Conditions On DR – Group

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV1IS7232

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Conditions On DR – Group

Dr. M. Jeyalakshmi Assistant Professor in Mathematics

Alagappa Govt. Arts College, Karaikudi 630 003

Abstract: In this paper we introduce that an – group, Brouwerian Algebra and Boolean ring can be realized from a DR – group by some specialization.

Key words: – group, Brouwerian Algebra, Boolean ring, Residuated lattice, DR – group.

  1. Preliminaries Definition 1.1 [4]

    A non empty set G is called an group if and only if

    1. (G, +) is a group

    2. (G, ) is a lattice

    3. If x y, then a + x + b a + y + b, for all a, b, x, y in G.

      (or) (a + x + b) (a + y + b) = (a + x y + b)

      (a + x + b) (a + y + b) = (a + x y + b), for all a, b, x, y in G.

      Definition 1.2 [4]

      An group G is called a commutative group if a + b = b + a, for all a, b in G.

      Definition 1.3 [4], [5]

      A lattice L is called a residuated lattice if

      1. (L, .) is an group.

      2. Given a, b in L, there exist the largest x, y such that bx a and yb a.

        Definition 1.4 [1], [4]

        A non empty set B is called a Brouwerian Algebra if and only if

        1. (B, ) is a lattice

        2. B has a least element

        3. To each a, b in B, there is a least x = a b in B such that b x a

      Definition 1.5 [4]

      A ring (R, +, . ) is called a Boolean ring if and only if a . a = a, for all a in R.

      Definition 1.6 [4]

      A system A = (A, +, ) is called dually residuated lattice ordered group (simply DR group) if and only if

      1. (A, +) is an abelian group.

      2. (A, ) is a lattice.

      3. b c a + b a + c, for all a, b, c in A

      4. Given a, b in A, there exist a least element x = a – b in A such that b + x a.

      Definition 1.7 [4]

      A system A = (A, +, , ) is called a DR group if and only if

      1. (A, +) is an abelian group.

      2. (A, , ,) is a lattice.

      3. a + (b c) = (a + b) (a + c),

        a + (b c) = (a + b) (a + c), for all a, b, c in A.

      4. x + (y x) y,

      x y (x z) y,

      (x + y) y x, for all x, y, z in A.

      Remark [4]

      Two definitions for DR group are equivalent.

      Examples 1.1 [4]

      Commutative – group, Brouwerian Algebra and Boolean ring are DR – groups.

      Properties of a DR – group

      Now we see the properties of a DR – group which is already established in [4] .

      1. [(a – b) 0] + b = a b,

  2. a b a c b c and c b c a,

3. (a b) c = (a c) (b c),

4. a – (b c) = (a b) (a c),

5. a – (b c) = (a b) (a c),

6. (b c) a = (b – a) (c – a), 7. a b (a – b) + b = a,

8. a b + a b = a + b, 9. (a – b) 0 + a b= a,

10. a b a b = (a – b) (b – a),

11. a (b – c) (a – b) + c and (a + b) c (a – c) + b, for all a, b, c in A.

Theorem 1.2 [4]

The direct product of the DR – group is also a DR – group.

Theorem 1.3[4]

Any DR group is a distributive lattice.

  1. Realization from a DR – group Theorem : 2.1

    If A is a DR group and a + b = a b, for all a, b in A, then A is a Brouwerian Algebra.

    Proof :

    Given A is a DR group and a + b = a b, for all a, b in A. To prove A is a Brouwerian Algebra.

    By given, we have

    1. (A, ) is a lattice

    2. A has a least element 0.

    3. To each a, b in A, there exist a least element x in A such that b x = b + x a.

      Hence A is a Brouwerian Algebra.

      Theorem : 2.2

      If A is a DR group and (A, , ) is a Brouwerian Albegra, then a + b = a b, for all a, b in A.

      Proof :

      Given A is a DR group and a Brouwerian Algebra. To prove a + b = a b, for all a, b in A.

      Let a, b in A be arbitrary.

      there exist a least element x = a b in A such that b x a.

      We have y (x-y) = y x in any Brouwerian Algebra (1)

      a (a – a) = a a

      a a = a

      0 is the least element.

      By property 8, we have

      a + b = a b + a b

      a b + 0 = a b

      a + b a b (2)

      By property 8 a + b a b = a b a a b

      a b = (a b) [( a + b) (a b)]

      = (a b) (a + b), by (1)

      = a + b, by (2)

      Proposition : 2.1

      If A is a DR group, then

      1. a b 0

      2. a b = 0 a = b

      3. a b = b a

      4. (a b) (a b) = a b, for all a, b in A.

Proof :

Let a, b in A be arbibrary.

  1. By property 3.10, we have

    a b a b = (a – b) (b – a)

    = a b

    a b = a b a b (1) we have a b a b, for all a, b in A.

    a b a b 0 (2)

    Using (2) in (1), we get a b 0.

  2. Assume that a b = 0 To prove a = b

    Now a b = 0 a b a b = 0, by (1)

    a b = a b

    a = b. Conversely, assume that a = b To prove that a b = 0

    Now, a = b a b = a b

    a b a b = 0

    a b = 0, by (1)

  3. a b = (a – b) (b – a)

= (b – a) (a – b)

= b a, for all a, b in A.

(iv) (a b) (a b) = [(a b) (a b)] [(a b) (a b)]

= [(a – b) (b – a)] [(b – a) (a – b)], by property 10 [4]

= (a – b) (b – a)

= a b, for all a, b in A.

Theorem 2.3

If the symmetric difference is associative in a DR group A, then (A, *, ) is a Boolean ring and further

a + b = a b = a * b * (a b)

a – b = a * (a b), for all a, b in A.

Proof :

Given that the symmetric difference is associative in a DR group A. To prove (1) (A, *, ) is a Boolean ring.

(2) a + b = a b = a * b * (a b),

a b = a * (a b), for all a, b in A.

For (1) :

  1. For all a, b in A a * b in A: Let a, b in A be arbitrary. Then a * b = (a – b) (b – a)

    Now a, b in A a b, b a in A

    (a b) (b a) in A

    a * b in A.

  2. a * (b * c) = (a * b) * c, for all a, b, c in A:

    This follows by assumption.

  3. There exist an element 0 in A such that a * 0 = 0 * a = a, for all a in A:

    Let a in A be arbitrary.

    Since A is a DR group we have 0 in A.

    By associativity of *, we have

    a * (a* 0) = (a * a) * 0

    = 0 * 0

    = 0

    Therefore a * 0 = a, by proposition 2.1 (a * 0 ) * a = (0 * a) * a

    = 0 * (a * a)

    = 0 * 0 = 0

    Therefore 0 * a = a, by proposition 2.1

  4. To each a in A, there exist an element a in A such that a * a = 0:

    Let a in A be arbitrary.

    Then a * a = (a a) (a a) = 0

    Thus a * a = 0

  5. a * b = b * a, for all a, b in A:

    Let a, b in A be arbitrary.

    Then a * b = b * a, for all a, b in A, by proposition 2.1 Therefore (A, *) is an abelian group.

  6. For all a, b in A a b in A:

    Let a, b in A be arbitrary.

    Then a b in A, since A is a DR group Thus a, b in A a b in A.

  7. a (b c) = (a b) c, for all a, b, c in A :

    Let a, b, c in A be arbitrary.

    Then a (b c) = (a b) c, for all a, b, c in A, since A is a DR group

  8. a (b * c) = (a b) * (a c):

    (b * c) a = (b a) * (c a), for all a, b, c in A :

    Let a, b, c in A be arbitrary.

    For any x, y we have

    (x y) * (x ) = x * y, by proposition 2.1 (1) put x = b a and y = a in (1), we have

    [a (b a)] * [a (b a)] = a * (b a)

    Pre-multiply a (b a) on both sides, we get

    [a (b -a)] * ([a (b – a)] * [a (b – a)]) = [a (b – a)] * [a*(b – a)]

    ([a (b – a)] * [a (b – a)]) * [a (b – a)] = [a (b – a)] * [a*(b -a)],

    by associative law

    0 * [a (b – a)] = [a (b – a)] * [a *(b – a)], since a * a = 0

    [a (b – a)] = [a (b – a)] * [a *(b – a)], since a * 0 = a (2)

    But [a * (b – a)] = [a (b – a)] – [a (b – a)]

    = (a b) – [a (b – a)]

    = [(a b) – a] [(a b) – (b – a)], by property 4

    = (b – a) [(a b) (b – a)] by property 3

    = (a b) (b – a)

    = a b (ie) a * (b – a) = a b (3)

    Using (3) in (2), we get

    a (b – a) = [a (b – a)] * (a b)

    = (a b) * (a b) = 0, since a * a = 0 Hence a (b – a) = 0 (4)

    so that [a (b – c)] [(a b) c]

    = (a – [(a b) – c]) ((b – c) – [(a b) – c]) by property 6

    = (a – [(a – c) (b – c)]) [(b – c) (a – c)] by property 6 and a b a b = a

    = (a – [(a – c) (b – c)]) [b – (c a)]

    = (a-[(a – c) (b – c)]) [(b – c) (b – a)], by property 5

    < a (b – a) (b – c)

    = 0 (b – c), by (4)

    = 0

    so that a (b – c) < (a b) c

    But we always have (a b) c < a (b – c),

    since (a b) c = (a – c) (b – c) < a (b – c)

    Hence a (b – c) = (a b) c (5)

    Now, a (b * c) = a [(b – c) (c – b)]

    = [a (b – c)] [a (c – b)]

    = [(a b) c] [(a c) b], by (5)

    = ([(a b) a] [(a b) c]) ([(a c) a] [(a c) b]), since 0 = a (b – a) = (a b) a

    0 = a (c – a) = (a c) a

    = [(a b) (a c)] [(a c) (a b)]

    = (a b) * (a c)

    Thus a (b*c) = (a b) * (a c), for all a, b, c in A. Also, (b * c) a = [(b – c) (c – b)] a

    = a [(b – c) (c – b)]

    = [a (b – c)] [a (c – b)]

    = [(a b) c] [(a c) b]

    = ([(a b) a] [(a b) c]) ([(a c) – a] [(a c) – b]), since 0 = a (b – a) = (a b) a

    0 = a (c – a) = (a c) a

    = [(a b) (a c)] [(a c) (a b)]

    = [(b a) (c a)] [(c a) (b a)]

    = (b a) * (c a)

    Thus (b * c) a = (b a) * (c a), for all a, b, c, in A.

  9. a a = a, for all a in A:

Let a in A be arbitrary.

Then a a = a, for all a in A, since A is a DR group.

Thus (A, *, ) is a Boolean Algebra.

For (2):

Let a, b in A be arbitrary.

Then a * (a b) = [a (a b)] [a (a b)]

= a (a b), by absorption and associative laws

= (a – a) (a – b), by property 5

= 0 (a – b) = a b Thus a b = a * (a b), for all a, b in A. Now, a * 0 = a a 0.

so that a + a a, for every a and 0 a 0, for every a. Also, a + a = (a + a) * 0

= (a + a) * (a * a)

= [(a + a) * a] * a

= ([(a + a) a] [(a + a) a]) * a, by property 10

= [(a + a) a] * a, since a * a a.

= ([(a + a) a]- a) (a -[(a + a) – a])

= a [(a + a) a] Hence (a + a) a = (a – [(a + a) -a]) a

= (a – a) [(a + a) -a]

= 0 [(a + a) a]

= 0 a 0

a + a a Hence a + a = a

Now, (a + b) (a b) = (a + b) [(a b) + (a b)]

(a [(a b) + (a b)]) + b, by property 11

= [a – (a b)] (a b) + b

= [a – (a b)] + [b – (a b)]

0 + 0 = 0

so that a + b a b (6)

Since a 0 and b 0 and by property 8, we have a + b = a b + a b

(ie) a + b a b (7)

From (6) and (7), we have a + b = a b

Now, a * b * (a b) = a * [b * (b a)]

= a * (b – a), by property 10 and by property 5

= [a (b – a)] [a (b – a)]

= (a b) 0, by (4)

= a b = a + b

Thus a + b = a b = a * b * (a b), for all a, b in A.

References:

[1]. E. A. Nordhaus and Leo Lapidus, Brouwerian Geometry, Canad. J. Math.,6 (1954).

[2]. G. Birkhoff, Lattice Theory, American Mathematical Society, Colloguium Publications, Volume 25, Providence R. I., 3rd Edition, 3rd Printing, (1979).

[3]. K.L.N. Swamy, Dually Residuated Lattice Ordered Semigroup, Math. Ann. 159, 105 114 (1965).

[4]. M. Jeyalakshmi and R. Natarajan, DR group, Acta Cienca Indica, Vol. XXIX. M, No.4, 823 830 (2003).

[5]. M. Ward and R. P. Dilworth, Residuated Lattice, Trans, Am. Math., Soc. 45, (1939).

Leave a Reply