Volume 14, Issue 03 (March 2025)

Blockchain for Security: Enhancing Data Integrity in Space Communications and Operations

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV14IS030165
Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication
Chinmay Mendse, Atharva Tiwari, 2025, Blockchain for Security: Enhancing Data Integrity in Space Communications and Operations, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY (IJERT) Volume 14, Issue 03 (March 2025),

Text Only Version

 

Blockchain for Security: Enhancing Data Integrity in Space Communications and Operations

Published by : http://www.ijert.org

International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)

ISSN: 2278-0181

Vol. 14 Issue 03, March-2025

Chinmay Mendse

Computer Science and Engineering Symbiosis Institute of Technology

Pune, India

 Atharva Tiwari

Computer Science and Engineering Symbiosis Institute of Technology

Pune, India

AbstractThis study, conducted in 2024, explores the potential of blockchain technology to enhance data integrity in space communications and operations. With the growing complexity and reliance on satellite networks for global connectivity, Earth observation, and deep space exploration, ensuring tamper-proof and secure communication is critical. The research proposes a blockchain-based framework that integrates satellites, ground stations, and spacecraft as decentralized nodes, addressing existing security challenges such as data tampering, unauthorized access, and signal jamming. Based consensus combining Proof of Stake (PoS) algorithm with Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) processes is introduced to optimize security and latency in space environments. The feasibility of the framework is evaluated through simulations and case studies, demonstrating its effectiveness in mitigating space-specific threats, with practical implications for missions such as NASAs Artemis program. The study concludes that blockchain offers a transformative solution for securing space communications and urges stakeholders to pilot such technologies for future space operations.

Index TermsBlockchain Technology, Space Communications, Data Integrity, Satellite Networks, Cybersecurity in Space, Consensus Mechanism, Proof of Stake (PoS), Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT), Quantum-Resistant Cryptography, Space-based IoT

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Communication systems as extending space have revolutionized in fields as the ones with global connectivity, Earth observation, and deep space exploration. With modern data being passed abundantly in satellite networks that are central in modern infrastructure, security and integrity of data passed between satellites, spacecraft, and ground stations is critical. Data tampering, unauthorized access, signal jamming, and cyber attacks are all threats to the reliability and security of space communications, which nevertheless have to contend with all of them. Such security measures are often effective in the Earth application, however, in the case of space operations where operations are specific and distributed, with high latency and scalability problems, those security measures are to break. However, the challenges with tamper resistance and immutability as well as consensus driven mechanism hindering the running of the existing systems have propelled Blockchain technology as a promising option to those challenges that are characterized with decentralization, immutability and

    consensus mechanisms. Thus, the framework that incorporates blockchain technology to present the vulnerability, exposing more to the element of data security and integrity of space communication is under investigation. This framework presents based on the characteristics of blockchain, novel means to overcome cyber threats and to ensure the secure transmission of space mission data as well as space communication system, which is capable of resisting cyber threats.

    1. Problem Statement

      These range from global connectivity to earth observation to deep space exploration; all are vital space communications. Since satellite networks are going to be the new way of doing business, data security and integrity remain extremely important. On the other hand, space communications are subject to threat such as data tampering, unauthorized access, signal jamming, spoofer which will expose the infrastructure such as satellites and space stations to the risk of being compromised which may to lead to mission success or data reliability being compromised [14].

      However, conventional security measures like AES encryption and centralized authentication system fail in space en vironments with high latency and decentralization. At network level, real time data integrity is a difficult task both due to the scalability issues, communication delays and the known vulnerabilities of centralized entities in control points. However, there are single points of failure in ground stations [7]. But, from these vulnerabilities, we know how easy it is to exploit them; they attack data integrity from cyber attacks to GPS spoofing among others. In this work, we attempt to find out how we can strengthen data integrity and security in space communications with the aid of blockchain technology.

    2. Relevance of the Topic

      Examples of growing role for satellite networks are SpaceXs Starlink, and NASAs Artemis, which serve as good examples of the intention to have strong security mechanisms. But the more satellites are integrated into the global infrastructure, the more paramount becomes having a tamper proof method of data transmission. Space communications based on high latency characteristics of decentralized are untypical for the models of security basing on the utilized terrestrial networks.

      Published by : International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)

      International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology

      Blockchain technology, with its decentralization, immutability, and consensus-driven mechanisms, offers a promising solution. This can protect communication networks through the provision of transparent, immutable records of communication that can overcome the vulnerability to hacking access, data alteration, or sabotage of the signals in the satellite and interplanetary systems. Blockchain is one of the key components to maintain the data integrity of data in hostile space environment which the traditional security models do not find useful [25].

    3. Objectives

    The objectives of this research are the following.

    • The analysis of blockchains capabilities in addressing space communications security vulnerabilities based on the data integrity and security that blockchain offers beyond current frameworks.
    • The blockchains ability to maintain its decentralized architecture will be utilized to propose a blockchain framework for integrating in existing space communication systems to protect the transmitted data from tampering and unauthorized access.
    • How the framework can be made useful in real space situations by assessing the practicality of proposed framework through simulations and case studies; NASAs Artemis program and SpaceXs Starlink.
    • It is aimed to make original contributions to the intersection of blockchain technology and space cybersecurity and build a base for future study and develop the space communication security.
  2. BACKGROUND AND LITERATURE REVIEW
      1. Security Challenges in Space Communications

        Satellite networks and other space communication systems are susceptible to a variety of dangers, such as cyberattacks including satellite hacking and GPS spoofing, illegal data interception, and single point of failure hazards. For instance, the 2018 hack of NASAs systems brought to light the serious ecurity issues that satellite systems confront [14]. Despite the widespread use of conventional security mechanisms like centralized authentication, Trusted Platform Modules (TPMs), and AES encryption, these approaches frequently fail to meet the particular scalability and latency issues of space systems. Current centralized solutions, though effective on Earth, introduce significant vulnerabilities when applied to spaces highlatency, decentralized environment [7]. The limitations of these security models underscore the need for more resilient, decentralized approaches, particularly in trustless environments like space operations.

      2. Blockchain Technology in Cybersecurity [13] was the first to introduce blockchain technology, which is characterized by its consensus-driven nature, decentralization, and immutability. Because of these fundamental characteristics, blockchain holds great promise for improving cybersecurity, particularly in settings where building confidence can be difficult. Blockchain has shown promise in supply chain

        ISSN: 2278-0181

        Vol. 14 Issue 03, March-2025

        management and Internet of Things ((IoT) network security [4]. With the potential to create transparent, impenetrable communication networks, its potential to provide comparable advantages for space communication systems is becoming more widely acknowledged. Blockchains application in spacespecific situations is still poorly understood, despite its success in terrestrial applications; this represents a substantial research need. The difficulties of extending blockchain technology to space, specifically the problems of scalability, energy efficiency, and latency, continue to be major obstacles to its adoption in this field.

        TABLE I

        COMPARISON OF SECURITY MODELS IN SPACE COMMUNICATION

        Security Model Strengths Weaknesses Applicability

        to Space Systems
        AES

        Encryption

        		 Provide strong encryption Vulnerable to attacks Best for

        high-traffic, terrestrial environments; not scalable or resilient in

        spac

        e

        environments
        TPM Secure hardwarebased encryption Vulnerable

        to physical attacks

        		 Best for

        terrestrial environments; not easily scalable in

        space
        Centralized Authentication Efficient for managing large numbers of

        users

        		 Single point of failure, vulnerable to attacks Not scalable or resilient in spac

        e environments
        Blockchain- Based Security Decentralized, immutable,

        scalable

        		 Energyintensive, requires high

        bandwidth for encryption

        		 Promising

        for space environments, suitable for decentralized communication

        networks
      3. Emerging Research at the Intersection

        In recent years, the possible applications of blockchain in space systems have begun to be explored. For instance, [28] suggest the employment of the blockchain for the satellite IoT network security, and [26] present the blockchain decentralized systems as an opportunity to improve space situational awareness (SSA). These studies show promising application scenarios, but also illustrate several challenges including the energy efficiency, latency tolerance, and as a result, the compatibility with the legacy space systems [3]. This research seeks to expand on these growing discoveries by overcoming the obstacles mentioned above and developing a beneficial framework for carrying out blockchain in space communications.

        Published by : http://www.ijert.org

        International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)

        ISSN: 2278-0181

        Vol. 14 Issue 03, March-2025

  3. PROPOSED FRAMEWORK
        1. Blockchain Architecture for Space Systems

          This frame of work proposed a strong, decentralized blockchain architecture to solve the special problems of space communication networks. Here, the satellites and all other ground stations, spacecraft will serve as the nodes in a

          distributed ledger network. Integrity and transparency of data sent across space systems will be ensured by each node having an independent copy of the blockchain. Besides, it makes the strategy decentralized, which means that there are no single points of failure and the resistance against illegal manipulation, data breaches, and signal jamming has been increased.

          The proposed architecture contains a hybrid consensus method to deal with the high latency demands and dynamic space environments. It achieves energy efficient space by combining Proof of Stake (PoS) with Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) [8]. However, since PoS consumes less power than classical Proof of Work (PoW) algorithms like SHA256, they are suitable as PoW is power hungry, which makes them ill suited for space systems in terms of hardware power consumption, whereas PBFT provides the necessary security and fault tolerance for space based applications. The dual consensus architecture allows the new system to accommodate the scalability and stability needed in the space and beyond satellite communication systems operations.

          In addition, smart contracts are instrumental in the automating such critical processes as data verification, access control, etc. These smart contracts will be designed such that they run predetermined rules and validations on telemetry data without the need for manual intervention and to prevent tampering of mission critical communications. The framework exploits the decentralized structure of blockchain and automates regular activities in order to minimize human error and increase the overall space operations efficiency.

        2. Integration with Existing Infrastructure

          The first among the main challenges to add new technology to space operations lies in assuring proper compatibility with the existing infrastructure. The blockchain infrastructure described above has exactly been engineered with the intention of interacting with existing space communication technologies without much substantial disturbance. With this in mind, the framework adheres itself to the already established standards (the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems [CCSDS] protocols) that impose certain communication and data interchange formats to the space systems. Adhering to these well established protocols the proposed system enhances the compatibility with the current space technology, thus important for its success.

          The framework adopts a hybrid data storage strategy to successfully manage the amounts of data generated by space missions like Earth imaging, telemetry data and scientific findings. The data is stored in both on-chain and off-chain storage formats with critical metadata and the hashes of all transactions stored on chain and most of the data such as

          TABLE II

          Consensu s Mechanis

          m

          		 Key Features Energy Efficiency Latency Security Space Applicabilit y
          PoS Energy- efficient, scalable More energyefficie nt than PBFT Typicall y lower latency in space

          systems

          		 Less

          secure than PBFT,

          but

          suf- ficient for many applicatio ns

          		 More applica-

          ble due to low

          energy consumpti on

          in space

          environmen ts
          PBFT Faulttolera nt, low latency Less energyefficie nt

          than PoS

          		 Higher latency than PoS in space

          syste ms

          		 More secure

          in terms

          of fault tolerance and network robstness

          		 Provides security under highlaten cy condition s, less suitable

          for lowenergy environmen ts

           

          COMPARISON OF POS AND PBFT MECHANISMS IN BLOCKCHAIN FRAMEWORK

          high resolution photography and big data sets off chain. This strategy allows bandwidth utilization as huge files do not have to be transmitted over the blockchain while ensuring the integrity of the data. Decentralized file storage systems like IPFS (InterPlanetary File System) can provide access to off chain data and the blockchain records verfiably its origin [29]. By combining the two layers of storage, this dual storage strategy helps the system scale and reduces cost, one of the primary challenges in the space communication systems; how to handle large, and of course, important (for science applications) data payloads.

        3. Security Enhancements

    Security is a critical concern in space communication systems, especially given the sophistication of cyber attacks and the impending arrival of quantum computing. To future-proof the proposed blockchain framework, quantum-resistant encryption is built into the system design. Lattice-based cryptography, a possible contender for quantum-resistant algorithms, will be utilized to maintain the security of blockchain data against the computational powers of quantum machines [15]. The framework offers quantum data protection by providing quantum resistant protocols in order to ensure lack of vulnerability to upcoming quantum decryption capabilities that will in future compromise the security of space communications.

    Published by :

    International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology

    Additionally, the immutability of the blockchain increases the security against tampering. Data recorded on the blockchain is immutable, thus if a mission critical or telemetry data is tampered with any illegal try to alter data would require updating every next block of data on every node which is

    International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)

    ISSN: 2278-0181

    Vol. 14 Issue 03, March-2025

    method, so as to enrich the qualitative and quantitative assessment of blockchain use. In addition, the research addresses how the blockchain model can support resilience, security, low latency, and low energy requirements so that the model can survive real-world space communication problems.

    Fig. 1. Data Flow Diagram of blockchain-space infrastructure integration.

    computationally impossible in a highly distributed system. The strength of quantum resistant encryption combined with this immutability means that data as its carried on a space mission will be safe from every human threat that exists today, as well as in the future, from potential breakthroughs by technology. The architecture also has tamper evidential logs for telemetry, tracking, and command (TT&C) data. The data of these log is immutable and publicly verifiable to let any anomaly in data get identified and corrected quickly. Another benefit of blockchain is the transparency of the system, this also provides stakeholders ability to audit the system in real time, which increases accountability and security of space operations.

  4. METHODOLOGY

    The research method employed in this study was a mixed method the theory was analyzed in parallel with an empirical validation using simulations and case studies. An examination of the proposed blockchain framework is provided using this

    1. Research Design

      The study employs a comparative evaluation methodology, examining blockchain-based security models alongside traditional security frameworks (such as AES encryption and centralized authentication mechanisms). In the study, the advances of blockchain in the areas of data integrity, attack resilience, operational efficiency, and its usefulness in overcoming the cyber threats in space communications are measured.

      For this the study makes use of simulation based exper imentation involving widely used network modeling tools such as NS-3 (Network Simulator-3) and OMNeT++. Using these tools, satellite network topologies based on space will be modeled and the system of satellite nodes will be simulated within a decentralized blockchain framework. The network latency, the consensus validation time and throughput in the presence of such attacks [12] will be measured as key performance indicators (KPIs).

      Published by : http://www.ijert.org

      International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)

      ISSN: 2278-0181

      Vol. 14 Issue 03, March-2025

      The study will also discuss the practicalness of incorporating blockchain within the satellite architectures through evaluation of real world case studies namely SpaceXs Starlink network and NASAs deep space missions. Using the case study investigation the case study investigates blockchains ability to be adaptable to these mission needs given concern of communication delay, energy consumption, and interoperability with existing space equipment.

    2. Data Collection

      To assess the resilience of the blockchain framework to cyber threats typical of space systems under study, the empirical data used will be generated through controlled assault simulations. The attack scenarios include:

      • Man in The Middle (MITM) Attacks: Understanding blockchains capacity to avoid the unlawful interception and modification with satellite data.
      • Sybil Attacks: Simulating adversarial nodes seeking to undermine network consensus and assessing the resilience of the hybrid PoS-PBFT mechanism.
      • Data Replay Attacks: Measuring blockchains immutability at stopping illegal transmission of old or illegal replicas of data.
      • Smart Contract Exploits: Identifying flaws in automated contract execution for mission-critical functions like access control and data validation.

        Key performance metrics to be collected include:

      • Transaction finality time is the time required for data validation and consensus in high-latency space contexts.
      • Node resilience refers to the frameworks capacity to preserve operational integrity even when a subset of nodes fail or behave maliciously.
      • Energy consumption is the computational efficiency of blockchain processes, especially in resource-constrained satellite situations.
      • Data throughput and bandwidth efficiency: Assessing blockchains impact on space-based communication systems.
    3. Validation

    To guarantee that the suggested framework is practical, secure, and compliant, the study employs a multi-tier validation strategy that includes peer review, benchmarking, and compliance testing.

    • Peer Review by specialists: Aerospace engineers, blockchain developers, and cybersecurity specialists who specialize in space systems will evaluate the blockchain security frameworks feasibility, efficiency, and security assurances.
    • Benchmarking Against Industry Standards: The framework will be evaluated against the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) cybersecurity standards [17] to ensure compliance with industry best practices.
    • Comparative Testing with Existing Security Protocols: The blockchain type will be test against the traditional related

    cybersecurity protocols for example AES encryption, secure modules (TPMs) and centralized authentication models to provide advantages and disadvantages with blockchain.

    Fig. 2. Simulation Results Graph

    All of these processes are combined to create a holistic analysis that uses theoretical analysis, simulation based exerimentation, real world case study evaluation and compliance testing before coming to a conclusion about whether blockchain could be used to protect and secure space communications. The results of this dissertation will contribute to discussion regarding uses of blockchain in aerospace cybersecurity on the part of space agencies and the private sector that are considering the use of blockchain for future mission use.

  5. EXPECTED RESULTS

    In order to complete a full assessment of the role of blockchain technology as a protection for space communications and operations, this study was performed. This paper seeks to thoroughly investigate and examine how blockchain has the potential to mitigate cyber threats and to ensure data integrity, hence provide both practical implication and theoretical advancement. In addition to adding to blockchain applications for aerospace cybersecurity in the scholarly discussion, the results will provide a foundation for actual space mission deployment of blockchain based security solutions.

    Published by :

    International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology

    1. Theoretical Contributions

      It is expected that this research will prove blockchain technology as a valid way to enhance space communications security by overcoming the significant challenges in

      TABLE III

      COMPARISON OF ATTACK SCENARIOS AND BLOCKCHAIN FRAMEWORK EFFECTIVENESS

      Attack Scenario Traditional Security Model Ef- fectiveness Blockchain Framework Effectiveness Improvemen Percentage t Cost-

      Effectiveness & Com-

      plexity
      MITM Low High 50% High complexity, higher

      initial cost due

      to integration,

      but long- term savings through reduced attack success
      Sybil Moderate High 40% Moderate cost, moderate complexity, requires more com-

      putational resources for validation
      Data Replay Moderate High 40% Low to

      moderate cost,

      easier to

      implement, but blockchains decentralized nature could introduce complexity in real-time

      validation

      data tampering, unauthorized access, and signal spoofing efficiently. It will contribute to existing literature by demonstrating how blockchain-based models outperform traditional security frameworks, including AES encryption and Trusted Platform Modules (TPMs), in terms of resilience and data integrity in high-latency, decentralized space environments. Additionally, the study suggests a brand-new hybrid consensus mechanism that combines Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) with Proof of Stake (PoS), designed to optimize energy efficiency, security, and low- latency validation, thus addressing a significant gap in blockchains application to space networks. By extending blockchains applicability beyond terrestrial contexts, this research bridges the gap between blockchain technology and aerospace cybersecurity, offering a scalable and decentralized alternative to centralized authentication models. Additionally,

      International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)

      ISSN: 2278-0181

      Vol. 14 Issue 03, March-2025

      the study explores both onchain and off-chain data management models to handle large payloads, such as satellite telemetry and Earth imagery, while maintaining both security and accessibility. These theoretical

      Fig. 3. Energy Consumption vs. Network Throughput Graph

      advancements will serve as a foundational basis for future studies in blockchain-enabled space security, guiding both academic researchers and industry stakeholders toward more resilient and scalable cybersecurity frameworks for satellite and deep-space networks.

    2. Practical Implications

      The practical implications of this research are significant for both governmental space agencies and private-sector satellite operators. The adoption of blockchain technology is expected to enhance data integrity in space missions by eliminating single points of failure and ensuring the creation of tamperproof telemetry logs, which is particularly crucial for interplanetary exploration, deep-space navigation, and military satellite operations. Additionally, blockchains transparent and immutable ledger will foster increased trust in commercial satellite operators by providing independent verification of satellite operations, which is beneficial not only for commercial satellite providers but also for space insurance companies and regulatory bodies, ensuring compliance with international space security standards. The implementation of decentralized security frameworks will be especially important with the rise of mega-constellations like Starlink and space-based IoT systems, enabling secure peer-to-peer data exchanges without reliance on vulnerable centralized ground stations. Furthermore, this research will contribute evidence-based recommendations to space agencies and international regulatory bodies, such as the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and ISO/TC 307, advocating for the standardization of blockchain security protocols in space systems. Lastly, while blockchain implementation will

      Published by : http://www.ijert.org

      International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)

      ISSN: 2278-0181

      Vol. 14 Issue 03, March-2025

      undoubtedly improve cybersecurity in space systems, this study will also critically examine the trade-offs between security and performance, analyzing challenges such as latency overhead and energy consumption, and offering optimization strategies to balance security needs with operational efficiency.

  6. DISCUSSION

    Paradigm shift in data integrity, authentication, as well as cyber attack resilience, is introduced to space communications by incorporating blockchain technology. While the proposed architecture provides a decentralized, immutable solution adapted to the constraints of high-latency space environments, it is important to address specific limits, policy issues, and future research areas to enable its practical application.

      1. Limitations

        Although the advantages of blockchain are many, applying it in space systems is without constraints. The foremost limitation is energy consumption, which is an important concern particularly when this system is used in space based environments where computational resources are limited and power efficiency is a necessity. However traditional blockchain con sensus mechanisms like Proof of Work (PoW) is very power intensive and does not allow for the involved machinery to have very limited power availability. An attempt to reduce computational complexity of PBFT and keep security and fault tolerance is the adoption of hybrid consensus models such as Proof of Stake (PoS) and Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT) [3]. Yet, additional research is required to get energy efficient blockchain protocols that are customised towards long duration space mission, particularly those which run outside Earths orbit and would not be able to continuously communicate and validate (i.e. update) with ground stations.

        Another difficulty is network latency and synchronization. Because of the huge distances involved in interplanetary communication, blockchain transactions in space may encounter considerable delays, making real-time consensus validation more challenging. Unlike terrestrial blockchain networks, which rely on constant high-speed connectivity, space networks must operate in environments with sporadic connectivity and significant propagation delays. Designing a blockchain system that supports asynchronous validation techniques while maintaining ata integrity will be critical to its successful implementation in deep-space contexts.

        Furthermore, the interoperability of blockchain with existing space communication standards remains a pressing concern. Most space agencies and commercial satellite operators currently rely on centralized architectures and well-established communication protocols such as those defined by the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS). Ensuring seamless integration between blockchain-based frameworks and these legacy systems is necessary to encourage adoption while minimizing operational disruptions.

      2. Policy Recommendations

        The successful implementation of blockchain in space systems will require well-defined regulatory frameworks and governance structures to ensure security, accountability, and interoperability among international stakeholders. Given the increasing role of private-sector players in satellite operations, as seen with SpaceX, OneWeb, and Amazons Project Kuiper, a clear legal and policy framework is needed to regulate data sovereignty, encryption standards, and cross-border compliance in blockchain-secured space networks.

        The International Telecommunication Union (ITU) and ISO/TC 307 (Blockchain and Distributed Ledger Technologies) should spearhead efforts to establish global standards for blockchain adoption in space systems [10]. These organizations must work collaboratively with national space agencies, including NASA, ESA, CNSA, and ISRO, to create unified security protocols that address blockchain governance, key management, and access control for multi-agency space missions. Furthermore, regulatory measures must be put in place to govern smart contract execution, particularly in missioncritical applications such as automated access control, orbital traffic management, and space situational awareness (SSA).

        Additionally, the emergence of quantum-resistant cryptographic standards must be considered in blockchain policy development. With advancements in quantum computing posing potential threats to existing encryption mechanisms, space agencies must proactively develop guidelines that incorporate lattice-based and post-quantum cryptographic solutions to future-proof blockchain-based security architectures.

      3. Future Research

    The integration of blockchain into space communication is still in its early stages, and several areas of future research must be explored to enhance its scalability, security, and efficiency. One promising direction is the development of hybrid blockchain- quantum systems, which would leverage the security benefits of quantum key distribution (QKD) while maintaining blockchains decentralized integrity. Combining quantum technologies and blockchain could secure interplanetary data flows, reducing vulnerabilities in traditional encryption systems [15].

    Furthermore, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning in blockchain-based space networks has important implications for real-time anomaly detection, predictive analytics, and automated security audits. AI-powered models might continuously monitor blockchain transaction patterns to detect aberrant activity, unauthorized access attempts, or potential cyber threats, strengthening space systems proactive security measures. The use of blockchain-audited AI models would provide a self-learning security infrastructure, decreasing human intervention while increasing system reliability.

    Another key area of research is the optimization of energyefficient consensus mechanisms for space applications. While PoS and PBFT offer improvements over traditional PoW

    Published by : http://www.ijert.org

    International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)

    ISSN: 2278-0181

    Vol. 14 Issue 03, March-2025

    models,Other strategies like Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) or Proof of Authority (PoA) could reduce computing cost even more, making blockchain a more viable solution for lowpower satellite networks. Research into adaptive consensus mechanisms, which can dynamically switch between different validation methods based on network conditions, may also prove beneficial in ensuring efficiency in varying space environments.

    Finally, testing blockchain in real-world space missions will be critical for validating its feasibility. While theoretical models and simulations provide insight into blockchains potential benefits, practical demonstrations onboard active spacecraft such as small CubeSat experiments or ISS-based blockchain nodeswould offer empirical data to refine its architecture. Collaboration between academic institutions, space agencies, and commercial satellite operators will be essential to drive these experimental initiatives forward.

  7. CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that blockchain technology offers a transformative approach to securing space communications by addressing vulnerabilities such as data tampering, unauthorized access, and centralized failure points. Through a hybrid PoS- PBFT consensus model, the proposed framework ensures resilient, energy-efficient, and low-latency validation suitable for space environments. By integrating smart contracts and quantum-resistant cryptography, the system enhances data integrity, authentication, and operational security in satellite and deep-space networks.

The findings suggest that blockchain can significantly improve the security and transparency of satellite communications, interplanetary data transfers, and space-based IoT networks. However, challenges such as energy efficiency, network latency, and interoperability must be further addressed for large-scale adoption. Governments, space agencies, and private stakeholders should actively pilot blockchain solutions, collaborate on global regulatory frameworks, and conduct realworld deployments to validate the technologys feasibility. By doing so, blockchain can become a cornerstone of secure, decentralized space infrastructure, ensuring mission integrity in an increasingly digitalized aerospace landscape.

REFERENCES

  1. M. Alves, J. Veirier DAiguebonne, T. Gateau, and J. Lacan, Blockchain- enabled redundant fractionated spacecraft system, Acta Astronautica, vol. 200, pp. 100115, 2023. [Online]. Available:

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.09.010

  2. R. L. Baima, L. Chovet, E. Hartwich, A. Bera, J. Sedlmeir, G. Fridgen, and M. Olivares-Mendez,´ Trustful coopetitive infrastructures for the new space exploration era, Space Policy, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 112125, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2022.101449
  3. D. Bhuva and S. A. P. Kumar, Securing space cognitive communication with blockchain, Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 205, p. 103115, 2023. [Online]. Available:

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2022.103115

  4. V. Buterin, Ethereum: A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform, White Paper, 2014. [Online].

    Available: https://ethereum.org/en/whitepaper/

  5. Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems, Space communications protocols, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://public.ccsds.org/
  6. J. de La Beaujardiere, R. Mital, and R. Mital, Blockchain application` within a multi-sensor satellite architecture, Journal of Aerospace Information Systems, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 7892, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.2514/1.I010990
  7. European Space Agency (ESA), Security frameworks for space communications, Annual Report, 2022.
  8. D. Hyland-Wood, P. Robinson, R. Saltini, S. Johnson, and C. Hare, Methods for securing spacecraft tasking and control via an enterprise Ethereum blockchain, Space Science Reviews, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 45 60, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-02300897-

    2

  9. International Organization for Standardization/Technical Committee 307 (ISO/TC 307), Blockchain and distributed ledger technologies, Standardization Efforts, 2023.
  10. International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Regulatory frameworks for blockchain in telecommunications, Guidelines, 2023.
  11. R. Khalil, M. Rahman, and M. Hassan, Blockchain for satellite IoT: A survey, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 15001525, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2021.3074061
  12. C. Li, X. Sun, and Z. Zhang, Effective methods and performance analysis of a satellite network security mechanism based on blockchain technology, Journal of Communications and Networks, vol. 25, no. 2,

    pp. 90105, 2023. [Online]. Available:

    https://doi.org/10.23919/JCN.2023.000007

  13. S. Nakamoto, Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system, White Paper, 2008. [Online]. Available: https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
  14. NASA, Cybersecurity in space: Challenges and solutions, Technical Report, 2021.
  15. S. H. Naidu, T. R. D. Kumar, C. R. Kumar, G. Praveen, and G.

    Yokesh, Utilizing the innovative block quantum computing approach of BQSAT for secure satellite communication, Quantum Information Processing, vol. 22, no. 1, p. 50, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-023-03769-5

  16. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Cybersecurity in space: Challenges and solutions, Technical Report, 2021.
  17. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Cybersecurity framework for space systems, Guidelines, 2023.
  18. T. P. Okoumassoun, I. Al Ridhawi, A. Abbas, and I. Al-Oqily, Blockchain-enabled SAGIN communication for disaster prediction and management, Sensors, vol. 23, no. 4, p. 210, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23010210
  19. B. Sriman and V. S. S. Kandregula, The next level of security: Scalable solution blockchain (SSSB) in satellite communication system, International Journal of Satellite Technology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 2235, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13171-023-00234-5
  20. Starlink, SpaceXs satellite internet constellation, Project Overview, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.starlink.com/
  21. G. Sylos Labini, C. Abbattista, V. Fortunato, L. Amoruso, R. Pareschi, and P. Bottoni, Blockchain-enabled satellite onboard computing for smart contract: Benefits for multi-sided markets and IoT applications, Remote Sensing, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 300, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030300
  22. M. Torky, T. Gaber, E. Goda, V. Snasel, and A. E. Hassanien, A blockchain protocol for authenticating space communications between satellites constellations, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 59
  23. Union of Concerned Scientists, UCS satellite database, 2023. [Online].

    Available: https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/satellite-database

  24. B. Wang, S. Chang, S. C. Li, and T. Ham¨ al¨ ainen, An efficient¨ and privacy-preserving blockchain-based authentication scheme for low Earth orbit satellite-assisted Internet of Things, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 50005015, Apr. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TVT.2022.3223456

    Published by : http://www.ijert.org

    International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT)

    ISSN: 2278-0181

    Vol. 14 Issue 03, March-2025

  25. Y. Wu, A. P. Makki, K. Padron, and P. Nguyen, Blockchain-based finegrained access control for space resource sharing and management, Journal of Space Communications, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 4560, 2023.
  26. R. Xu, Y. Chen, E. Blasch, and G. Chen, Exploration of blockchainenabled decentralized capability-based access control strategy for space situation awareness, IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 1234512360, 2023.[Online]. Available:

    https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3245678

  27. G.Yan, JLi, Z. Li, J. Xu, Z. Bai, Q. Wang, and H. Xiong, Blockchain- based satellite group intelligent cooperative operation control method and system, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 150165, May 2023. [Online]. Available:

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cja.2022.12.005

  28. Y. Zhang, P. Zhang, M. Guizani, Z. Ji, J. Wang, and H. Zhu, Blockchain- based secure communication of IoT in space-air-ground, IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 45004515, Mar. 2023. [Online].

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2022.3217890

  29. N. Sangeeta and S. Y. Nam, Blockchain and Interplanetary File System (IPFS)-Based Data Storage System for Vehicular Networks with Keyword Search Capability, Electronics, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 1545, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/electronics12071545.