- Open Access
- Total Downloads : 806
- Authors : Gita R. Rohit, Dipak C. Gosai
- Paper ID : IJERTV2IS4305
- Volume & Issue : Volume 02, Issue 04 (April 2013)
- Published (First Online): 16-04-2013
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Effect of Percentage of Coolant and Water Mixture for Cooling In Automobile Radiator Using CFD Analysis.
Gita R. Rohit
Post Graduate Student, Mechanical Engineering Department,
Shri Sad Vidmandal Institute of Engg. & Technology, Bharuch
Dipak C. Gosai
Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department, Shri Sad Vidmandal Institute of Engg. &
Technology, Bharuch
ABSTRACT
The thermal performance of an automotive radiator plays an important role in the performance of an automobiles cooling system and all other associated systems. For a number of years, this component has suffered from little attention with very little changing in its manufacturing cost, operation and geometry. As opposed to the old tubular heat exchangers currently form the backbone of todays process industry with their advanced performance reading levels tubular heat exchangers can only dream of. In this Paper, we perform first solid modeling of radiator in Solid works and then this solid model is transferred to ANSYS Workbench mesh module for meshing. After completing meshing, this meshed model is transferred to ANSYS CFX for CFD Analysis. Once CFD Analysis is complied with ANSYS CFX. We would be able to find all flow parameters like heat transfer rate, temperature contour etc. After getting CFD Result and experimental data we can say that both results are nearest result. So, after analysis says that Percentage of Ethylonal Glycol increases as a coolant temperature is decreased.
KEY WORDS: Radiator, temperature, Domain, Ethanol, Coolant.
INTRODUCTION ABOUT CFD
The equations of fluid mechanics which have been known for over a century are solvable only for a
limited no. of flows. The known solutions are extremely useful in understanding fluid flow but rarely used directly in engg analysis or design. CFD makes it possible to evaluate velocity, pressure, temperature, and species concentration of fluid flow throughout a solution domain, allowing the design to be optimized prior to the prototype phase.
Availability of fast and digital computer makes techniques popular among engineering community. Solutions of the equations of fluid mechanics on computer has become so important that it now occupies the attention of a perhaps a third of all researchers in fluid mechanics and the proportion is still is increasing. This field is known as computational fluid dynamics. At the core of the CFD modeling is a three-dimensional flow solver that is powerful, efficient, and easily extended to custom engineering applications. In designing a new mixing device, injection grid or just a simple gas diverter or a distribution device, design engineers need to ensure adequate geometry, pressure loss, and residence time would be available. More importantly, to run the plant efficiently and economically, operators and plant engineers need to know and be able to set the optimum parameters.
Fig:1 CFD Procedures steps chart
PROCEDURE OF CFD ANALYSIS FOR RADIATOR
Technical Specification and Dimensional Details
Radiator is considered as a Shell and Tube Type Heat Exchanger.
Overall Dimensional Drawing of Experimental Radiator.
Fig:2 Overall Dimensions of Radiator
Shell Side Data:- Media:- Air Temperature:- 35°C
Inlet Velocity: – 30 Kmph (Vehicle Speed) Outlet Pressure:- 1.01325 bar
Tube Side Data:- Diameter of Tube:- 7 mm No. of Tubes:- 29
Media:- Water + Ethanol(50%) Temperature (Engine) :- 95 °C Inlet Velocity: – 2m/s
Outlet Pressure:- 1.01325 bar Define Porous Domain for Fins. Domain Type: – Porous
Domain Material: – Air Ideal Gas Domain Motion: – Stationary Volume Porosity: – 0.8
Fig:3 Meshed Radiator
Define Porous Domain for Fins. Domain Type: – Porous
Domain Material: – Air Ideal Gas Domain Motion: – Stationary Volume Porosity: – 0.8
Fig:4 (Domain -1 Porus domain)
Define Domain for Water + Ethanol. Domain Type:- Fluid
Domain Material: – Water + Ethanol Domain Motion:- Stationary
Fig:5(Domain -2 Water+Ethonal)
Result Analysis
Fig:6 Result Analysis
EXPERIMENTAL DATA
Experimental Results
Shell Side inlet temperature-35
SR No. |
Velocity of Car m/s |
Tube Side Outlet Temperature (Experimental) |
Shell Side Outlet temperature (Experimental) |
1 |
13.88 |
79.12 |
63.52 |
2 |
8.33 |
77.12 |
61.25 |
SR No. |
Velocity of Car m/s |
Tube Side Outlet Temperature (Experimental) |
Shell Side Outlet temperature (Experimental) |
1 |
13.88 |
79.12 |
63.52 |
2 |
8.33 |
77.12 |
61.25 |
Engine Temperature Tube Side Inlet-90 Case :1 Velocity of Car :50 Kmph=13.88m/s Case :2Velocity of Car:30 Kmph=8.33m/s
Case1 :Velocity 50 m/s Heat Transfer Calculation:- Surface Area of Shell is
A = h*l
= 0.36*0.61
=0.2196 m2
Mass Flow Rate is m = A * V *
= 0.2196 * 13.88 * 1.1
= 3.35 Kg/s Heat Transfer Rate is
Q = m * Cp * T
= 3.35 * 1.0044* (63.52-35)
= 98.20 W
Overall Heat transfer Co-efficient is
Q
U =
A (Toutlet Tmean )
98.20
=
0.2196 ( 63.52 35 )
= 15.8 W/ m2 K
Case 2: Velocity:30 m/s Heat Transfer Calculation:- Surface Area of Shell is
A = h*l
= 0.36*0.61
= 0.2196 m2
Mass Flow Rate is
m = A * V *
= 0.2196 * 8.33 * 1.1
= 2.0122 Kg/s
Heat Transfer Rate is Q = m * Cp * T
= 2.0122 * 1.0044* (61.25-35)
= 53.0527 W
Overall Heat transfer Co-efficient is
Outlet Pressure: – 1.03125bar Tube Side:-
Fluid:- Water + 70% Ethanol
Inlet Temperature: – 95°C Inlet Velocity: – 2 m/s
Outlet Pressure: – 1.01325 bar
Results of Modification 1
Q
U =
A (Toutlet Tmean )
53.05
=
0.2196 ( 61.25 35 )
=9.20 W/ m2 K
SR No. |
Velocity of Car m/s |
Heat Transfer Coefficient |
1 |
13.88 |
98.200179 |
2 |
8.33 |
53.0527 |
Table 1 Experimental result table (Heat transfer co-efficient)
EFFECT OF RADIATOR TUBE SIDE FLUID ON RADIATOR PERFORMANCE
Modification 1 Shell Side:- Fluid:- Air
Inlet Temperature: – 35°C Inlet Velocity: – 30 Kmph
Modification 2
Fluid: (Water + 50% Ethanol) Results of Modification 2
Modification 3
Fluid:- Water + 30% Ethanol Results of Modification 3
RESULT ANALYSIS
Comparison of Experimental Results with CFD Analysis Results:-
Sr No. |
Experimental Results |
CFD Analysis Results |
% Variation |
1 |
77.12 |
78.3 |
1.18 |
Table 2 Result comparison table
CONCLUSION
-
CFD Analysis Results Fairly matches with the experimental Results which show that CFD Analysis is a good tool for avoiding costly and time consuming experimental work.
-
Through experimental data that increases velocity ,heat transfers lso increases.
-
Percentage of Ethylonal Glycol increases as a coolant temperature is decreased.
REFERENCES
-
Salvio Chako,Dr.Biswadip Shome and Vinod Kumar Numerical Simulation For Improving Radiator Efficiency, Engineering Automation Group, Tata Technologies Limited, Engineering research Center, Tata Motors Limited, India, 2003.
-
Mohd Yusoff Sulaiman, Shamsul Bahari Azraai, Wan Mokhtar CFD Modelling of Air Flow Distribution from a Fan, University Teknical Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia, 2009.
-
A.Witry, M.H. Al-Hajeri and Ali A. Bondac, 2003, CFD analysis of fluid flow and heat transfer in patterned roll bonded aluminium radiator, 3rd International conference on CFD, CSIRO, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 12-19.
-
S.N Sridhara,S.R.Shankalp and V.Umesh Babu CFD Analysis of fluid flow and heat transfer in a single tube-fin arrangement of an automotive Radiator International Conference on Mechanical Engineering 2005(ICME2005)28- 30December 2005,Dhaka,Bangladesh.
-
5 C. Oliet, A.Oliva,J.Castro, Parametric studies on automotive radiators
Applied Thermal Engineering 27 (2007) 20332043.