Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Productivity and Soil Fertility in Wheat-based Cropping System

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV3IS050966

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Productivity and Soil Fertility in Wheat-based Cropping System

Pramod Kumar1, Fateh Singp, Ravindra Kumar3, Vishwajeet Singh4, Ajay Pratap Singp

Asstt. Prof. 1 Retd. Prof. 2 Assoc. Prof.3 Asstt. Prof.4 Ph.D. Scholar5

1, 2, 3, 4 Regional Agriculture Research Station, Kalai, Aligarh, C.S. Azad University of Agric. & Tech.,

Kanpur , Uttar Pradesh, India.

5 Department Of Applied Science, Mangalayatan University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract Six year field experimentation with ten treatments consisted of FYM, vermicompost, green manure, nadep compost, azospirillum, azotobacter, rice residue, haulms (green gram/black gram) incorporation and NPK fertilizers at Kalai (Aligarh) research station of

    1. Azad University of Agriculture & Technology, Kanpur, indicated that higher value of grain yield of wheat (4286kg ha-1) was recorded when wheat was grown after rice with residual effect of FYM (10t ha-1 ) followed by vermicompost (5t ha-1 ) and nadep compost (5t ha-1 ) alongwith three-fourth quantity of N (90kg ha-1) as compared to the yield (4018 Kg ha-1) obtained with recommended dose of N(120kg ha-1). The experimental results also indicated that one-fourth quantity of N (30 Kg ha-1) could be reduced with the application of azotobacter alone or in combination with residual effect of biodynamic compost or incorporation of haulms (green gram/black gram) or green manuring of sesbania in-situ with rice residue incorporation without any significant decrease in the yield of wheat. Cultivation of rice and wheat on recommended dose of NPK fertilizers alone decreased the organic carbon, available P and K contents of the soil. Application of FYM, vermicompost, nadep compost, biofertilizers alone or along with biodynamic compost, green manuring, residue / haulms incorporation supplemented by NPK fertilizers improved the soil fertility.

      Keywords Nitrogen, Productivity, Wheat, Soil fertility, Cropping system.

      1. INTRODUCTION

        Continuous use of chemical fertilizers, increased the crop yield during initial stage, but adversely affected the sustainability at a later stage. Indiscriminate use of chemical fertilizers especially, urea resulted in deficiency of nutrients other than the applied and caused decline in soil organic carbon singh et al; [1] Cereal crops generally require a good supply of major nutrients especially nitrogen during most of their crop growth period. The availability of N in the soil has

        been known to be prime factor in determining over all growth and yield. Thus N in the soil plays a dominant role in the nutrition of crops. Incorporation of organic material not only supply nutrients but also improve soil health. Hence, judicious application of chemical fertilizers along with manures (organic matter) would help in arresting decline in soil fertility besides reducing gap between the potential and actual yields to a larger extent. Keeping this in view the present investigation was undertaken to study the effect of nutrient management on yield and changes in soil fertility in wheat based cropping system under semi-arid conditions of Uttar Pradesh.

      2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

        A field experiment was conducted at Kalai ,Aligarh research station of C.S. Azad University of Agriculture and Technology Kanpur (U.P.) for six consecutive years beginning in Kharif 2004. Experimental soil was sandy loam in texture having PH (1 : 1.25) 7.5, EC (1 : 1.25) 0.59 dsm-1, organic carbon 0.47% and available P2O5 and K2O as 13.5 and 112.5 Kgha-1 respectively. Crops grown were rice (Pant-12), green gram (HUM-2), black gram (PU-35) and wheat (PBW-343). Details of ten treatment comprised of FYM (0.6% N, 0.3%P, 0.5%K), vermicompost (1.3%, 0.6%P, 0.9%K), Nadep Compost (0.9%N, 0.5%P, 0.7%K), biodynamic compost, green manuring, azospirillum, azotobacter, crop residue/ haulms incorporation and NPK fertilizers are given in table-1. Biodynamic compost used was cow pat pit (CPP) manure (1.3%N, 0.4%P, 0.5%K and 249x106g-1 total microbial count) prepared using biodynamic compost preparations (BD 502-

        507) with cow dung and was applied as root treatment ( 5kgha-

        1) in rice. Manurial treatments were applied in kharif each year. In rice and wheat half dose of nitrogen and full dose of phosphate (DAP) and potash (MOP) were applied as basal and rest half N was top dressed, In green and black gram full doses

        of N and P were applied as basal. The amount of nitrogen applied through DAP was adjusted in the amount applied through urea. The experiment was laid out in completely randomized block design with four replications. The statistical analyses were carried

        Table-1 Details of treatments during Kharif and Rabi each year

        Treat ments

        Crop-rotation

        Kharif

        Rabi

        T1

        Rice- wheat

        NPK(120:60:60)*

        NPK(120:60:60)*

        T2

        Rice- wheat

        F+NPK(90:60:60)

        NPK(90:60:60)

        T3

        Rice- wheat

        VC+NPK(90:60:60)

        NPK(90:60:60)

        T4

        Rice- wheat

        NC+NPK(90:60:60)

        NPK(90:60:60)

        T5

        Rice- wheat

        BC+Azos+NPK(90:60:60)

        Azot+NPK(90:60:60)

        T6

        Rice- wheat

        Azos +NPK(90:60:60)

        Azot+NPK(90:60:60)

        T7

        GM-Rice- wheat

        NPK(90:60:60)

        RRI+NPK(90:60:60)

        T8

        Green gram-wheat

        NPK(20:40:0)

        GHI+NPK(90:60:60)

        T9

        Black gram- wheat

        NPK(20:40:0)

        BHI+NPK(90:60:60)

        T10

        Rice- wheat

        NPK(0:0:0)

        NPK(0:0:0)

        *RDF = Recommended dose of fertilizer F = FYM (Farm yard manure (10t ha¹) VC = Vermicompost (5t ha¹) NC = Nadep compost (5t ha¹) BC = Biodynamic compost (5kg ha¹) Azos = Azospirillum Azot = Azotobacter GM = Green manuring of sesbania in-situ (@15t ha¹ fresh weight) RRI = Rice residue incorporation GHI = Green gram haulms incorporation BHI = Black gram haulms incorporation

        out according to standard method. Soil samples collected at harvest of wheat crop were air dried, ground, passed through 2 mm sieve analyzed for organic carbon, available P and K using standard procedure.

      3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

        Grain yield of wheat

        The different treatments influenced the grain yield of wheat (Table-2). The residual effect of organic manures applied in kharif (Once a year) was observed on yield of succeeding rabi crop (wheat). The higher grain yield of wheat (4286, 4203, 4193 kgha-1) for consecutive six years was recorded when wheat was grown after rice with residual effect of FYM (10t ha-1), vermicompost (5t ha-1) and Nadep compost (5t ha-1) along with three-fourth quantity of nitrogen (90Kg ha-1) as compared to the grain yield (4018 kgha-1) obtained with recommended dose of N (120 kg ha-1). Wheat yield obtained from the plots after green manuring of sesbania in situ in kharif coupled with rice residue incorporation or application of biodynamic compost + azotobacter or azotobacter alone or haulms incorporation along with similar quantity of

        nitrogen (90 kgha-1) was at par with the yield recorded in recommended dose of nitrogen.. he experimental results indicated that application of FYM (10t ha-1) or vermicompost (5t ha-1) or Nadep compost (5t ha-1) during kharif not only reduced the N fertilizer requirement by 30 kgha-1 but also increased the wheat yield. Similar reduction to the tune of 30 KgNha-1 in the recommended dose of N could be made with green manuring + rice residue incorporation or application of biodynamic compost+azotobacter or azotobacter alone or through haulms (green gram / black gram) incorporation, without any adverse effect on grain yield of wheat. Higher yield of wheat with FYM or vermicompost or nadep compost may be attributed to the fact that applied quantity of these organic manures not only effectively supplemented the reduced quantity of N (30 kgha-1) but supplied additional amount of nutrients too. The effect of biodynamic compost + biofertilizers or biofertilizers alone or green manuring + rice residue incorporation or haulms incorporation failed to supply additional amount, resulting in yield at par with 120 kgNha-1. Beneficial effects of integrated use of manures, biofertilizers along with chemical fertilizers were also reported by Singh and Chauhan [2]; Singh et al. [3].

        Table-2 Grain yield of wheat (kg ha¹) as influenced by different treatments

        Treat Ments

        2004-05

        2005-06

        2006-07

        2007-08

        2008-09

        2009-10

        Average

        T1

        3858

        4002

        4013

        3945

        4253

        4035

        4018

        T2

        3927

        4222

        4282

        4375

        4595

        4318

        4286

        T3

        3917

        4135

        4145

        4256

        4506

        4257

        4203

        T4

        3929

        4124

        4175

        4267

        4538

        4130

        4193

        T5

        3828

        4135

        4010

        4015

        4344

        4070

        4067

        T6

        3826

        3827

        3924

        4070

        4334

        4095

        4012

        T7

        3852

        4028

        4035

        4240

        4315

        4190

        4110

        T8

        3860

        4012

        4021

        4127

        4346

        4167

        4089

        T9

        3863

        4025

        4032

        4138

        4355

        4105

        4086

        T10

        1213

        1413

        1362

        1375

        1538

        1019

        1320

        CD(P=0.05)

        250

        221

        260

        81

        113

        91

        Table-3 Effect of treatments on grain yield of Kharif crops (kg ha¹)

        Treat ments

        2004

        2005

        2006

        2007

        2008

        2009

        Average

        T1

        4112

        4011

        4005

        4000

        4325

        4168

        4104

        T2

        4225

        4327

        4386

        4422

        4505

        4423

        4381

        T3

        4265

        4320

        4367

        4484

        4485

        4356

        4380

        T4

        4213

        4312

        4353

        4382

        4415

        4356

        4339

        T5

        4300

        4300

        4203

        4217

        4335

        4305

        4276

        T6

        4110

        4015

        4000

        4012

        4270

        4210

        4102

        T7

        4735

        4637

        4558

        4577

        4780

        4588

        4646

        T8

        1118

        1104

        1025

        1100

        1405

        1245

        1166

        T9

        1022

        1012

        1108

        1112

        1250

        1335

        1140

        T10

        1727

        1510

        1536

        1510

        1345

        1200

        1471

        Table-4 Effect of treatments on fertility status of soil ( After and 2nd, 4th and 6th year)

        Treat ments

        Organic carbon (%)

        Available PO (kg ha)

        Available KO (kg ha)

        II year

        IV year

        VI year

        II year

        IV year

        VI year

        II year

        IV year

        VI year

        T1

        0.46

        0.43

        0.40

        12.75

        11.65

        10.95

        110.30

        100.45

        100.00

        T2

        0.61

        0.67

        0.70

        18.10

        21.95

        24.00

        142.15

        207.10

        219.15

        T3

        0.55

        0.63

        0.68

        16.61

        19.78

        21.85

        138.15

        200.77

        215.00

        T4

        0.58

        0.62

        0.64

        18.20

        20.90

        22.15

        141.40

        202.70

        213.20

        T5

        0.51

        0.59

        0.63

        14.10

        15.10

        15.68

        120.15

        124.40

        127.10

        T6

        0.49

        0.51

        0.55

        14.10

        15.60

        16.65

        121.20

        128.10

        135.00

        T7

        0.54

        0.60

        0.66

        15.05

        15.75

        16.00

        130.27

        158.10

        168.00

        T8

        0.52

        0.63

        0.65

        14.70

        16.25

        17.35

        126.60

        152.55

        158.05

        T9

        0.52

        0.62

        0.64

        14.80

        16.75

        17.70

        127.00

        152.45

        159.05

        T10

        0.39

        0.30

        0.26

        10.65

        8.10

        7.25

        102.00

        100.70

        95.00

        Grain yield of Kharif crops (rice, green gram, black gram)

        The highest grain yield of rice (4646 Kgha-1) was recorded when rice was grown after reen manuring of sesbania in situ along with three- fourth quantity of recommended dose of N (Table-3). Application of FYM or vermicompost or nadep compost or biodynamic compost+azospirillum along with reduced quantity of N (90 Kgha-1) yielded higher as compared to the yield recorded with recommended dose of N (120 Kgha-1). The response of azospirillum alone was found at par with the recommended dose of nitrogen. Early decomposition of succulant legume like sesbania might have caused early release and availability of plant nutrients and in turn might have resulted in higher yield of rice. Increase in yield of rice with green manuring was also reported by Singh et. al. [3]. The differences in the yield of green gram and black gram were negligible.

        Organic Carbon

        Organic carbon content of surface soil (Table-4) increased with the application of manures along with chemical fertilizers. The increase in the organic carbon content in manurial treatment combinations is attributed to direct incorporation of organic matter in the soil. The subsequent decomposition of these materials could have resulted in enhanced organic carbon content of the soil. Application of biofertilizers (azospirillum / azotobacter) also enhanced organic carbon content but to a lesser extent as compared to manures. Residue incorporation also improved organic carbon content considerably and found to be equivalent to the application of manures. Application of NPK fertilizers alone and absolute control showed negative impact and reduced organic carbon by 0.07% and 0.21% respectively. Increase in organic carbon status with combined use of organic manures or residue incorporation with fertilizers was also reported by Singh et. al [4]

        Available Phosphorus

        Available phosphorus content of the surface soil (Table-4) increased appreciably with the application of manures along with chemical fertilizers as compared to sole application of NPK fertilizers which registered negative impact and reduced by 18.9%. Highest available phosphorus was observed with the application of FYM followed by nadep and vermicompost. The increased available P of soil might be due to release of CO2 and organic acids during decomposition, which helps in solubilizing the native P. Addition of organic manure like FYM, with inorganic fertilizers had the beneficial effect in increasing phosphate availability Singh and Singh [5].

        Available Potassium

        Available Potassium content of surface soil [ Table-4] increased appreciably with the application ofmanures, biofertilizers and residue incorporation along with chemical fertilizers.Higher availability could be ascribed to direct addition of potassium to the potassium pool of soil besides reduction in potassium fixation and release of potassium due to interaction of organic matter with clay. Beneficial effects of manure on K availability were also reported by Das et. al. [6].

      4. CONCLUSION

        One-fourth quantity (30 Kgha-1) of recommended dose of nitrogen could be reduced with the application of FYM (10t ha-1) or vermicompost (5t ha-1) or Nadep compost (5t ha-1) once a year during kharif to obtain higher yield of wheat. It was also concluded that green manuring in kharif coupled with rice residue incorporation or application of azotobacter alone or in combination with biodynamic compost or haulms (green or black gram) incorporation contributed 30 kg N ha-1 and sustained yield level of wheat, which were at par with the application of recommended dose of N(120 kgha-1).

        Cultivation of rice and wheat on recommended

        dose of fertilizers reduced organic carbon, available P and K content of soil.

      5. REFERENCES

  1. Singh N.P., Sachan R.S., Pandey P.C. and Bhistri P.S. Effect of a decade long fertilizer and manure application on soil fertility and productivity of rice-wheat system in a Mollisol. Journal of the Indian society of soil science. Vol. 47 pp 72-80, 1999.

  2. Singh R.D. and Chauhan V.S. Impact of inorganic fertilizers and organic manures on soil productivity under wheat-ragi system. Journal of the Indian society of soil science. Vol. 50 pp 62-63, 2002.

  3. Singh F., Kumar R., Pal S. Integrated nutrient management in rice- wheat cropping system for sustainable productivity. Journal of the Indian society of soil science Vol. 56 pp 205-208, 2008.

  4. Singh F., Kumar R., Pal S., Hussain M.F. and Kaliyar R.P. Effect of integrated use of organic manure, green manure, chemical and biofertilizers on efficient production of wheat and fertility of an inceptisol. Farm science Journal Vol. 14 (2) pp 29-32, 2005.

  5. .Singh M., and Singh V.P. Soil dynamics and budgeting of phosphorus as influenced by cattle manure, green manure and fertilizer N in rice- wheat system on vestisol. National Seminar on Development in soil science. Indian society of soil science New Delhi pp 139-140, 2002.

  6. Das A., Prasad M. and Gautam R.C. Residual effect of organic and inorganic sources of nitrogen applied to cotton on succeeding wheat. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 49 pp 143-146, 2004

Leave a Reply