Designing A Station Pilot At Lagoon for Treatment of Wastewater

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS120540

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Designing A Station Pilot At Lagoon for Treatment of Wastewater

R. Cherouaki

Applied Chemistry and Environment Laboratory. University of Science and Technology Settat 577.

Morocco.

A.Achkoun, J.Naja, A.Lamiri,

Applied Chemistry and Environment Laboratory. University of Science and Technology Settat 577.

Morocco.

L. Eddeguesse

Technical Division, wilaya of chaouia- ouardigha

Abstract

This study involves the design and sizing of a pilot wastewater treatment plant for the treatment of wastewater from the town Oulad Said the region Chaouia Ouardigha [1]. The pilot plant designed for 10 Equivalent-Habitants, has been implemented based on the empirical formula of MARA [2]. It has three lagoon pools, an anaerobic pond, a facultative pond and a maturation pond. The result of reduction of the studied physico-chemical and bacteriological parameters indicates the well functioning of the optimized station.

Key words: wastewater, pilot station, impoundment, treatment.

  1. Introduction

    With water stress currently affecting the world in general and the arid and semi-arid areas in particular; treatment and recycling of wastewater by different techniques are an alternative option to the

    The study was carried out with a pilot who consists of three ponds covered with a geo- membrane to provide sealing [6]. The pilot is sized to 10 Eq/hab using the following areas: anaerobic pond S(a) = 0.80 m2, facultative pond S(f) = 11.24 m2 and maturation pond S(m) = 5.27m 2

    1. Results and discussion

      1. Results of physicochemical and bacteriological parameters

        Each pool was respectively supplied by a flow of wastewater of 753 liters / day for 32 days in accordance with the residence time in each tank.

        The results of analysis of the various physicochemical and bacteriological parameters are shown respectively in Tables 1 and 2.

        Table 1 : Abatement rate of physicochemical

        parameters

        possibility of availability of water resources. It is in

        this context that the present work is registered and

        Parameter Input to output of abatement%

        aims the treatment and reuse of wastewater from a pH

        7.27

        8.1

        – – –

        small town of 2500 people through the use of a Cl- (mg/l)

        885,123

        308,14

        65

        pilot lagoon and to the design of the treatment plant PO -2 (mg/l)

        8,73

        3,9

        55.3

        Mg+2, Ca+2 (mg/l)

        145,57

        25,2

        83.3

        SO -2 (mg/l)

        435,33

        72,038

        83.5

        NO – (mg/l)

        8,19

        2,39

        70.8

        + (mg/l) 9,994

        Determination and followed indicators pollution NH4

        49,6

        parameters was carried out in part by the extent of MES (mg/l)

        492,86

        126,5

        74.3

        microbiological parameters and secondly by Turbidity (NTU)

        302,57

        35,60

        88.2

        measuring the BOD5 (biochemical oxygen DCO (mg/l)

        demand), COD (chemical oxygen demand)

        792,3

        116,66

        85.3

        according to the standard

        [3] and other

        DBO5 (mg/l)

        357,5

        60

        83.2

        physicochemical parameters.

        TA (mg/l)

        55

        10

        81.2

        possibility of availability of water resources. It is in

        this context that the present work is registered and

        Parameter Input to output of abatement%

        aims the treatment and reuse of wastewater from a pH

        7.27

        8.1

        – – –

        small town of 2500 people through the use of a Cl- (mg/l)

        885,123

        308,14

        65

        pilot lagoon and to the design of the treatment plant PO -2 (mg/l)

        8,73

        3,9

        55.3

        Mg+2, Ca+2 (mg/l)

        145,57

        25,2

        83.3

        SO -2 (mg/l)

        435,33

        72,038

        83.5

        NO – (mg/l)

        8,19

        2,39

        70.8

        + (mg/l) 9,994

        Determination and followed indicators pollution NH4

        49,6

        parameters was carried out in part by the extent of MES (mg/l)

        492,86

        126,5

        74.3

        microbiological parameters and secondly by Turbidity (NTU)

        302,57

        35,60

        88.2

        measuring the BOD5 (biochemical oxygen DCO (mg/l)

        demand), COD (chemical oxygen demand)

        792,3

        116,66

        85.3

        according to the standard

        [3] and other

        DBO5 (mg/l)

        357,5

        60

        83.2

        physicochemical parameters.

        TA (mg/l)

        55

        10

        81.2

        the pilot the pilot

        wastewater Town station. 4

  2. Materials and methods 4

    3

    All measurements were performed according to the AFNOR standard [4, 5]. Microbiological analyzes were performed at the Pasteurs Institute in Casablanca.

    Conductivity (ms/cm)

    4,1612 2,93 >30

    Table 2 : Abatement rate of microbiological parameters

    assimilation of inorganic phosphorus by algae, or by combining with other elements (iron, calcium)

    Parameter Input to the pilot

    output of the pilot

    Abatement

    %

    and form insoluble compound (CaPO4, MgPO4, K2PO4) which precipitate at the sediment, or by

    Germ Totals 123

    0

    100

    absorption of these ions.

    Total coliforms

    (cfu/ml) 10.106

    103

    99.99

    The reduction of NO -could be explained either

    3

    by denitrification of nitrate to atmospheric

    Germ Totals 123

    0

    100

    absorption of these ions.

    Total coliforms

    (cfu/ml) 10.106

    103

    99.99

    The reduction of NO -could be explained either

    3

    by denitrification of nitrate to atmospheric

    (cfu/ml)

    Fecal streptococci (U/100ml)

    3.106 103 99.96

    molecular nitrogen (N2) which is optional or anaerobic denitrification, either by assimilation by autotrophic microorganisms (nitrifying bacteria) to derive energy, or as by reductionof ammonium

      1. Phenotypic appearance of the pilot

        station

        The phenotypic appearance of the water treatment plant produces a change in water color: to the input of the pilot water is turbid with a gray color and a pungent odor, at output of the pilot becomes greenish color with disappearance of foul smell, which is a first visual indicator of treatment.

      2. Physicochemical parameters

        The performance of the pilot plant was evaluated by calculating the abatement rates of main parameters indicative of pollution between the input and the output of the pilot. Concentrations at the exit of the pilot indicate a very significant abatement, except for some elements.

        The pH showed a slight increase to the basic of

        7.27 to 8.1. This change could be explained either by the dissociation of carbonic acid (H2CO3) from the hydration of CO2 in carbonates (HCO3-) when carbonic acid disappears as well as other acids generated in the waste water, or by the complexing

        NH4 + [11] (Table 1), it has evolved to 9.994 mg / l to 49.6 mg / l.

        1. Microbiological parameters

          Microbiological reduction recorded at the output of the pilot plant is almost 100% for all germs [12, 13]: Germs totals, total coliforms, fecal streptococci, and the absence of other germs pathogens (salmonella, vibrio) and the total absence of parasites represented by helminthes eggs. This justifies the reduction of chlorides which occurred in the inhibition of metabolic and bacterial activity. (Table 1)

        2. The elements of metallic trace

          The metal analysis was carried out to laboratories UATRS Rabat. The analysis results are presented in Table 3.

          Table 3 : Reduction of the metallic elements

          before and after treatment

          Element Al As Cu Fe Ni Pb

          with other oxide ions (CaCO3, CaSO4 …).

          wastewate

          r

          0.06

          5

          0.00

          6

          0.02

          1

          0.14

          3

          0.00

          5

          0.00

          9

          The chlorides showed a reduction of 65%, this

          Treated

          0.02

          0.00

          0.02 0.02

          0.00

          0.00

          decrease may be due to the complexing of these

          water 0 3 8 4 5

          ions in other chemical forms forming new

          abatement

          69 56 3 80 30 46

          %

          compounds (MgCl2, vinyl chloride: CH2ClCH2Cl, RD

          10 0.1 0.5 3 1 0.5

          CaCl2) [7] not to mention the involvement of

          (ONEP)

          chloride in the destruction of pathogens and bacteria generally.

          RI (ONEP)

          0.1 1 3 1 0.5

          Moreover, there is a reduction of 88.2% for turbidity, 74.3% for suspended solids and 85.3% for COD. This shows the ability of the pilot to eliminate the pollution load [8].

      3. Nutrients

The reduction rate of orthophosphate (55.3%) comes in a major portion of the mineral phosphorus excretions of organisms [9, 10] has decreased significantly, which could be argued by the

According to the results we can see that the metal concentrations are below the values authorized by the standards [14, 15]. Therefore, they pose no health risk. These low levels justify the absence of industrial activities in the town. The only source of these elements could be the soil or water consumption of the population [16].

The reduction of these elements is probably due to sedimentation in the form of oxides complexed

with other elements or assimilated by zooplankton organisms [17].

  1. Conclusion

    The COD/BOD5 ratio is 2.6, it expresses the biodegradability of the effluent and it is at the upper limit of the range of domestic wastewater biodegradable.

    The results of analyzes are very probative and show that the pilot plant conceived, allowed to obtain a good rate reduction for all physicochemical and microbiological parameters.

    These results suggest that the treatment process by lagoon is ideally suited to the treatment of wastewater from the town and the treated water can be reused for irrigation

  2. Bibliography

  1. Cherouaki R., Naja J., Eddeguesse L., Lamiri.

    A. Conception et dimensionnement dune station dépuration pour le traitement des eaux usées. J. Catal. Mat. Env. Volume 8, (2009) pp. 157-161.

  2. Mara, D.D., Pearson, H.W. Design manual for waste stabilization ponds in Mediterranean countries. Lagoon Technology. international Ltd., Leeds, Englan. (1998). 112 p.

  3. AFNOR, Association Française de Normalisation. Qualité de leau. Tome 1: Terminologie, échantillonnage et évaluation des méthodes. 6ème édition. Paris 2001.

  4. Coutellier, A. Lépuration des eaux urbaines, les données de lenvironnement, 1FEN n°98, (2004) p.1-4.

  5. Rodier J., Bazin C., Broutin J.P., Chambon P., Champsaur H., Rodi L. Lanalyse de leau: Eaux naturelles, eaux residuaires, eaux de mer: chimie, physico-chimie, microbiologie, biologie, interpretation des resultats. 8éme édition. DUNOD (Editeur), Paris, France. (1996).

  6. Yves Paepegaey, P., Seynave, O., Saadi N. waterproofing of aerated lagoons of the souf valley with a bituminous geomembrane. Rencontres Géosynthétiques (2011), 8éme édition. p 263-272

  7. Bontoux, J. Introduction à l'étude des eaux douces, eaux naturelles eaux usées, eaux de boisson. Cebedoc ed., Liège, (1993).169 p.

  8. Dominique Buestel, Stephane Pouvreau. La matière particulaire des eaux du lagon de Takapoto: nourriture potentielle pour les élevages dhu tres perlières Original Research Article

    Oceanologica Acta, Volume 23, Issue 2, 4 (2000),

    pp 193-210.

  9. Dillon, P. J., W. B.Kirchner. The effects of geology and land-use on the export of phosphorus from watercheds. Wat. Res. volume 9 (1975) pp: 135-148.

  10. Behrendt , H. and. Opitz D. Retention of nutrients in river systems: dependence on specific runoff and hydraulic load. Hydrobiologia. 410: (2000) 111-122.

  11. Rosenfled, J. Ammonium adsorption in nearshore anoxic sediments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 1 (1979) pp: 403-407.

  12. Alpha.1989. Standard methods for examination of water and waste water. 17th ed., Washington DC.

  13. Nono, A., Likeng, J.D.H., Wabo ,H., Tabue Youmbi, J.,Gbiaya, S. Influence de la nature lithologique et des structures géologiques sur la qualité et la dynamique des eaux souterraines dans les hauts plateaux de lOuest-Cameroun. J. Biol. Chem. Sci., 3 (2), (2009) pp. 218239.

  14. ONEP. Cahier des charges pour lexploitation du service public dassainissement liquide p.27- 30 , décret N° 2.04.553 du 13 hija 1425(24 janvier 2005) relatif aux déversement écoulements, rejets, dépôts direct ou indirects dans les eaux superficielles ou souterraines. (2005)

  15. Moroccan standard. Setting standards for drinking water for human consumption. Official Gazette No 5062 of 30. Ramadan 1423 (5-12- 2002).

  16. Gomez, A., Solda, P., Lambrot C., Wilbert, J., Juste, C.. Bilan des éléments-traces métalliques transférés dans un sol sableux en monoculture irriguée de maïs. Conv. Min. Env. / INRA n° 89- 256, 57p. (1992)

  17. Boularbah, A, Schwartz, C, Bitton, G, Morel, JL. Heavy metal contamination from mining sites in South Morocco: 1 .use of a biotest to assess toxicity of trailings. Chemosphere 6 (5) (2006) pp.802810

Leave a Reply