- Open Access
- Authors : Sujina Sahib S
- Paper ID : IJERTV10IS060183
- Volume & Issue : Volume 10, Issue 06 (June 2021)
- Published (First Online): 18-06-2021
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Assessing the Torsional Response of Elevated Water Tank with Amended Bracings
Sujina Sahib S
M tech Student [Structural Engineering] Dept of Civil Engineering
Younus College of Engineering and Technology Kollam, India
AbstractElevated tanks are important structures in storing vital products such as petroleum as well as water. Elevated storage tanks are commonly used to secure constant water supply from longer distance under the effect of gravitational force. They are constructed in such a way that it's greater portion of their weight is concentrated at an elevation. Torsional failure of elevated water tanks in past earthquakes has highlighted the importance of this problem.
Modelling and analysis of elevated water tank should be done using ETAB Software. Seismic Response Spectrum, Equivalent Static Analysis and modal analysis were conducted. Different staging configurations consist of Staging with different altered longitudinal bracings are provided. Through this study an effective approach to reduce torsional effect must be formulated. Tank responses including Local Torsion, Global Torsion will also be calculated.
Keywords Elevated tanks, bracings, Local Torsion, Global Torsion , ETAB Software
-
INTRODUCTION
Water tanks are one of the most important lifeline structures. In most of the cities and rural areas, water tanks forms an integral part of water supply scheme. Types are underground water tanks, ground supporting water tanks and elevated storage water tanks. Elevated water tanks are mostly used .The elevated water tanks are also known as over head supply reservoir (OHSR) , elevated supply reservoir (ESR) etc. To secure constant water supply from longer distance under the effect of gravitational force, the elevated water tanks are necessary.
They have low ductility and energy absorbing capacity as compared to the conventional buildings. They get heavily damaged during earthquake due to the fluid-structure interactions. Presence of heavy roof top masses like water tanks increases the seismic forces in the members of a building. They constructed in such a way that a greater portion of their weight is concentrated at an elevation. So seismic safety of liquid storage tanks is of considerable importance. Damage to these structures during strong ground motions may lead to fire or other hazardous events. Reinforced concrete water tanks can be made economical, monolithic and watertight by their design and construction. Different types of bracings configurations can be provided to the staging for adequate resistance of seismic forces.
-
OBJECTIVE
To find out the torsional behavior of the elevated water tank by altering the longitudinal geometry of the braces.
-
METHODOLOGY
-
MODELLING
TABLE I. DESIGN DATA OF WATERTANK
(Patel et al, 2017)
SL.NO
COMPONENT
VALUES
1
Top slab
150 mm
2
Bottom slab
200 mm
3
230mmx230mm
150 mm
4
Height of staging
15 m
5
Height of container
5 m
6
Dimension of tank
6 x 6 m
7
Zone factor
0.36 (V)
8
Importance factor
1.5 for water tank
9
Reduction Factor
5 (SMRF)
10
Type of soil
Medium soil
11
Bracing type
X bracing
12
Beam
230mm x 300mm
13
Column
300mm x 300mm
14
Bracing
230mm x 230mm
Type
Value
Source
Basic wind speed (Vb)
50 m/s
Clause 5.2
Probability factor or risk coefficient (k1)
1.06
Clause 5.2.1
Terrain, height and structure size factor (k2)
1.07
Clause 5.2.2
Topography factor (k3)
1.0
Clause 5.2.3
Structure class
B
Clause 5.3.2.2
Type
Value
Source
Basic wind speed (Vb)
50 m/s
Clause 5.2
Probability factor or risk coefficient (k1)
1.06
Clause 5.2.1
Terrain, height and structure size factor (k2)
1.07
Clause 5.2.2
Topography factor (k3)
1.0
Clause 5.2.3
Structure class
B
Clause 5.3.2.2
TABLE II. WIND LOADS (IS 875 PART 3)
Fig.1. Plan, Elevation and 3d view of water tank
A. Modification of Bracing Geometry
In the present study modelling of 8 different types of altered longitudinal geometry of the braces. Only depth of the bracings are varying .Width remains the same. Length of bracings provided is 4.24m . Dimensions of large cross section provided is 230x230mm . Dimensions of small cross section provided is 230×76.67mm (That is 1/3 rd of the depth).
In the present study one normal bracing with 230×230 mm uniform cross section and 8 altered longitudinal geometrical bracings are modelled and analysed. From the 8 models ,All the models are symmetrical bracings .From this, 4 models (B1 to B4) are designed in such a way that it is divided equally into three portions for altering the depth and in case of B5to B8 bracings they divided in to 3 portions and the middle portion again divides equally,so total of 4 portions for altering the depth.
B1
B5
B6
B7
B8
Fig. 2. Altered longitudinal geometry of the braces
-
ANALYSIS
-
Equivalent Static Analysis
The equivalent static lateral force method is a simplified technique to substitute the effect of dynamic loading of an expected earthquake by a static force distributed laterally on a structure for design purposes.
As per IS 1893:2002, Torsion should be considered when ratio of maximum story drift to average storey drift of the structure is more than 1.2
.
TABLE III. DRIFT RATIO
Model Id
Max drift/Avg Drift
NB
1.332
B1
1.314
B2
1.324
B3
1.308
B4
1.319
B5
1.319
B6
1.308
B7
1.327
B8
1.308
1.32
B2
B3
0.56
1.78
0.98 0.97
1.77
0.33
1.79
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8
B4 Fig.3.Percentage Reduction In Torsion w.r.t Normal Bracing
For all models the maximum story drift to average story drift is greater than 1.2. Model with norma bracing have maximum torsion. Model B3, B6 and B8 have the maximum reduction in torsion.
-
Modal Analysis
Modal analysis is used to determine the number of modes and corresponding mode shapes. Loads are applied as acceleration in X and Y direction. 12 number of modes are
The global torsion get reduced maximum for bracing B8. The torsion is less for bracings with least cross sectional area near the supports. The torsion is highest for bracing with largest cross sectional area near the support
-
Local Torsion
Local torsion refers to the torsion in each bracings.
76.07
taken for analysis (At mode 12, mass participation ratio is approximately 100%). The effective mass participation factor represents the percentage of the system mass that participates in a particular mode. It provides a measure of the energy contained within each resonant mode.
Type : Eigen Vector Modal Analysis
No. of modes = 17 at 99% mass participation
56.31
31.90
66.31
55.48
40.36
63.81
29.05
32 32 32
25.6
17.6 18.4
12.8
9.6
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8
Fig.6.Percentage Reduction In Local Torsion w.r.t Normal Bracing
The local torsion get reduced maximum for bracing B8. Model with normal bracing have maximum torsion .The torsion is less for bracings with least cross sectional area near the supports. The torsion is highest for bracing with
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8
Fig 4. Percentage Reduction in torsion w.r.t Normal Bracing
The time period at torsional mode get reduced maximum for bracing B3, B6 and B8. Model with normal bracing have maximum torsion. The torsion is less for bracings
largest cross sectional area near the support.
-
Brace Reactions
TORSION AXIAL FORCE
76.07
with least cross sectional area near the supports. The torsion is highest for bracing with largest cross sectional area near the support.
-
-
Response Spectrum Analysis
Response-spectrum analysis (RSA) is a linear-dynamic statistical analysis method which measures the contribution from each natural mode of vibration to indicate the likely
56.31
17.44
31.90
66.31
19.51
55.48
40.36
63.81
20.78
29.05
21.00
maximum seismic response of an essential elastic structure. Seismic Zone Factor = 0.36
9.03
11.40 13.43
7.54
Soil Type = II Damping Ratio = 50%
-
Global Torsion
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8
Fig.7.Percentage Decrease Of Axial force with respect To Normal Brace
TORSION SHEAR FORCE
71.17
55.07
77.77
70.62
60.64
76.12
53.18
84.21
56.31
47.69
66.31
55.48
35.90
40.36
63.81
76.07
39.49
31.90
22.56
26.15
31.79
30.26
30.26
29.05
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8
Fig.5.Percentage Reduction In Global Torsion w.r.t Normal Bracing
Global torsion refers to the torsion of the entire building.
5.64
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8
Fig.8.Percentage Decrease Of Shear force with respect To Normal Brace
TORSION BENDING MOMENT
76.07
-
P.L.N. Saroja and V. S. Rao, Comparative Study of Analysis of Elevated Water Tank Due To Earth Quake from Different Zones of Earth Quake, International Journal of Constructive Research in Civil Engineering, Volume 2, January 2016
-
A. N. Asati, Dr. M. S. Kadu, Seismic Investigation Of RCC
62.00
56.31
31.90
66.31
60.00
55.48
40.36
63.81
60.00
29.05
46.00
Elevated Water Tank For Different Types Of Staging Patterns, International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT) Volume 14, August 2014
-
G. P. Deshmukh, A. S. Patekhede, analysis of elevated water storage structure using different staging system, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Volume 9, August 2016
-
P.I.N. Saroja,Vanka. Srinivasa Rao, Comparative Study Of
20.00 22.00
15.00
2.00
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7 B8
Fig.9.Percentage Decrease Of Bending moment with respect To Normal Brace
Brace Axial force and shear force are proportional to brace torsion. For braces with less cross sectional area near the supports, bending moment decreased by 15 to 46%.
-
-
-
CONCLUSION
Staging with same cross-sectional area throughout the bracing have maximum torsion. The torsion is less for bracings with least cross-sectional area near the supports. Brace Axial force and shear force are proportional to brace torsion. For braces with less cross-sectional area near the supports, bending moment decreased by 15 to 46%. By reducing the cross-sectional area near the support, reinforcement and cost of the bracing can be reduced
REFERENCES
-
C. N. Patel, S. N. Vaghela, H. S. Patel, Sloshing Response Of Elevated Water Tank Over Alternate Column Proportionality International Journal of Advanced Engineering Technology,
Volume 3 Issue IV Oct.-Dec.-2012
-
V. Varur, S. B. Vankudre, P. Prabhavati ., Optimization of Water Tank The International Journal Of Science & Technology,
Volume 2 Issue 7 July-2014
-
N. J. Singh, I. Mohammad, Design Analysis & Comparison Of Intze Type Water Tank For Different Wind Speed And Seismic Zones As Per Indian Codes, International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, Volume: 04 Issue: 09 September- 2015
-
S. Wankhede, P. J. Salunke, N. G. Gore, Cost Optimization of Elevated Circular Water Storage Tank, The International Journal Of Engineering And Science, Volume 4, Issue 2015
-
H. Mohammed, Optimization of water storage tank, International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research,
Volume 3, Issue 4 April 2011
-
F. Asari, M. G. Vanza, Structural Control System For Elevated Water Tank, International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Studies, Vol. 1 Issue 3 April-June-2012
-
A. N. Asati, M. S. Kadu, S. R. Asati, Seismic Analysis And Optimization Of RC Elevated Water Tank Using Various Staging Patterns International Journal Of Engineering Research And Application, Volume 6 Issue 7(Part-1) July 2016
-
S. A. Barakat, S. Altoubat, Optimization of Elevated Water Tank The International Journal Of Science & Technology Volume 2 Issue 7 July 2009
-
S. Siddiqui, B. K. Singh and P. Thakur, Performance based Seismic Analysis on RCC Framed Elevated Circular Tanks with Flat and Domical Bases, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, Volume 9, August 2016
-
Swathi C. Naik and M.S. Bhandiwad, Seismic Analysis and Optimization of a Rectangular Elevated Water Tank, International Journal of Man Machine Interface, Volume 4, July 2016
Elevated Water Tank Due To Earth Quake From Different Zones International Journal Of Construction Research In Civil Engineering, Volume 2, Issue 1,2016, Issn2454-8693
-
Latesh T. Patil, Rajashekar Tailkoti, Comparision Of Seismic Behavior Of Rectangular Elevated Water Tank International Journal For Scientific Research And Development, Volume 3,Issue 05,2015, Issn (Online):2321-0613