Effect of Graphite and AL2O3 Reinforcement on Al6061 based Metal Matrix Composite

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV6IS050093

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Effect of Graphite and AL2O3 Reinforcement on Al6061 based Metal Matrix Composite

Jeevan Gowda G

Research Scholar, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vivekananda Institute of Technology,

Bangalore, Karnataka, India.

Abstract – Aluminium based composite are getting a vast scope nowadays because of its properties and availability. In the present work, Graphite and AL2O3 reinforced composite are prepared using stir casting technique for varying wt.% (Graphite 3% and AL2O3 3%, 6% & 9%). Micro structural study has been carried out on prepared composites, which reveals a good distribution of particles in to the matrix. Hardness and tensile properties were also determined; with the addition of reinforcement the properties are improved compared to the parent metal alone. Based on the evaluation 6% AL2O3 and 3% Graphite gives a better result as compared to other composition.

Keywords: Graphite, AL2O3, Composite , Aluminium, Reinforcement, stir casting;

  1. INTRODUCTION

    Composite, as the name itself indicates it is a combination of two or more material, which are non reactive and of different phase, that dont makes a homogeneous mixture that is where it stands different than alloying. The research on composites are not from few days it is from few decades, but still the process parameters are not optimised and a huge numbers of reinforcement are available which still keeps this field in higher altitude. And composites provide a better alternative to conventional material as it constitutes different material, it has its own contribution over the properties. There are so many methods to prepare metal matrix composite like powder metallurgy, stir casting, extrusion etc. Among which stir casting will be easier and economical way to produce composites.

    Cu coating on particles like SiC contributes better bonding between the reinforcements and matrix [Mohan Vanarotti et al., (2014)]. Using halide salts wettability can be increased and cover flux results in decreased contact angle and surface tension forces [G.L Rajesh et al., (2014)]. Inert gasses can also be used to prevent the formation of oxides [J. Jebeen Moses et al., (2014)]. Addition of some materials like fly ash to aluminium matrix improves the hardness, wear resistance, stiffness etc., when the reinforcement is more than 15% the tensile strength is reportedly decreasing [ Rohatgi et al., (1997)]. The grain also has its own impact on material properties, lower grain size results in higher mechanical properties [K.R. Ravi et al., (2008)]

  2. COMPOSITE PREPARATION

    In our work, stir casting technique is used to prepare the composites. The procedure used is the required amount of aluminium is weighed and placed in crucible, temperature was preset to 7100c, and once the temperature is attained, same temperature is maintained for 10minutes to confirm complete molten state of the metal, hexacholoroethane tablets are used for degassing. The corresponding wt.% of reinforcement is weighed and preheated to 4000c to remove moisture. And the mould is also preheated to minimise casting defects. Now after achieving complete liquid state the melt is stirred at 300-

    400 RPM to create vortex and preheated reinforcement along with magnesium and coverall is introduced while stirring, coverall helps in preventing oxidation and magnesium to improve wettability. After stirring for 10 minutes the slag is removed and the melt is poured in to the permanent moulds. Further, solidified preforms are machined to required ASTM standards and tested for different parameters.

    Figure 1: Alumina Particle Figure 2: Granite Particle

  3. TENSILE STRENGTH

    The tensile tests were carried out at a constant speed in Universal testing machine of 100KN capacity. The specimen prepared as per ASTM standard E08 and having dimensions of gauge length of 30mm and diameter 10mm, with a grip distance of 15mm and diameter 15mm.

    Table 1: Results of Tensile Test

    Sl NO

    NOMENCLATURE

    TENSILE STRENGTH (MPa)

    1

    Al6061 + 0% reinforcement

    392

    2

    Al6061 + 3% Graphite + 3% AL2O3

    403

    3

    Al6061 + 3% Graphite + 6% AL2O3

    407

    4

    Al6061 + 3% Graphite + 9% AL2O3

    378

    Tensile Strength

    410

    400

    390

    380

    370

    360

    0

    3

    6

    9

    Alumina %

  4. HARDNESS

    Tensile Strength

    Figure 3: Variation of Tensile Strength with reinforcement %

    The Hardness of the composites samples were measured using a

    Hardness is the resistance to plastic deformation (e.g., a local dent or scratch). Thus, it is a measure of plastic deformation.

    Leitz, Brinnel hardness measuring machine with a load of 100 N. The specimen prepared as per ASTM standard and the dimension of the specimen is 19X19 mm.

    Table 2 : Results of hardness test

    Sl NO

    NOMENCLATURE

    LOAD (N)

    BHN

    1

    Al6061 + 0% reinforcement

    250

    53

    2

    Al6061 + 3% Graphite + 3% AL2O3

    250

    58

    3

    Al6061 + 3% Graphite + 6% AL2O3

    250

    64

    4

    Al6061 + 3% Graphite + 9% AL2O3

    250

    69

    Hardness Number

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    0

    0

    3

    6

    9

    Alumina wt.%

    BHN

    Figure 4: Variation of BHN with reinforcement %

    The hardness of the composite material increases monotonically by significant amounts as the reinforcements particles content increases. As the AL2O3 reinforcement contents increased from 3% to 9% by weight with 3% Graphite constant, the hardness is increased by 30%. The percentage of increase in hardness as a variation of different reinforcement is shown in the table 1.

    The scanning electron microscope (SEM) is a type of electron microscope that images the sample surface by scanning it with a high- energy beam of electrons in a raster scan pattern. The electrons interact with the atoms that make up the sample producing signals that contains information about the samples surface topography, composition and other properties such as electrical conductivity.

  5. SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPE

Figure 5: AL6061+3%Graphite+3% AL2O3 Figure 6: AL6061+6% Graphite +3% AL2O3

Figure 7: AL6061+3% Graphite +9% AL2O3

SEM images reveals the distribution of particles, it shows a fair distribution of particles in to the matrix, white colour dots shows the presence of AL2O3 and black patches shows the presence of graphite.

CONCLUSION:

  • Using stir casting particulate metal matrix composite can be produced successfully

  • Addition of reinforcement particles with the aluminium increases the mechanical property and gives a better result.

  • Addition of 6% alumina with 3% Graphite in aluminium improves the hardness by 30 % and tensile strength is also increased.

  • SEM images shows a good distribution of reinforcements

  • For 9% alumina with 3% Graphite reinforcement there is a drop in tensile trength which may be due to the clustring of reinforcements as seen in SEM images (Figure 7)

REFERENCE

  1. Mohan Vanarotti, Shrishail P, B R Sridhar, K. Venkateshwarlu and

    S.A. Kori, 2014 Study of Mechanical Properties and Residual Stress on Post Wear Samples of A35-SiC Metal Matrix Composites ELSEVIER, PP.873 882.

  2. G.L Rajesh, V. Auradi, Umashankar and S.A Kori, 2014, Processing and Evaluating of Dry Sliding Wear Behaviour of B4Cp Reinforced Aluminium Matrix Composites, ELSEVIER, PP. 289- 294.

  3. J.Jebeen Moses, L.Dinaharan, S. Joseph Sekhar, 2014, Characterization of silicon carbide particulate reinforced AA6061 aluminum alloy composites produced via stir casting, ELSEVIER, PP. 106-112.

  4. K.R. Ravi. M. Saravana, R.M. Pillai, A. Mandal, B.S. Murthy, M. Chakraborty, B.C. Pai, 2008 Equal Channel Angular Pressing of Al-5wt.% Tib2 In Situ Composite, Journals of alloys and compounds 459, 239-243.

  5. Rohatgi P.K, R.Q. Guo, H Iksan and R. Asthana, 1998 Pressure Infiltration Technique for Sysnthesis of Aluminium-Fly ash Particulate Composite Material science engineering A, 244,22-30.

  6. Himanshu Kala, K.K.S Mer, Sandeep Kumar, 2014, A Review on Mechanical and Tribological Behaviours of Stir Cast Aluminium Matrix Composites, ELSEVIER, PP.1951 1960.

  7. K. Sekar, Allesu K., M.A. Joseph, 2014, Effect of T6 heat treatment in the microstructure and mechanical properties of A356 reinforced with nano Al2O3 particles by combination effect of stir and squeeze casting, ELSEVIER, PP. 444-453.

  8. D. Sai Chaitanya Kishore, K. Prahlada Rao, A. Mahamani, 2014, Effects of PCD and uncoated tungsten carbide inserts in turning of in-situ Al6061-TiC metal matrix composites, ELSEVIER, PP. 1574-1583.

  9. Viney Kumar, Rahul Dev Gupta, N K Batra, 2014, Comparisons of Mechanical Properties and effect of sliding velocity on wear properties of Al 6061, Mg 4%, Fly ash and Al 6061, Mg 4%, Graphite 4%, Fly ash Hybrid Metal matrix composite, ELSEVIER, PP. 1365-1375.

  10. C.S. Ramesh, R. Keshavamurthy, J. Madhusundhan, 2014, Fatigue behaviour of Ni-P coated Si3N4 reinforced Al6061 composites, ELSEVIER, PP. 1444-1454.

  11. Bharath V, Madev Nagaral, V Auradi and S. A. Kori, 2014, Preparation of 6061Al-Al2O3 MMCs by Stir Casting and Evaluation of Mechanical and Wear Properties, ELSEVIER, PP. 1658 1667.

  12. D. Sai Chaitanya Kishorea, K. Prahlada Rao, A. Mahamanic, 2014, Investigation of cutting force, surface roughness and flank wear in turning of In-situ Al6061-TiC metal matrix composite, ELSEVIER, PP. 1040 1050.

  13. V. Auradia, Rajesh G.L and S. A. Kori, 2014 Processing of B4C Particulate Reinforced 6061Aluminum Matrix Composites by melt stirring involving two-step addition, ELSEVIER, PP. 1068 1076.

  14. P.B.Pawar, Abhay A. Utpat, 2014, Development of Aluminium Based Silicon Carbide Particulate Metal Matrix Composite for Spur Gear, ELSEVIER, PP. 1150 1156.

  15. Bhargavi Rebba, N.Ramanaiah, 2014, Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Aluminium Alloy (Al-2024) Reinforced with Molybdenum Disulphide (MOS2) Metal Matrix Composites, ELSEVIER, PP. 1161 1169.

  16. R. Shobha, Dr. K.R. Suresh, Dr. H.B. Niranjan, 2014, Mechanical and Microstructure Evaluation of Insitu Aluminium Titanium Boride Composite Processed by Severe Plastic Deformation, ELSEVIER, PP. 281-288.

  17. Ajit Kumar Senapati, R.I. Ganguly, R.R. Dash, P.C. Mishra, B.C. Routra, 2014, Production, characterization and analysis of mechanical properties of a newly developed novel aluminium-silicon alloy based metal matrix composites, ELSEVIER, PP. 472-481.

  18. M. Sreenivasa Reddy, Dr. Soma, V. Chetty, Dr. Sudheer Premkumar, Reddappa H N, 2014, Influence of reinforcements and heat treatment on mechanical and wear properties of Al 7075 based hybrid composites, ELSEVIER, PP. 508-516.

  19. Siddesh Kumar N G, V M Ravindranath, G S Shiva Shankar, 2014, Mechanical and wear behaviour of aluminium metal matrix hybrid composites, ELSEVIER, PP. 908-917.

  20. Anju Sharma, Suresh Kumar, Gurmel Singh and O.P Pandey, 2014, Evaluation of Sliding Wear Behavior of Garnet Particle-Containing LM13 Alloy Composites, ELSEVIER, PP. 953-961.

  21. Balasubramanya H S, J. Sharana Basavarja, Ravi Kumar V, 2014, Wear rate behaviour of As-cast and heat treated hybrid Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites, ELSEVIER, PP. 1049-1055.

  22. Tony Thomas. A, Parameshwaran R, Muthukrishnan A, Arvind Kumarn.M, 2014, Development of Feeding & Stirring Mechanism for Stir Casting of Aluminium Matrix Composites, ELSEVIER, PP. 1182-1191.

  23. Gururaja Udupa, S. Shrikantha Rao, K. V. Gangadharan, 2014, Functionally graded Composite materials: An overview, ELSEVIER, PP. 1291-1299.

  24. M S Raviraj, C M Sharanprabhu, G C Mohankumar, 2014, Experimental analysis on processing and properties of Al-TiC metal matrix composites. ELSEVIER, PP. 2032-2038.

  25. Srinivasulu Reddy K, Sreedhar D, Nagesh P, Janardhana Raju G, 2014, Fabrication and Mechanical Properties of AlSi12 Nano Particulate Composite, ELSEVIER, PP. 149 158.

  26. R. Fuentes-Ramirez, A. Perez-Gonzalez, V. M. Castano Meneses, 2010, Improved wear resistance of an aluminium-Zirconia composite, Metal Science and Heat Treatment, Vol. 52.

  27. Hari Prasada Rao Pydi, Balamurugan Adhithan, A.Syed Bava Bakrudeen, 2013, Microstructure Exploration of the Aluminum- Tungsten Carbide Composite with different Manufacturing circumstances, Volume-2, Issue-6.

  28. Srikanth.B.G, Amarnath.G, 2013, Microstructure and tribological behaviour of aluminium reinforced with tungsten carbide particulate and flyash metal matrix composites.

  29. Dharmesh M. Patoliya, Sunil Sharma, 2015, Preparation and Characterization of Zirconium Dioxide Reinforced Aluminium Metal Matrix Composites, Vol. 4, Issue 5.

  30. J.Jenix Rino, Dr.D.Sivalingappa, Halesh Koti, V.Daniel Jebin, 2013, Properties of Al6063 MMC Reinforced With Zircon Sand and Alumina.

  31. Sachin Malhotra, Ram Narayan and R.D Gupta, 2013, Synthesis and Characterization of Aluminium 6061 Alloy-Flyash & Zirconia Metal Matrix Composite, INPRESSCO, Vol.3, No.5.

  32. S. Gopalakrishnan, N. Murugan, 2012, Production and wear characterisation of AA 6061 matrix titanium carbide particulate reinforced composite by enhanced stir casting method, ELSEVIER, PP. 302308.

Leave a Reply