Optimization of Traffic in GSM Network: to maintain the Capacity,Quality of Service and Coverage

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV5IS17010

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Optimization of Traffic in GSM Network: to maintain the Capacity,Quality of Service and Coverage

S. Nandhini

PG scholar

Dept. of Electronics and Communication PSG College of Technology Coimbatore, India

Dr. D. Sivaraj

Assistant Professor

Dept. of Electronics and Communication PSG College of Technology Coimbatore, India

Abstract To increase the number of mobile subscribers and to keep the subscribers satisfied with the delivered quality of service. Accurate traffic dimensioning plays an important role in telecommunications network planning and design, which is particularly important for the performance analysis of mobile and wireless networks.

Backend Network is designed and Dimensioned based on traffic. Machines are designed for limited capacity to provide unlimited calls. By expanding capacity for incoming traffic at their network end (i.e.) expanding POI we can overcome the issues in traffic. The network traffic have been evaluated and optimized by taking the weekday-weekend traffic data and expanding the POI during the POI congestion, in future by doing the E1 Augmentation. In order to achieve the best performance, service providers have to monitor and optimize their network continuously.

KeywordsPoint of Interconnection, E1 Augmentation, POI Congestion, monitor and optimize.

  1. INTRODUCTION

    GSM (Global System for Mobile Communication) is a digital cellular technology used for transmitting mobile voice and data services.GSM is a circuit-switched system that divides each 200 kHz channel into eight 25 kHz timeslots. GSM uses the TDMA technique for transmitting signals.GSM was developed using digital technology. It has an ability to carry 64 kbps to 120 Mbps of data rates [1]. It digitizes and compresses data, then sends it down through a channel, each in its own timeslot.

    GSM system is basically designed as a combination of three major subsystems as shown in Fig.1: the network subsystem (NSS), the radio subsystem (BSS), and the operation support subsystem (OSS). To ensure that network operators will have several sources of cellular infrastructure equipment, GSM decided to specify not only the air interface, but also the main interfaces that identify different parts. There are three dominant interfaces, namely, A interface between MSC (Mobile Switching Center) and BSC (Base Station Controller), A-bis Interface between BSC & BTS and an Um interface between the BTS (Base Transceiver Station) and MS (Mobile Station) [2].

    There are two types of channels in the air interface: Physical channels- is the time slots (TS). Logical channels- the specific type of information that is carried by the physical channel and its types are traffic channels (TCH)

    and control channel (CCH).There are again two types of traffic channels: The FR (Full rate) channel is a 13 kbps coded speech or data rate of 9.6,4.8 or 2.4 kbps. HR (Half rate) channel supports 6.5 kbps coded speech or data rate of

    4.8 or 2.4 kbps.

    Fig. 1 GSM System Architecture

    Presently GSM supports more than one billion mobile subscribers throughout the world. When the number of subscriber increases, network traffic and POI congestion will get increased.POI is the Point of Interconnectivity, every operator makes Interconnection with each other to Terminate Traffic. The Call set up success rate and Answer Seizure Ratio is one of the major KPI (Key Performance Indicator), which should be optimized to improve QoS [3]. The measurement of network quality and call success rates in telecommunications (i.e.) percentage of answered telephone calls with respect to the total call volume is called the ASR.

    Hence, in this paper the efficient way of monitoring the daily traffic at Busy hours for maintaining the utilization% between (70-80 %) is analyzed. And making the decision of augmenting E1 by evaluating the POI congestion% is proposed. The objective of the proposed work is to keep the subscriber satisfied with the delivered Quality of Service by analyzing and reducing the POI congestion.

  2. PROPOSED METHODOLOGY

    1. Parameters to be maintained

      During Optimization the main goal to achieve is to maximize coverage and capacity while meeting the Quality of Service as illustrated in Fig.2.Network planning and optimization requires the possibility for a fast evaluation of coverage and capacity.These are the three leading elements of any mobile network [4],

      1. Capacity: Subscribers or the traffic load that it can handle.

      2. Coverage: Distance that a wireless network can transmit data at a given data rate.

      3. QoS: Capability of the cellular network providers to provide a satisfactory service to end users.

        Fig. 2 Important Parameters to maintain

    2. Monitoring of daily traffic at peak hours

      Measurement of traffic within a network are used in many fundamental activities such as: Identification of traffic patterns and trends, Calculating the traffic intensity in a specific circuit, Monitoring the service, Dimensioning and managing the network, Checking the performance of the

      common channel signaling network. The traffic trend varies

      Subscriber it will always pass through POI. If Point of Interconnectivity is congested then Call will not be successful.

      Fig. 3 Point of Interconnectivity

      Reliance Jio services were commercially launched on 5th September 2016. On that period JIO Offered Free SIM to everybody and that too with Free Unlimited calls. Daily 2lakh new subscriber are getting added in JIO and millions of calls are coming to the network, which is making POI Congested as shown in Fig.4. And other operators are not ready to expand POI due to heavy Traffic, free calls from JIO network will increase traffic thus their system will be overloaded, due to this Jio calls are failing. If two operators A and B are not interconnect partners, then it would not be possible for a customer of Operator A to communicate with a customer of operator B, other operators need time to expand capacity for incoming traffic at their network end. Idea and Airtel has agreed to expand POI with JIO for traffic optimization.

      POI Congestion level

      Sep(2016) Oct(2016) Nov(2016) Dec(2016) Jan(2017) Feb(2017)

      48 51

      2

      1

      42 45

      3

      3

      37

      based on the offers, new plans etc. The ITU recommends that a network traffic analyst must take measurements for the busiest hour of each day for a whole year. To perform calculations in circuit-switched networks several

      2

      1

      5

      2

      0

      6

      1 11 8

      2

      1

      23

      1

      6 6

      11 8 12 8

      assumptions are made, which is useful to remember that the measurements are averages, and this process deliberately 1

      ignores very short term variations in the traffic.

      • Calls arrivals follow a Poisson distribution [14]

      • Holding times follow a Negative Exponential distribution

        4 4 5

        Idea

        Airtel

        Vodofone

        Jio

        Fig. 4 Level of POI Congestion

      • Blocked calls are lost or overflow

      • There is statistical equilibrium.

      Point of Interconnection allows the customers of one service provider (say Reliance JIO) to communicate with the customers of another service provider (say IDEA). For

      E.g. from the Fig.3, if JIO Subscriber is calling IDEA

    3. Traffic measurement and analysis

    A cellular telephone network must support moving customers, unlike a fixed network[5].Traffic design of a celular network is a key point of an operators task [6]. The Traffic which represents hours of calls in Erlang [2]. An Erlang is a unit of telecom traffic measurement, which represents the continuous use of one voice path.

    1) Functions of Erlang: To successfully design the network topology, to establish the necessary trunk group sizes and to work out how many lines are required between a telephone system and a central office or between multiple network locations.

    a. E1 Count Calculation: E1 count which represents the timeslots, with respect to the need it is get augmented.

    • 1STM(Synchronous Transport Module)= 63E1

    • 1E1=0-31(32 Timeslots) were 16th is allocated for signaling. So, 31 Timeslots.

    • 1STM=63×31=1953 Timeslots.

    • E1 count: 10E1=310 TS, 20E1=620 TS, 30E1=930

      TS etc

    • 1E1 carries signals at 2Mbps, i.e 32 channels carries signals at 64kbps each.

    • 1STM= 63E1=63x2Mbps=126Mbps

    TABLE I. CALCULATION OF CAPACITY UTILIZATION

    Peak traffic in Erlang

    Maximum Erlang handling

    Capacity Utilization

    330.32

    549

    60.17

    912.28

    885

    103.08

    Capacity Utilization = (Peak Traffic/Maximum Erlang handling) x 100 (1)

    According to Eq. (1), the Capacity Utilization is calculated on the basis of,

    i) By adding 10E1: 885+10E1=1195

    Capacity Utilization= (912.28/1195)x100=76.34 ii) By adding 15E1:885+15E1=1350

    Capacity Utilization= (912.28/1350)x100=67.57

    1. By adding 20E1: 885+20E1=1505

      Capacity Utilization=(912.28/1505)x100=60.61

      The Local Maintenance Tool (LMT) or Operation Maintenance Tool (OMT) [5] with an online database is responsible for collection of data on live networks as illustrated in Table.2. RJIO Outgoing to Idea Incoming POI report shows that the Utilization% in some months crosses the limit. Cellular network can be described as an Erlangs loss system and allowed congestion level (as a percentage) in Erlangs loss system is defined by the Grade of Service (GoS) [7].The simulation is used as the main modeling tool due to the diificulties faced in cellular mobile networks modeling.The analytic results evaluate network performance under a wide range of conditions,which can be computed comparitively easily and are essential in order to be able to use numerical optimization techniques for network design. Thus, in recent years a number of analytical frameworks were developed to obtain more general results

      and they are much more useful than simulation studies [5,8].

      TABLE II. TRAFFIC DATA ANALYSIS ( RJIO OG TO IDEA IC POI)

      Date

      E1

      Count

      NBH

      Traffic(in Erlang)

      Design Traffic with 0.2% GoS

      Utilization%

      5-Sep-16

      NA

      NA

      NA

      NA

      26-Sep-16

      NA

      NA

      NA

      NA

      12-Oct-16

      31

      950

      894

      106

      24-Oct-16

      50

      1,501

      1,471

      102

      7-Nov-16

      209

      5,327

      6,361

      84

      21-Nov-16

      299

      6,464

      7,864

      82

      5-Dec-16

      331

      6,558

      10,060

      65

      19-Dec-16

      331

      6,426

      10,060

      64

      9-Jan-17

      331

      10,113

      10,060

      101

      16-Jan-17

      372

      11,223

      11,312

      99

      30-Jan-17

      434

      11,984

      13,215

      91

      6-Feb-17

      453

      12,123

      13,835

      87

      20-Feb-17

      454

      12,237

      13,827

      79

      27-Feb-17

      454

      12,125

      15,281

      84

      Fig. 5 RJIO OG to IDEA IC POI

      By this way the capacity utilization is calculated and making the decision of how much E1 should be added to avoid the congestion. The Fig.5, shows the rise and fall of traffic data analysis from the month of October 2016 to February 2017.The Idea cellular Ltd which makes the Point of Interconnectivity with the private operators faces the POI congestion. To avoid that further actions are taken place as mentioned in Table.3.

      TABLE III. POI CONGESTION REPORT OF IDEA (DEC16- FEB17)

      Name of Circle and POIs

      Dec 2016

      Jan 2017

      Feb 2017

      Action taken report

      POI With Private Operators

      Airtel Local CBE

      11%

      8%

      4%

      4E1s augmented on

      5.12.16. No congestion now.

      Reliance Jio

      20%

      51%

      11%

      Testing completed for 6 E1s. Augmentation done on 16.1.17.

      Vodofone

      12%

      8%

      5%

      10E1s augmentation on

      13.2.17. No congestion now.

      Herewith the POI congestion report of one particular operator gives a clear idea about the action taken place during the rise in congestion%.

  3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    From the analysis of traffic data in RJIO outgoing to Idea incoming, in some months the capacity utilization crosses the limit it further causes the congestion in the network and makes the call success rate to go down. The call setup success rate is one of the key performance indicators (KPI) used by the network operators to assess the performance of their networks. It has the direct influence on the customer satisfaction with the service provided by the network and its operator.

    The operators of telecommunication networks aim at increasing the call setup success rate as much as practical and affordable. In mobile networks this is achieved by improving radio coverage, expanding the utilization capacity of the network and optimizing the performance of its elements, all of which may require considerable effort and significant investments on the part of the network operator.

    When comparing with the other private operators RJIO has reached the congestion higher from the month of October 2016.Even though it makes the availability of affordable and effective communication for citizens. Due to increase in subscriber when compared with an other private operator, the congestion% also get increased. The POI Congestion % is calculated from the traffic analysis, in order to reduce this and to maintain the utilization%, the E1 augmentation has to be taken place in future to avoid call failures. Which is nothing but, by increasing the timeslots the capacity of the network is get increased. And the network utilization% is maintained only by continuous monitoring.

    TABLE IV. ANALYSIS OF POI CONGESTION% FOR IDEA OG TO RJIO IC POI

    Date

    POI

    Congestion%

    5-Sep-16

    NA

    26-Sep-16

    36

    12-Oct-16

    27

    24-Oct-16

    24

    7-Nov-16

    11

    21-Nov-16

    0

    5-Dec-16

    0

    19-Dec-16

    0

    9-Jan-17

    0

    16-Jan-17

    0

    30-Jan-17

    0

    6-Feb-17

    0

    20-Feb-17

    0

    27-Feb-17

    0

    Fig. 6 POI Congestion%

    The Fig.6, and Fig.7, is compared and analysed that,

      1. The POI congestion% is increased on the month of September 2016 and gradually decreased on the month of December 2016 in Idea incoming to RJIO outgoing POI. It practically shows that the usage of network becomes reduced.

      2. The POI congestion% is started increased from the month of October 2016 due to offers and new plans in RJIO incoming to Idea outgoing POI. It practically shows that the usage of network becomes increased.

        After analyzing this, the capacity of the network has to be increased by increasing the timeslots.

        TABLE V. ANALYSIS OF POI CONGESTION% FOR RJIO OG TO IDEA IC POI

        Date

        POI

        Congestion%

        5-Sep-16

        NA

        26-Sep-16

        NA

        12-Oct-16

        26

        24-Oct-16

        22

        7-Nov-16

        4

        21-Nov-16

        2

        5-Dec-16

        0

        19-Dec-16

        0

        9-Jan-17

        21

        16-Jan-17

        19

        30-Jan-17

        11

        6-Feb-17

        7

        20-Feb-17

        0

        27-Feb-17

        4

        Fig. 7 POI Congestion%

        1. Further Steps to be carried out in future

    • E1 Augmentation, after analyzing the Congestion%.

    • Free ports in Media Gateway are allocated to Transmission team.

    • Mux to Mux connectivity from one operator to other.

    • KLM mapping.

    • To find out the working mode of E1.

    • Loop and break checking.

    • Circuit Identification Code (CIC) matching.

    • Continuity Check for every CIC.

  4. CONCLUSION

The proposed work optimizes the traffic in GSM Network to maintain the three important parameters which is nothing but the Capacity, Quality of Service and Coverage. This paper presents the extensive study of a GSM network utilization of particular operator. The experimental analysis focused on the following parameters i) Network Busy hour traffic (in Erlang), ii) Design traffic with 0.2% Grade of Service, iii) E1 count and iv)Utilization%. These findings prove to be useful to network planning engineers as they provide them the data that help decide on timely and efficient management and investment on infrastructure. Future work is to reduce the POI Congestion and to maintain the utilization% between 70-80% by doing the E1 augmentation, which optimizes the network by improving the call success rate. Further analysis of traffic has to be taken place on the month of March 2017 with the expectation of 0%-congestion to ignore short term variations in the traffic during the peak hour and to maintain the utilization%.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Our thanks to the officers of Idea Cellular Ltd who had contributed towards the measurement of Traffic on live GSM Network.

REFERENCES

  1. Minakshi Kumari and Manoj Singh,Vehicle Theft Intimation Using GSM, International Journal of Computational Engineering Research (IJCER) , Vol. 4, Issue. 8, August 2014.

  2. Madhusmita Panda and Saraju Prasad Padhy,Traffic analysis and optimization of GSM network, IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Special Issue, Vol. 1, Issue 1, Nov 2011.

  3. Bilal Haider, M. Zafrullah and M. K. Islam Radio Frequency Optimization & QoS Evaluation in Operational GSM Network Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science 2009 Vol I.

  4. Joseph Isabona, Maximising Coverage and Capacity with QOS Guarantee in GSM Network by Means of Cell Cluster Optimization, (IJARPS) International Journal of Advanced Research in Physical Science,Issue 6,Vol.1,Oct 2014.

  5. H.Khedher and S.Tabbane,Traffic Characterization for mobile Networks, IEEE Journal, Digital Object Identifier:0-7803-7467- 3/02 ,PP-1485 -1489,2002

  6. Z.Opechowski and L. M Correia , Analysis of Traffic distribution in GSM , IEEE Journal, Digial Object Identifier 0- 7803-7467-3/02 , 2002.

  7. Vedran Novak, Cell Load Sharing Feature And Traffic Optimization

    in Gsm Network,Faculty of Traffic and Transport Engineering, Belgrade,2000.

  8. Daehyoung Hong and Stephen S. Rappaport, Traffic model and performance analysis for cellular mobile radio telephone systems with prioritized and nonprioritized handoff procedures,IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. vt-35, no. 3, August 1986.

  9. Kin K. Leung, William A. Massey, and Ward Whitt, Traffic models for wireless communication networks, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol.12, no.8, October 1994.

  10. Kurt Majewski and Andrzej Maciolek, Capacity evaluation for multi-layer GSM networks with voice and data traffic,IEEE International Telecommunications Network Strategy and Planning Symposium-Networks 2008.

  11. S.Almeida, J. Queijo and L.M Correia Spatial and temporal traffic distribution models for GSMIEEE VTS 50th Vehicular Technology Conference VTC ,1999.

  12. M.Mouly and pautet Marie-Bernadette, Current Evolution of the GSM system, IEEE Personal Communications, PP.9-19,1995

  13. E. Chlebus and W. Ludwin, Is handoff traffic really Poissonean, in Proc.Of ICUPC95, IEEE International Conference on Universal Personal Communications, pp. 348-353, Tokyo, Japan, Nov.1995.

  14. Theodore Rappaport ,Wireless Communications: Principles and Practice, 2nd Edition.

  15. Roger. L Freeman ,Telecommunication System Engineering, 4th Edition.

  16. Roger. L Freeman ,Radio System Design fot Telecommunication, 3rd Edition.

  17. Sajal Kumar Das ,Mobile Terminal Receiver Design: LTE and LTE-Advanced 1st Edition.

  18. Michel Terre, Mylene Pischella, Emmanuelle Vivier, Wireless Telecommunication Systems 1st Edition.

  19. Martin SauterFrom GSM to LTE-Advanced Pro and 5G: An Introduction to Mobile Networks and Mobile Broadband, 3rd Edition.

  20. Timo Halonen , Javier Romero , Juan Melero GSM, GPRS and EDGE Performance: Evolution Towards 3G/UMTS, 2nd Edition.

Leave a Reply