Behaviour of Rc Columns Strengthened by Tensile Reinforced Cyclic Mortar

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV11IS02042

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Behaviour of Rc Columns Strengthened by Tensile Reinforced Cyclic Mortar

J.Divya Bharathi1 B. Sekar2

1 P.G Student, 2 Asst. Proff Civil Dept., M.I.E.T. ENGINEERING COLLEGE TRICHY -07

Abstract – In last decades, the issue of upgrading existing structures has been of great importance because of their deterioration, ageing, environmental induced degradation, a lack of maintenance, or the need to meet the current design requirements. TRM combines high-strength fibers in the form of textiles (with open-mesh configuration) with inorganic matrices, such as cementitious hydraulic-lime- based mortars. TRM is low-cost, friendly for manual workers, fire resistant, compatible with concrete and masonry substrate material and can be applied on wet surfaces or at low temperature. For all these reasons, the use of TRM is progressively becoming more attractive for the strengthening of existing structures. This project presents experimental program results in basalt TRM as retrofitting jackets to improve the seismic performance of square reinforced concrete columns.

Keywords: columns, TRM retrofitting, FRCM. Introduction

Textile Reinforced Mortar (TRM) is a composite material used in structural strengthening of existing buildings, mostly in seismic retrofitting. Tensile Reinforced Mortar jacketing is quite effective as means of increasing the cyclic deformation capacity of old type reinforced concrete columns with poor detailing, by delaying bar buckling and prevents split bond failures in columns with lap-spliced bars. This

research work aimed to investigate and evaluate the seismic performance of conventional and strengthened RC column under constant axial and reversed cyclic lateral loading. The response, including the failure modes, hysteretic behavior, lateral bearing capacity, and displacement are analyzed. A new group of TRM composites has recently appeared due to the availability of basalt fiber, which are obtained by extrusion from a basalt-based molten volcanic rock. The basalt fiber is non- toxic, natural, eco-friendly and environmentally safe. Characterized by their relatively superior modulus, highstrength, excellent stability and resistance to chemical erosion and high temperatures. Basalt fiber possesses higher material properties (such as tensile strength and elastic modulus) than glass fiber and are far cheaper than carbon fiber. Typical steel- reinforced construction is 100-300 mm thick, while a TRC structure is generally 50mm thick. Basalt fiber is made from a single material, crushed basalt, from a carefully chosen quarry source. Basalt of high acidity (over 46 % silica content) and low iron content is considered desirable for fiber production. The basalt is simply washed and then melted. The manufacture of basalt fiber requires the melting of the crushed and washes basalt rock at about 1,5000C (2,7300F). The basalt fibers typically have a filament diameter of between 10 and 20µm. Basalt textiles in mesh geometry are used for reinforcement and GFRC is used as the cement-based matrix of the formed composite jacketing.

Objectives

  • To investigate the effectiveness of a new structural material, namely textile reinforced mortar (TRM).

  • To improve the axial and shear strength of reinforced concrete columns by retrofitting TRM jackets.

  • To increase the deformation capacity and strength of retrofitted columns by the use of TRM jackets.

  • To found out the solution for confinement of RC columns, including poorly detailed ones with or without lap splices by TRM jacketing.

Materials

Cement is one of the most used material when it comes to construction. Ordinary Portland cement (53 grade) confirming to IS 8112-1989 was used. Specific gravity of cement is 3.16. Fineness percentage of cement is 0.1%. Initial setting time is 30 min. Final setting time for cement OPC 53 grade is 6 hours. Fine aggregate consists of natural sand or crushed stone. Specific gravity of fine aggregate is 2.6. Fineness modulus is 3.204. coarse aggregate is derived from rock, the shape, size, the texture, hardness and other properties may vary depending on locations. Specific gravity of coarse aggregate is 2.8. Fineness modulus of coarse aggregate is 5.28

Mix Proportion

Materials

Quantity

Cement

429 kg /m3

Fine aggregate

716.25 kg /m3

Coarse aggregate

953.75 kg /m3

PVA Fiber

PVA fibers creating a multi-directional fiber network providing shrinkage control, thermal expansion, contraction and abrasion control.

PVA fibers are monofilament fibers that disperse throughout the matrix. Fiber length used is 12mm.

Element Specification

The column used in the study is designed as short column with aspect ratio 0.1. The column specimen consists a portion of beam and footing. Two scaled columns are casted, one is conventional column and another column is retrofitted with five layers of basalt TRM.

Fig. 1 Reinforced details of column

Retrofitting procedure

In retrofitting process the first step involves the thin layer of the concrete cover is removed and the surface is made rough. Then the basalt textile mesh is wrapped around the full height of the column and tied properly with the corners of the specimen receiving TRM were rounded off to radius in order to reduce the stress concentration. The first layer of thin mortar was applied over the textile mesh and the surface mesh and the surface is made even with the help

of trowel. Then the mortar layer was allowed to set for few minutes. Until all the layers are applied this process is repeated. After retrofitting the specimen is cured with water for 28 days.

Fig 2 Fig 3 Fig 4 Roughening Wrapping Application of of surface of TRM cement matrix

Fig 5 Conventional Fig 6 Retrofitted Column Column

Test setup

Each specimen was subjected to combined actions of cyclic loads and axial loads. In hydraulic jack the axial compression was applied and a load cell was connected to the control system of hydraulic jack to keep the load constant. The type of loading given by actuator is quasi-static loading. The axial load given through hydraulic jack is 20KN. The lateral displacement was applied with the help of horizontal actuator of 1000KN mounted to the steel reaction frame. By using Linear Voltage

Displacement Transducer the imposed lateral displacement was measured. The schematic test setup and photograph of test setup was shown in Fig 7 & Fig 8.

Fig 7 Schematic setup

Fig 8 Photograph of test setup

-9.1

4.813

-7.8

-10.3

4.805

-8.1

-11.6

4.817

-8.2

-12.8

4.820

-8.4

Crack Patterns

The crack patterns observed after testing, the conventional and retrofitted columns are shown in fig 9 & fig 10.

Table 2.Test results of strengthened column

LOAD (KN)

STROKE

(mm)

LVDT DISPLACEMENT

(mm)

18.6

-9.875

22.5

16.4

-9.860

20.6

14.2

-9.880

18.6

13.6

-9.851

17.6

12.4

-9.852

16.5

10.6

-9.852

15.4

8.2

-9.851

12.4

6.6

-9.850

10.6

5.4

-9.852

8.4

4.21

-9.852

6.8

2.2

-9.853

2.24

1.4

-9.853

1.5

0.6

-9.853

0.4

-0.2

-9.853

-0.6

-1.8

-9.852

-3.2

-2.4

-9.853

-4.8

-4.2

-9.854

-6.7

-5.1

-9.850

-7.6

-6.3

-9.850

-8.2

-7.6

-9.864

-9.8

-8.8

-9.867

-10.2

-9.4

-9.883

-11.6

-10.8

-9.883

-12.6

-12.2

-9.883

-14.2

Fig 9 Crack patterns Fig 10 Joint failure

of conventional column of retrofitted column Results and Discussion

Test Results

Table 1.Test results of conventional column

Load (KN)

STROKE(mm)

LVDT DISPLACEMENT

(mm)

12.2

4.682

8.2

11.4

4.830

7.8

10.2

6.831

7.4

9.6

4.829

6.9

8.4

4.830

6.4

7.8

4.830

5.95

6.6

4.827

5.3

5.4

4.831

4.8

4.2

4.828

4.3

3.8

4.818

3.8

2.6

4.818

2.7

1.4

4.817

1.6

0.21

4.818

0.4

-1.8

4.819

-1.76

-2.6

4.818

-2.5

-3.4

4.818

-3.6

-4.2

4.817

-4.6

-5.8

4.817

-6.2

-8.2

4.808

-7.7

Load Displacement Graph

Load Displacement Graph for conventional column

Volume 11, Issue 02

Published by, www.ijert.org

221

Load Displacement Graph for retrofitted column

Conclusion

  • The first crack was observed in the control specimen at a load of 8.4 KN under cyclic loading and the yield load was noted at

    12.8 KN when the column is under yielding of reinforcement and concrete.

  • Comparatively in strengthened specimen first crack was observed at 14.2 KN and the maximum displacement of column is 22.5 mm reached when the column takes the final load carrying capacity of 18.6 KN.

  • The above conclusion prove that RC Column after strengthening is much more seismic resistant than that of the conventional column.

References

  1. Bournas D. A., Lontou P. V., Papanicolaou C. G., and Triantafillou T. C. (2017), Textile- Reinforced Mortar versus Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Confinement in Reinforced Concrete Columns, ACI structural journal, Vol. 104, pp.740-748

  2. Caggegi, Lanoye, Djama, Bassil, Gabor (2017), Tensile behaviour of a basalt TRM strengthening system: Influence of mortar and reinforcing textile ratios, Composites Part B, Vol. 130, pp.90-102

  3. Dinh N. H., Park S. H. & Choi K. K. (2019), Seismic performance of reinforced concrete columns retrofitted by textile-reinforced mortar jackets, Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, Vol. 16, pp.1364-1381

  4. Du Y., Zhang M., Zhou F., Zhu D. (2017), Experimental study on basalt textile reinforced concrete under uniaxial tensile loading, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 138, pp.88-100

  5. Feng R., Li Y., Zhu J, Xing F. (2020), Behavior of corroded circular RC columns strengthened by C-FRCM under cyclic loading, Engineering Structures, Vol. 226, pp.11131

  6. Gopinath S., Prakash A., Ahmed F. (2020), Flexural impact response and energy absorption characteristics of textile reinforced mortar, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 262, pp.120630

  7. IS 10262-2019, Indian standard recommended guide lines for concrete mix design, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

  8. IS 12269-2013, Indian standard specification for 53 grade ordinary Portland cement, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

  9. IS 383-2016, Indian standard code of practice for specification for coarse and fine aggregate from natural sources for concrete, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

  10. IS 4031-1988, Indian standard method of physical tests for hydraulic cement, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

  11. IS 456-2000, Indian standard plain and reinforced concrete – code of practice, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

  12. IS 516-1959, Indian standard code of methods of test for strength of concrete, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

  13. IS 5816-1999, Indian standard splitting tensile strength of concrete- method of test, Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

  14. Koutas L. N., Bournas D. A. (2020), Confinement of masonry columns with textile- reinforced mortar jackets, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 258, pp.120343

  15. Koutas L. N., Tetta Z., Bournas D. A. and Thanasis C. Triantafillou (2018), Strengthening of concrete structures with textile reinforced mortars, Journal of Composites for Construction, Vol. 23, pp.03118001

  16. Li B., Xiong H., Jiang J., Dou X. (2018), Tensile behavior of basalt textile grid reinforced Engineering Cementitious

    Composite, Composites Part B, Vol. 156, pp.185-200

  17. Ming L., Shi-Ping Y. and Xi C. (2019), Seismic behavior of textile-reinforced concretestrengthened RC columns under different axial compression ratios, Engineered fibers and fabrics, Vol. 14, pp.1-11

  18. Padalu, Singh , Das (2018), Efficacy of basalt fibre reinforced cement mortar composite for out-of-plane strengthening of unreinforced masonry, Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 191, pp.1172-1190

  19. Shamseldein A., ELgabbas F., Elshafie H. (2021), Tensile behavior of basalt textile- reinforced mortar (BTRM), Ain Shams Engineering Journal, Vol. 13, pp.101488

  20. Shen D., Li M, Kang J., Liu C., Li C. (2020), Experimental study on the seismic performance of RC columns retrofitted by lap-spliced textile- reinforced mortar jackets after high-temperature exposure, Composite Structures, Vol. 256, pp.113108

  21. Wang J., Wan C., Zeng Q., Shen L, Malik

    M. A., Yan D. (2019), Effect of eccentricity on retrofitting efficiency of basalt textile reinforced concrete on partially damaged masonry columns, Composite Structures, Vol. 232, pp.111585

  22. Yao Li, Yin S., Lv H. (2020), Combined effects of dry-wet cycles and sustained loads on the seismic behavior of TRC-strengthened RC columns, Structures, Vol. 33, pp.2226-2237.