Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Building using Different Software Programs

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV13IS010087

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Analysis and Design of Reinforced Concrete Building using Different Software Programs

Authors:

Eng. Zubeida Tajelsir Abdallah Elsheikh And Dr. Majdi Elgaili Mukhtar Ahmed

Department of civil engineering, alzaiem alazhari university kafori Block 7, khartoum north, sudan

  1. ABSTRACT:

    The research dealt with how to analyze a multi-story building consisting of a ground floor and 5 floors using manual analysis and programs. Etabs and Excel programs were used to compare with the manual design.

    The manual method used for the analysis is the moments distribution with excel program.

    A structural analysis of wind loads for a building consisting of 6 floors was carried out using manual and computer methods. The results were compared and it was found that the results are close.

    The slabs, columns, beams, and foundations were analyzed manually, and the structural design of the structural elements was made and compared with the program design, and it was found that the results are close.

    Key word:

    Analysis, Design, moment distribution (Excel program) and portal frame.

    Objective:

    To analysis and design a multi-story RC building. Manual analysis is done with the aid of Excel software.

    Analysis and design is done with the aid of Etabs & SAFE software. And compare the design with Robot software.

    The design is done with the aid of revit software.

    To gain design knowledge on various structural elements like beam, column, slab, and foundation .etc.

    INTRODUCTION:

    Now a days due to overpopulation and high cost of land, multi-storied building is more essential for metropolitan city. Multi-storied Residential building is the perfect solution for living of high populated area. A multi-storied building, which possess multiple floor above the ground level, which aim to increase the floor area of building in shortest built up area.

    Structure analysis is a subject which involves designing, planning to build up a perfect building. Basically each project are different with their design criteria such as incoming load, soil properties, dynamic load, built up area etc. Here we provided the details to complete a residential apartment theoretically.

    We firstly collected some required data to measure the soil specific such as moisture content, bearing capacity of soil, types of soil etc. We provided the perfect parameter in beam, slab, column and footing with the consideration of incoming load to avoid shear and bending collapse. In

    Accordance with limit state method of collapse in BS 0.0035

    We built G+5 building which deal with strength and stability of structure under maximum design load Flexure, compression, shear and torsion.

    1. METHODOLOGY:

    Design of concrete member

    Planning and drawing

    Analysis in ETABS

    &SAFE and Robot

    DATA COLLECTION

    Detailing of residential building

    WORK PROGRESS

    BASIC DATA

    1. Type of building Residential building.

    2. Type of structure multi story rigid jointed framed iii. No. of story 6 (G+5)

  1. Floor to floor height 3 m.

  2. External walls 250 mm including plaster

  3. Internal walls 150 mm including plaster.

  4. Bearing capacity of soil 200 KN/m2

  5. Height of plinth 0.5 m.

NOTE:-Others required data assume using NBC(national building code) for planning and (BS8110) & (ACI 318-14)for concrete design work.

Table 2-1 Table 2-5

Table 2-2

Table 2-3

Table 2-4

Table 2-6

Name

Design Type

Element Type

Material

Total Thickness mm

SLAB 18

Slab

Shell-Thin

Fcu25

180

Slab 20C,

Slab

Shell-Thin

Fcu25

200

Table 2-7

B.S CODE:

3. OUT PUT ANALYSIS:

Figure 3-1 Robot modeling

Figure 3-2: Deform shape

COLUMN RESULT

Fcu=30N/mm2

Table 3-1: Loads & moment

MEMBER

ETABS

ROBOT

F

My

Mz

F

My

Mz

C1

Short col&Gr

2176

-6.4

0.13

2104

.79

7.16

1st & 2nd

1623

2.6

0.45

1564

-1.2

6.16

3rd & 4th &5th

805

1.45

-0.24

774

-4.56

3.3

C2

Short col&Gr

1283

0.8

-3.6

1000

9.1

-3.9

1st & 2nd

913

-2.2

36.3

836

23

-0.43

3rd & 4th &5th

683

17

-30

496

20.3

0.25

C3

Short col&Gr

714

-4.3

-3.2

451

-2.7

1.4

1st & 2nd

509

10.8

18.3

364

9.4

9.98

3rd & 4th &5th

252

8.1

16.3

213

-8.6

-7.5

Table 3-2: COLUMN DESIGN

6T16mm As=1206mm^2

6 120/

MEMBER

ETABS

ROBOT

MANUAL

C1

Short col&Gr (30*60)cm

6T16mm As=1206mm^2

6 120/

6T16mm As=1206mm^2

6 150/

1st & 2nd (30*55)cm

6T16mm As=1206mm^2

6 120

6T16mm As=1206mm^2

6 120

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 150/

3rd & 4th &5th (45*25)cm

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 120

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 120

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 150/

C2

Short col&Gr (30*50)cm

6T16mm As=1206mm^2

6 120/

6T16mm As=1206mm^2

6 120/

6T16mm As=1206mm^2

6 150/

1st & 2nd (30*45)cm

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 120

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 120

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 150/

3rd & 4th &5th (40*25)cm

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 120

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 120

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 150/

C3

Short col&Gr 1st & 2nd (40*25)cm

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 100

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 100

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 150/

3rd & 4th (40*20)cm

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 100

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 100

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 150/

Table 3-3: Beam Design

D.L=13.4KN/m fcu=25N/mm2

section

ETABS

ROBOT

MANUAL

B(20*40)

cm

Load

My

Fz

Load

My

Fz

Load

My

Fz

13.4

KN/m

50

KN.m

73KN

13.4

KN/ m

31.9

KN.m

+37

-37

KN

13.4

KN/m

B(20*50)

cm

Load

My

Fz

Load

My

Fz

Load

My

Fz

13.4

KN/m

+18.4

-28.3

KN.m

-45.1

13.4

KN/ m

-27.4

+16.5

KN.m

+51

-45.3

KN

13.4

KN/m

12.3

KN.M

32.3

KN

Table 3-4: Beam design at X direction: At mid span

section

ETABS

ROBOT

MANUAL

mom

design

mom

design

mom

design

B2(20*40)cm

0

Assembly rein 2T16 As=402mm2

R6@160mm c/c

31.9

2T16

As=402mm2 R6@160mm c/c

2T16 As=402mm2

R6@160mm c/c

B1(20*50)cm

+18.4

2T16

As=402mm2 R6@160mm c/c

+18.6

2T16

As=402mm2 R6@160mm c/c

12.3

2T16 As=402mm2

R6@160mm c/c

At interior support

section

ETABS

ROBOT

MANUAL

mom

design

mom

design

mom

design

B2(20*40)cm

-56.6

2T16

As=402mm2 R6@160mm c/c

3.3

2T16

As=402mm2 R6@160mm c/c

2T16 As=402mm2

R6@160mm c/c

B1(20*50)cm

-26

2T16

As=402mm2 R6@160mm c/c

-24.9

2T16

As=402mm2 R6@160mm c/c

-10.6

2T16 As=402mm2

R6@160mm c/c

Maximum shear (concrete and stirrups):

section

ETABS

ROBOT

MANUAL

shear

design

shear

design

shear

design

B2(20*40)cm

+72

R6@160mm c/c

-34.9

R6@160mm c/c

B1(20*50)cm

+43.3

R6@160mm c/c

-44

R6@160mm c/c

34.8

Table 3-5: Beam design at Y direction: At mid span positive:

section

ETABS

ROBOT

mom

design

mom

design

B1(20*50)cm

+35

2 16

As=402mm2

+45

2 16 As=402mm2

At interior support negative

section

ETABS

ROBOT

mom

design

mom

design

B1(20*50)cm

-42

2 16

As=402mm2

-35

2 16

As=402mm2

At support:

section

ETABS

ROBOT

mom

design

mom

design

B1(20*50)cm

-42.4

2 16

As=402mm2

-31.8

2 16

As=402mm2

Maximum shear (concrete and stirrups):

section

ETABS

ROBOT

mom

design

mom

design

B1(20*50)cm

+74.8

6@160mm c/c

-68

6@160mm c/c

SLAB DESIGN:

Table 3-6: Positive moment bottom:

member

ETABS & SAFE

ROBOT

MANUAL

Moment

design

Moment

design

Moment

design

Roof slab(Y)

7

T10@300mmc

/c

7

T10mm@300 mmc/c

13.6

3T12mm@300mmc

/c

Floor slab(X)

28

T12mm@200 mmc/c

33

T12mm@200 mmc/c

72.4

4T12mm@200mmc

/c

Floor slab(Y)

33

T12mm@200 mmc/c

28.2

T12mm@200 mmc/c

86.4

3T12mm@300mmc

/c

Table 3-7: Negative moment top

td>

Moment

member

SAFE

ROBOT

MANUAL

design

Moment

design

Moment

design

Roof slab(Y)

16

T10@300mmc/c

12.7

Middle strip T10@300mmc/c Col strip T10@200mmc/c

13.6

Middle strip T16@500mmc/c Col strip T16@500mmc/c

Floor slab(X)

80

Middle strip T16@300mmc/c Col strip

72.7

Middle strip T16@300mmc/c

106.7

Col strip 5T16mm@200mmc/c

Middle strip 2T16@500mmc/c

Col strip T16@100mmc/c

T16@100mmc/c

Floor slab(Y)

116

Middle strip T16@300mmc/c

77.2

Middle strip T16@300mmc/c

98.7

Col strip 5T16mm@200mmc/c

Col strip T16@100mmc/c

Col strip T16@100mmc/c

Middle strip 2T16@500mmc/c

Figure 3-3 Check of punching shear: Robot

ETABS:

Figure 3-4: chech of punching shear

  • I added on ETABS modeling three beams to the slab to check the punching shear

Stair Design:

L.L=3KN/m2 D.L=3.7KN/m2

Table 3-8: Design of stair

ETABS& SAFE

ROBOT

MANUAL

Mx

bottom

Top

At support

Mx

bottom

Top

Mx

X direction

Y direc

-21

4T10@25

0mmc/c

4T12@250

mmc/c

-15.2

4T10@250

mmc/c

4T10@

250mm c/c

-10.4

4T10@250

mmc/c

4T10@250

mmc/c

Foundation design:

Design of footings: Fy=460N/mm2 T16mm Q=h =20*1.4=28KN/m2 K=120*(200-28)=20640KN/m2 K=20.60MPa

Thickness=680mm

p=200KN/m2 fc=25N/mm2 K=120*q

Figure 3-5: Ultimate load in footings

Figure 3-6 check of punching shear

Figure 3-7 Check of soil pressure:

Robot:

Fy=460N/mm2 T16mm p=200KN/m2 fc=25N/mm2 K=120*q Q=h =20*1.4=28KN/m2

K=120*(200-28)=20640KN/m2 K=20.60MPa

Thickness=600mm

Figure 3-8: Ultimate load in footings

FOUNDATION DESIGN:

Table 3-9: Positive moment top:

member

ETABS & SAFE

ROBOT

Moment

design

Moment

design

Floor slab(X)

353

T16mm@200mmc/c

250

T16mm@170mm c/c

Floor slab(Y)

420

T16mm@300mmc/c

19.7

T16mm@240mm c/c

Table 3-10: Negative moment bottom:

member

SAFE

ROBOT

Moment

design

Moment

design

Floor slab(X)

-165

Middle strip T16@200mmc/c Col strip T16@90mmc/c

-602.6

Middle strip T16@120mmc/c Col strip T16@90mmc/c

Floor slab(Y)

-114.8

Middle strip T16@200mmc/c Col strip T16@90mmc/c

-576

Middle strip T16@120mmc/c Col strip T16@90mmc/c

Figure 3-9 check of punching shear

Figure 3-10 Check of soil pressure:

ACI CODE:

Figure 3-11: Deform shape in Robot

Figure 3-12 Deform shape in ETABS

Table 3-11: Column design:

member

ETABS

ROBOT

C1

Short col&Gr (30*60)cm

6T16mm As=1206mm^2

6 120/

6T16mm As=1206mm^2

6 120/

1st & 2nd

(30*55)cm

6T16mm As=1206mm^2

6 120

6T16mm As=1206mm^2

6 120

3rd & 4th &5th

(45*25)cm

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 120

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 120

C2

Short col&Gr (30*50)cm

6T16mm As=1206mm^2

6 120/

6T16mm As=1206mm^2

6 120/

1st & 2nd

(30*45)cm

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 120

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 120

3rd & 4th &5th

(40*25)cm

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 120

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 120

C3

Short col&Gr 1st & 2nd (40*25)cm

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 100

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 100

3rd & 4th

(40*20)cm

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 100

4T16mm As=804mm^2

6 100

Table 3-12: Beam design at X direction:

At mid span positive

section

ETABS

ROBOT

mom

design

mom

design

B(20*40)cm

+19.3

2 16

As=402mm2

27

2 16 As=402mm2

B(20*50)cm

+14

2 16

As=402mm2

+11

2 16 As=402mm2

:

At interior support negative

section

ETABS

ROBOT

mom

design

mom

design

B2(20*40)cm

-7.8

2 16

As=402mm2

3

2 16 As=402mm2

B1(20*50)cm

-22

2 16

As=402mm2

-14

2 16 As=402mm2

Maximum shear (concrete and stirrups):

section

ETABS

ROBOT

shear

Dist of stirrups

shear

Dist of stirrups

B2(20*40)cm

-32

6@160mm c/c

-29

6@160mm c/c

B1(20*50)cm

-33

6@160mm c/c

-38.8

6@160mm c/c

At support:

section

ETABS

ROBOT

mom

design

mom

design

B1(20*50)cm

-23

2 16

As=402mm2

-12

2 16

As=402mm2

Table 3-13: Beam design at Y direction: At mid span positive:

section

ETABS

ROBOT

mom

design

mom

design

B1(20*50)cm

+29

2 16

As=402mm2

+39

2 16 As=402mm2

At interior support negative

section

ETABS

ROBOT

mom

design

mom

design

B1(20*50)cm

-27

2 16

As=402mm2

-30

2 16

As=402mm2

At support:

section

ETABS

ROBOT

mom

design

mom

design

B1(20*50)cm

-38.3

2 16

As=402mm2

-27

2 16

As=402mm2

Maximum shear (concrete and stirrups):

section

ETABS

ROBOT

mom

design

mom

design

B1(20*50)cm

-52

6@160mm c/c

-58.7

6@160mm c/c

SLAB DESIGN:

Fy=420N/mm2 fc=20N/mm2 h=250mm

Table 3-14: Positive moment

Bottom:

member

ETABS & SAFE

ROBOT

Moment

design

Moment

design

Roof slab(Y)

7

6@200mmc/c

6

56

Floor slab(X)

26

10mm@150m mc/c

22

610

Floor slab(Y)

29.8

10mm@150m mc/c

20

610

Table 3-15: Negative moment top

member

SAFE

ROBOT

Moment

design

Moment

design

Roof slab(Y)

20.4

Middle strip

6@250mmc/c Col strip

6@100mmc/c

27

Middle strip

6@200mmc/c Col strip

6@100mmc/c

Floor slab(X)

75

Middle strip

16@400mmc/c Col strip

16@100mmc/c

111

Middle strip 316

Col strip 6 16

Floor slab(Y)

103

Middle strip

16@400mmc/c Col strip

16@100mmc/c

86

Middle strip 316

Col strip 6 16

ROBOT

  • For economy slab I must minimize the thickness of slab to 22cm

Figure 3-1: Check of punching shear:

ETABS:

Figure 3-14: Check of punching shear:

Stair Design:

L.L=4.79KN/m2 D.L=3.7KN/m2 Fy=420N/mm2 h=0.18m

Table 3-16: stair design

ETABS

ROBOT

Mx

bottom

Top

Mx

bottom

Top

Mx

bottom

Top

-18

4 10

4 10

at support

-16

4 10

4 10

at support

-10.4

4 10

4 10

at support

Design of footings:

Fy=280N/mm2 Ø=16mm p=200KN/m2 fc=25N/mm2 K=120*q

Q=h =20*1.4=28KN/m2 K=120*(200-28)=20640KN/m2 K=20.60MPa

Figure 3-15: Ultimate load in footings in robot

Figure 3-16: Ultimate load in footing in ETABS

Table 3-17: design of footings with ROBOT program

ROBOT

Type

L

B

H

bottom

top

X direction

Y direction

X direction

Y direction

F1

1.5

1.5

0.5

7Ø16@250mm

7Ø16@250mm

F2

5.5

2.7

0.6

20Ø16@100mm

34Ø16@150m

m

F3

2.2

2.2

0.5

10Ø16@200mm

10Ø16@200m

m

F4

3.7

1.9

0.5

20Ø16@100mm

24Ø16@150m

m

F5

3.1

3.1

0.5

33Ø16@90mm

25Ø16@120m

m

F6

2.7

6

0.7

20Ø16@130mm

39Ø16@150m

m

17Ø16@300

mm

14Ø16@200mm

F7

5.7

2.9

0.7

38Ø16@150mm

22Ø16@130m

m

`

F8

2.7

1.6

0.5

13Ø16@200mm

10Ø16@160m

m

F9

5.5

2.8

0.6

26Ø16@100mm

34Ø16@160m

m

F10

7.8

2.9

0.5

Ø16@100mm

Ø16@100mm

Ø16@220mm

Ø16@220mm

F11

7.4

2.7

0.5

Ø16@100mm

Ø16@100mm

Ø16@220mm

Ø16@220mm

F12

8

2.8

0.5

Ø16@100mm

Ø16@100mm

Ø16@220mm/p>

Ø16@220mm

Figure 3-17: Check of punching shear for F10

Figure 3-18: Check of punching shear for F11

Figure 3-19: Check of punching shear for F12

CHEACK WITH SAFE PROGRAM:

Figure 3-20: Check of soil pressure:

  • F(A-8) , F(C-8)& F(E-8) I have increase their dimensions because the soil pressure was not exceeded.

Figure 3-21: Check of punching shear

Table 3-18: design of footings with SAFE program

SAFE

Type

L

B

H

bottom

top

X direction

Y direction

X direction

Y direction

F1

1.5

1.5

0.5

Ø16@250mm

Ø16@250mm

F2

5.5

2.7

0.6

Ø16@120mm

34Ø16@150mm

F3

2.2

2.2

0.5

Ø16@150mm

Ø16@150mm

F4

3.7

1.9

0.5

Ø16@100mm

Ø16@150mm

F5

3.1

3.1

0.5

Ø16@90mm

Ø16@80mm

F6

2.7

6

0.7

Ø16@130mm

Ø16@150mm

F7

5.7

2.9

0.7

Ø16@150mm

Ø16@130mm

`

F8

2.7

1.6

0.5

Ø16@200mm

Ø16@150mm

F9

5.5

2.8

0.6

Ø16@100mm

Ø16@100mm

F10

7.8

2.9

0.5

Ø16@120mm

Ø16@100mm

Ø16@250mm

Ø16@250mm

F11

7.4

2.7

0.5

Ø16@100mm

Ø16@100mm

Ø16@250mm

Ø16@250mm

F12

8

2.8

0.5

Ø16@100mm

Ø16@100mm

Ø16@250mm

Ø16@250mm

0.60

0.55

0.45

0.45

Details:

c2

c2

c2

c2

c2

c3

c2

c1

A

B

c1

c1

c1

c1

c1

c1

c1

c2

C

c1

c1

c1

c1

c1

c1

c1

c2

D

c1

c1

c1

c1

c1

c1

c1

c2

E

c2

c2

c2

c2

c2

c2

c2

c3

F

G

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

0.30

0.30

0.25

0.25

C1

at top 13? 6mm@

at top 13? 6mm@

at top 13? 6mm@ at top 13? 6mm@ main Rein 4? 16 170mm main Rein 4? 16 170mm

main Rein 6? 16 170mm main Rein 4? 16 170mm bottom Stirrup 6? 6 bottom Stirrup 6? 6

bottom Stirrup 6? 6 bottom Stirrup 6? 6 @90mm @90mm @ 90mm @ 90mm

C2 0.30 0.30 0.20

at top 13? 6mm@ at top 13? 8mm@

at top 13? 6mm@

at top 13? 6mm@

170mm main Rein 4? 16 170mm main Rein 4? 16 170mm

main Rein 4? 16 170mm

main Rein 6? 16 bottom Stirrup 6? 6

bottom Stirrup 6? 6 bottom Stirrup 6? 6 bottom Stirrup 6? 6

@90mm

@ 90mm @90mm @90mm

0.25 0.20 0.20

C2

at top 13? 6mm@ at top 13? 6mm@ at top 13? 6mm@ main Rein 4? 16 170mm main Rein 4? 16 170mm main Rein 4? 16 170mm

bottom Stirrup 6? 6 bottom Stirrup 6? 6 bottom Stirrup 6? 6

@ 90mm @90mm @90mm

0.50

0.40

0.45

0.40

0.40

0.40

0.40

Figure 3-22 columns

4

4

section B 1

?

2? 16

8@250

section 4-4

2? 16

1 3 2

1 3 2

1 3 2

1

3

2

1

3

2

1 3

2

1

3

2

1 3 2 T16

1 3 2

1 3 2

1

3

2

1

3

2

1 3

2

1

3

2

0.20

2? 16

4? 16 4? 16

? 8@ ? 8@ ? 8@

150 mm 150 mm 150 mm

2? 16 4? 16 2? 16

sect 1-1 sect 2-2 sect 3-3

0.50

Figure 3-23: Beams

Top

bottom

? 16@100mm c/c

2.43 1.30

4.00 3.00 3.05 2.40 2.85 3.45 3.75

A B

C

D

E

16T @ 300mm (T )E.W. T 12@ 200mm (B )E.W.

F

G

16T @ 500mm (T )E.W. T 12@ 200mm (B )E.W.

1

2

3

4 5

6

7

8

1.30 2.45

? 16@300mm c/c

? 16@500mm c/c

A

B

C

? 16@200mm

D

E

F

G

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

? 16@200mm

Figure 3-24: Slab details

? 16@100mm

? 16@100mm

? 16@ 100mm

? 16@100mm

? 16@300mm

? 16@100mm

? 16@300mm

? 16@100mm

? 16@ 300mm

L1/4

L2/4

L1/4

L2/4

L1/4 L2/4

? 16@300mm

5.L1 L2/4

L1/4 L2/4

L1/4 L2/4

L1/4 L2/4

L1/4

? 12@200mm

? 12@200mm

? 12@200mm

4.00

3.00

3.05

2.40

2.85

3.45

3.75

section 1-1

? 16@ 300

? 16@ 500

? 16@300

? 16@500

? 16@300

? 16@300

? 16@300

? 16@500

? 16@300

? 12@ 200

? 12@ 200

section 2-2

Figure 3-25: section of slab

T 12@ 250mm

T 10@ 250mm

T 10@ 200mm

stair seaction

Figure 3-26: stairs

8T @ 230mm

8T @ 120mm

16T @ 250mm

16T @ 250mm

D

depend on site

H

50?

single footing

b

? 16@250mm

D

d

B

? 16@250mm

PLAN FOR SINGLE FOOTING

Figure 3-27: Isolate footing:

@ 100 mm

? 16@ 250

100mm

T @ 100 mm

? 16@ 120

SECTION F 10

? 16@ 100mm

? 16@ 100mm

L

B

Figure 3-28: Continues footing:

? 16@ 250 L ? 16@ 160

SECTION F 9

? 16@250

? 16@250

H

PLAN F 9

Figure 3-29: Combined footing:

L

h

Figure 3-30: raft foundation

4. CONCLUSIONS:

  1. After analyzing the G+5 story building structure, concluded that structure is safe in loading like dead load, live load and wind load.

  2. Member dimensions (Beam, Column and Slab) are assigns by calculating the load type and its quantity applied on it. AutoCAD plan gives detailed information of the structure members length, height, size and numbers etc.

  3. ETABS & ROBOT has the capability to calculate the reinforcement needed for any concrete section. SAFE program used to check the foundation design. The program contains a number of parameters which are designed as per.

  4. The next paper the analysis will be done using deformed shape by using software programs.

  5. The ETABS program extracts high values, while the robot extracts low values. In my personal opinion, the robot produces more accurate values. The program uses the Finite method and works on analyzing all the elements, even the foundations, while ETABS designs most of the elements, and the design of the foundation and slab is verified using the SAFE program.

  6. The difference in torque values is somewhat large, especially in beams, but as for the design, the design is almost uniform.

    5. REFERENCES:

    1. British standard BS8110: Part 1:1997 Code of practice for design and construction. British

      Standard Institution: London.

    2. D Polette and J MLanders, 1997Consrtuction Systems, London, Goodheart-Wilcox Co.

    3. T.J.MancGinley and B.S.Choo, 1990 Reinforced Concrete Design Theory and Examples,2nd

      edition, London, SPON Publishers.

    4. Eugene JO and Andrew SD, 1999 Reinforced and Prestressed Concrete Design the Complete

Process, 2Tld edition, London Longman Publishers.

5,Moseley WH and Bungy JH, 1999 Reinforced Concrete Design, 5th edition, London, Macmillan Publishers.

  1. Building Code Requirements for structural Concrete (ACI318-08) and Commentary (ACI 318-14), American Concrete Institute, P.O. Box 9094, Farmington Hills, Michigan.

  2. Arthur H. Nilson, David Darwin, Charls W. Dolan, Design of concrete structures, 13th

    edition.

  3. Arthur H. Nilson, George Winter, Design of concrete structures, 10th edition.

  4. D. Fanella, I. Alsamsam, The Design of Concrete Floor Systems, PCA Professional

    Development Series, 2005.

  5. McGregor, J.G. Reinforced Concrete Mechanics and Design, Prentice Hal, New Jersey, 1997.