A Conceptualized Framework for Planning Organizational Information System

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS100232

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

A Conceptualized Framework for Planning Organizational Information System

Dr. Thomas Yeboah, HOD,Computer Science, Christian Service University College

Abstract

The successful implementation of organizations information systems (IS) solely depends on effective

planning for those information systems. This means that the failure or success of Organizations Information System depends much on the ability for the stakeholders to plan those Information Systems well; therefore improved IS planning is one of the critical issues facing IS executives today. Effective IS planning can help organizations use IT to reach business goals. It can also enable organizations to use IT to significantly impact their strategies. However, if you dont carry out IS planning carefully; the results will include both lost opportunities and the waste of expensive IT resources. In order to perform IS planning effectively, organizations apply one of several IS planning methodologies. The main idea that the researcher seeks to address is to come out with a holistic methodology that can be used in Planning Organizational Information Systems.

Keywords: IS Planning, Methodologies, Selection, analyzing, Information Systems, Holistic Framework.

  1. Introduction

    Information Systems (IS) planning, according to Finnegan and Fahy (1993) is a broadly based management activity that provides direction within an organizational setting for the development and use of information systems and technology. Thus, IS planning explains how the Information System would be developed to support organizational activities, usage of Information System within the organizational settings as well as the technology to support these organizational activities. It means therefore that effective IS planning process determines where an organization is going and how the organization establish a link between the organizational goals and their Information Systems. An IS plan provides an opportunity for an organization to exploit rapidly advancing information technology. However, in the IS planning process the initial problems normally encounter by the

    IS planners is the selection of IS planning methodology to use for a particular organization based on the organizational goals and objectives. The success of IS Planning mainly based on the selection of one or more IS planning methodologies' that will assist IS planners in their mission. This means that the main fulcrum that contributes to the success of IS planning is the ability for the IS planner to select the appropriate IS Planning methodology for the job. It has been observed recently that a number of IS planning methodologies have been proffered which has generated confusion, not only concerning which methodology to use, but also what methodologies are being offered.

    In view of this the research seeks to come out with a holistic framework that can be used in Planning Organizational Information Systems.

  2. Literature Review

    It can be observed from documentation that almost all the IS planning methodologies geared towards or derived their methodologies from the levels in IS planning activities. It means therefore that to come out with IS planning methodology one should understand the levels in IS planning activities. Anthony (1965) conceptualized

    the levels of IS planning activities across three hierarchical levels:

    • Strategic Planning

    • Management Control

    • Operational Control

      Again, Davis and Olson (1985) conceptualized the levels of IS planning activities across Four hierarchical levels. In their model the top three levels mainly corresponds to Anthonys model with additional level of scheduling and planning. Table 1-1 gives comparison of Anthony (1965) and Davis and Olson (1985) models of the levels of IS planning activities.

      Levels of Planning

      Anthonys Framewor k

      Explanation

      Strategic

      Same

      A set of long-

      Planning

      range goals

      that describe

      the IT

      architecture

      and major IT

      initiatives

      needed to

      Levels of Planning

      Anthonys Framewor k

      Explanation

      Strategic

      Same

      A set of long-

      Planning

      range goals

      that describe

      the IT

      architecture

      and major IT

      initiatives

      needed to

      Table 1-1: Anthony (1965) and Davis and Olson (1985) models compared

      scheduling

      Assign

      and

      specific units

      planning

      of

      organizational

      and

      Dispatching

      activity to

      achieve

      operational

      objectives.

      achieve the goals of the organization.

      Tactical

      Managemen

      Physical

      Planning

      t Control

      implementatio

      n of the

      strategic

      plans. This

      includes

      reflected in

      capital

      expenditure

      budget and

      long-range

      staffing plan

      in the

      organization.

      Operationa

      Operational

      It deals with

      l planning

      Control

      allocation of

      tasks to each

      organizational

      Planning

      Control unit in

      order to

      achieve

      objectives of

      management

      control.

      achieve the goals of the organization.

      Tactical

      Managemen

      Physical

      Planning

      t Control

      implementatio

      n of the

      strategic

      plans. This

      includes

      reflected in

      capital

      expenditure

      budget and

      long-range

      p>staffing plan

      in the

      organization.

      Operationa

      Operational

      It deals with

      l planning

      Control

      allocation of

      tasks to each

      organizational

      Planning

      Control unit in

      order to

      achieve

      objectives of

      management

      control.

      IS Strategic Planning

      The major component of IS planning is the IS strategic plan of the organization. This means that before one can formulate an organizations IS planning very well there is the need also to consider the organizations IS strategic plan since it is the IS Strategic plan that can give you the description of IT architecture and major ITs initiatives and method of implementation. Finnegan and fahy defined IS Strategic plan as a set of long-range goals that describe the IT architecture and major IT initiatives needed to achieve the goals of the organization. According to them the IS strategic plan of every organization must meet three objectives:

      • It must be aligned with the organizations strategic plan

    • It must provide for an IT architecture that enables users, applications, and databases to be seamlessly networked and integrated.

    • It must efficiently allocate IS development resources among competing projects, so the projects can be completed on time, within budget, and have the required functionality.

      Again, in the formulation of IS strategic Plan Rowe, Mason and Dickel (1982) identified three key tasks in developing an effective strategy which include the following:

    • Identify a distinctive competence for the organization. A distinctive competence is something the organization does particularly well. It refers to the organizations unique resources and capabilities for conducting its business, and describes its strengths and its ability to overcome its weaknesses.

    • Find a niche in the organizations environment. A niche is a social and economic situation for which the organization is well suited. An effective niche is one that positions the organization in such a way that it can take advantage of the opportunities that present themselves and avert threats from the environment.

    • Find the best match between the organizations distinctive competencies and its available niches.

      Management Control

      After the formulation of the IS Strategic plan there is need to physically implementation of the strategic plans. This includes reflected in capital expenditure budget and long-range staffing plan in the organization.

      Operational Control

      Identification of IS and IT details of the ISs to support those business processes and the underlying IT infrastructure are analyzed and a development plan is decided. It deals with allocation of tasks to each organizational Planning Control unit in order to achieve objectives of management control.

      Based on Anthonys model, Bowman, et.al. (1983) also came out with three generic planning activities as:

    • Strategic IS planning: establishing the relationship between the overall organizational plan and the IS plan.

    • Organizational information requirements analysis: identifying broad, organizational information requirements to establish a strategic

      information architecture that can be used to direct specific application system development project.

    • Resource allocation: allocating both IS application development resources and operational resources.

  3. Methodology

    In order to come out with a new IS planning methodology there is the need to know some of the drawbacks of the existing IS planning methodologies. The IS planning methodologies considered in this research work include Earls Multiple methodology, Business System planning (BSP) and Critical Success Factor (CSF).

    Population

    The population of this research consisted of IT professionals selected at FIVE regions in Ghana. The reason for including only five regions was to delimit the study and minimize certain differences that could emerge due to socio-economic and ethnic differences of the IT professionals. The total population of was five hundred IT professionals (500).

    Sample Techniques

    or sampling frame is made up of sub-sets of known size. These sub-sets make up different proportions of the total, and therefore sampling should be stratified to ensure that results are proportional and representative of the whole. The reason why this sampling technique was appropriate for this study is to get the IS planning professionals who are in the teaching field and also practicing in the IT industries as well as those who are only in the industries.

    Sample Size

    As the sample was selected by stratified sample technique; two strata of IT personnel were made. One of the strata constitutes those IS planning professionals who are in the teaching field and also practicing in the IT industries as well as those who are only in the industries. In view of this a sample size of three hundred and eighty (380) was obtained for the study which constitutes 76% of the total population for the study.

    Table 1 2: Sample size of IT Professionals obtained from Five Regions of Ghana

    S/N Region Number of IT

    Professionals

    In this study the sampling techniques used

    1 Ashanti 100

    was Stratified Sampling techniques. This

    2 Brong-Ahafo 86

    method is used when the parent population

    1. Eastern 60

    2. Central 72

    3. Western 62

    Total 380

    Instrument for the Study

    In order to obtain the data for the study two sets of instruments were used. The two instruments used in the study include:

    • Questionnaire (Demographic Form)

    • Interview

  4. Results

Upon thoroughly consideration of the results from the respondents the researcher summarized the IS planning activities across Five levels as outlined in table 1-3. If an item is marked with a C it means the component of the methodology considers the level of IS planning activities, item marked with a P is partial fulfillment of level of IS planning activities and finally if item is not marked it means it does not consider the level of IS planning activities.

Table 1 3: IS Planning Methodologies and Levels they Considered

IS

planning Activity

IS Planning Methodology

Earls Multiple Methodolo gy

Busine ss System Plannin g (BSP)

Critica l Succes s Factor (CSF)

Strategic Plan

P

P

C

Manageme nt Plan

P

C

C

Operationa l Plan

C

C

C

Scheduling and Planning

User Involveme nt

C

New IS Planning Methodology (Proposed Framework)

Upon thoroughly consideration of all the drawbacks identified in all the three IS planning methodologies researcher came out with the following framework that can be used by IT Professionals in Planning

Information Systems. Figure 1-1 gives the proposed IS planning methodology:

Figure 1-1: propoed IS planning methodology:

User Involvement

The involvement of users in information systems development, whether it is to design new systems or to modify existing ones, is held to be one of the most important factors influencing implementation success or failure (Mumford & Weir, 1979). There is the need to place the users at the central part in the planning process.

Strategic Plan

Establishing the relationship between the overall organizational plan and the IS plan.

Management Control

This deals with physical implementation of the strategic plan. This includes reflected in

capital expenditure budget and long-range staffing plan in the organization.

Operational Control

Identification of IS and IT details of the ISs to support those business processes and the underlying IT infrastructure are analyzed and a development plan is decided.

Scheduling and Planning

Decomposition of organizational functional areas into its designated positions to achieve organizational objectives

References

  1. Alter, S. 2007. Information systems. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

  2. Anthony, R.N. (1965), Planning and Control Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Harvar University Press

  3. Anthony, R.N.(1988), The Management Control Function, Harvard Business School Press, 1988.

  4. Badow, J.F.(1990), "Putting Information Systems Planning Methodologies Into Perspective, Journal of Systems Management, v. 41, n. 7, pp. 6-9

  5. Banett, S.S., and Konsynski, B.R. (1982), "Inter-Organization Information Sharing Systems,"MIS Quarterly, v. 6, n. 5, pp.93-105

  6. Benbasat, I., Dexter, A. S., Drury,

    D.H. and Goldstein, R.C.(1985), "A Critique of the Stage Hypothesis: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Communications of the ACM, v. 27, n. 5, pp. 476-485,

  7. Bowman, B., Davis, G.B. and Wetherbe, J.C. (1983), "Three Stage Model of MIS Planning," Information and Management, v.6, n.1, pp. 11-25,

  8. Cash, J.I., McFarlan, W.F., McKenney, J.L. and Vitale, M.R.,1999, Corporate Information Systems Management: Text and Cases, Second Edition, R.D. Irwin,

  9. Davis, G.B. and Olson, M.H. 2005, Management Information Systems: Conceptual Foundations, Structure, and Development, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill.

  10. Forouzan, B. A. 2004. Data communication and networking. McGraw Hill, Inc.

  11. Halsall, F. 2005. Computing networking and the Internet. Addison-Wesley, Inc.

  12. Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. 2007. Essentials of management information systems. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

  13. Meyer, M., & R. Baber. 2000. Computer in your future. Que Publication.

  14. Stallings, W. 2003. Computer organization and architecture. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

  15. Sommerville, I. 2001. Software engineering (6th ed.). Addison- Wesley, Inc.

  16. Tanenbaum, A. S. 2006. Structured computer organization. Prentice- Hall, Inc.

  17. Turban, E., Rainer, R. K., & Potter,

    R. E. 2005. Introduction to information technology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

  18. Wang, P. S. 1988. An introduction to Berkeley UNIX. Thompson Organization.

Leave a Reply