Urea Stripper Tube Leakage

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV7IS030090

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Urea Stripper Tube Leakage

Prem Baboo

Sr. Manager (Prod) National Fertilizers Ltd. India

Sr. advisor for www.ureaknowhow.com

Abstract – This article entails the chronic problem of Fertilizer Industry regarding leakage in Urea Stripper. A critical leak incident that occurred in one of the most critical piece of equipment (stripper) in Urea plant resulted to emergency shutdown and losses in production and how the situation can be analyzed to prevent re- occurrence of similar incidents in chemical Industry.On dated 19/01/2018 at 05.30 hrs. Suddenly 31 stream urea stripper got heavy leakage and carbamate came out through pressure safety valve in shell side of heat exchanger (stripper). A rupture in old plug of the tube of a high pressure caused leakage of high pressure urea solution and ammonium carbamate to the atmosphere which results to emergency shutdown and losses in production for three days. Leakage was so big that Shell became pressurized up to PSV setting value i.e. 26.0 bar. Immediately shut down was taken to control the situation. The intent of this article is to highlight the issues faced in identification of Urea Stripper leakage during plant operation and rectification of the problems.

INTRODUCTION

The National Fertilizers Ltd. Vijaipur have two ammonia plant M/S. Haldor Topsoe Technology, Denmark capacity 1750 & 1864 TPD for Line-I & line-II respectively and four urea plant of M/S. Saipem ammonia stripping process, Italy. The Line-I plant installed in 1988 and that of line II in 1997. Urea-II plant was commissioned in 1st quarter of year 1997 and commercial production was declared on 31.03.1997. The capacity of Urea-I urea II is 3030 & 3231 TPD respectively. The raw material used includes natural gas, water and power. Three Numbers Captive power plant of capacity 17 X 3 MW are used in this complex. The two no of bimetallic strippers were supplied by M/S FBM, Hudson, Italy which are in use since the inception of the plant. The maintenance history of these stripper shows that leakages occurred at different point of time which forced unexpected plant shutdowns and interruption of urea production.

Detail of Stripper

Urea Stripper is considered as the backbone of Urea Plant performance and efficiency. Its performance determines production and profitability of end product which is Urea Fertilizer.

Reaction products leaving the reactor are sent into bimetallic stripper tubes sides for carbamate decomposition. The

medium pressure steam (23 bar) is used for this purpose. The stripper is the high pressure vessel of H.P loop. Operating at 147 bar in tube side pressure and that of shell side is 24 bar. The top temperature of stripper is 190 0C and that of bottom is 2050C.at this temperature approximate 80

% of carbamate presents in solution is decomposed and rest are decomposed in MP & LP section. The water is separated in pre-concentrator and two stages of vacuum evaporation sections. The decomposition reaction is a reverse reaction of urea formation.

NH4COONH2=NH3 +CO2- HEAT

As can be inferred from the equation, decomposition is promoted by reducing pressure and /or adding heat. In M/S. Saipem process decomposition is carried out in three steps. Decomposition is promoted by heating and stripping CO2 by vaporized excess ammonia, according to Henrys Law of partial pressure under the same pressure level as urea reactor. The plant commissioned in 1997 till date stripper is running. During pre-commissioning 55 no of tubes plugged in presence of Saipem representative. Tubes were plugged as Zirconium lining of these tubes was found damaged. In present shut down one damaged old plug replaced with new one and others eight numbers minor leakages also attended by applying plug and welding done. Leakage. Stripper used is falling film type heat exchanger decomposed and vaporized gases and liquid effluent are therefore in counter current contact and CO2 concentration in liquid is gradually reduced from top to bottom of the stripper tubes. Besides the above, general corrosion has been observed on the bottom tube sheet, tube to tube sheet welding and bottom part of tubes (20 mm). Stripper has rendered service for around 21 years. Two types of stripping process are there; Viz: CO2 stripping and NH3 stripping. Both process work according to shift in partial pressure. This process is the most modern and energy efficient and therefore, widely used now a day. Decomposition at high pressure requires higher temperature, which means that much biuret has formed and the liquid becomes corrosive, but in the M/S. Saipem process the excess of ammonia and the use of Zirconium in the stripper permits minimizing these problems. The off gases generated in stripper are condensed in the high

Pressure carbamate condenser where low pressure steam is generated. The NH3 to CO2 mole ratio of 3.5:1 is used and the reactor is operated at a pressure by which the carbamate solution is pumped to the reactor by ejector but not using Carbamate pumps.

For passivation of bottom parts of stripper, a passivation compressor also installed to give air in bottom dome. About 42 Nm3/hr air is feed to stripper bottom.CO2 fed to Reactor normally contains a small percentage of H2, CH4 & CO in addition to inerts like N2 & Ar. The passivation air also

Fig-1

given to CO2 in 1st stage suction of CO2 compressor. We maintained 0.35 to 0.4% O2 in 3rd suction of CO2 compressor. Together with O2 contained in passivation air could give rise to explosiveness problem when sent to CPP for HRU fuel to avoid explosive mixture natural gas also fed to MP condenser so that explosive mixture in inerts gas could not be made. Passivation air presents a major issue for urea process. Designed to prevent the corrosion of stainless steel, passivation air constantly coats the inner surface of stripper tubes with an oxygenated process solution.

Fig-2

Sr. No.

Parameters

Tube side

Shell side

1

Pressure design

165 bar

26 bar

2

Pressure working

147

23 bar

3

Temperature, In /Out

190/205 0C

220/220 0C

4

Fluid

Urea Solution

Steam

5

MOC

Bimetallic outer-26/22/2, Inner – Zirconium

SA 516 GR 60

6

PSV set value

165 bar

26 bar

7

No. of pass

1

1

8

No of tube

1677

9

Heat transfer area

632.21 m2

9

Tube length

6000 mm

10

Tube ID

20 mm

11

Tube OD

22.7 mm

12

Heat Duty

19.19 X 106 k.cal/hr.

13

Pitch

25 mm triangular

Table-1

An ammonia rich gas (CO2 lean gas) rises from lower parts of the tube, then the gas at the upper parts of the tube becomes an ammonia richer gas as compared with equilibrium composition and the decomposition reaction in liqud phase correct the deviation from the equilibrium (the stripping effect). Carbamate is decomposed at reactor pressure with the help of one of the reactants. First thing that comes into mind while going to look for leakage in such high pressure vessel is that, what are the potential points that can lead to leakage in such thick metal walls. There are three surfaces in contact with highly corrosive Carbamate solution.

  1. Tube sheet.

  2. Tube itself.

  3. Tube to tube sheet joint.

The tube sheet thickness is 255 mm including 10 mm overlay as shown in the figure-2. The leakage develops when overlay eaten with corrosion/erosion, less passivation. The condensate outlet of stripper collects to steam condensate drum. The rest energy of this steam condensate

Fig-3

uses in MP decomposer. In this line conductivity meter also installed for quick indication of leakage ranging 0-500 µ mho. Also if there is any leakage in Stripper tubes or tube sheet, it shall be picked up in steam condensate leaving Stripper shell side. This will appear in the form of high conductivity. Monitoring of fresh steam entering into steam drum and condensate leaving the steam drum is very important and its delta (increase in conductivity of condensate leaving steam drum with respect to incoming steam) will determine the extent of leakage.

REASON OF LEAKAGE

The main reason of plug failure is old age of equipment i.e. 21 years old vessel. The old 55 numbers tube plugs failure one by one due to layers of welding gradually deteriorated. Corrosion and exposure of hidden defect in tube-to-tube sheet joint. Lack of passivation air. Leakage was so heavy that steam to stripper turned to zero immediately and stripper shell immediately pressurized up to PSV set value

    1. 26 bar, as shown in the figure-4

      Job hand over

      After plant stopped the job handed over to mechanical maintenance after 24 hrs. for top & bottom manhole cover opening. The all activities plant shut down to plant start-up listed below-

      31 Stream Shut Down Timing

      Sr. No.

      Activities

      From

      To

      Total hrs

      Date

      Parallel Activities

      Hrs

      Hrs

      19-01-2018

      1

      Feed Cut

      5.30

      Hrs

      2

      H.P. Loop Draining

      5.45

      11.0

      6.15

      19-01-

      2018

      Alternate Nut/Bolt Opening by Mech. Maint, Nucleonic Opening

      3

      LS Purging

      11.0

      13.0

      4.00

      19/01/2018,20/01/2018

      4

      H.W Filling

      13.0

      17.0

      4.00

      31 Stream Steam Isolated

      5

      HW Overflowing

      17.0

      21.0

      4.00

      Blind to be provided in V-29 & E- 1 Inlet line.

      6

      Draining only stripper

      21.0

      22.0

      1.00

      Reactor/E-5 Draining

      7

      H/o To Mech Maint for Top/Bottom man Hole cover opening

      22.0

      4.00

      6

      8

      Cooling By Air/DM water

      4.00

      10.0

      6.00

      MP loop draining

      9

      Sample analysis for O2/Ammonia

      10.00

      10.15

      0.25

      31 LT 101 job

      10

      Man entry for top/Bottom internal opening

      10.15

      16.00

      6.00

      20-01-2018

      11

      Leakage detection

      16.00

      17.00

      1.00

      Others job

      12

      Job by Mech Maint for leakage/welding

      17.00

      0.00

      7.00

      21-01-2018

      13

      Leakage checked after Job Over

      0.00

      1.00

      1.00

      14

      DP test

      1.00

      3.00

      2.00

      15

      Stripper internal boxed up

      3.00

      9.00

      6.00

      Blinds removed

      16

      Manhole cover boxed up

      9.00

      15.00

      6.00

      Steam Charging

      17

      L.S Heating

      15.00

      19.00

      4.00

      18

      K.W. Heating

      19.00

      22.45

      3.75

      CO2 Compressor running

      19

      Ammoniation

      22.45

      3.00

      4.00

      22-01-2018

      20

      Feed In

      3.00

      Total hrs

      72.15

      Table-2

      Fig-4

      Detection of the leakage

      Arrangement as shown in the figure- 7 was done for getting tube leakage detection. Blind are provided to following equipment lines.

      1. Steam to shell side inlet line

      2. Outlet line i.e. V-29 vessel

The Shell side pressurized with instrument air at the pressure 7.0 bar and leakage detects with soap solution in top & bottom dome(Channel). Air & soap solution test is the most effective and safe for detection of leakage. Although it is the time consuming test and finding the defects but increasing the inspectors during the test serves the purpose. The test was carried out by pressurizing the shell side with

air at 6.5-7.0 bar. After pressurization, inspectors can readily enter into both the channel sides with soap solution and can start finding the leaking points. It requires much of attention and skill of inspector to look for all the defects. Full scanning is must and a cumbersome job. The salient features of this test are:

  1. Reliable and effective but time consuming.

  2. Good for all small and large leakages.

  3. Safe and less risky than ammonia leak test.

After the confirmation of leakage in both the channel its the responsibility of Inspection and welding by expert welder to arrest the leakage in Urea Stripper. Major culprit plug leakage detects easily without applying soap solution air was coming from the damaged plug. For further minor leakage detection, a team was deputed for top & bottom channel. Following minor leakages were also detected as shown in the figure-8.

Fig-5

Old plug removing is very risky

When old plug removing the tubes filled with ammonium carbamate & urea solution. So the B.A set and protection apparatus are used to remove the old plugs. Preparation and Installation work can be done by experts of fitting & welding persons. In case of a leak one can easily check if there is any damage of tube sheet as corrosion would start from the inside the tube sheet hole. Replacing a new plug with 2 RE-69(25/22/2) takes max 15 minutes and can be done with a protection mask when ammonia is present.

Rectification of defects

The rectification of defects was carried out very carefully as it involves welding adjacent to the healthy tubes and tube- to-tube sheet joints. Following guidelines as follow listed below:

  1. Grinding was done effectively in order to flush the pin hole completely. Ineffective grinding would never rectify the leaking point.

  2. Welding was made after dye-penetrate testing of ground off area.

  3. TIG welding with lower heat input was used for rectification.

  4. Adjacent tubes and tube sheet weld joints avoided. Certain jigs used for the same in order to concentrate the welding heat where required.

  5. Qualification of welder was made before welding in this sensitive area. High heat input will cause burn thru / HAZ area which would eventually be a potential point of leakage.

Fig- 6

The 2 RE 69 (25/22/2) material plugs were applied on defected tubes. Each and every time leakage was detected with DPT and air/soap solution.

Fig-7

  1. Replaced three old plugs at top channel.

  2. Two number in bottom channel.

  3. Two number new tubes plug at top & bottom.

Fig-8

CONCLUSION

When stripper problems occur, they take at least 3- 4 days to fix the problems. The large nature of strippers means spare parts are not available onsite and could take weeks to be installed. Even minor leaks mean shutting down the stripper, cooling it, washing out its interior and starting it back up. Just shut-down and start-up procedures could take days. The result is often money of lost revenue. If a stripper experiences accelerated corrosion that causes the wall thickness to fall below required safety margins, the result could be dangerous. The observation and inspection results indicate that active corrosion in the top part of tubes however the passivation air is sufficient in top part of the channel. Physical condition of replaced original plugs indicates severe erosion/Corrosion. Difficult weld position risk for damaging surrounding tube ends very high risk for porosities & worm holes due to moisture, to avoid moisture coming down during welding at bottom tube sheet an ejector

system was installed in shell side to remove moisture. Repeated heat input a leaking plug weld is the main cause for an unexpected plant shut down when looking at HP heat exchanger failure modes replacing a welded plug requires minimum 11 hours. Omega Bond Tubing is the next generation solution; it is the only technology that combines the benefits of zirconium and titanium, ideally optimizing urea processing. In omega bond no need of passivation air.

LEGENDS

TPD-ton per day, H.P-high Pressure, M.P. medium pressure, MW-megawatt. MOC- material of construction, 2-RE-69- (25/22/2-Chromium. Nickel & molybdenum), L.S-low pressure steam(4bar), H.W. High pressure water (35 bar), K.W.-very high pressure water (160 Bar), B.A. set-breathing apparatus set.

Leave a Reply