- Open Access
- Total Downloads : 241
- Authors : G K Shankarlinge Gowda, Praveen D Y
- Paper ID : IJERTV4IS060273
- Volume & Issue : Volume 04, Issue 06 (June 2015)
- DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV4IS060273
- Published (First Online): 09-10-2015
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Analysis of Support Settlement of G+5 Building ( Conventional and Flat Plate) Subjected to a Lateral Load
G K Shankarlinge Gowda
Professor,
Department of Civil Engineering, BGSIT, Bellur cross, Karnataka
Praveen D Y
M tech student, BGSIT, Bellur cross, Karnataka
Abstract In this paper, the analysis of G+5 commercial building has been analyzed. The building is subjected to an earthquake loading. G+5 models has been modelled using the software ETAB
13.1.2 for a conventional building and building with flat plate and settlement is provided to the columns of the building and it has been analyzed, the results of axial load has been taken and Axial load is then compared for the conventional building and building with flat plate for both no settlement on column and for the settlement of column.
Keywords Axial load, Conventional building, earthquake, flat plate.
INTRODUCTION
, the slab is that in which slab is directly
Conventional structure includes the columns, beams and slab but in case of flat plate
supported on columns without column capital, drop panel or beams.
The settlement is nothing but, during the construction the load from the super structure as well as the sub structures are transferred into underlying soil profile as a result of this stress increases with in the soil mass and the structure undergoes a time dependent vertical settlement.
Figure 1.1 Conventional frame building
Figure 1.2 Building with flat plate
MODELING AND ANALYSIS
The modelling of both G+6 conventional building and building with flat plate has been done using the ETAB13.1.2. For the earthquake analysis, the input values have been taken for the zone 5 from the IS 1893-2002. Analysis also been done for the response spectrum case.
-
Building details
From the below table 1.1 and 1.2 gives the details of the building for both conventional and building with flat plate has been tabulated.
Table 1.1 Details of conventional building
Conventional building
Building
G+5
Total height of building
24m
Height of each story
3m
Column size
300x650mm
Beam size
300x450mm
Slab thickness
150mm
Grade of concrete
M30
Grade of steel
550
Building with flat plate
Building
G+5
Total height of building
24m
Height of each story
3m
Column size
300x650mm
Slab thickness
150mm
Grade of concrete
M30
Grade of steel
550
Table 1.2 Details building with flat plate
-
Loading details for both conventional and building with flat plate
The loading details for these buildings have been taken from the IS 875 part 2 and are tabulated in the below table 1.3
C Results
Table 1.3 Loading details
Dead load
Program calculated
Live load
2kN
Floor finish
1.5kN
Figure 1.3 3D view of G+5 conventional building
Figure 1.4 3D view of G+5 building with flat plate
Figure 1.5 Plan of the building for zero settlement
From the above figure 1.5 shows the plan and location of the column for zero settlement of columns.
Figure 1.6 Plan of the building for 5mm settlement
From the figure 1.6, the settlement of 5mm is provided to the columns from C1 to C18 and rest of the columns have zero settlement.
Table 1.4 Axial loads for 0 settlement and 5mm settlement for conventional building
Column
no
Conventional
building with 0 settlement
Conventional
building with
5mm settlement
C1
426.53
408.93
C2
719.46
699.06
C3
703.85
683.59
C4
703.85
683.59
C5
719.46
699.06
C6
426.53
408.93
C7
678.27
673.17
C8
1193.06
1184.56
C9
1168.25
1159.78
C10
1168.25
1159.78
C11
1193.06
1184.56
C12
678.27
673.17
C13
678.49
787.54
C14
1197.05
1330.73
C15
1170.65
1303.45
C16
1170.65
1303.45
C17
1197.05
1330.73
C18
678.49
787.54
C19
678.49
569.44
C20
1197.05
1063.36
C21
1170.65
1037.85
C22
1170.65
1037.85
C23
1197.05
1063.36
C24
678.49
569.44
C25
678.27
683.37
C26
1193.06
1201.57
C27
1168.25
1176.73
C28
1168.25
1176.73
C29
1193.06
1201.57
C30
678.27
683.37
C31
426.53
444.13
C32
719.46
739.87
C33
703.85
724.12
C34
703.85
724.12
C35
719.46
739.87
C36
426.53
444.13
Table 1.5 Axial loads for 0 settlement and 5mm settlement for building with flat plate
Column
no
Building with
flat plate with 0 settlement
Building with
flat plate with
5mm settlement
C1
282.10
281.36
C2
505.27
503.34
C3
481.98
480.20
C4
481.98
480.20
C5
505.27
503.34
C6
282.10
281.36>
C7
501.07
495.18
C8
1012.20
999.69
C9
963.84
951.38
C10
963.84
951.38
C11
1012.20
999.69
C12
501.07
495.18
C13
479.56
502.57
C14
968.16
1019.88
C15
919.48
969.98
C16
919.48
969.98
C17
968.16
1019.88
C18
479.56
502.57
C19
479.56
456.55
C20
968.16
916.43
C21
919.48
868.97
C22
919.48
868.97
C23
968.16
916.43
C24
479.56
456.55
C25
501.07
506.95
C26
1012.2
1024.72
C27
963.84
976.29
C28
963.84
976.29
C29
1012.20
1024.72
C30
501.07
506.95
C31
282.10
282.85
C32
505.27
507.19
C33
481.98
483.77
C34
481.98
483.77
C35
505.27
507.19
C36
282.10
282.85
From the table 1.4 it has been observed that the axial load for the conventional G+5 building is gradually increases at a rate of 100kN the column C13 to C18
From the table 1.5 it has been observed that the axial load increases at the rate of 50kN from the column C13 to C18, and it has been noted that from the table 1.4 and table 1.5 the axial load is more as compare to the building with flat plate. Due to settlement the axial load is increased gradually on the columns.
REFERENCES
-
Navyashree K, Sahana T S 2012. Use of flat slabs in multi story commercial building situated in high seismic zone.IJRET
-
S S Patil, Rupali A Sigi 2014. Flat slab construction in India. IJEIT
-
Prof K S Sable, Er. V A Ghodechor, Prof S B Kandekar 2012. Comparative study of seismic behavior of multi story flat slab and conventional reinforced concrete frame structure.
-
Figure 1.1 and 1.2 were taken from the Google images
-