A Comparitative Study on Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Self-Compacting Concrete with Different Grades

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV6IS080226

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

A Comparitative Study on Hybrid Fiber Reinforced Self-Compacting Concrete with Different Grades

K. Santhi 1, PG Scholar,

Department of Civil Engineering, Aditya Engineering College, Suramaplem, Kakinada, A.P., India.

K. Pavan Kumar2 Asst. Professor,

Department of Civil Engineering, Aditya Engineering College, Suramaplem, Kakinada, A.P., India.

Abstract – The SCC spreads uniformly due to its own weight, without any additional compaction energy, and does not entrain air. SCC in the fresh state of the main features are filling capacity, through the ability and separation resistance. The fibers have been produced in a wide range of materials, shapes and properties. Improve the properties (strength and toughness) of brittle cementitious materials by bridging cracks; pass the crack stress and counteract the crack propagation. Add fibers to the SCC to increase performance, mainly in terms of bending, impact and compressive strength. The fiber can be affected by crowded reinforcement of the flow capacity and the ability to pass, which is considered the main aspect of the SCC. Compared with ordinary self – compacting concrete, the flow strength characteristics of fiber reinforced self – compacting concrete and mixed fiber reinforced self – compacting concrete are studied. In this study, the M30 & M40 grade self-compacting concrete mix was used by previous researchers. The steel fibers used in this study were crimped steel fibers having a diameter of 0.4 mm x

20 mm (aspect ratio 50) and hooked steel fibers having a diameter of 0.5 mm and a length of 30 mm (aspect ratio of 60). In this study, crimped steel fibers and hook-shaped end steel fibers were added in different proportions to obtain cement with a total fiber content of 2% by weight to obtain various SFRSCC and HFRSCC mixtures. The mixture was designated as SCC0, SFRSCC2C, SFRSCC2H, HFRSCC (0.5C + 1.5H), HFRSCC (1.0C + 1.0H) and HFRSCC (1.5C + 0.5H). This project examines the fresh and hardening properties of SFRSCC and HFRSCC mixtures. With the increase in fiber content in the SCC mix, the flowability is adversely affected. Mixing fiber- reinforced SCC mixtures have better flow properties than single fiber reinforced SCC mixtures. The addition of fibers to the SCC mixture reduced the flow properties of the SCC mixture but met the acceptance criteria for the SCC mixture (Table 5.1). The addition of 0.5C + 1.5H or 1.5C + 0.5H mixed fibers to the SCC mixture provides better flowability than the combination of 1.0C + 1.0H. The compressive strength of all FRSCC and HFRSCC mixtures was improved compared to the control combination SCC0. The compressive strength of the mixed fiber reinforced SCC mixture was reduced as compared to the single fiber reinforced SCC mixture (Table 5.3). The compressive strength of HFRSCC (0.5C + 1.5H) or HFRSCC (1.5C + 0.5H) is greater than that of HFRSCC (1.0C + 1.0H), but in the case of split tensile strength and bending strength.

Key Words: Fiber reinforced concrete, crippled fiber, hooked fiber, hybrid reinforced concrete, self-compacting concrete, compression strength, split tensile strength and flexural strength.

  1. INTRODUCTION:

    Self-compacting concrete was originally developed in Japan and Europe. Even in the case of reinforcement, can simply flow through the weight and fill the corners of the corners of the corners of the concrete, without any vibration or other types of compaction.

    Compared with conventional concrete, due to better compaction, non-SCC and other tensile strength, the elastic modulus may be slightly higher due to the paste and slightly increase the paste, the shrinkage of concrete normal, bond strength Better, fire resistance and non-SCC similar to the durability is better than surface concrete.

    However, various studies have been carried out to explore the various features and structural applications of SCC. The SCC has established effective materials and therefore needs to guide the normalization of its own integration features and its application in different construction applications and to use all hazardous and inaccessible project areas to achieve superior quality control.

    Self-compacting concrete (SCC) is an innovative concrete that does not require placement and compaction of vibrations, it can flow freely, fully fill the template and achieve full compaction, even with crowded steel bars.

      1. Literature review:

        Nan Sua, Kung-Chung Hsu et al. In 2001, a new type of concrete self-compacting concrete design method (SCC) was proposed. The results show that this method can successfully produce high quality SCC. Compared with the method developed by the Japan Ready-Mixed Concrete Association (JRMCA), this method is simpler, easier to implement, more time-saving, reduced bundling and cost savings.

        Behnam Vakhshouri, ShamiNejadi 2016 shows a hybrid design of light self-compacting concrete. The advantages of combining LWC and SCC are a new field of research. Taking into account the light weight and ease of placement of the structure, light self-compacting concrete may be the answer to the growing construction requirements for extending and strengthening structural components.

        Kishor S Sable, Madhuri K et al. The effects of different types of steel fibers and aspect ratio on the mechanical properties of self – compacting concrete are proposed. The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the properties of fiber concrete without fiber and concrete, as well as the effects of fiber and self-compacting concrete on different types and aspect ratios. A number of tests were conducted, including SCC's workability test, compression test, direct tensile test and bending test.

        N.Nalanth et al. In 2014, recycled materials were used as an alternative to assess the freshness and hardening properties of steel fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete. In this study, the addition of steel fibers to the concrete improves the mechanical properties of the SCC and can be applied to beams and column joints. Determine the compression, tensile and bending strength parameters and give the results. The results show that the combination of brick and steel fiber can be widely used in SCC.

        Haddadou N, Chaid R et al. 2014 proposed the effect of mixed steel fibers on the properties of fresh and hardened self-compacting concrete. The purpose of this study was to compare the performance of SCC and fiber reinforced self- compacting concrete (FRSCC) with a large number of mineral additives. Two different types of steel fibers are combined using different lengths of 50 mm and 30 mm. The results show that mechanical properties are improved by introducing steel fibers, in particular splitting tensile strength and flexural strength into SCC.

        SyalTarun, Goel Sanjay et al. The workability and compressive strength of polypropylene reinforced fiber reinforced self – compacting concrete were proposed. In this paper, two different types of fibers of steel fiber (SF) and polypropylene fiber (PPF) are used in different combinations of 25-75%, 50-50%, 75-25% and total fiber volume fraction of 0.5% use. The effects of fiber inclusions on the processing performance and compressive strength parameters of hybrid fiber reinforced self – compacting concrete (HFRSCC) were studied.

      2. Objectives of the study:

        The work reported in this study, the usage of fiber with different percentages in the concrete corresponding results by partial addition of fibers and compared with controlled concrete and plotting the corresponding graphs separately.

        The present investigation is aimed to study the compressive Strength, split tensile strength and flexural strength of M30 & M40 grade of concrete mix with a partial addition of fiber with hooked & crippled fibers. The fibers are added to the concrete with different percentages as 0%, 0.5C + 1.5H, 1.0C

        + 1.0H, 1.5C + 0.5H with normal concrete. The Compressive Strength was calculated at the age of 7, 28days. The splitting tensile strength and flexural strength tests were calculated at the age of 28days.

      3. Experimental Investigation:

    1.3.1 Materials used

    Cement: Ordinary Portland cement of 53 grade was used. The Cement used has been tested for various proportions as per IS IS 4031-1988 and found to be confirming to various specifications of 12269-1987.

    Fine aggregate

    The material which passes through BIS test sieve number 4 (4.75mm) is termed as fine aggregate usually natural sand is used as a fine aggregate at places where natural sand is not available crushed stone is used as fine aggregates. In our region fine aggregate can be found from bed of Krishna River. It conforms to IS: 383 1970 comes under zone II.

    Coarse aggregate

    Coarse aggregate crushed angular granite metal of 12 mm, 20mm size was used.

    20mm size Steel fibers:

    In this study, crimped steel fibers and steel hook ends were used, as shown in Table 3.2. Steel fiber is made of cold drawn steel. Galvanized, stainless steel.

    Crimped steel fibers

    Hooked end steel fibers

    Tables 1 shows the physical properties of fibers.

    Table1: physical properties

    S.N

    o

    Property

    Steel hooked end

    Steel crimpled

    1

    Diameter

    0.50 mm

    0.4 mm

    2

    Length

    30 mm

    20 mm

    3

    Aspect ratio L/D

    60

    50

    4

    Yield strength of wire

    > 1000 M pa

    > 1000 M pa

    5

    Wire tensile strength

    > 1450 M pa

    1100 M pa

    6

    Strain at failure

    < 4%

    7

    Tolerance for

    D/L

    +/- 10%

    +/- 10%

    8

    Appearance

    Bright and

    clean wire

    Bright and clean

    wire

  2. EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM:

2.1 Mix Proportions:

Mix proportions were adopted as per IS-10262-2009. For test specimens 53 grade port land cement, natural river sand and coarse aggregate, copper slag from plant is being utilized. The experimental program was designed to the study of mechanical properties of concrete with additional of fibers to the concrete for M30 & M40 grade of concrete.

Compressive Strength of Cubes

The compressive strength of concrete was determined by conducting tests on 150 mm x 150 mm x 150 mm cube specimens were casted and cured for 7 and 28 days. The test was carried out in the compression testing machine of 2000kN capacity. In this test 36 cubes were tested. The cubes were placed in the compression testing machine and the load was applied until the failure of the specimen. The average values of three samples were taken as strength.

The compressive strength of the cubes after addition of fibers with SCC0, SFRSCC2C, SFRSCC2H, HFRSCC (0.5C

+ 1.5H), HFRSCC (1.0C + 1.0H) and HFRSCC (1.5C + 0.5H)

is studied for 7 & 28days shown in Table 2 & 3.

Table 2: Compressive Strength of M30 Mix concrete

S.No

Percentage of fibres added

7 Days(Mpa)

28 Days(Mpa)

1

0C+0H

24.95

38.25

2

0.5C+1.5H

34.78

43.40

3

1.0C+1.0H

26.35

32.93

4

1.5C+0.5H

28.68

40.50

Table 3: Compressive Strength of M40 Mix concrete

S.No

Percentage of fibres added

7 Days(Mpa)

28 Days(Mpa)

1

0C+0H

31.10

46.05

2

0.5C+1.5H

38.15

49.40

3

1.0C+1.0H

32.00

45.10

4

1.5C+0.5H

34.25

46.55

Split Tensile Strength of Cylinders

The determination of tensile strength of concrete is necessary to determine the load at which the concrete members may crack. The cracking is a form of tension failure. Split tensile strength is an indirect method of finding out the tensile strength of concrete. Tensile splitting strength of 150 mm diameter and 300 mm height cylinders tested and 18 cylinders were prepared. The test is carried out by placing the cylindrical specimens horizontally between the loading surfaces of the compression testing machine and the load is applied until the failure of the cylinder.

The split tensile strength of the cylinders after addition of fibers with SCC0, SFRSCC2C, SFRSCC2H, HFRSCC (0.5C

+ 1.5H), HFRSCC (1.0C + 1.0H) and HFRSCC (1.5C + 0.5H)

is studied for 7 & 28days shown in Table 4 & 5.

Table 4: Split tensile Strength of M30 Mix concrete

S.No

Percentage of fibres added

28 Days

1

0C+0H

2.950

2

0.5C+1.5H

3.253

3

1.0C+1.0H

3.423

4

1.5C+0.5H

3.196

Table 5: Split tensile Strength of M40 Mix concrete

S.No

Percentage of fibres added

28 Days

1

0C+0H

3.019

2

0.5C+1.5H

3.45

3

1.0C+1.0H

3.73

4

1.5C+0.5H

3.32

Flexural Strength of Prism

Flexural strength tests were carried out on 150 mm x150 mm x 700 mm beams on the 28th day using Universal Testing Machine (UTM) apparatus. The system of loading used in finding out the flexural tension is two point loading as per IS 5161959.

The flexural strength of the beams after addition of fibers with SCC0, SFRSCC2C, SFRSCC2H, HFRSCC (0.5C + 1.5H), HFRSCC (1.0C + 1.0H) and HFRSCC (1.5C + 0.5H)

is studied for 7 & 28days shown in Table 6 & 7.

Table 6: Flexural Strength of M30 Mix concrete

S.No

Percentage of

fibres added

28 Days(Mpa)

1

0C+0H

5.000

2

0.5C+1.5H

5.859

3

1.0C+1.0H

5.921

4

1.5C+0.5H

5.650

Table 7: Split tensile Strength of M40 Mix concrete

S.No

Percentage of fibres added

28 Days

1

0C+0H

5.931

2

0.5C+1.5H

5.983

3

1.0C+1.0H

6.056

4

1.5C+0.5H

5.766

DISCUSSIONSAND RESULTS

As can be seen from the results, as the grade of concrete increases, the effective maximum size of the aggregate decreases. In the above case, M30 grade cement content of 425 kg / m3, M40 grade cement content of 500 kg / m3. Four different percentages of the above two fibers have been achieved and the same method is used for further study.

The split tensile strength of the M30 & M40 grades of concrete with different percentages. With regard to the percentage of fibers, note a trend similar to compressive strength. All of these two different healing ages are true.

The details of the flexural strength of different percentages of fibers and two grades of concrete. At 7 and 28 days, the effective size of the aggregate of the M30 & M40 grade concrete is 12 mm.

Graphs:

Grapp Compressive strength of M30 Grade mix with various % of fibers at the age of 7 & 28 days.

Compression Strength for 7

Days

50

24.95

38.95

26.35

28.68

0

0C+0H 0.5C+1.5H 1.0C+1.0H 1.5C+0.5H

Compression Strength for 7 Days

28 Days Compression Strength

Test

50

43.4

0

0C+0H 0.5C+1.5H 1.0C+1.0H 1.5C+0.5H

28 Days Compression Strength Test

32.93

30.25

40.5

Graph 2 Compressive strength of M40 Grade mix with various % of fibers at the age of 7 & 28 days.

Compression Strength for 7

days

Flexural Strength test for M30

grade of concrete

50

Flexural Strength test for M40

grade of concrete

Compression Strength Test for 28 Days

0C+0H 0.5C+1.5H 1.0C+1.0H 1.5C+0.5H

Flexural Strength test for M40 grade of concrete

5.766

5.983

5.931

6.056

6.2

6

5.8

5.6

0.5C+1.5H 1.0C+1.0H 1.5C+0.5H

0C+0H

40

46.55

45.1

46.05

45

Compression Strength Test for

28 Days

49.4

Flexural Strength test for M30 grade of concrete

0.5C+1.5H 1.0C+1.0H 1.5C+0.5H

0C+0H

4.5

5.921

5

5.859

5.65

6

5.5

5

0C+0H 0.5C+1.5H 1.0C+1.0H 1.5C+0.5H

Compression Strength for 7 days

34.25

32

38.15

31.1

60

40

20

0

Graph 3 Split tensile strength of M30 & M40 Grade mix with various % of fibers at the age of 28 days.

Split tensile strength test for M30

grade

3.5

3.253

3.423

3.196

3

2.95

2.5

0C+0H

0.5C+1.5H 1.0C+1.0H 1.5C+0.5H

Split tensile strength test for M30 grade

Split Tensile Strength Test for M40

Grade

4

3

2

1

0

3.019

3.45

3.73

3.32

0C+0H 0.5C+1.5H 1.0C+1.0H 1.5C+0.5H

Split Tensile Strength Test for M40 Grade

Graph4 Flexural strength of M30 & M40 Grade mix with various % of fibers at the age of 28 days.

CONCLUSIONS:

Based on a detailed experimental study of the SCC portfolio, the purpose is to develop a combination of performance and draw the following conclusions.

  • A mixture of 0.5% C + 1.5% H and 1.5% C + 0.5% H produced better freshness than 1.0% C + 1.0% H.

  • In the compression strength test values it has been observed that 1.0% C + 1.0% H when compared to 0.5% C + 1.5% H and 1.5% C + 0.5%.

  • In the split tensile strength test values it has been observed that 0.5% C + 1.5% H and 1.5% C + 0.5% shows better results when compared to 1.0% C + 1.0% H.

  • In the flexural strength test values it has been observed that 0.5% C + 1.5% H and 1.5% C + 0.5% shows better results when compared to 1.0% C + 1.0% H.

  • The developed SCC mix with and without the addition of hybrid fibres (Crimped and Hooked) satisfy the rheological properties.

  • From the fresh property results it can be concluded that adding fibres affects the workability of fresh concrete.

REFERENCES

  1. South Su, Kung Fu, Su Wen, his culture. "A simple mix design method for self-compacting concrete", "Cement and Concrete Research 31 (2001) 1799-1807".

  2. BehnamVakhshouri, ShamiNejadi. "Design of mixed lightweight self – compacting concrete". Building Materials Case Study 4 (2016) 1-14 in Science Direct.

  3. B. Krishna Rao, Professor Ravindra, "Steel Fiber Reinforced Self-Compacting Concrete with F Grade Fly Ash".

    International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. 2 (9), 2010, 4936-4943.

  4. Dhiyaneshwaran, .Ramanathan, Bhaskar and Venatasubramani. "Study on the workability and durability of viscous modified admixtures and SCC containing fly ash and glaze B233".

  5. International Journal of Engineering and Innovation (IJEIT) Volume 2, No. 1, July 2012, "International steel fiber and aspect ratio on the mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete."

  6. Rafat Siddique, Paratibha Aggarwal, Yogesh Aggarwal.Influence of water / powder ratio on strength properties of self-compacting concrete containing coal fly ash and bottom ash "" Construction and Building Materials 29 (2012) 73-81.

  7. Abbas AL-Ameeri. "Effect of Steel Fibers on Some Mechanical Properties of Self – compacting Concrete". American Civil Engineering Journal 2013; 1 (3): 102-110.

  8. N. Nalanth, Vincent Venkatesan and M. S.Ravikumar. "Evaluation of the Fresh and Hardened Properties of Steel Fiber Reicforced Self-compacting Concrete Using Recycled Aggregates as a Replay Material". Hindawi Publishing Corporation Advances in Civil Engineering Volume 2014, Article ID 671547.

  9. Amatha Mohammed Sally (Nathir Shafiq), Muhammad al "Performance of fiber reinforced self-compacting concrete with different pozzolan materials: International status", International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering (IJCSER) Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp: (22-27), October 2013 – March 2014.

  10. M. G. Alberti, A. Enfedaque, J.C. Galvez, "Comparison of polyester fibers reinforced vibrated ordinary concrete and self- compacting concrete". Construction and Building Materials 85 (2015) 182-194 at Science direct.

  11. Haddadou N, ChaidR, Ghernouti Y and AdjouN. "Effect of mixed steel fibers on the properties of fresh and hardened self- compacting concrete". J. Build.Mater.Struct. (2014).

  12. S. Kanakambara Rao, P. VenkataMallikarjun Rao, S.Chandra Babu, G. Rajendra and M. SuyraTeja, "Effects of Reinforced Reinforced Self-compacting Reinforced Concrete", International Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Vol. 2, No. 1 Year 2014.

  13. SyalTarun, Goel Sanjay, BhutaniManish "Machinability and Compressive Strength of Steel Polypropylene Mixed Fiber Reinforced Self-Compacting Concrete", International Technology Emerging Technologies and Latest Trends Magazine "6 (1): 7-13 (2013).

Leave a Reply