Variation in Liquid Limit of Calcium Bentonite Amended with Activated Carbon in GCL

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV5IS08032

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Variation in Liquid Limit of Calcium Bentonite Amended with Activated Carbon in GCL

Salha Fathima A

Department of Civil Engineering Marian Engineering College Trivandrum, India

Abstract Geosynthetic Clay Liners (GCL) are extensively used to replace clay liners in the waste containments. GCL is made by stitching two layers of geotextile with bentonite as hydraulic barrier between the geotextiles. Many researchers have reported on the diffusion characteristics of metal ions through GCL. Addition or partial replacement of Bentonite in GCL, with materials such as Activated carbon, Flyash, Silicafume, Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) make the GCL more economical. These materials are abundantly available, very fine and their use in GCL is an eco-friendly alternative to reduce their environmental pollution.

Keywords GCL, calcium bentonite, activated carbon.

  1. INTRODUCTION

    A GCL is a manufactured hydraulic barrier consisting of bentonite sandwiched between two woven geotextiles. The geotextile may be a woven one or a non woven one. Bentonite having low permeability imparts better hydraulic performance to the GCL to act as liner, while the geotextile provides better shear strength to the composite. The geotextile also keeps the fine particles of bentonite intact. Over the past decade GCLs have gained wide-spread popularity as a substitute for compacted clay liners in cover systems and composite bottom liners. They are also used as environmental protection barriers in transportation facilities and storage tanks and as single liners for canals, ponds or surface impoundments. Geosynthetic clay liners are thin manufactured hydraulic barriers comprised of a thin layer of bentonite bonded to layers of geotextiles and/or a geomembrane. Presently International Standards Srganizations (ISO) refer to them as clay geosynthetic barriers. Over the past decade design engineers and environmental engineers have shown great interest in the use of geosynthetic clay liners as an alternative to compacted clay covers or else in some cases bottom lining of waste containment facilities because they often have low hydraulic conductivity and also inexpensive. GCLs are used as environmental protection barriers in transportation

    Aswathy S

    Assistant professor: Department of Civil Engineering

    Marian Engineering College Trivandrum, India

    facilities (roads and railways) to minimize pollution of subsurface strata from accidental spills and seepage of chemicals or as secondary liners for storage tanks at fuel stations for ground water protection and single liners for canals, ponds or surface impoundments site.

  2. EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION

    1. Material used

      The bentonite used for this study was collected from the Perumbavoor region of the Ernakulam district. It is a low permeable clay with high swelling properties.Bentonite is commonly used in GCLs. The initial properties of the soil was determined by standard test in laboratory. The table 1 shows the initial properties of the bentonite clay

      TABLE 1 PROPERTIES OF CALCIUM BENTONITE

      Parameters

      Value

      Initial water content (%)

      110

      Specific gravity

      2.26

      Liquid limit (%)

      110

      Plastic limit (%)

      54

      Plasticity index

      56

      Shrinkage limit (%)

      55

      Sand (%)

      6.3

      Silt (%)

      16.2

      Clay (%)

      77.5

      Optimum moisture content (%)

      19.12

      Maximum dry density (g/cc)

      1.463

      Clasification based on plasticity characteristics

      CH

      UCC (KN/m2)

      91.35

      Activated carbon also called activated charcoal, is a form of carbon processed to have small, low volume pores that increase the surface area available for adsorption or chemical reaction. Due to its high degree of microporosity just one gram of activated carbon has a surface area in excess of 1,3000 m2(14,000 sq ft) as determined by gas adsorption. Two types of activated carbon is used here.powdered activated carbon and granular activated carbon

      TABLE 2 PROPERTIES OF GRANULAR ACTIVATED CARBON

      Parameters

      Value

      Specific gravity

      1.83

      Liquid limit(%)

      87

      plasticity

      Non plastic

      TABLE 3 PROPERTIES OF POWDERED ACTIVATED CARBON

      Parameters

      Value

      Specific gravity

      .76

      Liquid limit(%)

      113

      plasticity

      Non plastic

    2. Methodology

    Liquid limit was tested according to IS 2720.Cone penotrometer was used to find the liquid limit values. Both powdered and granular activated carbon was amended with calcium bentonite at varying percentages.

  3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

VARIATION IN LIQUID LIMIT OF BENTONITE WITH VARYING PERCENTAGE OF ACTIVATED CARBON

160

i

l 140 PAC

q 120 GAC

u 100

i 80

d

60

l 40

i 20

m 0

i

t 0 5 10 15

( % of activated carbon added

%

)

Fig. 2 Variation Of Liquid Limit With Varying Percentages Of AC

VARIATION IN PLASTIC LIMIT OF BENTONITE WITH VARYING PERCENTAGE OF ACTIVATED CARBON

p 55

l 54

a 53

s 52

GAC

t 51

i 50

c 49

48

l 47

The graph shows an increasing trend of liquid limit for both PAC and GAC.this can be explained by the high water absorbtion capacity of both PAC and GAC due to the presence of increased amount of micropores in activated carbon.From the analysis of graphs it can be seen that there is a slight increase in the liquid limit value of bentonite amended with PAC than bentonite those added with GAC at varying percentages .This is due to the higher specific surface area of PAC than GAC.The second graph shows a decreasing trend in the plastic limit of both PAC and GAC.

IV CONCLUSION

In this project, an experimental study to obtain the variation in liquid limit of calcium bentonite with amendment of activated carbon was investigated. From the observations the following conclusions were drawn

  1. The amendment of activated carbon increases the sorption behaviour of the clay liner.

  2. The liquid limit value of both PAC and GAC increases with increase in carbon content upto 10%

  3. The increase in liquid limit is due to the high micro pores present in the activated carbon

  4. The liquid limit of PAC is greater than that of GAC and is due to the high specific area of PAC when compared to GAC

REFERENCES

[1]. Michael A. Malusis and Joseph scalia(2007). Hydraulic conductivity of an activated carbon-

amended geosynthetic clay liner journal of geo- environment ASCE

[2]. Sabrina L. Bradshaw and craig H. Benson(2013). Effect of municipal solid waste leachate on hydrau lic Conductivity and exchange complex of geosynthetic clay liners journal of geotechnical and geo-environmental ASCE

[3]. Sabrina L. Bradshaw A.M. Craig H. Benson, F. And Tammy L. Rauen(2015).

[4]. Hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners to recirculated municipal solid waste leachates journal of geotechnical and geo-environmental ASCE

[5]. Robert J. Petrov,l R. Kerry rowe,and robert M. Quigley(2014). Selected factors influencing gcl hydraulic conductivity journal of geotechnical a nd geo- environmental ASCE

[6]. Janice L. Rubll and david E. Daniet(2014).Geosynthetic clay liners permeated wi th chemical solutions and leachates

i

m 0 5

PAC

10 15

journal of geotechnical and geo-environmental ASCE

[7]. Andal mudimby, M.Chandrasekhar and,

t

i % of activated carbon added

G.K.Viswanadh(2013). Diffusion characteristics of geosynthetic clay liners amended with partial

Fig. 3 Variation Of plastic Limit With Varying Percentages Of AC

replacement of bentonite by flyash textiles and l ight industrial science and technology

[8]. Kumar, R. and Jain P. K., (2013): Expansive soft soil improvement by Geogrid encased granular pile, International Journal on Emerging Technologies 4(1): 55- 61

[9]. Mir, B. A. and Juneja. A., (2010): Strength behavior of composite ground reinforced with sand columns, Indian Geo technical Conference

[10]. Sivakumar, K., D, Mc Kelvey., J. Graham and D. Hughes., (2004) : Triaxial tests on model sand columns in clay,

Canadian Geo technical Journal 41:299-312

[11]. Y.KChow.,(1996):Settlement analysis of sand compaction pile, Japanese Geo technical Society 36(1):111-113

[12]. Sari, W., Abusharar., and Jie Han.,(2010):Two- dimensional deep-seated slope stability analysis of embankments over stone column-improved soft clay,

Engineering Geology 120:103-110

[13]. ShadiS. Najjar., Salah Sadek.,and Tarek Maakaroun., (201 0): Effect of sand columns on the undrained load response of soft clays, Journal of Geo technical an d Geo environmental Engineering 136:1263-1277

[14]. Radhey S. Sharma., B. R, Phani Kumar., and G, Nagendra., (2004):Compressive load response of granular piles reinforced with geogrids , Canadian Geo technical Journal 41:187-192

Leave a Reply