Evaluation of Ultra High Performance Concrete Exposed to Elevated Temperature

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV13IS050168

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Evaluation of Ultra High Performance Concrete Exposed to Elevated Temperature

Under the guidance of

Presented by:

Suma T N

Assistant professor, Department of civil engineering GMIT, Bharathinagara

Mandya, India

Abstract Abstract: In this study, an extensive literature review has been conducted on the material characterization of UHPC and its potential for large-scale field applicability. UHPC structures can be more vulnerable to fire and elevated temperatures due to its reduced porosity, which hinders the release of vapor pressure, leading to physical damage. However, the use of polypropylene (PP) fibers can mitigate this issue. The successful production of ultra-highperformance concrete (UHPC) depends on its material ingredients and mixture proportioning, which leads to denser and relatively more homogenous particle packing. A database was compiled from various research and field studies around the world on the mechanical and durability performance of UHPC. It is shown that UHPC provides a viable and long-term solution for improved sustainable construction owing to its ultrahigh strength properties, improved fatigue behavior and very low porosity, leading to excellent resistance against aggressive environments. The literature review revealed that the curing regimes and fiber dosage are the main factors that control the mechanical and durability properties of UHPC. Currently, the applications of UHPC in construction are very limited due to its higher initial cost, lack of contractor experience and the absence of widely accepted design provisions. However, sustained research progress in producing UHPC using locally available materials under normal curing conditions should reduce its material cost. Current challenges regarding the implementation of UHPC in full- scale structures are highlighted. This study strives to assist engineers, consultants, contractors and other construction industry stakeholders to better understand the unique characteristics and capabilities of UHPC, which should demystify this resilient and sustainable construction material.

Lavanya H 4MG18CV018 Puneeth D – 4MG21CV411 Preetham R- 4MG21CV411

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC) is a novel construction material exhibiting enhanced mechanical and durability properties, which can lead to economical construction through reducing the cross sections of structural members with associated materials savings and lower installation and labour costs (Tang 2004). The relatively high initial cost of UHPC has restricted its wider use in the construction industry. However, ongoing research and investigations are filling knowledge gaps in order to commence innovative UHPC having reduced initial cost. Furthermore, the development and wide acceptance of an UHPC design code provisions should encourage stakeholders in the construction industry to implement large scale applications. This becomes even more relevant with the more recent push by organizations such as the American Concrete Institute, which identified using high-strength steel reinforcement in concrete as a top research priority. Combining UHPC and high-strength steel is expected to yield unique structures in the near future. UHPC potential applications include tall structures, rehabilitation works, structural and nonstructural elements, machine parts and military structures. Lighter weight structures owing to smaller cross sections can be made using UHPC. Therefore, UHPC can be effectively utilized in the precast concrete industry. Moreover, UHPC was widely used in pedestrian footbridges and highway bridges. For example, the first UHPC footbridge in Canada was constructed in 1997. In the United States, Wapello County Mars Hill was the first highway transportation bridge constructed with UHPC in 2006. In the Kinzua Dam Stilling Basin, UHPC was used for rehabilitation and strengthening purposes. Furthermore, architecturally and aesthetically appealing structures can be made using UHPC (Schmidt et al. 2004, 2012; Fehling et al. 2008). Table 1 summarizes some of the existing UHPC applications around the world. In the present study, an extensive review of literature on UHPC properties was conducted and summarized in tabular representation for a user friendly access to this scattered information.

  2. OBJECTIVES OF THE PRESENT STUDY

    1. To determine optimum proportion of raw materials to prepare UHPC by incorporating Hybrid Fibres. ii. To obtain UHPC of strength greaterthan150 MPa by varying percentage of fibres. iii. To determine optimum percentage of cementitious material to obtain UHPC,

      1. Limestone powder.

      2. Ground granulated blast-furnace slag or sugarcane bagasse ash. iv. Mechanical performance of UHPC under 2hours of standard fire or through electric oven.

  3. METHODOLOGY

    The concrete specimens are tested for various temperature i.e., 100, 200, 300 and 400. The materials were weighed as per mix design were considered. The ingredients materials were mixed till homogeneous mix was achieved. The cubes of 150mm size and cylinders of 150mm diameter are casted and compacted using needle vibrator. The specimens were casted without reinforcements. After casting the concrete specimens, it is dried for 24 hours. After 24 hours of drying, it is subjected to curing for 7 hours and then cubes are demoulded and kept in normal temperature water for about 2 hours. The specimens should be ensured to dry completely as excess moisture content may lead to disintegration or spalling of concrete specimen during the time of heating, these is due to the excess pore vapor pressure developed inside the concrete specimens when subjected to temperature. After subjecting to elevated temperature specimens were allowed to cool for 24 hours to room temperature in air. The crack pattern, change in colour, mass loss of the specimen are studied after exposure to elevated temperature.

    After cooling of the specimens destructive tests was carried out:

    • UHPC_1 = UHPC_C_WF = UHPC without fibres.

    • UHPC_2 = UHPC_C_SF = UHPC with 20% by its weight of steel fibre.

    • UHPC_3 = UHPC_C_HF = UHPC with 20% by its weight of hybrid fibre (18% Steel fibre and 2% of cement of polypropylene fibre).

    • UHPC_4 = UHPC_CLR_WF = UHPC with lime stone powder and sugarcane bagasse ash without fibres.

    • UHPC_5 = UHPC_CLR_SF = UHPC with mineral admixtures like limestone powder and sugarcane bagasse ash and also 20% by its weight of steel fibre.

    • UHPC_6 = UHPC_CLR_HF = UHPC with miner admixtures like limestone powder and sugarcane bagasse ash and also 20% by its weight of hybrid fibre (18% Steel fibre and 2% of cement of polypropylene fibre).

  4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

Quantifying various parameters such as Compressive strength of UHPC before exposed to fire and after exposed to fire, workability and mass loss plays an important role along with the design mix. So, the evaluation of the same is crucial for accessing the efficiency of UHPC. The same is carried out and the results as obtained below.

Table.1. Compressive strength of design mix exposed to elevated temperature

Compressive strength in KN/m3

Temp

.

in °C

UHC_ 1

UHPC_2

UHPC_3

UHPC_ 4

UHPC_5

UHPC_6

30

112.3

123.6

3

121.7

7

97.6

116.9

9

109.5

1

50

80.7

98.6

100.3

70.8

7

93.4

85.7

100

56.04

77.34

81.8

49.7

5

72.56

68.04

200

63.47

68.9

54.18

48.56

300

54.2

37.82

400

29.43

Table.2. Final design mix adopted from the literature

Proportions

UHPC_1

UHPC_2

UHPC_3

UHPC_4

UHPC_5

UHPC_6

Cement

(kg/m3)

1050

950

950

900

840

840

M-Sand

(kg/m3)

1100

1100

1100

1100

1100

1100

Silica fume

(kg/m3)

268

268

268

268

268

268

Steel fiber

(kg/m3)

190

170

168

151

Polypropylene

fiber (kg/m3)

19

16.8

Lime stone

powder (kg/m3)

190

190

190

Sugarcane bagasse ash

(kg/m3)

95

95

95

Water (kg/m3)

210

190

190

180

168

168

CONCLUSION:

    1. The ultimate compressive strength achieved in the considered mix designs is 123.63 MPa for the design mix UHPC_2. The UHPC_2 was prepared using only steel fibres.

    2. The optimum percentage of steel fibre adopted in UHPC_2 is 20% by weight of cement.

    3. The ultimate compressive strength achieved in UHPC with hybrid fibre was 121.77 MPa (UHPC_3) and this mix contained 18% steel fibre and 2% polypropylene fibre.

    4. The ultimate compressive strength achieved in UHPC_5 with limestone and sugarcane bagasse ash is 116.99 MPa and the mix consists of steel fibres of 20% by weight of cement.

      In this study on the distinctive features of UHPC. The unique properties of UHPC have several advantages over normal strength concrete (NSC) owing to its material ingredients and composition. The key factor in producing UHPC is to improve the micro and macro properties of its mixture constituents to ensure mechanical homogeneity and denser particle packing. UHPC yields high compressive strength (i.e. [150 MPa] (22 ksi)) due to its improved internal micro- and macrostructure, leading to denser concrete. The application of thermal curing further densifies UHPC, which results in higher compressive strength properties. The typical heat treatment applied for UHPC is 90400 C (194752 F) for 26 days. The specimen size significantly affects the measured compressive strength of UHPC. Smaller size specimens can be used if the test machine capacity is limited.

      REFERENCE:

      1. Ahmad, S., Rasul, M., Adekunle, S. K., AlDulaijan, S. U., Maslehuddin, M., & Ali, S. I. (2019). Mechanical properties of steel fiberreinforced UHPC mixtures exposed to elevated temperature: Effects of exposure duration and fiber content. Composites Part B: Engineering, 168, 291-301.

      2. Xue, C., Yu, M., Xu, H., Xu, L., Saafi, M., & Ye, J. (2023).

        Compressive performance and deterioration mechanism of ultra- high performance concrete with coarse aggregates under and after heating. Journal of Building Engineering, 64, 105502

      3. Liang, X., Wu, C., Su, Y., Chen, Z., & Li, Z. (2018).

        Development of ultra-high performance concrete with high fire resistance. Construction and Building Materials, 179, 400-412.

      4. Missemer, L., Ouedraogo, E., Malecot, Y., Clergue, C., & Rogat,

        D. (2019). Fire spalling of ultra-high performance concrete: From a global analysis to microstructure investigations. Cement and Concrete Research, 115, 207-219.

      5. Fu, D., Xia, C., Xu, S., Zhang, C., & Jia, X. (2022). Effect of concrete composition on drying shrinkage behavior of ultra-high performance concrete. Journal of Building Engineering, 62, 105333.

      6. Jiao, Y., Zhang, Y., Guo, M., Zhang, L., Ning, H., & Liu, S. (2020). Mechanical and fracture properties of ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) containing waste glass sand as

        partial replacement material. Journal of Cleaner Production, 277, 123501.

      7. Du, J., Meng, W., Khayat, K. H., Bao, Y., Guo, P., Lyu, Z., … & Wang, H. (2021).

        New development of ultra-high-performance concrete (UHPC). Composites Part B: Engineering, 224, 109220.

      8. Zhu, Y., Hussein, H., Kumar, A., & Chen, G. (2021). A review: Material and structural properties of UHPC at elevated temperatures or fire conditions. Cement and Concrete

        Composites, 123, 104212.

      9. Li, Y., & Zhang, D. (2021). Effect of lateral restraint and inclusion of polypropylene and steel fibers on spalling behavior, pore pressure, and thermal stress in ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) at elevated temperature. Construction and Building Materials, 271, 121879.

      10. Li, J., Wu, Z., Shi, C., Yuan, Q., & Zhang, Z. (2020). Durability of ultra-high performance concreteA review. Construction and Building Materials, 255, 119296.

      11. Soliman, N. A., & Tagnit-Hamou, A. (2017). Partial substitution of silica fume with fine glass powder in UHPC: Filling the micro gap. Construction and Building Materials, 139, 374-383.

      12. ACI Committee 239. (2018). Ultra-high-performance Concrete: An Emerging Technology Report (ACI 239R18). American Concrete Institute.

      13. INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. (1999). ISO

        834: fire-resistance tests: elements of building construction-part 1.1: general requirements for fire resistance testing.

      14. Standard, I. (1963). IS 2386-3: Methods of test for aggregates for concrete, Part 3: Specific gravity, density, voids, absorption and bulking. Indian Standard, New Delhi.

      15. Standard, I. (2016). IS: 383 (2016) Coarse and fine aggregate for concrete specification. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

      16. Standard, I. (2004). 1199 (1959). Methods of sampling and analysis of concrete. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India.

      17. WaterSpecification, I. S. D. (2012). Bureau of Indian Standards. New Delhi, India, 1-12.

      18. BIS, I. (1978). 9013-1978 Specification for method of curing of concrete.

      19. Standard, I. (1988). Methods of physical tests for hydraulic cement. Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS), New Delhi, India, IS, 4031-1988.