Assessing Level of Service for Highways in a New Metropolitan City

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV4IS040381

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

  • Open Access
  • Total Downloads : 498
  • Authors : Ganesh Pawar, Dr. Bhalachandra Khode, Prof. Sujesh Ghodmare
  • Paper ID : IJERTV4IS040381
  • Volume & Issue : Volume 04, Issue 04 (April 2015)
  • DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV4IS040381
  • Published (First Online): 08-04-2015
  • ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
  • Publisher Name : IJERT
  • License: Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Text Only Version

Assessing Level of Service for Highways in a New Metropolitan City

Ganesh Pawar

Civil Engineering Department

G. H. Raisoni College of Engineering Nagpur, India,440016

Dr. Bhalachandra Khode

Civil Engineering Department

G. H. Raisoni College of Engineering Nagpur, India, 440016

Prof. Sujesh Ghodmare

Civil engineering Department

G. H. Raisoni College of ngineering Nagpur, India, 440016

AbstractThe Level Of Service is a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, and their perception by drivers or passengers. The present research primarily aims at analyzing the level of services for different highways of a new metropolitan city using HCS-2000. Continued efforts are being focussed towards the assessment of Level Of Service at intersections, although it is necessary to assess the Level of Service at highway mid-block sections. The research presented here mainly aims at assessment of the level of service at highway midblock sections. The field survey is carried out to capture the traffic volume as well as the corresponding average spot speed of traffic through manual as well as videography technique. The level of service F is not observed anywhere since tha analysis is carried out at the mid block sections rather than at the intersections.

KeywordsLevel Of Service; Volume To Capacity Ratio; Average Spot Speed; Videography Technique.

INTRODUCTION

Metropolitan cities in India are witnessing for very high rate of population growth, consequently the rise in traffic in their transport corridors. The concern about the deterioration in the LOS is due to the uncontrolled growth of vehicular traffic volume, shortfall of supply side of transportation capacity, resulting in the additional delay, extra fuel consumption, user cost etc. Therefore it is necessary to assess the level of service of highways passing through the metropolitan cities over a period of time in order to adopt the various transport improvement programmes on short as well as long term basis for improving the level of service. In most of the cases , performance of the highway is expressed in terms of level of service, which is a method proposed to illustrate traffic conditions for an existing or proposed transportation facility operating under current or projected traffic demand. The highway capacity manual (HCM) defines highway level of service as a a qualitative measure describing operational conditions within a traffic stream, as perceived by the motorists[Transportation Research Board (TRB) 2000]. Level of Service describes these operating conditions in terms

of the parameters such as speed and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, comfort, convenience and safety.The six level of services are proposed in the latest version of the HCM ranging from A to F, with A representing best operating condition [Free Flow] and F as worst [Forced flow or breakdown flow].The assessment of the level of service using the speed and volume to capacity ratio as the measure of effectiveness has been demonstrated through the application of HCS-2000 software for three different highways. The objective of this research is the identification and analysis of highway level of service in relation to avg. spot speed and corresponding traffic volume. A lot of research work is carried to assess the level of service at the intersections but very less research work is carried out to assess it at mid block sections, so it is necessary to assess the level of service at highway mid block sections so that the improvement in the level of service at mid blocks will automatically reflect in the improvement in the level of service at the intersections.

Antony Stathopoulos [1] proposed an approach for estimating the duration of congestion on a given road section and the probability that, given its onset, the congestion will end during the following time period. . Rahman et. al. [2] developed a model for LOS using passing-overtaking manoeuvres in terms of total traffic volume and percent of rickshaw. M.V.LR Anjaneyulu et.al. [3] studied the relationship of congestion with speed variation and quantified the congestion using speed variation also he defined the 5 Level of Services from A to E based on the coefficient of variation of speed. Chetan R. Patel [4] proposed an empirical investigation in the behavior of mixed traffic stream speed and flow rate on an access controlled urban arterial in Surat city in Gujarat state of India. Eleonora Papadimitriou [5] analyzed the perceived highway level of service in relation to drivers personal characteristics and traffic conditions. The results confirm that the relationship between perceived level of service and traffic conditions has a piecewise linear form with significant differences in slopes and breakpoints. Milica Selmic [6] developed a model for the best strategy selection

from transportation and drivers point of view for transportation demand management aimed to reduce the congestion. Ning Wu et.al. [7] developed a model which takes into account the total segment of freeway merge diverge and weaving as an entire object. A combined volume- capacity ratio is used for determining the LOS of the total sections. Indrajit Ghosh [8] summarized the evolution on the research of determining the level of service of two lane roads and provide discussion for future directions pertinent to Indian mixed traffic situation. Takashil Sakai et.al [9] proposed a simplified method for measuring driver satisfaction (CS) in real time with observable data and proposed six level of services in accordance with HCM based on the customers satisfaction. Maitra et. al. [10] proposed development of LOS criteria based on congestion, 10 levels of service have been proposed depending upon the percentage of congestion, with 9 in stable zone as A-E, and one representing an unstable operation as F. The model is applicable to undivided urban streets with relatively high proportions of rickshaws. In this context, present study is carried out to determine the flow behaviour under mixed traffic conditions and also to establish LOS for the prevailing traffic conditions.

HCS-2000 software. The level of services are computed for morning peak periods as well as morning off peak periods, However the variation of avg. spot speed against volume is depicted by the graphs.

Table 2: Level of Service for MSH-248 (Morning peak hour)

Time interval (Min.)

Flow (q) (PCU/hr)

Avg.Spot speed (Km/hr)

Density (k) (PCU/km/ln)

LOS as per HCS-

2000

0-5 min

2688

40.91

66

D

5-10 min

2736

39.82

69

D

10-15 min

2364

45.37

53

D

15-20 min

2364

45.37

53

D

20-25 min

2448

44.06

56

D

25-30 min

2808

38.72

73

E

30-35 min

2460

43.93

56

D

35-40 min

2232

47.56

47

D

40-45 min

2472

43.28

58

D

45-50 min/p>

2376

44.58

54

D

50-55 min

2256

47.34

48

D

55-60 min

2328

46.51

51

D

Table 3: Level of Service for MSH-248 (Morning off peak hour)

Time

interval (Min.)

Flow (q) (PCU/hr)

Avg.Spot

speed (Km/hr)

Density (k) (PCU/km/ln)

LOS as

per HCS- 2000

15-20 min

2088

50.55

42

C

20-25 min

2640

41.08

65

D

25-30 min

2292

46.85

49

D

30-35 min

1920

51.42

38

C

35-40 min

2208

48.02

46

D

40-45 min

2256

47.34

48

D

45-50 min

2076

50.69

41

D

50-55 min

1932

51.34

38

C

55-60 min

2184

48.20

46

D

0-5 min

2268

47.09

49

D

5-10 min

1980

51.09

39

C

10-15 min

2160

49.21

44

D

METHDOLOGY

Three highways (MSH-248, MSH-255, MSH-260) were selected for assessment of level of service. Level of service of each highway section is assessed by using HCS-2000 Software. Traffic surveys are conducted to collect the data of vehicular volume and speed on the selected road sections for different highways passing through the metropolitan city. Inventory surveys are carried out for gathering the primary information regarding road surface characteristics, number of lanes, lane width etc. On the basis of inventory surveys the detailed surveys are planned. The surveys are conducted on normal working days during morning and evening peak as well as off peak hours covering wide range of traffic conditions and flow behaviour.

Table 1: Roadway Features and Data Collection Techniques.

Name of road (1)

Number of lanes per direction

(2)

Carriageway width per direction (m) (3)

Surface type (4)

Data Collection technique (5)

MSH-

255

2

7.48

Bitumen

Videography

MSH-

248

2

7.50

Bitumen

Videography

MSH- 260

3

10.42

Bitumen

Videography

About the HCS-2000

The Highway Capacity Software (HCS-2000) adopts the procedure given in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM- 2000) for analyzing roadway capacity and determining level of service (LOS) for signalized intersection, urban roads (Arterials), freeways, Multilane highways. The Level of services for different highways are computed by using the

Table 4: Level of Service for MSH-255 (Morning peak hour)

Time

interval (Min.)

Flow (q) (PCU/hr)

Avg.Spot

speed (Km/hr)

Density (k) (PCU/km/ln)

LOS as

per HCS- 2000

0-5 min

2412

36.87

66

D

5-10 min

2436

36.50

67

D

10-15 min

1920

41.05

47

C

15-20 min

2136

40.18

54

D

20-25 min

2724

36.04

76

D

25-30 min

2460

36.33

68

D

30-35 min

3240

32.39

101

E

35-40 min

3120

33.41

94

E

40-45 min

2844

35.00

82

E

45-50 min

3096

34.10

91

E

50-55 min

2340

37.09

64

D

55-60 min

2148

39.58

55

D

Table 5: Level of Service for MSH-255 (Evening off peak hour)

Time

interval (Min.)

Flow (q) (PCU/hr)

Avg.Spot

speed (Km/hr)

Density (k) (PCU/km/ln)

LOS as

per HCS- 2000

0-5 min

1404

47.81

30

C

5-10 min

1152

49.55

24

B

10-15 min

1572

46.93

34

C

15-20 min

1236

48.59

26

B

20-25 min

1716

44.02

39

C

25-30 min

1560

47.03

34

C

30-35 min

1488

47.46

32

C

35-40 min

2064

40.89

51

D

40-45 min

1872

41.68

45

C

45-50 min

1596

46.20

35

C

50-55 min

1524

47.21

33

C

55-60 min

1620

45.98

36

C

Table 6: Level of Service for MSH-260 (Morning peak hour)

Generalized Relationship Between Different Flow Parameters

The relationship between the various flow parameters (speed, flow, density) for MSH-248 is depicted here. The Speed will decrease with increase in traffic volume. As the flow increases the density will increase.

80

70

Average Spot Speed u (Km/hr)

60

50

40

.94

006x + 68

987

-06×2 – 0.

R² = 0.

y = -2E

30

20

Time interval (Min.)

Flow (q) (PCU/hr)

Avg.Spot speed (Km/hr)

Density (k) (PCU/km/ln)

LOS as per HCS 2000

0-5 min

1212

47.58

26

B

5-10 min

1416

46.82

31

C

10-15 min

1284

47.43

28

B

15-20 min

1824

41.44

45

C

20-25 min

1752

42.59

42

C

25-30 min

1632

44.00

38

C

30-35 min

1644

43.87

38

C

35-40 min

1632

44.00

38

C

40-45 min

1692

43.39

39

C

45-50 min

1644

43.87

38

C

50-55 min

1908

40.97

47

C

55-60 min

1752

42.59

42

C

10

0

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

Flow v (PCU/hr)

Time interval

(Min.)

Flow (q) (PCU/hr)

Avg.Spot speed

(Km/hr)

Density (k) (PCU/km/ln)

LOS as per HCS

2000

0-5 min

1488

46.06

33

C

5-10 min

1596

44.55

36

C

10-15 min

1344

47.00

29

B

15-20 min

1284

47.43

28

B

20-25 min

1800

41.69

44

C

25-30 min

1440

46.59

31

C

30-35 min

1512

45.11

34

C

35-40 min

1452

46.46

32

C

40-45 min

1608

44.09

39

C

45-50 min

1488

46.06

33

C

50-55 min

1320

47.09

29

B

55-60 min

1620

44.05

37

C

Table 7: Level of Service for MSH-260 (Morning off peak hour)

Fig.1 Variation of Average Spot Speed with Flow

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

y = -0.370×2 + 65.22x – 20.05

R² = 0.998

500

0

0

20

40

60

80

Density k (PCU/km/l)

y = -0.418x + 67.61

R² = 0.986

30

20

80

70

60

50

40

Flow v (PCU/hr)

Average Spot Speed u (Km/hr)

Fig. 2 Variation of Flow with Density.

10

0

0

20

40

60

80

Density k (PCU/km/l)

Fig. 3 Variation Average Spot Speed with Density.

CONCLUSIONS

The Level of service varies with the traffic composition as well as with traffic volume. Based on the analysis done for different highways and comparative studies thereof the following conclusions have been drawn

  • The results obtained using HCS-2000 clearly reflects that the deterioration in LOS is due to the increase in traffic volume and decrease in avg. spot speed.

  • The traffic flow data collected at the mid-block sections of four lane highways are analysed to determine the LOS under mixed traffic condition. The present study demonstrates the effect of volume and avg. spot speed on LOS.

  • For MSH-248 table 2 indicates that most of the vehicles perceives LOS D during morning Peak hour however during morning off peak hours both LOS C and LOS D are observed

  • For MSH-255 the table 4 reflects that LOS D and LOS E are observed during morning peak hour indicating considerable amount of loss to the freedom of manoeuvre, and is a consequence of increase in traffic volume and reduction in avg. spot speed. However for evening off peak hour LOS C is observed most frequently over a time.

  • For MSH-260 the variation of LOS over a peak and off peak hour is negligible and LOS B and LOS C are predominant.

  • The comparative analysis for above three highways signifies that the supply side (Lane Width) of the transportation system affects directly to the LOS of highways.

  • The Level of service F is not observed at any of the mid block sections since the traffic data was collected at the mid-block sections of the highways rather than at the intersections.

However the scope of this paper is limited to the assessment of level of service for morning peak hours and off peak hours. Since the level of service is a function of temporal as well as spatial variation of traffic flow as well as traffic speed therefore it is necessary to assess the level of service over a period of time in order to mitigate the congestion (if any) and provide the long term or short term remedial measures for the mitigation of congestion.

REFERENCES

1] Antony Stathopoulus. Modelling duration of urban traffic congestion J.Transp. Eng., 128,587-590.2002

2] Mizanur Rehman et.al. A study on passing overtaking characteristics and level of service of heterogenous traffic stream JEASTS Vol-06, pp. 1471-1483, 2005

3] M.V.L.R. Anjaneyulu.et.al Modelling congestion on urban roads using speed profile data J. Of IRC Paper. No 549. 2009

4] Chetan r. Patel. Capacity and LOS for urban arterial road in Indian mixed traffic condition Procedia social and behavioral sciences 48, 527-534. 2012

5] Eleonora Papadimitriou. Perceived Level Of Service, Driver and Traffic Characteristics: Piecewise Linear model J. Transp.Eng., 136, 887-894 2010

6] Milica Selmic et.al Model for reducing traffic volume: Case study of Belgrade, Serbia J.Transp.Eng., 140. 2014.

7] Ning Wu.et.al A new model for level of service of freeway, merge and diverge, and weaving segments Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences 16, 151-161. 2011

8] Indrajit Ghosh et.al. Operational Performance measure for Two Lane Roads: An Assessment of Methodological Alternatives Procedia social and behavioral sciences 104 (2013) 440-448.

9] Takashil Sakai et.al. New Measure of the Level of Service for Basic Expressway Segments Incorporating Customer Satisfaction Procedia social and behavioral sciences 16 (2011) 57-68.

10] Sikdar, P. K Maitra, B., Dhingra S. L., Modelling Congestion on urban roads and assessing level of service Jornal of transportation engineering Vol. 25, ASCE, 508-513.

11] Transportation Research Board (TRB) 2000. Highway Capacity manual, National Research Council, Washington D. C.

12] IRC-64: 1990 Guidelines for capacity of roads in rural areas (FirstRevision)

Leave a Reply