Design of Multilevel Inverter to Improve the Power Quality by Reducing the Harmonics

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV3IS080160

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Design of Multilevel Inverter to Improve the Power Quality by Reducing the Harmonics

Vikalp Kulshrestha,1

PG Scholar

Dept. of Electrical Engineering SATI,VIDISHA

Madhya Pradesh, India

Raj Kiran Pandey2

PG Scholar

Dept. of Electrical Engineering SATI,VIDISHA

Madhya Pradesh, India

  1. S. Sharma3

    Associat Professor

    Dept. of Electrical Engineering SATI, Vidisha

    Madhya Pradesh, India

    AbstractMultilevel output voltage source converters are emerging as a new methodology of power converter options for high-power and medium power. The multilevel voltage source converters typically synthesize the staircase voltage wave from several levels of dc Source .this paper present a new method multilevel inverters ,which has the less number of switching devices used and no any capacitor and inductor dependency to smooth output current wave. it comprises input dc source alternatively connected in opposite polarity with an another switching devices and the design has been fully investigated with the help of theoretical analysis, simulations with the MATLAB / SIIMULINK and reduced THD result are shown through the FFT window, comparison with the proposed topology is made against the typical commercial available inverter topology.

    KeywordsMultilevel inverters, MLI, hybrid topologies, asymmetric and symmetric source configuration, CHB, THD.

    1. INTRODUCTION

      In recent years , multilevel inverter dependency has been increasing, it provides lowest harmonic distortion profile, lower switching losses and conduction losses even multilevel provide higher staircase voltage level this output voltage level increased power rating, reduced dv/dt stress of load possibilities, capability of high efficiency and low electromagnetic interference [2-3]. Even Industrial and domestic power demand increasing, also desired for adjusting the requirement of power, moved to renewal energy recourses, multilevel voltage source have vital role to help in convert high power dc to ac, this high power is reached in megawatt range, it is typical to direct connection of high power and medium power to electronics devices, multilevel methodology helps to withstand devices with the high power [1] .

      MLI has given better Total harmonic Distortion (THD) profile and the improve the efficiency instead of increased the system complexity as the gate driver circuit and the large number of electronics devices, capacitor, inductor used hence the system increase the effective cost and reduce the system liability and efficiency. The solution of the above problem is reduction in the number of switches and gate driver circuit. [7]

      The three different type of topology has been seen in commercial used as the 1. Diode clamped MLI (DC-MLI), this method use higher number of clamping diode are required when the number of level increased also typical to control of real power flow 2. flying capacitor MLI (FC-MLI),this topology need higher number of bulky capacitor and required to balance charging and discharging of capacitor, and 3.Cascaded H-Bridge MLI (CHB-MLI), Diode clamped MLI (DC-MLI), a with these methods mostly have to use large number of power electronics switches, as the number of switches increases the switching power loss increases with the electronics devices. Researchers are working on to reduce the component used in the MLI topologies. Asymmetrical voltage sources uses less number of components [1-2].

      In this paper present comparative study among three circuit as 5-level, 7-level, 9-level and classically present topology, gives the performance study mainly focused on the 9-level and give comparison between THD. This proposed method is used less number of power switching devices thats help to reduce switching losses and improve the performance related to the complexity and reliability comparison to the classical present methods, this topology can be say the family of cascaded hybrid bridge (CHB) there reason to say (i)it used the separated DC voltage source from the renewal energy sources where we get the large number of separated DC sources ,(ii)it offers the voltage additive value to increase the voltage level as the asymmetric voltage sources. It shows the opposite polarities DC voltage Sources are connected to the power switching devices, every power switching device shows the work under different switching frequency and voltage stress.

    2. MODIFIED MLI TOPOLOGY

  1. Structure

    Nine level inverter shown below in fig.1. It has the three voltage sources E1=12v, E2=24, E3=12, which use the adding phenomena, gives the different nine level voltage, this voltage source are connected opposite potential with the power switches. and four pair of active power switches which used as main and complementary switch, switch ( Si, Gi ) i=1,2,3,4

    . Where S main switch and G is used as complementary switch. Power switch can be as IGBT or MOSFET with anti parallel diode, there is MOSFET has the higher switching losses so thats why prefer IGBT as switching device.

    TABLE I.SYSTEM PARAMETERS

    System Parameters

    Value

    Reference frequency

    50 Hz

    Carrier frequency

    1200 Hz

    Load resistance

    1

    Load inductance

    3 mH

    DC Source

    E1=12v

    E2=24v

    E3=12v

    Fig.1.Single Phase nine level inverter with three asymmetric voltage source

    1. DESIGNED MATLAB/SIMULINK CIRCUITE

      Fig.1. Main circuit

  2. Working

The working states shows of nine level inverter table no.1 which shows the nine different voltage levels +/-V, +/-2V, +/- 3V, +/-4V, 0V . We have seen that two zero states and remaining eight non zero states after adding build the different nine level voltage, and also four switch conduct continuously in every different state and remaining switches working as in blocking mode. Switch pair showing as main complementary switch and this switch pair has the different switching frequency and voltage stress, for examples V4=12+24+12= 48v gives when S1, S3, G2, G4 conduct simultaneously remaining switch S2, S4, G1, G3 work as in blocking mode.

TABLE II.MODES AND SWITCHING STATES

Level Of Voltage

Modes

Load Voltage[V]

ON State Switches

0

1

0

G1,G2,G3,G 4

E1

2

12

S1,G 2,G 3,G 4

E2

3

24

S3,S4,G1,G2

E1+E2

4

36

S1,S2,S3,G2

E1+E2+E3

5

48

S1,S3,G2,G4

0

6

0

S1,S2,S3,S4

-E1

7

-12

G1,S2,S3,S4

-E2

8

-24

G1,S2,S3,S4

-(E1+E2)

9

-36

G3,G4,G1,S2

-(E1+E2+E3)

10

-48

G1,S4,G3,S2

  1. UNIPOLAR SWITCHING SCHEME Improvement of power quality moved to high freqency

    switching scheme as the available high switching frequency scheme SPWM and SPACE VECTOR PWM, SPWM scheme is easy produce, multicarrier level shift phase disposition pulse width modulation switching scheme used in nine level topology. the scheme is produce different pulse width and higher number of voltage level help to make closer current sine pulse so that produce less THD with least voltage stress

    ,where S2,G2 has higher voltage stress and used fundamental frequency(50hz) , S1,G1 has the least voltage stress,

    Voltage stress of different power switch

    S2, G2 > S3, G3 > S4, G4 >S1, G1

    Fig.2.Refrance and carrier waveform for nine level inverter

    used reference wave (sinusoidal) frequency 50hz and triangle carrier wave (triangle) frequency 1200hz compare with the relational operator result of shows in fig.2 and fig.3.comparsion with the reference gives 1 when reference

    is greater than triangle wave otherwise gives o .this

    switching pulses added to each other get the aggregated

    signal, aggregated signal compare with the constant its output shows the different switching signal.

    Fig.3. Altered signal

    The different gate driver signal for different power Switches, shown in Fig.4

    Fig.4.Switching Pulses for the nine level inverter.

    Fig.5. Switching Scheme in MATLAB canvas.

  2. SIMULATION RESULTS

    Fig.6. Voltage and Current waves of 5 level MLI

    Fig.7. Voltage FFT window of 5 levels MLI

    Fig.8. Current FFT window of 5 levels MLI

    Fig.9. Voltage and Current waves of 7 level MLI

    Fig.10. Voltage FFT window of 7 levels MLI

    Fig.11. Current FFT window of 7 levels MLI

    Fig.12. Voltage and Current waves of 9 level MLI

    Fig.13. Voltage FFT window of 9 levels MLI

    Fig.14. Current FFT window of 9 levels MLI

  3. COMPARATIVE STUDY

    In comparisons of traditional available multi level inverter, and new multi level hybrid inverter, as the number of voltage level increases the simultaneously the power electronics switches and other components also increases such as IGBT, capacitor, inductors and diodes. In case of flying capacitor MLIs are need capacitor balancing which increases the system complexity, even diode clamping MLIs needs higher number of diodes which increases the system cost and Cascaded H-bridge needs higher number of DC source. Overall comparative study shown in the table no.III and table no. IV respectively.

    TABLE III. COMPARISON BETWEEN DIFFERENT LEVELS

    Inverter

    Fundamental voltage[V]

    Frequency [Hz]

    Voltage (THD) %

    Current (THD)

    %

    E1

    E2

    E3

    5-level Inverter

    12v

    12v

    NO

    50

    22.27%

    3.53%

    7-level Inverter

    12v

    24

    NO

    50

    12.35%

    1.12%

    9-level Inverter

    12v

    24v

    12v

    50

    4.27%

    0.77%

    THD of voltage THD of current

    35.64%

    22.27%

    13.45%

    3.53%

    12.35%

    1.12%

    4.27%

    praposed 5- Modified 5- Modified 7- Modified 9- level level level level inverter inverter inverter inverter

    0.77%

    Fig.15. comparison between present classical topology its component.

    TABLE IV. COMPARISON OF ELEMENTS, BETWEEN DIFFERENT COMMERCIAL AVAILABLE INVERTER WITH HYBRID MULTILEVEL INVERTER

    Inverter Configuration

    Diode- Clamp

    Flying- Capacitors

    Cascaded inverters

    New

    Hybrid MLI

    Main switching

    devices

    2(m-1)

    2(m-1)

    2(m-1)

    m-1

    Main diodes

    2(m-1)

    2(m-1)

    2(m-1)

    0

    Clamping diodes

    (m-1)

    (m-2)

    0

    0

    0

    DC bus capacitors

    (m-1)

    (m-1)

    (m-1)/2

    0

    Balancing capacitors

    0

    (m-1) (m-

    2)/2

    0

    0

  4. CONCLUSION

The nine levels inverter reduce the number of elements such as the capacitor, inductor, and diode and increase output voltage level, it helps to reduces the system cost and also improve the total harmonic distortion profile compared with other present classical topology. This configuration of nine level topology uses the asymmetric voltage, thats why it needs less number of DC sources by which reduce number of power switches and its gate driver circuit. even advantage of reduction in requirement of DC sources in system it help to increases fault tolerant capability. This paper present comparative study with in term of effective cost, THD and shows the all analytical comparison. Over all reduce the THD and increase the efficiency.

REFERENCES

  1. Rodriguez J., Lai J.S., Peng F.Z.: Multilevel inverters: A survey of topologies, controls, and applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 724738, Aug. 2002

  2. Gupta, K.K.; Jain, S.; , "Topology for multilevel inverters to attain maximum number of levels from given DC sources," Power Electronics,

    IET , vol.5, no.4, pp.435-446, April 2012

  3. Jih-Sheng Lai , Fang Zheng Peng Multilevel Converters-A New Breed of Power Converters IEEE transactions on industry, VOL. 32, NO. 3, may june 1996.

  4. Malinowski, M.; Gopakumar, K.; Rodriguez, J.; Pérez, M.A.; , "A Survey on Cascaded Multilevel Inverters," Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on , vol.57, no.7, pp.2197-2206, July 2010.

  5. Ebrahim Babaei*, Seyed Hossein Hosseini New cascaded multilevel inverter topology with minimum number of switches Energy Conversion and Management 50 (2009) 27612767

  6. Y. Suresh Anup Kumar Panda Investigation on hybrid cascaded multilevel inverter with reduced dc sources Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 26 (2013) 4959.

  7. Rodriguez J., Franquelo L.G., Kouro S., Leon, J.I., Portillo R.C., Prats M.A.M., Perez M.A.: Multilevel Converters: An Enabling Technology for High-Power Applications. Proceedings of the IEEE , vol.97, no.11, pp.1786-1817, Nov. 2009.

  8. Gupta, K.K.; Jain, S a novel multilevel inverter based on switching Dc source IEEE transactions on industry, VOL. 61, NO. 7, July 2014.

  9. HEMA LATHA JAVVAJI, B. BASAVARAJA Simulation & Analysis of Different Parameters of Various Levels of Cascaded H Bridge Multilevel Inverter 2013 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Postgraduate Research in Microelectronics and Electronics (PrimeAsia).

  10. IEEE Recommended Practices and Requirements for Harmonic Control in Electrical Power Systems IEEE Std 519-1992 (Revision of IEEE Std 519-198

  11. N.A. Rahim, J. Selvaraj*, C. Krismadinata Five-level inverter with dual reference modulation technique for grid-connected PV system Renewable Energy 35 (2010) 712720.

Leave a Reply