Design of Shock Absorber Test Rig for Measurement and Analysis of Transmissibility

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV3IS10945

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Design of Shock Absorber Test Rig for Measurement and Analysis of Transmissibility

Nikhil S. Kothawade1, Amol D. Halwar1, Ajay I. Chaudhari1, Bhushan R. Mahajan2

1Department of Mechanical engineering,Amrutvahini COE,Sangamner,Maharashtra,India

2Department of mechanical engineering,Sir Visweswaraya Memorial COE,Chicholi,Maharashtra,India

Abstract

Shock absorber, an example of under damped vibration system is the key element in the suspension system of any automobile vehicles which aim to absorb a maximum amount of kinetic energy and sometimes potential energy. This paper mainly focuses on the measurement of transmissibility of shock absorber and its analysis at various loads and speeds. Transmissibility is a measure of effectiveness of the vibration isolating material. For the measurement of the transmissibility of the shock absorber a test rig is designed and developed. An experiment on the test rig is carried out at different speeds and loads which lead to the output in terms of sinusoidal waveform on strip chart recorder. The waveform is used to find out the transmissibility at different load-speed combination. The results obtained are used to find out the behaviour of transmissibility at different speed and loads.

  1. Introduction

    Driving comfort and manoeuvrability are the primary design objectives in development of an automobiles shock-isolation system which transmits fewer amounts of vibrations to the person sitting on the vehicle. Shock absorber subjected to the vibratory forces is a necessary component in the vehicle suspension system. It is an example of under damped vibration system; creating the vibrations under the external loading on it. It absorbs some amount of force, motion and transmits remaining amount of force and motion to the person sitting on the vehicle.

    Attempts have been made previously to find out the various shock absorber properties by various approaches.Rao and Greenberg carried experiment for measurement of equivalent stiffness and damping properties of shock absorber.[1] Y. Ping studied dynamic behaviour of an oil-air coupling shock absorber.[2] A K Samantray developed preloading mechanism for liquid spring /damper shock absorber and studied the shock isolation properties.[3] For nonlinear viscous damping device force transmissibility of multidegree of freedom is also studied by Peng and others.[4] Also simulation and experimental validation of vehicle dynamic characteristic for displacement sensitive shock absorber with fluid flow modelling.[5,6]

    An extensive work has been done on transmissibility of vibration isolator like SALIM vibration isolator [7],Pneumatic Vibration Isolator[8] which is used in various stationary applications. Yang Ping and other researched on dynamic transmissibility of complex non linear coupling isolator.[9]

    From the above literature review it is found that very limited work has been done on the force transmissibility of the shock absorber so far as the loading condition is concerned. This experimental research work presents a model to calculate the force transmissibility of shock absorber at various loading conditions. The principle mechanism for the basis of this test rig designed to measure the force transmissibility is scotch yoke mechanism(ref net). This mechanism converts rotary motion of the circulating disc into the linear motion of the shock absorber. At various loads and speeds combinations the readings on the test rig is taken with the help of bar

    graph recorder and by using the data available from the graphs in terms of amplitude the transmissibility at various load-speed combinations is calculated.

  2. Transmissibility

    The transmission of the vibration can be specified by the term force transmissibility.

    In order to reduce as much as possible the amount of force transmitted to the seat of the vehicle due to the vibration of the vehicle because of interaction with the roads, vehicles are usually isolated from the roads by means of wheels and suspension system which involves the shock absorber and the spring damper system in it. As a result the force transmitted to the seat of vehicle is the sum of the spring & the damper force of the shock absorber. i.e. Ft = kx + cx

    Force transmissibility is defined as the amplitude ratio of the transmitted force to the impressed force. The formula for the force transmissibility is given as per equation 1

    used is having an eccentricity of 2.5 cm. figure 1 shows the disc and its different views.

    Fig.1 Circular Disc

    3.2Mathematical Design

    3.2.1Maximum force acting on the roller:

    Motor Power = P = 0.5 HP= 0.37 KW

    Motor is run at 1500 rpm so that it can lift the shock absorber and also produces maximum torque.

    P=(2NT) / (60) (2)

    T =

    1+(2 / )2

    r [1(2 / )2]2+[2 / ]2

    (1)

    Where, P = Motor Power , N= r.p.m., T = Torque Therefore, (0.37×103)=( 2×1500×T) / (60)

    Where, r =( / n )= frequency ratio, = damping factor.

  3. Design of Test Rig

    1. Conceptual Design

      The conceptual design involves the selection of the standard parts required for the test rig as follows

      1. DC motor

        Specification: power = 0.5 HP =0.37 KW (1HP=746 Watt) Speed = 1500 rpm

      2. Strip Chart recorder

        It is used to record the motion of the shock absorber under different loading and speed conditions. Readings can be taken on the strip chart recorder with the help of the pen arrangement.

      3. Circular disc

        The disc used is to convert the rotary motion of the motor shaft into the linear motion of the shock absorber. To achieve this purpose the appropriate eccentricity is provided to the disc. The disc presently

        T= 70.66 Nm

        Torque is given as, T= F×R (3) Where, F= Force acting on roller

        R= Distance between the centre of eccentricity to the motor output shaft.

        = (0.04+0.012) m

        Therefore,

        70.66= F × (0.04+0.012)

        F=1358.84 Newton F=1360 Newton

        As total force acting downwards (Weight of the bushes

        +Max dead weight can be added) = 5+4 = 9 kg= 90 Newton is less than the force acting upwards (1360 Newton). So that shock absorber is easily lifted upwards by the disc.

        3.2.2Selection of Bearing

        The deep groove ball bearing is selected to convert the rotary motion of the disc into the linear motion of the shock absorber. The protruded rod of the disc is fitted into the inner race of the bearing and outer race rotates and converts the rotary motion of the disc into linear motion of the shock absorber simultaneously.

        Now from equation 3,

        Radial load (Fr) = 1360 N, Axial load (fa) = 0 N Assuming static load carrying capacity Co = 3550

        Fa / Fr = 0 & Fa / Co = 0 X= Radial factor Y = Axial factor So taking X = 1 & Y= 0

        P = X Fr + Y Fa

        Effective load = P =1360 N Assuming bearing life Lh = 8000 Hrs Life L = 60 n Lh / 106

        L = 60×150×8000 / 106 = 72

        L = ( C / P)3 For ball bearing Therefore, C= (1360 × 72 1/3) ×1.2

        C= 6789.39 N < 7800 N

        So design is safe.

        So we selected the bearing no. SKF-6202.

        Fig.2 SKF 6202 bearing connected with disc protrusion

  4. Specifications of the test rig

    The Detailed specifications of the various standard and manufactured components is given in the Table 1

    Table 1. Specifications of Test Rig

    Sr.

    No:

    Component

    Quantity

    Specification

    1.

    C Motor

    1

    P=0.5HP, 1500 RPM

    2.

    Circular disc

    1

    d= 195 mm, t= 12 mm

    3.

    Bearing

    1

    SKF 6202

    4.

    Shock Absorber

    1

    Bajaj M80(Moped), k=17000 N/m

    5.

    Bushes

    2

    I.D.= 37mm, O.D.=

    42mm,

    h= 76mm

    6.

    Pillar

    2

    d= 37 mm, h=960mm

    7.

    Connecting Plates

    2

    l=410 mm, h=76 mm

    8.

    C-Channel (base)

    1

    L= 920mm, b= 600mm,

    h= 78mm

    9.

    Solid bar(For back bush)

    1

    d= 43mm, h=450mm

    10.

    Rectangular slot

    1

    L= 160mm, h= 50mm,

    t= 6mm

    11.

    Eccentricity

    e=40mm

    12.

    Disc protrusion

    d =13mm, l=40 mm

    Fig.3 Test Rig and its ProE Solid model

  5. Experimental Procedure

Following steps are followed while conducting an experiment

  1. Connect all the set up equipment.

  2. Connect the motor to dimmer stat and the strip chart

    recorder to voltage eliminator.

  3. Assure the proper connection and check it once again.

  4. Now take the weights(in kg) and place it on the top of the bush on weight stand.

  5. Start the motor with the help of power supply through dimmer stat and measure the speed of the motor in RPM using the tachometer.

  6. Start the strip chart recorder and maintain the constant speed of it.

  7. obtain the readings (Sinusoidal wave) on the recorder and record the speed and the load at which it is obtained.

  8. Repeat the same procedure for various speed and load combinations and obtain the readings.

  1. Calculation

    The readings on the strip chart recorder for various load-speed combinations are obtained. The reading for the 49.05 N load and 120 rpm speed is shown below in figure 4

    Fig.4 Reading for load 49.5N & 120 RPM

    Similar readings are obtained for different loading and speed conditions with different peak to peak amplitude.

    A)Theoretical approach to transmissibility caWe know the following standard values for the Bajaj M80 shock absorber as follows:

    K=17000 N/m Cc=320 N/ms

    Deflection of the spring(x) can be recorded on the graph at various load-speed combinations.

    Now,

    Fdw= Dead Weight(Bush+ Shock absorber weight) = (3.5+1.5)*9.81

    = 49.05 N F1 = K*X1

    = 17000*0.00294

    = 49.98 N F2= F1+Fdw

    = 49.98+49.05

    = 99.03

    = 2*()*n/60

    = 12.57 RPS

    K= [K2 + (c ) 2](1/2)

    = [170002 + (31.94*12.57)2](1/2)

    = 17004.74 N/m

    Ftr = K * X2 = 49.82 N

    (Tr)Therotical= Ftr / F2 = 0.5031

    Where-

    F1= Dynamic force due to spring F2= Total dynamic force = F1+ Fdw

    Fdw= Dead weight(Weight of shock absorber=1.5 kg and weight of bush=3.5 kg is added while calculating the dead weight as it also contributes in the to the total weight.)

    Ftr= Transmitted force

    X1=Deflection of spring without dashpot. X2=Deflection of spring with dashpot.

    B)Practical approach to transmissibility calculation: Readings on the strip chart recorder in the form of sinusoidal waveform are taken. These readings are nothing but the representation of the force transmission. Line AB is supposed to be the centre line of the waveform but dut to the application of load and speed the centre transfers to the upwards and the new centre line will be the CD. Hence from the readings obtained we can calculate the transmissibility practically using equation

    (Tr)Practical=

    ( )

    /2

    For W= 49.01N and n= 120 rpm

    Sample calculation for load(W)= 49.05N and speed(n)= 120 RPM is given as below.

    (Tr)Peactical

    = 18 48/2

    =0.75

  2. Results and Discussions

    The results for the loads 49.05N(0 kg) ,68.67N(2 Kg), 88.29N(4 Kg) and speeds 120 RPM, 150RPM,and 180 RPM with their combinations is take. Results for practical and theoretical transmissibility are obtained. Table 2 shows the values of the inputs given to the test rig and table 3 shows the results obtained.

    Table 2 Input data to test rig and displacements obtained at strip chart recorder

    LOAD

    SPEED (RPM)

    FDW (N)

    X1

    (m)

    X2

    (m)

    0 KG

    120

    49.05

    0.00294

    0.00293

    150

    49.05

    0.00295

    0.00295

    180

    49.05

    0.00298

    0.00298

    2 KG.

    120

    68.67

    0.00409

    0.00409

    150

    68.67

    0.00413

    0.00412

    180

    68.67

    0.00417

    0.00417

    4 KG.

    120

    88.29

    0.00526

    0.00526

    150

    88.29

    0.00530

    0.00531

    180

    88.29

    0.00535

    0.00536

    F1 (N)

    F2 (N)

    FTR (N)

    TR

    (Pract.)

    TR

    (Theo,)

    49.98

    99.03

    49.82

    0.75

    0.5031

    50.15

    99.2

    50.17

    0.76

    0.5057

    50.66

    99.71

    50.69

    0.78

    0.5084

    69.53

    138.2

    69.55

    0.68

    0.5033

    70.21

    138.88

    70.07

    0.69

    0.5045

    70.89

    139.59

    70.93

    0.71

    0.5082

    89.42

    177.71

    89.44

    0.64

    0.5033

    Table 3. Practical and theoretical Transmissibility

    90.1

    178.39

    90.31

    0.66

    0.5062

    90.95

    179.24

    91.18

    0.67

    0.5087

    From the data obtained in Table 2 and Table 3 graphs can be plotted for the speed verses Transmissibility and Load verses Transmissibility. The graphs are given in Figure 5 and Figure 6.

    Fig 5. Graph of Load vs Transmissibility

    Fig 6. Graph of Speed vs transmissibility

  3. Conclusion

    Nikhil Sudhir Kothawade is pursueing his Mtech from VIT University, Vellore and has been completed his B.E. in

    Mechanical Engineering from

    1. From Fig.5 it is clear that as load increases at constant speed, the transmissibility of the system goes on decreasing practically. There is increase in transmissibility calculated by theory but it is nearly negligible.

      His are of interest is advance manufacturing methods and

      Production planning.

      Sangamner,

      of

      college

      Amrutvahini engineering,

      Maharashtra.

    2. From Fig.6 it can be concluded that when speed increases at constant load, the transmissibility of the system goes on increasing. Practically it shows the increase in distinct manner while theoretically it shows very small increase.

  4. Acknowledgement

has in from

of

Engg.

college

BE

his

completed Mechanical Amrutvahini

engineering,

Amol D. Halwar

The authors would like to show their deep gratitude towards Prof. Sandeep Fargade for his valuable support and guidance throughout the project work and paper writing.

Sangamner,Maharashtra.

He has teaching experience of

6 months in polytechnic.and his area of interest is the field of Manufacturing and Design.

9. References

Bhushan R. Mahajan is pursueing his M.E. from Pune University. He completed his

B.E. in Mechanical engineering from AVCOE

Sangamner,Maharashtra.

He has 2 years of experience in Industrial Automation.

[1]Rao and Gruenberg, Measurement of equivalent stiffness and damping of shock absorbers ,Michigan Technological University, pp. 1-3 [2]Y.Ping.Experimental and mathematical evaluation of dynamic behaviour of an oil-air coupling shock absorber, Elseveir, vol.17, Issue no.6,pp.1367-79,2003 [3]A.K.Samantray,Modelling and analysis of preloaded liquid spring/damper shock absorber, Simulation modelling practice and theory, vol.17,pp. 309-325,2009

[4]Peng et al., The force transmissibility of MDOF structures with a non linear viscous damping device, International journal of non linear mechanics, Elsevier, vol.46, pp.1305-14,2011

Sangamner,

of

college

Amrutvahini engineering,

Maharashtra.

Ajay I Chaudhari is pursueing PGDBM in SCM and has been completed his B.E. in

Mechanical Engineering from

[5]W.J.Hsueh.Vibration transmissibility of a unidirectional multidegree of freedom system and multiple dynamic behaviour, Journal of sound and vibration, vol.229, Issue no.4, pp793-05, 2000 [6]C.Lee, B.Y.Moon,Simulation and experimental validation of vehicle dynamic characteristics for displacement sensitive shock absorber using fluid flow, Sciencedirect, vol. 20,pp. 373-88,2006 [7]Gao,Chen,Teng, Modelling and dynamic properties of novel solid and liquid mixture vibration, vol 331, pp. 3695-09, 2012

His are of interest is Design Of

Industrial Automation

  1. Lee,Kim,A method of transmissibility design for dual chamber pneumatic vibration isolator,Elseveir,vol.323, pp.66-92

  2. Yang, Ding, Dynamic transmissibility of a complex non linear coupling isolator, Tsinghua Science and technology, vol 11 Issue no.5, pp538-42,2006

Leave a Reply