Detailed Study on Dissimilar Welding of Low Carbon Steel with AA1050 using TIG Welding

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS110481

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Detailed Study on Dissimilar Welding of Low Carbon Steel with AA1050 using TIG Welding

J.Pasupathy

Research Scholar, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram, Tamilnadu, India

V.Ravisankar

Professor, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, , Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram, Tamilnadu, India

Abstract

This paper aimed at the detailed study to weld dissimilar metals of 2mm AA1050 aluminium alloy and 1mm Low carbon steel. Process window for Tungsten Inert Gas Welding was identified. In TIG welding, joining ferrous with non ferrous by butt joint is not feasible since it has different thermal properties and melting point. So, lap joint is tried in which, Low carbon steel is placed on the top side and aluminium is placed below. Low carbon steel is plasticized, which is more or less equal to the melting point of aluminium, which will be enough to fuse the molten aluminium with the plasticized low carbon steel. This process is analogous to that of self brazing process. Special type of fixtures was developed for holding the workpiece. The results of microstructure, tensile strength, Vickers micro hardness and XRD analysis were discussed. Lap welds could be obtained with different combinations, but only within narrow operating windows. Extremely hard phases were obtained with fusion zones resulting in very brittle welds which were prone to cracking. The results indicated that TIG welding process is one of the feasible processes to weld dissimilar metals like Low Carbon Steel and aluminium alloy.

  1. Introduction

    Joining dissimilar metals is essential nowadays in manufacturing and constructing advanced machineries and equipments. Dissimilar joints can be used to create mechanically robust joints between parts composed of dissimilar metals in marine, automotives, aerospace, boiler and medical applications. Different kinds of metals feature different physical, chemical and metallurgical properties: some are stronger, some have high weldablity, some are high corrosion resistant, some are easily machinable, etc. Dissimilar weld is therefore required to compose different properties of metals in order to minimize material cost, maximize the performance and reduce the vulnerability to failure and maintenance. In recent times there has been an increase

    in the interest of the use of welding techniques to join dissimilar metals mainly ferrous with non ferrous.

    Pure Aluminium has little strength, but possesses high electrical conductivity, reflectivity and corrosion resistance. Aluminium is the most commonly used and commercially available metal due to its light weight and high strength to weight ratio. The steel / Aluminium combination nowadays also has applications in small ship/yacht-building [1]. The car industry focuses to improve fuel efficiency. One of the solutions is to reduce the weight of the car body. Replacing of steel parts by aluminium is very effective to achieve large weight reduction [2]. Further aquatic transportation vehicles prefer hulls made of steel and aluminium alloys; the under-water surface is made of steel, whereas, above the water surface, it is possible to use aluminium alloy. This structure not only lowers the centre of gravity of the vehicles, but also achieves a greater weight reduction [4]. Lighter means of transport permits saving on fuel consumption and contribute to the environmental protection due to the reduction of green house gases [8]. It has been known that the difficulty of dissimilar metal joining between steel and aluminium alloy is caused with the brittle intermetallic reaction phase formation [9]. The formation of brittle intermetallic compounds varies according to the welding conditions and has to be avoided as much as possible. Indeed, it has been shown that those intermetallic compounds can weaken the weld joint because of high micro-hardness [8].

    Tungsten Inert Gas welding is suitable welding process for joining thin sections of similar metals. It is one of the possible welding processes for joining dissimilar metal between steel/aluminum alloys by using self-brazing technique due to its possibility to produce partial penetration weld in steel sheet. It is difficult to join steel to aluminum by fusion welding. The main challenge in the fusion of Aluminium to steel is the large difference in the melting temperatures. Further, the difference in thermal expansion coefficient is large, which leads stress in the joint interface [1]. In addition to the temperature difference, the formation of

    intermetallic compounds such as FeAl3 and Fe2Al5 has a major role in welding dissimilar joints [6]. Better results can be expected when the amount of Aluminium rich intermetallic compounds are reduced to the major extent [3].

    However, few researches were done in order to investigate on TIG Welding in joining steel and aluminium alloys. Thus, in the present paper, detailed study on using TIG welding in joining of dissimilar metals like low carbon steel and aluminium alloy has been carried out.

  2. Experimental Set Up

    TABLE I:

    CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF LOW CARBON STEEL

    ————————————————————–

    ELEMENT C Mn Si P Cr Ni Ti FE

    % OF WT .06 .23 .06 .02 .045 .045 .002 99.4

    TABLE.II

    CHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF AA 1050

    ————————————

    ELEMENT Al Si FE

    % OF WT 99.5 0.25 0.25

    Fig. 1: Schematic diagram of the interface during dissimilar metals welding between low carbon steel and aluminium alloy

    Materials used: 1mm thick Low carbon steel and 2mm thick AA1050 aluminium alloy were used. Their chemical compositions and mechanical properties are shown in Table I and II, respectively. Both steel and aluminium alloy were prepared in size of 300 x 150mm. The experiment was started by immerging steel sheet in 12% HCl for 2min at 80°C in order to remove oxide layer.

    TIG Welding: Gas Tungsten Arc Welding [GTAW] or Tungsten Inert Gas [TIG] welding employs a non consumable tungsten electrode with an envelope of inert shielding gas [Argon, Helium] to protect both the electrode and the weld pool from the detrimental effects of surrounding atmospheric gasses. This experiment, TIG welding is done using Lincoln machine, Polarity: Direct Current Electrode Negative [DCEN], Welding

    current and welding speed are 130, 135, 140Amps and 3.2, 3.5, 3.8mm/sec respectively, Voltage 16V, Frequency 60Hz, The arc distance, electrode type, electrode size and electrode tip angle was 2.4mm, EWTh-2, 3mm in diameter and Vertical respectively. Pure argon gas with 20L/min was used for preventing oxidation of molten steel. A special type of fixture is prepared for proper welding. The specially designed fixture is shown in fig.2. Schematic representation of dissimilar weld is shown in the fig.3.

    Fig. 2: Specially designed fixture

    Fig.3: Schematic representation of dissimilar weld TABLE.III

    MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS

    —————————————————————–

    Metal UTS [MPa] Hardness [VHN] Low carbon steel 460 152

    AA 1050 110 63 .

    III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

    The macroscopic observations were carried out in order to obtain the depth of weld. Fig.4 shows

    the macroscopic observation of steel weld pool obtained with electrical current of 130, 135A and 3.2, 3.5mm/sec of welding speed. From the Figures, it is clear that, the partial penetration of molten zone of steel sheet can be obtained by TIG welding process. Also Fig.4 shows the depth of weld obtained with various apparent heat input for joining.

    Fig.4: Macroscopic view of welded joint at different currents

    The finding are, many welding conditions produce the partial penetration welding in 1mm thickness steel sheet. Moreover, the depth of weld is increased when heat input is increased. Thus, it can be referred that TIG welding process is possible to join dissimilar metals by self brazing process in limiting welding heat input. Some of the defects are also clearly visible. Porosity is prominently seen in 135Amps and in 140A.

    The microstructure reveals distinct weld metal, heat affected zone [HAZ] and base metal zones. In order to get more ideas regarding the microstructure, images were taken at higher magnifications also. All the specimens are prepared, etched and microstructure images are taken at different magnifications. Partial etching is done carefully. 3% Nital is used for low carbon steel and Kellers reagent is used as etchant for Aluminium. Low carbon steel is etched first and aluminium is etched secondly.

    The grain size is coarse in the base metal; it gets reduced in grain size in the HAZ and still becomes finer in the weld metal zone. The grains for 130A are viewed in 200x magnification. The base metal grains were coarser, and is equally distributed. Distinct area of Base metal and HAZ is also clear. It also reveals that the HAZ has the smaller grains when compared to Base metal. This refinement is mainly due to transfer of heat. The distance of the HAZ will be depending upon the thermal conductivity of the metal.

    The image c reveals the HAZ and Weld zone of the low carbon steel. The picture expose that the grains get refined more from the base metal zone to the weld zone. In the steel side base metals of all the specimens, microstructure shows elongated grains of ferrite and spheriodized pearlite distributed throughout the matrix and on the

    1. (b)

(c) (d)

(e) (f)

Fig. 5. [a] Base metal [b] Heat Affected Zone and Base Metal

  1. Heat Affected Zone and Weld metal [d] Weld zone [e] Fusion zone with Dark Aluminium and Bright Mild Steel [f] Intermetallics for 130A, 16V, 3.2mm/sec, 200x.

    aluminium side, microstructure shows fine black particles of Mg2Si distributed in a matrix of aluminium solid solution throughout the structure. Fine eutectic cells were also found. In the weld metal, number of dark areas where predominant which may be the intermetallics formed in aluminium region. The dark areas are also seen in the adjacent HAZ closer to the weld metal. It also shows fine grains of ferrite and spheriodized pearlite near the grain boundaries. Microstructure for low carbon steel is also viewed. Moreover same type of characteristics was seen on the microstructural behaviour of low carbon steel in the other specimens also. But the grain sizes are different. When aluminium side is etched and viewed under microstructure, its behaviour is totally different. The etchant used for aluminium is Kellers reagent. More intermetallics are found in the aluminium side when compared to steel side. There is also distinct HAZ and base metal zone. Fusion zone is very difficult to identify, it may be due to the formation of intermetallics. The bright area is composed of steel fragments and is located at the center of the weld zone. The cleavage lines tend to occur along the interface between the fragment and the aluminum matrix. Different sized

    both finer and coarser intermetallics are seen in the fusion zone. Intermetallics are mainly due to the fusion of steel into aluminium zone. Some of the particles from Steel got detached during welding and penetrate into the aluminium zone. The formation of brittle intermetallic compounds varies according to the welding conditions and has to be avoided as much as possible. In the weld zone, microstructure shows elongated grains of ferrite and spheriodized pearlite distributed throughout the structure. Indeed, it has been shown that those intermetallic compounds can cause a weakening of the welds because of high hardness [6]. Further the results expose that intermetallic reaction layer thickness increase with increasing apparent heat input for joining. From these results, if the joints produced at lower apparent heat input will produce thin intermetallic reaction layer. Improper penetrations of steel into the aluminium are visible. The intermetallic compounds presented on it are

    grouped as Fe-rich compounds [FeAl and Fe Al]

    3

    traverse speed, increase in strength of the weld joint can be achieved. The fracture path of all the specimens is through the weld itself, but mostly along the fusion line. Some of the samples show shearing of the weld into the Aluminium. The fracture took place mainly at the intermetallics due

    to the presence of brittle FeAl . Fig. 7 and fig. 8

    3

    reveal the peel of test specimen before and after the test respectively.

    Fig: 6: Schematic representation of peel of test specimen

    and Al-rich compounds [FeAl , Fe Al and FeAl ].

    2 2 5 3

    Al-rich intermetallic compounds are brittle, iron- rich intermetallic compounds show slight ductility and high strength [9].

    Major problem in the case of automatic TIG welding is, either the arc length has to be varied continuously or the cooling of the work piece has to be done or the job has to be kept in an inclined position calculating the arc length. These alterations are mainly due to the thermal conductivity of the aluminium. Preheating takes place at the initial stage of the process which leads to overheating of the aluminium in due course of welding. It even reaches the melting temperature, which may lead to improper weld. Likewise the joints found at the initial stage are not proper. It is mainly due to the insufficient heat transfer because; minimum time is required for preheating. A good joint is found at the mid region, whereas an improper joint is found at the later zone. It is mainly due to overheating.

    Each TIG welded specimen is cut to a 1 inch width, along the vertical direction of the welding pass using CNC EDM wire cut machine so as to reduce distortion. The peel of test is performed on Hornsfield tensometer testing machine. The diagrammatic representation of the peel of test specimen is shown in fig. 6.

    The results of Peel of test reveals that the joints made by 135A, 3.5mm/sec possesses high strength when compared to other joints. Further, failure load of the joints is in the range of 15 56 MPa, which are lower than that of base metal. Moreover, it was found that the failure load slightly decreased with increasing apparent heat input for joining. An increase in welding power as well as adjusting the

    Fig: 7. Peel of test specimen samples (before)

    Fig: 8: Peel of test specimen samples (after)

    The lower load resistance of joint when compared with base metal A1100-H12 aluminum alloy is caused by the grain growth during welding. High heat input during TIG welding result in thicker intermetallic reaction layer and coarser microstructure in HAZ of aluminum alloy. The coarser microstructure at HAZ of aluminum alloy is the main reason of lower of load resistance of aluminum alloy at heat affected zone [9]. In Stainless steel and Aluminium lap joint, a homogenous chemical composition is observed

    with low percentage of Aluminium in the weld metal away from the fusion zone. A 10-20% increase in welding power, at constant travel speed, resulted in a 40-65% increase in tensile shear strength [1]. When welding is executed by irradiating a laser from the aluminium side, cracking occurs and sufficient strength cannot be obtained. Brittle intermetallic compound tends to be generated. Therefore, in lap welding, the laser is basically irradiated from the steel side so that, the melting of aluminium alloys can be controlled appropriately. There has also been a report in which an investigation was made on the method of inducing only aluminium alloys to melt with the heat from the steel side by irradiating the high- pwer laser with a defocusing setting [3].

    TABLE IV

    Sl.No

    Current (Amps)

    Traverse Speed mm/sec

    Electrode Distance mm

    Strength MPa

    1

    130

    3.2

    2.3

    38.65

    2

    130

    3.2

    2.4

    35.89

    3

    130

    3.2

    2.5

    29.51

    4

    130

    3.5

    2.3

    40.35

    5

    130

    3.5

    2.4

    38.75

    6

    130

    3.5

    2.5

    35.49

    7

    130

    3.8

    2.3

    15.75

    8

    130

    3.8

    2.4

    13.42

    9

    130

    3.8

    2.5

    11.06

    10

    135

    3.2

    2.3

    19.95

    11

    135

    3.2

    2.4

    15.04

    12

    135

    3.2

    2.5

    14.10

    13

    135

    3.5

    2.3

    25.90

    14

    135

    3.5

    2.4

    24.16

    15

    135

    3.5

    2.5

    19.03

    16

    135

    3.8

    2.3

    55.55

    17

    135

    3.8

    2.4

    52.61

    18

    135

    3.8

    2.5

    47.37

    19

    140

    3.2

    2.3

    13.45

    20

    140

    3.2

    2.4

    11.94

    21

    140

    3.2

    2.5

    9.38

    22

    140

    3.5

    2.3

    38.00

    23

    140

    3.5

    2.4

    23.58

    24

    140

    3.5

    2.5

    25.76

    25

    140

    3.8

    2.3

    29.00

    26

    140

    3.8

    2.4

    27.69

    27

    140

    3.8

    2.5

    23.47

    Sl.No

    Current (Amps)

    Traverse Speed mm/sec

    Electrode Distance mm

    Strength MPa

    1

    130

    3.2

    2.3

    38.65

    2

    130

    3.2

    2.4

    35.89

    3

    130

    3.2

    2.5

    29.51

    4

    130

    3.5

    2.3

    40.35

    5

    130

    3.5

    2.4

    38.75

    6

    130

    3.5

    2.5

    35.49

    7

    130

    3.8

    2.3

    15.75

    8

    130

    3.8

    2.4

    13.42

    9

    130

    3.8

    2.5

    11.06

    10

    135

    3.2

    2.3

    19.95

    11

    135

    3.2

    2.4

    15.04

    12

    135

    3.2

    2.5

    14.10

    13

    135

    3.5

    2.3

    25.90

    14

    135

    3.5

    2.4

    24.16

    15

    135

    3.5

    2.5

    19.03

    16

    135

    3.8

    2.3

    55.55

    17

    135

    3.8

    2.4

    52.61

    18

    135

    3.8

    2.5

    47.37

    19

    140

    3.2

    2.3

    13.45

    20

    140

    3.2

    2.4

    11.94

    21

    140

    3.2

    2.5

    9.38

    22

    140

    3.5

    2.3

    38.00

    23

    140

    3.5

    2.4

    23.58

    24

    140

    3.5

    2.5

    25.76

    25

    140

    3.8

    2.3

    29.00

    26

    140

    3.8

    2.4

    27.69

    27

    140

    3.8

    2.5

    23.47

    RESULTS OF PEEL OF STRENGTH

    Case 1: 130A, 3.2mm/sec, 2.3mm; Case 2: 130A, 3.5mm/sec, 2.4mm Case 3: 130A, 3.8mm/sec, 2.5mm; Case 4:135A, 3.2mm/sec, 2.4mm; Case 5: 135A,3.5mm/sec, 2.5mm; Case 6: 135A, 3.8mm/sec, 2.3mm; Case 7:140A,3.2mm/sec, 2.5mm;Case8: 140A, 3.5mm/sec, 2.4mm; Case 9: 140A, 3.8mm/sec, 2.3mm;

    Fig. 9: Hardness Vs Distance

    Vickers Micro-hardness is tested in all the joints at a spacing distance of 0.5mm from the weld center towards the base metal. Dwell time is 20 sec; load is 2 Kg, using a diamond tip. Micro hardness is also taken on the traverse side in the weld zone. The results are displayed in fig.9. The Vickers hardness of the base materials is Al=63.5, low carbon steel =152. Maximum hardness of 290 was achieved in steel side and 75 in Aluminium side. Same type of behaviour in hardness is seen on all the other specimens also. The hardness value kept on increasing till the weld center is reached on both the Al side and low carbon steel side. This fluctuation in hardness is mainly due to recrystalization of the grains. As the weld center is reached, the temperature increases during welding, which resulted in finer grain structure. Moreover the presence of hard brittle intermetallics was the main reason for the increase in hardness. Intermetallics are hard steel particle which got detached from the parent metal during welding. Increase in hardness also reduces the tensile strength of the joint. Most of the failure is brittle in nature. The high hardness in the fusion zone may be attributed to the formation of intermetallic phases, but to some extent very fine microstructure resulted due to high cooling rates [1]. It is suggested that most intermetallic compound layer is formed mainly by brittle FeAl3 [2]. Sufficient tensile strength is not obtained and impact strength also seems low [3].

    Counts

    WM

    400

    brittle intermetallics, are the main reason for the increase in hardness.

    • Some of the defects are also clearly visible. Porosity is prominently seen in 130Amps and in 140Amps.

      200

      0

      Peak list:

      20 30 40 50 60 70

      Position [°2Theta] (Copper (Cu))

      Fig. 9: XRD result

      REFERENCE

      1. Banovic. S. W, DuPont J. N, and Marder. A. R, Dilution and micro segregation in dissimilar metal welds between super austenitic stainless steel and nickel base alloys, Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, Vol. 7 No. 6, pp. 374 384, 2002.

      2. Blewett R.V., Welding aluminium and its alloys, A review of applications and requirements, Welding & metal fabrication, pp.449-454, 1991.

      3. Borrisutthekul, R., T. Yachi, Y. Miyashita and Y. Mutoh, Suppression of intermetallic reaction layer formation by controlling heat flow in dissimilar joining of steel and aluminum alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A., pp 108-113, 2007.

      4. Bozzi. S, Etter. A. L, Baudin. T, Robineau. A, and Goussain.

        J. C, Mechanical behavior and Microstructure of Aluminium Steel sheets joined by FSSW, Hindawi publishing corporation, Texture, Stress and Microstructure, Vol 2008, Article ID 360617, 8 pages, 2008.

      5. Çalik. A, Karaka M. S, and Varol. R, Fatigue Behavior of Electron Beam Welded Dissimilar Metal Joints, Welding Research, Vol. 91, 50-52-s, 2012.

      6. DebRoy. T, and Bhadeshia. H. K. D. H, Friction stir

        welding of dissimilar alloys a perspective Science and

        Pos

        [ °2Th.]

        Height [cts]

        FWHM [°2Th.]

        d- spacing [Ã…]

        Rel. Int. [%]

        38.4892

        328.87

        0.2160

        2.3370

        100.0

        44.7630

        245.23

        0.1680

        2.0230

        74.57

        65.1281

        120.57

        0.1920

        1.4311

        36.66

        Pos

        [ °2Th.]

        Height [cts]

        FWHM [°2Th.]

        d- spacing [Ã…]

        Rel. Int. [%]

        38.4892

        328.87

        0.2160

        2.3370

        100.0

        44.7630

        245.23

        0.1680

        2.0230

        74.57

        65.1281

        120.57

        0.1920

        1.4311

        36.66

        The XRD result of the weld joint is shown in the fig 9. It is observed that a number of crystalline phases were formed. The results of XRD also revealed the presence of Fe-rich compounds [FeAl

        and Fe Al] and Al-rich compounds [FeAl , Fe Al

        Technology of Welding and Joining, Vol. 15, No4, pp. 266- 270, 2010.

      7. Edmilson Otoni Correa, Weldability of Iron Based Powder Metal Alloys Using Pulsed GTAW Process, Arc welding, www.intechopen.com, pp 109-126, 2011.

      8. Esther T, Stephen A, Friction Stir Welding of Dissimilar

        3

        and FeAl ] in the matrix.

        3

        2 2 5

        Materials Statistical Analysis of the Weld Data,

        Proceeding of IMECS 2012, Vol. II, 2012.

        IV CONCLUSION

        • From the above results, TIG welding of 2mm low carbon steel with 1mm AA1050 is feasible. The process can be explained as a self brazing process, in which the low carbon steel is heated to the melting point of the Aluminium, which is sufficient for fusion of Aluminium with low carbon steel.

        • Experiment with 135A, 16V, Speed 3.5mm/sec yielded better strength and hardness when compared to other welding conditions.

        • By optimizing the speed, we can increase the depth of penetration as well as the strength of the joint.

        • Intermetallics are found between the joint. It is suggested that intermetallic compound layer

    formed are mainly brittle FeAl, Fe Al, FeAl ,

    1. Faidy. C, Martin. G, Chapuliot. S, Kayser. Y, Safa. N,

      Cipierre. MF, Gilles. P, Keinanen. H, Laukkanen. A, Sherry. A, Lidbury. D, Wintle. J., Taylor. N, Youtsos. A, Lenkey. G, Assessment of aged piping dissimilar metal weld integrity (ADIMEW), Proceedings of FISA 2003 Conference, Luxembourg, 2003.

    2. George A. Young, John G. Banker, Explosion Welded, Bi- Metallic Solutions to Dissimilar Metal Joining, Proceedings of the 13th Offshore Symposium, Texas, 2004.

    3. Göbel. G, Kaspar. J, Herrmannsdörfer. T, Brenner. B, Beyer. E, Insights into intermetallic phases on pulse welded dissimilar metal joints, 4th International Conference on High Speed Forming, pp. 127-136, 2010.

    4. H.J. Park, D.C. Kim, M.J. Kang, S. Rhee; Optimisation of the wire feed rate during pulse MIG welding of Al sheets. Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering Volume 27, by International OCSCO world.

    5. Hitoshi Ozaki, Muneharu Kutsuna, Shigeyuki Nakagawa

      and Kenji Miyamoto, Laser Roll Welding of Dissimilar

      Fe Al

      2 5

      and FeAl .

      3

      3 2 Metal Joint of Zinc Coated Steel and Aluminium Alloy, II

      W Doc. IV pp. 906 909, 2001.

    6. Hui-Chi Chen & Andrew J. Pinkerton & Lin Li, Fibre laser

      Increase in hardness value is mainly due to recrystalization of the grain structure. As it reaches the weld center, the temperature increases during welding, which results in finer grain structure, moreover the presence of hard

      welding of dissimilar alloys of Ti-6Al-4V and Inconel 718 for aerospace applications, Int J Adv Manuf Technol, pp. 2791-2793, 2010.

    7. Indira Rani M., Marpu.R.N., A.C.S.Kumar, A study of

      process parameters of friction stir welded aa 6061

      aluminum alloy in o and t6 conditions, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 61-66, 2011.

    8. Jyoti Prakash, S.P.Tewari, Bipin Kumar Srivastava, Shielding Gas for Welding of Aluminium Alloys by TIG/MIG Welding-A Review Vol.1, Issue.2, pp. 690-699, 2003.

    9. K. Kishore, P. V. Gopal Krishna, K. Veladri and Syed Qasim Ali; Analysis of defects in gas shielded arc welding of AISI1040 steel using Taguchi method. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Vol 5, No.1.

    10. K.Y. Benyounis, A.G. Olabi; Optimization of different welding processes using statistical and numerical approaches A reference guide. Advances in Engineering Software 39 (2008) 483496

    11. Kankanala, Anusha; James, Jon; Bouchard, John; Northover, Shirley and Yescas, Miguel, Measurement of residual stresses in a dissimilar metal welded pipe. In MECA SENS VI, pp. 7 -9, 2011.

    12. Katayama. S, Laser welding of Aluminium alloys and dissimilar metals, Welding International, Vol. 18 *8+. pp. 618 625, 2004.

    13. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, Wiley, New York, 198 1, Vo1.13,624.

    14. Krishnaprasad. K, Raghu V. Prakash,, Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior in Dissimilar Metal Weldment of Stainless Steel and Carbon Steel World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology 32, pp. 873-879, 2009.

    15. Lee, K.J. and S. Kumai, Characterization of intermetallic compound layer formed at the weld interface of the defocused laser welded low carbon steel/6111 aluminum alloy lap joint. Mater. Trans., pp. 1178-1185, 2006.

    16. Lee, K.J., S. Kumai and T. Arai, Interfacial microstructure and strength of steel to aluminum alloy lap joints welded by a defocused laser beam. Mater. Trans., pp. 1847- 1856, 2005.

    17. Li, CT. and Albe, W.R., Development of an improved XRD Sample holder, powder Diffraction 8 (2), June 1993, 118- 121.

    18. Metzger G.E Aug Gas tungsten Arc welding of a powder metallurgy aluminum alloy Welding journal, pp.297-302, 1992.

    19. Mir Sadat Ali, Ch.Srinivasa Rao, Study of mechanical properties in a weld bead of dissimilar metals, International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology (IJEST), Vol. 3 No 5, pp. 4411-4416, 2011.

    20. Miyashita, Y., I. Nakagawa, J.Q. Xu, Y. Mutoh, M. Akahori and H. Okumura, Laser welding of dissimilar metals joint aided by unsteady thermal convection boundary element method analysis. Q. J. Jap. Weld. Soc., pp. 16-24, 2005.

    21. Mueller. S, Volpone. L. M, Friction Stir Welding of Steel Aluminium sandwich panels, Welding International, pp. 699-705, 2007.

    22. Muhamad Tehyo, Prapas Muangjunburee and Somchai Chuchom, Friction stir welding of dissimilar joint between semi-solid metal 356 and AA 6061-T651 by computerized numerical control machine, Songklanakarin J. Sci. Technol., pp 441-448, 2011.

    23. N.B. Mostafa, M.N. Khajavi; ; Optimisation of welding parameters for weld penetration in FCAW Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering Vol. 16 ISSUE 1-2 May-June 2006

    24. Nelson. T. W, Lippold. J. C. Mills. M. J, Nature and Evolution of the Fusion Boundary in Ferritic-Austenitic Dissimilar Weld Metals, Part 1 Nucleation and Growth, Welding Research Supplement, pp. 329-337-s, 1999,

    25. P K Palani, Dr N Murugan, Modeling of Heat Input in

      Stainless Steel Cladding using Taguchis Design of Experiments IE(I) Journal-MC, Vol. 87, January 2.

    26. P.Sathiya, Swati, V.Manaswini, Anubha Singh Bhadauria and Snigdha Lakra; Optimizing The Gas Metal Arc Welding Parameter Of Super Austenitic Stainless Steel By Grey Based Taguchis Method

    27. Rathod, M.J. and M. Kutsuna, Joining of aluminum alloy 5052 and low-carbon steel by laser roll welding. Weld. J., pp. 16-26S, 2004.

    28. Rattana Borrisutthekul, Pusit Mitsomwang, Sirirat Rattanachan Yoshiharu Mutoh, Feasibility of Using TIG Welding in Dissimilar Metals between Steel/Aluminum Alloy, Energy Research Journal 1, pp. 82-86, 2010.

    29. Saperstein Z.P and Eyring C.L. Fracture strength microstructure of welds in 2014aluminum, Welding journal. pp. 90-94, 1968.

    30. Saurav Datta & Asish Bandyopadhyay & Pradip Kumar; Application of Taguchi philosophy for parametric optimization of bead geometry and HAZ width in submerged arc welding using a mixture of fresh flux and fused flux

    31. Serdar Karaoglu and Abdullah Seçgin; Sensitivity analysis of submerged arc welding process parameters journal of materials processing technology, volume 202 (2008) 500 507.

    32. Shubhavardhan RN, Surendran S, Friction Welding to Join Dissimilar Metals International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, Vol 2, Issue 7, pp. 200-211, 2012.

    33. Sourav Datta, Ajay Biswas, Gautam Majumdar; Sensitivity analysis for relative importance of different weld quality indicator influencing optimal process condition of Submerged Arc Welding using Gray based Taguchi Method The International Journal for Manufacturing science & production, Vol. 10 No. 2 2009

    34. Stark, F.O., Falender, J.R., Wright, A.D., Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry, Pergamon Press, Oxford & New York, 1982,305-360.

    35. Sun Yufeng, Fujii Hidetoshi, Takada Yutaka, Tsuji Nobuhiro, Nakata Kazuhiro, Nogi Kiyoshi, Microstructure and Hardness distribution of Friction Stir Welded 1050 Al and IF Steel with different original grain sizes, Transactions of JWRI, Vol.38, No.2, 2009.

    36. Sunwoo A.J., Morris J.W, Microstructure and properties of aluminum alloy2090 weldments", Annual American Welding Society Meeting, pp. 262-268, 1989.

    37. Thaiping Chen, Process parameters study on FSW Joint of dissimilar metals for Aluminium Steel, Journal of Material Science, pp. 2573 2580, 2009.

    38. Theron. M, VanRooyen. C, Ivanchev. L.H, CW ND: YAG Laser welding of dissimilar sheet metals, Paper# 803.

    39. Tucker M.S. and Philips, The influence of cooling rates on microstructure and strength of2014 Al-alloy weld, Welding Journal pp.82-86. Feb 1968.

    40. Ugur r Esme; Application of Taguchi method for the optimization of resistance spot welding process. The Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, Volume 34, Number 2B

Leave a Reply