Design and Comparative Study of Plate Fin Heat Sink for Fan-less Cooling in CPU

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV5IS02014

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Design and Comparative Study of Plate Fin Heat Sink for Fan-less Cooling in CPU

Bhushan G. Pawar1

1ME Student, Mechanical Engineering Department,

Oriental College of Technology, RGPV, Bhopal, India

Kunal S. Marathe 3

Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering Department ,

  1. G. M. Institute of Engineering Education & Research, Nasik, India,

    Dharmendra Yadav2 Associate Professor,

    Mechanical Engineering Department, Oriental College of Technology, RGPV, Bhopal, India,

    Abstract Modern portable electronic devices are becoming more compact in space, The exponential increase in thermal load in air cooling devices require the thermal management system (i.e. heat sink) to be optimized to attain the highest performance in the given space. In this work, experimentation is performed for high heat flux condition. The heat sink mounted on the hot component for cooling the component under forced convection. The two different orientation of fan i.e. fan- on-top and fan-on-side are tested for different air mass flow rate and cooling rate is validated with numerical results for the same amount of heat flux. The numerical simulation is performed using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The primary goal of this work is to do the thermal analysis and comparison of fan orientation on cooling efficiency and to find the optimum parameters for a natural air-cooled heat sink at which the system will continue its operation in natural convection mode (i.e. Fan-failed condition). The CFD simulations are performed for optimization of heat sink parameters with objective function of maximization of heat transfer coefficient.

    Keywords – Heat sink, experimentation, computational fluid dynamics, heat transfer coefficient

    1. INTRODUCTION

      It is observed that components of modern portable electronic devices with increasing heat loads with decrease in the space available for heat dissipation. The increasing heat load of the device needs to be removed otherwise overheating situation could affect both the stability and performance of the working device. The exponential increase in thermal load in air cooling devices requires the thermal management system (i.e. heat sink) to be optimized to attain the highest performance in the given space. Over the past few decades there is increasing interest in the development of the heat sink process for heat dissipation and many design methodologies regarding optimization of heat sink have been proposed. Kyoungwoo Park [1] used Kriging method and CFD tool to an optimization of heat sink. Matthew B. de. Stadler [2] figure out difficulty in using fixed temperature boundry condition for hot surfaces and role of cellular materials while optimization of heat sinks. Some unknown Characterize the performance of several fan heat sink designs and find out a theoretical methodology that would accurately predict both optimization point for a given space as well as the performance of the solution. Dong-Kwon Kim [3] check the thermal performance of plate fin heat sink with variable fin thickness and observes thermal resistance was reduced as much as 15 % compared to uniform fin thickness heat sink. Adriano A.Koga.et.al [4]

      proposed development of heat sink device by topology optimization. Sidy Ndao et.al [5] concluded from multi objective thermal design optimization and comparative analysis of electronic cooling technologies that Single objective optimization of either the thermal resistance or pumping power may not necessarily yield optimum performance. The multiple-objective optimization approach is preferable as it provides a solution with different trade-offs among which designers can choose from to meet their cooling needs. The choice of a coolant has a significant effect on the selection of a cooling technology for a particular cooling application. Chayi-Tsong Chen, and Hung-I Chen observed that direction based genetic algorithm is very effective in locating the pareto front of the multi objective design The optimally designed heat sink by the proposed approach is shown to be superior in heat dissipation than those reported in literature. Lin Lin et.al [6] observes Increasing the pumping power, volumetric flow rate or Pressure drop can enhance the cooling performance of double layer MCHS, however this enhancement effect becomes weaker at higher pumping powers, volumetric flow rates, and pressure drops. Paulo Canhoto and A Heitor Reis [7] address the optimization of a heat sink formed by parallel circular ducts or non circular ducts in a finite volume and found that The optimum dimensionless thermal length and optimum hydraulic diameter were found for achieving maximum heat transfer density at fixed pumping power. Dong-Kwon Kim et.al [8] shown that optimized pin-fin heat sinks possess lower thermal resistances than optimized plate-fin heat sinks when dimensionless pumping power is small and the dimensionless length of heat sinks is large. On the contrary, the optimized plate-fin heat sinks have smaller thermal resistances when dimensionless pumping power is large and the dimensionless length of heat sinks is small. R.Mohan and Dr. P. Govindrajan

      [9] did thermal analysis of CPU with pin fin and slot parallel plate heat sinks with copper and carbon carbon composites. Ravi Kandasamy et.al [10] investigated application of novel PCM package for thermal management of portable electronic devices experimentally for studying effect of various parameters under cyclic steady condition. Maciej Jaworski

      [11] address thermal performance of heat spreader for electronic cooling with incorporated phase change materials.

      In this work experimentation is performed to find out better orientation of fan and no fan (Fan failed) condition the results of the experiment are validated by CFD .The objective of this work is to find out optimum parameters for naturally air cooled heat sink at which the system will continue its operation smoothly in natural convection mode. And comparisons of optimized heat sink with commercially available heat sink on the basis of various thermal and geometrical properties.

    2. EXPERIMENTAL SETUP

      Fig.1 represents the experimental testing set up which consist of a 80mm×60mm plate heater attached below the heat sink using a thin layer of thermal conducting paste Omegatherm 201.This attachment reduces the contact resistance and air gap between the surfaces, thus enhancing thermal conductivity during heat transfer. The heater can provide input power up to 80W to simulate the heat source. An adjustable DC power supply is connected to the heater. The maximum voltage across heater is 24V DC.

      Fig. 1. Front view of experimental set up

      The heat sink with attached heater is enclosed in a cabinet (280X150X180) and made of 5 mm thick acrylic, which has a melting temperature of 170C and a thermal conductivity of 0.2W/mK. Two axial fans of SIBAS (V=220 V, I=0.09 A, P=17 W, N=2500 rpm) are screwed to the cabinet casing out of which first one is mounted the top side of the heat sink and second one on right side in order to enhance the heat transfer. The heater is insulated from the casing using a backllite plate

      Fig.2.experimental set up

      The opposite end of each thermocouple is attached to multimeter in order to record the temperature of each thermocouple.

    3. PROCEDURE

      In this experiment the readings are taken for three main conditions i.e fan on side (FOS), fan on top (FOT) and no fan (fan failed) condition. Different heat inputs are given to the heater through power source and variac is used to regulate power supply and for giving different heat inputs. The tmperature across the components is recorded after steady state is reached. The experimentation is performed for the above mentioned conditions with varying mass flow rate of air and at different heat inputs.

    4. RESULTS & DISCUSSION

      In this experiment the primary goal was to study the heating effect in the system at different input powers and with different fan orientation (i.e. FOT and FOS). The first set of readings was taken for finding heat sink temperature at 25 W and 65 W resp. for fan on side condition, with varying mass flow rate of air. The same set of readings was taken for the fan on top condition.

      Table I

      Readings of Mass Flow Rate And Heat Sink Temperature At

      25w

      Mass Flow Rate(m3/s) Fan On Side Fan On Top

      of 10 mm thickness followed by mica sheet of 1 mm thickness

      0.0145

      53

      88.02

      and ceramic wool of 10 mm thickness. This prevents heat loss

      0.0217

      41.3

      81.96

      Heat Sink Temperature Heat Sink Temperature

      from the heater to the acrylic plastic casing. To study the natural convection phenomenon inside the test set up, upper surface has not given any insulation. Rubber O rings are placed on the both sides of the heat sinks before the device is sealed with M3 screws and epoxy. The metal screws hold the

      0.0434 31.7 69.2

      Table II

      Readings of Mass Flow Rate and Heat Sink Temperature At

      65w

      Mass Flow Rate(m3/s) Fan On Side Fan On Top

      heat-transferring blocks tightly to the aluminum heat sink in

      Heat Sink Temperature

      Heat Sink Temperature

      order to avoid the contact resistance due to air gap. The setup

      0.0145

      68.7

      90.4

      is placed inside a black box to reduce environmental effects

      0.0217

      59.1

      83.2

      due to lights, flows from air-conditioning fans and other disturbance. Four omega-type thermocouples are used for testing. First thermocouple is attached around the external surface of the heat sink. Second thermocouple is attached in between the heater and the heat sink. Third and fourth thermocouples are placed inside the cabinet near to the fans. The second end of each thermocouple is dipped in an ice bath for thermocouple calibration.

      0.0434 49.5 79

      Fig. 3. Temp. Vs mass flow rate at 25 W

      CFD Validation of Experimental Results

      For this study set of equations are solved. These equations are Coordinates (x, y, z)

      Time : t

      Pressure : p

      Heat Flux : q Velocity Components (u, v, w) Density :

      Stress :

      Reynolds No. : Re.

      Total Energy : ET

      Prandtl No. : Pr. Continuity Equation:

      X Momentum Equation

      Y Momentum Equation

      Fig. 4. Temp. Vs mass flow rate at 65 W

      From the above graphs it is observed that in fan on side condition max temp of heat sink is 31.7 C for 25 W heat source and 49.5 C for 65W heat source for given air flow rate of 0.0434. For fan on top condition max temp of heat sink is 69 C for 25 W heat source and 79 C for 65W heat source for given air flow rate of 0.0434. From the above results it can be concluded that Fan on side condition is best orientation condition for minimizing the temp of heat sink. Hence Fan on side condition is the best orientation condition for given experimental setup.

      Fan failed condition

      In most of the electronic components it is observed that when the temperature in the device exceeds the IGBT permissible temperature there may be unstable performance of the system due to improper functioning of fan (i.e fan failed condition). Further study is carried out to observe the behavior of the heat sink under no fan condition (i.e fan failed condition). The IGBT permissible temperatures and actual temperatures of component are recorded experimentally.

      Table III

      Igbt Temperature and Actual Temperature of Component At

      25w and 65w

      Z Momentum Equation

      Energy Equation

      Set of equations are solved using pressure based model. Staggered grid arrangement is taken for study. For pressure velocity coupling SIMPLE algorithm is considered. Second

      Power Input

      (W)

      IGBT Permissible Temp.

      ( C)

      Actual Temp. of the

      component ( C)

      order upwind scheme is considered for descretising the

      25 85 90

      65 105 112

      From the above table it is observed that actual temperature at the heat sink exceeds the permissible temperature of IGBT component. Same results are validated numerically using computational fluid dynamics study.

      momentum equation. For turbulence modeling K-E model is considered. For meshing the geometry, fine sgrid is used to near Fan, velocity boundary layer is need to be captured for getting accurate profile. Fine grid is also used near heat sink fins in order to capture thermal boundary layer. In rest of the domain where physics change is not prominent, coarse grid is used to save computational time.

      For Fan on side condition and at 25 W (IGBT)

      Fig. 5. Thermal image of Heat sink for Fan on side condition at 25 W

      From the above contours it is seen that maximum temperature reached is 29.7 C. Same Case when examined experimentally shows maximum temperature of 31.7 C.

      Fig. 6. Thermal image of Heat sink for Fan on side condition at 25 W

      For Fan on Top condition and at 25 W (IGBT)

      Fig. 7. Velocity vector image of Heat sink for Fan on Top condition at 25 W From the above contours it is seen that maximum temperature reached is 71.7 C. Same Case when examined experimentally

      shows maximum temperature of 69.2 C.

      For Fan on Side condition and at 65 W (IGBT)

      Fig. 8. Thermal image of Heat sink for Fan on side condition at 65 W

      Fig. 9. Velocity vector image of Heat sink for Fan on side condition at 65 W

      From the above contours it is seen that maximum temperature reached is 47 C. Same Case when examined experimentally shows maximum temperature of 49.5 C.

      For Fan on Top condition and at 65 W (IGBT)

      Fig. 10. Thermal image of Heat sink for Fan on Top condition at 65 W

      For 65 W

      TABLE V

      TEMPERATURE OF HEAT SINK IN EXPERIMENT AND IN CFD WITH

      ORIENTATION OF FAN AT 65W

      Temp. (Experiment) Temp.

      Fan Orientation ( C) (CFD)

      Error

      ( C)

      FOS

      49.5

      47

      5.051

      FOT

      79

      82

      -3.797

      NO FAN 112 115 -2.232

      Fig. 11. Velocity vector image of Heat sink for Fan on side condition at 65W

      From the above contours it is seen that maximum temperature reached is 97.37 C. Same Case when examined experimentally shows maximum temperature of 90 C.

      For 65 W

      Fig. 12. Thermal image of Heat sink for Fan Failed condition at 65 W

      From the above contours it is seen that maximum temperature reached is 115 C. Same Case when examined experimentally shows maximum temperature of 112 C. The results of all the above all configurations with respective error in experimental results and numerical results are tabulated below.

      For 25 W

      TABLE IV

      TEMPERATURE OF HEAT SINK IN EXPERIMENT AND IN CFD WITH

      ORIENTATION OF FAN AT 25W

      The tabulated CFD results show much similarity with the experimental results with minor error. It is observed that when fan is not working i.e. No Fan Condition, there is exponentional increase in the temperature of the heat sink. In order to withstand the fan failed condition above results drives our attention to a point where there is needs to optimize the heat sink. So further study is caried out to optimize heat sink for fan failed condition. (For Natural convection)

      Optimization of Heat Sink for Fan Failed Condition Optimization is performed with the help of CFD study. Optimization is carried out with varying fin thickness, fin spacing and no. of fins. On trial and error basis various configurations of heat sink design are obtained. Out of which two cases are presented below the second case gives best result for the optimized heat sink.

      TABLE VI

      OPTIMIZATION OF RESULTS OF HEAT SINK IN CFD

      Case

      No. of

      vertical fins

      Fin

      thickness (mm)

      No. of

      horizontal fins

      Fin

      Thickness (mm)

      Base Case

      3

      3

      4

      3

      Case-I

      4

      2.5

      5

      2.5

      Case-II 4 2.5 6 2

      Case-I shows the CFD simulation at given input powers i.e at 25 W and 65 W respectively. The temperature at the heat sink observed to exceed than the IGBT permissible temperature thats why case-I fails for the optimization of heat sink.

      At 25 W

      Fan Orientation

      Temp. (Experiment) ( C)

      Temp. (CFD)

      ( C)

      Error

      FOS 31.7 29.7 6.309

      FOT 69.2 71.7 -3.673

      NO FAN 90 97.37 -8.189

      Fig. 13. Thermal image of Heat sink (Case-I) for Fan Failed condition at 25 W

      At 65 W

      Table VI

      Optimization Results of Heat Sink In Cfd In Terms Of Temperature

      Input Power(W)

      Base Case (HS Temp)

      Case-I (HS Temp)

      Case-II (HS Temp)

      25 90 84 64

      65 112 111 95

      Same results are represented graphically. In this red line shows permissible temperature limit for given IGBT.

      At 25 W

      Fig. 14. Thermal image of Heat sink (Case-I) for Fan Failed condition at 65 W

      Case-II shows the CFD simulation at given input powers i.e at 25 W and 65 W respectively. The temperature at the heat sink observed to be much less than the IGBT permissible temperature thats why case-II gives the best optimized results for the given heat sink.

      At 25 W

      Fig. 15. Thermal image of Heat sink (Case-II) for Fan Failed condition at 25 W

      Fig. 18. Graph of Comparison of Case-I and Case-II at 25 W

      At 65 W

      At 65 W

      Fig. 17. Thermal image of Heat sink (Case-II) for Fan Failed condition at 65 W

      The optimized results in terms of temperature for all the cases and for No fan (Fan failed) condition are given below

      Fig.19. Graph of Comparison of Case-I and Case-II at 65 W

      From the above results it is clear that case II is the best optimized condition for given heat sink setup.

    5. CONCLUSION

In this experiment the primary goal is to study the performance of heat sink with different orientation of the fan. The experimental and numerical study is performed. It is observed that fan on side gives the better performance than fan on top. The main objective of this study is to find better configuration of a heat sink which can work smoothly even after the temperature inside the component exceeds the IGBT permissible temperature. Best optimized configuration of given heat sink has been found. This is achieved with the help of experimental & numerical study.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

I wish to express my sincere gratitude to my guide Prof. Dharmendra Yadav for guidance and help which had gone a long way in the process of completion of this paper .

REFERENCES

  1. Kyoungwoo Park., Park-Kyoun oh., Hyo-Jae Lim., The application of the CFD and Kringing method to an optimization of heat sink, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 49 (2006) 3439-3447

    ,Elsevier 2006.

  2. Matthew B. de Stadler., Optimization of the geometry of a heat sink, university of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA22904

  3. Kim D., Jung J., Kim S.,Thermal optimization of plate-fin heat sinks with variable fin thickness, International Journal of Hear and Mass Transfer 53(2010) 5988-5995,Elseveir,2010.

  4. Koga A., C Edson., Nova H., Lima C., Silva E., Development of heat sink by using topology optimization , International Journal of Hear and Mass Transfer 64 (2013) 759-722

  5. Ndao S., Peles Y., Jenson M.K., Multi-objective thermal design optimization and comparative analysis of electronics cooling technologies, International Journal of Hear and Mass Transfer 52 (2009) 4317-4326, Elseveir, 2009.

  6. Tsong C.,and Chen H.,Multi-objective optimization design of plate fin heat sink using a direction based genetic algorithm,Journal of the Taiwan Institute of chemical Engineers 44(2013) 257-265 Elesevier 2013

  7. Lin Lin, Yang Yang Chen ,Optimization of geometry and flow rate distributin for double layer microchannel heat sink,International journal of Thermal Sciences 78(2014 158-168 ELSEVIER

  8. anhoto P., Reis A., Optimization of forced convection heat sinks with pumping power requirements , International Journal of Hear and Mass Transfer 54 (2011) 1441-1447,Eleseveir 2010. PDCA12-70 data sheet, Opto Speed SA, Mezzovico, Switzerland.

  9. Kim D., Jung J., Kim S.,Thermal optimization of plate-fin heat sinks with variable fin thickness, International Journal of Hear and Mass Transfer 53(2010) 5988-5995,Elseveir,2010.

  10. R.Mohan and Dr.P.Govindrajan., Thermal analysis of CPU with Composite pin fin heat sinks, International journal of engineering science and technology vol2(9),2010,4051-4062

  11. S.C.Fok, W. Shen, F.L.Tan., Cooling of portable hand held electronic devices using phase change materials in finned heat sinks, International journal of thermal sciences 49(2010) 109-117,Elsevier, 2009.

BIOGRAPHY

Author 1: Bhushan G. Pawar:

Completed his Bachelor of Engineering in Mechanical, Master of Business Administration in Marketing and Human Resource from Savitribai Phule Pune University, Advanced Diploma in Industrial Safety from Maharashtra State Board of Technical Education and currently pursuing Master of Technology in Thermal Engineering from Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya University Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh.

Author 2: Dharmendra Yadav

Completed his Bachelor of Technology in Mechanical and Master of Technology in Thermal Engineering from Rajiv Gandhi Proudyogiki Vishwavidyalaya University, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, Currently working as an Assistant Professor in Department of Mechanical Engineering at Oriental College of Technology, Bhopal.

Author 3: Kunal S. Marathe

Completed his Diploma in Mechanical Engineering from Maharashtra State Board of Technical Education, Bachelor of Engineering in Mechanical & Master of Engineering in Mechanical- Design from Savitribai Phule Pune University, Currently working as an Assistant Professor at Loknete Gopinathji Munde Institute of Engineering Education & Research, Nashik.

Leave a Reply