Compression of Surface Waves in a Microstrip Patch Antenna using Frequency Selective Surface

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV5IS050232

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

  • Open Access
  • Total Downloads : 363
  • Authors : Vaibhav Pant, Parakh Tomar, Rajat Agrawal, Rahul Mishra
  • Paper ID : IJERTV5IS050232
  • Volume & Issue : Volume 05, Issue 05 (May 2016)
  • DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV5IS050232
  • Published (First Online): 11-05-2016
  • ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
  • Publisher Name : IJERT
  • License: Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Text Only Version

Compression of Surface Waves in a Microstrip Patch Antenna using Frequency Selective Surface

Mr. Rahul Mishra

Assistant Professor Vaibhav Pant

Department of Electrical & Electronics Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering

GCET, Greater Noida GCET, Greater Noida

Rajat Agrawal Parakh Tomar

Department of Electrical & Electronics Department of Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering

GCET, Greater Noida GCET, Greater Noida

Abstract—With the increasing modernization of wireless and mobile communication the use of microstrip patch antenna has become popular. The reason being its ease of analysis, negligible weight, economical and can be easily manufactured using Printed Circuit Board (PCB) technology. Despite of having so many advantages it has several drawbacks such as low gain, restricted bandwidth and low efficiency. In this paper, the Frequency Selective Surface (FSS) is used to improve the performance of microstrip patch antenna by compressing the surface waves. The comparison of proposed antenna is made with the conventional patch antenna in the same physical dimensions. The result in terms of bandwidth and return loss shows considerable improvement in the proposed microstrip patch antenna.

Keywords—Frequency Selective Surface (FSS); Gain; Microstrip patch antenna; Return loss

  1. INTRODUCTION

    With the rapid development in the wireless field, microstrip patch antennas have become appealing prospect to the antenna community. In recent years microstrip patch antennas have been widely used in satellites, aerospace, radars, biomedical applications due to its properties like light weight, economical, robust, compatibility with integrated circuits. Despite its several advantages, they have several limitations such as low gain, low efficiency, less directivity and restricted bandwidth [1]. These limitations have been eliminated using a probe fed stacked antenna, slotted patch antenna, stacked shorted patches have been proposed and studied. Bandwidth can be improved using thicker substrate by cutting slots in the metallic patch by using aperture coupled stacked patch antenna. The limitation of using this antenna is that surface waves will be supported and results in mutual coupling in the antenna.To improve the performance of the antenna, a Frequency Selective Surface (FSS) structure can be used [2],[3].

    Frequency Selective Surface consists ofeither radiating or non-radiating elements which act as a band stop or band pass filter respectively to electromagnetic waves [4]. FSS is a type of optical filter in which the filtering is achieved by the periodic pattern on its surface. The FSS helps in reducing the back lobe and side lobe level in the radiation pattern.The effect of an FSS on the performance of patch antenna depends on the periodicity of elements, geometry and the electrical properties of the substrate [5]. The application of FSS has beenwidely seen in reflectors, filters, antennas, polarizers, meta-materials, absorbers, propagation, and artificial magnetic conductors (AMC) for more than four decades [6]-[11].

    Basically, there are two types of FSS designs which are used worldwide. The first type is known as inductive FSS which works similar to a high pass filter and the second type is capacitive FSS which works similar to a low pass filter.

  2. DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS AND PARAMETERS OF MICROSTRIP PATCH ANTENNA

    Fig. 1 . Microstrip patch antenna

    The three important design specifications of Microstrip patch antenna are:

    1. Operating frequency (fr): The operating frequency selected for proposed design is 9.5GHz.

    2. Dielectric constant of the substrate (r): The dielectric material selected for proposed design is having a dielectric constant of 4.4.

    3. Height of dielectric substrate (h): The height of the dielectric substrate is selected as 0.8mm.

    Calculation of parameters

    1. Width (w)

      The width of microstrip patch antenna depends on the operating frequency, the dielectric constant of the substrate and the height of the substrate. All these parameters are specified by the user. The equation to calculate the width of microstrip patch antenna is:

      mm2having a dielectric substrate of thickness 0.8mm. The substrate used is FR4 Epoxy has a relative permittivity of 4.4. The ground plane has an L slot which is clearly shown in Fig.2.

      W = 1 2

      (1)

      Fig. 2 . Dimensions of antenna in mm

      µ0: Permeability of free space 0: Permittivity of free space r: Dielectric constant

      fr : Resonant frequency W: Width of substrate

      2fr µ00

      r + 1

      1. FSS DESIGN

        The geometry of proposed FSS structure is clearly shown in the Fig.3. The FSS consists of two layers. One layer is made up of fractal cross elements supported by another layer made up of dielectric substrate FR4 Epoxy having a thickness of 0.4mm [13].

    2. The effective dielectric constant

      Effective dielectric constant depends on the dielectric constant of substrate, height of substrate and the width of the antenna.

      eff = r+1 + r1 × 1

      (2)

      W

      W

      2 2

      : Effective dielectric constant h: Height of substrate

      1+12h

    3. Calculation of Length Extension

      Formula for the calculation of length extension is

      W

      W

      h

      h

      L = 0.412 (eff+0.3)( h +0.264)

      (3)

      Fig. 3 . Dimensions of the FSS

      h

      L: Length extension

    4. Length (L)

    (eff0.258)(W+0.8)

    X-FSS formed by the original crossed dipole

    Y-FSS of elements generated in the first iteration

    Z-FSS of elements generated in the second iteration. The dimensions of FSS are:

    l0=11.4mm

    The length of the patch depends on the operating frequency, effective dielectric constant, and width of the patch.

    l1=5.5mm 2l2=5.2mm

    Width of fractal crosses are based on the relations

    L = 1

    2freffµ00

    L: Length of patch

    2L = V0

    2freff

    2L (4)

    W0=0.4mm Wn+1=0.5Wn

    1. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS

      III. ANTENNA DESIGN

      In this paper, an open ended L slotted microstrip patch antenna is proposed. The open ended L-slot is combined with a rectangular patch fed by a microstrip feed line to form the required antenna. Due to the printed open-ended L-slot on asymmetric ground plate wideband impedance characteristic is produced and also the ground plate is greatly reduced in size [12]. The dimension of the antenna is 25 x 25

      EMPIRE XPU 7.03 is 3-D electromagnetic field simulator software which is used to obtain the simulation results of return losses for the microstrip patch antenna created with and without an FSS. It is based on the powerful Finite Difference Time Domain method (FDTD).

      A comparative study of the microstrip patch antenna with and without an FSS is done. Simulation results were investigated by checking the impedance matching with better than 10 dB return loss [14].

      From the observation, the resonant frequency of patch antenna with and without FSS is found to be near 9.5GHz for the impedance matching with better than 10dB return loss. Though the result shows that bandwidth has been improved near the frequency 9.5GHz for the patch antenna with FSS.

      Fig. 4 . Antenna without FSS

      The table below shows the results of patch antenna without FSS.

      Fig. 6 . FSS distance 2.1mm from patch

      S.No

      Resonant Frequency (fr) (GHz)

      Bandwidth (GHz)

      1.

      9.07

      -15.397

      0.847

      S.No

      Resonant Frequency (fr) (GHz)

      Return Loss(dB)

      Bandwidth (GHz)

      1.

      9.07

      -15.397

      0.847

      TABLE I

      Now let us examine the results of implanting FSS with the antenna. To find out the best result, it is necessary to find out the correct position of FSS from the patch.

    2. ANALYSIS OF PATCH ANTENNA WITH FSS We have started with the FSS distance 1.1mm from the patch.

      Fig. 5 . FSS distance 1.1mm from patch

      Fig. 7 . FSS distance 3.1mm from patch

      Fig. 8 . FSS distance 4.1mm from patch

      Fig. 9 . FSS distance 5.1mm from patch

      We see that till 3.1mm results are not very good, but from 4.1mm results begin to improve.We can show tabulated as,

      TABLE II

      S.No.

      FSS

      Distance from Patch (mm)

      Resonant Frequency (fr) (GHz)

      Return Loss (dB)

      Bandwidth(G Hz)

      1.

      1.1

      7.3

      -18.552

      0.294

      2.

      2.1

      7.3

      -15.994

      0.327

      3.

      3.1

      9.5

      -15.478

      0.448

      4.

      4.1

      9.5

      -22.978

      0.585

      5.

      5.1

      9.5

      -32.870

      0.890

      From the above results, it can be seen that the return loss and bandwidth begin to improve as we increase the distance of FSS from the patch.

      Fig. 10 . FSS distance 6.1mm from patch

      Fig. 11 . FSS distance 7.1mm from patch

      Fig. 12 . FSS distance 8.1mm from patch

      Fig. 13 . FSS distance 9.1mm from patch

      Fig. 14 . FSS distance 10.1mm from patch

      S.No.

      FSS

      Distance from Patch (mm)

      Resonant Frequency (fr) (GHz)

      Return Loss (dB)

      Bandwidth (GHz)

      6.

      6.1

      9.4

      -20.961

      0.965

      7.

      7.1

      9.3

      -19.65

      1.015

      8.

      8.1

      9.3

      -20.493

      0.970

      9.

      9.1

      8.4

      -13.991

      0.352

      10.

      10.1

      Hence, by seeing all the above results we can conclude that two particular structures are of our interest.

      1. When FSS is at a distance of 5.1mm from the patch, the return loss is maximized.

      2. When FSS is at a distance of 7.1mm from the patch, the bandwidth is maximized.

    3. VSWR CHARACTERISTIC For patch antenna with FSS at distance 5.1mm

      Fig. 15 . VSWR vsfreq for FSS at distance 5.1mm

      The obtained value of VSWR is 1.035 at resonance frequency 9.5GHz,which is better for antenna performance as VSWR should be less than 2. This value of VSWR shows good impedance matching and less radiation loss.

      For patch antenna with FSS at distance 7.1mm

      Fig. 16 . VSWR vsfreq for FSS at distance 7.1mm

      The obtained value of VSWR is 1.22 at resonance frequency 9.3GHz,which is better for antenna performance as VSWR should be less than 2. This value of VSWR shows good impedance matching and less radiation loss.

    4. CONCLUSION

The microstrip patch antennas are widely used in mobile communication systems. The basic aim of this paper is to design a conventional patch antenna and the patch antenna with FSS with same physical dimensions which can operate at 9.5GHz to study the performance of a microstrip patch antenna when FSS is added to it. Then from the simulated results, it can be seen that the performance is better with the patch antenna that is designed with FSS in comparison to the conventional patch antenna.

REFERENCES

  1. Mst. NargisAktar, Muhammad ShahinUddin, Md. Ruhul Amin, and Md. Mortuza Ali ENHANCED GAIN AND BANDWIDTH OF PATCH ANTENNA USING EBG SUBSTRATESInternational Journal of Wireless & Mobile Networks (IJWMN) Vol. 3, No. 1, February 2011.

  2. Chen,H,Y.Tao,Y.Performance Improvement of a U-Slot Patch Antenna Using a Dual-Band Frequency Selective Surface with Modified Jerusalem Cross Elements IEEE Transactions On Antennas And Propagation, Vol. 59, No. 9, September 2011

  3. Chen, H.Y.; Tao, Y.; Hung, K.L.; Chou, H.T.; (2010) Bandwidth Enhancement Using Dual-Band Frequency Surface with Jerusalem Cross Elements 2.4/5.8 GHz WLAN Antennas, IEEE Int. conf. on Wireless Information Technology and Systems (ICWITS),1 4.

  4. Barlevy, A.S.; Rahmat-Samii, Y. (2001) Characterization of electromagnetic band-gap composed of multiple periodic tripods with interconnecting vias: concept analysis, and design, IEEE Trans. Ant.

    Prop., vol. 49, 242353

  5. SagarShinde,Dr.Rajkumar , Prof. Yelalwar Frequency Selective Surface to Improve the Gain ofthe Patch Antenna International Journal of Advances in Electrical and Electronics Engineering.ISSN: 2319-1112 /V2N1:64-67 ©IJAEEE

  6. Dinesh Yadav, L-Slotted Rectangular Microstrip Patch Antenna, Communication Systems and Network Technologies (CSNT), 3-5 June 2011, pp. 220 223.

  7. Hsing-Yi Chen and Yu Tao, Performance Improvement of a U-Slot Patch Antenna Using a Dual-Band Frequency Selective Surface With Modified Jerusalem Cross Elements, IEEE Trans. Antenna Propagation, Vol. 59, No. 9, September 2011, pp. 3482-3486.

  8. YongxingChe, XinyuHou, PengZhang,Design of Multiple FSS Screens with Dissimilar Periodicities for Directivity Enhancement of A Dual-band Patch Antenna, Antennas Propagation and EM Theory(ISAPE), 29 November 2010-2 December 2010, pp. 319-322.

  9. JC Batchelor, E.A. Parker, B. Sanz-Izquierdo, J.-B. Robertson, I.T. Ekpo and A.G. Williamson, Designing FSS for Wireless Propagation Control within Buildings, Antennas & Propagation Conference, LAPC 2009, Loughborough, Vol. 39, No. 16-17 November 2009, pp.14-17.

  10. Xiaoang Li, Chao Li,Design of High Gain Multiple U-Slot Microstrip Patch Antenna for Wireless System, Computational Problem-Solving (ICCP), 3-5 December 2010, pp. 256-259.

  11. Y. Ranga, L. Matekovits, Karu P. Esselle and Andrew R. Weily,Enhanced Gain UWB Slot Antenna with Multilayer Frequency- Selective Surface Reflector, Antenna Technology (iWAT), 7-9 March 2011, pp. 176-179.

  12. Song ,K; Yin , Y-Z; Fan, S.T.;Chen, B.; (2011) Compact Open-Ended L-Shaped Slot Antenna With Asymmetrical Rectangular Patch For UWB Applications Progress In Electromagnetics Research C, Vol. 19, 235243, 2011.

  13. Gonzalo, R.; De Maagt, P.; Sorolla, M.; (1999) Enhanced patch- antenna performance by suppressing surface waves using photonic- bandgap substrates, IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech.,Vol. 47, No 11,21312138.

  14. Joumayly,M,A,A.; Behdad, N.; A Low Profile Second-Order Frequenc Selective Surface with Miniaturized Elements

Leave a Reply