Analysis of Wire Rope

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV3IS100030

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Analysis of Wire Rope

Er. G. S. Ramteke*

Department of Mechanical Engineering, M.Tech.(CAD/CAM) Final Year,

Rajiv Gandhi College of Engineering Research Technology Chandrapur (MS)-442401 (INDIA)

Prof. Y. L. Yenarkar**

Department of Mechanical Engineering

Rajiv Gandhi College of Engineering Research Technology Chandrapur (MS)-442401 (INDIA)

Abstract :- Wire ropes are critical mechanical components in mining and other industries where hoisting is common. Most of the industries follow the replenishment criteria based on the conventional practices. Some research has been carried out on analysis of wire ropes and the FE approach is also reported by some researchers in the recent past. This paper presents a study carried out on simple 7 wire single strand rope using the analytical as well as FE approach. The results obtained are compared. It is concluded that the behavior is significantly altered when rotation of the wire rope is allowed and when the rotation is prevented. Each case has been analyzed and presented.

Key words- Wire rope, strand, helix, FE approach.

  1. INTRODUCTION

    A number of studies have been carried out to understand and quantify the wear which occurs in wire rope. The criteria for rope replenishment are mostly based on no. of broken wires per unit length. During service a wire rope continuously deteriorates under several influences which include tension, bending, fatigue, corrosion and wear. Because of the multiple deteriorating factors and the complex interactions between them, replacement criteria is difficult to formulate and is subjective.

    S.D.S.R. KARAMCHETTY & W.Y. Yuen [2] studied the contact problem in wire rope. The contact stresses induced at contact points resulted due to deformation under loading. G.A. COSTELLO [3] studied the behavior of a multilayered cable under axial, bending and torsional loading conditions and concluded that centre wire suffers a largest axial stress. J.W. PHILLIPS and G.A. COSTELLO [4] studied the analysis of wire ropes with internal wire rope cores and concluded that strands and wires that are partially aligned subjected to maximum axial strain. On the contrary, the wires that are not axially aligned within strands are subjected to bending & shear stresses and axially aligned wires do not experience the bending & shear stress. S.A.VELINSKY [5] has developed a design methodology for multilayered wire strand. Assumption was made that strands retain its helical shape before and after deformation. WEI JIANG [6] studied the general formulation to analyze wire ropes having simple wire strand and different complex cross sections also. K. KUMAR[7] have studied the contact stresses under tension & torsion and found that contact stresses are influenced by helix angle. C. ERDEM MRAK AND CENGIZ ERDÖNMEZ [8] introduced a technique of modeling of wire rope with IWRC.

    C. ERDEM EMRAK AND CENGIZ ERDONMEZ [9]

    presented a three-dimensional modeling approach and studied the finite element analysis of wire ropes. SHIBU. G, MOHANKUMAR K.V AND DEVENDIRAN. S [10]

    developed the finite element model for multilayered wire rope and declared that the helical wires with a fixed end condition carry large axial load as compared to free end conditions for same axial strain.

    In the light of above, it is evident that the analysis of wire rope is significant for decision on optimum replenishment criteria and hence the simple strand wire rope was chosen for analysis of wire rope. The objective is to know the exact behavior of individual wires under loading condition The equations derived by Costello [2] are regarded as a baseline, and finite element analysis results are compared with these analytical results in order to confirm generated finite element model.

  2. DESCRIPTION & CALCULATION

    The problem of determining the stresses in a rope is an extremely complex one. The geometric data for the chosen single strand rope with 7 wires is as shown in Table-1. The calculations are carried out for two approaches i.e. when rotation prevented and when rotation allowed which are based on the analytical approach by G. A. Costello. The results obtained by considering the different permissible elongations such as 0.2%, 0.25%, 0.3%, 0.35%, 0.4%, 0.45% and 0.5% are tabulated as given in Table 2 & Table 3.

    TABLE1. GEOMETRIC DATA FOR SIMPLE STRAIGHT STRAND

    Parameter

    Unit

    Value

    Radius of center wire of strand, 1

    Mm

    1.97

    Radius of outer helical wire of strand,2

    Mm

    1.865

    Helix angle of an outside wire, 2

    Degree

    78.20

    Modulus of elasticity, E

    N/mm2

    2×105

    Poisson ratio,

    0.3

    No. of outer helical wires in a strand,2

    Nos.

    06

    TABLE2. ANALYTICAL RESULTS WHEN ROTATION IS PREVENTED

    Sr. No

    %

    elon g- atio n

    Axial load on centre & outer

    wire

    Theoretical calculations

    Centre wire

    Outer helical wire

    (N)

    (N)

    Axial wire stress N/ mm2

    Max shear stress on c/s (N/ mm2

    Axial stress caused by tension (N/ mm2

    Max. norma l stress due to bendi ng

    (N/ mm2

    Max shear stress due to twisting moment (N/

    mm2

    Max normal tensile stress (N/ mm2

    1

    0.2

    4874

    24271

    400

    0

    378

    17

    13

    396

    2

    0.25

    6093

    30339

    500

    0

    473

    22

    16

    495

    3

    0.3

    7312

    35490

    600

    0

    553

    26

    19

    579

    4

    0.35

    8530

    42475

    700

    0

    662

    31

    23

    693

    5

    0.4

    9749

    48544

    800

    0

    756

    35

    26

    792

    6

    0.45

    10967

    54611

    900

    0

    851

    39

    30

    891

    7

    0.5

    12186

    60679

    1000

    0

    946

    44

    33

    990

    TABLE 3.ANALYTICAL RESULTS WHEN ROTATION IS ALLOWED

    td>

    (N)

    Sr No

    %

    elon g- atio n

    Axial Load on centre wire &

    outer wire

    Theoretical calculations

    Centre wire

    Outer helical wire

    (N)

    Axial wire stress N/ mm2

    Max shear stress on c/s (N/ mm2

    Axial stress caused by tension (N/ mm2

    Max. normal stress due to bending (N/ mm2

    Max shear stress due to twisting moment (N/

    mm2

    Max normal tensile stress (N/ mm2

    1

    0.2

    0

    8548

    0

    132

    133

    124

    110

    257

    2

    0.25

    0

    10685

    0

    165

    166

    155

    137

    322

    3

    0.3

    0

    12822

    0

    198

    200

    186

    165

    386

    4

    0.35

    0

    14959

    0

    231

    233

    218

    192

    451

    5

    0.4

    0

    17096

    0

    264

    266

    249

    220

    515

    6

    0.45

    0

    19233

    0

    297

    300

    280

    247

    580

    7

    0.5

    0

    21370

    0

    330

    333

    311

    275

    644

  3. FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING OF WIRE STRAND

    A simple straight strand model is constructed with a center wire of radius 1=1.97mm, surrounded by six helical wires (Radius of outer helical wire of strand, 2=1.865mm) wound around with the helix angle 78.20. The helix angle 2 is determined by tan 2 = p2 / 2r2, where p2 is the pitch length of strand. The CAD model generated with the geometric data as given in Table-1 is shown in Fig.1.

    The CAD model generated has been preprocessed. Surface to surface contact interactions between center and six outer single helical wires and between six helical wires are defined individually. The material properties used for FEA are material- structural steel, Youngs Modulus

    %

    elon g- atio n

    Load actin g on centr

    e wire

    Load actin g on outer

    wire

    Finite Element Analysis Results

    Centre wire

    Outer helical wire

    1

    (N)

    2

    (N)

    Shea r stres s

    (N/ mm2

    )

    Von- Misse stress (N/ mm2)

    Von- Misse s Stress (N/ mm2)

    Nor mal stres ses (N/ mm2

    )

    Shea r stres s (N/ mm2

    )

    Max. Prin. stress (N/ mm2)

    Min. Princi ple Stress (N/ mm2)

    0.2

    4874

    24271

    1.0

    380

    443

    38

    75

    423

    39

    0.25

    6093

    30339

    1.0

    476

    554

    48

    72

    532

    17

    0.3

    7312

    35490

    1.5

    544

    605

    56

    63

    609

    21

    0.35

    8530

    42475

    2.0

    666

    747

    67

    11

    744

    34

    0.4

    9749

    48544

    2.1

    761

    851

    77

    13

    846

    27

    0.45

    10967

    54611

    2.1

    857

    962

    87

    13

    957

    89

    0.5

    12186

    60679

    2.2

    951

    1065

    96

    15

    1064

    69

    11

    Fig.1 CAD model of wire strand

    Selection of appropriate element type is necessary for the analysis. For this analysis, SOLID186 element is used which is a 3D element for centre wire and outer helical wires, TARG170 and CONTA174 element are used for contacts between centre wire and helical wire and among outer helical wires. SURF154 element is used for defining surface contacts. The meshing of element is done as shown in Fig. 2(a). In this quadrilateral meshing is chosen. Load has been calculated based on % elongation applied and the results of analytical approach. Displacement in x, y & z direction at top end is assigned by applying displacement toolbar. Negative pressure has been applied on the bottom end. Using these constraints the finite element analysis was performed to predict the stresses acting on the strand. Analysis result for Von misses stresses in wire strand is shown in Fig.2(b)

    Fig. 2(a) Mesh Fig. 2(b) Analysis result

    Prediction of strand response for axial loading has been attempted for the two cases. i.e. rotation of strand under loading is allowed and rotation of strand restricted under loading conditions. The FE analysis results for each of the above mentioned two considerations are given in Table 4 & Table-5.

    TABLE 4. FEA RESULTS IS WHEN ROTATION RESTRICTED

    = 2 x 10 Pa, poisons ration=0.3, stiffness behavior

    flexible, ultimate tensile strength-4.6 x 108 Pa, No. of elements-1360, no. of nodes-7680.

    TABLE 5. FEA RESULTS WHEN ROTATION IS ALLOWED

    0.33

    %

    elon g- atio n

    Load actin g on centr e wire

    Loa d acti ng on oute r wir

    e

    Finite Element Analysis Results

    Centre wire

    Outer helical wire

    1

    (N)

    2

    (N)

    Shear stress (N/ mm2)

    Von- Misse stress (N/ mm2)

    Von- Misse s Stress (N/ mm2)

    Nor mal stres ses (N/ mm2

    )

    She ar stres s (N/ mm2

    )

    Max. Prin. stress (N/ mm2)

    Min. Princ iple Stress (N/ mm2)

    0.2

    0

    854

    0.21

    110

    140

    11

    36

    135

    5

    0.25

    0

    106

    0.32

    138

    176

    14

    45

    169

    6

    0.3

    0

    128

    0.26

    150

    190

    17

    29

    203

    7

    0.35

    0

    149

    0.27

    193

    246

    19

    34

    237

    9

    0.4

    0

    170

    0.32

    222

    282

    22

    39

    272

    10

    0.45

    0

    192

    0.28

    248

    316

    25

    44

    305

    11

    0.5

    0

    213

    276

    352

    28

    91

    339

    12

  4. RESULTS OF FEA

    For each of these cases, the Finite Element analysis was performed. The stress patterns for various stresses for each of the cases i.e. when rotation is allowed and when rotation is restricted for centre wire and peripheral wire are shown in following figures.

    CASE-I (STRAND IS NOT ALLOWED TO ROTATE)

    Fig.3 (a) Von Misses Stress In Fig.3(b) Von Misses Stress In Centre Wire Outer Wire

    Fig.4(a)Normal Stress(Y-Axis) Fig.4(b) Normal Stress (Y-Axis) in centre wire in outer wire

    Fig.5(a) Shear Stress in centre Fig.5(b) Shear Stress in outer Centre wire wire

    As seen in the Fig.3(a)Von Misses stresses in centre wire are constant throughout the entire region when the rotation is not allowed primarily because the stresses include the direct stresses as the major component which is constant throughout whereas the Fig.3(b) shows the localized concentration of stresses at the region of contact between centre & outer wires.

    CASE-II (STRAND IS ALLOWED TO ROTATE)

    Fig.6(a) Von Misses Stress in Fig.6(b) Von Misses in outer centre wire wire

    Fig.7a) Normal Stress (Y axis) Fig.7b) Normal stress (Y axis) In centre wire in outer Wire

    Fig.8 (a) Shear Stress in Fig.8(b) Shear stress in Centre wire outer wire

    As shown in Fig. 4 (a) & Fig. 4 (b) normal stresses (Y-Axis) are uniformly distributed in centre wire whereas there appears to be region of concentration in case of outer wire. The similar results are shown in Fig.5(a) & Fig.5(b) displaying the shear stress also follows the same pattern.

    As seen in the Fig.6(a) Von Misses stresses in centre wire are constant throughout the entire region when the rotation is allowed primarily because the unwinding of outer wires resulted in some stresses in centre wire which is constant throughout whereas the Fig.6 (b) shows the localized concentration of stresses at the region of contact between centre & outer wires. As shown in Fig.7 (a) & Fig. 7(b) normal stresses (Y-Axis) are uniformly distributed in centre wire as well as in outer wire. Fig.8 (a) & Fig.(b) shows the distribution of shear stress on centre and outer wire.

  5. RESULT & DISCUSSION

    The wire ropes have varied designs as per applications. To make the study, typical single strand wire rope has been chosen for analysis which includes analytical as well as FE approach. Two results are in agreement in the broader view and consistent for each of the cases.

    On application of axial load, the outer wire of the wire rope shall have tendency to unwind providing some extension. Due to this phenomena, However when the rotation is prevented much of the load is carried by the central wire as it is under the normal load. However the outer wires are subjected to axial, bending and twisting loads. And hence, the normal load on outer wires is significantly lower than load on central wire.

    As found in Table 2 & Table 4, it can be seen that the axial stress on the central wire using analytical approach and FE approach has less than 5% deviation and the results are consistent. This can also be verified from Fig.9 & Fig.10 which are graphs showing % elongation verses analytical and FE results.

    The Fig. 11, Fig.12 & Fig.13 shows the Von misses stresses, normal stresses and shear stresses obtained by FE analysis in centre and outer helical wires.

    Fig.9. Analytical & FE results for centre wire when rotation is restricted

    Fig. 10 Analytical & FE results for outer wire when rotation

    is restricted

    Fig.11 Von misses stresses in centre & outer wires.

    Fig.12 Normal stresses in centre & outer wires.

    Fig.13 Shear stresses in centre & outer wires.

    The difference in the values may be attributed to the fact that theoretically the centre wire is considered to be in pure tension which may not be the case as there always be some shear and contact stresses due to outer wires. Also FE approach has used the contact elements describing the contact between the inner & outer wire which is again not considered in analytical approach. Both the graphs are almost parallel, however FE results are diverging for the higher values of % elongation.

    When rotation is allowed, the wire rope unwinds and this allows the outer wires to extend more than the centre wire. This result in outer wires taking more load and also reduces the strain in the centre wire. This also makes the reduction in the overall strain in the wire rope increasing the capacity of the wire rope as stresses in the wire appears to be less.

    Fig. 14 Analytical & FE results for centre wire when rotation is allowed.

    Fig. 15 Analytical & FE results for outer wire when rotation is allowed

    Fig. 14 & Fig.15 depicts the behavior of centre wire & outer wires with the increasing elongation, it has been observed that both the stresses are in the agreement and the deviation of FE result from analytical result is about 7%. This attributes to the variation in assumption in FE analysis & analytical calculation and effect of contact element in FE analysis.

    Fig.16 & Fig.17 depicts the behavior of von misses stresses in centre wire & peripheral wire when rotation is allowed along with the normal stresses (Y-axis) using FE approach.

    Fig.16 Von Misses stresses in centre & outer wire

    Fig.17 Normal stresses in centre & outer wire

    The results obtained using both the approaches indicate that FE analysis could be used to verify with the analytical equations given by G. A. Costello [2].

  6. CONCLUSION

The results obtained suggest the allowing rotation decrease the direct stresses. However, these needs to be further investigated as the direct stresses are significant cases in comparison with the operational conditions in which the rotation is not allowed. Normally short distance hauling application and hoisting with guide ways do not allow the rotation. Hence this detailed study for the variation in the rotational elongation is justified. In the real application which involves hauling through a long distance rotation and local unwinding of the wire rope is not uncommon and often is a chief cause of reduction in life of the wire rope. Therefore it is just to conclude that though the analytical results & FE results are in agreement a detailed investigation involving variation in helix angle, coefficient of friction, % elongation, rotational elongation allowed, etc needs to be done.

Further the behavior of wire rope while it is bending over a sheave is also of interest and some study on this could also be done as the centre as well as outer wire in this case shall be subjected to bending and the loading will be significantly complex.

REFERENCE

  1. G.A. COSTELLO, Professor, Dept. of Theoretical & Applied Mechanics, University of Illions, Urbana, THEORY OF WIRE ROPE, 2nd Edition, SPRINGER Mechanical Engg Series.

  2. S.D.S.R. KARAMCHETTY, Sr. Engineer, Mathtech Inc, Washington DC and W.Y.YUEN The University of Newcastle, N.S.W, Australia CONTACT PROBLEM IN WIRE ROPES, Journal of mechanical design Vol-01/October 1979,pg:702-710

  3. G.A. COSTELLO, Professor, Dept. of Theoretical & Applied Mechanics, University of Illions, Urbana, STRESSES IN MULTILAYERED CABLES, Journal of Energy Resources Technology, ASME, Sept- 1983, Vol-105, pg:337-340.

  4. J.W. PHILLIPS and G.A. COSTELLO, Professor, Dept. Of Theoretical & Applied Mechanics, University of Illinois at Urbana, ANALYSIS OF WIRE ROPE WITH INTERNAL WIRE ROPE CORES, Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol-52, Sept-1985, pg:510-516.

  5. S.A. VELINSKY, Associate Professor, Dept. Of Mechanical Engg, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1513 University Avenue, Madison, WI-53706, ON THE DESIGN OF WIRE ROPE, Journal of Mechanism, transmssion & Automation in design, Sept-1989, Vol-111, pg:382-388

  6. WEI JIANG, Mechanical Engg. Department, Florida International University, Miami, FL-33199, A GENERAL FORMULATION OF THE THEORY OF WIRE ROPES, Journal of Applied Mechanics,

    Sept-1995, Vol-62, pg:747-755

  7. K.KUMAR, Professor, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur; J.E.COCHRAN, Professor & J.A.CUTCHINS, Professor, Department of Aerospace Engineering, Auburn University, Auburn, AL , CONTACT STRESSES IN CABLES DUE TO TENSION AND TORSION, Journal of Applied Mechanics,

    Vol-64, Dec-1997, pg:935-939

  8. C. ERDEM MRAK AND CENGIZ ERDÖNMEZ, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34394 Gumussuyu, Istanbul, Turkey ON THE PROBLEM OF WIRE ROPE MODEL GENERATION WITH AXIAL LOADING Association for Scientific Research, Mathematical and Computational Applications, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 259-268, 2010.

  9. C. ERDEM MRAK AND CENGIZ ERDÖNMEZ, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Istanbul Technical University, 34394 Gumussuyu, Istanbul, Turkey FINITE ELEMENT MODEL FOR INDEPENDENT WIRE ROPE CORE WITH DOUBLE HELICAL GEOMETRY SUBJECTED TO AXIAL LOADS, Indian Academy of Science, Sadhana Vol. 36, Part 6, Dec 2011, pp. 955-1008.

  10. SHIBU. G, MOHANKUMAR K.V AND DEVENDIRAN. S, ANALYSIS OF A THREE LAYERED STRAIGHT WIRE ROPE STRAND USING FINITE ELEMENT METHOD. Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering 2011 VOL III WCE 2011, JULY 6 – 8, 2011, LONDON, U.K.

Leave a Reply