Cognitive Radio Based Enhanced Compressive Spectrum Sensing Technique for 5G Adhoc Networks

Cognitive Radio Based Enhanced Compressive Spectrum Sensing Technique for 5G Adhoc Networks

Kamal Nayanam Vatsala Sharma

Electronics & Communication Engineering department Electronics & Communication Engineering department BMIET, Sonipat, India Government Engineering College, Buxar, India

Abstract:- Spectrum sensing issue in challenging cognitive radio network. A particular, wideband spectrum sensing gains more attention due to came out 5G wireless networks distinguish by highly data rates in the order of thousands of Gbps. Conventional sensing approach in uses samples for its attention on Nyquist rate. Due to hardware cost and sampling rate control those techniques can sense only one band at a time. limitations (E-CRNs) limitations based limitations (SS) limitations and spectrum aggregation (SA) are proposed for the fifth generation (5G) wireless networks. The E-CRNs jointly exploit the licensed spectrum shared with the primary user (PU) networks and the unlicensed spectrum aggregated from the industrial, scientific, and medical (ISM) bands. The PU networks include TV systems in TV white space (TVWS) and different incumbent systems in the long term evolution (LTE) time division duplexing (TDD) bands. The harmful interference from the E-CRNs to the PU networks are delicately controlled. Furthermore, the coexistence between the E-CRNs and other unlicensed systems, such as WiFi, is studied. IN spite of this issue peripheral users have to sense multiple frequency bands using head-on technologies which lead into expand cost, time and problem. Considering the facts and issues, compressive sensing was grated to base the computation time by improvement the sensing process even for medium dimensional resources. Valuable This enhanced decoding algorithm is applied to two existing URA algorithms, and the performance benefits of the algorithm are characterized[24]. In the last decade various researchers paid more attention to improve the performance of compressive sensing in cognitive radio networks based on sensing matrix, sparse representation and recovery process. This survey paper provides an in-depth analysis of conventional models and its sensing strategies in cognitive radio networks along with its merits and demerits to obtain a detailed insight about compressive sensing. The ECRNs framework for 5G wireless communication networks.

Keywords: – Compressive sensing, spectrum sensing, Narrowband Sensing; Nyquist theorems, Cognitive radio networks channel estimation

INTRODUCTION

The radio spectrum resources increase due to the improvement in wireless communications. Federal communications commission has set up regulations to access this limited spectrum resource. Using specific wireless services, the spectrum is allocated to the allow users basedon spectrum allocation policy which is defined by FCC [1]. In recent years, a lot of research has been done on the effective use of these spectrum bands which are either empty or are not used at full capacities. The (5G) mobile communication system comes into being. Cellular network through Internet of Things (IoT) will be the prime driving force for 5G development as well as for device connection. The fifth generation will give a platform for people of various regions not only toexchangeb information but also the of all things begins from home implementation to industrial applications . authorised users are permit to transmit and receive data through allocation spectrum while, the un-licensed users are unauthorised to utilize the resource. Due to this reason, some of the channels are heavily used and other channels are not used properly which leads into spectrum underutilization. The licensed users are the primary users and the unlicensed users are considered as secondary users. The Primary users will not utilize the resource all the times which a spectrum hole [2]. These holes are not utilized and the spectrum remains unused by licensed user leads into incapacity as the other users do not utilize the spectrum which results into spectrum scarcity. To degrade spectrum scarcity dynamic spectrum operation is introduced to utilize the unused spectrum without excitable the performance to first users. Secondary users are allowed to utilize the spectrum ifit is unused in PUs. Cognitive radio network [3] performed by spectrum utilization in this form. It located the available channel and allocates to second users to reduce the powerless in spectrum. Figure 1 gives an illustration of dynamic spectrum access in cognitive radio network.

5G COGNITIVE RADIO NETWORK

Cognitive Radio gives an opening to reuse valuable spectrum resources do not change inspectrum allocation policy which address a problem of lowest utilization rate. The core idea behind Cognitive to share the spectrum throughout dynamic spectrum access and inference of sharing is that SUs can used to idle spectrum of Pus but only if they interfere with communication of PUs. The brief diagram of spectrum sensing is shown in Figure-1

Figure-1: Spectrum Sensing.

The object of the sensing technique is to checked for the status for the spectrum. Also, to checked the activity of authorized user by sensing periodically. The CR transceiver like for an idle band i.e., spectrum holes without causing interference to the primary network. Sensing can be of centralized and distributed. First step of sensing to complete spectrum sharing to improve spectrum utilization and can be realize for various application. SUs continuously detect frequency. In digital systems, data acquisition and sampling are considered as an important aspect. Compressive sensing is an acquisition and reconstruction algorithm [7] which combines sampling and sensing. Initially it was introduced to sample the signals based on the Nyquist rate where the conventional sensing modelsare performed sensing using Shannon- Nyquist theorem [8]. The signal recovery in conventional models forces the receiver to change its sampling rate similar to Nyquist rate to recover the information. The limitation of Nyquist theorem-based sampling is present in its bandwidth specification. Minimum two times of signal bandwidth is required to recover a signal in Nyquist sampling which leads into numerous samples and makes the acquisition process as cost expensive in large communication networks. Instead compressive sensing recovers the signals with few samples and measurement values which is far betterthan conventional models [23]. Based on three process such as spare representation, encoding and decoding, compressive sensing is performed. In this sparse representation is used to identify and restore the signals as more as possible[20].The Based on measurement matrix, the merge signals are sampled and then compressed. the suitable recovery algorithm, the condense signals has been recovered in the receiver end.

Figure 2:-A block diagrams for sub-Nquist wideband sensing algorithm :(a) Analog to information converter-based wideband sensing,(b) Modulated wideband converter-based wideband sensing,(c) Multi-cost sampling-based wideband sensing and (d) Multi-rate sub-Nquist sampling-based wideband.

Sample Condense Transmit

Receiver De-Condense

Figure3:- Conventional Sampling and Data Compression

Data

Compressive sensing

Transmit

Receive Decode

Figure 4:- Compressive sensing data scheme.

Spectrum Sensing:The primary user is using the spectrum based on the signal received on a specific frequency band, The goal of the sensing technique is to check for the status of the spectrum. Also, to check the activity of licensed user by sensing periodically. The CR transceiver looks for an idle band i.e., spectrum holes without causing interference to the primary network. Sensing can be of centralized and distributed. First step of sensing to complete spectrum sharing to improve spectrum utilization and. band used by Pus in multidimensional space- spatial domain [12]. Basically it detects the unused spectrum as a hole is availablity. The primary objective of spectrum sensing is to discover the position ofspectrum and also the steps of licensed users by sensing selected band periodically. Cognitive radio transceiver will detect if there are spectrum holes be find out a technique to approch it withoutinterfering the licensed users transmission or receiving.

Figure 5: General model of spectrum.

1. Spectrum Allocation: It is based availability of spectrum holes and give out the unused spectrum to secondary users. The numbers of holes were not fixed and the secondary users need to compete in QoS are different for different users. Therefore spectrum holes need to be used rather and efficiently. The basic need of spectrum allocation is to design an efficient spectrum allocation algorithms and protocols through which spectrum utilization efficiency can be an expand, conflict-free and preferably close to optimal point as possible.

2. Spectrum Management: The authorized, unauthorized and unused spectrum bands are spread over a big number of frequencies in the cognitive radio networks. These unused spectrum bands showing different properties according to the time varying radio environment. The Cognitive radio has to decide the best available spectrum band, fulfills the QoS requirements. The mutual information obtained from spectrum sensing is to plan and scheme the spectrum access by users which do not have permitted to access the spectrum. The basic component of spectrum management is: spectrum access and spectrum analysis.

   1. Spectrum Analysis: In this the data get from sensing is dissected first to assemble information about the spectrum holes and the opinion is made by optimizing the system performance on requested objective and constraints.

   2. Spectrum Access: The decision on spectrum entry which is based on spectrum analysis, the unauthorized users can access a holes. Mainly it is carried out on a cognitive access compact call MAC protocol through which collision can be overview between first users and also with others secondary users.In order to access the frequency band the first priority is given to first user where as secondary user subordinate relation to access it. It require efficient algorithm to order multiple secondary users to access spectrum holes and avoid the conflicts between primary and secondary users while spectrum band.

compressive sensing The cognitive radio networks is expand in last decade and numerous research works are evolved to improve the sensing using and other parameters. This section provides a detailed analysis of existing research models in detail to obtain the issues in compressive sensing methods. On view of analyzing the compressive sensing, a detailed classification is presented in figure 4. Generally compressive sensing is classified into divided sensing and common

compressive sensing [14]. In distributed compressive sensing the sampling is carried out in separate manner where the recovery is performed in joint manner. In this data gain from each node and sampling is performed based on sensing matrix to obtain signal measurements. Also, the same reconstruction is used jointly to recover the signal. Reduced data storage and measurement rates are the advantages of this distributed compressive sensing. Using the same sensing matrix, the measurements and reconstruction of the signals are performed in jointly compressive sensing process. Wide band compressive spectrum sensing is used to ascertain wideband spectrum based on sampling frequency. It is classified based on the Nyquist [14] and sub Nyquist [15] approaches. In this Nyquist based approach, Nyquist sampling rate is used to obtain the desired spectrum. It is a cost-efficient model which easily identifies the spectrum state. In Nyquist based approach the unused spectrums are using conventional digital signal processors followed by analog to digital converter. the sampling spectrum follows the Shannon sampling theorem which reduces the aliasing effect which makes the sensing process is suitable for multiband sensing operations. Edge detection [16] is a simple approach which progress based on this model, it differentiates the spectrum status as occupied or unused spectrum through its simple sampling rate. The performance of edge detection lags in its increased sensing time and complexity. To reduce the limitations in Nyquist sampling-based models, Sub-NY Quist approaches are involved.

Figure5 :- Classification of Compressive Sensing.

CLASSIFICATION OF DIFFERENT SENSING TECHNIQUES

The sensing technique can be broadly divided into two categories such as: narrow band spectrum sensing and wideband spectrum sensing. The classification is shown in Figure-3.

• Narrow Band Spectrum Sensing is technique which includes energy detection, cyclostationary detection, matched filteringdetection, covariance- based detection and ML based sensing.

• Wideband Spectrum Sensing use two detection technique nyquist based and compressive sensing detection. Basically in Nyquist based the wideband signals get sampled by ADC at high sampling rate and low power consumption. It includes wavelet detection and filter bank based sensing. Secondly in Compressive sensing

  NARROWBAND SENSING TECHNIQUES:-

  In this technique the secondary users allowed to decide about their presence or absence of primary users over a channel of interest. Consequently this algorithm needs to able to determine accurate spectrum hole and it can be expressed as two element hypothesis detection model:

  0: () = 5()

  {1: () = () + 5(). (i)

  The above mentioned equation indicate two hypothesis of non-existence or existence of s(t). Here (t) indicate additive white Gaussian noise and s(t) is the signal of primary user for target channel. The state H0 corresponds primary user absence and state H1 correspond primary user presence. Basically these techniques are often evaluated using probabilities of detection. These two probabilities can be defined asfollow.

  = (0) & = (0) (ii).

  Compressive sensing is further analysed based on the following factors

• Sparsity Model

• Acquisition Model

• Reconstruction model

1. Sparsity-based models

   In this, sparsity-based models use its sparsity order to define the signal with number of non-zero elementsby estimate the flexible degree [26]. Since sparsity plays an essential role in compressive sensing, it asset to connect the necessary essinational which is required to perform recovery of thesignal. Based on these numerous research models are involved. Expect upon the recovery error and sampling rate the sparsity is value in non-blind compressive spectrum sensing [27]. Where as in blind spectrum sensing the problem of sensing process is reduced as it does not need prior knowledge about the sparsity level [28]. Based on these second categories researchers introduced various implementation Second step compressive spectrum sensing for wideband cognitive radio network is reported in[30] to estimate the sparsity order and the number of samples. Using less number of samples, the first step isused to estimate the unknown spectrum where as in two step the number of samples which requires is added and then used in network. Based on the second steps and the sample values the spectrum is restore and sensing decision is taken in the network. Under unsight compressive spectrum sensing, unused correlation matrix detection is suggested in literature [31] which effectively obtains the non-zero elements located over a multiband signal without any signal parameter knowledge. Based on the adjoin frequenys energy ratios and sub Nyquist sampling values the sensing process is prepare. Later discrete cosine transform based compressive spectrum sensing is envolved to estimate the sparsity of the first user signal [32]. Based on energy concentration the performance is compared with discrete Fourier transform which greatly improves the signal detection in cognitive radio network. The advantages of non-blind compressive sensing model are afford in its utilization of reduced number of measurements to estimate the signal sparsity and minimized recovery error. The estimation process makes the sparsity into many complex is considered as the limitation. In blind compressive spectrum sensing [33], estimation of sparsity level is not required which greatly reduces the computation complexity and accelerates the detection process. The limitation of blind compressive spectrum sensing is present in its reduced quality of signal reconstruction. Detailed analysis of sparsely models is listed in table 1.

   Figure. 6. An example of a sub-Nyquist system, the sparsity level uncertainty will result in more number of measurements for a fixed successful recovery rate. In simulations, assuming the number of measurements under the Nyquist rate N = 200, we varied the number of measurements M from 20 to 180 in eight equal- length s

   Table 1 Merits and Demerits of existing sparsity models.

   S.No.	Algorithms	Merit	Demerit
   1	Wavelet model
   2	Two step compressive sensing
   3	Adaptive compressive sensing
   4	DCT without recovery

   • Reduced latency

   • High energy consumption

   • High complexity

   • Good estimation of wideband signal sparsity

   • Number of Minimum samples

   • Complex due to estimation characteristics

   • Predefined number of samples

   • Controlled recovery error

   • High computation problem

   • Decrease complexity

   • Sparsity estimation not required

   • Measurement based directrecovery

   • Reduced performance indetection probability

   • Increased false alarm rate

2. Acquisition-Based Models

   In the acquisition-based models, the received signal is first subsampled and then it is compressed fo

   further process [42]. Using various acquisition techniques like scarred convolution, Random demodulator, Random filtering and compressive multiplexer this operation are performed in acquisition models [43]. To improve the performance of sub Nyquist spectrum sensing sequence architecture-based application is developed. In few research works are outline in literature [44] for spectrum acquisition in which continuous to finite block is replaced with pseudo inversion process which reduces the complexity in computation. Later using Bayesian learning [46] based recovery algorithms are implemented using sparse which remoter reduces the numbers complexity. Similarly, variousmethodologies are introduced in the same line by focussing compression in the acquisition process. This helps to better the compression parameter but lags in other came to functions of the network.Regular parity check [47] matrix is used in compressive spectrum sensing to improvement the sensing performance. It uses basic RPC matrix to evaluate the functions related to sensing process in the network. Though, the performance metrics are notable, modified regular parity checker matrix is introduced by replacing basic matrix into semi orthogonal matrix which improves the sensing process in cognitive radio network [48]. The advantages of acquisition-based models are, reduced sensing time, low complexity, secure and easy implementation. The limitation of acquisition-based models is, low detection probability and reduced detection performance. Table 2 gives a comparison of few acquisition models with its merits and demerits in detail.

   Two step compressive spectrum sensing for wideband cognitive radio network is reported in[30] to estimate the sparsity order and the number of samples. Using small number of samples, the first step is used to estimate the unknown spectrum where as in second step the number of samples which requires is added and then used in network. Based on the two steps and the sample values the spectrum is reconstructed and sensing decision is taken in the network. Under blind compressive spectrum sensing, residual correlation matrix detection is proposed in literature [31] which effectively obtains the non-zero elements location over a multiband signal without any signal parameter knowledge. Based on the adjacent frequencys energy ratios and sub Nyquist sampling values the sensing process is formulated. Later discrete cosine transform based compressive spectrum sensing is evolved to estimate the sparsity of the primary user signal to primary number. [32]. Based on energy concentration the performance is compared with discrete Fourier transform which greatly improves the signal detection in cognitive radio network. The advantages of non-blind compressive sensing model are present in its utilization of reduced number of measurements to estimate the signal sparsity and minimized recovery error. The estimation process makes the sparsity into more complex is considered as the limitation. In blind compressive spectrum sensing [33], estimationof sparsity level is not required which greatly reduces the computation complexity and accelerates the detection process. The limitation of blind compressive spectrum sensing is present in its reduced quality of signal reconstruction. Detailed analysis of sparsity models is listed in table 2.

   	Algorithms	Merits	Demerits
   1	Wavelet model
   2	Two step compressive sensing
   3	Adaptive compressive sensing
   4	DCT without recovery
   5	One-bit compressive sensing

   • Reduced latency

   • High energy consumption

   • High complexity

   • Better estimation of wideband signal scarcity

   • Number of minimum samples

   • Complex due to estimation characteristics

   • Pre-planned number of samples

   • Restrained recovery error

   • High computation complexity

   • Decrease complexity

   • scarcity estimation not required

   • Measurement based directrecovery.

   • Reduced performance in detection probability

   • Increased false alarm rate

   • Powerful to noise

   • Low complexity and calculation cost

   • Quick sampling

   • To less reliable

3. Acquisition-Based Models

In the acquisition-based models, the received signal is first subsampled and then it is compressed for further process [22]. Using various acquisition techniques like Random convolution, Random demodulator, Random filtering and compressive multiplexer this operation are performed in acquisition models [13]. To improve the performance of sub Nyquist spectrum sensing sequence architecture-based application is developed. In few research works are summarized in literature [14] for spectrum acquisition in which continuous to finite block is replaced with pseudo inversion process which reduces the complexity in computation. Later using Bayesian learning [46] based recovery algorithms are implemented uing sparse which further reduces the computation complexity. Similarly, various methodologies are introduced in the same line by focussing compression in the acquisition process. This helps to improve the compression parameter but lags in other cost functions of the network Regular parity check [07] matrix is used in compressive spectrum sensing to improve the sensing performance. It uses basic RPC matrix to evaluate the functions related to sensing process in the network. Though, the performance metrics are noteworthy, modified regular parity checker matrix is introduced by replacing basic on these, Table 3 gives a comparison of few acquisition models with its merits and demerits in detail.

Table 3 Merits and Demerits of existing acquisition models

S.No.	Algorithms	Merits	Demerits
1	Random Filtering	Relevant various compressive signal applications Structured measurementoperator Easy and simple implementation	Nonlinear Prior knowledge about filters reconstruction algorithm
2	Random Convolution	Implicit algorithm based on fast Fourier transform Physical system are suitable	(i)Unknown pulse structure which makes the application not suitablefor sparse signals
3	Random Demodulator	High rate ADC is notrequired Reduced noise and quantization errors	Slow reconstruction of signals Sampling high delay. Suitable for finite set of signals

CONCLUSION

Fully automated and independent spectrum conditioners can oversee the use of spectrum in an area, and regulate the use than a static stringent manual regulation of air waves. The new network architecture that merges network routing into wireless link and RF design can create a dynamic fluid wireless network without predetermined topology and spectrum allocation. Cognitive radio technology has the potential to address challenges associated with spectrum access. The key enabling technologies that may be closely related to the study of 5G in the near future are presented, particularly in terms of full-duplex spectrum sensing, spectrum-database based spectrum sensing, compressive spectrum sensing, carrier aggregation based spectrum allocation. we made a brief survey of the state-of-the-art wideband spectrum sensing algorithms. Finally, we presented several open research issues for implementing wideband spectrum sensing.

REFERENCE

[1] Zhang, L., Xiao, M., Wu, G., Alam, M., Liang, Y. C., & Li, S. (2017). A survey of advanced techniques for spectrum sharing in 5G networks. IEEE Wireless Communications, 24(5), 44-51.

[2] Gandotra, P., Jha, R. K., & Jain, S. (2017). Green communication in next generation cellular networks: A survey. IEEE Access, 5, 11727- 11758.

[3] Sharma, V., Joshi, S. (2021). Design of Hybrid Blind Detection Based Spectrum Sensing Technique. Journal of Scientific Research, 2020, Vol 12, Issue 4, p575.

Academic Journal. https://doi.org/10.3329/jsr.v12i4.46870

[4] Federal Communications Commission. (2012). Third Memorandum Opinion and Order in the Matter of Unlicensed Operation in the TV Broadcast Bands (ET Docket No. 04-186) and Additional Spectrum for Unlicensed Devices Below 900 MHz and in the 3 GHz Band (ET Docket No. 02-380); FCC: Washington, DC, USA.

[5] Caleffi, M., & Cacciapuoti, A. S. (2014, June). Database access strategy for TV white space cognitive radio networks. In 2014 Eleventh Annual IEEE International Conference on Sensing, Communication, and Networking Workshops (SECON Workshops) (pp. 34-38). IEEE.

[6] Ahmed Ebian, Bassant Abdelhamid, Salwa El-Ramly (2018), "New measurement matrix for compressive sensing in cognitive radio networks IET

Communications, Vol. 12, No. 11, pp. 1297-1306

[7] Thomas Moon, Hyun Woo Choi, Nicholas Tzou, Abhijit Chatterjee (2015), Wideband Sparse Signal Acquisition With Dual-rate Time-Interleaved Undersampling Hardware and Multicoset Signal Reconstruction Algorithms IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, Vol. 63, No. 24, pp. 6486- 6497

[8] Zhicheng Zhang, Xiaokun Liang, Xu Dong, Yaoqin Xie, Guohua Cao (2018), A Sparse-View CT Reconstruction Method Based on Combination of DenseNet

and Deconvolution IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 1407-1417

[9] Christian D. Austin, Randolph L. Moses, Joshua N. Ash, Emre Ertin (2010), On the Relation Between Sparse Reconstruction and Parameter Estimation With

Model Order Selection IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 560-570,

[10] Xiaoge Huang, Baltasar Beferull-Lozano, Carmen Botella (2013), Quasi-Nash Equilibria for Non- Convex Distributed Power Allocation Games in Cognitive

Radios IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, Vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 3326-3337.

[11] S.Palanivel Rajan, Review and Investigations on Future Research Directions of Mobile Based Telecare System for Cardiac Surveillance, Journal of Applied

Research and Technology (ELSEVIER), ISSN No.: 16656423, Vol. 13, Issue 4, pp. 454- 460, 2015.

[12] K Kaarthik, A Sridevi, C Vivek, "Image processing based intelligent parking system", IEEE International Conference on Electrical, Instrumentation and Communication Engineering, 2017, pp. 1-4.

[13] P.T.Sivagurunathan .,Wireless Body area sensor Networks Using meta heurist Algorithm Bioscience Biotechnology research communication , ISSN 0947-6455 Volume 11 Special Issue 1 ,Page number 50-55.Nov 2018

[14] P.T.Sivagurunathan. A New Nonlinear Companding scheme for Reducing OFDM signals, Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences ISSN: 0974-2115, JCHPS Special Issue 1: February 2017, Page no 154-157.

[15]. T.Sivagurunathan, An Overview: Fiber Optic Communication, Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences ISSN: 0974-2115, JCHPS Special Issue 1,Page number 163-167,February 2017.

[16] V. Sharma and S. Joshi, "A Literature Review on Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio Applications," 2018 Second International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS), Madurai, India, 2018, pp. 883-893, doi: 10.1109/ICCONS.2018.8663089.

[17] Rajalekshmi Kishore, C. K. Ramesha, K. R. Anupama (2016), Bayesian Detector Based Superior Selective Reporting Mechanism for Cooperative Spectrum Sensing in Cognitive Radio NetworksProcedia Computer Science, Vol. 93, pp.207-216

[18] Sharma, V., Joshi, S. (2021). Real-Time Implementation of Enhanced Energy-Based Detection Technique. Proceedings of the International Conference on Paradigms of Computing, Communication and Data Sciences. Algorithms for Intelligent Systems. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7533- 4_1

[19] Shree Krishna Sharma, Symeon Chatzinotas, Björn Ottersten (2014), Compressive Sparsity Order Estimation for Wideband Cognitive Radio Receiver IEEE

Transactions on Signal Processing,Vol. 62, No. 19, pp. 4984-4996.

[20] Suriya M., Sumithra M.G. 2021. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web Online First.

[21] Yue Wang, Zhi Tian, Chunyan Feng (2012), Sparsity Order Estimation and its Application in Compressive Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radios IEEE

Transactions on Wireless Communications, Vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 2116-2125.

[22] Dagne D.T., Fante K.A., Desta G.A. Compressive sensing based maximum-minimum subband energy detection for cognitive radios. Heliyon. 2020;6(9)

[23] Hsu C.C., Lin C.H., Kao C.H., Lin Y.C. DCSN: Deep compressed sensing network for efficient hyperspectral data transmission of miniaturized satellite. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Rem. Sens. 2021;59(9):77737789

[24] Amallainne V.K., Ebert J.R., Chamberland J.F., Narayanan K.R. An enhanced decoding algorithm for coded compressed sensing with applications to unsourced random access. Sensors. 2022;22:676689.

[25] V. Sharma and S. Joshi, "Design of Energy Detection based Multistage Sensing Technique," 2020 Journal of Scientific Research India , 2020, DOI:

10.37398/JSR.2020.640255.

[26] Tianheng X., Ting Z., Jinfeng T., Jian S., Honglin H. Intelligent spectrum sensing: when reinforcement learning meets automatic repeat sensing in 5G communications. IEEE Wireless Commun. 2020;27(1):4653.

[27] Jing Jiang, Hongjian Sun, David Baglee, H. Vincent Poor (2016), Achieving Autonomous Compressive Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radios IEEE

Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 65, No. 3, pp. 1281-1291.

[28] Karatalay, O., Erküçük, S., & Bayka, T. (2018). Busy tone based coexistence algorithm for WRAN and WLAN systems in TV white space. IET Communications, 12(13), 1630-1637.