IEEE transactions on antennas and propogation,vol.60,no.8,august 2012

5. P. S. Hall, P. Gardner, J. Kelly, E. Ebrahimi, M. R. Hamid, and

   F. Ghanem, Antenna challenges in cognitive radio, Int. Symp. on Antennas and Propagation, Oct. 2008.

6. Keng-Hsien Chen, Jhao-Ru Chen ,Sung-Jung Wu and Jenn- Hwan Tarng,A Multi-eared Antenna with Frequency and Polarization Reconfigurability, Proceedings of the Asia- Pacific Microwave Conference 2011.

7. Sheng-Yi Huang, Yeuh-Ta Chung, and Jwo-Shiun Sun, Compact Multi-Band Antenna for Mobile Telephone Applications

8. E. Fathy, A. Rosen, H. S. Owen, F. McGinty, D. J. McGee, G. C.Taylor, R. Amantea, P. K. Swain, S. M. Perlow, and M. ElSherbiny, Silicon-based reconfigurable antennas-concepts, analysis, implementation, and feasibility, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 51, no.6, pp. 16501661, Jun. 2003.

9. A. Mirkimali and P. S. Hall, Log periodic printed dipole array for wideband frequency reconfiguration, IET Seminar on Wideband/Multiband Antennas and Arrays for Civil or Defence Applications, London, Mar. 13, 2008.

10. S. Zhang, G. H. Huff, J. Feng, and J. T. Bernhard, A pattern reconfigurable microstrip parasitic array, IEEE Trans. Antennas.

11. Kyutae Lim and Joy Laskar, Emerging Opportunities of RF IC/System for Future Cognitive Radio Wireless Communications, 1-4244-1463-6/08 ©2008 IEEE

12. B. A. Cetiner, H. Jafarkhani, J.-Y.Qian, H. J. Yoo, A. Grau, and F. De Flaviis, Multifunctional reconfigurable MEMS integrated antennas for adaptive MIMO systems, IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 42, no. 12,pp. 6270, Dec. 2004.

13. Sonia S Sharma and C.C Tripathi, Design of Frequency Reconfigurable Antenna For Multi Standard Mobile Communication, International Journal of Emerging Trends in Electrical and Electronics (IJETEE ISSN: 2320-9569), Vol. 6, Issue. 2, Aug-2013.