Durability study on Basalt Fibre Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) Composites Wrapped Specimens for Retrofitting of RCC piles

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV3IS110090

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Durability study on Basalt Fibre Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) Composites Wrapped Specimens for Retrofitting of RCC piles

  1. Anandakumar , Asst. Prof., S.Veerasamy Chettiar College of Engg. & Tech.,

    Puliangudi, Tamilnadu, India

    Dr. C. Selvamony, Professor, Sun College of Engg. & Tech., Erachakulam, Tamilnadu, India

    1. Seeni , Asst. Prof.,

  2. Veerasamy Chettiar College of Engg. & Tech., Puliangudi, Tamilnadu, India

Dr. M. S. Ravikumar, Professor & HOD, Noorul Islam University,

Kumaracoil, Tamilnadu, India

AbstractThis paper shows the test result on durability of Basalt Fibre Reinforced Polymer (BFRP) composite wrapped specimens evaluated by using acid resistance test and temperature resistance test. The main aim of this study is to depict the durability of RCC end bearing piles retrofitted with BFRP. The specimens were wrapped with basalt unidirectional fabric warp along with the circumference or hoop tension direction. 36 nos. of cube specimens were cast with and without BFRP wrapping to observe the fluctuation in compressive strength during acid and fire resistance tests. The acid resistance tests were carried out on specimens by using diluted hydrochloric acid solution. The acid immersed specimens were tested for determination of compressive strength after curing for 7 days, 30 days and 70 days. Similarly, the fire resistance tests were carried out by using hot air oven at 200C for 1, 2 and 3 hours intervals. The comparison of the results between control specimens and BFRP wrapped specimens were made to evaluate the difference in compressive strength

Keywords Pile, Acid resistance, Fire resistance, Compressive strength, Basalt Fibre

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Generally, concrete is a durable material widely used in construction. Its durability is governed by concrete mix design, environmental conditions, age of building, chemical attack, atmospheric weather, carbonation, sub soil water table, sub soil condition, permeability, quality of materials & works, shape and size of members, cover thickness, cement contents, water cement ratio, chloride content, alkali-silica reaction, finishing and initial curing of water properties, etc. The strength of concrete has a direct relation with its durability. Hence, the concrete should possess the ability to resist weathering action, chemical attacks, abrasion, deterioration, etc. Durable concrete retains its the original form, quality and serviceability even when exposed to aggressive environments. Over recent years, concrete durability researches are being conducted by technologists for saving the structures from cited cause and for maintaining the

    sustainability of the globe. Durability can be extended by using suitable methods of maintenance, repairing, rehabilitations and retrofitting or strengthening. Among the various methods of retrofitting, the FRP wrapping is one of the best methods. FRP supports in increasing the durability of concrete by reducing the permeability, resisting high temperature, resisting chemical attack, withstanding the fatigue action, sealing of micro pores, providing additional strength to the elements, etc. In this experiment, the basalt unidirectional fabric was used along the hoop direction that is along the perimeter. Durability experimental tests were tested in concrete cube specimens in addition to retrofitting of RCC piles by using basalt fibre. Various experiments are used for measuring the durability performance previously against the RCC pile retrofitting works. Even now, the experiment tests were done for axial load, lateral load, impact load and skin friction performance after retrofitting with BFRP composites. Gao et. al. found the performance of carbon and glass fibres reinforced polymer confined cylinders in freeze-thaw cycles and compared both with conventional cylinder specimens. Two different types of adhesives were used for confinement of cylinders. After freeze-thaw cycles, all the specimens showed decrement in strength, stiffness and ductility. CFRP confined cylinders showed more resistance to the freeze-thaw cycles than GFRP confined cylinders. Adhesive 1 used specimen showed more ductility than adhesive 2, but adhesive 2 is more susceptible to freeze-thaw cycles than adhesive 1 [1]. Erdil et. al. carried out durability test in low strength concrete, by confining the same with carbon fibres under the temperature cycles of 200C. and temperature change between -10°C to 50°C. Single layer wrapped specimens possess 3 times more strength and five times more resistance to strain while comparing with control specimens. Confined and unconfined concrete specimens exhibit increased strength, but strain decreased when subjected to temperature cycles and sustained loads [2]. Shimomura and Maruyam found that chloride ingresses both in carbon and aramid fibre retrofitted concrete specimens. The CFRP specimens resist the chloride more than aramid and control

    specimens [3]. Kumuth and Vijai determined corrosion and chloride attack level in the GFRP wrapped concrete cylinder specimens and compared with conventional specimens. They found that the GFRP wrapped specimens resists corrosion and chloride attack effectively [4]. Shankarkumar et. al. investigated the effect of GFRP on M25 and M50 concrete mix in single, double and triple layers at 200C temperature. After that, M25 grade of concrete compressive strength showed decrement at 200C as 21%, 15%, 8%, 6% for 0, 1, 2,

    3 layers of GFRP wrapped concrete respectively when compared with control elements. Similarly, M50 grade concrete specimens also showed decrement at a rate of 27%, 13%, 11%, 8% for 0, 1, 2, 3 layers respectively [5]. Ataders et.al. found out the FRP wrapped specimens durability in magnesium chloride and conducted flexural strength and pull-off tests in different environmental exposures for a period of 6 months and one year in the direct field [6]. Haider Al-Jelawy conducted durability test of CFRP wrapped beams by exposing to outdoor environment, sea water solution, leachate solution, UV radiation and dry heat the environment. In all the tests, the CFRP wrapped specimens are performed well while comparing with control specimens [7]. Murugan et. al. determined the durability in cubes and cylinder by exposing to natural outdoor weather and water immersion condition with Glass and Carbon fibers Uni and Bi direction. Carbon unidirectional fibre confined cube and cylinder specimens were taken more compressive strength when compared with control specimens, bi-direction confined specimens and glass fibre confined specimens. This study measured the durability of BFRP wrapped cube specimens by using dry temperature test and Hcl. acid solution test and compared with control specimens [8].

  2. METHOD OF TESTING

    1. Acid Resistance test.

      The ingredients and preliminary tests were conducted and the single and double layer of BFRP wrapped specimens performances were found out. Based on that, author a paper was published in international journal [9]. For this acid resistance test, cube specimens of 24 nos. were cast using M30 grade concrete. After 28 days of water curing the specimens were dried in the atmosphere for 36 hours weighed (initial weight) and then kept immersed in 2% HCl diluted solution as per the Table 1. Hcl. diluted acid solution properties were shown in Table 2.

      Description of specimen

      Specimens immersed in Hcl. acid solution – Duration

      0

      day

      7

      days

      30

      day

      70

      days

      Control or conventional specimens

      in nos.

      3

      3

      3

      3

      BFRP double wrapped specimens in nos.

      3

      3

      3

      3

      TABLE I. DETAILS OF EXPERIMENTAL PROGRAM

      TABLE II. ACID PROPERTIES

      Properties of Diluted Hydrochloric Acid (Acid strength 2%)

      Value

      PH Value

      1.54

      TDS

      54.5 ppm

      After the corresponding period of acid immersion, specimens were taken out of acid solution and weighed (Present weight). It is then tested for compressive load as per the IS code 516-1959. The test results were observed and compared with control & doubly BFRP wrapped specimens with respect to weight loss and strength loss.

      Fig. 1. Cubes 7 days immersed in acid solution

      Fig. 2. Cubes 30 days immersed in acid solution

      Fig. 3. Cubes 70 days immersed in acid solution

      Fig. 4. Cubes immersed in acid solution 7 days, 30 days and 70 days.

      TABLE III. ACID RESISTANCES OF CONCRETE CUBES

      Description

      After 7 days

      After 30 days

      After 70 days

      Control

      Cube

      1

      2

      3

      1

      2

      3

      1

      2

      3

      Initial weight in gram

      8460

      8439

      8594

      8915

      8663

      8606

      8563

      8432

      8323

      Present weight in gram

      8451

      8427

      8583

      8893

      8638

      8583

      8525

      8390

      8279

      Weight loss in gram

      9

      12

      11

      22

      25

      23

      38

      42

      44

      Compr.

      Strength in kN.

      800

      798

      799

      791

      796

      793

      788

      784

      786

      BFRP

      doubly wrapped

      Initial weight in gram

      8438

      8622

      8599

      8701

      8713

      8609

      8623

      8595

      8655

      Present weight in gram

      8434

      8616

      8596

      8694

      8703

      8601

      8609

      8583

      8642

      Weight loss in gram

      4

      6

      3

      7

      10

      8

      14

      12

      13

      Compr.

      Strength in kN.

      1209

      1205

      1207

      1204

      1202

      1203

      1201

      1200

      1196

      Fig. 5. Average Compressive stress of acid immersed concrete cube

      Fig. 6. Average weight loss of acid immersed concrete cubes

    2. Fire Resistance test.

    Fig. 7. Mean compressive strength loss after acid curing

    Similarly, the specimens were weighed and kept in the hot air oven at 200C for duration of 1, 2 and 3 hours. In this experiment, temperature is kept at constant 200°C whereas

    the time varies in 1 hour interval upto three hours. The detailed data are given in below the Tables 4 to 6.

    TABLE IV. FIRE RESISTANCE TEST AT 200C 1 HR.

    Specimen type

    Initial weight in kg

    After heating weight in kg

    Ultimate load carrying capacity in kN

    Compressive strength in N/mm2

    Average compressive stress

    Control cubes

    8.701

    8.698

    806

    35.82

    35.80

    8.639

    8.634

    805

    35.77

    8.538

    8.529

    806

    35.82

    BFRP double wrapped cubes

    8.775

    8.771

    1211

    53.82

    53.82

    8.835

    8.83

    1210

    53.77

    8.810

    8.806

    1211

    53.82

    TABLE V. FIRE RESISTANCE TEST AT 200C 2 HRS.

    Specimen type

    Initial weight in kg

    After heating weight in kg

    Ultimate load carrying capacity in kN

    Compressive strength in N/mm2

    Average compressive stress

    Control cubes

    8.473

    8.449

    795

    35.33

    35.31

    8.516

    8.496

    796

    35.37

    8.561

    8.543

    793

    35.24

    BFRP double wrapped cubes

    8.867

    8.847

    1205

    53.55

    53.46

    8.623

    8.609

    1203

    53.46

    8.465

    8.446

    1201

    53.37

    TABLE VI. FIRE RESISTANCE TEST AT 200C 3 HRS.

    Specimen type

    Initial weight in kg

    After heating weight in kg

    Ultimate load carrying capacity in kN

    Compressive strength in N/mm2

    Average compressive stress

    Control cubes

    8.415

    8.401

    783

    34.8

    34.84

    8.354

    8.339

    786

    34.93

    8.430

    8.418

    783

    34.80

    BFRP double wrapped cubes

    8.440

    8.428

    1190

    52.88

    52.97

    8.565

    8.552

    1192

    52.97

    8.580

    8.568

    1194

    53.06

    Fig. 8. Concrete cubes weight loss due to temperature

    Fig. 9. Concrete cube compressive stress after dry temperature

    Fig. 10. Temperatures 200 C 1 Hr. Fig. 11. Compressive strength test on cube

  3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    From those experiments, the following inferences were made.

    The BFRP double wrapped concrete specimens possess higher acid resistance than that of the control concrete specimens.

    The decrement in compressive strength of control specimens after acid immersion for 0, 7 days, 30 days and 70

    days are 35.7 N/mm2, 35.51 N/mm2, 35.24 N/mm2 and 34.92 N/mm2 respectively shown in Fig. 5.

    The decrement in compressive strength of BFRP double wrapped specimens after acid immersion for 0, 7 days, 30 days and 70 days are 53.77 N/mm2, 53.64 N/mm2, 53.60 N/mm2 and 53.33 N/mm2 respectively shown in Fig. 5.

    The BFRP double wrapped concrete specimens are having igher dry temperature resistance more than that of the control concrete specimens.

    The decrement in compressive strength of control specimens after subjecting to dry temperature of 200oC for 0 hour, 1 hour, 2 hours and 3 hours are 35.7 N/mm2, 35.8 N/mm2, 35.32 N/mm2 and 34.83 N/mm2 respectively shown in Fig. 9.

    The decrement in compressive strength of BFRP double wrapped specimens after subjecting to dry temperature of 200o C for 0 hour, 1 hour, 2 hours and 3 hours are 53.77

    N/mm2, 53.80 N/mm2, 53.46 N/mm2 and 52.95 N/mm2 respectively shown in Fig. 9.

  4. CONCLUSION

From the research results it is concluded that BFRP double wrapped cube specimens withstands more load carrying capacity after acid immersion and thermal effects than the conventional elements. Purpose of the study was proved in this experimental. BFRP wrapping endures durability and increase the life of the elements. Thus, it can be concluded that BFRP wrapping can be used for retrofitting of RCC piles prevails.

REFERENCE

  1. D. Y. Gao, C. C. Li and G. T. Zhao, Experimental investigation on durability of FRP strips confined concrete cylinders under freeze-thaw cycles. Proce. Asia-pacific conference on FRP in structures (APFIS 2007). PP. 625-630, 2007.

  2. B. Erdil, U. Akyuz and I. O. Yaman, Behaviour of CFRP reinforced low-strength concretes subjected to temperature changes and sustained loads. The 14th world conference on earth quake engineering, October 12-17, Beijing, China. 2008.

  3. T.Shimomura and K.Maruyama, Durability of RC structures with externally bonded FRP sheets. Online journal.

  4. R.Kumutha and K.Vijai Corrosion performance of steel reinforcement in GFRP strengthened concrete cylinders. Online journal NBMCW, 2010.

  5. V. Shankarkumar , K. Arun, P. Dhivya, M. Mahesh kumar and

    R. Surresh Kumar, Strength and durability characteristics of fibre reinforced concrete. J. International journal of science and research, Vol. 2, Issue 7, PP. 395-398, 2013.

  6. Rebecca A.Atadero, Douglas G. Allen and Oscar R. Meta, Long-term monitoring of mechanical properties of FRP repair materials. Colorado department of transportation DTA applied research and innovation branch, Technical report. 2013.

  7. Haider Al-Jelawy, Experimental and numerical investigation on bond durability of CFRP strengthened concrete member subjected to environmental exposure. [M.Sc. (Engg.) Thesis], University of centeral Florida, Orlando, Florida.

  8. M. Murugan, C. Natarajan and K. Muthukumaran, Performance of FRP strengthen RC piles subjected to static and cyclic lateral loads. [Ph.D. Thesis], Department of Civil engineering National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli, Tamilnadu, India.

  9. R. Anandakumar, C. Selvamony and S. U. Kannan, Retrofitting of Concrete Specimens and Reinforced concrete Piles using Basalt Fibers International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, Volume 2 Issue 8 – August 2013- PP.01-05, 2013.s

Leave a Reply