Improving Electric Power Quality In Nigerian Existing 330kv 28 Bus Electric Power Systems Using Static Var Compensator System

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS80336

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Improving Electric Power Quality In Nigerian Existing 330kv 28 Bus Electric Power Systems Using Static Var Compensator System

Obi, Patrick I., Ulasi, John A., Offor, Kennedy J., Chidolue, G. C.

Department of Electrical/Electronic Engineering, Anambra State University, Uli, Nigeria

Abstract

The work involved the need to, in the interim, improve on the quality of electric supply in the country by compensating the existing 28 bus Nigerian network using Static Var Compensators. This is in contrast to the long term measures of increasing the power generation capacity and expanding our transmission and distribution networks. Electrical energy is a product and like any other product, should satisfy the proper quality requirements. Nigeria as a developing country needs quality electric supply to satisfy the social, economic and technical needs of the country. But the quality of electric supply generation to satisfy these needs leaves much to be desired. This paper examined the quality of electric supply in Nigeria and proffered modern methods to improve on the quality using FACTS devices.

Key Words: Compensation, FACTS,Violation, Existing, Quality.

  1. Introduction

    The importance of electricity cannot be compared with any other utility supply since it controls, determines and affects all other sectors of a nations economic development. The national gross domestic product (NGDP) is seriously dependent on the quality of electric supply of a particular nation. Our ever growing technological world has become deeply dependent upon the continuous availability of electrical power [1]. Increases in electric usage are necessary and desirable since electrical services are essential for a nations improved standards of living. Electricity attracts attention because it brings infrastructural development to every nation and sound national development depends on adequate provision of quality, reliable, efficient and affordable electricity [2]. President Goodluck Jonathan announced plans to develop the countrys economy that include investing up to 2013 into alternative energy and power generation, transmission and distribution to raise current output. One of the objectives of the First National Implementation Plan for Vision 2020 is to reduce the 40 per cent of Nigerians that lack access to electricity. The successes of this aim will be achieved by the robustness of the infrastructural development of the NIPP [3].

    Reliable and efficient electricity is a basic necessity and an essential intermediate input for social and economic development. Intelligent technology demands power that is free of interruption or disturbance [1]. It is essential for production of goods and services; security; leisure; and entertainment as well as the operation of modern technological systems. Availability and access to reliable and efficient electricity contribute to the growth of the economy and improvement in the standard of living of a people. Therefore, a precondition for Nigeria to achieve its aspiration of being one of the 20 biggest economies in 2020 is to generate, transmit and distribute adequate, reliable, efficient, and affordable electricity.

    The electric power situation in Nigeria is so inadequate that it has held back economic development and social well-being. This has constrained the developmental aspirations of Nigeria; low quality and unreliable electricity is often cited as the biggest bottleneck to business growth in Nigeria. The current generating capacity is less than 30 per cent [4] of the demand and the electricity supply system serves less than 40 per cent of the population, mainly in the urban areas. This inadequacy subjects Nigerians mainly in rural areas to unreliable power supply and unscheduled power outages. Studies [4, 5] have revealed that electricity challenges in Nigeria is beyond generation, the electricity supply industry faces equally transmission and distribution challenges.

    Nigeria needs to aggressively pursue measures that will, in the interim, avoid power system collapse and improve the integrity of the National Grid. Power generation projects generally take three to five years to complete depending on the size of the generation. The country cannot afford to wait that long for some kind of stability in their power supply [6] hence the decision to effectively and efficiently compensate the existing 330kV 28 Bus Electric network using Static Var System.

  2. Components of Electric Power

    Electric power generation, transmission and distribution have various parameters/components by which it is described. These include the following.

    1. Frequency

      Frequency correction is one of the most critical points in power system researches. Quick response to the frequency correction within the power plant is an important issue since it prevents damages to the power transmission lines, equipment and household appliances [7]. In a power grid system, load frequency control (LFC) plays an essential role. It provides better condition for power exchange and supply in trading electricity [8]. Delay in such systems could reduce system performance and even cause frequency or other parameter instability within the grid system.

    2. Power Factor:

      Power factor is a necessary ingredient of power quality, its correction/control is to reduce the harmonics in the line current, increase the efficiency and capacity of power systems and reduce customers utility bill [9, 10]. Power factor (PF) is defined as the ratio of the real power (P) to apparent power (S) or cosine (for pure sine wave for both current and voltage) the phase angle between the current and voltage wave forms.

      =

    3. Power:

      Real power in watts does the real work while the reactive power is the power required to generate the magnetic fields to enable the actual work to be done where as the apparent power is the total power that the utility company supplies normally in MVA.

    4. Voltage and Current:

      Current and Voltage are two fundamental quantities in electricity. Voltage is the cause and current is the effect [11]. Voltage is the electrical force that drives an electric current between two points while current is the rate at which electric charge flows past a point in a circuit. There are different types of voltages thus: direct voltage and alternating voltage. The different types of voltages have corresponding types of current direct current (DC) and alternating current (AC) respectively. The voltage in electric power transmission lines used to distribute electricity from power stations can be in several hundred times greater than the consumer voltages.

      Basic Standard Values in Nigerian Power generation, transmission and distribution system:

      The allowed transmission system performance characteristics are shown in table 1

      Table 1: Basic Standard Values;

      Normal

      Tolerable Range

      1

      Frequency

      50Hz

      48.75 51.25Hz

      2

      Voltage

      330Kv

      313.5 (0.95pu)

      346.5 (1.05pu)

      3

      Power factor

      0.85

      Power Quality Disturbance: This is generally defined as any change in power (voltage, current or frequency) that interferes with the normal operation of electrical equipment [12]. These disturbances include; (i) Transients (ii) Interruptions (iii) Sag/Under Voltage (iv) Swell/Over Voltage, (v) Waveform distortion, (vi) Voltae Fluctuations and

      (vii) Frequency Fluctuations. The origin of most of these power disturbances starts in the lengthy grid. The long kilometer grids are most times subjected to hash weather conditions such as lighting, wind, storms, traffic accidents, equipment failure and major switching operations. The study of the power quality and ways to control them has become very necessary because of the increase in the use of electronic gadget in almost all spheres of human endeavor.

  3. Simulation Model

    Figure 1 shows the modelled Nigerian existing 28bus 330kV Transmission line [13]. It is made up of the following:

    Capacity of 330/132kV (MVA) 3731

    Number of 330kV Substations 19

    Total number of 330kV Circuits 49

    Length of 330kV lines (km) 4,800

    Number of Control centres 1

    Number of transmission lines 32

    Number of buses 28

    Number of Generating Stations 10

    Fig. 1 Nigerian 28 bus Grid System

  4. Results of Simulations at 3731MW Generation Levels

    Table 2 and fig 1 show the voltage profile at each bus after the power flow analysis with generation standing at 3731MW. Details further show that there are voltage violations at bus 6 (Jos), bus 9 (Gombe), and bus 17 (Kano). These violations can be remedied using suitable voltage controlled devices such as voltage condensers (SVC). There is only one recorded thermal violation recorded on the line linking Kainji to Jebba transmission station.

    Table 2: Voltage profile after the Simulation at 3731MW level.

    Bus No

    Bus name

    Voltage (pu)

    1

    Kainji

    1.05

    2

    Oshogbo

    1.03

    3

    Benin

    1.02

    4

    Ikeja west

    1.00

    5

    Aiyede

    1.00

    6

    Jos

    0.91

    7

    Onitsha

    1.00

    8

    Akangba

    0.99

    9

    Gombe

    0.84

    10

    Abuja

    1.02

    11

    Egbin ps

    1.02

    12

    Delta ps

    1.05

    13

    AES

    1.00

    14

    Okpai

    1.00

    Bus No

    Bus name

    Voltage (pu)

    15

    Calabar

    1.00

    16

    Aladja

    1.04

    17

    Kano

    0.87

    18

    Sapele ps

    1.02

    19

    Aja

    1.02

    20

    Ajaokuta

    1.03

    21

    New haven

    0.96

    22

    Alaoji

    0.99

    23

    Afam gs

    1.00

    24

    Jebba tx

    1.05

    25

    Jebba ps

    1.05

    26

    Birinin keba

    1.05

    27

    Shiroro

    1.05

    28

    Kaduna

    0.99

    Fig 2 Bar Chart showing Voltage profile before Compensation.

    1. Reactive Power Compensation in Nigeria 330kV 28 Bus Electric Power System Network.

      System voltage depends mostly on the flow of reactive power. The long transmission lines in the Nigerian power system network generate considerable reactive Mvars which constitute serious problem in maintaining system voltages within statutory operating limits especially, during light loads periods and system disturbance. The existing 28 bus network has many reactors installed in the various locations in the power network in the country. These were taken into consideration in the simulations carried out to investigate the load flow. The status or location and values of the reactors are shown in table 3.

      Table 3: Status of reactors in the existing Nigerian 330kV network.

      POWER STATION

      kV RATING

      MVar RATING

      REMARK

      Kaduna

      330

      75

      Good

      Jebba

      330

      75

      Good

      Kano

      330

      75

      Good

      Gombe

      330

      50

      Good

      Oshogbo

      330

      75

      Good

      Benin

      330

      75

      Good

      Ikeja- west

      330

      75

      Good

      Source: [14].

      Normally compensation modifies the surge impedance by modifying both capacitive and /or inductive reactance of the line so as to produce virtual surge impedance loading that will always equal to the actual power being transmitted. Reactive power equipment is an essential component of the transmission system [15]. It is usually used for voltage regulation, stability enhancement and for increasing power transfer. Voltage profile and stability of power transmission lines can be improved by using reactive compensation. Conventional compensation used in Nigeria 330kV network is fixed value reactors and capacitors normally controlled by mechanical switchgears. In some areas where it was very necessary to vary reactive power continuously, large generators and synchronous condensers were employed. Recently, power engineers employ latest technology known as Flexible Alternating Current Transmission System (FACTS). Flexible Alternating Current Transmission System are new devices emanating from recent innovative technologies that are capable of altering voltage phase angle and /or impedance at particular points in power systems [16].

    2. Modeling of Static Var Systems

      A static Var System (SVS) (fig 3) is an aggregation of static Var Compensators SVCs and mechanically switched capacitors (MSCs) or mechanically switched reactors (MSRs) where outputs are properly coordinated [17 19]. Static Var

      Compensators are shunt-connected static generators and absorbers whose outputs are varied in order to control specific parameters of the electric power system. SVCs are unlike synchronous Compensators. They have no moving or rotating main components hence, a SVC comprises static Var generator (SVG) or absorber devices and a suitable control device. Since SVCs have the ability to provide continuous and rapid control of reactive power and voltage, SVCs can enhance several aspect of transmission system performance and their application to date include the following;

      • Control of temporary (power frequency) over voltages

      • Prevention of voltage collapse

      • Enhancement of transient stability

      • Enhancement of damping of system oscillations.

        Fig 3. Schematic diagram of a typical SVS

        SVS consists of a Thyristor Controlled Reactor (TCR) and switched (thyristor or mechanical capacitors(S).

        In modeling of static Var compensators, it is assumed that BSVC be the shunt susceptance of the SVC corresponding to the Mvar loading of it. This susceptance is then added to the susceptance at the particular bus. The total susceptance is given by B, a reduction in the controlling voltage V will cause the desired susceptance B to increase; this increase caues Mvar output of SVC to be enhanced. The SVC injected current into the bus is given by

        (1)

        where,

        ( 2)

        G maybe assumed to be zero then the MVA output of the SVC is given by

        (3)

        Table 5 Values of reactors used in the modeling and simulation of compensated 28bus 330kV Nigerian Existing power system.

        POWER STATION

        RATING

        STATION

        BUS NO.

        Kv

        MVar

        Jebba

        25

        330

        75

        Oshogbo

        2

        330

        75

        Ikeja- West

        4

        330

        75

        Benin

        3

        330

        75

        Onitsha

        7

        330

        30

        Aiyede

        5

        330

        75

        Akangba

        8

        330

        75

        New Haven

        21

        330

        30

        Alaoji

        22

        330

        30

        Kaduna

        28

        330

        75

        Kano

        17

        330

        75

        Gombe

        9

        330

        100

        Jos

        6

        330

        30

        Birini Kebbi

        26

        330

        30

        Ajaokuta

        20

        330

        30

        Improvement in the quality of power generated in the system as a result of the compensation of the existing 28bus 330kV Nigeria power network can be seen in the result as stated in table 7 and fig. 4. The values of reactive power injected to the respective buses to achieve this compensation are as shown in Table 6 and the compensated model is shown in fig. 5

        Table 6 Values of the new incorporated Static Vars compensators (SVC)

    3. Results on Incorporation of Static Var Compensator (SVC) on the Existing 28 Bus Nigerian Power System Network.

      Results obtained from the power flow studies employing N-R algorithm exposed weak buses, heavily loaded transmission lines and phase angles. On incorporation of a suitable compensatory device STATIC VAR COMPENSATOR on some buses including existing ones, the hitherto weak buses were compensated. Table 6 shows the incorporation of SVC on Aiyede, Akangba, New Heaven, Alaoji, Kaduna, Kano, Gombe, Jos, Birini- Kebbi and Ajaokuta buses. The eventual results are shown clearly on fig 4 and table 7 and all the weak buses complied with statutory range of ±5% of base voltage of 330kV.

      Bus No

      Bus Name

      Voltage (pu)

      1

      Kainji

      1.0295

      2

      Oshogbo

      1.0101

      3

      Benin

      1.0102

      4

      Ikeja- West

      0.9990

      5

      Aiyede

      1.0100

      6

      Jos

      0.9654

      7

      Onitsha

      0.9901

      8

      Akangba

      0.9999

      9

      Gombe

      1.0063

      10

      Abuja

      1.0261

      11

      Egbin Ps

      1.0206

      12

      Delta ps

      1.0301

      13

      AES

      1.0000

      14

      Okpai

      1.0082

      15

      Calabar

      1.0000

      16

      Aladja

      1.0276

      17

      Kano

      1.0086

      18

      Sapele ps

      1.0098

      19

      Aja

      1.0302

      20

      Ajaokuta

      1.0274

      21

      New Haven

      0.9905

      22

      Alaoji

      1.0000

      23

      Afam ps

      0.9906

      24

      Jebba Tx

      1.0236

      25

      Jebba Ps

      1.0202

      26

      BiruninKebe

      1.0222

      27

      Shiroro

      1.0231

      28

      Kaduna

      1.0041

      Bus No

      Bus Name

      Voltage (pu)

      1

      Kainji

      1.0295

      2

      Oshogbo

      1.0101

      3

      Benin

      1.0102

      4

      Ikeja- West

      0.9990

      5

      Aiyede

      1.0100

      6

      Jos

      0.9654

      7

      Onitsha

      0.9901

      8

      Akangba

      0.9999

      9

      Gombe

      1.0063

      10

      Abuja

      1.0261

      11

      Egbin Ps

      1.0206

      12

      Delta ps

      1.0301

      13

      AES

      1.0000

      14

      Okpai

      1.0082

      15

      Calabar

      1.0000

      16

      Aladja

      1.0276

      17

      Kano

      1.0086

      18

      Sapele ps

      1.0098

      19

      Aja

      1.0302

      20

      Ajaokuta

      1.0274

      21

      New Haven

      0.9905

      22

      Alaoji

      1.0000

      23

      Afam ps

      0.9906

      24

      Jebba Tx

      1.0236

      25

      Jebba Ps

      1.0202

      26

      BiruninKebe

      1.0222

      27

      Shiroro

      1.0231

      28

      Kaduna

      1.0041

      Table 7 Bus Voltages after compensation.

      POWER STATION

      RATING

      POWER STATION

      RATING

      STATI ON

      BU S NO

      .

      kV

      M

      Va r

      STATI ON

      BU S NO.

      kV

      M

      Var

      Jebba

      25

      330

      75

      New Haven

      21

      330

      30

      Oshogb o

      2

      330

      75

      Alaoji

      22

      330

      30

      Ikeja- West

      4

      330

      75

      Kaduna

      28

      330

      75

      Benin

      3

      330

      75

      Kano

      17

      330

      75

      Onitsha

      7

      330

      30

      Gombe

      9

      330

      100

      Aiyede

      5

      330

      75

      Jos

      6

      330

      30

      Akangb a

      8

      330

      75

      Birini Kebbi

      26

      330

      30

      Ajaokut a

      20

      330

      30

      Fig. 4 Plot of voltage profile after compensation of the 28 bus Nigerian network

      Fig 5. Model of the Compensated 28bus 330kV Nigeria Power Network (Grid)

      Note: The dots (.) indicate compensated buses.

  5. Discussion

    Power flow results of the existing 28 bus power network was carried out employing Newton-

    Raphson power flow algorithm written in MATLAB language using the transmission line and bus parameters as obtained from the Power Holding Company Nigeria (PHCN) logbooks as shown in Appendixes 1 and 2.

    It was clearly seen that some buses violated the statutory limits of voltage which has corresponding effects on the other components of power quality like the power factor and frequency. The affected buses are; bus 6 (Jos) (0.91 pu), bus 9 {Gombe) (0.84pu) and bus 17 (Kano) (0.87pu). On application of Static Var Compensators at various buses in the network, the defaulting buses maintained a voltage within the statutory limit, bus 6 (Jos) (0.9654pu), bus 9 (Gombe) (1.0063pu), bus 17 (Kano) (1.0086pu).

  6. Conclusion/Recommendation

The 28bus Nigerian 330kV Power network has very low voltage drop in some buses namely Jos, Gombe, and Kano before the line was adequately compensated employing Static Var Compensators (SVC). There was a serious improvement in the voltage profile of the network after compensation. This compensation will enable the existing 28bus 330kV transmission network to be effectively used close to its thermal limit, yet it remains stable, reduce transmission line losses and maintain grid stability. It is therefore recommended that for Nigeria to attain the status of industrialized nation, aggressive steps must be taken to reform the power sector with a view to improving the electric power quality, since a stable power sector is a necessary factor for industrialization in any economy.

References

[1]. Joseph Seymor- The seven types of power problem http://www.eepublishers.co.2a/images/uploads/eng-

[2]. Jonathan Okonkwo the future of Nigeria Electricity daily times Oct 17th, 2011 dialytimes.com.ng/blog/future-nigerias electricity.

[3]. Eze Onyekwere- Power: lets speed up reforms

Punch news paper June 16th, 2012

[4]. Obi, P.I, and Offor, K. J, Power Flow and Contingency Assessment of the Existing 330kV Nigeria Power Grid to cope with the proposed increase in power generation in 2014 International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (IJERT) Vol. 1 Issue 4, 2012.

[5]. C.C. Okoro and K.C. Achugbu, Contingency Assessment of the Nigerian 330-kV Power Grid, Proceedings of International Conference and Exhibition on Power Systems, University of Lagos, Nigeria, 23rd 25th July, 2007.

[6]. Emeka S. Ojukwu Emergency solution to power sector crisis in Nigeria nigeriaword.com/articles/2010/jul/022.html

[7]. Behnam J. $ Shahnam J Analysis on the application (2011) of PID Controller in the frequency contribution of gas turbine power plant international journal of physical sciences Vol. 6(19) pp4519 4527. http:// www.academic journals.org/IJPS

[8]. Sheldrake (2003) Handbook of electrical Engineering for practitioners in the oil, Gas and petrochemical Industry, John Wily $ Sons Ltd W. Sussex, England.

[9]. Compliance testing to the IEC 1000-3-2 (EN 61000-

3-2) AND IEC 1000-3-2 (EN 61000-3) Standards,

application note 1273, Hewlett Packard co., Dec 1995. [10]. H.Z Azazi, E.E.EL-Khonly, S.A Mohamound and

S.S. Shokralla Review of passive and Active circuits for power factor correction in single phase, low power AC. DC Converters. Proceedings of the 14th International Middle East power systems conference. (MEPCON10), Cairo University, Egypt Dec. 19-12, 2010 paper ID 154,

PP217-224.

[11]. Current vs Voltage. www.diffen.com

/difference/current_vs_voltage.

[12]. Alexis Polycarpou Power Quality and voltage sag indices in Electrical Power Systems www.intechopen.com 2011.

[13]. Power Holding Company of Nigeria (PHCN) National Control Center Oshogbo Generation and Transmission Grid Operations 2008,2009,2010 annual Technical

[14]. Caven B. A study of Voltage Profile in the NEPA network: Analysis and Recommendations Engineering Focus 1992.

[15]. Li, Zhang Sheng Reactive power control and Reactive power compensation www.biblio.com/reactive-power-control

[16]. Nwohu, M. N. Voltage Stability Improvement using Static Var Compensator in Power Systems Leonardo Journal of Sciences Issue 14 pp 167 172, 2009.

[17]. CIGRE: Report, Static Var Compensators Prepared by WG 38-01, Task force No. 2, Paris 1982. [18]. U. S. Department of Energy Report, Static Reactive Power Compensators for High Voltage Power Systems prepared by General Electric Company, DOE/NBM-1010, 1982.

[19]. IEEE Special Stability Controls Working Group Report, Static Var Compensators model for power flow and Dynamic Performance Simulation Paper 93WM173-5-PWRS, presented at IEEE PES Winter Meeting, Columbus, Ohio, 1993.

Leave a Reply