Effect of Size of Aggregate on Self Compacting Concrete

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTCONV5IS11043

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Effect of Size of Aggregate on Self Compacting Concrete

Hitesh*. Mr. Sumit Kumar**

*M.Tech Scholar, Gateway College of Engineering, Sonipat, Haryana.

**H.O.D, Gateway College of Engineering, Sonipat, Haryana

Abstract – Concrete is a adaptable extensively used construction material. Ever since concrete has been established as a material for construction, investigate ers have been trying to improve its quality and develop its presentation. Fresh changes in construction industry demand superior durability of structures. At present there is a large weight on presentation aspect of concrete. One such thought has lead to the development of Self Compacting Concrete (SCC). It is measured as the most revolutionary development in concrete construction. SCC is a new kind of High presentation Concrete (HPC) with excellent deformability and segregation resistance. It can flow through and fill the gaps of reinforcement and corners of moulds without any need for vibration and compaction during the placing process

  1. INTRODUCTION

    The adaptability and the appliance of concrete in the construction industry need not be emphasized. investigate on normal and high strength concrete has been on the agenda for more than two decades. . High Building elements made of high strength concrete are usually densely reinforced. This congestion of strengthening leads to serious problems while concreting. Densely reinforced concrete problems can be solved by using concrete that can be easily placed and spread in between the congested reinforced concrete elements. A highly homogeneous, well spread and dense concrete can be ensured using such a type of concrete. Self-compacting concrete (SCC) is a concrete, which flows and compacts only under gravity. It fill the mould completely with no any defects. More often than not self-compacting concretes have compressive strengths in the variety of 60-

    100 N/mm2. SCC is a new kind of High Performance Concrete (HPC) which has an excellent deformability and segregation resistance. By name it can be defined as a concrete, which can flow through and fill the gaps of reinforcement and corners of the moulds without any need for external vibration. SCC compacts itself due to its self weight and de-aerates almost completely while elegant in the formwork. SCC can also be used in situations where it is difficult or impossible to use mechanical compaction for fresh concrete, such as underwater concreting, cast in-situ pile foundations, machine bases and columns or walls with congested reinforcement. The high flow capability of SCC makes it possible to fill the formwork without vibration.

  2. SOME OF THE COMPENSATION OF SELF COMPACTING CONCRETE ARE AS FOLLOWS

    1. Less noise from vibrators and reduced danger from Hand Arm Vibration Syndrome (HAVS). And pace of placement, resulting in increased production efficiency.

    2. Ease of placement, requiring fewer workers for exacting pour.

    3. Superior assurances of adequate uniform consolidation.

    4. Reduced wear and tear on forms from vibrator.

    5. Reduced wear on mixers due to reduced shearing action and. Increased bond strength.

  3. MEANS FOR ACHIEVING SELF-

    COMPATIBILITY:

    Simply increasing the water content in a mix to achieve a flowable concrete like SCC is obviously not a viable option. The main mechanism controlling the balance between higher flow ability and stability are related to surface chemistry. The development of SCC has thus been strongly dependent on surface active admixtures as well as on the increased specific surface area obtained through the used fillers.

  4. THE FOLLOWING METHODS TO ACHIEVE

    SELF-COMPATIBILITY

    1. Limited aggregate content

    2. Low water-powder ratio

    3. Use of Super Plasticizer (SP)

  5. FLOW CHART OF SCC MIX DESIGN

    SCC Mix Design

    Data: Grade of concrete

    Bulk Density of coarse aggregate

    Calculation of coarse and fine aggregate

    Calculation of mixing water content

    Calculation of Fly ash content

    Calculation of super plasticizer

  6. PROPERTIES OF SCC FRESH SCC MIXES MUST MEET THREE KEY PROPERTIES

    1. Ability to flow into and completely fill intricate and complex forms under its own weight

    2. Ability to pass through and bond to congested reinforcement under its own weight.

    3. High resistance to aggregate segregation.

    1. INVESTIGATIONAL PROGRAM

      The Investigational program consisted of casting and testing specimens for arriving at the maximum size of aggregate (20, 12.5, 10 mm). The mix proportion for M70 grade was arrived, taking the different sizes of aggregate into consideration. The effective size of aggregate was arrived for M70 grade of concrete, based on the mechanical properties and fresh properties of SCC. A total of 27 cubes of standard size 150 mm x 150 mm x 150 mm, 27 prisms of standard size 100

      mm x 100 mm x 500 mm and 27 cylinders of 150 mm diameter and 300 mm height were cast for determining the compressive strength, flexural strength and split tensile strength respectively.

      1. Fresh properties of M 70 grade SCC

        S.

        No

        Size of Aggregate

        Slump Flow value

        T50

        V-

        Funnel

        V-

        Funnel at T5 Minutes

        L-Box H2/H1

        (blocking ratio)

        1

        20 mm

        720

        mm

        5

        Sec

        9 Sec

        12 Sec

        1

        2

        12.5 mm

        725

        mm

        5

        Sec

        6 Sec

        8 Sec

        1

        3

        10 mm

        735

        mm

        5

        Sec

        7 Sec

        9 Sec

        1

      2. Compressive strength of M 70 grade SCC

        Size of Aggregate

        3 Days

        7 Days

        28 Days

        20 mm

        31.8

        46.3

        74

        12.5 mm

        36.2

        49

        77.1

        10 mm

        38.33

        49.66

        79.3

      3. Split tensile strength of M 70 grade SCC

        VII. THE MAIN OBJECTIVE OF THE PRESENT

        Size Aggregate

        of

        3 Days

        7 Days

        28 Days

        INVESTIGATION

        20 mm

        2.4

        6.04

        9.15

        To study of effect of the size of aggregate on the strength

        12.5 mm

        2.8

        5.9

        9.62

        and flow of M70 grade of Self compacting concrete by

        10 mm

        2.85

        6.36

        9.95

        using Nansu mix design procedure. With the above

        objectives in mind the Investigational program is

        Size of Aggregate

        3 Days

        7 Days

        28 Days

        20 mm

        4.03

        6.75

        <>8.5

        12.5 mm

        4.6

        7.47

        9.13

        categorized as detailed below. Casting of 27 standard cubes, 27 standard cylinders and 27 standard prisms, covering M70 grade of concrete, three aggregate sizes, three periods of curing and three specimens of each type.

        In this study, high strength (M70) of SCC with three different maximum size of aggregate (20, 12.5, 10 mm) were designed based on Nan Su method, to determine the effective maximum size of aggregate. The grade of concrete and age of curing were the parameters in the study.

      4. Flexural strength of M 70 grade SCC

    2. EFFECT OF SIZE OF AGGREGATE ON THE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF SCC

    3. CONCLUSIONS

      Based on the methodical and full Investigational study conduct on SCC mixes with an endeavor to develop piece mixes, the following are the conclusions arrived.

      1. The mixes designed using the lower size of aggregate yielded better fresh properties than higher size of aggregates.

      2. As the strength of concrete increases, the effective size of aggregate has decreased.

      Significant contribution of the Project:

    4. SCOPE OF THE FUTURE WORK

      1. The basic mix design methodology was presented may be extended to the more number of concrete strength ranges.

      2. The investigations may be conducted with different mineral admixtures like Rice Husk Ash and GGBS apart from fly ash.

    5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I would like to express a deep sense of gratitude and thanks profusely to our guide MR. Sumit Kumar, H.O.D in Department of Civil Engineering, Gateway College of Engineering Sonipat. Without his wise counsel and able guidance, it would have impossible to complete these paper.

REFERENCES

  1. Bouzoubaa N, Lachemi M. Self-compacting concrete incorporating high volumes of class F fly ash: Preliminary results, Cement and Concrete Investigate , 2001, Vol. 31, No.3, pp 413-420.

  2. EFNARC. Specification and guidelines for self- compacting concrete, European Federation of Producers and Applicators of Specialist Products for Structures, 2002.

  3. EFNARC. Specification and guidelines for self- compacting concrete, European Federation of Producers and Applicators of Specialist Products for Structures, May 2005.

  4. Jaya Shankar R, Hemalatha T, Palanichamy.K and Santhakumar. S, Influence of fly ash and VMA on properties of self compactingconcrete, National Conference on Advances in materials and mechanics of concrete structures Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Madras, Chennai 12-13 August2005, pp 25 32.

  5. Nan Su, Kung-Chung Hsub and His-Wen Chai. A simple mix design method for self-compacting concrete. Cement and Concrete Investigate , 2001, Vol. 31, pp1799 1807.

  6. Okamura H, Ozawa K.Mix design for self-compacting concrete. Concrete Library of Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, 1995, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp107-120.

  7. Okamura Hajime and Ouchi Masahiro. Self Compacting Concrete. Journal of advanced concrete technology, 2003, Vol.1, No.1, pp5 15.

  8. Ouchi M, Current conditions of self-comapcting concrete in Japan. The 2nd International RILEM Symposium on Self-Compacting Concrete, 2001.Ozawa K, Ouchi M, editors, pp 63-68.

  9. Subramanian, S. and Chattopadhyay D. Experiments for mix proportioning of self-compacting concrete, The Indian Concrete Journal, 2002, pp.13-20.

Leave a Reply