Comprehensive Energy Audit for Bank (Technical and Cost Analysis)

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV3IS090512

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Comprehensive Energy Audit for Bank (Technical and Cost Analysis)

(Technical and Cost Analysis)

Nirajkumar S. Maurya

Pranay S. Shete

Abhay A. Dalal

Sandeep P. Thawkar

Asst. Professor

Asst. Professor

Asst. Professor

Asst. Professor

Dept. of Electrical Engg.

Dept. of Electrical Engg.

Dept. of Electrical Engg.

Dept. of Electrical Engg.

DBACER, Nagpur

YCCE, Nagpur

DBACER, Nagpur

AGPCE, Nagpur

Abstract An energy audit is a key for developing an energy management program. Although energy audits have various degrees of complexity and can vary widely from one organization to another, every audit typically involves- data collection and review, plant surveys and system measurements, observation and review of operating practices, data analysis. In short, the audit is designed to determine where, when, why and how energy is being used. This information can then be used to identify opportunities to improve efficiency, decrease energy costs and reduce greenhouse gas emissions that contribute to climate change. Energy audits can also verify the effectiveness of Energy Management Opportunities (EMOs) after they have been implemented.

Keywords Introduction, Overview of Energy Auditing, Detailed Analysis, Technical Supplement.

  1. INTRODUCTION

    An energy audit identifies where and how the energy is consumed in an existing facility, building or structure. Information gathered from the energy audit can be used to introduce Energy Conservation Measures (ECM) or appropriate energy-saving technologies, such as electronic control systems, in the form of retrofits. Energy audits identify economical justification, cost-saving opportunities that result in significantly lowered electrical, water and operating costs. An energy audit, therefore, is a detailed examination of a facilitys energy uses and costs that generates recommendations to reduce those uses and costs by implementing equipment and operational changes. An important part of energy auditing is energy accounting/bill auditing. Energy accounting is a process of collecting, organizing and analyzing energy data.

    For electricity accounts, usage data normally are tracked and should include metered kilowatt-hour consumption, metered peak demand, billed demand, and rate schedules. All of this information can be obtained by analyzing typical energy bills. Creating energy accounting records and performing bill audits can be done internally without hiring outside consulting firms. Also, while energy audits as a whole will identify excessive energy use and cost-effective conservation projects. Bill auditing will assist in identifying errors in utility company bills, beneficial rate and service options. It could provide an excellent opportunity to generate savings without any capital investment. In addition, accurate data from energy accounting/bill auditing is crucial to making

    informed energy purchasing decisions in a deregulated energy market.

  2. TYPES OF ENERGY AUDIT There are three types of audits that are described below.

    1. Walk-through (Preliminary) Audit.

      This is the least expensive. It involves an examination of the building or facility, which includes a visual inspection of each of the associated systems. Historic energy usage data are reviewed to analyze patterns of energy use and compare them with benchmarks for similar structures. The walk-through audit provides an initial estimate of potential savings and generates a menu of inexpensive savings options usually involving incremental improvements in Operation and Maintenance.

    2. Detailed (Comprehensive) Audit

      This involves a more comprehensive and highly detailed evaluation. Facilities, equipment, operational systems and conditions are assessed thoroughly and on-site measurements and testing are conducted to arrive at a careful quantification of energy use with associated losses. The energy efficiencies of the various systems are determined using accepted energy engineering computational techniques. Technical changes and improvements in each of the systems are analyzed to determine the corresponding potential energy and cost savings. In addition, the standard audit will include an economic analysis of the proposed technological improvements and ECM.

  3. DETAILED ENERGY AUDIT

    1. Time of the Day Tariff (Applicable for Maharashtra State Only).

  1. Present Situation:

    Electricity Consumption (from Feb -13 to Nov 13)

    1. From monthly Electricity Bill, it was found that Power Factor (p.f.) is maintained at (1.00) unity and hence, Bank is applicable for p.f. incentives (i.e., 7% of monthly Electricity Bill).

    2. For water pumping, there were two 3HP pumps (1 working and 1 standby).

    3. All electricity bills paid on or before date to avoid the penalty charges in current electricity bill.

    4. In Bank, Office, Loan Processing Section and Streetlights, almost all types of luminaries are of Compact Fluorescent Lamp (CFL), Fluorescent tube light (FTL). During Audit it was observed that, installed capacity of some lights was oversized but the lumens output was not effective with respect to watts/ lumens consumption. Details are shown in tables below-

      Area

      Fitting Type

      Fitting (Watts)

      Qty.

      Load (W)

      Lux Levels

      Corridor

      CFL (36X2)

      72

      2

      144

      220

      Bank Premises

      CFL (36X2)

      72

      41

      2952

      220, 160, 130,

      147, 142, 207,

      256, 214, 108,

      192, 193, 169,

      152

      CFL (18X2)

      36

      6

      216

      240, 140

      CFL (18X1)

      18

      17

      306

      140, 256, 214,

      220, 219, 200,

      252, 168

      Cabin -1

      CFL

      (36X2)

      72

      2

      144

      347

      CFL (18X2)

      36

      2

      72

      Cabin -2

      CFL (36X2)

      72

      2

      144

      275

      CFL

      (18X2)

      36

      6

      216

      Cabin -3

      CFL

      (36X2)

      72

      2

      144

      249

      Cabin – 4

      Tube Light

      + Chock (36W) +

      (15W)

      51

      2

      102

      109

      System Room

      CFL (36X2)

      72

      2

      144

      124, 169

      CFL(18X2)

      36

      2

      72

      135

      CFL(18X1)

      18

      1

      18

      Deputy Manager

      (Cash)

      CFL (36X2)

      72

      4

      288

      p>223, 224

      Locker Room

      CFL(36X2)

      72

      2

      144

      190

      Record Room – 1

      Tube Light

      + Chock (36W) +

      (6W)

      42

      5

      210

      260, 340, 270

      Record Room – 2

      Tube Light

      + Chock (36W) +

      (15W)

      51

      6

      306

      138, 35

      Stationar y Room

      Tube Light

      + Chock (36W) +

      (15W)

      51

      4

      204

      156, 135

      Staff Canteen

      CFL (18X2)

      18

      6

      108

      246

      Bathroom

      Tube Light (36W + 6W)

      42

      4

      168

      245

      CFL (18W)

      18

      1

      18

      214

      Total KW

      6.12

      Table 1. Detailed Lighting Breakup: Bank

      1Table 2: Detailed Lighting Breakup: OFFICE

      Area

      Fitting Type

      Fitting (Watts)

      Qty.

      Load (W)

      Lux Levels

      Corridor

      Tube Light + Chock (36W) +

      (6W)

      42

      2

      84

      300

      Office Premises

      CFL (36W X2)

      72

      47

      3384

      240

      CFL (13 W)

      13

      45

      585

      133

      System Room

      Tube Light + Chock (36W) +

      (6W)

      42

      2

      84

      137

      Record Room

      Tube Light + Chock (36W) +

      (6W)

      42

      4

      168

      106

      Canteen

      Tube Light + Chock (36W) +

      (6W)

      42

      7

      294

      184

      Distributi on Panel

      Tube Light + Chock (36W) +

      (6W)

      42

      1

      42

      109

      Total Load (KW)

      4.641

      Table 3: Detailed Lighting Breakup: Street Lights

      Area

      Fitting Type

      Fitting (Watts)

      Qty.

      Load

      Lux Levels

      Street Lights

      Tube Light (28W)

      28

      7

      196

      115

      Tube Light +

      Chock (36W + 6W)

      42

      2

      84

      72

      CFL (30W)

      30

      22

      660

      107

      Total

      kW

      0.94

      Table 4: Detailed Lighting Breakup: ATM

      Area

      Fitting Type

      Fitting

      (Watts)

      Qty.

      Load

      Lux

      Levels

      ATM

      Lumi narie s

      Tube Light +

      Choke (36W + 6W)

      42

      1

      42

      104

      CFL (30W)

      30

      1

      30

      372

      CFL (18W)

      18

      8

      144

      CFL (5W)

      5

      8

      40

      Total

      kW

      0.256

    5. . It was also observed that, almost all Duct Air Conditioners (ACs) (5 in nos. and has a capacity of 5.5 TR – Ton of Refrigeration each) operated below 20 0 C which is wrong practice, this may happen due to inadequate cooling effect with respect to the area. Only 4 ACs were in operation. One of AC was not in Operation / under maintenance. It is therefore needs proper maintenance on regular basis to get the designed cooling effect.

      Area

      AC Type

      Qty.

      Rated TR/Unit

      Total TR

      Rated EER

      Bank

      Split AC

      5

      1.5

      7.5

      2.35

      Cassette

      AC

      5

      5.5

      27.5

      2.35

      OFFICE

      Split AC

      19

      1.5

      28.5

      2.69

      ATM

      Split AC

      2

      1.5

      3

      2.35

      Loan Processing Section

      Split AC

      3

      1.5

      4.5

      3.00

      Total

      34

      71

      Table 5. Detailed breakup of AC consumption

      1. It was found that Bank had paid the entire monthly electricity bill before date and eligible for the prompt payment incentives.

      2. Old and inefficient lights can be replaced by energy efficient lights (LED lights) which can save power (Watts) and gives more light compared with existing luminaries. Occupancy sensor can also provide the best suited solution for the less occupied areas or for the cabins. Detailed analysis of savings by using energy efficient lighting as shown in table below-

      1. In almost all cabins ACs are ON and doors were found open continuously and the set temperature was found 220C – 23 0C.

      2. It was analyzed that in energy consumption in C-Zone & D-Zone is more than that of A-Zone & B-Zone (as shown in Table 1). Bank has to pay more charges from Evening 06:00

      p.m. to 10:00 p.m. of 80 paisa/unit (applicable for the units consumed in this zone only).

  2. PROPOSED SITUATION:

  1. Automatic Power Saver reduces the voltage of about 5% that does not cause a proportional reduction in light output. The light output reduced is marginally by 2%, but there is a substantial reduction of about 10-25% in power consumption. Similarly, a higher voltage does not give proportionally higher light output, but the power consumed is substantially high.

  2. Level controller should operate when the level goes down below the prescribed limit; due to that sometimes it avoided operating in peak hrs. (i.e., C-Zone and D-Zone). Bank can make the schedule in such a way that, water tank should be fulfilled during off peak hrs. (i.e., Table 2: Water Pump from 10 p.m. to 9 a.m. or from 12 noon to 06 p.m.) On regular basis. Detailed analysis along with saving as shown in table below-

Table 7: Energy saving by using Energy Efficient Lights

Sectors

Existing

Replace by

Type

Watt/ Light

Nos

.

Total Watts

Type

Watts

Nos.

Total Watts

Bank

FTL (36W

+15W

)

51

16

816

LED

22

13

286

FTL (36W

+ 6W)

42

9

378

LED

22

7

154

CFL

Fittin g (36W

X 2)

72

57

4104

LED

40

57

2280

CFL

18

63

1134

LED

9

50

450

ATM

CFL

30

1

30

LED

15

1

15

CFL

18

8

144

LED

9

4

36

CFL

5

8

40

LED

3

0

0

FTL

42

1

42

LED

22

1

22

Street Lights

FTL

42

2

84

LED

22

2

44

CFL

30

22

660

LED

15

22

330

CFL

28

7

196

LED

15

7

105

OFFIC E

CFL

13

45

585

LED

8

45

360

CFL (36X2

)

72

47

3384

LED

25

47

1175

FTL

42

16

672

LED

22

16

352

Loan Proces sing Build.

FTL (40W

+ 15W)

55

5

275

LED

22

4

88

FTL (36W

+ 6W)

51

3

153

LED

22

2

44

CFL

20

1

20

LED

22

1

22

Cantee

n -1

CFL

18

12

216

LED

9

12

108

Cantee n 2

FTL

42

7

294

LED

22

5

110

330

13227

296

5981

Hrs. of Operation is Considered as 8 Hrs. Per Day & 25 Days per month.

Total kWh /month

2645.4

Total kWh consumed / year

31744.8

Total kWh / month

1196.2

Total KWh consumed / year

14354.4

Annualized Savings in KWh

17390.4

kW

Annualized Savings in Rs.

189729.3

Rs.

Investment for LED Lights

358860

Rs.

Simple Pay Back Period

1.9

Yrs.

Table 6: Analysis of Water pumps

Area

Water Pump

Nos.

2

Details / Pump

3 HP (2.238 kW)

Operating Hrs./ Day

2

Units Consumed / Month

112

Monthly Savings Rs.

212.61

Annualized Savings in Rs.

2551.32

  1. The effective BEE star rating of HVAC system (Split units & Cassette ACs) based on EER of 2.35 Voltas, 2.69 Logicool. Following table shows types of ACs, designed TR & EER capacity:

    Table 8: Analysis of AC consumption – Bank

    Area

    AC Type

    Qty.

    Rated TR/Unit

    Total TR

    Rated EER

    Bank

    Split AC

    5

    1.5

    7.5

    2.35

    Cassette

    AC

    5

    5.5

    27.5

    3.0

    Total

    10

    35

    Floor Area

    4500

    ft2

    Installed TR/unit area

    0.0078

    TR/ft2

    Total Recorded Power (22 TR Load)

    27.26

    kW/Hr

    Avg. Measured kW/TR

    1.24

    kW/TR

    Avg. Measured EER

    2.83

    EER

    Table 9: Analysis of AC Consumption Office

    Area

    AC Type

    Qty.

    Rated TR/Unit

    Total TR

    Rated EER

    Bank

    Split AC

    5

    1.5

    7.5

    2.35

    Cassette

    AC

    5

    5.5

    27.5

    3.0

    Total

    10

    35

    Floor Area

    4500

    ft2

    Installed TR/unit area

    0.0078

    TR/ft2

    Total Recorded Power (22 TR Load)

    27.26

    kW/Hr

    Avg. Measured kW/TR

    1.24

    kW/TR

    Avg. Measured EER

    2.83

    EER

    Table 10: Saving Analysis

    Area

    Bank

    OFFICE

    Bank and Office

    AC Type

    Cassette

    Split

    Qty.

    4

    11

    Rated TR/Unit

    5.5

    1.5

    Total TR

    22

    16.5

    Rated EER

    3

    2.69

    Measured EER

    2.83

    2.65

    Difference in

    EER

    0.17

    0.04

    Saving in kW

    1.64

    0.32996

    Annualized

    Saving in Rs.

    53596

    10800

    Total Annualized Saving

    64396

    Rs.

  2. It was suggested that all the doors should remain closed when ACs are in operation and the emperature should be set to 24250 C. As if by increasing 10 C temperatures thereby we can save Rs. 1 per hour.

  3. It is proposed, that reduce / stop consumption in C-Zone & D-Zone (i.e., from 18:00 to 22:00 Hrs).

Table 11: Present situation of C & D zone consumption Analysis

Month

C Zone

D Zone

09-12 hrs.

18-22 hrs.

0.80 (Rs. /kWh)

1.10 (Rs. /kWh)

Dem and

Units Consume

d

Charge s (Rs.)

Deman d

Units Consu

med

Charge s (Rs.)

FEB 13

47

1622

1297.6

28

1628

1790.8

Mar 13

67

2372

1897.6

36

1885

2073.5

April 13

72

2950

2360

48

2620

2882

May 13

96

3791

3032.8

67

2293

25522

June 13

86

3084

2467.2

47

2066

2272.6

July 13

61

2583

2066.4

50

1794

1973.4

Aug 13

55

2288

1830.4

29

1513

1664.3

Sep 13

68

3106

2484.8

52

1874

2061.4

Oct 13

65

2890

2312

48

1850

2035

Nov13

60

2328

1862

38

1594

1753.4

Total

27014

21610

19117

44028

Total Units

Consumed in Zone (B & C)

46131

Total Charges (Rs.) paid

65639

Stopping of units/ month from C-Zone

476

Stopping of units from D-Zone to A Zone

3434

Total Units Shifting / Month

3910

Total Charges (Rs.) Saved by units shifting /

month

42658

Annualized Saving (Rs.)

511897

Investment

Nil

In the Bank, Office & Loan processing , major loads comprises of AC units (5.5 Ton each, 1.5 ton) can be operate only in 12 p.m. to 18 p.m. which saves lot of energy by shifting AC consumption from C- Zone (i.e., from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.) to B-zone (i.e., 12 p.m. to 18 p.m.). As in the C- zone, SBI has to pay 80 paisa per unit more, whereas operation in the B-zone (i.e., from 12 p.m. to 18 p.m.) Rs. 0 (zero) per unit will be charged. Above table shows the annualized savings due to shifting of load (energy usage) from C-zone (from 9 a.m. to 12 p.m.) & D-zone (from 18

p.m. to 22 p.m.) to A-zone (from 22 p.m. to 6 a.m.) & B-zone (from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m. & 12 p.m. to 18 p.m.).

With the extend of this it was advised that all the PCs (monitor) in bank should turned OFF whenever not required, otherwise the monitor consumes about 10 to 12 Watts / Hr and hence large amount of Energy can be saved with this energy efficient practice.

IV. CONCLUSION

Any Comprehensive Energy Audit was in no case a fault finding exercise but to provide & updates on latest technological developments & energy efficient equipments for which energy efficiency benchmarking has already been established with success. The focus however, must be on NO/LOW investment ideas which should be encashed on top priority. Total annualized saving is Rs. 7,68,575/- with the investment of Rs. 3,58,860/- and payback period is up to six to seven months. Therefore it is conclude that about 45% proposals are without investment proposals and rests proposals having overall payback less than a year.

V REFERENCES

  1. Vivek Gilani, Preliminary Energy Audit Report ICICI Bank, January 2013, pp. 1-21.

  2. www.energymanagertraining.com

  3. Ana María Ruz – Fundación Chile and Luis Hinojosa POCH, "Energy Audits Good Practice Guide", for International Development Bank – Multilateral Investment Fund, pp. 1-47, February 2013.

  4. Malkiat Singh, Gurpreet Singh, Harmandeep Singh, "Energy Audit

: A case study to reduce the lighting cost", in AJCSIT 2: 5 (2012)

Leave a Reply