Effects Of Hydrolytic Aging On Glass/Epoxy, Kevlar/Epoxy, And Hybrid (Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy) Composites

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV2IS50859

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Effects Of Hydrolytic Aging On Glass/Epoxy, Kevlar/Epoxy, And Hybrid (Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy) Composites

C. Ramesh, V. Arumugam #, Joseph Stanley, Vijaya Kumar*

Aerospace Department, Anna University, Chennai.

# Aerospace Department, Anna University, Chennai.

Aeronautics Department, Hindustan University, Chennai.

*Aerospace Department, Anna University, Chennai

Abstract

The primary objective of the research is to develop a fundamental understanding of the effects of hygrothermal exposure on Glass/Epoxy, Kevlar/Epoxy, and Hybrid (Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy) composites. Moisture absorption and its effects on the tensile and flexural strength of the above mentioned composite specimens have been studied. To study the effect of moisture on the Flexural strength 24 number of Glass/Epoxy and 24 number Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy ASTM D 790-02 Flexural Specimens is used. The specimens were conditioned by immersing them into collected sea water and tested for five different periods (every month). The aged and unaged specimens are tested under Uni axial tension and Flexure (3-Point bending) loads using Instron 3367 Universal Testing Machine (UTM). The amount of degradation and the mode of failures of the aged specimens are also investigated. The percentage reduction in tensile and Flexural strength of aged and unaged specimens is analyzed. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) micrograph is used to find out the degradation of the specimens immersed into sea water, and the EDAX results are used to estimate the changes in chemical composition , the atom percentage and weight percentage of the specimens immersed into sea water .

  1. Introduction

    The Environmental effects are known to cause degradation of the composite and consequent loss of mechanical properties. Considerable efforts were made by researchers to study the effects of moisture and temperature and to develop analytical models for the diffusion process in various composites. G, S.Springer [1] presented extensive work on the moisture absorption behavior of neat epoxy resin, glass and graphite fiber composites based on a Fickian diffusion model. R.Gopalan and M.V.V.Murthy [2] showed that experimental data for simple and hybrid composites comprising both permeable and impermeable fibres have good correlation with the analytical Fickian diffusion model and hence the Fickian model is adequate to characterize these composites for the through thickness moisture diffusion. Edge coating has significant effect on the saturated moisture content in the impermeable fiber composites.

    As the properties of any composite depend on the behavior of the matrix, fibres and the interface, it seems essential to know the rate of water absorption in glass/epoxy composites in order to predict their long term behavior. In many cases water absorption obeys Ficks law and diffusion is driven by the water concentration gradient between the environment and the material producing continuous absorption until saturation is reached [3].R.Gopalan, R.Somashekar and Dattaguru [4] revealed that the moisture absorption in a fiber- matrix composites is by the matrix and fiber -matrix interface in the case of impermeable fibres and fiber and fiber matrix interface in the case of permeable fiber composite. The moisture absorption causes degradation of strength and stiffness of composites. The degradation is a function of fiber orientation and is quite significant on the matrix dominated properties. The failure process monitored by acoustic emission technique revealed that the effect of hygrothermal altering the failure mechanism from gradual to brittle and catastrophic. G.S.Springer and J.M.Tang [5] presented for accelerated environmental testing of composite which shows the test conditions required to achieve desired moisture content in the shortest time. Data obtained with fiberite T300/934 fabric show that the moisture contents and mechanical properties of the material are nearly the same after regular and accelerated environmental conditioning.

    Testing of hydrothermal Effects on Durability and Moisture Kinetics of fiber-Reinforce Polymer Composites is done by Padmavathi Surathi Vistasp M. Karbhari. The kinetics of fluid sorption E-glass/vinyl ester composites is studied widely using The Fickian and Langmuir diffusion models. The time and temperature dependence of the rate of diffusion and maximum moisture content are analyzed and moisture kinetics data is assessed for performance predictions. It is seen that various processes of degradation, both reversible and irreversible, are induced in the composite materials on exposure to moisture. The durability characteristics of unidirectional E-glass-Vinyl ester composites under the influence of relative humidity and immersion in water at different temperatures are investigated. [6]

    The Effect of Aging Environment on the Degradation of Glass Reinforced Epoxy by Somjai Kajorncheappungam; Rakesh R. Gupta and Hota V.S. Ganga Rao. The effects of immersing coupons of glass-reinforced epoxy in four different

    liquid media at two separate temperatures were investigated in this study aimed at examining the durability of fiber- reinforced plastics currently being used in the construction industry. Composite samples were soaked for up to 5 months in distilled water, a saturated salt solution (30g/100 cc NaCl), a 5 molar NaOH solution, and a 1 molar HCl solution Aging was conducted at room temperature and at 60 °C. Results show that commercial epoxy resins used in GFRPs are fairly durable. It was found that all the solutions marginally degraded the mechanical properties of the neat resin, especially at the higher temperature; this was mainly the result of polymer hydrolysis. The strength of the composites however, was reduced by more than 70% by the acid at room temperature and by the alkali at the elevated temperature. Water immersion was less damaging than either acid or alkali soaking, and immersion in brine had the least effect on mechanical properties. As evidenced by SEM micrographs, the worst cases of damage involved attack on the glass fibers in acid at 60oC compared to room temperature. Therefore, reinforcing glass fibers have to be protected from attack by liquid media to improve the durability of composites.[7]

    The failure behaviour and determination of the effects of seawater on composites is carried out by Catherine A. Wood & Walter L.Bradley (1996) Specimens were tested in transverse tension in an environmental Scanning electron Microscope.[8].S.K.Rege, and S.C.Lakkad (1983) found the degradation in compressive, interlaminar and flexural strength is much more severe in salt water than in distilled water. The percentage weight gain is also higher in salt water. [9] Krystyna Imielinska and Laurent Guillaumat (2004) studied glass and aramid laminates are commonly used light weight materials. The water immersion affected microstuctural integrity of the two composites causing numerous internal defects.[10].M. Akay, S. Kong Ah Mud & A. Stanley (1996) Moisture absorption behaviour and the influence of moisture on the thermal and mechanical properties of Kevlar-49/epoxy- resin laminates have been studied. The laminates were prepared by two different routes, namely autoclaving and oven-curing, and their properties were compared.[11]

    Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) composites offer many advantages over conventional materials for applications in the marine and civil infrastructure areas. Their increasing widespread use emphasizes the need to predict their performance over long periods of time after being subjected to exposure to different environmental conditions. Te effects of sea water exposure on Glass/Epoxy, Kevlar/Epoxy, and Hybrid (Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy) composites, moisture absorption and its effects on the tensile and flexural strength of the above mentioned composite specimens have been studied.

  2. Experimental Procedure

    1. Materials

      The reinforcement fibres used in this work were Glass fibres and Kevlar fibres. The matrix material used was a home- formulated epoxy resin (bisphenol-A type). The physical

      properties of carbon fibres, Kevlar fibres, and epoxy resin employed in this study were presented in Table.1

    2. Fabrication

      The GFRP, Kevlar fiber mats were cut at a size of 30cm* 30cm from the fabric. Twelve such fiber mats are required for a Laminate. The epoxy resin is taken at a mass ratio of one to that of the fiber mats and hardener is mixed with the resin at a mass ratio of 0.1. The Laminates were fabricated by hand layup method using a compression moulding machine at a pressure of about 100bar for 24 hours. After curing the Laminates were removed from the mould and cut into tensile specimens as per ASTM D3039 by using Water Jet cutting machine. The Flexural specimens are cut from the laminate as per ASTM D790-02 by Using Water jet cutting machine.

      Fig.1 Schematic Representation of Tensile Test

      Specimen

      Fig.2 Schematic Representation of Flexural Test

      Specimen

      The fabricated tensile, flexural specimens were immersed into collected sea water for period of 1month, 2months, 3months, 4months and 5 months duration.

        1. Water absorption test

          The initial weights of Glass/Epoxy, Kevlar/Epoxy and Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy tensile and flexural specimens are measured using a digital weighing machine. Then the specimens are immersed in sea water over different periods of time. The final weight of the samples is measured after taking out the specimens from sea water. The percentage of water absorption in the composites was estimated by finding out the

          difference in weights of the samples before and after aging using the following equation.

          = m m0

          m0

          Where,

          M(t) is moisture uptake,

          Mo is the specimen before ageing Mt is the specimen during ageing

        2. Mechanical testing

      The SPECIMENS were subjected to uni-axial tensile test 30kN INSTRON 3367 universal testing machine.

      Fig.3. Uni-axial tensile test universal testing machine

      The crosshead speed was limited to 0.1mm/min and sampling rate was set to 30pts/sec for tensile Specimens, and 0.5mm/min and sampling rate was set to 30pts/sec for flexural specimens (3 point bending).

  3. Results and Discussion

    The moisture absorption curves of the glass/epoxy, Kevlar/epoxy, and glass/Kevlar/epoxy hybrid composites are shown in fig 4a and 4b, where moisture uptake is plotted against the immersing time. The absorption is more in Kevlar and hybrid when comparing glass.

    1. Influence of moisture on failure load

      Table 1 represents the results of ultimate failure load of the tensile and flexural specimens for both unaged and sea water immersed specimen. It can be seen that moisture absorption causes the change in the ultimate failure load as determined in the tensile and flexural tests.

    2. Influence of moisture on the modulus

      The table 2 lists the percentage reduction in tensile modulus for Kevlar/Epoxy, Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy and Glass/Epoxy specimens immersed in sea water for a period from 1-5 months when compared with the tensile modulus of unaged Kevlar/Epoxy, Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy and Glass/Epoxy specimen.

      Fig.4a water absorption curve for tensile specimen

      Fig.4b water absorption curve for flexural specimen Table 1: Ultimate failure load of tensile specimens

      ULTIMATE FAILURE LOAD

      Tensile Specimens

      Flexural Specimens

      Duration

      Glass

      Hybrid

      Kevlar

      Hybrid

      Glass

      Un aged

      13.94

      14.34

      21.25

      0.1239

      0.1861

      1 Month

      12.57

      12.09

      19.45

      0.1005

      0.1327

      2 Month

      11.87

      11.34

      17.46

      0.0908

      0.1183

      3 Month

      8.338

      10.87

      14.4

      0.0852

      0.0989

      4 Month

      7.735

      10.02

      13.85

      0.0749

      0.0916

      5 Month

      6.174

      7.398

      12.38

      0.0649

      0.0854

      Table 2: Percentage Reduction of tensile modulus

      TENSILE MODULUS (MPa)

      Duration

      Kevla r

      % of reduct ion

      Kevla r/Epo xy

      % of reduct ion

      Glass

      % of reduct ion

      Un aged

      14450

      0

      12960

      0

      13170

      0

      1 month

      13990

      3.183

      12560

      3.086

      12940

      1.746

      2 month

      12860

      11.00

      12330

      4.861

      12580

      4.479

      3 month

      11530

      20.20

      11630

      10.26

      11850

      10.02

      4 month

      10345

      28.40

      10745

      17.09

      11260

      14.50

      5 month

      9878

      31.64

      10320

      20.37

      10890

      17.31

      Fig.5: Percentage reduction in modulus with time for tensile specimens

      Percentage of reduction in tensile modulus Vs Duration for aged and unaged Kevlar/Epoxy, Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy and Glass/Epoxy specimens

      The percentage in modulus is very high for pure Kevlar/Epoxy specimens which is due to the reason that Kevlar absorbs more moisture. The difference in percentage reduction of tensile modulus for aged Glass/Epoxy, Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy specimens are found to be almost same.

      Table 3: Percentage Reduction of Flexural modulus for aged and unaged Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy and Glass/Epoxy

      FLEXURAL MODULUS (MPa)

      Duration

      Hybrid

      % of Reduction

      Glass

      % of Reduction

      Un Aged

      11240

      0

      12460

      0

      1 month

      9505

      15.43594

      11470

      7.945425

      2 months

      9414

      16.24555

      10760

      13.64366

      3 months

      9232

      17.86477

      10320

      17.17496

      4 months

      8655

      22.99822

      9442

      24.22151

      5 months

      8274

      26.3879

      9344

      25.00803

      Fig.6: Percentage reduction in modulus with time for flexural specimens

      Percentage of reduction in Flexural modulus Vs Duration for aged and unaged Kevlar/Epoxy, Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy and Glass/Epoxy specimens

      The table 5.8 lists the percentage reducion in flexural modulus for Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy and Glass/Epoxy specimens immersed in sea water for a period from 1-5 months when compared with the tensile modulus of unaged Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy and Glass/Epoxy specimen.

      The percentage reduction in flexural modulus is higher for Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy specimens which is due to the fact Kevlar is relatively higher tensile, high impact strength but weaker in Compressive, flexural strength.

  4. EDAX RESULTS

Energy Dispersive X-ray Analysis (EDAX) is used to find out the chemical composition, net count, weight percentage, atom percentage and compound percentage. In this study the chemical composition, net count, weight percentage, atom percentage and compound percentage of un aged and aged Glass/Epoxy, Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy specimens for periods of two months and four months is being analysed. Effect of water absorption From that we inferred the absorption of the sea water in the immersed specimen data compared to the unaged data.

Fig.7: EDAX results for Glass/Epoxy unaged specimen

Table 4: the Element % for Glass/Epoxy unaged Specimen from EDAX test

Fig.8: EDAX results for Glass/Epoxy specimen 2 months aged in sea water

Elem ent

Net Counts

Net Counts Error

Weig ht %

Atom

%

Compo und %

C

7822

+/- 930

53.42

75.40

53.42

O

4540

+/- 390

16.95

17.80

16.95

Na

209

+/- 156

0.27

0.20

0.27

Mg

253

+/- 165

0.20

0.14

0.20

Al

355

+/- 183

0.30

0.19

0.30

Si

7183

+/- 474

6.19

3.73

6.19

Cl

668

+/- 159

0.92

0.51

0.92

Ca

198

+/- 120

0.50

0.21

0.50

Au

10399

+/- 834

21.27

1.83

21.27

Total

100

100

100

Elem ent

Net Counts

Net Counts Error

Weig ht %

Atom

%

Compo und %

C

7822

+/- 930

53.42

75.40

53.42

O

4540

+/- 390

16.95

17.80

16.95

Na

209

+/- 156

0.27

0.20

0.27

Mg

253

+/- 165

0.20

0.14

0.20

Al

355

+/- 183

0.30

0.19

0.30

Si

7183

+/- 474

6.19

3.73

6.19

Cl

668

+/- 159

0.92

0.51

0.92

Ca

198

+/- 120

0.50

0.21

0.50

Au

10399

+/- 834

21.27

1.83

21.27

Total

100

100

100

Table. 5: the Element % for Glass/Epoxy 2 months aged specimen in sea water from EDAX test

Element

Net Counts

Net Counts

Weight

%

Atom

%

Compo und %

C

11719

+/- 432

58.47

83.09

58.47

O

3574

+/- 222

11.86

12.65

11.86

Al

430

+/- 195

0.31

0.19

0.31

Si

3366

+/- 252

2.45

1.49

2.45

Ca

329

+/- 138

0.70

0.30

0.70

Au

15361

+/- 3r2 900

26.21

2.27

26.21

Total

100.00

100.00

100.00

Fig.9: EDAX results for glass/epoxy specimens 4 months aged in sea water

Table 6: the Element % for Glass/Epoxy 4 months aged specimen in sea water from EDAX test

Fig.10: EDAX results for Glass/Kevlar/epoxy un aged specimen

Table 7: the Element % for Hybrid un aged specimen from EDAX test

Element

Net Count s

Net Count s Error

Weigh t %

Atom

%

Compo und %

C

8519

+/- 981

49.83

75.39

49.83

O

4864

+/- 423

14.60

16.59

14.60

Na

446

+/- 183

0.46

0.37

0.46

Mg

221

+/- 189

0.14

0.10

0.14

Al

397

+/- 213

0.27

0.18

0.27

Si

9071

+/- 549

6.36

4.12

6.36

Cl

852

+/- 183

1.12

0.58

1.12

Ca

221

+/- 141

0.45

0.21

0.45

Au

16081

+/- 999

26.75

2.47

26.75

Total

100.00

100.00

100.00

Element

Net Counts

Net Counts Error

Weight

%

Atom

%

Compo und %

C

12374

+/- 441

63.10

84.09

63.10

O

3180

+/- 234

11.65

11.55

11.65

Mg

285

+/- 168

0.20

0.13

0.20

Al

436

+/- 183

0.33

0.20

0.33

Si

3092

+/- 393

2.43

1.38

2.43

Ca

267

+/- 123

0.60

0.24

0.60

Fe

225

+/- 123

3.12

0.89

3.12

Au

10125

+/- 504

18.56

1.51

18.56

Total

100.00

100.00

100.00

Element

Net Count s

Net Count s Error

Weigh t %

Atom

%

Compo und %

C

8519

+/- 981

49.83

75.39

49.83

O

4864

+/- 423

14.60

16.59

14.60

Na

446

+/- 183

0.46

0.37

0.46

Mg

221

+/- 189

0.14

0.10

0.14

Al

397

+/- 213

0.27

0.18

0.27

Si

9071

+/- 549

6.36

4.12

6.36

Cl

852

+/- 183

1.12

0.58

1.12

Ca

221

+/- 141

0.45

0.21

0.45

Au

16081

+/- 999

26.75

2.47

26.75

Total

100.00

100.00

100.00

Element

Net Counts

Net Counts Error

Weight

%

Atom

%

Compo und %

C

12374

+/- 441

63.10

84.09

63.10

O

3180

+/- 234

11.65

11.55

11.65

Mg

285

+/- 168

0.20

0.13

0.20

Al

436

+/- 183

0.33

0.20

0.33

Si

3092

+/- 393

2.43

1.38

2.43

Ca

267

+/- 123

0.60

0.24

0.60

Fe

225

+/- 123

3.12

0.89

3.12

Au

10125

+/- 504

18.56

1.51

18.56

Total

100.00

100.00

100.00

Fig.11: EDAX results for Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy 2 months

aged specimen in sea water

Table 8: Element % for Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy 2 months aged specimen from EDAX test

Fig.12: EDAX results for Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy 4 month aged specimen in sea water

Table 9: Element % for Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy 4 months aged specimen from EDAX test

Eleme nt

Net Count s

Net Counts Error

Weigh t %

Atom

%

Compoun d %

C

7760

+/-

927

45.72

75.94

45.72

O

4102

+/-

243

12.36

15.41

12.36

Na

762

+/-

351

0.81

0.70

0.81

Mg

451

+/-

210

0.29

0.24

0.29

Al

411

+/-

222

0.29

0.21

0.29

Si

6176

+/-

531

4.38

3.11

4.38

Cl

688

+/-

384

0.92

0.52

0.92

K

223

+/-

144

0.38

0.19

0.38

Ca

173

+/-

144

0.36

0.18

0.36

Au

20715

+/-1098

34.49

3.49

34.49

Total

100

100

100

Element

Net Counts

Net Counts Error

Weigh t %

Atom

%

Comp ound

%

C

6712

+/-

894

43.68

74.83

43.68

O

3775

+/-

399

11.94

15.36

11.94

Na

644

+/-

342

0.72

0.64

0.72

Mg

441

+/-

207

0.30

0.25

0.30

Si

7392

+/-

537

5.52

4.05

5.52

Cl

864

+/-

195

1.23

0.71

1.23

K

193

+/-

144

0.35

0.18

0.35

Ca

204

+/-

147

0.45

0.23

0.45

Au

20326

+/-1080

35.80

3.74

35.80

Total

100.00

100.00

100.00

Eleme nt

Net Count s

Net Counts Error

Weigh t %

Atom

%

Compoun d %

C

7760

+/-

927

45.72

75.94

45.72

O

4102

+/-

243

12.36

15.41

12.36

Na

762

+/-

351

0.81

0.70

0.81

Mg

451

+/-

210

0.29

0.24

0.29

Al

411

+/-

222

0.29

0.21

0.29

Si

6176

+/-

531

4.38

3.11

4.38

Cl

688

+/-

384

0.92

0.52

0.92

K

223

+/-

144

0.38

0.19

0.38

Ca

173

+/-

144

0.36

0.18

0.36

Au

20715

+/-1098

34.49

3.49

34.49

Total

100

100

100

Element

Net Counts

Net Counts Error

Weigh t %

Atom

%

Comp ound

%

C

6712

+/-

894

43.68

74.83

43.68

O

3775

+/-

399

11.94

15.36

11.94

Na

644

+/-

342

0.72

0.64

0.72

Mg

441

+/-

207

0.30

0.25

0.30

Si

7392

+/-

537

5.52

4.05

5.52

Cl

864

+/-

195

1.23

0.71

1.23

K

193

+/-

144

0.35

0.18

0.35

Ca

204

+/-

147

0.45

0.23

0.45

Au

20326

+/-1080

35.80

3.74

35.80

Total

100.00

100.00

100.00

From the EDAX results it was found that Na+ and Cl- , were not present in unaged specimens whereas for Glass/Epoxy specimens immersed in sea water for two months Na+ is 0.20 percentage by weight and Cl- is 0.92 percentage by weight and the percentage of Na+ has increased to 0.46 percentage by weight and Cl- 1.12 percentage by weight for 4 months aged specimens.

And the EDAX results it was found that Na+ and Cl- , were not present in unaged specimens whereas for Glass/Kevlar/Epoxy specimens immersed in sea water for two months Na+ is 0.81 percentage by weight and Cl- is 0.92 percentage by weight and the percentage of Na+ has increased to 0.72 percentage by weight and Cl- 1.23 percentage by weight for 4 months aged specimens.

CONCLUSSION

The effect of water absorption on the mechanical (tensile & flexural) properties of glass/epoxy, Kevlar/epoxy, glass/Kevlar/epoxy fibre reinforced polymer composites has been studied the immersion in sea water for the period of 5 months. The data presented in the present work show that the procedure adopted is suitable for environmental (sea water immersed) testing of composite materials. The environmental procedure introduces moisture into the material faster than the regular procedure. For many problems of practical interest, the conditions to be employed in the environmental tests can be determined from the simple charts obtained in this work. The investigation has revealed that the moisture absorption causes the degradation of strength and stiffness of the composites.

It shows the moisture uptake increase with Kevlar/epoxy composites than compared to glass/epoxy composites due to the aramid fibre. The water absorption pattern of these composites is found to follow Fickian behaviour. Water uptake behaviour is radically altered at higher duration due to significant moisture induced degradation. Exposure to moisture results in significant drops in tensile and flexural properties due to the degradation of the fibre matrix interface. The acoustic emission measurements reveal that moisture content plays a significant role in the behaviour of the material during the failure process. The SEM/EDAX results are used to validate the degradation and the absorption behaviour.

REFERENCES

  1. G.S.Springer, ed Environmental effects on composite material Vol 1,2 and 3 Lancaster PA., Technomic publishing company 1981,1984 and 1987

  2. R.Gopalan, R.M.G.V.K. Rao, M.V.V.Murthy and B.Dattaguru, Diffusion studies on advanced fibre hybrid composites, Journal of reinforced plastics and composites, Vol.5, January 1986, pp. 51 61.

  3. C.H.Shen and G.S.Springer, Moisture absorption and desorption of composite materials Journal of composite materials, Vol.10, January 1976, pp 2 20.

  4. R.Gopalan, B.R.Somashekar and Dattaguru, Environmental effects of fibre polymer composites, International journal of polymer degradation and stability, vol.24, 1989, pp.1 4.

  5. P.R.Cirscioli, W.I.Lee, D.G.Peterson, G.S.Springer and Jian Mao Tang Accelerated Environmental testing of composites Journal of composite materials, Vol.21 March 1989, pp. 225 243.

  6. Padmavathi Surathi, Vistasp M. Karbhari, hygrothermal effects on durability and moisture kinetics of fiber-reinforced polymer composites

  7. R.Gopalan, R.M.G.V.K. Rao, M.V.V.Murthy and B.Dattaguru, Diffusion studies on advanced fibre hybrid composites, Journal of reinforced plastics and composites, Vol.5, January 1986, pp. 51 61.

  8. Catherine A. Wood, Walter L. Bradley.Determination of the effect of seawater on the interfacial strength of an interlayer E- glass/graphite/epoxy composite, Composites Science and Technology, Volume 57, Issue 8, 1997, Pages 1033-1043

  9. S.K. Rege, S.C. Lakkad.Effect of salt water on mechanical properties of fibre reinforced plastic,s Fibre Science and Technology, Volume 19, Issue 4, 1983, Pages 317-324

  10. Krystyna Imieliska, Laurent Guillaumat.The effect of water immersion ageing on low-velocity impact behaviour of woven aramidglass fibre/epoxy composites Composites Science and Technology, Volume 64, Issues 13-14, October 2004, Pages 2271- 2278

  11. M. Akay, S. Kong Ah Mud & A. Stanley Influence Of Moisture On The Thermal And Mechanical Properties Of Autoclaved And Oven-Cured Kevlar- 49/Epoxy Laminates School of Electrical and Mechanical Engineering, University of Ulster at Jordan town, Newtownabbey composite science and technology

Leave a Reply