Optimal Placement of Distributed Generator in Distribution System using Fuzzy Composition

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV6IS070163

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Optimal Placement of Distributed Generator in Distribution System using Fuzzy Composition

Gursharanjit Singh Gill Student (Electrical Engg), Deptt. of Electrical Engineering

Bhutta College of Engineering And Technology, Ludhiana

Ludhiana, Punjab

Jagroop kaur

Student (Electrical Engg), Deptt. of Electrical Engineering Guru Nanak Dev Engineering College

Ludhiana, Punjab

Abstract – This paper presents a simple and effective methodology for optimal placement of distributed generator (DG) in distribution system. Three criteria viz. improvement in minimum voltage, reduction in difference between maximum and minimum voltage levels and loss reduction have been selected for optimal placement of DG in distribution system. Backward forward sweep method has been used to carry out base power flow analysis. Fuzzy max-min and max-product compositions have been used for obtaining maximum satisfaction level based on the above said criteria. The proposed methodology has been simulated on 11-bus and IEEE 33-bus distribution systems in the MATLAB environment. The results obtained clearly show the effectiveness of the proposed methodology.)

Keywords Forward Backward Sweep Method, Max-Min Approach, Max-Product Approach, Fuzzy Composition, DG Placement.

I.INTRODUCTION

In present age, Distributed Generator is not a new concept. The small scale generation is the main idea behind the DG. It can be easily placed closer to the point of consumption in the power system. DG is, by definition, small size generators, which can come from some traditional technologies. It may come from variety of technologies and sources. DGs from renewable energy sources, like wind, solar and biomass are often called as Green energy distribution feeder with concentrated load. Some of the main benefits of DGs can be named as power generation cost reduction, power losses reduction, voltage deviation improvement, power quality enhancement, the possibility of producing both electrical and thermal energy in the form of combined heat and power (CHP), reducing Total Harmonic Distortion (THD), increasing the efficiency, positive effect on the environment, etc. Based upon three main categories namely, economical, technical and environmental advantages, DG offer a number of benefits. It covers fuel, transmission and distribution cost in economical advantages and on the other hand environmental advantages include low emission and noise. There is wide variety of issues in technical advantages such as good voltage profile, reduce system loss, improved reliability and relaxed thermal constraints. The main reason of using DG units in power system is its numerous benefits that are reduced line losses, Voltage profile improvement, Reduced emissions of pollutants, Increased overall energy efficiency, reliability and security, Improved power quality, Relieved T&D

congestion, Deferred investments for upgrades of facilities, Reduced O&M costs of some DG technologies, Reduced fuel costs due to increased overall efficiency, Reduced reserve requirements and the associated costs, Lower operating costs due to peak shaving, Increased security for critical loads. The planning of distribution system with the presence of DG requires definition several factors, like: the best technology to be used, the best location, the network connection way etc. For the impact of DG in distribution system, operating characteristics, such as electric losses, voltage profile, reliability needs to be appropriately evaluated. For the electrical engineers the optimum planning of power distribution system network is one of the most important research fields. Due to the great length and close proximity of networks to the ultimate consumer increase the capital investment and cost because of their losses. The problem of DG allocation is of great importance. The installation of DG at non-optimal places can result into increased system losses and costs, therefore, having an effect opposite to the desired. Fuzzy set theory provides way to comprehend this problem and also allow to integrate on own intuition, intelligence and knowledge acquire from past experience in solving this. A fuzzy set is a set containing elements that have varying degrees of membership in the set. All information contained in a fuzzy set is described by its membership function.

The nature of uncertainty in a problem is a very important point that engineers should ponder prior to their selection of an appropriate method to express the uncertainty [1]. Here fuzzy set provide a mathematical way to represent inaccuracy and vagueness in humanistic system. There are many papers published in the literature that present algorithms for distribution planning implementing DG. Several approaches to solve the DG placement in distribution system have been proposed in references [2, 3] DG placement problems are analyzed to improve the reliability, voltage profile, reduced power loss with considering different demand on load point. In reference [4] the proposed index regards the impact of a distributed generation operation strategy on generation cost and reliability of the network. Ref.

  1. Bacteria Foraging Algorithm (BFA) and Binary Genetic Algorithm (BGA) are used to investigate the DG placement with the purpose of power loss and voltage deviation reduction. Reference [6] was studied the effect of DG penetration in network on power loss reduction at different loads.

    The aim in this paper is to improve the voltage profile, reduced loss and to minimize the change in voltage, in this way operation and investment cost can also reduce also maximum potential benefit can be achieved.

    1. PROBLEM FORMULATION

      The ultimate aim of this paper is to reduce the power loss and to improve voltage profile with the optimal placement of DG. In other words DG should be located at that bus which leads to maximize reduction in system losses and improve the voltage profile also to reduce the change in voltage. Hence the problem of placement of DG is directly related with determining of system losses and voltage profile at each bus. To achieve this, first step is to carry out load flow analysis. For this backward-forward sweep method has been used to carry out base power flow analysis. The backward forward sweep method is a competent method and it is used for solving load flow equations due to its solution accuracies. This method can be applied for both mesh and radial distribution systems. In backward sweep Kirchhoffs current law is used to find the current in each branch by assuming the value of voltages and in the forward sweep, the voltage at each bus is updated by complex component of calculated bus voltage [6].

      Calculation of load current at different buses:-

      The load currents drawn at different buses are given by:

      Where,

      = power loss in ith section

      = power loss in whole system

      = resistance of ith section.

    2. FUZZY COMPOSITION

      Fuzzy relation in different product space can be combined with each other by the operation called Composition. There are many composition methods in use, e.g. max-product method, max-average method and max-min method. But max- min and max-product composition method is best known in fuzzy logic applications. In this proposed methodology two common forms of composition are used: one is called the max- min composition and other the max-product composition.

      1. Max-min composition

        Suppose R is a fuzzy relation on the Cartesian space X×Y, S is a fuzzy relation on Y×Z, Q is a fuzzy relation on Z×X and T is fuzzy relation on X×Y×Z , then fuzzy max-min composition is define i terms of the set-theoretic notation and membership function theoretic- notation.

        T = RSQ

        (6)

        Where i = 1, 2, 3..n n= number of buses

        = current drawn at ith bus

        = complex power drawn at ith bus

        = complex voltage at ith bus

        (1)

      2. Max-product composition

      Fuzzy max-product composition is defined in terms of the membership function-theoretic notation as:

      (7)

      In the backward sweep section current of the system can be determined as:

      (2)

      Where,

      i = 1, 2, 3..n-1

      = current in ith section

      = current in nth section

      In forward sweep bus voltage of the system can be determined as:

    3. TEST AND RESULTS

The Fig. 3 shows an 11 bus system in which 0.5 MW load is uniformly distributed along the length of the line. DG of

5.5 MW is used for this problem analysis. The input data of bus loadings and line parameters corresponding to 11 bus distribution system has been given in reference [7].

Where

, i = 2n

= admittance of i-1th section.

Power loss in various sections can be determined as:

(3)

(4)

(5)

Fig.3 -11 bus distribution system [7]

Table I shows the load flow analysis. These results are obtained with the help of Backward-Forward sweep method, further max-min and max-product composition is applied to this analysis for the optimal placement of DG.

TABLE I.

Series no.

DG

placement

System

power loss(KW)

Minimum voltage(KV)

Vmax- Vmin(KV)

1

Without DG

33.6552

12.3804

0.1196

2

DG at bus no.1

33.6552

12.3804

0.1196

3

DG at bus no.2

24.9134

12.4042

0.0957

4

DG at bus no.3

18.1321

12.4282

0.0717

5

DG at bus no.4

13.2987

12.422

0.0779

6

DG at bus no.5

10.3979

12.4759

0.024

7

DG at bus no.6

9.4116

12.4996

0.0004

8

DG at bus no.7

10.3196

12.5

0.0021

9

DG at bus no.8

13.0992

12.5

0.0021

10

DG at bus no.9

17.7260

12.5

0.0021

11

DG at bus no.10

24.1733

12.5

0.0020

12

DG at bus no.11

32.4130

12.5

0.0019

Table 2 shows the results of max-min and max-product composition. It is clear from the table 2, that the optimal placement for installation of DG is bus number 6. At bus number 6 the power loss is minimum, voltage profile is good. The change in voltage is also minimum at this bus. Results of bus 6 are given in table 3 and Fig. 4, 5, and 6 shows the graphical representation of the results

TABLE II.

Bus no.

Max-product

composition

Max-min composition)

1

0

0

2

0.0144

0.1955

3

0.1005

0.392

4

0.1148

0.3418

5

0.6014

0.7847

6

0.9756

0.979

7

0.9625

0.9454

8

0.0846

0.8313

9

0.6558

0.6443

10

0.3904

0.3838

11

0.0511

0.00013

TABLE III.

Fig 4 Power losses with DG at each buss

Fig 5Voltage profile at each bus with DG

Fig 6 Change in voltage at each bus with DG

The Fig. 7 shows the IEEE 33 bus system, this type of system is usually called a lateral type distribution system. The parameters of the Fig. 7 are given in the refrence [11].

Optimal bus no.

Total Power loss(KW)

Minimum voltage(KV)

Change in voltage(KV)

6

Without

DG

With

DG

12.4996

0.0004

33.6552

9.4116

Fig.7 33 bus system [11]

Table 4 shows the load flow analysis of 33 bus system, which is carried out by backward-forward sweep method.

TABLE IV.

TABLE V.

Bus number

Max-min

Max-product

1

0

0

2

.0425

.0015

3

.2632

.0659

4

.4314

.1765

5

.5923

.3468

6

.9414

.8978

7

.9855

.9855

8

.9176

.9023

9

.8025

.7630

10

.6869

.6287

11

.6647

.6084

12

.6216

.5689

13

.4547

.3913

14

.3943

.3224

15

.3241

.2441

16

.2358

.1836

17

.0885

.0636

18

0

0

19

.0402

.00136

20

.0511

.0015

21

.0383

.0007

22

.0383

.0005

23

.2614

.0619

24

.2577

.0539

25

.2522

.0435

26

.9396

.8765

27

.9360

.8441

28

.8474

.7229

29

.7685

.6374

30

.714

.5685

31

.5932

.4587

32

.5522

.419

33

.5016

.3703

Table 5 shows the results of max-min and max-product compositions. It is clear from the table 5 that the optimal place for installation of DG is bus number 7. System power loss and voltage profile of bus number 7 is given in the table 6. The graphical representation of these results are shown in fig. 8,9 and10.

td>

DG

Placemeno.

Series no.

System Power loss

(p.u.)

Vmin (p.u.)

Vmax- Vmin(p.u.)

1

Without DG

0.1264

.91564

0.0846

2

bus 1

0.1264

.9154

0.0846

3

bus 2

0.1174

.9177

0.0823

4

bus 3

0.0828

.9298

0.0702

5

bus 4

0.0747

.9387

0.0613

6

bus 5

0.0688

.9478

0.0522

7

bus 6

0.0595

.9669

0.0330

8

bus 7

0.0651

.9701

0.0299

9

bus 8

0.0914

.9693

0.0307

10

bus 9

0.1360

.9684

0.0316

11

bus 10

0.1808

.9674

0.0326

12

bus 11

0.1894

.9673

0.0325

13

bus 12

0.2061

.9670

0.0322

14

bus 13

0.2708

.9655

0.0345

15

bus 14

0.2942

.9643

0.0352

16

bus 15

0.3214

.9641

0.0359

17

bus 16

0.3556

.9634

0.0366

18

bus 17

0.4127

.9615

0.0385

19

bus 18

0.447

.9608

0.0392

20

bus 19

0.1283

.9176

0.0824

21

bus 20

0.2243

.9182

0.0818

22

bus 21

0.2500

.9175

0.0825

23

bus 22

0.2952

.9175

0.0825

24

bus 23

0.0999

.9297

0.0703

25

bus 24

0.1360

.9295

0.0705

26

bus 25

0.1853

.9292

0.0708

27

bus 26

0.0672

.9668

0.0332

28

bus 27

0.0784

.9666

0.0334

29

bus 28

0.1186

.9656

0.0344

30

bus 29

0.1492

.9649

0.0351

31

bus 30

0.1701

.9644

0.0366

32

bus 31

0.2171

.9632

0.0368

33

bus 32

0.2330

.9628

0.0372

34

bus 33

0.2526

.9621

0.0379

TABLE VI.

Optimal bus no.

Total Power loss(p.u.)

Minimum voltage(p.u.)

Change in voltage(p.u.)

7

Without

DG

With

DG

0.9669

0.0330

0.1294

0.0595

Fig. 8 system power loss at each bus with DG

Fig. 9 voltage profile at each bus with DG

Fig. 10 change in voltage at each bus with DG

CONCLUSION

In this paper, an effective methodology for the optimal location for placement of DG in radial distribution system has been presented. In the presented methodology, the optimal location of DG has been decided based on the criterion of fuzzy composition. The backward-forward sweep method has been used to solve the load flow analysis. The numerical example confirms the validity of the proposed method. The proposed methodology for finding optimal location of DG has been implemented and tested on 11 bus system and 33 bus system. It conclude that in 11 bus system with uniform distribution of load, the system power loss before adding DG was 33.6552 kW, which has been reduced to 9.4116 kW and voltage profile increase to 12.4759 KV after adding DG at optimal location. In 33 bus system system power loss before adding DG was 0.1264 (p.u.), which have been reduced to 0.0595 (p.u.) and voltage profile increase to 0.9669 (p.u.) after the addition of DG at optimal place.

REFERENCES

  1. H. Shayeghi, B. Mohamadi, Multi-Objective Fuzzy Model in Optimal Siting and Sizing of DG for Loss Reduction, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems Engineering 2:3 2009

  2. Carmen L.T. Borges, Djalma M. Falcao, Optimal distributed generation allocation for reliability, losses, and voltage improvement, Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 28, No. 6, 2006, pp. 413- 420.

  3. G. Celli, F. Pilo, Optimal distribution generation allocation in MV distribution networks, Proc. Of the 22nd IEEE International Conference on Power Industry Computer Applications, Power Engineering Society, 2001, pp. 81-86.

  4. Mahdi Raoofat a & Ahmad Reza Malekpour,OptimalAllocation of Distributed Generations and Remote Controllable Switches to Improve the Network Performance Considering Operation Strategy of Distributed Generations, Electric Power Components and Systems, 39:18091827, 2011

  5. S.A.Hashemi Zadep, O.Zeidabadi Nejad2, Optimal DG Placement for Power Loss Reduction and Improvement Voltage Profile Using Smart Methods, International Journal of Smart Electrical Engineering, Vol.1, No.3, Fall 2012.

  6. G.W. Chang, S. Y. Chu and H. L. Wang, (May, 2007), An Improved Backward/Forward Sweep Load Flow Algorithm for Radial Distribution Systems, IEEE Transactions on power systems, Vol. 22.

  7. C. Wang and M. H. Nehrir, (November, 2004), Analytical approaches for optimal placement of Distributed Generation sources in power systems, IEEE Transactions. PowerSyst. 19 , pp. 20682076.

  8. K.-H. Kim, Y.-J. Lee, S.-B. Rhee, S.-K. Lee and S.-K. You, (July 2002

    ), Dispersed generator placement using fuzzy-GA in distribution systems, in Proc. 2002 IEEE Power Engineering Soc. Summer Meeting, Vol. 3, Chicago, IL, pp. 11481153.

    P.P. Barker, (June/July, 2000), Determining the impact of Distributed Generation on power systems: Part 1radial distribution systems, in: Proceedings of IEEE Power engineering Society Summer Meeting, 2000, pp. 16451656.

  9. W. Kellogg, M. H. Nehrir, G. Venkataramanan, and V. Gerez, (March, 1998). Generation unit sizing and cost analysis for stand-alone wind, photovoltaic, and hybrid wind/PV systems, IEEE Trans. Energy Conversion, Vol. 13, pp. 7075.

  10. J. Sajad, (May,2013),IEEE 33- bus distribution system,

    www.scribd.com/doc/143306826/IEEE-33-Bus-Test-Distribution-

    System

  11. K.-H. Kim, Y.-J. Lee, S.-B. Rhee, S.-K. Le and S.-K. You, (July 2002

    ), Dispersed generator placement using fuzzy-GA in distribution systems, in Proc. 2002 IEEE Power Engineering Soc. Summer Meeting, Vol. 3, Chicago, IL, , pp. 11481153.

  12. N. Mithulananthan, L.P., Than O, (September, 2004), Distributed generator placement technique in power distribution system using genetic algorithm to reduce losses,Thammasat Int. J. Sci. Tech, pp. 5662.

  13. R. Yokoyama, S. H. Bae, T. Morita, and H. Sasaki, (February, 1988). Multiobjectiveoptimal generation dispatch based on probability security criteria, IEEE Trans. Power Syst., Vol. 3, pp. 317324.

Leave a Reply