To Improve Productivity for Casting Technology By Reducing Weight of Gating System

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV3IS100073

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

To Improve Productivity for Casting Technology By Reducing Weight of Gating System

Shashank V. Gulhane

Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering Department G.W.C.E.T, Nagpur

Rahul M. Dahekar

Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering Department G.W.C.E.T, Nagpur

Abstract One of the key elements to make a metal casting of high quality is the design of a good gating system. The gating system refers to those channels through which the metal flows from the ladle to the mold cavity. The use of a good gating system is even more important if a casting is produced by a gravity process. If poor gating techniques are used, invariably, lower casting quality is achieved, because of damage on the molten metal received during the flow through the gating system. It could be even worse, if the molten material is a sensitive metal for receiving damage during the filling, because of dross and slag formation. The purpose of this study is to identify the problem associated with gating system for the manufacturing of ginning dead weight which is used for their machineries at Jadhao Steel Alloys, Amravati. The typical casting defects were identified at M/s Jadhao Steel Alloys, Amravati in which the shrinkage defect ,blow holes, pin holes, gas holes, sand inclusion and misrun defects etc. are prominent. The total percentage of defect is around 25-30 % of the total casting produced. It means total % of rejection is around 25- 30% which is very high and not acceptable. After careful investigation of the casting process, it was found that all the above defects can be considerably reduced by using a proper gating system. Hence optimization of gating system is considered as a main topic of investigation. According to deep study and analysis of existing gating system used by industry, it was found that old gating ratio was incorrect and after gating system calculations it was found that the total of weight of gating system is very high that has to reduce considerably. After careful observation and analysis of existing gating system used by industry, it was decided to make necessary changes in the design and dimension of gating system.By using proposed gating system the experiment has been carried out at Jadhao Steel Alloys, Amravati. The result found after experimentation are very sound and productive. By using standard gating ratio as per ISO, it was found that the total percentage of productivity improved from 42% to 74% by reducing total weight of gating system from 4.68 kg to 2.39 kg with reducing total percentage of rejection from 25% – 30% to 7.5% – 10%, With % of yield increases from 86% to 92%, with keeping flow laminar through all sections of gating system which is most essential to reduce casting defects.

Keywordscasting; gating system; mould cavity; productivity, casting defects.

INTRODUCTION

GATING SYSTEM

The term gating system includes all the passage ways through which molten metal enters in to the mould cavity. The gating system is made up of the following parts:

  • a) Pouring basin b) Sprue c) Runner bar d) In gates e) Riser

    Fig. 1. Gating system 3D

    The design of gating system is important and the main requisites of gating system are: The gating should be so designed that it avoids the mould or core erosion by reducing metal velocity within the cavity and avoiding direct impingement on mould walls or cores. The flow of metal to the mould cavity should occur with as minimum as possible turbulence, because if turbulence is excessive, the aspiration of mould gases will occur which will oxidize the mould metal.

    The flow of molten metal must be laminar so as to reduce the casting defects like shrinkage, porosity, blow holes, gas holes, misrun, sand inclusion etc.

    IMPORTANCE OF GATING SYSTEM

    The design of gating system is as important as rise ring of a steel casting. It is well known that improper gating practice can result in defects like , ceroXide, inclusions, cold shuts, misruns, hot tears, local shrinkages, and gas cavities in a steel casting. A gating system should be pre-designed and incorporated in method drawing as is the case of rise ring and not left to the discretion of the molder.

    CONSTITUENTS OF GATING SYSTEM

    A gating system for steel castings can be broadly divided into: – The entry section consisting of the pouring basin, sprue and sprue base. The distribution section consists of the runners and in gates.

    FUNCTIONS OF A GATING SYSTEM

    The entry section of a gating has two functions:-

    1. To supply liquid metal free of entrapped gases, slag and eroded sand.

    2. To establish a hydraulic pressure head, this will force the metal through the rest of the gating system and into the casting.

    The distribution section has five functions:-

    1. To decrease the velocity of the metal stream, to minimize turbulence, both in the gating system as well as in the mold cavity.

    2. To avoid mold and core erosion, to establish the best possible thermal gradient in the casting,

    3. To regulate the rate of flow of metal into the mold cavity.

    In addition to these, the gating system should be of such simple design as to facilitate molding, particularly with mechanical methods, at the same time involving minimum fettling cost and affording maximum casting yield. Many of these requirements and functions are conflicting with each other. Effort should be to harmonize these so as to create conditions conducive to the production of a defect free casting.

    PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION

    During our industrial visit at M/s Jadhao Steel Alloys, Amravati it was found that so many types of steel casting jobs are produced. The typical casting defects observed like Shrinkage, Blow Holes, Pin Holes, Gas Holes, Sand Inclusion, Misrun etc. are prominent. It was found that industry was facing the problem of rejection particularly for ginning weight steel casting used as dead weight for their machineries.

    Following table shows the inspection report for ginning weight at quality desk.

    After observation of inspection report and discussion had with GM production Jadhao Steel Alloys, Amravati regarding with the percentage of rejection and various casting defects observed for the manufacturing of Ginning weight which is use as a dead weight for ginning machine it was decided to follow actual procedure of casting manufacturing in relation with the gating system used. In order to reduce percentage of rejection and casting defects. It was decided to study and analysis of existing Gating System used by industry.

    STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF EXISTING GATING SYSTEM

    The study and analysis of existing Gating System and Proposed Gating System for the manufacturing of Ginning Dead Weight at Jadhao Steel Alloys Amravati. The main objective of this study is to follow standard casting procedure in relation with standard gating system as per researchers research in the field of casting technology. As per the discussions with Mr. G. M. (PROD.) at Jadhao Steel Alloys Amravati regarding with casting defects and percentage of rejection for the manufacturing of ginning dead weight, it was observed that all the above defects can be considerably reduced by using a proper gating system. Hence optimization of gating system is considered as a main topic of investigation.

    GINNING DEAD WEIGHT

    Ginning dead weight used as a dead weight for ginning machine which is agro based machine. To provide extra load on machine during vibration of ginning machine in order to remove cotton seeds from cotton fiber

    Fig. 2. Ginning Weight

    TABLE I: Inspection report for GW. By using existing gating system

    Job Qty

    shrink age

    Blow holes & gas holes

    Sand inclusion

    Misrun

    Total

    % of rejection

    20

    3

    2

    1

    6

    30%

    20

    1

    1

    1

    2

    5

    25%

    20

    1

    1

    1

    1

    4

    20%

    20

    2

    2

    1

    5

    25%

    20

    2

    1

    2

    5

    25%

    20

    1

    3

    1

    5

    25%

    Average percentage of rejection is around 25% to 30%

    DIMESIONAL DRAWING OF GINING WEIGHT

    Fig. 3. Dimensional Drawing Of Ginning Weight

    DESIGN & DIMENSION OF EXISTING GATING SYSTEM

    As per the discussion had with G. M. (PROD.) at Jadhao Steel Alloys Amravati regarding with casting defects and percentage of rejection for the manufacturing of ginning dead weight, it was observed that all the above defects can be considerably reduced by using a proper gating system. Hence optimization of gating system is considered as a main topic of investigation. In order to reduce casting defects it was decided to follow deep study and analysis of existing gating system.

    Fig. 4. Design and Dimension of Existing Gating System

    Total volume of gating = 6.51 × 10-4 m3

    Total weight of gating = Total volume of gating × density

    = 6.51×104×7.2×103

    = 4.68 kg

    GATING RATIO AND ITS CALCULATIONS FOR EXISTING GATING SYSTEM

    The typical gating system made by industry found typical casting defects which has increased percentage of rejection and which has affected productivity. In order to reduce percentage of rejection it was decided to follow standard gating ratio as per ISO in foundry technology.

    Gating ratio: – The rate of flow of molten metal through the sprue is a function of the cross sectional areas of the sprue, runners and in gates. Gating ratios recommended by various theoreticians in the literature vary over a wide range. The Dimensional characteristics of any gating system can be generally expressed in terms of gating ratio.

    TABLE II: Gating area with Dimension for existing gating system.

    Sr. No.

    Part

    Existing Gating System Dimensions (mm)

    Existing Gating Area

    (mm2 )

    1

    Sprue

    D1= 20

    D2= 25

    491

    2

    Runner

    L= 60, H= 65,

    T= 23

    920

    3

    In gates

    L=30, H=15, w=40, L=30, H=5, W=40

    1050

    Gating ratio becomes 1:1.87:2.13

    But as per standard gating ratio suggested by many researchers (i.e. 1:2:1, 1:2:0.5, 1:4:1, 2:7:1) for grey cast iron. Hence obtained gating ratio is not matched with standard gating ratio as per researchers in foundry technology.

    PROPOSED GATING SYSTEM

    According to deep study and analysis of existing gating system it was found that industry has used improper gating system. The result found after calculation and analysis of existing gating system are very typical in which, gating ratio 1:1.87:2.13 which is not matched with standard gating ratio as per researchers research in foundry technology. The further result after calculation of existing gating system are, the weight of gating system is around 4.7 Kg. which is very high it has to reduce considerably. Along with this calculation it was found that the flow pattern for existing gating system is laminar. On the basis of above results found for existing gating system it was decided to made necessary changes in the dimensions of runner and in gates with riser in order to maintain standard gating ratio as per researchers research in foundry technology. Necessary changes in the dimensions of runner and in gates with riser proposed in order to maintain standard gating ratio as per researchers in foundry technology and to reduce total weight of gating system in order to improve total productivity.

    TABLE III: Gating area with Dimension for existing & proposed gating system

    Section

    Existing gating volume in

    (m3)

    Existing gating weight in

    (kg)

    Proposed gating in (m3)

    Proposed gating weight in

    (kg)

    Sprue

    -5

    -3

    -5

    -3

    4.19 X10

    301.68X10

    4.19 X10

    301.68X10

    Runner

    -5

    6.712 X10

    483.264

    -3

    X10

    7.2956X10

    5

    0.5252

    In gates

    -6

    -3

    -6

    -3

    72 X10

    518.4X10

    14.4X10

    103.68X10

    Riser

    -4

    5 X10

    3.6

    -4

    2.034 X10

    1.4646

    TOTAL

    4.68 kg

    2.398 kg

    GATING RATIO AND CALCULATION FOR PROPOSED GATING SYSTEM

    According to changes in the dimensions of existing gating system, the followings calculations are made in order to maintain standard gating ratio.

    With these calculations for proposed gating system gating ratio will be equal to

    Cross sectional area of sprue = 491mm2 Cross sectional area of runner = 1000 mm2 Cross sectional area of in gates = 505 mm2

    Therefore 491: 1000: 505 = 1: 2.03: 1.02

    TABLE IV: Gating area for existing & proposed gating system

    Sr. No

    Part

    Existing Gating System Dimension

    s (mm)

    Proposed Gating System Dimensions

    (mm)

    Existing Gating Area

    2

    (mm )

    Proposed Gating Area

    2

    (mm )

    1

    Sprue

    D1= 20

    , D2= 25

    D1= 20,

    D2= 25

    491

    491

    2

    Runner

    L= 60, H=

    65,

    T= 23

    L= 60, H=

    65,

    T= 25

    920

    1000

    3

    In gates

    L=30 H=15,w=4 0,

    L=30, H=5,

    W=40

    L=20, H=12,w=30

    ,L=5, W=20,H=5

    1050

    505

    Gating ratio becomes (1:1.87:2.13)(1:2.03:1.03)

    Hence It was found that proposed gating ratio, becomes (1:2.03:1.02) is matched with std. gating ratio i.e. 1:2:1 as per researchers research in foundry technology.

    FLOW PATTERN ANALYSIS IN BETWEEN PROPOSED & EXISTING GATING SYSTEM

    According to necessary changes in the design & dimension of existing gating system it was found that the proposed gating ratio matched with standard gating ratio & the total weight of gating system reduced from 4.7 kg to 2.4 kg. In order to reduced casting defects and percentage of rejection it was decided to check flow pattern for the proposed gating system. Following are the calculations made to check molten metal flow pattern for the individual sectio of proposed gating system.

    TABLE V: Comparative analysis of flow pattern in between proposed and existing gating system

    Section

    For Existing Gating System

    For Proposed Gating System

    Flow pattern

    Reynolds Number

    Mean Velocity in m/s

    Reynolds Number

    Mean Velocit y in m/s

    Sprue

    580

    4.214

    580

    4.214

    Laminar

    Runner

    108

    1.3756

    103

    1.3040

    Laminar

    In gates

    141

    3.5877

    265

    6.7270

    Laminar

    Riser

    96

    0.6966

    246

    1.7845

    Laminar

    The above comparative analysis for flow pattern and mean velocity in between existing and proposed gating system produced flow pattern is laminar through all typical section of existing and proposed gating system with typical

    variation in mean velocity because of changes in the dimension of existing gating system. In order to reduce various casting defects by using existing gating system this flow pattern analysis plays an important role during manufacturing of Ginning Dead Weight.

    EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION

    By using proposed gating system the experiments has been carried out at Jadhao Steel Alloys, Amravati. The result found after experimentation are very sound and productive. By using standard gating ratio as per ISO, it was found that the total weight of gating system reduced from

    4.68 kg to 2.39 kg with reducing total percentage of rejection from 25% – 30% to 7.5% – 10%, With % of yield increases from 86% to 92%, with productivity increases from 42% to 74%, with keeping flow laminar through all sections of gating system which is most essential to reduce casting defects.

    INSPECTION REPORT

    TABLE VI: Inspection Report by using proposed gating system

    Job Qty

    Blow holes

    shrinka ge

    Gas holes & pin

    holes

    Sand inclusion

    Misrun

    Total

    % of defects

    20

    1

    1

    2

    10%

    20

    20

    1

    1

    5%

    20

    1

    1

    2

    10%

    20

    1

    1

    2

    10%

    20

    2

    2

    10%

    Average percentage of rejection is around 5% to 10%

    ACTUAL WEIGHT OF EXISTING & PROPOSED GATING SYSTEM

    TABLE VII: Comparison for Actual weight of existing & proposed gating system

    Section

    Existing gating volume in

    (m3)

    Existing gating weight in (kg)

    Proposed gating in (m3)

    Proposed gating weight in (kg)

    Sprue

    -5

    -3

    -5

    -3

    4.19 X10

    301.68X10

    4.19 X10

    301.68X10

    Runner

    6.712 X10

    5

    -3

    483.264 X10

    -5

    7.2956X10

    0.5252

    In gates

    -6

    72 X10

    -3

    518.4X10

    -6

    14.4X10

    -3

    103.68X10

    Riser

    -4

    5 X10

    3.6

    -4

    2.034 X10

    1.4646

    TOTAL

    4.68 kg

    2.398 kg

    According to necessary changes in the design & dimension of existing gating system it was found that the

    proposed gating ratio matched with standard gating ratio & the total weight of gating system reduced from 4.7 kg to 2.4 kg. This is most economical for every manufacturing industry in mass production.

    The above comparative analysis for flow pattern and mean velocity in between existing and proposed gating system produced flow pattern is laminar through all typical section of existing and proposed gating system with typical variation in mean velocity because of changes in the dimension of existing gating system.

    BUNCH WEIGHT ANALYSIS

    TABLE VIII: Bunch Weight analysis after experimentation by using proposed gating system

    Sr. No

    Batch No.

    Bunch weight in

    Kg

    Casting weight

    in Kg

    Gating weight in

    Kg

    %

    yield

    1

    GW/2012/04

    32.800

    30.600

    2.200

    93.29

    2

    GW/2012/04

    32.440

    29.800

    2.64

    91.86

    3

    GW/2012/04

    32.100

    29.900

    2.2

    93.14

    4

    GW/2012/04

    32.480

    30.180

    2.3

    92.91

    5

    GW/2012/04

    32.550

    30.100

    2.45

    92.47

    6

    GW/2012/04

    32.620

    30.190

    2.43

    92.55

    7

    GW/2012/04

    32.380

    29.900

    2.48

    92.34

    8

    GW/2012/04

    32.620

    30.180

    2.44

    92.51

    9

    GW/2012/04

    32.460

    29.980

    2.48

    92.35

    10

    GW/2012/04

    32.510

    29.940

    2.57

    92.09

    Average

    32.40

    30

    2.4

    92

    The bunch weight analysis by using proposed gating system produced the average weight of casting found 30 kg with average bunch weight of casting found 32.40 which produced average percentage of yield 92% with average weight of existing gating system 2.4 kg.

    Sr. No

    Batch No.

    Bunch

    weight in Kg

    Casting

    weight in Kg

    Gating

    weight in Kg

    %

    yield

    1

    GW/2011/10

    34.650

    29.800

    4.85

    86.00

    2

    GW/2011/10

    34.720

    29.920

    4.8

    86.17

    3

    GW/2011/10

    34.710

    30.100

    4.61

    86.71

    4

    GW/2011/10

    34.590

    29.920

    4.67

    86.49

    5

    GW/2011/10

    34.690

    29.880

    4.81

    86.13

    6

    GW/2011/10

    34.750

    29.930

    4.82

    86.12

    7

    GW/2011/10

    34.670

    29.900

    4.77

    86.24

    8

    GW/2011/10

    34.850

    30.180

    4.67

    86.59

    9

    GW/2011/10

    34.580

    29.980

    4.6

    86.69

    10

    GW/2011/10

    34.660

    30.100

    4.56

    86.84

    Average

    34.687

    29.971

    4.716

    86%

    TABLE IX: Bunch Weight Analysis for existing gating system

    The average weight of casting found 29.971 kg with average bunch weight of casting found 34.687 which produced average percentage of yield 86% with average weight of existing gating system 4.716 kg.

    The typical bunch weight analysis in between existing and proposed gating system produced percentage of yield increases from 86% to 92% which is most economical for manufacturing industry.

    COST ANALYSIS IN BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED GATING SYSTEM TO MEASURE TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY

    This cost analysis in between existing and proposed gating system produced percentage of productivity increases from 42% to 74% which is most essential for every manufacturing industry. (See Appendix)

    DISSCUSSION

    The purpose of this study is to identify the problem associated with gating system for the manufacturing of ginning dead weight which is used for their machineries at Jadhao Steel Alloys Amravati. After observation, inspection and analysis of every factor of gating system it has found that, the small change in the dimension of gating system results large effects on the production cost. The average total percentage of rejection for existing gating system is around 25% to 30% of total casting produced. The average total percentage of rejection for proposed gating system is around 7.5% to 10% of total casting produced. This major change in the average percentage of rejection plays an effective role on production cost. After careful investigation of the casting process, it was found that all the above defects can be considerably reduced by using a proper gating system. Hence optimization of gating system is considered as a main topic of investigation.

    The number of factors influencing the gating design is numerous. But out of all these factors can be considered as a important one. According to deep study and analysis It was decided to follow standard gating ratio as per ISO suggested by many researchers in the field of casting .In order to maintain standard gating ratio It was found that old gating ratio was incorrect. After gating system calculation it was found that the total weight of gating system is very high, that has to considerably reduce. After careful observation and analysis it was decided to make necessary changes in the design and dimension of gating system.

    By using proposed gating system the experiments has been carried out at Jadhao Steel Industry, Amravati. The result found after experimentation are very sound and productive. By using standard gating ratio as per ISO, it was found that the total percentage of productivity improved from 42% to 74% by reducing total weight of gating system from

    4.68 kg to 2.39 kg with reducing total percentage of rejection from 25% – 30% to 7.5% – 10%, With % of yield increases

    from 86% to 92%, with keeping flow laminar through all sections of gating system which is most essential to reduce casting defects.

    CONCLUSION

    The typical changes in design and dimension of gating system play a crucial role during manufacturing of casting product. After observation, inspection and analysis of every factor of gating system it has found that, the small change in the dimension of gating system results large effects on the production cost. The target or motto of project is to reduce casting Defects, to reduce % of rejection and to reduce weight of gating system in order to achieve maximum productivity which is most essential for every manufacturing industry

    The result found after experimentation are very sound and productive .By using standard gating ratio as per researchers research in foundry technology, it was found that the total percentage of productivity improved from 42% to 74% by reducing weight of gating system from 4.68kg to

    2.39 kg with reducing total percentage of rejection from 25%

  • 30% to 7.5% – 10% , with increasing % of yield from 86% to 92% with keeping flow laminar through all sections of gating system which is most essential to reduce casting defects.

To design a gating system for steel casting standard gating ratio plays a crucial role during manufacturing. In ordered to reduce casting defects & percentage of rejections, typical optimization technique must be follow. Design of typical elements of gating system must be produced optimum weight of gating system. Flow pattern analysis is very important in order to check molten metal flow pattern is laminar or turbulent during casting with optimum velocity of molten metal in order to reduce various casting defects. To optimize the gating system for steel casting percentage of yield and percentage of productivity must be improve.

REFERENCES

  1. Shamsuddin Sulalman and Tham Chee Keen, department of mechanical and systems engineering university pertanian malaysia, serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. Flow analysis along the runner and gating system of a casting process. Journal of material processing technology. Vol. 63 (1997) 690-695.

  2. B. Senthilkumar, S.G. Ponnambalam, N. Jawahar. Process factor optimization for controlling pull-down defects in iron castings Published by Elsevier B.V., 2008.

  3. Zhizhong Sun, Henry Hu, Xiang Chen, casting with multiple performance characteristics Numerical optimization of gating system parameters for a magnesium alloy Published by Elsevier B.V., 2007.

  4. Chinmay Das, Manufacturing Science-I, Casting defects, NPTEL website 2004.

  5. Carlos E. Esparza NEMAK S.A. de C.V. Libramiento Arco Vial, Optimal Design of Gating Systems by Gradient Search Methods, Km. 3.8 García, NL 66000, México December 2004 Revised April 2005.

  6. P. R Beeley P.R, 'Foundry Technology', The Butteworth Group (London Butterworths), (1972).

  7. P. N. Rao, Manufacturing Technology, TMH Publication, page 195 -198.

  8. A. Ghosh and A. K. Mallik, Manufacturing Science, East-West Press Private Limited, page 90-92.

  9. Kalpakjian and Schmid, Pearson Education, Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, page 253-254.

  10. E. P. Deganno, Y. T. Black and R. A. Kohser, 'Materials and Processes in Manufacturing', Mac Millan Publishing Co. 7th Edition (1990).

  11. T. R. Vijayaram, S. Sulaiman, A. M. S. Hamouda, M. H. M. Ahmad, 2006. Foundry quality control aspects and prospects to reduce scrap rework and rejection in metal casting manufacturing industries. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 178, 13.

  12. R. E. Swift, J. H. Jackson, L. W. Eastwood, 1949. A study of principles of gating. AFS Trans. 57, 7688.

IJERTV3IS100073

www.ijert.org 78

APPENDIX

Appendix I:Cost Analysis by using existing gating system

Sr. No

Heat No.

Casting Produced

Bunch Weight of each

casting

Bare weight of each

casting

Weight of gating

otal weight of bunch

casting

No of casting accepted

No of casting rejected

Total weight of accepted

casting

Total weight rejected

casting

Total weight of gating

Total production cost

Refund cost due to rejection

and gating

Total price of accepted casting

Productivity in Rs.

Percentage of total productivity

A

B

C

D = B – C

E = A x B

F

G

H = C x F

I = C x G

J = A x D

K = E x @

Rs. 45

L = (I+J) x

@ Rs. 30

M = H x @

Rs. 45

N = M L

O = N/K

1

GW/10/11

20

34.65

29.8

4.85

693

15

5

447

149

97

31185

7380

20115

12735

40.83%

2

GW/10/11

20

34.72

29.92

4.8

694.4

14

6

418.88

179.52

96

31248

8265.6

18849.6

10584

33.87%

3

GW/10/11

20

34.71

30.1

4.61

694.2

16

4

481.6

120.4

92.2

31239

6378

21672

15294

48.95%

4

GW/10/11

20

34.59

29.92

4.67

691.8

15

5

448.8

149.6

93.4

31131

7290

20196

12906

41.45%

5

GW/10/11

20

34.69

29.88

4.81

693.8

16

4

478.08

119.52

96.2

31221

6471.6

21513.6

15042

48.17%

6

GW/10/11

20

34.75

29.93

4.82

695

14

6

419.02

179.58

96.4

31275

8279.4

18855.9

10576.5

33.81%

7

GW/10/11

20

34.67

29.9

4.77

693.4

15

5

448.5

149.5

95.4

31203

7347

20182.5

12835.5

41.13%

8

GW/10/11

20

34.85

30.18

4.67

697

15

5

452.7

150.9

93.4

31365

7329

20371.5

13042.5

41.58%

9

GW/10/11

20

34.58

29.98

4.6

691.6

15

5

449.7

149.9

92

31122

7257

20236.5

12979.5

41.70%

10

GW/10/11

20

34.66

30.1

4.56

693.2

16

4

481.6

120.4

91.2

31194

6348

21672

15324

49.12%

Average

20

34.687

29.971

4.716

693.74

15.1

4.9

452.588

146.832

94.32

32218.3

7234.56

20366.46

13131.9

42.06%

Appendix II:Cost Analysis by using proposed gating system

Sr. No.

Heat No

Casting Produced

Bunch Weight of

each

Bare weight of

each

Weight of gating

Total weight of

bunch

No of casting

accepted

No of casting

rejected

Total weight of

accepted

Total weight

rejected

Total weight of

gating

Total production

cost

Refund cost due to

rejection

Total price of accepted

casting

Productivity in Rs.

Percentage of total

productivity

A

B

C

D = B-C

E = A x B

F

G

H = C x F

I = C x G

J = A x D

K = E x @

Rs. 45

L = (I+J) x

@ Rs. 30

M = H x @

Rs. 45

N = M L

O = N/K

1

GW/04/12

20

32.8

30.6

2.2

656

18

2

550.8

61.2

44

29520

3156

24786

21630

73.27%

2

GW/04/12

20

32.44

29.8

2.64

648.8

18

2

536.4

59.6

52.8

29196

3372

24138

20766

71.12%

3

GW/04/12

20

32.1

29.9

2.2

642

19

1

568.1

29.9

44

28890

2217

25564.5

23347.5

80.81%

4

GW/04/12

20

32.48

30.18

2.3

649.6

18

2

513.06

60.36

46

29232

3190.8

23087.7

19896.9

68.06%

5

GW/04/12

20

32.55

30.1

2.45

651

19

1

571.9

30.1

49

29295

2373

25735.5

23362.5

79.74%

6

GW/04/12

20

32.62

30.19

2.43

652.4

18

2

543.42

60.38

48.6

29358

3269.4

24453.9

21184.5

72.15%

7

W/04/12

20

32.38

29.9

2.48

647.6

18

2

538.2

59.8

49.6

29142

3282

24219

20937

71.84%

8

GW/04/12

20

32.62

30.18

2.44

652.4

18

2

543.24

60.36

48.8

29358

3274.8

24445.8

21171

72.11%

9

GW/04/12

20

32.46

29.98

2.48

649.2

19

1

569.62

29.98

49.6

29214

2387.4

25632.9

23245.5

79.56%

10

GW/04/12

20

32.51

29.94

2.57

650.2

18

2

538.92

59.88

51.4

29259

3338.4

24251.4

20913

71.47%

Average

20

32.496

30.077

2.419

649.92

18.3

1.7

547.366

51.156

48.38

29246.4

2986.08

24631.47

21645.39

74.01%

APPENDIX III: Photo copies for types of defects observed by using existing gating system

IJERTV3IS100073

www.ijert.org 79

Leave a Reply