Coupled Field Analysis of Space Capsule

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV3IS090665

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Coupled Field Analysis of Space Capsule

Thermostructure Analysis

V.Valli Kavya Sri Harshini

P. G. student, Aerospace Engineering

MLR Institute of Technology Hyderabad, India

Srikanth Sikhakoli Post Graduate, Aerospace Engineering

MLR Institute of Technology Hyderabad, India

  1. Sai Kiran Goud, Alekhya Bojja

    Assistant Professor, Aeronautical Department MLR Institute of Technology Hyderabad, India

    Abstract The detail engineering design of a re- entering space- vehicle heat shield requires the coordinated efforts . The predominant difficulty lies in the definition of thermal-mechanical properties of the heat-shielding material which encounters wide range of temperature conditions during its environmental life cycle. The conventional space capsules use liners and foam bricks as insulators to resist the temperature of aerodynamic heating.

    These conventional liners and foam bricks can be replaced with insulating material which has good structural properties. This paper presents the coupled field analysis of conventional space capsule using Zirconium Diboride (ZrB2) and Hafnium Diboride (HfB2) as insulating material. The coupled field analysis is carried out using finite element analysis software ANSYS. The analysis resulted that insulating material absorbs the temperatures before reaching the CFRP structure.

    Keywords Space Capsule ; Coupled field analysis; ANSYS; CATIAV5.

    approaches the relatively dense atmosphere a strong bow shock takes place ahead of the vehicle detached from its nose[1].

    1. INTRODUCTION

      Space capsules are the compartments designed to support humans during their journey through space. The space capsule must also protect astronauts from the cold and radiation of space. Space capsules are well-suited to high- temperature and dynamic loading reentries. The space capsule must be strong enough to slow down quickly, must endure extremely high or low temperatures, and must survive the landing. Capsules are well insulated and contain systems to adjust the internal temperature. To design and build a space capsule that will survive re-entry through the Earth's atmosphere one should have the knowledge of the forces of gravity and acceleration along with test design trials. The space capsule experiences two biggest forces namely gravity and drag. Capsules reenter aft-end first with the occupants lying down, as this is the optimum position for the human body to withstand the decelerative g-force. As objects fall, they pick up momentum or accelerate until they impact the surface. When the space capsule comes through the atmosphere the capsule compresses the air in front of it which heats up to very high temperatures. Planets with atmospheres will create friction (and heat) with the spacecraft, which will slow re-entry down a small amount. Typically during a planetary reentry, when a capsule or a space vehicle

      Figure 1: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Versus Newtonian Flow

      Low-radius leading edges are subject to much greater aerodynamic heating than blunt edges, such as those on the Space Shuttle, and they thus will reach temperatures that may exceed 2000°C during reentry [2]. The flexible bottom structure of a space capsule is the heat-shield that may be made of sandwiched composites [3]. The qualities of Hafnium Diboride (HfB2) (melting temperature of 3250°C) and Zirconium Diboride (ZrB2) (melting temperature of 3246°C) [1].

    2. METHODOLOGY

      The blunt nose profile is taken as the shape of space capsule and different materials are applied on the surface. The top 4 layers of the surface are applied with Hafnium Diboride (HfB2) and Zirconium Diboride (ZrB2) alternately and base material is taken as carbon epoxy. The material properties of these composites are shown in the table 1.

      S .NO

      Material Property

      Carbon

      Epoxy composite

      Hafnium

      Diboride (Hfb2)

      Zirconium

      Diboride (Zrb2)

      1

      E(N/mm2 )

      1.81e5

      0.75e5

      4.2e5

      2

      1/m

      0.36

      0.37

      0.34

      3

      (kg/mm3)

      1.7e-6

      10.5e-6

      6.085e-6

      4

      (0k-1)

      2e-6

      7.6E-6

      8.3e-6

      5

      K W/mm-

      K)

      7e-3

      62e-3

      70e-3

      V-A-E-L-K-N

      U ACEL

      SEP 14 2014

      13:19:48

      1

      Table-1: Material Properties

    3. FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING AND ANALYSIS

      1. Design

        The Space Capsule is modeled using CATIA V5 software to get a profile shape. The spline model is created and is imported to ANSYS into a new co-ordinate system (11- cordinate system) created using the three KP (key points) and is meshed.

        Y

        11

        Z X

        File: profile 2

        YY

        ZZ XX

        Figure-4: Applied Pressure with Gravity

    4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

      The below figure shows the results of the nodal temperatures obtained from the thermal analysis of the space capsule. From the result obtained we can say that the temperature is getting decreased through the thickness which proves that the insulation material that we have selected is appropriate.

      1. Analysis

      Figure -2: Profile Shape.

      NODAL SOLUTION STEP=1

      1

      SUB =1 TIME=1

      TEMP (AVG) RSYS=0

      SMN =308

      SMX =2798

      JUL 21 2014

      17:00:02

      The thermal and static analysis is done on the space capsule by applying composites. The thermal analysis is done by applying

      308

      File: profile

      584.667

      861.333

      1138

      1414.67

      1691.33

      1968

      2244.67

      2521.33

      2798

      1

      temperature of 2798 k on top layers and temperature 305k on base material. The results obtained in the thermal analysis are applied for the space capsule in structural analysis.

      ELEMENTS

      U ROT

      TEMPERATURES TMIN=298 TMAX=2798

      JUN 15 2014

      13:03:09

      Y

      11 X

      Z

      298

      File: profile

      575.778 1131.33 1686.89 2242.44 2798

      2520.22

      1964.67

      1409.11

      853.556

      Figure-3: Applied Boundary Conditions

      Figure-5: Nodal Temperature Results

      The blunt nose cone is designed by 8 thermal protection layers applying Carbon Epoxy composite, Hafnium Diboride (HfB2) and Zirconium Diboride (ZrB2) composite materials with different angle orientations listed as below in the table 2.

      S. No

      Thickness

      Material-

      Id

      Orientation

      Integration

      Pts

      1

      0.25

      1

      90

      3

      2

      0.25

      1

      45

      3

      3

      0.25

      1

      -45

      3

      4

      0.25

      1

      90

      3

      5

      0.25

      2

      0

      3

      6

      0.25

      3

      0

      3

      7

      0.25

      2

      0

      3

      8

      0.25

      3

      0

      3

      Table-2: Lay-Up Orientations

      The thermal loads, gravity loads and pressure loads are applied stage wise to get the results in the static structural analyses which are listed in the table 3.

    5. CONCLUSION

The coupled field analysis done on the space capsule resulted that the Hafnium Diboride (HfB2) and Zirconium Diboride (ZrB2) are acting as good insulating materials for the high temperatures and are absorbing the temperatures before reaching the CFRP material. So the problem of using conventional liners and foam bricks is avoided. This analysis also shows that the carbon epoxy material can sustain the thermal protection system located in the inner surfaces of the CFRP.

NAME

WITH OUT GRAVITY

WITH GRAVITY

WITH GRAVITY

& APPLIED PRESSURE

Displacement

Vector Sum

0.201375

0.213668

0.541876

Displacement-

X

0.201313

0.213227

0.54057

Displacement

Y

0.076791

0.090811

0.18233

Displacement

Z

0.091868

0.069094

0.21131

Stress X

1348.18

1760.38

8360.26

Stress Y

1255.22

1394.64

9336.24

Stress Z

1313.52

1801.28

7530.1

Shear stress-XY

557.94

585.546

5572.7

Shear stress-YZ

538.872

578.92

4478.06

Shear stress-XZ

663.773

429.993

5588.75

Von-mises

stress

16142.12

2038.33

13782

REFERENCES

N. Sreenivasa Babu, Dr. K. Jayathirtha Rao [1]. [2] Aerodynamic and Heat Transfer Analysis over Spherical Blunt Cone Agosh M C [3] John T. Wang1 and Karen H. Lyle footnotes.

Table-3 Comparison Between With Gravity, Without Gravity and Applied Pressure with Gravity

From the results shown in the above table the equivalent stresses acting on the space capsule are less when applied the gravity.

  1. N. Sreenivasa Babu, Dr. K. Jayathirtha Rao Analysis Of Blunt Nose Cone With Ultra High Temperature Ceramic Composite TPS Materials

  2. Agosh M C Aerodynamic And Heat Transfer Analysis Over Spherical Blunt ConeJ. Clerk Maxwell, A Treatise on Electricity and Magnetism, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Oxford: Clarendon, 1892, pp.68-73.

  3. John T. Wang1 and Karen H. Lyle Simulating Space Capsule Water Landing With Explicit Finite Element Method

  4. J. Muylaert, W. Kordulla, D. Giordano, L. Marraffa, R. Schwane

    Aerothermodynamics Analysis Of Space- Vehicle Phenomena

  5. Jack V. Snyder, Caleb C. Barnesy, Jessica L. Rinderley, Oleg V. Shiryayevz And Joseph C. Slaterx Experimental Near Space Free Fall Testing Systems

  6. . A Cooperative Project of the Lunar and Planetary Institute, NASA's Office of Space Science and public libraries SPACE CAPSULE DESIGN

  7. Chapman, Dean. An Analysis of the Corridor and Guidance Requirements for Supercircular Entry Into Planetary Atmospheres. NASA TR R-55, 1960.

  8. Enchanced Thermal Structural Analysis By Integrated Finite Elements By Earl A Thorton & Pramode Dechaumphai

Leave a Reply