DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS70658
- Open Access
- Total Downloads : 1310
- Authors : Sharad P. Desai, Swapnil B. Cholekar
- Paper ID : IJERTV2IS70658
- Volume & Issue : Volume 02, Issue 07 (July 2013)
- Published (First Online): 22-07-2013
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Seismic Behaviour Of Flat Slab Framed Structure With And Without Masonry Infill Wall
Sharad P. Desai [1], Swapnil B. Cholekar [2]
1-Post Graduate Student, Department of Civil Engineering, KLEMSSCET, Belgaum,
Karnataka, India, 590008
2-Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, KLEMSSCET, Belgaum, Karnataka, India, 590008
Abstract
In general normal frame construction utilizes columns, slabs & beams. However it may be possible to undertake construction without providing beams, in such a case the frame system would consist of slab and column without beams. These types of slabs are called Flat slab, since their behavior resembles the bending of at plates. These slab are directly rests on column and the load from the slabs is directly transferred to the columns and then to the foundation. Drops or columns are generally provided with column heads or capitals. The main aim of the project is to determine the Dynamic response of Flat slab with drop and without drop and Conventional Reinforced Concrete Framed Structures for different height with and without masonry infill wall.
KeywordsFlat slab with drop, Flat slab without drop, conventional building, storey drift, STAAD PRO.
-
Introduction
Reinforced concrete has been used for building construction since the middle of the 19th century, first for some parts of buildings, and then for the entire building structure. Reinforced concrete is a major construction material for civil infrastructure in current society. Construction has always preceded the development of structural design methodology. Dramatic collapse of buildings has been observed after each disastrous earthquake, resulting in loss of life.
A flat slab is a typical type of construction in which a reinforced slab is built monolithically with the supporting columns and is reinforced in two or more directions, without any provision of beams. The flat slab thus transfers the load directly to the supporting columns suitably spaced below the slab. The flat slab is often thickened closed to supporting columns to provide adequate strength in shear and to reduce the amount of negative reinforcement in the support regions. The thickened portion i.e. the projection below the slab is called drop or drop panel. The perimeter of the critical section, for shear and hence, increasing the capacity of the slab for resisting two-way shear and to reduce negative bending moment at the support.
-
Details of the Structure
-
Modelling and Analysis
The main objective of the analysis is to study the different forces acting on a building. The analysis is carried out in STAAD Pro V8i software. Results of conventional building, flat slab with drop and flat slab without drop for different heights with and without masonry infill wall are discussed below. Conventional building, flat slab with drop and flat slab without drop different height are modelled and analyzed for the different combinations for Dynamic loading. The comparison is made between the Conventional buildings, flat slab with drop and flat slab without drop Buildings with and without masonry infill wall is situated in seismic zone III.
-
Assumptions
The following are the assumptions made:
The heights of the buildings are kept as 17.5 m, 25 m and
32.5 m, from ground these buildings are of 5 storeys, 7 storeys and 9 storeys, respectively. The height of one floor is of 3.6m each. In this way the 9 number of total modal are analyzed.
-
Group Properties
The different components of Conventional Building are as follows.
Columns of the building is of 600mm x 600mm Beam size of the building is of 230mm x 600mm Slab thickness of the building is of 150mm
Similarly the different components of Flat slab with drop and without drop are as follows.
Columns of the building is of 600mm x 600mm
Slab thickness of the Flat slab without drop building is of 200mm.
Size of Drop in 300mm. Wall thickness of 230mm.
Material properties : M25
Ec = 5000 fck
-
Data for Infilled Frame
Infill properties
Elastic modulus of masonry wall (Em) = 13800 N/mm2
Thickness of the infill wall (t) = 230 mm Height of the infill wall (h) = 3000 mm Length of the infill wall (L) = 4400 mm Ic = 5.20×109 mm4
Ib = 4.14 x109mm4
= tan-1 (h/L)
= tan-1[3000/4000]
= 34.28
=1.124m
= 1.656m
=1.01m
Figure 2.1 Plan of building
Figure 2.2 Model of Conventional building without Masonry Infill Wall
Figure 2.3 Model of Flat Slab building without Masonry Infill Wall
Figure 2.4 Model of Conventional building with Masonry Infill Wall
Figure 2.5 Model of Flat Slab building with Masonry Infill Wall
-
-
Description for Loading
The loading on the buildings is considered as per following calculations
-
Dead Loads
-
Wall load with 230mm thickness = 13.8kN /m.
-
Wall load with 230mm thickness
for parapet = 6.9 kN /m.
-
Floor finish : 1.5kN/m²
-
Self weight of building is automatically considered by the STAAD Pro V8i software.
-
-
Live Loads : 4.0kN/m² at typical floor
: 1.5kN/m² on terrace
-
Earthquake Forces Data
Earthquake load for the building has been calculated as per IS-1893-2002:
-
Zone (Z) = III
-
Response Reduction Factor ( RF ) = 3
-
Importance Factor ( I ) = 1.5
-
Rock and soil site factor ( SS ) = 1
-
Type of Structures = 1
-
Damping Ratio ( DM ) = 0.05
-
-
Results and Discussions
Dynamic analysis for different types of building is done by using Response Spectrum method for earthquake zone III as per Indian Standard code. The effect of Flat slab with drop and Flat slab without drop considering with and without masonry infill wall is evaluated. In the present work significant change in the seismic parameters such as Fundamental Natural Period, Design Base Shear, Displacement and Axial Force of the structure is noticed.
Table 4.1 Design base shear for different type of buildings.
Fig 4.1 Design base shear for different type of buildings without and with infill wall.
Table 4.2 Maximum Displacement for different type of buildings.
TYPE OF MODEL
SLAB WITHOUT INFILL WALL
SLAB WITH INFILL WALL
% VARIATION
5
STOREY
CONVENTIONALBUILDING
27.971
23.446
19.300
FLAT SLAB WITHOUT DROP
49.836
30.703
62.316
FLAT SLAB WITH DROP
41.918
25.645
63.455
7
STOREY
CONVENTIONALBUILDING
41.373
37.581
10.090
FLAT SLAB WITHOUT DROP
81.388
50.930
59.804
FLAT SLAB WITH DROP
66.883
41.552
60.962
9
STOREY
CONVENTIONALBUILDING
58.134
46.211
25.801
FLAT SLAB WITHOUT DROP
118.167
74.820
57.935
FLAT SLAB WITH DROP
81.381
59.985
35.669
SLAB
SLAB
TYPE OF MODEL
WITHOUT INFILL
WITH INFILL
% VARIATION
WALL
WALL
5 STOREY
CONVENTIONALBUILDING
2351.01
2415.43
2.74
FLAT SLAB WITHOUT DROP
2376.63
2441.27
2.72
FLAT SLAB WITH DROP
2535.11
2599.69
2.55
7 STOREY
CONVENTIONALBUILDING
2594.09
2659.89
2.54
FLAT SLAB WITHOUT DROP
2622.92
2694.67
2.74
FLAT SLAB WITH DROP
2799.15
2870.89
2.56
9 STOREY
CONVENTIONALBUILDING
2780.14
2857.09
2.77
FLAT SLAB WITHOUT DROP
2810.80
2887.71
2.74
FLAT SLAB WITH DROP
3000.67
3077.85
2.57
SLAB
SLAB
TYPE OF MODEL
WITHOUT INFILL
WITH INFILL
% VARIATION
WALL
WALL
5 STOREY
CONVENTIONALBUILDING
2351.01
2415.43
2.74
FLAT SLAB WITHOUT DROP
2376.63
2441.27
2.72
FLAT SLAB WITH DROP
2535.11
2599.69
2.55
7 STOREY
CONVENTIONALBUILDING
2594.09
2659.89
2.54
FLAT SLAB WITHOUT DROP
2622.92
2694.67
2.74
FLAT SLAB WITH DROP
2799.15
2870.89
2.56
9 STOREY
CONVENTIONALBUILDING
2780.14
2857.09
2.77
FLAT SLAB WITHOUT DROP
2810.80
2887.71
2.74
FLAT SLAB WITH DROP
3000.67
3077.85
2.57
Fig 4.2 Maximum Displacement for different type of buildings without and with infill wall.
Table 4.3 Fundamental Natural Period for different type of buildings.
SLAB
SLAB
TYPE OF MODEL
WITHOUT INFILL
WITH INFILL
% VARIATION
WALL
WALL
5 STOREY
CONVENTIONALBUILDING
0.870
0.759
14.63
FLAT SLAB WITHOUT DROP
1.134
0.920
23.28
FLAT SLAB WITH DROP
1.016
0.856
18.69
7 STOREY
CONVENTIONALBUILDING
1.216
1.065
14.22
FLAT SLAB WITHOUT DROP
1.644
1.273
29.16
FLAT SLAB WITH DROP
1.432
1.210
18.37
9 STOREY
CONVENTIONALBUILDING
1.567
1.382
13.39
FLAT SLAB WITHOUT DROP
2.183
1.731
26.14
FLAT SLAB WITH DROP
1.812
1.573
15.16
Fig 4.3 Fundamental Natural Period for different type of buildings without and with infill wall.
Table 4.4 Maximum Axial Force for different type of buildings.
TYPE OF MODEL
SLAB WITHOUT INFILL WALL
SLAB WITH INFILL WALL
% VARIATION
5
STOREY
CONVENTIONALBUILDING
2274.06
2767.21
21.69
FLAT SLAB WITHOUT DROP
2411.60
2797.92
16.02
FLAT SLAB WITH DROP
2623.93
2669.15
1.72
7
STOREY
CONVENTIONALBUILDING
3128.41
3676.00
17.50
FLAT SLAB WITHOUT DROP
3361.54
3939.00
17.18
FLAT SLAB WITH DROP
3624.22
3754.71
3.60
9
STOREY
CONVENTIONALBUILDING
4012.07
4297.00
7.10
FLAT SLAB WITHOUT DROP
4256.64
5315.00
24.86
FLAT SLAB WITH DROP
4529.45
4815.00
6.30
Fig 4.4 Maximum Axial Force for different type of buildings without and with infill wall.
-
Conclusions
-
The Displacement value of Flat slab without Drop buildings is about 63% higher compared Conventional R.C.C building and 19% higher compared to Flat slab with Drop Building.
-
The Fundamental Natural Period increases as the number of stories increases, irrespective of type of building viz. conventional structure. The Fundamental Natural Period value is much higher in Flat Slab without
Drop Buildings Compared to Flat slab with Drop and Conventional R.C.C building.
-
For all the structure, Design base shear increases as the number of stories increases. This increase in design base shear is gradual up to 9th storey, thereafter, it increases significantly gives rise to further investigation on the topic. Design base shear of Conventional R.C.C building is less than the flat slab building.
-
The Axial Force value of Flat slab with Drop is greater than that of Flat Slab without drop and conventional R.C.C building.
-
The Displacement and Fundamental Natural Period value of the buildings with masonry infill wall is lesser compared to without masonry infill wall.
-
The Axial Force and Design Base Shear value of the buildings with masonry infill wall is lesser compared to without masonry infill wall.
-
References
-
K S Sable, V A Ghodechor, S B Kandekar, Comparative Study of Seismic Behavior of Multistory Flat Slab and Conventional Reinforced Concrete Framed Structures International Journal of Computer Technology and Electronics Engineering (IJCTEE)Volume 2, Issue 3, June 2012 .
-
Uttamasha Gupta, Shruti Ratnaparkhe, Padma Gome, Seismic Behavior of Buildings Having Flat Slabs with Drops International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering ISSN 2250-2459, Volume 2, Issue 10, October 2012.
-
Haroon Rasheed Tamboli and Umesh .N.Karadi, Seismic Analysis of RC Frame Structure with and without Masonry Infill Walls Indian Journal of Natural Sciences ISSN: 0976 0997, Vol.3 / Issue 14/ October2012.
-
Achintya, P. ayaratnam and S.K.Jain, Behavior of brick infilled R.C frame under lateral Load, The Indian Concrete Journal, Sept.1991, pp 453-457.
-
Ghassan Al Chaar, Mohsen Issa and Steve Sweeney, Behavior of Masonry infilled nondutile reinforced concrete frames, Journal of the Structural Engineering, Aug 2002,pp 1055-1063.
-
Mulgund G. V and Kulkarni A. B, Seismic Assessment Of R.C Frame Buildings With Brick Masonry Infills International Journal Of Advanced Engineering Sciences And Technologies Vol No. 2, Issue No. 2, 140 147.
-
IS: 1893-2002, Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant design of Structures Part 1- General provisions and buildings,(Fifth Revision), Bureau of Indian standards, New Delhi, June 2002.
-
IS: 456:2000, Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete, Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi, India.
-