The Effect of the Different Substrates and Size of the Module’s Cells in the Morphological Parameters of the Pepper Seedlings’ (Capsicum Annuum L.)

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV5IS110181

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

The Effect of the Different Substrates and Size of the Module’s Cells in the Morphological Parameters of the Pepper Seedlings’ (Capsicum Annuum L.)

Skender Ramadani1 Agriculture University of Tirana, Tirana, Albania

Thoma Nasto2, Vahid Avdiu3 Gyrner Murati4

2,4Agriculture University of Tiran; 3Faculty of Agriculture & Veterinary, University of Pristina,

2,4Tirana, Albania; 3Pristina, Kosovo

Abstract – The objective of the study was evaluation of the impact of combinations of substrates and volume modules on some morphological parameters of pepper seedling. The experiment was conducted in 2011 in Shtime, Kosovo. Seeds were planted in polisterol modules with volume combinations as follows: 75 ml volumes; 55 ml and 25 ml. For each variation of the volume of these modules were used combinations of substrates: peat 100%; peat 75% + vermiculite 25%; peat 50%

+ vermiculite 50%; peat 25% + vermiculite 75%: peat 25% + vermiculite 25% + vermicompost 50%. For the planting were used hybrid pepper seeds of Bounty F1 of Seminis Company. The experiment was set on randomized block scheme in three repetitions. During the experiment the following properties were evaluated: plant height (cm), root length (cm), stem diameter (mm) and leaf area (cm2). According to the derived results, in the seedling stage of the pepper maturity (age 50 days), the volume of modules and combination of substrates have had significant impact on the development of vegetative parameters. The best combination has proved to be with the following module combinations turf 100% and combination peat 25% + vermiculite 25% + vermicompost 50% and volume 75%.

Keywords: Seedlings, Modules, Substrate, Vermiculite, Vermicompost.

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Under the continental climate conditions, the pepper is cultivated mainly through the prior preparation of the seedlings. The growth of the pepper planted area in protected environments has had a positive effect on the specialization of the greenhouses and the growth of their capacity in producing seedlings. The pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is considered to be a usual vegetable and is used widely for fresh and industrial consumption [5]. Increasing more and more is also the use of modules and alternative substrates in the preparation of seedlings, which has a positive effect on the time and quality of the production. Different substrates are consisted of some materials, which indirectly or directly affect the growth and development of plants [13]. The substrates used on the preparation of the pepper seedlings have a great importance as regards their qualitative and quantitative parameters. The reports that such substrates as peat, perilite, vermicompost and cocopeat or their mixture in different relations have had a significant effect on the height of the plants, the number of their leaves, chlorophyll index

    and the total pepper production [1]; [2]. This is because the quality of the seedling can affect directly the productivity of the pepper. The data brought by [6] identify the fact that pepper seedlings, on the moment ofthe change, must be characterised by the presence of an elastic stem of height 16 20 cm, as well as to have formed 6 10 well-developed leaves. The preparation of the seedlings in modules of styrofoam filled with peat, can affect positively on the growth of the pepper productivity up to 14.2% [6]. In order to have a good development of the seedlings of peppers, the volume of the cells must not be smaller than 85.3 cm3 [4]. The density of seedlings must be between 94 and 125 plants/m2and volume of the cells between 15.6 and 99.2 cm3 [3]. Further studies have concluded that the mixtures with different content of vermicompost can be considered suitable to use as alternative substrates on the preparation of the peppers seedlings, where it is recommended to be used not more than 50% vermicompost [7].This study was conducted to define the effects of the mixture of peat and vermiculite and vermicompost as well as the best volume of the cells of module in the characteristics of the seedlings of the pepper, in the protected environmental conditions.

    Modules with smaller volumes reduce the cost of the production but since the seedlings from modules with smaller volume have small root systems, they affect also the quality of the seedlings [11]. , highlight that substrates from Klasmann respectively Potgrongd-H are characterised with very good structure, content of food with all the needed microelements and very high porosity [12].

  2. MATERIAL AND METHOD

    The experiment was conducted in the seed plot specialized on the preparation of seedlings Nursery of Godanc Godanc, municipality of Shtime, Kosovo. In the experiment, as substrate, it was used the peat "CLASMANN POTGROND- H", mixed with vermiculite of German production and vermicompost. For the planting of the peppers seeds were used styrofoam modules with volume of cells 25 ml, 55ml dhe 75 ml filled with peat, vermiculite and vermicompost as follows: Peat 100% (P 100%); Peat 75% + Vermiculit 25% (P

    75% + V 25%); Peat 50% + Vermiculit 50% (P 50% + V

    50%); Peat 25% + Vermiculit 75% (P 25% + V 75%)

    and Peat 25% + Vermiculit 25% + Vermikompost 50% (P 25% + V 25% + Vc 50%). As plant material, hybrid seeds of the cultivar of the pepper BOUNTY were used, produced by the Seminys company, with germination power 95%. The seeds were planted on the 17 of February 2011 under greenhouse conditions. The average daily temperature during the period of seedlings preparation was 23-26 °C during the day, whereas 15-17°C during the night, while the air humidity was 60-65%. The experiment was raised with three repetitions, according to randomized block scheme with divided variants. The investigated parameters for the age of the seedlings 30, 40 and 50 days old were: height of the seedlings (cm), length of the root (cm), diameter of the stem (mm), and the surface of the leaves (cm2). For the definition of these indicators were used 10 seedlings for each variant. The taken results were analyzed using the analysis of variance according to (ANOVA) with the programme JMP 10.

    Table 1. The effect of the type of substrate and the modules volume in the indicators of the development of peppers seedlings of 30 days of age

  3. RESULTS AND DISCUSION

    In the Table no. 1 are presents data of some morphological parameters for age 30-day seedlings, which corresponds to the stage of formation four true leaves. From these data show that the best indicator associated with seedling height (cm) were achieved in the version of combination T 100%, vol. 25ml While greater leaf area (cm2) the seedlings have formed the variant T 100% vol. 75ml and 55 ml. Mixtures of these options have given higher results compared with variants where peat is found in small percentages.

    From the acquired data which are connected to the indicator of the length of the roots (cm), better results and with significant values are identified in the variant with mixture P 75% + V 25%, vol 25 ml, compared to the indicators of the three other variants (P 50% +V50%, vol.25ml;P 25%

    +V75% vol.25ml; P 25% +V 75% , vol.55ml ). Whereas the stem of the seedlings diameter (mm) acquired the biggest value in the variant P 75% + V 25% , vol 55ml. These data can be explained with the fact that in this phase of growth and development of the seedling, the substrates structure has an important role, where in general the highest percentage of the peat and the lowest percentage of the vermiculite, has greater effect on the development of the seedling.

    Variantes

    Plant height (cm)

    Root length (cm)

    Stem thickness (mm)

    Leaf area (cm²)

    T 100%,

    vol.75ml

    13.32 bc

    9.86 bc

    2.33

    abcd

    25.16

    a*

    vol.55ml

    15.38 ab

    9.96 bc

    2.81 a

    24.24

    a

    vol.25ml

    16.94 a

    9.18 bc

    2.61 ab

    23.16

    ab

    T 75% V25%

    vol.75ml

    11.08

    cde

    10.16 bc

    1.95 d

    14.24

    bcd

    vol.55ml

    11.94

    cde

    11.46

    abc

    2.27 bcd

    14.96

    bcd

    vol.25ml

    11.06

    cde

    14.25 a

    2.35

    abcd

    16.56

    abcd

    T 50% V50%

    vol.75ml

    13.12 bc

    10.96

    abc

    2.37

    abcd

    22.44

    abc

    vol.55ml

    9.53 e

    9.38 bc

    2.04 cd

    9.56 d

    vol.25ml

    13.10 bc

    7.60 c

    2.43

    abcd

    14.40

    bcd

    T 25% V75%

    vol.75ml

    11.10

    cde

    11.13

    abc

    2.07 cd

    10.68

    d

    vol.55ml

    9.94 e

    10.82

    abc

    2.17 bcd

    10.48

    d

    vol.25ml

    11.00cde

    10.84

    abc

    2.21 bcd

    10.64

    d

    T 25% V25% VC50%

    vol.75ml

    11.62

    cde

    11.84ab

    1.97 cd

    14.00

    cd

    vol.55ml

    10.56 d

    10.68abc

    2.46 abc

    13.44

    cd

    vol.25ml

    12.58cd

    11.90 ab

    2.42

    abcd

    17.00

    abcd

    *Numbers having the same alphabetical letters within each column are not different at (0.05) level of significance.

    Variantes

    Plant height (cm)

    Root length (cm)

    Stem thickness (mm)

    Leaf area (cm²)

    T 100%,

    vol.75ml

    13.32 bc

    9.86 bc

    2.33

    abcd

    25.16

    a*

    vol.55ml

    15.38 ab

    9.96 bc

    2.81 a

    24.24

    a

    vol.25ml

    16.94 a

    9.18 bc

    2.61 ab

    23.16

    ab

    T 75% V25%

    vol.75ml

    11.08

    cde

    10.16 bc

    1.95 d

    14.24

    bcd

    vol.55ml

    11.94

    cde

    11.46

    abc

    2.27 bcd

    14.96

    bcd

    vol.25ml

    11.06

    cde

    14.25 a

    2.35

    abcd

    16.56

    abcd

    T 50% V50%

    vol.75ml

    13.12 bc

    10.96

    abc

    2.37

    abcd

    22.44

    abc

    vol.55ml

    9.53 e

    9.38 bc

    2.04 cd

    9.56 d

    vol.25ml

    13.10 bc

    7.60 c

    2.43

    abcd

    14.40

    bcd

    T 25% V75%

    vol.75ml

    11.10

    cde

    11.13

    abc

    2.07 cd

    10.68

    d

    vol.55ml

    9.94 e

    10.82

    abc

    2.17 bcd

    10.48

    d

    vol.25ml

    11.00cde

    10.84

    abc

    2.21 bcd

    10.64

    d

    T 25% V25% VC50%

    vol.75ml

    11.62

    cde

    11.84ab

    1.97 cd

    14.00

    cd

    vol.55ml

    10.56 d

    10.68abc

    2.46 abc

    13.44

    cd

    vol.25ml

    12.58cd

    11.90 ab

    2.42

    abcd

    17.00

    abcd

    *Numbers having the same alphabetical letters within each column are not different at (0.05) level of significance.

    Even the volume of the module has a special importance on this phase of the development of the seedlings, where better results in general are shown in the variants where modules have bigger volume (75ml and55ml). This can be explained with the fact that in this phase of the development of the seedlings, the requests for water and food start increasing.

    With the data shown on table no.2, it can be seen that in the 40 days of age of seedlings (the phase of the formation of the six real leaves), better results are identified in the seedlings of variant P 100%,vol. 75 ml; 55 ml and 25 ml. Also, better results are shown in the variant of the vermicompost mixture. These data are explained with the fact that peat as well as vermicompost has a significant effecton the growth parameters of the development of the seedlings. Also, positive effect has the size of the volume of the modules cells

    Table 2. The effect of substrate and the modules volume in the indicators of the development of the seedlings of 40 days of age

    Variantes

    Plant height (cm)

    R oot length (cm)

    Stem thickness (mm)

    Leaf area (cm²)

    T 100%

    vol.75ml

    15.78

    a

    10.80 a

    2.66 ab

    31.08abc*

    vol.55ml

    15.78

    a

    8.56 bc

    2.71 a

    38.10 a

    vol.25ml

    15.56

    a

    7.60 c

    2.50 abc

    32.16ab

    T 75% V25%

    vol.75ml

    11.10

    cd

    9.20

    abc

    2.28 bcd

    22.02bcde

    vol.55ml

    10.94

    cd

    8.18 bc

    2.29 bcd

    17.52cde

    vol.25ml

    11.62

    bc

    10.00

    ab

    2.10 cd

    20.34bcde

    T 50% V50%

    vol.75ml

    12.32

    bc

    9.64

    abc

    2.39 abc

    20.80bcde

    vol.55ml

    8.78 d

    8.40 bc

    1.91 d

    10.92 e

    vol.25ml

    12.52

    bc

    8.28 bc

    2.22 cd

    23.64bcde

    T 25% V75%

    vol.75ml

    12.44

    bc

    9.80 ab

    2.22 cd

    17.10 de

    vol.55ml

    10.14

    cd

    8.14 bc

    2.14 cd

    16.32 de

    ol.25ml

    11.24

    cd

    8.36 bc

    2.15 cd

    16.74 de

    T 25% V25% Vc50%

    vol.75ml

    11.38

    cd

    10.28

    ab

    2.31

    abcd

    18.12cde

    vol.55ml

    11.08

    cd

    8.94

    abc

    2.15 cd

    17.92cde

    vol.25ml

    14.18

    ab

    8.30 bc

    2.25 cd

    25.14abcd

    *Numbers having the same alphabetical letters within each column are not different at (0.05) level of significance.

    From the data shown on table no.3, for the age of 50-day-old seedlings respectively the phase eight of the real leaves it can be concluded that for the seedlings height indicators (cm) and stems diameter (mm) variant P 100%, vol. 25ml has resulted more successful. For the indicator of the leaves surface (cm2), better results has had the variant P 100%, vol. 55ml, compared to other variants. Whereas for the parametre of the roots length (cm) better results have been seen with the variant P 100%, vol. 75 ml. For all the analyzed parameters of the study it is evidenced the fact that better indicators, except the variants with peat, are acquired even in the variants of the mixture of peat vermiculite vermicompost (P25% V25% Vc50%). This explained with the fact that in this phase of the development of the seedlings, they have greater requests not only for the feeding elements which are secured from vermicomposto but also for a bigger volume for a better development of the roots system. The 50-day-old seedlings have given larger results in these parameters: plants height (cm), fresh weight of the root, fresh weight of the leaves etc[8]. The ideal time of the changing of the peppers seedlings on the field is 6-8 weeks [9]. The ideal peppers age is 8 weeks after the germination of the seed giving better and more qualitative product whereas they do not prefer the age older than 10 weeks [10]; [11].

    Table 3. The effect of substrate and the modules volume in the indicators of the development of the seedlings of age 50 days old

    Variantes

    Plant height (cm)

    Root length (cm)

    Stem thickn ess (mm)

    Leaf area (cm²)

    T 100%

    vol.75ml

    15.26

    abc

    10.42 a

    2.51

    ab

    41.04abc*

    vol.55ml

    16.12 ab

    8.80 abc

    2.59

    ab

    44.40 a

    vol.25ml

    18.10 a

    8.54 abc

    2.62 a

    42.00ab

    T 75% V25%

    vol.75ml

    11.16 de

    9.08 abc

    2.34

    ab

    32.56abcd e

    vol.55ml

    12.88

    bcde

    7.78 c

    2.41

    ab

    29.92abcd e

    vol.25ml

    12.76

    bcd

    8.08 abc

    2.35

    ab

    33.36abcd e

    T50% V50%

    vol.75ml

    13.74

    bcd

    10.26 ab

    2.55

    ab

    35.68abcd

    vol.55ml

    9.74 e

    8.04 bc

    2.10 b

    18.32 e

    vol.25ml

    13.84

    bcd

    8.06 abc

    2.28

    ab

    27.76bcde

    T25% V75%

    vol.75ml

    11.72

    cde

    10.04

    abc

    2.32

    ab

    24.08cde

    vol.55ml

    11.16 de

    9.34 abc

    2.45

    ab

    23.20 de

    vol.25ml

    11.68

    cde

    8.64 abc

    2.17

    ab

    26.00cde

    T25% V25% Vc50%

    vol.75ml

    14.84

    bcde

    10.34

    abc

    2.52

    ab

    39.60abcd e

    vol.55ml

    15.46 de

    8.86 abc

    2.62

    ab

    33.92cde

    vol.25ml

    16.57 ab

    8.12 abc

    2.63

    ab

    33.44abcd e

    *Numbers having the same alphabetical letters within each column are not different at (0.05) level of significance.

  4. CONCLUSIONS

    • Seedlings prepared in substrates containing only industrial peat had better morphological parameters, in all the phases of their development

    • Morphological characteristics of the peppers seedlings such as their height, roots length, stems diameter, leafs surface were characterized by smaller numerical values, by growing the percentage of the vermiculite in substrate and decreasing peat.

    • Positive effect on the improvement of morphological characteristics of the peppers seedlings has had the usage of the combination of the substrate, peat 25%, vermculite 25% dhe vermicompost 50%.

    • Among all the analyzed variants for the study, on the modules with cells volume 75ml, peppers seedlings have displayed better performances of the morphological parameters analyzed above.

  5. REFERENCES

  1. M. Albaho, N. Bhat, H. Abo and B.Tomas, Effect of three substrates on growth and yield of two cultivars of capsicum annum, Europ. J. Scient. Res., 2009, vol. 28, pp. 233-227.

  2. M.Albaho, N. Bhat, H. Abo and B. Tomas, Effect of three different substrates on growth and yield of two cultivars of Capsicum annum. Eur. J. of Sci. Res., 2009, 28(2): 227-233.

  3. D. Romano, A. Paratore and A.L. Rosi, Plant density and container cell volume on solanaceous seedling growth, ISHS Acta Horticulturae 614, 2013.

  4. J. De Grazia, P.A. Tittonell and A. Chiesa, Growth and quality of sweet pepper (Capsicum annum L.) transplants as affected by substrate properties and irrigation frequency. Advances in Horticultural Sciences 2004, 18:181-187.

  5. A.L. Khan and Z.K. Shinwar, Role of endo phytechaetomium globosum lk4 in growth of Capsicum annum by production of gibberellins and idols acetic acid. Pak. J. Bot., 2012, 44(5): 1601-1607.

  6. V. Marcovic and M. DjuroVca, The effect of seedling quality on tomato yield, plant and fruit characteristics. ISHS Acta Horticulture, 2000, 5(Placeholder1)33.

  7. M. Pascual, M.A. Ruiz and R. Melgar, Empleo de vermicompost de restos hortícolas como sustrato alternativo en semilleros de plantas aromáticas. VIII Jornadas de Sustratos, Grupo de Sustratos de la SECH, 2006, 9-11 octubre.

  8. M. Naz, A. Anjum and I. Ahmad, Growth of Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) F1 hybride Sky line-2 in response to different ages of transplants. Journal of research (Science), Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan, Vol.17, No.2, April 2006, pp. 91-95.ISSN 1021-1012.

  9. Ch.S. Vavrina, Transplant Age in Vegetable Crops, Horttechnology, October-December,1998 8(4).

  10. H.M. Ibrahim, F.O. Olasantan, and R.O. Oyewale, Age of seedling at transplanting influenced growth and fruit yield of sweet pepper (Capsicum annum L. Cv . Rodo). Net Journal of Agriculltural Science Vol.1(4),pp. 107-110, October 2013 ISSN:2315-9766 Full Length Research Paper.

  11. W.L. Schrader, Using Transplants in Vegetable Production University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu, 2000, ISBN 978-1- 60107-193-4.

  12. N. Paradikovic, Z. Kraljicak, Zasticeni prostori plastenici i staklenici, Poljoprivredni Fakultet, 2008, Osijek.

  13. F.Gungor,E.Yildirim, Effect of different growing media on quality,growth and yield of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) under greenhouse conditions ,Pak.J.Bot.,45(5): 1605- 1608,2013.

Leave a Reply