- Open Access
- Authors : Ashish Kumar Gupta , Dr. Saleem Akhtar , Dr. Aslam Hussain
- Paper ID : IJERTV9IS010142
- Volume & Issue : Volume 09, Issue 01 (January 2020)
- Published (First Online): 25-01-2020
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Analysis of A Tall Building with Shear Wall of RCC and Steel Plate
Ashish Kumar Gupta [1], Dr. Saleem Akhtar [2], Dr. Aslam Hussain [3] [1] Student of ME Structural Engineering, Department of Civil Engineering
[2] Prof. Department of Civil Engineering [3] Assistant Prof. Department of Civil Engineering University Institute Of Technology,Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya, Bhopal, (M.P.)
Absrtract:- Tall Structures are most influenced by lateral forces in seismic prone areas. The most significant basis to be considered in the design of the tall structures is to oppose lateral forces which can cause instability and sudden failure of the structure. In this manner it is necessitated that structure ought to have enough lateral stability to oppose lateral forces and to control the lateral displacement of the building. The shear wall is one of the most generally utilized lateral loads opposing System in elevated structures Shear wall has high in-plane stiffness and quality which can be utilized to all the while opposing enormous horizontal loads and support gravity loads. The incorporation of the Shear wall has turned out to be inescapable in multi-storeys working to oppose lateral forces. It is exceptionally important to decide the successful, effective and ideal location of the shear wall. In this paper, seismic analysis has been done on G+ 10 storeys building in Zone IV. The analysis has been done considering shear wall of RCC and steel plate. Parameters like axial load, displacement, Overturning moment, stiffness etc. are determined for different location of shear wall.
Keywords Shear wall, Seismic loading, lateral loading
1. INTRODUCTION
The basic role of all kinds of structural systems utilized in a building type structures is to support gravity loads. The most widely recognized loads resulting from the impact of gravity are dead load, live load and snow load. Other than these vertical loads, buildings are likewise exposed to lateral loads brought about by the wind, impact load or seismic tremors. Following are the various structural systems:
-
Structural frame systems: the structural system comprises of frames. Floor slabs, beams, and columns are the essential components of the structural system. Such frames can carry gravity loads while giving satisfactory stiffness.
-
Structural wall systems: in this kind of structures, all the vertical members are made of structural walls, generally called shear walls.
-
Shear wallframe systems (double systems): the system comprises of reinforced Concrete frames interacting with reinforced concrete shear walls.
Shear wall is a structural part in a reinforced concrete framed structure to oppose lateral forces, for example, wind forces. Shear walls are commonly utilized in tall structures subject to the lateral breeze and seismic forces. In reinforced concrete framed structures the impact of wind forces increase as the height of the structure increases.
-
LITERATURE REVIEW
Author name
Name of Journal
Title name
Research finding
Peter Timler et al. (1998)1
The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 1998
Volume-7, PP. 233249
Experimental and analytical studies of steel plate shear walls as applied to the design of tall buildings
In this study, three variations of a steel framed office building were used as case studies. Competitive reinforced concrete designs were also performed for economic comparisons.
Astaneh-Asl (2001)2
SEAONC Seminar, November 2001, San Francisco. PP. 1-18
Seismic Behaviour and Design of Steel Shear Walls
Seismic design of steel shear walls including provisions on
how to establish strength of the wall as well as provisions on detailing to ensure sufficient ductility are made.
Burcu Burak (2013)3
Journal of Structural Engineering 2013, Volume-139, PP. 1928-
1937.
Effect of shear wall area to floor area ratio on the seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete buildings
The results obtained from the nonlinear time history analyses including roof drift, inter story drift, and the base shear responses are evaluated to obtain the effect of shear wall area to floor area ratio on the seismic performance of RC buildings that have no torsional irregularities.
Sumit Pawah (2014)4
International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering (IJETAE), 2014,
PP. 244- 252
steel plate shear wall – a lateral load resisting system
Provision of part shear walls in zone V is not enough to keep maximum displacements within permissible limits, whether it is a beam slab framed structure or framed structure with flat slabs with drop.
R.Resmi and S.Yamini Roja (2016)6
International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 2016, ISSN NO.
0973-4562 Vol. 11 No.3 ,
PP. 369-370
A review on performance of shear wall
Shear wall provided along the periphery of the structure is found to be more effective.
-
OBJECTIVES OF THE PRESENT STUDY
-
To prepare 3D model of a tall building for detailed analysis.
-
To perform analysis of a tall building without shear wall.
-
To perform analysis of the tall building using RCC shear wall.
-
To perform analysis of the tall building using steel plate shear wall.
-
To compare the results of analysis of the tall building with and without shear walls.
-
To draw suitable conclusion from the above analysis.
-
-
SCOPE OF STUDY
The accuracy and the ability of the proposed structure are tested by static lateral load analysis in shear wall-frame system. In order to check the validity of the proposed models are executed on taken into consideration structural systems, in which shear walls are modelled via wall factors of ETABS [2015]. This analysis of lateral load resisting members in a building will assist us to increase the stability of structure against displacement and to decreases bending moment in vertical members (column).
2. METHODOLOGY
Table 1. Description of member used
RCC Frame |
Steel Frame |
|
Design data of building |
Dimension |
Dimension |
Plan dimension |
25m*25m |
25m*25m |
No. of bay x-direction No. of bay Y-direction |
5 Bay 5 Bay |
5 Bay 5 Bay |
No. of storey |
G+10 |
G+10 |
Typical storey height |
3000mm |
3000mm |
Bottom storey height |
3000mm |
3000mm |
Size of column |
800*800(auto selected) |
ISHB400-2(auto selected) |
Size of beam |
200*600(auto selected) |
ISHB400-2(auto selected) |
Thickness of slab |
200mm |
200mm |
Thickness of shear wall |
200mm (concrete Shear wall) |
200mm (steel plate shear wall) |
Table 2. Material property
Material |
Concrete Frame |
Steel Frame |
Concrete |
M-30 |
|
Steel |
HYSD500 |
HYSD500 |
Shear Wall |
M-30 |
HYSD500 |
-
STEPS FOR ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS
-
We choose Indian code for design.
Etabs>file>new model>use built -in setting with>set (display unit, steel design code, concrete code section database)
-
Selection of Grid Plan. No. of Grid Lines in X and Y-Direction are 5. Spacing in X and Y-Direction is 5m. No. Of Storeys in Building are 10. Height of typical Storey and Bottom Storey is 3m.
-
Selection of grid dimensions and defining the material properties of the building section.
Define>Material Properties>Add New Material>Material Properties Data
-
Defining material properties and section properties of the building section.
Define>sectional properties>frame section>frame properties>add new properties >choose concrete>frame section properties data
-
Defining the slab properties of the building section.
Define>sectional properties>slabs properties>slabs properties data
-
Selection of beam and column section from toolbar, draw the building frame section.
Quick draw beam>properties of beam section>select beam properties> draw the beam>Quick draw column>properties of column section>select column properties>draw the column>Quick draw slab>properties of slabs>select the slabs properties>draw the slab
-
Drawing the wall of the building.
Quick Draw wall> properties of wall section>select wall properties> draw the wall
-
Designing the shear wall.
Wall of the building>assign>shell>pier label>choose>P1>apply>select wall of building>assign>shell>spandrel label>choose S1>select wall of building>assign>shell>wall auto mesh option>shell assignment wall auto mesh option>advanced modify/auto mesh rectangular>select wall of building>assigning the load
-
THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING FOR ANALYSIS The following eight models are taken for analysis purpose:
Model 1: In this model, no shear wall has been provided at the concrete frame building.
Model 2: In this model, the Concrete Shear wall has been provided at the corners of the buildings.
Model 3: In this model, the Concrete shear wall has been provided at the corner of the R.C.C building in the tubular form throughout ten storeys.
Model 4: In this model, the concrete shear wall has been provided at the middle (tubular form) and at the corners of the R.C.C building throughout ten storeys.
Model 5: In this model, no shear wall has been provided at steel frame building.
Model 6: In this model, the steel plate shear wall has been provided at the corner of the steel building.
Model 7: In this model, the steel plate shear wall has been provided at the corner of the building in the tubular form.
Model 8: In this model, the steel plate shear wall has been provided at the middle (tubular form) and corner of the building.
Plan Elevation Plan Elevation MODEL-1 MODEL-2
Plan Elevation Plan Elevation MODEL-3 MODEL-4
Plan Elevation Plan Elevation MODEL-5 MODEL-6
Plan Elevation Plan Elevation MODEL-7 MODEL-8
Figure1. Various models taken for analysis purpose
-
ANALYSIS AND RESULTS
Structural analysis is done for all the eight models. Parameters obtained through analysis include maximum storey deflection, maximum storey drift, storey shear, overturning moments generated while applying earthquake load on the structure. Results are shown below in tabular and graphical form.
-
MAXIMUM STOREY DISPLACEMENT
The values of maximum storey displacement, as mentioned in IS 1893(part 1): 2002, for various models are given below.
Table 3. Maximum storey displacement (mm)
Storey
Model1
Model2
Model3
Model4
Model5
Model6
Model7
Model8
Storey10
25.95
25.816
25.239
21.24
13.005
9.959
8.949
7.738
Storey9
24.827
24.713
24.155
20.179
11.68
8.884
7.938
7.227
Storey8
23.058
22.966
22.437
18.682
10.161
7.7
6.838
6.484
Storey7
20.773
20.701
20.213
16.737
8.566
6.476
5.715
5.605
Storey6
18.102
18.05
17.613
14.407
6.954
5.243
4.597
4.667
Storey5
15.162
15.126
14.75
11.786
5.367
4.036
3.516
3.725
Storey4
12.051
12.029
11.721
8.98
3.862
2.897
2.507
2.819
Storey3
8.852
8.841
8.606
6.115
2.496
1.87
1.608
1.974
Storey2
5.632
5.63
5.473
3.373
1.337
1.007
0.858
1.202
Storey1
2.577
2.478
2.399
1.092
0.468
0.356
0.301
0.509
Base
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
MAX. STOREY DISPLACEMENT
30
20
10
0
Model1
Model2 Model3 Model4 Model5 Model6 Model7 Model8
MAX. STOREY DISPLACEMENT
30
20
10
0
Model1
Model2 Model3 Model4 Model5 Model6 Model7 Model8
STOREY
STOREY
DISPLACE MENT (mm)
DISPLACE MENT (mm)
Figure 1. Maximum Storey Displacement at different storeys for various models
Comparing all the models, it has been found that the highest displacement value occurred at the 10th storey in model-1 & lowest value in model-8. The value of displacement increases with height, There is abrupt reduction in the values of displacement, as shown in the table 3 due to the replacement of concrete shear wall with the steel plate shear wall (SPSW).
-
MAXIMUM STOREY DRIFT
The values of maximum storey drift obtained for various models after analysis, as per IS 1893(part 1): 2002, are given in table 5 and shown graphically in figure 3.
Table 4. Maximum storey drifts (mm)
Storey
Model1
Model2
Model3
Model4
Model5
Model6
Model7
Model8
Storey10
0.000356
0.000479
0.000352
0.000374
0.000367
0.000362
0.000391
0.000360
Storey9
0.000499
0.000507
0.000367
0.000395
0.000583
0.000573
0.000595
0.000378
Storey8
0.000649
0.000532
0.000374
0.000408
0.000755
0.000741
0.000762
0.000393
Storey7
0.000777
0.000538
0.000372
0.000411
0.000884
0.000867
0.00089
0.000400
Storey6
0.000874
0.000529
0.00036
0.000412
0.000975
0.000954
0.00098
0.000402
Storey5
0.000935
0.000502
0.000337
0.000415
0.001032
0.00101
0.001037
0.000406
Storey4
0.000956
0.000455
0.0003
0.000342
0.001070
0.001038
0.001066
0.000362
Storey3
0.000915
0.000389
0.00025
0.000289
0.001063
0.001045
0.001073
0.000287
Storey2
0.000762
0.000301
0.000191
0.000223
0.001051
0.001025
0.001054
0.000231
Storey1
0.000364
0.000156
0.0001
0.000119
0.000826
0.0008
0.000859
0.00017
Base
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
STOREY DRIFT VALUE
STOREY DRIFT VALUE
0.0015
0.001
0.0005
0
STOREY DRIFT VALUE
STOREY
Model 1 Model2 Model3 Model4 Model5 Model6 Model7 Model8
Figure 3. Maximum Storey Drift at different storeys for various models
The highest values of drift occurred at 3rd storey in model-7 and the lowest value at the 1st storey in model-3.
-
STOREY SHEARS
The values of maximum storey shear obtained for various models, as per IS 1893(part1): 2002, are given in table 5 and shown graphically figure 4.
Table 5. Storey shear (KN)
Storey
Location
MODEL1
MODEL2
MODEL3
MODEL4
MODEL5
MODEL6
MODEL7
MODEL8
Storey10
Top
679.712
1216.1166
1280.79
1206.65
314.68
348.432
381.77
330.241
Bottom
679.712
1216.1166
1280.79
1206.65
314.68
348.432
381.77
330.241
Storey9
Top
1330.53
2428.4462
2594.65
2436.34
570.691
655.902
740.816
609.864
Bottom
1330.53
2428.4462
2594.65
2436.34
570.691
655.902
740.816
609.864
Storey8
Top
1844.76
3386.3363
3632.77
3407.94
772.972
898.841
1024.51
830.8
Bottom
1844.76
3386.3363
3632.77
3407.94
772.972
898.841
1024.51
830.8
Storey7
Top
2238.46
4119.7209
4427.58
4151.83
927.843
1084.84
1241.71
999.954
Bottom
2238.46
4119.7209
4427.58
4151.83
927.843
1084.84
1241.71
999.954
Storey6
Top
2527.71
4658.534
5011.52
4698.35
1041.63
1221.49
1401.28
1124.23
Bottom
2527.71
4658.534
5011.52
4698.35
1041.63
1221.49
1401.28
1124.23
Storey5
Top
2728.58
5032.7099
5417.03
5077.89
1120.64
1316.39
1512.1
1210.53
Bottom
2728.58
5032.7099
5417.03
5077.89
1120.64
1316.39
1512.1
1210.53
Storey4
Top
2857.14
5272.1824
5676.56
5320.79
1171.21
1377.13
1583.02
1265.77
Bottom
2857.14
5272.1824
5676.56
5320.79
1171.21
1377.13
1583.02
1265.77
Storey3
Top
2929.45
5406.8857
5822.54
5457.42
1199.66
1411.29
1622.92
1296.84
Bottom
2929.45
5406.8857
5822.54
5457.42
1199.66
1411.29
1622.92
1296.84
Storey2
Top
2961.59
5466.7538
5887.43
5518.15
1212.3
1426.47
1640.65
1310.65
Bottom
2961.59
5466.7538
5887.43
5518.15
1212.3
1426.47
1640.65
1310.65
Storey1
Top
2969.63
5481.7208
5903.65
5533.33
1215.46
1430.27
1645.08
1314.1
Bottom
2969.63
5481.7208
5903.65
5533.33
1215.46
1430.27
1645.08
1314.1
Base
Top
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Bottom
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
STOREY SHEAR DISTRIBUTION
DIAGRAM
STOREY SHEAR DISTRIBUTION
DIAGRAM
10000
5000
0
10000
5000
0
Story1St0oryS9toryS8toryS7toryS6toryS5toryS4toryS3toryS2tory1Base
STOREY
Story1St0oryS9toryS8toryS7toryS6toryS5toryS4toryS3toryS2tory1Base
STOREY
MODEL1
MODEL2 MODEL3 MODEL4 MODEL5 MODEL6 MODEL7 MODEL8
MODEL1
MODEL2 MODEL3 MODEL4 MODEL5 MODEL6 MODEL7 MODEL8
STOREY SHEAR (KN)
STOREY SHEAR (KN)
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Top
Figure 4. Storey Shear at different storeys for various models
The highest value of storey shear at the 1st storey in model-3 and the lowest value at the 10th storey in model-5.
-
OVERTURNING MOMENTS
The values of maximum overturning moments obtained for various models, as per IS 1893(part 1): 2002, are given table 6 and shown graphically figure 5.
OVERTURNING MOMENT
(KN)
OVERTURNING MOMENT
(KN)
Table 6. Overturning moments (KN-m)
Storey
MODEL1
MODEL2
MODEL3
MODEL4
MODEL5
MODEL6
MODEL7
MODEL8
Storey10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Storey9
2039.14
3648.35
3842.36
3619.9418
944.039
1045.3
1145.31
990.724
Storey8
6030.73
10933.7
11626.3
10928.9472
2656.11
3013
3367.76
2820.31
Storey7
11565
21092.7
22524.6
21152.7682
4975.03
5709.52
6441.28
5312.71
Storey6
18280.4
33451.9
35807.3
33608.245
7758.55
8964.05
10166.4
8312.58
Storey5
25863.5
47427.5
50841.9
47703.3057
10883.4
12628.5
14370.3
11685.3
Storey4
34049.3
62525.6
67093
62936.9662
14245.4
16577.7
18906.6
15316.9
Storey3
42620.7
78342.1
84122.7
78899.3307
17759
20709.1
23655.6
19114.2
Storey2
51409
94562.8
101590
95271.5911
21358
24943
28524.4
23004.7
Storey1
60293.8
110963
119253
111826
24994.9
29222.4
33446.3
26936.6
Base
69202.7
127408
136964
128426
28641.2
33513.2
38381.5
30878.9
OVERTURNING MOMENT
DISTRIBUTION DIAGRAM
150000
100000
50000
0
MODEL1
MODEL2 MODEL3 MODEL4 MODEL5 MODEL6 MODEL7 MODEL8
OVERTURNING MOMENT
DISTRIBUTION DIAGRAM
150000
100000
50000
0
MODEL1
MODEL2 MODEL3 MODEL4 MODEL5 MODEL6 MODEL7 MODEL8
STOREY
STOREY
Figure 5. Overturning Moment at different storeys for various models
Comparison of the models, the value of highest overturning moment is at the base in model-3 while the lowest value at the base in model-5. The value of maximum overturning moment decreases with increase in height.
-
Storey Stiffness
The values of maximum storey stiffness obtained for various models, as per IS 1893(part 1): 2002, are given table 7 and shown graphically figure 6.
Table 7. Storey Stiffness (KN/m)
Storey
MODEL1
MODEL2
MODEL3
MODEL4
MODEL5
MODEL6
MODEL7
MODEL8
Storey10
322178.9
329596.1
332595.012
647128.9
639558.3
881041.3
1101660
1245556
Storey9
375357.8
393139.1
419925.28
1020658
890550
1603579
2067826
2372875
Storey8
389595.4
421260.3
454527.297
1243490
948562.8
2138608
2797246
3253574
Storey7
396738.9
436274
472419.336
1435918
960919.7
2568590
3383377
3982339
Storey6
401333.7
446609.7
484843.069
1627437
964577.7
2952517
3912037
4655721
Storey5
405097.2
455624.9
495518.152
1839425
972456.2
3360201
4477972
5388334
Storey4
408927.5
465284.8
506519.868
2095096
996908.1
3883161
5206674
6338711
Storey3
413826.9
477508
519658.077
2426784
1067743
4682063
6325502
7798968
Storey2
425504.1
496227.2
538402.522
2899211
1297464
6198207
8385944
10513960
Storey1
555872.2
611972.5
651917.075
4352119
2731866
12227370
16045927
20206529
Base
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
STOREY STIFFNESS DISTRIBUTION
DIAGRAM
25000000
20000000
15000000
10000000
5000000
0
MODEL1
MODEL2 MODEL3 MODEL4 MODEL5 MODEL6 MODEL7 MODEL8
STOREY STIFFNESS DISTRIBUTION
DIAGRAM
25000000
20000000
15000000
10000000
5000000
0
MODEL1
MODEL2 MODEL3 MODEL4 MODEL5 MODEL6 MODEL7 MODEL8
STOREY
STOREY
STOREY STIFFNESS (KN/m)
STOREY STIFFNESS (KN/m)
Figure 6. Storey stiffness at different storeys for various models
Comparison of the models, the value of highest storey stiffness is at the first storey in model-8 while the least value at the storey first in model-1. The value of maximum storey stiffness decreases with increase in height.
-
-
SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
Total 8-Models of the building were analysed. Model 1 to Model 4 consisted of concrete frame while Model-5 to Model-8 were of steel frame. Model-1 of concrete frame and Model-5 of steel frame were provided with no shear wall. Models 2 to 4 of concrete frame were provided with shear walls on different locations. Shear walls were provided in the models 6 to 8 of steel frame, on the same locations as for models 2 to 4. The various concrete and steel frame models 1 to 8 were analysed and compared for various parameters through linear static analysis method considering seismic effect.
It has been observed that the values of storey displacement in concrete shear wall are more than steel plate shear walls (SPSW) while the values of storey stiffness in steel plate shear wall are more than concrete shear wall. When compared all 8-models for the best location in the building, the steel plate shear wall (SPSW) provided at the middle (tubular form) and corner of the building has been found the best. It has been concluded that steel plate shear wall system is comparatively more suitable than concrete shear wall system in a building.
-
REFERENCES
-
-
-
Peter Timler, Carlos E.Ventura and Reza Anjam (1998), Experimental and analytical studies of steel plate shear walls as applied to the design of tall buildings, The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 1998, Volume-7, PP. 233249.
-
Astaneh-Asl (2001) Seismic Behaviour and Design of Steel Shear Walls, SEAONC Seminar, November 2001, San Francisco. PP. 1-18.
-
Burcu Burak (2013), Effect of shear wall area to floor area ratio on the seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete buildings Journal of Structural Engineering, 2013, Volume-139, PP. 1928-1937.
-
Sumit Pawah (2014), Steel plate shear wall – a lateral load resisting system International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering IJETAE,2014, PP. 244- 252
-
Chandra Shekar and Raj Shekar (2015), Analysis and design of multi storied building by using Etabs software International journal of scientific research, 2015, Volume-4, ISSN No. 2277-8179.
-
R.Resmi and S.Yamini Roja (2016), A review on performance of shear wall International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 2016, Volume-11, ISSN NO. 0973-4562, PP. 369-370.