- Open Access
- Total Downloads : 702
- Authors : Shashank V. Gulhane, Rahul M. Dahekar
- Paper ID : IJERTV3IS100073
- Volume & Issue : Volume 03, Issue 10 (October 2014)
- Published (First Online): 07-10-2014
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
To Improve Productivity for Casting Technology By Reducing Weight of Gating System
Shashank V. Gulhane
Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering Department G.W.C.E.T, Nagpur
Rahul M. Dahekar
Assistant Professor in Mechanical Engineering Department G.W.C.E.T, Nagpur
Abstract One of the key elements to make a metal casting of high quality is the design of a good gating system. The gating system refers to those channels through which the metal flows from the ladle to the mold cavity. The use of a good gating system is even more important if a casting is produced by a gravity process. If poor gating techniques are used, invariably, lower casting quality is achieved, because of damage on the molten metal received during the flow through the gating system. It could be even worse, if the molten material is a sensitive metal for receiving damage during the filling, because of dross and slag formation. The purpose of this study is to identify the problem associated with gating system for the manufacturing of ginning dead weight which is used for their machineries at Jadhao Steel Alloys, Amravati. The typical casting defects were identified at M/s Jadhao Steel Alloys, Amravati in which the shrinkage defect ,blow holes, pin holes, gas holes, sand inclusion and misrun defects etc. are prominent. The total percentage of defect is around 25-30 % of the total casting produced. It means total % of rejection is around 25- 30% which is very high and not acceptable. After careful investigation of the casting process, it was found that all the above defects can be considerably reduced by using a proper gating system. Hence optimization of gating system is considered as a main topic of investigation. According to deep study and analysis of existing gating system used by industry, it was found that old gating ratio was incorrect and after gating system calculations it was found that the total of weight of gating system is very high that has to reduce considerably. After careful observation and analysis of existing gating system used by industry, it was decided to make necessary changes in the design and dimension of gating system.By using proposed gating system the experiment has been carried out at Jadhao Steel Alloys, Amravati. The result found after experimentation are very sound and productive. By using standard gating ratio as per ISO, it was found that the total percentage of productivity improved from 42% to 74% by reducing total weight of gating system from 4.68 kg to 2.39 kg with reducing total percentage of rejection from 25% – 30% to 7.5% – 10%, With % of yield increases from 86% to 92%, with keeping flow laminar through all sections of gating system which is most essential to reduce casting defects.
Keywordscasting; gating system; mould cavity; productivity, casting defects.
INTRODUCTION
GATING SYSTEM
The term gating system includes all the passage ways through which molten metal enters in to the mould cavity. The gating system is made up of the following parts:
-
a) Pouring basin b) Sprue c) Runner bar d) In gates e) Riser
Fig. 1. Gating system 3D
The design of gating system is important and the main requisites of gating system are: The gating should be so designed that it avoids the mould or core erosion by reducing metal velocity within the cavity and avoiding direct impingement on mould walls or cores. The flow of metal to the mould cavity should occur with as minimum as possible turbulence, because if turbulence is excessive, the aspiration of mould gases will occur which will oxidize the mould metal.
The flow of molten metal must be laminar so as to reduce the casting defects like shrinkage, porosity, blow holes, gas holes, misrun, sand inclusion etc.
IMPORTANCE OF GATING SYSTEM
The design of gating system is as important as rise ring of a steel casting. It is well known that improper gating practice can result in defects like , ceroXide, inclusions, cold shuts, misruns, hot tears, local shrinkages, and gas cavities in a steel casting. A gating system should be pre-designed and incorporated in method drawing as is the case of rise ring and not left to the discretion of the molder.
CONSTITUENTS OF GATING SYSTEM
A gating system for steel castings can be broadly divided into: – The entry section consisting of the pouring basin, sprue and sprue base. The distribution section consists of the runners and in gates.
FUNCTIONS OF A GATING SYSTEM
The entry section of a gating has two functions:-
-
To supply liquid metal free of entrapped gases, slag and eroded sand.
-
To establish a hydraulic pressure head, this will force the metal through the rest of the gating system and into the casting.
The distribution section has five functions:-
-
To decrease the velocity of the metal stream, to minimize turbulence, both in the gating system as well as in the mold cavity.
-
To avoid mold and core erosion, to establish the best possible thermal gradient in the casting,
-
To regulate the rate of flow of metal into the mold cavity.
In addition to these, the gating system should be of such simple design as to facilitate molding, particularly with mechanical methods, at the same time involving minimum fettling cost and affording maximum casting yield. Many of these requirements and functions are conflicting with each other. Effort should be to harmonize these so as to create conditions conducive to the production of a defect free casting.
PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION
During our industrial visit at M/s Jadhao Steel Alloys, Amravati it was found that so many types of steel casting jobs are produced. The typical casting defects observed like Shrinkage, Blow Holes, Pin Holes, Gas Holes, Sand Inclusion, Misrun etc. are prominent. It was found that industry was facing the problem of rejection particularly for ginning weight steel casting used as dead weight for their machineries.
Following table shows the inspection report for ginning weight at quality desk.
After observation of inspection report and discussion had with GM production Jadhao Steel Alloys, Amravati regarding with the percentage of rejection and various casting defects observed for the manufacturing of Ginning weight which is use as a dead weight for ginning machine it was decided to follow actual procedure of casting manufacturing in relation with the gating system used. In order to reduce percentage of rejection and casting defects. It was decided to study and analysis of existing Gating System used by industry.
STUDY AND ANALYSIS OF EXISTING GATING SYSTEM
The study and analysis of existing Gating System and Proposed Gating System for the manufacturing of Ginning Dead Weight at Jadhao Steel Alloys Amravati. The main objective of this study is to follow standard casting procedure in relation with standard gating system as per researchers research in the field of casting technology. As per the discussions with Mr. G. M. (PROD.) at Jadhao Steel Alloys Amravati regarding with casting defects and percentage of rejection for the manufacturing of ginning dead weight, it was observed that all the above defects can be considerably reduced by using a proper gating system. Hence optimization of gating system is considered as a main topic of investigation.
GINNING DEAD WEIGHT
Ginning dead weight used as a dead weight for ginning machine which is agro based machine. To provide extra load on machine during vibration of ginning machine in order to remove cotton seeds from cotton fiber
Fig. 2. Ginning Weight
TABLE I: Inspection report for GW. By using existing gating system
Job Qty
shrink age
Blow holes & gas holes
Sand inclusion
Misrun
Total
% of rejection
20
3
2
1
6
30%
20
1
1
1
2
5
25%
20
1
1
1
1
4
20%
20
2
2
1
–
5
25%
20
2
1
–
2
5
25%
20
1
3
1
–
5
25%
Average percentage of rejection is around 25% to 30%
DIMESIONAL DRAWING OF GINING WEIGHT
Fig. 3. Dimensional Drawing Of Ginning Weight
DESIGN & DIMENSION OF EXISTING GATING SYSTEM
As per the discussion had with G. M. (PROD.) at Jadhao Steel Alloys Amravati regarding with casting defects and percentage of rejection for the manufacturing of ginning dead weight, it was observed that all the above defects can be considerably reduced by using a proper gating system. Hence optimization of gating system is considered as a main topic of investigation. In order to reduce casting defects it was decided to follow deep study and analysis of existing gating system.
Fig. 4. Design and Dimension of Existing Gating System
Total volume of gating = 6.51 × 10-4 m3
Total weight of gating = Total volume of gating × density
= 6.51×104×7.2×103
= 4.68 kg
GATING RATIO AND ITS CALCULATIONS FOR EXISTING GATING SYSTEM
The typical gating system made by industry found typical casting defects which has increased percentage of rejection and which has affected productivity. In order to reduce percentage of rejection it was decided to follow standard gating ratio as per ISO in foundry technology.
Gating ratio: – The rate of flow of molten metal through the sprue is a function of the cross sectional areas of the sprue, runners and in gates. Gating ratios recommended by various theoreticians in the literature vary over a wide range. The Dimensional characteristics of any gating system can be generally expressed in terms of gating ratio.
TABLE II: Gating area with Dimension for existing gating system.
Sr. No.
Part
Existing Gating System Dimensions (mm)
Existing Gating Area
(mm2 )
1
Sprue
D1= 20
D2= 25
491
2
Runner
L= 60, H= 65,
T= 23
920
3
In gates
L=30, H=15, w=40, L=30, H=5, W=40
1050
Gating ratio becomes 1:1.87:2.13
But as per standard gating ratio suggested by many researchers (i.e. 1:2:1, 1:2:0.5, 1:4:1, 2:7:1) for grey cast iron. Hence obtained gating ratio is not matched with standard gating ratio as per researchers in foundry technology.
PROPOSED GATING SYSTEM
According to deep study and analysis of existing gating system it was found that industry has used improper gating system. The result found after calculation and analysis of existing gating system are very typical in which, gating ratio 1:1.87:2.13 which is not matched with standard gating ratio as per researchers research in foundry technology. The further result after calculation of existing gating system are, the weight of gating system is around 4.7 Kg. which is very high it has to reduce considerably. Along with this calculation it was found that the flow pattern for existing gating system is laminar. On the basis of above results found for existing gating system it was decided to made necessary changes in the dimensions of runner and in gates with riser in order to maintain standard gating ratio as per researchers research in foundry technology. Necessary changes in the dimensions of runner and in gates with riser proposed in order to maintain standard gating ratio as per researchers in foundry technology and to reduce total weight of gating system in order to improve total productivity.
TABLE III: Gating area with Dimension for existing & proposed gating system
Section
Existing gating volume in
(m3)
Existing gating weight in
(kg)
Proposed gating in (m3)
Proposed gating weight in
(kg)
Sprue
-5
-3
-5
-3
4.19 X10
301.68X10
4.19 X10
301.68X10
Runner
-5
6.712 X10
483.264
-3
X10
–
7.2956X10
5
0.5252
In gates
-6
-3
-6
-3
72 X10
518.4X10
14.4X10
103.68X10
Riser
-4
5 X10
3.6
-4
2.034 X10
1.4646
TOTAL
4.68 kg
2.398 kg
GATING RATIO AND CALCULATION FOR PROPOSED GATING SYSTEM
According to changes in the dimensions of existing gating system, the followings calculations are made in order to maintain standard gating ratio.
With these calculations for proposed gating system gating ratio will be equal to
Cross sectional area of sprue = 491mm2 Cross sectional area of runner = 1000 mm2 Cross sectional area of in gates = 505 mm2
Therefore 491: 1000: 505 = 1: 2.03: 1.02
TABLE IV: Gating area for existing & proposed gating system
Sr. No
Part
Existing Gating System Dimension
s (mm)
Proposed Gating System Dimensions
(mm)
Existing Gating Area
2
(mm )
Proposed Gating Area
2
(mm )
1
Sprue
D1= 20
, D2= 25
D1= 20,
D2= 25
491
491
2
Runner
L= 60, H=
65,
T= 23
L= 60, H=
65,
T= 25
920
1000
3
In gates
L=30 H=15,w=4 0,
L=30, H=5,
W=40
L=20, H=12,w=30
,L=5, W=20,H=5
1050
505
Gating ratio becomes (1:1.87:2.13)(1:2.03:1.03)
Hence It was found that proposed gating ratio, becomes (1:2.03:1.02) is matched with std. gating ratio i.e. 1:2:1 as per researchers research in foundry technology.
FLOW PATTERN ANALYSIS IN BETWEEN PROPOSED & EXISTING GATING SYSTEM
According to necessary changes in the design & dimension of existing gating system it was found that the proposed gating ratio matched with standard gating ratio & the total weight of gating system reduced from 4.7 kg to 2.4 kg. In order to reduced casting defects and percentage of rejection it was decided to check flow pattern for the proposed gating system. Following are the calculations made to check molten metal flow pattern for the individual sectio of proposed gating system.
TABLE V: Comparative analysis of flow pattern in between proposed and existing gating system
Section
For Existing Gating System
For Proposed Gating System
Flow pattern
Reynolds Number
Mean Velocity in m/s
Reynolds Number
Mean Velocit y in m/s
Sprue
580
4.214
580
4.214
Laminar
Runner
108
1.3756
103
1.3040
Laminar
In gates
141
3.5877
265
6.7270
Laminar
Riser
96
0.6966
246
1.7845
Laminar
The above comparative analysis for flow pattern and mean velocity in between existing and proposed gating system produced flow pattern is laminar through all typical section of existing and proposed gating system with typical
variation in mean velocity because of changes in the dimension of existing gating system. In order to reduce various casting defects by using existing gating system this flow pattern analysis plays an important role during manufacturing of Ginning Dead Weight.
EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS, ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION
By using proposed gating system the experiments has been carried out at Jadhao Steel Alloys, Amravati. The result found after experimentation are very sound and productive. By using standard gating ratio as per ISO, it was found that the total weight of gating system reduced from
4.68 kg to 2.39 kg with reducing total percentage of rejection from 25% – 30% to 7.5% – 10%, With % of yield increases from 86% to 92%, with productivity increases from 42% to 74%, with keeping flow laminar through all sections of gating system which is most essential to reduce casting defects.
INSPECTION REPORT
TABLE VI: Inspection Report by using proposed gating system
Job Qty
Blow holes
shrinka ge
Gas holes & pin
holes
Sand inclusion
Misrun
Total
% of defects
20
–
–
–
1
1
2
10%
20
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
20
–
–
1
–
–
1
5%
20
–
–
–
1
1
2
10%
20
1
–
1
2
10%
20
–
–
–
2
–
2
10%
Average percentage of rejection is around 5% to 10%
ACTUAL WEIGHT OF EXISTING & PROPOSED GATING SYSTEM
TABLE VII: Comparison for Actual weight of existing & proposed gating system
Section
Existing gating volume in
(m3)
Existing gating weight in (kg)
Proposed gating in (m3)
Proposed gating weight in (kg)
Sprue
-5
-3
-5
-3
4.19 X10
301.68X10
4.19 X10
301.68X10
–
Runner
6.712 X10
5
-3
483.264 X10
-5
7.2956X10
0.5252
In gates
-6
72 X10
-3
518.4X10
-6
14.4X10
-3
103.68X10
Riser
-4
5 X10
3.6
-4
2.034 X10
1.4646
TOTAL
4.68 kg
2.398 kg
According to necessary changes in the design & dimension of existing gating system it was found that the
proposed gating ratio matched with standard gating ratio & the total weight of gating system reduced from 4.7 kg to 2.4 kg. This is most economical for every manufacturing industry in mass production.
The above comparative analysis for flow pattern and mean velocity in between existing and proposed gating system produced flow pattern is laminar through all typical section of existing and proposed gating system with typical variation in mean velocity because of changes in the dimension of existing gating system.
BUNCH WEIGHT ANALYSIS
TABLE VIII: Bunch Weight analysis after experimentation by using proposed gating system
Sr. No
Batch No.
Bunch weight in
Kg
Casting weight
in Kg
Gating weight in
Kg
%
yield
1
GW/2012/04
32.800
30.600
2.200
93.29
2
GW/2012/04
32.440
29.800
2.64
91.86
3
GW/2012/04
32.100
29.900
2.2
93.14
4
GW/2012/04
32.480
30.180
2.3
92.91
5
GW/2012/04
32.550
30.100
2.45
92.47
6
GW/2012/04
32.620
30.190
2.43
92.55
7
GW/2012/04
32.380
29.900
2.48
92.34
8
GW/2012/04
32.620
30.180
2.44
92.51
9
GW/2012/04
32.460
29.980
2.48
92.35
10
GW/2012/04
32.510
29.940
2.57
92.09
Average
32.40
30
2.4
92
The bunch weight analysis by using proposed gating system produced the average weight of casting found 30 kg with average bunch weight of casting found 32.40 which produced average percentage of yield 92% with average weight of existing gating system 2.4 kg.
Sr. No
Batch No.
Bunch
weight in Kg
Casting
weight in Kg
Gating
weight in Kg
%
yield
1
GW/2011/10
34.650
29.800
4.85
86.00
2
GW/2011/10
34.720
29.920
4.8
86.17
3
GW/2011/10
34.710
30.100
4.61
86.71
4
GW/2011/10
34.590
29.920
4.67
86.49
5
GW/2011/10
34.690
29.880
4.81
86.13
6
GW/2011/10
34.750
29.930
4.82
86.12
7
GW/2011/10
34.670
29.900
4.77
86.24
8
GW/2011/10
34.850
30.180
4.67
86.59
9
GW/2011/10
34.580
29.980
4.6
86.69
10
GW/2011/10
34.660
30.100
4.56
86.84
Average
34.687
29.971
4.716
86%
TABLE IX: Bunch Weight Analysis for existing gating system
The average weight of casting found 29.971 kg with average bunch weight of casting found 34.687 which produced average percentage of yield 86% with average weight of existing gating system 4.716 kg.
The typical bunch weight analysis in between existing and proposed gating system produced percentage of yield increases from 86% to 92% which is most economical for manufacturing industry.
COST ANALYSIS IN BETWEEN EXISTING AND PROPOSED GATING SYSTEM TO MEASURE TOTAL PRODUCTIVITY
This cost analysis in between existing and proposed gating system produced percentage of productivity increases from 42% to 74% which is most essential for every manufacturing industry. (See Appendix)
DISSCUSSION
The purpose of this study is to identify the problem associated with gating system for the manufacturing of ginning dead weight which is used for their machineries at Jadhao Steel Alloys Amravati. After observation, inspection and analysis of every factor of gating system it has found that, the small change in the dimension of gating system results large effects on the production cost. The average total percentage of rejection for existing gating system is around 25% to 30% of total casting produced. The average total percentage of rejection for proposed gating system is around 7.5% to 10% of total casting produced. This major change in the average percentage of rejection plays an effective role on production cost. After careful investigation of the casting process, it was found that all the above defects can be considerably reduced by using a proper gating system. Hence optimization of gating system is considered as a main topic of investigation.
The number of factors influencing the gating design is numerous. But out of all these factors can be considered as a important one. According to deep study and analysis It was decided to follow standard gating ratio as per ISO suggested by many researchers in the field of casting .In order to maintain standard gating ratio It was found that old gating ratio was incorrect. After gating system calculation it was found that the total weight of gating system is very high, that has to considerably reduce. After careful observation and analysis it was decided to make necessary changes in the design and dimension of gating system.
By using proposed gating system the experiments has been carried out at Jadhao Steel Industry, Amravati. The result found after experimentation are very sound and productive. By using standard gating ratio as per ISO, it was found that the total percentage of productivity improved from 42% to 74% by reducing total weight of gating system from
4.68 kg to 2.39 kg with reducing total percentage of rejection from 25% – 30% to 7.5% – 10%, With % of yield increases
from 86% to 92%, with keeping flow laminar through all sections of gating system which is most essential to reduce casting defects.
CONCLUSION
The typical changes in design and dimension of gating system play a crucial role during manufacturing of casting product. After observation, inspection and analysis of every factor of gating system it has found that, the small change in the dimension of gating system results large effects on the production cost. The target or motto of project is to reduce casting Defects, to reduce % of rejection and to reduce weight of gating system in order to achieve maximum productivity which is most essential for every manufacturing industry
The result found after experimentation are very sound and productive .By using standard gating ratio as per researchers research in foundry technology, it was found that the total percentage of productivity improved from 42% to 74% by reducing weight of gating system from 4.68kg to
2.39 kg with reducing total percentage of rejection from 25%
-
-
30% to 7.5% – 10% , with increasing % of yield from 86% to 92% with keeping flow laminar through all sections of gating system which is most essential to reduce casting defects.
To design a gating system for steel casting standard gating ratio plays a crucial role during manufacturing. In ordered to reduce casting defects & percentage of rejections, typical optimization technique must be follow. Design of typical elements of gating system must be produced optimum weight of gating system. Flow pattern analysis is very important in order to check molten metal flow pattern is laminar or turbulent during casting with optimum velocity of molten metal in order to reduce various casting defects. To optimize the gating system for steel casting percentage of yield and percentage of productivity must be improve.
REFERENCES
-
Shamsuddin Sulalman and Tham Chee Keen, department of mechanical and systems engineering university pertanian malaysia, serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. Flow analysis along the runner and gating system of a casting process. Journal of material processing technology. Vol. 63 (1997) 690-695.
-
B. Senthilkumar, S.G. Ponnambalam, N. Jawahar. Process factor optimization for controlling pull-down defects in iron castings Published by Elsevier B.V., 2008.
-
Zhizhong Sun, Henry Hu, Xiang Chen, casting with multiple performance characteristics Numerical optimization of gating system parameters for a magnesium alloy Published by Elsevier B.V., 2007.
-
Chinmay Das, Manufacturing Science-I, Casting defects, NPTEL website 2004.
-
Carlos E. Esparza NEMAK S.A. de C.V. Libramiento Arco Vial, Optimal Design of Gating Systems by Gradient Search Methods, Km. 3.8 GarcÃa, NL 66000, México December 2004 Revised April 2005.
-
P. R Beeley P.R, 'Foundry Technology', The Butteworth Group (London Butterworths), (1972).
-
P. N. Rao, Manufacturing Technology, TMH Publication, page 195 -198.
-
A. Ghosh and A. K. Mallik, Manufacturing Science, East-West Press Private Limited, page 90-92.
-
Kalpakjian and Schmid, Pearson Education, Manufacturing Engineering and Technology, page 253-254.
-
E. P. Deganno, Y. T. Black and R. A. Kohser, 'Materials and Processes in Manufacturing', Mac Millan Publishing Co. 7th Edition (1990).
-
T. R. Vijayaram, S. Sulaiman, A. M. S. Hamouda, M. H. M. Ahmad, 2006. Foundry quality control aspects and prospects to reduce scrap rework and rejection in metal casting manufacturing industries. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 178, 13.
-
R. E. Swift, J. H. Jackson, L. W. Eastwood, 1949. A study of principles of gating. AFS Trans. 57, 7688.
IJERTV3IS100073
www.ijert.org 78
APPENDIX
Appendix I:Cost Analysis by using existing gating system
Sr. No |
Heat No. |
Casting Produced |
Bunch Weight of each casting |
Bare weight of each casting |
Weight of gating |
otal weight of bunch casting |
No of casting accepted |
No of casting rejected |
Total weight of accepted casting |
Total weight rejected casting |
Total weight of gating |
Total production cost |
Refund cost due to rejection and gating |
Total price of accepted casting |
Productivity in Rs. |
Percentage of total productivity |
A |
B |
C |
D = B – C |
E = A x B |
F |
G |
H = C x F |
I = C x G |
J = A x D |
K = E x @ Rs. 45 |
L = (I+J) x @ Rs. 30 |
M = H x @ Rs. 45 |
N = M L |
O = N/K |
||
1 |
GW/10/11 |
20 |
34.65 |
29.8 |
4.85 |
693 |
15 |
5 |
447 |
149 |
97 |
31185 |
7380 |
20115 |
12735 |
40.83% |
2 |
GW/10/11 |
20 |
34.72 |
29.92 |
4.8 |
694.4 |
14 |
6 |
418.88 |
179.52 |
96 |
31248 |
8265.6 |
18849.6 |
10584 |
33.87% |
3 |
GW/10/11 |
20 |
34.71 |
30.1 |
4.61 |
694.2 |
16 |
4 |
481.6 |
120.4 |
92.2 |
31239 |
6378 |
21672 |
15294 |
48.95% |
4 |
GW/10/11 |
20 |
34.59 |
29.92 |
4.67 |
691.8 |
15 |
5 |
448.8 |
149.6 |
93.4 |
31131 |
7290 |
20196 |
12906 |
41.45% |
5 |
GW/10/11 |
20 |
34.69 |
29.88 |
4.81 |
693.8 |
16 |
4 |
478.08 |
119.52 |
96.2 |
31221 |
6471.6 |
21513.6 |
15042 |
48.17% |
6 |
GW/10/11 |
20 |
34.75 |
29.93 |
4.82 |
695 |
14 |
6 |
419.02 |
179.58 |
96.4 |
31275 |
8279.4 |
18855.9 |
10576.5 |
33.81% |
7 |
GW/10/11 |
20 |
34.67 |
29.9 |
4.77 |
693.4 |
15 |
5 |
448.5 |
149.5 |
95.4 |
31203 |
7347 |
20182.5 |
12835.5 |
41.13% |
8 |
GW/10/11 |
20 |
34.85 |
30.18 |
4.67 |
697 |
15 |
5 |
452.7 |
150.9 |
93.4 |
31365 |
7329 |
20371.5 |
13042.5 |
41.58% |
9 |
GW/10/11 |
20 |
34.58 |
29.98 |
4.6 |
691.6 |
15 |
5 |
449.7 |
149.9 |
92 |
31122 |
7257 |
20236.5 |
12979.5 |
41.70% |
10 |
GW/10/11 |
20 |
34.66 |
30.1 |
4.56 |
693.2 |
16 |
4 |
481.6 |
120.4 |
91.2 |
31194 |
6348 |
21672 |
15324 |
49.12% |
Average |
20 |
34.687 |
29.971 |
4.716 |
693.74 |
15.1 |
4.9 |
452.588 |
146.832 |
94.32 |
32218.3 |
7234.56 |
20366.46 |
13131.9 |
42.06% |
Appendix II:Cost Analysis by using proposed gating system
Sr. No. |
Heat No |
Casting Produced |
Bunch Weight of each |
Bare weight of each |
Weight of gating |
Total weight of bunch |
No of casting accepted |
No of casting rejected |
Total weight of accepted |
Total weight rejected |
Total weight of gating |
Total production cost |
Refund cost due to rejection |
Total price of accepted casting |
Productivity in Rs. |
Percentage of total productivity |
A |
B |
C |
D = B-C |
E = A x B |
F |
G |
H = C x F |
I = C x G |
J = A x D |
K = E x @ Rs. 45 |
L = (I+J) x @ Rs. 30 |
M = H x @ Rs. 45 |
N = M L |
O = N/K |
||
1 |
GW/04/12 |
20 |
32.8 |
30.6 |
2.2 |
656 |
18 |
2 |
550.8 |
61.2 |
44 |
29520 |
3156 |
24786 |
21630 |
73.27% |
2 |
GW/04/12 |
20 |
32.44 |
29.8 |
2.64 |
648.8 |
18 |
2 |
536.4 |
59.6 |
52.8 |
29196 |
3372 |
24138 |
20766 |
71.12% |
3 |
GW/04/12 |
20 |
32.1 |
29.9 |
2.2 |
642 |
19 |
1 |
568.1 |
29.9 |
44 |
28890 |
2217 |
25564.5 |
23347.5 |
80.81% |
4 |
GW/04/12 |
20 |
32.48 |
30.18 |
2.3 |
649.6 |
18 |
2 |
513.06 |
60.36 |
46 |
29232 |
3190.8 |
23087.7 |
19896.9 |
68.06% |
5 |
GW/04/12 |
20 |
32.55 |
30.1 |
2.45 |
651 |
19 |
1 |
571.9 |
30.1 |
49 |
29295 |
2373 |
25735.5 |
23362.5 |
79.74% |
6 |
GW/04/12 |
20 |
32.62 |
30.19 |
2.43 |
652.4 |
18 |
2 |
543.42 |
60.38 |
48.6 |
29358 |
3269.4 |
24453.9 |
21184.5 |
72.15% |
7 |
W/04/12 |
20 |
32.38 |
29.9 |
2.48 |
647.6 |
18 |
2 |
538.2 |
59.8 |
49.6 |
29142 |
3282 |
24219 |
20937 |
71.84% |
8 |
GW/04/12 |
20 |
32.62 |
30.18 |
2.44 |
652.4 |
18 |
2 |
543.24 |
60.36 |
48.8 |
29358 |
3274.8 |
24445.8 |
21171 |
72.11% |
9 |
GW/04/12 |
20 |
32.46 |
29.98 |
2.48 |
649.2 |
19 |
1 |
569.62 |
29.98 |
49.6 |
29214 |
2387.4 |
25632.9 |
23245.5 |
79.56% |
10 |
GW/04/12 |
20 |
32.51 |
29.94 |
2.57 |
650.2 |
18 |
2 |
538.92 |
59.88 |
51.4 |
29259 |
3338.4 |
24251.4 |
20913 |
71.47% |
Average |
20 |
32.496 |
30.077 |
2.419 |
649.92 |
18.3 |
1.7 |
547.366 |
51.156 |
48.38 |
29246.4 |
2986.08 |
24631.47 |
21645.39 |
74.01% |
APPENDIX III: Photo copies for types of defects observed by using existing gating system
IJERTV3IS100073
www.ijert.org 79