Development of Landfill Liner Material Using Recycled Concrete Aggregate

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV13IS030193

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Development of Landfill Liner Material Using Recycled Concrete Aggregate

Ms. Hridya P Assistant Professor

Department Of Civil Engineering Vimal Jyothi Engineering College

Chemperi, Kannur (District), Kerala, India

Athulraj KP, Christy Jose, Felix Sabi, Gopika Gangadharan, UG student, Vimal Jyothi Engineering College Chemperi (Autonomous) Kannur (District), Kerala, India

AbstractLandfills are crucial components of waste management systems, necessitating effective liner materials to mitigate environmental contamination risks. This project focuses on the development of an innovative landfill liner material utilizing recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) as a sustainable alternative to conventional clay-based liners. By replacing varying proportions of clay with RCA, the project aims to investigate the feasibility, mechanical properties, and environmental performance of the resulting composite material through comprehensive testing.

This research aims to contribute to sustainable waste management practices by repurposing construction waste materials like RCA in landfill liner construction. The findings will provide insights into the feasibility and performance of RCA-clay composite liners, offering a cost-effective and environmentally friendly alternative to traditional clay liners. Additionally, the project underscores the importance of recycling and repurposing construction waste to reduce environmental impact and promote circular economy principles in the construction industry

KeywordsRecycled concrete Aggregate, Landfill, Clay soil

Abbreviations: RCA-Recycled Concrete Aggregate, UCS- Unconfined compressive strength, EPA -Environmental Protection Agencies, MDD- Maximum dry density, OMC- Optimum moisture content

  1. INTRODUCTION

    The development of landfill liner materials using recycled concrete presents a sustainable solution to waste management challenges by repurposing construction waste and reducing the burden on landfills. By leveraging recycled concrete, this initiative conserves resources, minimizes environmental pollution, and promotes the principles of the circular economy. Through innovative research and collaboration, this project aims to create cost-effective and efficient landfill liners that protect the environment while aligning with global sustainability objectives…

  2. OBJECTIVES

    The main objective of this project is to establish the basis for the development and implementation of waste concrete aggregate recycling with the application of clay soil to make effective landfill liner material and to reduce the requirement of clay in landfill liner. Thus, make it more cost effective compared to purchasing traditional liner materials for landfill liner construction. And contribute to the long term sustain- ability of landfills by enhancing their structural and environmental performance.

  3. SCOPE OF THE STUDY

    The study aims to develop landfill liner material utilizing recycled concrete aggregate (RCA), focusing on its potential environmental and engineering benefits. Beginning with a comprehensive review of existing literature, the research will assess the suitability of RCA for landfill liner applications, considering its physical, mechanical, and chemical properties. Laboratory experiments will be conducted to characterize RCA and formulate different blends for the liners, with an emphasis on optimizing performance and durability. Subsequent testing will evaluate key parameters such as permeability, compaction properties, and resistance to degradation, comparing RCA-based liners to conventional alternatives. Environmental impact assessments and cost analyses will further elucidate the feasibility and sustainability of implementing RCA-based liners. Ultimately, the study aims to provide valuable insights for advancing sustainable waste management practices by utilizing recycled materials effectively while meeting engineering requirements and regulatory standards.

    A. Methodology

    The first phase of the project is planning. It includes identifying the objectives, selection of the materials and availability of the materials. Secondly, the site visit helps in collecting the data and understanding the fixation of landfill liners. Tests to be conducted for this purpose are then determined, ensuring they meet regulatory requirements.

    1. Planning

      • Identify the project scope, objectives, and the type of landfill liner required.

      • Assess the availability of clay and recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) materials

      • Conduct a feasibility study to ensure that the project is economically & environmentally viable. .

    2. Material Selection

      • Clay soil has specific properties that make it well-suited for use as a landfill liner material. These properties include low permeability, high plasticity, and swelling potential

      • RCA is the primary material for your project. It's essential to ensure that the recycled concrete aggregate is of high quality and free from contaminants. The source and processing of the recycled concrete are critical to its performance. Consider factors such as particle size, cleanliness, and gradation.

    3. Preparation of Sample

    In this project, the clay soil is replaced with different amounts of recycled concrete aggregate.

    Table 1: Preparation of samples

  4. CONDUCTION OF TESTS

    1. Atterberg Limit

      Determine the liquid limit, plastic limit and plasticity index of the liner.

    2. Standard Proctor Test

      Evaluates the compaction characteristics of liner materials to ensure proper compaction during installation.

    3. pH Test

      Determines the pH of the liner material to assess its chemical compatibility with the waste being disposed of.

    4. Swelling Test

      Assesses the potential for liner materials, like clay, to swell when exposed to water.

    5. Unconfined Compression Test

      Determine the strength of clay – RCA mixture. Static compaction was used to compact the samples at OMC

      and MDD states in accordance with relevant standards and they were stressed at 30mm/hr strain rate.

    6. Permeability Test

    Determines the liner' s ability to resist the flow of liquid.

  5. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

    1. Atterberg Limit

      Results for plastic limit, liquid limit and plasticity index is shown in table

      Table 2: Results of Atterberg Limit

      The results (table 2) show that the plastic limit is below 30% for every sample which is the standard range. Plastic limit increases with the increase of recycled concrete aggregate in the sample. When the amount of recycled concrete aggregate is more than 70%, material does not show plastic behavior.

      Figure 1 : Results of Atterberg Limits

      The required liquid limit according to standards is greater than 30%. Liquid limits of samples 1 (10% RCA), 2 (20% RCA) and 3 (30% RCA) are within required range (fig ). Samples having RCA greater than 30% have liquid limits less than 30%. Sample 1 shows maximum liquid limit. With RCA greater than 70% shows extreme liquid behavior even when a mall amount of water is added.

    2. Standard Proctor Test

      Results for maximum dry density & optimum moisture content of each sample are given in the table.

      Table 3: Results of Standard Proctor Test

    3. Swell Index

      Results for swelling test of each sample is shown in table Table 4: Results of Swell Index

      Figure 3: Results of Swell index

      In this experiment, only samples with 10% RCA, 20% RCA and 30% RCA undergoes swelling. Only the 1st sample is out of range. Samples having RCA greater than 30% do not undergo swelling.

    4. pH Test

      Results of pH for different samples are shown in figure below.

      Figure 2: Results of Standard Proctor Test

      All samples have required maximum dry density (>1.5g/cc). Samples with 60% and 70% RCA possess the highest maximum dry density of 1.85 g/cc (fig 2). Maximum dry density values fluctuate while increasing the amount of RCA. Sample 1 with 10% RCA shows the lowest maximum dry density value. Considering the optimum moisture content, samples 2, 5 and 6 (fig 2) do not have the required OMC. All other samples are within the range (>15%). Sample with 40% RCA has the highest optimum moisture content.

      Table 5: Results of pH

      Figure 4: Results of pH test

      The pH range should be compatible with the waste chemistry, typically within the range of 6 to 8 for general landfill applications. Here the obtained values are out of the range. However, it can vary based on specific waste characteristics.

    5. Unconfined Compression Test

      Table 6: Results of UCC

      Results for the unconfined Compression Test of each sample is shown in table 6.

      Figure 5: Results of UCC

      Figure 6: Results of Permeability test

      Range of coefficient of permeability of landfill liner is 1×10- 7 to 1x 10-9 cm/s. Here the values are out of the range. But permeability of 40% RCA is closer to standard range and has low permeability.

  6. CONCLUSION

The graph of test results shows a similar trend in almost 3 to 4 experiments that the samples 3, 4 and 5 have favorable properties and other samples are outliers. It might be because of adding the smaller particle sized RCA gives better compaction properties and less permeability to the samples 3, 4 and 5 and adding further RCA could reduce the amount of clay and therefore the cohesion and bonding between clay soil is minimized so the properties may become out of the range. The results of various tests that we have done conclude that only sample 3 with 30% RCA and sample 4 with 40% RCA are showing properties closer to the required range. Out of these 2 samples we concluded that sample 4 is more superior because it has less permeability than that of sample 3. Even though sample 3 has more dry density than sample 4, still sample 4 is superior in the aspects of pH value and swelling. Sample 4 has zero swell index and sample 3 has swell index 5, this clearly shows sample 4 (40% RCA) is better than the other samples.

The unconfined compressive strength of the material should be greater than 1.83kg/cm². In this experiment, only the sample with 40% RCA comes under the range.

  1. Permeability test

Table 7: results of Permeability test

REFERENCES

  1. Devapriya et al:(2023), Evaluation of red soil – bentonite mixtures for compacted clay liners, Elsevier, Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering

  2. Devika et al (2022) Suitability of demolition waste as a landfill liner material – an experimental approach, Sustainability, Agriculture,

    Food and Environmental Research

  3. Nath et al (2023), Geotechnical properties & applicability of bentonite – modified local soil as landfill and environmental sustainability liners, Elsevier, Environmental and Sustain – ability Indicators

  4. Rahardjo et al (2018), Effect of concrete waste particles on infiltration characteristics of soil, Environmental Earth Science

  5. Vathani et al (2023), A novel approach to utilize recycled concrete aggregates as landfill liner, Elsevier, Waste Management Bulletin

  6. Widomski et al (2018), Clays of Different Plasticity as Materials for Landfill Liners in Rural Systems of Sustainable Waste Management, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

  7. ASTM D2166/D2166M- 13 (2006), Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil.

  8. ASTM D4972 (2001), Standard test method for pH of soil.

  9. ASTM D698-12 (2012), Standard test method for standard proctor compaction test.

  10. ASTM D5084-16a (2016), Standard test method for permeability test for clay soil.

  11. ASTM D4546 -08 (1996), Standard test method for measuring swell index.