Environmental Impact Assessment of Thermal Power Plant in Singrauli

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS100040

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Environmental Impact Assessment of Thermal Power Plant in Singrauli

Environmental Impact Assessment of Thermal Power Plant in Singrauli

Gaurish Kumar Dubey .1, Rajesh Kumar Kaushal .2, Praveen Patel .3.

[ M.Tech. Industrial Safety Engineering, Department of Fire Technology and Safety Engineering, Institute of Engineering & Science IPS Academy, Indore,(M.P)]

ABSTRACT:-

It has been realized that thermal power plant has several primary as well as secondary environmental impacts on Singrauli for which assessment studies are necessary for mitigating the possible future impacts that a project might have on the environment. These studies enable the decision maker from the organization or government agencies to consider environmental impact due existing & upcoming project to take necessary steps to prevent adverse environmental impacts of existing and upcoming project.

Keywords: – coalmine, powerplant, environmental impact assessment (EIA),spm, rspm.

Sr.

No.

Param eter

Method

Instrument to be used

1

PM2.5

Gravimetri c Method

PM2.5 Sampler Model No. AAS 127(Make Ecotech)

2

PM10( RPM)

Gravimetri c Method

PM10 Sampler Model No. AAS 127(Make

Ecotech)/RDS )

3

SO2

IS 5182

Impinger Box attached with RDS/PM10 Sampler)

4

NOx

IS 5182

Impinger Box attached with RDS/PM10 Sampler)

Sr.

No.

Param eter

Method

Instrument to be used

1

PM2.5

Gravimetri c Method

PM2.5 Sampler Model No. AAS 127(Make Ecotech)

2

PM10( RPM)

Gravimetri c Method

PM10 Sampler Model No. AAS 127(Make

Ecotech)/RDS )

3

SO2

IS 5182

Impinger Box attached with RDS/PM10 Sampler)

4

NOx

IS 5182

Impinger Box attached with RDS/PM10 Sampler)

INTRODUCTION: Singrauli area consists of north east part of Singrauli district of Madhya Pradesh & southern part of Sonebhadra district of Uttar Pradesh. It is the 50th district of Madhya Pradesh which is disintegrated from Sidhi district on 24th May 2008. It is an emerging power hub of India due to availability of coal & water. N.C.L has ten working open cast coal mines which produced 70.021 million tonnes of coal during 2012-2013. N.C.L. has planned to reach 80 million tonnes by the year 2016-2017. Water Rihand dam has reservoir capacity of 129 million cubic meter & catchment are 5148km2.Dam & spill way. Dam height is 91meter & length 934meter. Because of these two factor that is availability of coal and water. Electricity is generated in the minimum cost.

Power Generating capacity of India is 211766.22 MW that is 100%, out of which 141713.6 MW that is 66.91% from thermal, 121610.88MW that 57.42% from coal based thermal power plant, 13732 MW from singrauli approximately 12 % of coal based thermal power plant. Near about 10000 MW under construction. Due to this much of power Generation in singrauli Lot of Air pollution occurs in the singrauli the main pollution content are SO2, NOx, PM10(RPM) & PM2.5 which are in very high Quantity and their chances to exceed beyond allowable limit .

1.

  1. PROPOSED MONITORING METHOD

    The focus in this study is to find out the ambient air quality in singrauli district at different location so we are able to

    identify actual pollution content in the Singrauli Region due to thermal power plant. The study mainly focus on content SO2, NOx, PM10(RPM) & PM2.5 while studying air pollution two more things mainly come into the picture that is mercury and ozone but we have not considered this in our study scope, environmental impact assessment due to thermal power plant in singrauli at 6 different location in Singrauli. The data presented in this paper were compiled as a part of a research project. Pollution that occurred at different stages in thermal power plant in the power generating industry at the industrial site. This statistics may serve as an important feedback instrument to monitor pollution extent in singrauli. Following are the method adopted to find out content of this four air pollution content and instrument used to find out the same also mention in the table given below.

    Parameter Location

    RPM (µg/m3)

    PM2.5 (µg/m3)

    SO2 (µg/m3)

    NOx (µg/m3 )

    Max.

    Min.

    Max.

    Min.

    Max.

    Min.

    Max.

    Min.

    Near Construction Office

    103.40

    83.20

    64.74

    49.20

    15.65

    12.10

    25.70

    21.81

    Permanent Store

    99.95

    86.72

    62.34

    47.70

    15.68

    13.40

    26.76

    20.95

    Sasan Village

    94.90

    82.67

    57.00

    39.25

    13.25

    10.50

    23.10

    21.34

    Sidhi Khurd

    97.23

    76.89

    55.62

    39.10

    15.63

    12.00

    26.38

    22.58

    Tiyara Viilage(Township)

    103.41

    86.06

    62.44

    48.93

    15.61

    12.93

    30.41

    25.00

    Harahawa Village

    77.50

    60.70

    49.20

    36.80

    13.59

    10.70

    21.30

    16.80

  2. ANALYSIS/CALCULATION

    120.00

    120.00

    100.00

    100.00

    80.00

    Near Construction Office

    80.00

    Near Construction Office

    60.00

    Permanent Store

    Sasan Village

    60.00

    Permanent Store

    Sasan Village

    40.00

    Sidhi Khurd

    Tiyara Viilage(Township)

    40.00

    Sidhi Khurd

    Tiyara Viilage(Township)

    20.00

    Harahawa Village

    20.00

    Harahawa Village

    0.00

    0.00

    Max.

    Min.

    Max.

    Min.

    Max.

    Min.

    Max.

    Min.

    Max.

    Min.

    Max.

    Min.

    Max.

    Min.

    Max.

    Min.

    RPM (µg/m3)

    PM2.5 (µg/m3)

    SO2 (µg/m3)

    NOx (µg/m3 )

    RPM (µg/m3)

    PM2.5 (µg/m3)

    SO2 (µg/m3)

    NOx (µg/m3 )

    Ambient Air Quality Standards as per Notification published on 18th November, 2009

    Ecology Sensitive Area (Notified by Central Govt.)

    S.No

    Pollutant

    Time Weighted Average

    Concentration in Ambient Air

    Industrial, Residential

    ,Rural and Other Area

    Method of Measurement

    1

    Sulphur Dioxide (SO2),(µg/m3 )

    Annual 24 Hours

    50

    80

    20

    80

    -Improved West and Geek

    -Ultraviolet fluoresce

    2

    Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2),(µg/m3 )

    Annual 24 Hours

    40

    80

    30

    80

    -Modified Jacob & Hochheiser(Na Arsenite) Chemiluminesceoce

    3

    Particulate Matter (PM10) RPM ,(µg/m3 )

    Annual 24 Hours

    60

    100

    60

    100

    Gravimetric TOEM Beta Attention

    4

    Particulate Matter (PM2.5)

    ,(µg/m3 )

    Annual 24 Hours

    40

    60

    40

    60

    Gravimetric TOEM Beta Attention

  3. CONCLUSION

This are the parameter which are fluctuating as the reading are taken when pollution control measures has been taken max so2 is 16 (µg/m3 ) While max allowable is 80 (µg/m3 ) . so2 is very less than

allowable limit. Max NOx is 31(µg/m3) while max

allowable is 80(µg/m3 ) . Particulate Matter Max (PM2.5) is 65(µg/m3 ) which is more than max allowable limit that is 60(µg/m3 ).Particulate Matter (PM10) Max RPM 103 (µg/m3) which is also more than maximum allowable limit that is 100(µg/m3).

As all the reading are taken away from the emission point of power plant .this show that emission is somehow more than allowable limit . when all the power plant which are in construction phase when they start their operation then this limit is easily exceeded. So we should take care of all such factors as well as take necessary preventive action to control this emission level .so as to minimize health problem due to this particles to human being nearby Singrauli.

REFERENCES

  1. Che Leia, Ding Fengb,Cui Weia,Zhang Ai-xina, Chen Zhen- hua The Application of Multidimensional Data Analysis in the EIA Database of Electric Industry.

  2. Saikiran Tharimena1, Heena Gampawar1, Katpatal,(2011), Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Based Studies of a Thermal Power Plant on the Hydrologic Regime Using Remote Sensing

  3. Md. J. B. Alam1, A. A. M. Ahmed2*, M. J. H. Khan and B. Ahmed,Evaluation of possible environmental impacts for Barapukuria thermal power plant and coal mine.

  4. Neeraj Kumar Sharma#, Soumik Mitra#, Vinit Sehgal#, Sumit Mishra, An Assessment of Physical Properties of Coal Combustion Residues w.r.to Their Utilization Aspects .

  5. Olushola S. Ayanda1*, Olalekan S. Fatoki1, Folahan A. Adekola2, And Bhekumusa J. Ximba1, Characterization of Fly Ash Generated from Matla Power Station in Mpumalanga, South Africa.

  6. C. Veraa,, M. Barangeb, O.P: Dubec, L. Goddardd, D. Griggse, N. Kobyshevaf, E. Odadag, S. Pareyh, J. Polovinai,

    G. Povedaj, B. Seguink and K. Trenberthl Needs Assessment for Climate Information on Decadal Timescales and Longer.

  7. Qiu Xiaoming*, Yang Jiasheng Government Role in the Coordinated Mechanism for River Basin Water Quality Control

  8. W. K. Pokale*,effects of thermal power plant on environment.

  9. Moti L. Mittal, Estimates of Emissions from Coal Fired Thermal Power Plants in India..

  10. Madhya Pradesh Pollution Control Board & Central Pollution Control Board.

Sites Referred: http://www.ieee.org www.sciencedirect.com www.elsevier.com

Leave a Reply