Design of Coplanar-Waveguide-Feed Antenna

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV4IS070514

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Design of Coplanar-Waveguide-Feed Antenna

Sheng Peng

Department of Electronic Engineering Tianjin University of Technology and Education

Tianjin, China

Hongxing Zheng

Department of Electronic Engineering Tianjin University of Technology and Education

Tianjin, China

AbstractDesign of dual-band and ultra-wide band (UWB) with band-notched antennas have been discussed in this paper. These antennas are fed by coplanar waveguide. Structure of dual-band antenna has been proposed with corner-free rectangle and isosceles trapezoid; it can work efficiency in 2.32GHz ~ 2.57GHz and 5.2GHz ~ 5.8GHz. The planar UWB antenna has a band-notched characteristic for the interference between the UWB applications and WLAN, which can be used to reject the frequency 5.1GHz ~ 5.9 GHz by inserting a thin slot on the radiation element. The results in simulation and measurement showed that both of them have wonderful impedance bandwidth and radiation efficiency that it is a kind of good performance, easy integration antenna with practical value.

KeywordsCPW; UWB antenna; band-notched characteristic; planar antenna

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Printed antennas have attracted much attention due to the

  2. ANTENNA DESIGN

    1. Principle of coplanar waveguide feed

      As shown in Figure 1, the coplanar waveguide composed of dielectric substrate and three conduction band. Three metal etching conduction bands are in the same side of the dielectric substrate. The signal is in the between of the two ground part on the one side of the dielectric substrate, the other side is nothing. Coplanar waveguide structure generally adopts the high dielectric constant substrate, and the wavelength is less than 0 inside the waveguide, therefore the electromagnetic field is concentrated in the medium and the air interface. Alternating electromagnetic field generated between the metal conduction bands and the ground conduction band, can produce longitudinal and transverse alternating electromagnetic field. For traditional metal waveguide, only TE and TM mode are transmuted. Coplanar waveguide is used as transmission line to conduction TEM wave, as constraint conditions:

      advantages of wide bandwidth and ease to integrate with monolithic microwave integrated circuits [1]-[7]. Coplanar waveguide is a kind of planar transmission line structure [8]- [16], whose ground and radiation patch are on the same layer of medium plate. Various types of coplanar waveguide feed antenna have been reported to achieve the goal of multiband, broad band and miniaturization [17] – [23]. In [24], [25], the antenna fed by coplanar waveguide, can obtain good impedance matching between the radiation patch and feeder, and can realize 52% impedance bandwidth, by adjusting the distance between microstrip patch and ground plate, but it is a

      d 0

      in the formula, d = 2wf+s0

      .

      /(40 1/ 2 )

      single working frequency band, can not meet the requirement of current WLAN. In [26], the antenna has been proposed with symmetrical double trapezoid microstrip structure, which have advantage of uniplanar geometry and easier to fabricate than the design fed by microstrip line, however, the working frequency just in 5.6GHz ~ 11.3 GHz.

      This paper presented two kinds of antenna fed by coplanar waveguide, which has very wide impedance bandwidth and good omnidirectional radiation characteristics. Combining these two kinds of antenna, it can basically meet the requirements of various kinds of commonly used frequencies. The ultra-wideband antenna has a very wide bandwidth and wide application, while it has so many WLAN frequency of

      Fig. 1. the structure of coplanar waveguide

    2. Design of dual-band antenna

      The Dual-band antenna contains two resonant paths, one of then corresponding to the length (w1) of corner-free rectangle at the top of the radiation patch, which makes the antenna working at high frequencies, another one corresponding to the high (w4) of isosceles trapezoid at the bottom of the radiation patch, which makes the antenna working in low frequency band. By adjusting w1 and w4, the expected work frequency can be easily obtained in antenna. The valuables w1 and w4 are referred to as formula .

      signals used in the space, therefore the ultra-wideband antenna have a notch in the 5.1 GHz ~ 5.1 GHz frequency to avoid the interference of the WLAN. To make up the shortfall, the dual-

      w1,4

      c

      fl ,h e

      band antenna specially be designed for the application of WLAN. Both of the dual-band and ultra-wideband antennas could integrate with RF/microwave circuits easily, enabling a miniature hybrid or monolithic microwave integrated circuit.

      The structure of dual-band antenna is shown in Figure 2, the radiation part and ground plane were etched on coplanar sides of the FR-4 (r = 4.4 and h = 1.6mm). The width of the antenna (W1) is 26mm, and the length of the antenna (L1) is

      35mm. The antenna fed with coplanar waveguide, makes the antenna working frequency band has a good impedance matching by adjust the width of the feeder (wf) and the gap (s0).

      Fig. 2. configuration of dual-band antenna

      It is found that the impedance bandwidth of the proposed design can be improved by adjusting the bottom side of trapezoidal. As show in figure 3, the center of high frequency shift up as the increase of s0, while the center of low frequency be stay, Adjust the value of w1, the change of reflection coefficient S11 of antenna is shown in Figure 4. The Figure 4 shows that the changing of w1 affects on S11 a lot. With increasing of w1, the center of high frequency shift to the right, but it has less impact on the low frequency band. The figure 5 shows that l1 has a certain influence on both frequency bands, it can improving the bandwidth of the high frequency band with the increase of l1. The corner-free rectangle patch make antenna works at 2.32GHz ~ 2.57GHz frequency band. Changing the long side w4 of rectangular, it can be known by Figure 6 that w4 mainly affects the center part of the low frequency band, and the center part of the low frequency shift to the left with the increase of w4. When w4 = 21.5 mm, the antenna gets the optimal resonance at 2.32GHz ~ 2.57GHz frequency band.

      0

      -10

      S (dB)

      11

      s =0.6

      0

      -10

      S (dB)

      11

      -20

      -30

      0

      S (dB)

      11

      -10

      -20

      -30

      0

      -10

      S (dB)

      11

      -20

      -30

      -40

      w =4

      1

      1

      w =6

      1

      w =8

      2 3 4 5 6

      Freq(GHz)

      Fig. 4. S11 for different length of w1

      1

      l =6

      1

      l =7

      1

      l =8

      2 3 4 5 6

      Freq(GHz)

      Fig. 5. S11 for different length of l1

      4

      w =19.5

      4

      w =21.5

      4

      w =23.5

      2 3 4 5 6

      -20

      0

      0

      s =1.0

      0

      s =1.4

      Fig. 6. S11

      Freq(GHz)

      for different length of w4

      -30

      2 3 4 5 6

      Freq(GHz)

      Fig. 3. S11 for different length of s0

    3. Design of Band-Notched UWB Antenna

    The radiation patch of band-notched UWB antenna is composed of circular structure and semi-circular structures. Through adjusting the two center position and radius size to make antenna work in ultra wideband spectrum, at the same time, opening a slit in the middle of the patch to change the current distribution on antenna, which can realize band- notched feature on 5.1GHz ~ 5.9 GHz frequency band.

    0

    -5

    -10

    S (dB)

    11

    -15

    -20

    -25

    -30

    a=5.5

    a=7 a=8.2

    2 4 6 8 10 12

    Freq(GHz)

    Fig. 9. S11 for different length of a

    0

    b=11

    Fig. 7. configuration of Band-Notched UWB antenna

    -5 b=12.5

    b=13

    In order to get the prefect match, the distance of the coplanar waveguide (s02) must be adjusted to the appropriate value. As the figure 6 shows that when s02 = 0.2mm, the antenna gets the optimal resonance. The radiation patch consists of a semicircular and circular which overlap each other. To make the antenna works in ultra wide band by adjust the radius of circle (a) and the radius of semicircular (b). Figure 7 shows that with the increases of a, the reflection coefficient of 5.9GHz ~ 11.8GHz frequency band move down significantly. When a = 8.2mm, the antenna gets the optimal resonance. As show in Figure 8, the value of b also could be the important factors. Opening slit in the middle of the

    -10

    S (dB)

    11

    -15

    -20

    -25

    2 4 6 8 10 12

    Freq(GHz)

    Fig. 10. S11 for different length of b

    radiation patch can change the current distribution, at last achieving notch function. The band-notched are mainly affected by the length of gap m, as the increases of m in Figure 8, the band-notched obviously move to left. By adjusting the size of m to avoid the interference WLAN band, when m=15mm, the band-notched is in 5.1GHz~5.9GHz frequency band.

    0

    0

    -5

    -10

    S (dB)

    11

    -15

    02

    s =0.4

    -20

    -5 s =0.3

    m=14

    02

    -25

    m=14.5

    S (dB)

    11

    -10

    -15

    -20

    -25

    s =0.2

    02 m=15

    -30

    2 4 6 8 10 12

    Freq(GHz)

    Fig. 11. S11 for different length of m

  3. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    By optimization of the antenna structure, the dimensions

    2 4 6 8 10 12

    Freq(GHz)

    Fig. 8. S11 for different length of s02

    of the dual-band antenna and band-notched UWB antenna are showed in Table 1 and Table 2. According to the optimization parameters, the actual processing of the two antennas are shown in Figure 8 and Figure 9. Using high-performance RF integration AV3629 vector network analyzer to measure reflection coefficient S11 and VSWR of antenna, the measured results coincide with the simulation results.

    0

    -5

    S (dB)

    11

    -10

    -15

    -20

    Measure Simulate

    Fig. 12. photograph of dual-band antenna

    -25

    2 3 4 5 6

    Freq(GHz)

    Fig. 14. comparison between measured and simulated S11 for the proposed antenna

    4.0

    3.5

    VSWR

    3.0

    2.5

    2.0

    1.5

    1.0

    Measure Simulate

    Fig. 13. photograph of band-notched UWB antenna

    TABLE I. PARAMETERS OF THE DUAL-BAND ANTENNA (MM)

    2 3 4 5 6

    Freq(GHz)

    Fig. 15. comparison between measured and simulated VSWR for the proposed antenna

    W1

    L1

    wf1

    w11

    w2

    w3

    w4

    30

    30

    2.91

    6

    26

    4

    20.9

    l01

    l1

    l2

    s01

    s2

    h

    14.6

    7

    6

    1

    1

    1.6

    As shown in Figure 12, the radiation patterns were measured at frequencies of the three working frequency bands. H-plane patterns are round, which can send and receive signals in all directions. E-plane patterns similar to dumbbell shape, which shows that the antenna has good omnidirectional radiation characteristics.

    TABLE II. PARAMETERS OF BAND-NOTCHED UWB ANTENNA (MM)

    0

    -6

    -12

    150

    120

    90 60 E H

    30

    W2

    L2

    wf2

    w12

    a

    b

    m

    28

    26

    1.5

    3

    8.2

    12.2

    15

    n

    L02

    s02

    h

    0.2

    10.3

    0.2

    1.6

    -18 180 0

    -12

    As shown in Figure 10, the S11 parameter of dual-band antenna in 2.32GHz ~ 2.57GHz and 5.15GHz ~ 5.80GHz two bands are less than -10dB and the minimum values of S11 of the center frequency are below -20dB, which reached good transmission characteristics outwardly. As shown in Figure 11, the antenna VSWR is less than 1.5 in the above band.

    -6 210

    0

    240

    270

    1. 2.4GHz

      300

      330

      0

      -10

      150

      120

      90 60 E H

      8

      6

      VSWR

      30

      4

      Simulate Measure

      -20 180

      -10

      210

      0

      240

      270

      300

      0

      330

      2

      0

      2 4 6 8 10 12

      Freq(GHz)

      Fig. 18. comparison between measured and simulated VSWR for the

      0

      -10

      -20

      150

    2. 5.2GHz

      90

      120

      proposed antenna

      60

      E The radiation patterns were measured at frequencies of 4,

      H 7, 8, 9 and 10GHz in the principal E-plane and H-plane. For

      brevity, the radiation patterns are shown in Figure 17. The H

      30 plane pattern of antenna is performance for amplitude omni-

      directional in the 4 GHZ band. When the frequency is greater than 7 GHz, the direction graph edge no longer keep the

      -20

      -10

      180

      210

      0

      330

      maximum value and have small sag. The E plane pattern of antenna is an approximation of "8" glyph, which cross polarization amplitude is less than -20 dB in the whole band. The results show that the antenna satisfies the radiation condition in the whole work band.

      0

      240 300

      270

    3. 5.8GHz

    0

    -10

    150

    120

    90 60 E H

    30

    Fig. 16. radiation patterns of dual-band antenna at required frequencies.

    As shown in Figure 15 and Figure 16the impedance bandwidth is 9.1GHz within the frequency band of 2.7GHz- 11.8GHz, and the antenna has obvious band-notched characteristics in the frequency 5.1GHz-5.9GHz band which can effectively prevent the interference of WLAN.

    0 Simulate

    -20

    -30

    -20

    -10

    0

    180

    210

    240 300

    270

    0

    330

    -5

    S (dB)

    11

    -10

    -15

    -20

    Measure

    0

    -10

    -20

    -30

    150

    120

    1. 4GHz

      90

      60 E

      H

      30

      -25

      -30

      2 4 6 8 10 12

      Freq(GHz)

      Fig. 17. comparison between measured and simulated S11 for the proposed antenna

      -30

      -20

      -10

      0

      180

      210

      240 300

      270

    2. 7GHz

      0

      330

      0

      -10

      150

      120

      90 60 E H

      30

  4. CONCLUSION

The radiation patterns were measured at frequencies of 4, 7, 8, 9 and 10GHz in the principal E-plane and H-plane. For brevity, the radiation patterns are shown in Figure 17. The H plane pattern of antenna is performance for amplitude omni-

-20

180

-20

directional in the 4 GHZ band. When the frequency is greater

0 than 7 GHz, the direction graph edge no longer keep the

maximum value and have small sag. The E plane pattern of

-10

0

210

240 300

270

  1. 8GHz

    90

    330

    E

    antenna is an approximation of "8" glyph, which cross polarization amplitude is less than -20 dB in the whole band. The results show that the antenna satisfies the radiation condiion in the whole work band.

    REFERENCES

    [1] Hou Zhang, Planar antenna fed by coplanar waveguide, Xian

    0

    -10

    -20

    -30

    150

    120

    60 university of electronic science and technology press, Xian, 2014.

    H [2] Wen C P, Coplanar waveguide: A surface strip transmission line

    suitable for nonreciprocal gyromagnetic device applications, In: IEEE

    30 Trans. on MTT, 17(12), pp. 1087-1090, 1969.

    [3] Transl. J. Magn. Japan, vol. 2, pp. 740-741, August 1987 [Digests 9th Annual Conf. Magnetics Japan, p. 301, 1982].

    -30

    -20

    -10

    0

    0

    -10

    -20

    -20

    -10

    0

    0

    -10

    180

    210

    150

    180

    210

    150

    240

    120

    240

    120

    270

  2. 9GHz

90

270

(e) 10GHz

90

300

60

300

60

30

0

330

E H

30

0

330

E H

  1. Chair R, Kishk A A, Microstrip line and CPW fed ultra wideband slot antennas with U-shaped tuning stub and reflector, In: Progress in electromagnetics research, 56(5), pp. 15-17, 2006.

  2. Davis M E, Finite boundary corrections to the coplanar waveguide analysis, In: IEEE Trans. on MTT, Vol.21, pp.594596, 1973.

  3. Wei Wang, ShunShi Zhong, XianLing Liang, A broad CPW-fed arrow-shaped monopole antenna, IEEE AP-S Int. Symp, pp.751-752, 2004.

  4. Jun-wei Niu, Shun-shi Zhong, A CPW fed broadband slot antenna with linear taper, Microwa ve Opt. Technol. Lett., 41(3), pp.218-221, 2004.

  5. Kim Y, Kwon D H, CPW-fed planar ultra wideband antenna having a frequency band notch function, Electronices Letters, 41(7), pp.403- 405,2005.

  6. Qiu Xiao Ning, Ananda, Sanagavarapu, CPW-fed symmetrically modified ultra-wideband planar antenna, APMc2005, 2005.

  7. Sundaram A, Maddela M, Ramadoss R, Koch-fractal folded-slot antenna characteristics, IEEE antennas and wireless propagation letters, pp.219-222. 2007

  8. Huang C Y, Huang S A, Yang C F, Band-notched ultra-wideband circular slot antenna with inverted C-shaped parasitic strip, Electronics Letters, 44(15), pp.1143-1144, 2008

  9. J. J. Li, L. J. Yu, and W. Q. Du, Design of triple-band monopole antenna for WLAN/WiMAX, Electronic Sci. & Tech, 26(1), pp.62-65. 2013

  10. S. M. Yan, J. D. Xu, and G. Wei, A miniaturized triband printed monopole antenna for WLAN/WiMAX application, Journal of Microwaves, 28(4), pp.57-59. 2012

  11. K. George Thomas and M. Sreenivasan, A simple dual-band microstrip-fed printed antenna for WLAN applications, IET Microw.

    Antennas Proper, Vol. 3, pp. 687-694. 2009

  12. H. W. Gao, Y. C. Jiao, and F. S. Zhang, Design and study of 2.4GHz ISM band planar printed T-Shaped monopole antenna, Journal of Microwaves, Vol. 22(Supplement), pp.35-38. 2006

  13. X. D. Song, E. N. Feng, and J. M. Fu, A miniaturized CPW-fed dual

-20

-10

0

180

210

240

270

(f) 11GHz

300

0

330

band broad band monopole antenna for WLAN applications, Journal of Microwaves, 25(6), pp. 71-74. 2009.

  1. T. D. Nguyen, D. H. Lee, and H. C. Park, "Design and Analysis of Compact Printed Triple Band-Notched UWB Antenna," Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, IEEE, vol. 10, pp. 403-406, 2011.

  2. H.-W. Liu, C.-H. Ku, T.-S. Wang and C.-F. Yang, "Compact Monopole Antenna with Band-Notched Characteristic for UWB Applications," Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, IEEE, vol. 9, pp. 397-400, 2010.

    Fig. 19. radiation patterns of Band-Notched UWB antenna at required frequencies

  3. R. Azim, M. T. Islam, and N. Misran, Design of a Planar UWB Antenna with New Band Enhancement Technique Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society (ACES) Joumal, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 856-862, October 2011.

  4. J. William and R. Nakkeeran, A New UWB Slot Antenna with Rejection of WLMax and WLAN Bands, Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society (ACES) Joumal, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 787-793, September 2010.

  5. M. Naghshvarian-Jahromi and N. Komjani-Barchloui, "Analysis of the Behavior of Sierpinski Carpet Monopole Antenna," Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society (ACES) Journal, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 32-36, February 2009.

  6. Q.-X. Chu and Y.-Y. Yang, "A Compact Ultra wideband Antenna With 3.4/5.5 GHz Dual Band-Notched Characteristics," Antennas and Propagation, IEEE Transactions, pp. 3637-3644, 2008.

  7. M. Akbari, M. Koohestani, C. H. Ghobadi, and J. Nourinia, A New Compact Planar UWB Monopole Antenna, International Journal of RF

    and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 216- 220, March 2011.

  8. M. Akbari, M. Koohestani, C. H. Ghobadi, and J.Nourinia, A New Compact Planar UWB Monopole Antenna International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 216-220, March 2011.

  9. Congmin Wang, Xiangjun Gao, Technologies of broad- bandmicrostrip antenna, Electronic Warfare Technolo-gy, 18(5), pp.23-27, 2003.

  10. Juntunen J S, Tsiboukis T D, Reduction of numerical dispersion in FDTD method through artificial anisotropy, In: IEEE Trans Microwave Theory Tech, 48(4), pp.582-588, 2000.

  11. Wilson A, Artuzi Jr and Yongyama T, Charaterization and measurements of laterally shielded coplanar waveguide at millimeter wavelengths, IEEE Trans. on MTT, 42(1), pp.150-153, 1994.

Leave a Reply