
- Open Access
- [post-views]
- Authors : Dr. Praseeda E, Dr. Ravi D R, Ashmita Das, Aiswarya C S, Evan Raj Subba, Pankaj Kanojiya
- Paper ID : IJERTCONV10IS10024
- Volume & Issue : ACME – 2022 (Volume 10 – Issue 10)
- Published (First Online): 13-08-2022
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License:
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Assessment of Air Quality in Bangalore Before, During & After Covid-19 Lockdown
1Dr. Praseeda E 2Dr. Ravi D R 3Ashmita Das 4Aiswarya C S 5Evan Raj Subba and 6Pankaj Kanojiya
3,4,5,6UG Students, Department of Civil Engineering, R R Institute of Technology, Bengaluru, India
1Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, R R Institute of Technology, Bengaluru, India.
2Environmental Officer, CPCB, Bengaluru, India.
AbstractAir pollution is the presence of any solid, liquid or gaseous substances in the atmospherein such a concentration as may be or tend to be injurious to human beings or other living being or creature or plants or property or environment. The major air pollutants are particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5 etc.), Oxides of nitrogen and Sulphur (NOx, SOx) and Ozone. A machine containing filters is used to collect dust sample at various locations around Bangalore. The samples are then sent to a laboratory to be tested for PM10, PM2.5, SOx and NOx. The test results are then used to calculate the Air Quality Index for respective locations. The data for various phases of lockdown was requested from Central Pollution Control Board. As per Indian National Air Quality Standards, average value is 60 for PM2.5, 100 for PM10, 80 for NO2 and 80 for SO2. The values are expressed in µg/m3. From the tests results it was found that the air pollution had significantly decreased during the lockdown and there was an increase before and after the lockdown. The air around residential areas showed significantly less pollution compared to commercial and industrial area during Lockdown period.
KeywordsAir pollution; particulate matter; covid-19; lockdown; air quality index.
-
INTRODUCTION
According to World health Organization (WHO), Air pollution occurs due to, release of toxic Pollutants into the atmosphere beyond such concentration which can cause harm to human health and the planet. Every year, Air Pollution causes approximately 7 million deaths all around the world. Currently, Nine out of ten human beings are breath air which exceeds the WHOs standards.
In case of developing and under developed countries the air quality is considered as crucial. Air pollution is a serious threat to the human being, on account not only of its impact on public and individual health due to increasing illness. According to Rana et al. (2021), the effect of covid-19 lockdowns on pollutant concentrations in chaina was examined by synthesizing the reported evidence. The covid-19 was seriously affected public health worldwide and caused millions of infections and deaths, especially among the elderly. To prevent the spread of this infectious disease, the Chinese government took a nationwide contingency plan to restrict human activities. During lockdown, economic activities were reduced dramatically and people were isolated in their homes. Lockdown measures resulted in the improvement in air quality, as air pollutants such as particulate matter or less (PM10), less (PM2.5), SO2, CO, NO2 decreased significantly. To reduce or stop the spreading of the virus, the
Indian government has announced complete lockdown except emergency services, pharmacies, medical shops etc, in that phase various transport was fully shut (except emergency services)during that time there was much more decrease was there in air pollution, they came up with a result which is the decrease of air pollution between the phases, it was examined by Chaudhary et al.(2021), in New Delhi, This research work was done by Chinnaswamy et al.(2016) in Bangalore one of the fastest growing and fastest development city in India, They have done a Time Series Analysis of 2006-2013, The have dont the critical analysis from 6 stations, and the air was assessed for 48 hours in a week, and they have come with an result that Bangalore has or is experiencing various levels of pollution with some areas having either high or critical levels of one or more pollutants. Researchers like, Jaeja et al. (2020), Coker et al. (2020), Malmqvist et al. (2018), Saud and Pandel (2018), Singh and Chauhan (2021), Selvam et al. (2020), Dasgupta and Srikanth (2020), Sekhara Rao Kolluru et al. (2020), Srivastava and Kumar (2019), Munappy (2018), Haque and Singh (2017), Gope et al. (2021), Chinnaswamy et al. (2016) conducted various studies to monitor air quality index in various parts of the world including Bangalore. Most of these researches shows that, PM25, PM10, NO2& CO particular related to industrial activates & traffic, indicate a reduction during covid -19 outbreak.
-
METHODOLOGY
The study was carried out by following the methodology as described below;
Collecting Secondary Data
From Organization Like
CPCB SPCB
Assess the air quality at different locations
Secondary data collection
-
Secondary data means data that are already available i.e., they refer to the data which have already been collected and studied by somebody else. When the researcher uses secondary data, then he has to look into various sources from where he can obtain them.
-
Secondary data is collected from government & various organizations such as SPCB (State Pollution Control Board) CPCB (Central Pollution Control Board) and other organizations.
-
These data will be assessed and used to find AQI of various locations.
-
-
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The limits of Air Quality Index value for for PM2.5 is 40 , PM10 is 60, SO2 is 50 , and NO2 is 50, and the AQI value for all is 67. The data collected from the field with the use of various filters. With an interval of 15 days, AQI values are calculates for the following locations:
-
Jayanagar
-
Hombegowda Nagar
-
Central Silk Boar (CSB)
-
Peenya
The selection of the locations are based on the fact that, they fall under our required category that is one being Residential, the other being Commercial, and Industrial as well and compared them with each other to see the differences in air quality.
Table:1 Limited value of PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2
Parameters |
Standard value |
AQI |
PM2.5 |
40 |
67 |
PM10 |
60 |
|
SO2 |
50 |
|
NO2 |
50 |
15 Days Data of all the 4 station i.e Central Silk Board(CSB), Peenya, Jayanagar, HomebayGowda are submitted as below
A. Jayanagar(1/09/201-1/02/2022)
1. Pre-Lockdown(1/09/2019- 29/02/2020)
EXAMPLE Table:2 Showing air quality index during pre- lockdown period from 1/09/2019-16/09/2019
200
100
0
1/09/201
16/09/20
1/10/201
16/10/20
1/11/201
16/11/20
1/12/201
16/12/20
1/01/202
16/01/20
1/02/202
16/02/20
Fig. 1 Showing Air Quality Index from 1/09/2019-29/02/2020 2. 1st Lockdown(22/03/2020- 2/05/2020)
Example Table:3 Showing air quality index during pre- lockdown period from 22/03/2020-6/04/2020
Sl |
Parameters |
Duration(Date) |
of all parameter |
Average |
AQI |
1 |
PM 2.5 |
22/03/2020- 6/04/2020 |
429.33 |
28.62 |
50 |
2 |
PM10 |
745.19 |
49.67 |
||
3 |
SO2 |
3.08 |
1.54 |
||
4 |
NO2 |
247.03 |
16.46 |
Fig. 2 Showing air quality index during 1st lockdown period from 22/03/2020-02/05/2020
50
40
30
20
10
0
3. 2nd Lockdown 27/04/2021- 21/06/2021
Sl |
Parameters |
Duration (Date) |
of all parameter |
Average |
AQI |
1 |
PM 2.5 |
27/04/2021- 12/05/2021 |
463.99 |
30.93 |
52 |
2 |
PM10 |
769.12 |
51.27 |
||
3 |
SO2 |
84.7 |
5.64 |
||
4 |
NO2 |
370.43 |
24.69 |
Example Table 4 Showing air quality index during 2nd lockdown period from 27/04/2021-12/05/2021
Sl |
Parameters |
Duration (Date) |
of all parameter |
Average |
AQI |
1 |
PM 2.5 |
1/09/2019- 16/09/2019 |
191.48 |
12.76 |
38 |
2 |
PM10 |
563.5 |
37.56 |
||
3 |
SO2 |
49.71 |
3.31 |
||
4 |
NO2 |
269.93 |
17.99 |
60
40
20
0
Fig. 3 Showing air quality index during 2nd lockdown period from27/04/2021-21/062021
4. Post-Lockdown (1/08/2021-1/02/2022)
Sl |
Parameters |
Duration (Date) |
Sum of all parameter |
Average |
AQI |
1 |
PM 2.5 |
1/08/2021- 16/08/2021 |
300.71 |
20.04 |
38 |
2 |
PM10 |
574.25 |
38.28 |
||
3 |
SO2 |
88.78 |
5.91 |
||
4 |
NO2 |
448.32 |
29.88 |
Example Table 5 Showing air quality index during Post- lockdown period from 1/08/2021-16/08/2021
100
80
60
40
20
0
1/09/2019
16/09/201
1/10/2019
16/10/201
1/11/2019
16/11/201
1/12/2019
16/12/201
1/01/2020
16/01/202
1/02/2020
16/02/202
Fig 5 Showing air quality index during Pre-lockdown period from 01/09/2019-29/02/2020
2. 1st Lockdown (22/3/2020- 2/5/2020)
Sl |
Parameters |
Duration(D ate) |
Sum of all parameter |
Average |
AQI |
1 |
PM 2.5 |
22/3/2020- 6/4/2020 |
456.25 |
30.41 |
59 |
2 |
PM10 |
882.76 |
58.85 |
||
3 |
SO2 |
171.14 |
11.4 |
||
4 |
NO2 |
112.06 |
7.47 |
Example Table 7 Showing air quality index during 1st lockdown period from 22/3/2020-6/4/2020
120
100
80
60
40
20
1/08/2021-
16/08/2021
1/09/2021-
16/09/2021
1/10/2021-
16/10/2021
16/10/2021
16/11/2021
1/12/2021-
16/12/2021
1/01/2022-
16/01/2022
0
Fig.4 Showing air quality index during post-lockdown period from 01/08/2021-01/02/2022
-
Hombegowda Nagar
1. Pre Lockdown(1/9/2019- 29/2/2020)
Sl
Parameters
Duration (Date)
Sum of all parameter
Average
AQI
1
PM 2.5
1/9/2019-
16/9/2019
109.93
7.32
29
2
PM10
434.84
28.98
3
SO2
159.65
10.64
4
NO2
107.59
7.17
Example Table 6 Showing air quality index during Pre- lockdown period from 1/9/2019-16/9/2019
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Fig 6 Showing air quality index during 1st lockdown period from 22/03/2020-02/05/2020
3. 2nd Lockdown 27/4/2021- 21/6/2021)
Example Table 8 Showing air quality index during 2nd lockdown period from 27/4/2021-12/5/2021
S
l
Parameters
Duration( Date)
Sum of all parameter
Average
AQI
1
PM 2.5
27/4/2021-
12/5/2021
275.09
22.92
61
2
PM10
728.34
60.69
3
SO2
84.62
7.05
4
NO2
144.36
12.03
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
70
60
50
40
30
1/09/2019-
16/09/201
1/10/2019-
16/10/201
1/11/2019-
16/11/201
1/12/2019-
16/12/201
1/01/2020-
16/01/202
1/02/2020-
16/02/202
20
10
0
Fig. 7 Showing air quality index during 2nd lockdown period from 27/04/2021-21/06/2021
4. Post Lockdown(1/8/2021- 2/2/2022)
Example Table 9 Showing air quality index during Post- lockdown period from 1/8/2021-16/8/2021
Fig 9 Showing air quality index during Pre-lockdown period from 01/09/2019-29/02/2020
2. 1st Lockdown(22/3/2020- 2/5/2020)
Sl
Parameters
Duration (Date)
Sum of all parameter
Average
AQI
1
PM 2.5
22/3/2020-
6/4/2020
375.34
25.02
52
2
PM10
774.84
51.65
3
SO2
35.41
2.36
4
NO2
110.68
7.37
Example Table 11 Showing air quality index during 1st lockdown period from 22/3/2020-6/4/2020
Sl
Parameters
Duration (Date)
Sum of all parameter
Average
AQI
1
PM 2.5
1/8/2021-
16/8/2021
321.72
21.44
42
2
PM10
627.01
41.8
3
SO2
103.8
6.92
4
NO2
189.17
12.61
60
50
40
100 30
80 20
60 10
40 0
20
1/08/2021-
16/08/202
1/09/2021-
16/9/202
1/10/2021-
16/10/202
16/10/202
16/11/202
1/12/2021-
16/12/202
1/01/2022-
16/01/202
0
Fig. 8 Showing air quality index during Post-lockdown period from 1/08/2021-01/02/2022
C. CSB(1/9/2019- 29/2/2020)
-
Pre Lockdown
-
Exampke Table 10 Showing air quality index during Pre- lockdown period from 1/9/2019-16/9/2019
Fig 10 Showing air quality index during 1st lockdown period from 22/03/2020-02/05/2020
3. 2nd Lockdown (27/4/2021- 21/6/2021)
Sl |
Parameters |
Duration (Date) |
Sum of all parameter |
Average |
AQI |
1 |
PM 2.5 |
27/4/2021- 12/5/2021 |
291.43 |
22.41 |
56 |
2 |
PM10 |
726.85 |
55.91 |
||
3 |
SO2 |
40.97 |
3.15 |
||
4 |
NO2 |
265.82 |
20.44 |
Example Table 12 Showing air quality index during 2nd lockdown period from 27/4/2021-12/5/2021
Sl |
Parameters |
Duration (Date) |
Sum of all parameter |
Average |
AQI |
1 |
PM 2.5 |
1/9/2019- 16/9/2019 |
270.96 |
18.06 |
77 |
2 |
PM10 |
1150.7 |
76.71 |
||
3 |
SO2 |
23.99 |
1.59 |
||
4 |
NO2 |
454.7 |
30.31 |
80
60 80
40 60
20
0 40
20
1/09/2019-
16/09/2019-
1/10/2019-
16/10/2019-
1/11/2019-
16/11/2019-
1/12/2019-
16/12/2019-
1/01/2020-
16/01/2020-
1/02/2020-
16/02/2020-
0
Fig 11 Showing air quality index during 2nd lockdown period from 27/04/2021-21/06/2021
4. Post Lockdown (1/8/2021- 1/2/2022)
Sl |
Parameters |
Duration (Date) |
Sum of all parameter |
Average |
AQI |
1 |
PM 2.5 |
1/8/2021- 16/8/2021 |
216.57 |
14.43 |
77 |
2 |
PM10 |
1159.7 |
77.31 |
||
3 |
SO2 |
75.96 |
5.06 |
||
4 |
NO2 |
682.5 |
45.5 |
Example Table 13 Showing air quality index during Post lockdown period from 1/8/2021-16/8/2021
Fig 13 Showing air quality index during Pre lockdown period from 1/09/2019-29/02/2020
2. 1st Lockdown(22/3/2020- 2/5/2020)
Example Table 15 Showing air quality index during 1st lockdown period from 22/3/2020-6/4/2020
Sl |
Parameters |
Duration (Date) |
of all parameter |
Average |
AQI |
1 |
PM 2.5 |
22/3/2020- 6/4/2020 |
573.75 |
38.25 |
61 |
2 |
PM10 |
0 |
0 |
||
3 |
SO2 |
49.7 |
3.31 |
||
4 |
NO2 |
109.66 |
7.31 |
70
60
50
120 40
100 30
80 20
60 10
40 0
20
1/08/2021-
16/08/2021-
1/09/2021-
16/09/2021-
1/10/2021-
16/10/2021-
16/10/2021-
16/11/2021-
1/12/2021-
16/12/2021-
1/01/2022-
16/01/2022-
0
Fig 14 Showing air quality index during 1st lockdown period from 22/03/2020-2/05/2020
Fig 12 Showing air quality index during Post lockdown
3. 2nd
Lockdown (27/4/2021- 21/6/2021)
period from 1/08/2021-01/02/2022
D. Peenya (1/09/2019- 29/2/2020)
1. Pre Lockdown
Example Table 14 Showing air quality index during Pre lockdown period from 1/09/2019-16/9/2019
Sl |
Parameters |
Duration (Date) |
Sum of all parameter |
Average |
AQI |
1 |
PM 2.5 |
27/4/2021- 12/5/2021 |
629.54 |
41.96 |
73 |
2 |
PM10 |
1088.3 |
72.55 |
||
3 |
SO2 |
85.12 |
5.67 |
||
4 |
NO2 |
256.4 |
17.09 |
Example Table 16 Showing air quality index during 2nd lockdown period from 27/4/2021-12/5/2021
Sl |
Parameters |
Duration (Date) |
of all parameter |
Average |
AQI |
1 |
PM 2.5 |
1/09/2019- 16/9/2019 |
190.08 |
21.12 |
35 |
2 |
PM10 |
0 |
0 |
||
3 |
SO2 |
24.95 |
3.56 |
||
4 |
NO2 |
244.79 |
27.19 |
80
60
40
20
0
Fig 15 Showing air quality index during 2nd lockdown period from 27/04/2021-21/06/2021
4. Post Lockdown (1/8/2021- 1/2/2022)
Sl |
Parameters |
Duration (Date) |
Sum of all parameter |
Average |
AQI |
1 |
PM 2.5 |
1/8/2021- 16/8/2021 |
453.11 |
32.36 |
57 |
2 |
PM10 |
804.05 |
57.43 |
||
3 |
SO2 |
27.64 |
1.84 |
||
4 |
NO2 |
221.81 |
14.78 |
Example Table 17 Showing air quality index during Post lockdown period from 1/8/2021-16/8/2021
250
200
150
100
50
1/08/2021-
16/08/2021-
1/09/2021-
16/09/2021-
1/10/2021-
16/10/2021-
16/10/2021-
16/11/2021-
1/12/2021-
16/12/2021-
1/01/2022-
16/01/2022-
0
Fig 16 Showing air quality index during Post lockdown period from 1/08/2021-1/02/2022
CONCLUSION
The air quality index across the selected monitoring stations has shown reduced values during the lock down period. The AQI in residential area is very much less when compared to the commercial area and traffic junction during the lock down period. There is difference in AQI of pre Covid and during COVID, as most of the anthropogenic activities were stopped due to imposition of lock down by the State of Karnataka, especially the stoppage of vehicular movement within the city area. The AQI analysis indicates that there is a reduction of 26 to 65% in air pollutants at selected places of study spread across the study period. The post COVID AQI analysis reveals that, there is slight increase in the air pollutant concentration, especially concentration of PM10 and PM2.5 across different location of study area. The Pre covid scenario on air pollutant
concentration reveals that, the PM10 and PM 2.5 are higher than SO2 and NO2.
XII. REFERENCES
[1] Anitha Chinnaswamy, Maria Cecilia D.Galvez,Hewa Balisane,QuynhT.Nguyen,Raouf N.G.Naguib,Nigel Trod, Norlaily Yaacob, Gil Nonato C. Santos, Edgar A. Vallar, Mohyi Shaker, Nilmini Wickramasinghe, Tuan Nghia Ton(20),Air pollution in bangalore,India:an eight-years treand analysis, International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management,Vol.19,No.3,pp.177-197. [2] Bhuvan Saud1and Govinda Paudel1 (2018),The treat of Ambient Air Pollution in Kathmandu, Nepal, Journal of Environmental and Public Health, Vol.18, pp.45- 59. [3] Ebba Malmqvista,Ebba Lisberg Jensenb,Karin Westerbergb,Emilie Stroha,Ralf Rittnera,Susanna Gustafssonc,Marten Spannec,Henric Nilssonc,Anna Oudina,d(2018),Estimated health benefits of exhaust free transport in the city of Malmo, Southern Sweden,Vol.118,pp.78-85. [4] Eric s Coker, Laura Cavalli, Enrico Fabrizi, Gianni Guastella (2020),The effects of air pollution on COVID-19 Related Mortality in Northern Italy Environmental and resource Economics, Vol.76, pp.611-634. [5] Gayatri Munappy (2018),An analysis of air pollution and its impact on human population in Delhi, Vol.12, pp.623-640. [6] Min Jae Jua, b, Jaehyun Ohc, Yoon-Hyeong Choia (2020),Changes in air pollution levels after COVID-19 outbreak in Korea, Vol.750, pp.141-152. [7] Oludare Hakeem Adedeji, Olasumbo Oluwafunmilayo and Tope- Ajayi Opeyemi Oluwaseun (2016), Mapping of Traffic-Related Air Pollution Using GIS Techniques in Ijebu-Ode, Nigeria,Vol.48, No.1, pp.73-83
[8] Purnamita Dasgupta1, Kavitha Srikanth (2020),Reduce air pollution during COVID-19, Learning for sustainability from Indian cities, Vol.2, pp.271-282. [9] Ramesh P Singh and Akshansha Chauhan (2020),Impact of lockdown on air quality in India during COVID-19 pandemic, Air Quality, Atmosphere and Health, Vol.13, pp.921-928 [10] Rezwanul Hasan Rana1, Syed Afroz Keramat1, Jeff Gow1, 2(2021),ASystematic Literature Review of the Impact of COVID- 19NLockdowns on AirnQuality in China, Vol.21, pp.242-276. [11] Sadhan Gope1, Subhojit Dawn2, and Shreya Shree Das1 (2021),Effect ofCOVID-19 pandemic of air quality: a study based on Air Quality Index, Vol.3, pp.1- 20. [12] Selvam.S,Muthukumar.P, Venkatramanansenapathi, Priyadarsi D Roy, Jesuraja, Manikandabharath K R(2020),Effects of air quality in the industrialized Gujarat state of India, Science of Total Environment,Vol.2,pp.524-556.