Energy Conservation Techniques Adapted for Conservation of Electrical Energy in Grid Station

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV3IS090135

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Energy Conservation Techniques Adapted for Conservation of Electrical Energy in Grid Station

Loveneesh Talwar Assistant Professor

Dept. of Electrical Engineering YCET, Jammu, India

Dinesh Gupta Assistant Professor

Dept. of Electronics & Communication Engineering YCET, Jammu, India

AbstractAn attempt has been made in this paper to reveal the energy conservation techniques adapting for conservation of energy in grid station. The most important law governing the transfer of energy from one to the other form is the law of conservation of energy which states that energy can neither be created nor be destroyed; however, it can be converted from one form to another form. Energy auditing is not an exact science, but a number of opportunities are available for improving the accuracy of the recommendations. I began by discussing how to perform energy and demand balance. This balance is an important step in doing an energy use analysis because it provides a check on the accuracy of some of the assumptions necessary to calculate savings potential. I did energy audit of control room and residential quarters of 220/132/33 KV Grid Station Complex. There were 1 control room and 12 residential quarters having 48 fluorescent tube lamps (FTL), 51 incandescent lamps, 63 high pressure mercury vapour lamps (HPMV), 11 computers with 3 ACs. It was found that the electric fixtures installed in the control room and residential quarters are not energy efficient. Thus there is scope of audit in the control room and residential quarters. I took the half hourly readings of current drawn by various equipments manually by using clamp meter.

KeywordsFluorescent tube lamps, air conditioners, energy conservation measures, compact fluorescent lamp, kilovolt, kilowatt, cathode ray tube, liquid crystal diode.

  1. INTRODUCTION

    The most important law governing the transfer of energy from one to the other form is the law of conservation of energy which states that energy can neither be created nor be destroyed; however, it can be converted from one form to another form. It also states that total amount of energy in an isolated system remains constant [1]. Energy conservation is the practice of decreasing the quantity of energy used while achieving a similar output at the end for use [2], [3]. On a larger scale, energy conservation is an element of energy policy [4]. Cheap and sub standard gadgets consume more power as compared to expensive standard gadgets and prove to be costlier on a long run [5-13]. Consideration should be given to the Life cycle cost rather than capital cost while purchasing any gadget. It should always be kept in mind that electricity saved is money saved. The area chosen for the energy conversion opportunities is 220/132/33KV grid station situated at village Barn which is 25Kms from Jammu as shown in figure 1 and figure 2. The Grid station Barn was inaugurated in the year 2005. Today, this Grid Station has a

    capacity to supply 320MVA power to the Jammu province. As on date it is being receiving power from Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd at Grid Station Kishenpur at 220KV level. Further it is step down from 220KV to 132KV and this 132KV is transmitted to Jammu at Grid Station Canal. On the other hand, again it is Step down from 132KV to 33KV which is again supplied to Purkhoo, Akhnoor, Bhalwal area of Jammu Province.

    Fig. 1 Switch yard of Barn Grid Station

    In this energy Audit I adopt energy conservation techniques in control room and residential quarters of 220/132/33KV Grid Station complex at Barn, Jammu. There were 1 Control room and 12 Residential Quarters having 48 FTL having wattage 55W, 51 Incandescent lamps having wattage 100W, and 63 High pressure mercury vapour lamps having wattage 250W, 11 Computers having wattage 40W with 3 ACs. It was found that the electric fixtures installed in the control room and residential quarters are not energy efficient. Thus there is scope of audit in the control room and residential quarters. I took the half hourly readings of current drawn by various equipments manually by using clamp meter.

    Fig. 2 Control room of Barn Grid Station

  2. CASE STUDY

    I suggested four energy conservation measures:

    • Replacing of incandescent lamps with compact fluorescent lamps (CFL).

    • Replacement of 40watts T12 FTL having 15watts magnetic ballast with 36watts T8 FTL having 4watts electronic ballast.

    • Replacement of high pressure mercury vapour lamps (HPMV) with high pressure sodium vapour lamps

      There are 51 Incandescent lamps in the grid station complex, which are recommended for replacement with 20watts CFL. The economics of such a replacement is worked out as under: Present Installed Wattage = Watts × Lamps

      =100 watts × 51 = 5.10 KW

      Proposed Installation wattage = 20 watts × 51 = 1.02 KW Reduced Installation wattage = 5.10 1.02 = 4.08 KW

      Annual savings in energy @10 hours per day and 365 days of operation with an electricity rate of Rs.4 per KWhr

      = 365 × 10 × 4.08 × 4 = Rs.59568/-

      Investment required including cost of CFLs

      = 120 × 51 = Rs.6200/-

      Payback Period = (Rs.6200 / Rs.59568) × 365 days

      = 38 Days (< 1 Year)

      Existing 51 Incandescent lamps energy consumption

      =51×100 × 10 × 365 = 18615000Wh

      =18615KWh

      Proposed 51 CFLs energy consumption

      =51×20 × 10 × 365 = 3723000Wh

      =3723KWh

      The calculated values of energy saving using ECM I as shown in figure 3.

      ECM I

      (HPSV).

    • Replacement of existing Cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor with Liquid crystal diode (LCD) Monitor.

    Under first measure has very very small investment with the payback period of 1 month. Second one also has small initial investment with payback period less than one year. Third one has payback period of one year. Fourth one has large

    20000

    Energy (Kwh)

    15000

    10000

    5000

    0

    18615

    3723

    initial investment with payback period of 3.65 years.

    ECM 1: Replacing of Incandescent Lamps with Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFL)

    TABLE I. EXISTING INCANDESCENT LAMPS AND PROPOSED CFL

    S. No

    Existing Incandescent

    Lamps

    Proposed CFL

    No. of Fixtures

    1

    100watts

    20watts

    51

    Energy Saving achieved by replacing 100watts Incandescent Lamps with 20watts CFLs is given as under:

    The use of 20watts CFLs offers the same lumen output as compared to a 100watts Incandescent Lamps.

    Efficacy of Incandescent lamps is about 12 lumens/watt. Hence, 100 × 12 = 1200 lumens/watt

    Efficacy of CFLs is about 60 lumens/watt Hence, 60 × 20 = 1200 lumens/watt

    Monetary savings

    Monetary savings per year = Rs.59568

    Investment Required = Rs.6200

    Pay Back period = 38 Days (< 1 Year) Calculations for Energy Conservation Measures – I

    Existing Proposed

    Consumption per year

    Fig. 3 Detail of energy saving using ECM-1

    ECM 2: Replacement of 40watts T12 FTL having 15watts Magnetic Ballast with 36watts T8 FTL having 4watts Electronic Ballast.

    TABLE II. EXISTING 40 WATTS T12 FTL WITH 15 WATTS MAGNETIC BALLAST AND PROPOSED 36 WATTS T8 FTL HAVING 4 WATTS ELECTRONIC BALLAST

    1

    S. No

    Existing 40watts T12 FTL with 15watts Magnetic Ballast

    Proposed 36watts T8 FTL having 4watts Electronic Ballast

    No. of Fixtures

    40 + 15 = 55watts

    36 + 4 = 40watts

    48

    Energy saving achieved by replacing 40watts T12 FTL with 36watts T8 FTL is given below:

    The use of 36watts T8 FTL offers the same lumen output as compared with 40watts T12 FTL.

    Monetary savings

    Unit Monetary saving per year = Rs.10512 Investment Required = Rs.9600

    Pay Back period = 333 Days (< 1 Year)

    Calculations for Energy Conservation Measures – II

    There are 48, 40watts T12 FTL with 15watts magnetic ballast used for illumination in residential colony and control room inside the grid station complex which are recommended for replacement with 36watts T8 FTL with 4watts electronic ballast. The economics of such a replacement is worked out as under:

    Present Installed Wattage = 55 watts × 48 = 2.64 KW Proposed Installation wattage = 40 watts × 48 = 1.92 KW Reduced Installation wattage = 2.64 1.92 = 0.72 KW

    Annual savings in energy @10 hours per day and 365 days of operation with an electricity rate of Rs.4 per Kwhr

    = 365 × 10 × 0.72 × 4 = Rs.10512/-

    Investment required = 200 × 48 = Rs.9600/- Payback period = (Rs.9600/Rs.10512) × 365

    = 333 Days (< 1 Year) Existing 48 T12 FTL energy consumption

    =48×55 × 10 × 365 = 9636000Wh

    =9636KWh

    Proposed 48 T8 FTL energy consumption

    =48×40 × 10 × 365 = 2628000Wh

    =2628KWh

    The calculated values of energy saving using ECM II as shown in figure 4.

    ECM II

    Lamp is warm white and their colour rendering ranges from poor to fairly good.

    Monetary savings

    Monetary savings per year = Rs.114975 Investment Required = Rs.126000

    Pay Back period = 440 Days (> 1 Year)

    Calculations for Energy Conservation Measures III

    There are 63 HPMV Lamps used for Street Light and illumination in switch yard inside the Grid Station Complex which are recommended for replacement with 125watts HPSV lamps. The economics of such a replacement is worked out as under:

    Present Installed Wattage = 250 watts × 63 = 15.75 KW Proposed Installation wattage = 125 watts × 63 = 7.875 KW Reduced Installation wattage = 15.75 7.875 = 7.875 KW Annual savings in energy @10 hours per day and 365 days of operation with an electricity rate of Rs.4 per KWhr

    = 365 × 10 × 7.875 × 4 = Rs.114975/-

    Investment required including cost of lamp, luminaries and ballast = 2000 × 63 = Rs.126000/-

    Payback Period = (Rs.138600 / Rs.114975) × 365 days

    = 440 Days (> 1 Year) Existing 63 HPMV energy consumption

    =63×250 × 10 × 365 = 57487500Wh

    =57487.5KWh

    Proposed 63 HPSV energy consumption

    =63×125 × 10 × 365 = 28743750Wh

    Energy (Kwh)

    12000

    10000

    8000

    6000

    4000

    2000

    0

    9636

    2628

    =28743.75KWh

    The calculated values of energy saving using ECM III as shown in figure 5.

    ECM III

    Existing Proposed

    Consumption per year

    Fig. 4 Detail of energy saving using ECM-II

    ECM 3: Replacement of High Pressure Mercury Vapour

    80000

    Energy (Kwh)

    60000

    40000

    20000

    0

    57487.5

    28743.75

    Lamps with High Pressure Sodium Vapour Lamps

    TABLE III. EXISTING HPMV LAMPS AND PROPOSED HPSV LAMPS

    S. No

    Existing HPMV Lamps

    Proposed HPSV Lamps

    No. of Fixtures

    1

    250Watts, HPMV

    125Watts, HPSV

    63

    Energy Saving achieved by replacing 250 watts HPMV Lamps with 125watts HPSV Lamps is given below:

    The use of 125watts HPSV Lamp offers the same lumen output as compared with a 250watts HPMV Lamp.

    HPMV Lamps provide about 50 lumens/watt. Hence, 250 × 50 = 12500 lumens/watt

    HPSV Lamps provide about 90 150 lumens/watt Hence, 125 × 120 = 15000 lumens/watt

    Also HPSV lamps are reliable and have long service life as compared to HPMV Lamp. colour of light from a HPSV

    Existing Proposed

    Consumption per year

    Fig. 5 Detail of energy saving using ECM-III

    ECM 4: Replacement of CRT Monitors by LCDs

    There are 10 pc in the control room with CRT monitor & if we replace them by LCDs then there will be following benefits:

    1. The space occupied will be less.

    2. The amperes drawn will be less.

    3. The load on ac will be less.

    4. Smaller rating UPS can be used.

    5. Reduction in maximum demand.

    6. Smaller ac requirement.

    (note: by the use of LCD in place of CRT the area required is reduced by 1sq feet & the cost of construction of 1 sq feet is about 2000.Thus for 10 we can save 20,000.as building is

    already constructed and we cant do anything thus we are not putting it in our calculations)

    ECM IV

    Monetary savings

    Monetary saving per year = Rs.15032.16

    Investment Required = Rs.55000

    Pay Back period = 1332 Days (> 3 Years)

    Calculations for Energy Conservation Measures IV

    5000

    4000

    3000

    2000

    1000

    0

    3854.4

    1349.04

    Energy (Kwh)

    Total Load of CRT: 11 No × 40 watt = 0.44 KW Annual energy consumed by the installed load of CRT

    = 0.44 KW × 24 hrs × 365 days = 3854.40

    Existing Proposed

    Consumption Per Year

    KWhr

    Annual charges of energy consumed by the installed load of CRT = 3854.40 KWhr × Rs.4/ KWhr = Rs.15417.60/-

    If we replace 14watt LCD, then

    Total Installed Load of LCD: 11 No × 14 watt = 0.154 KW Annual energy consumed by the installed load of LCD

    = 0.154 KW × 24 hrs × 365 days

    = 1349.04 KWhr

    Annual charges of energy consumed by the installed load of LCD = 1349.04 KWhr × Rs.4/ KWhr

    = Rs.5396.16/-

    Annual energy savings = 3854.40 1349.04 = 2505.36 KWhr Assume cost of LCD = Rs.5000/-

    Cost of replacement of LCD = Rs.5000/- × 11 No = Rs55000/-

    Annual monetary savings = Rs. 15417.60 Rs.5396.16

    = Rs.10021.44/-

    We are saving 2505.36 KWhr per year = 2505360Whr

    = 8543277.60 Btu (1Wh=3.41Btu)

    Typical air conditioner has performance factor (k) = 2. Thus, it would require 0.5 Btu of energy to remove 1 Btu. Therefore, no. of Btu required removing 8543277.60 Btu of heat

    = 8543277.60 / 2

    = 4271638.80 Btu

    = 1252.68 KWhr

    Cost per unit = Rs.4/-

    Monetary saving per year = 4 ×1252.68 = Rs.5010.72

    Pay Back Period = (Cost of replacement) / (Annual savings)

    = [(Rs. 55000) / (Rs. 10021.44 + Rs.5010.72)] × 365 days

    = 1332 Days (> 3 Years)

    Existing 11 CRT energy consumption

    =11×40 × 24 × 365 = 3854400Wh

    =3854.4KWh

    Proposed 11 LCD energy consumption

    =11×14 × 24 × 365 = 1349040Wh

    =1349.04KWh

    The calculated values of energy saving using ECM IV as shown in figure 6.

    Fig. 6 Detail of energy saving using ECM-IV

  3. CONSERVATION OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY BY ADAPTING SIMPLE MEAURES

    1. Reducing the light sources ON Time which means improving lighting control and educating users to Turn-OFF lights when not required.

    2. Using day lighting, which reduces energy consumption by replacing electric lights with natural light.

    3. Ensuring simple maintenance that preserves illumination and light quality, and allows lower initial illumination level.

    4. Installing LDR based automatic illumination control which automatically turns-OFF the light during day time and turns-ON the light during night.

    5. Ensure simple maintenance that gives better light quality.

  4. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CONSERVATION OF

    ELECTRICAL ENERGY IN GRID STATION

    If we go for ECM 1 & ECM 2

    As in ECM1 and ECM2 there is minimum initial investment with payback period less than one year. Thus we can go for them without much thought

    Total no of uits which we can save = 4.08 KW + 0.72 KW

    =4.80 KW

    Cost per unit = Rs.4.00/-

    Monetary saving per day = (Rs.4 × 4.80 KW) × 10 hrs

    = Rs.192/-

    Monetary saving per year = Rs.192 × 365 = Rs.70080/-

    If we go for ECM 3 and ECM 4

    Under ECM 3 we have suggested to replace 250Watts High pressure mercury vapour lamps with 125Watts High pressure sodium vapour lamps. In this there is large initial investment required and the Payback period is 440 Days (i.e. > 1 Year). Similarly under ECM 4 we have suggested to replace Computers CRT with LCD. In this, again the initial investment required is large and the Payback period is 1332 Days (i.e. > 3 Years). Thus it depends whether we want to go for it or not. But we can save a lot of energy if we adopt this measure.

    Cost per unit = Rs.4.00 Monetary saving per year

    = Rs. 10021.44 + Rs.5010.72 + Rs.114975 = Rs.130006/-

    TABLE IV PRIORITY WISE RECOMMENDATIONS

    conservations which are discussed above we can save the energy up to greater extent because in todays scenario the generation of electrical energy is low but demand or consumption is very high. Under first measure has very very small investment with the payback period of 1 month. Second one also has small initial investment with payback period less than one year. Third one has Payback period of one year. Fourth one has large initial investment with payback period of

      1. years

        Recommendations

        Initial Cost

        Saving in KWh

        (per year)

        Saving in Tariff (Rs)

        Pay Back Period

        Replacing of Incandescent Lamps with Compact

        Fluorescent Lamps (CFL)

        Rs.6200

        14892

        Rs.59568

        38 Days

        (< 1

        Year)

        Replacement of 40 watts T12 FTL having 15 watts Magnetic Ballast with 36 watts T8 FTL having 4 watts Electronic

        Ballast

        Rs.9600

        2628

        Rs.10512

        333

        Days (< 1

        Year)

        Replacement of High Pressure Mercury Vapour Lamps with High

        Pressure Sodium Vapour Lamps

        Rs.126000

        28743.75

        Rs.11497 5

        440

        Days (> 1

        Year)

        Replacement of

        existing CRT

        Rs.55000

        3758.04

        Rs.15032

        1332

        monitor with LCD

        .16

        Days

        Monitor

        (> 3

        Year)

        ACKNOWLEDGMENT

        The authors would like to express a deep sense of gratitude and thanks to Asstt. Executive Engineer Sub Division Barn Jammu for extending his knowledge and help in establishing the experimental setup and conducting the investigations. The authors would also like to express sincere gratitude and appreciation to Er. Abhinav Sharma for his technical support and valuable ideas. His learned advice, guidance and constant encouragement have helped me to complete this work successfully.

        The percentage wise distribution of proposed energy by adapting all the four ECMs is shown in figure.7

        ECM I ECM II ECM III

        ECM IV

        Distribution of Connected Load by End Use

        REFERENCES

        1. B S. Kanthan and S. Srinivas, Minimization of Distribution losses for Domestic appliances, A case study, Electrical India, vol. 53, no. 9, Sept. 2013, pp. 68.

        2. L.C. Witte, P.S. Schmidt and D.R. Brown, Industrial Energy Management and Utilisation, Hemisphere Publication, Washington, 1988.

        3. V. Thiyagarajan and V. Sekar, Modeling of photovoltaic systems for power grid equipped houses as partial lighting system, International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology, vol. 1, no. 1, Dec. 2012, pp. 171-175.

        4. W.C. Turner and S. Doty, Energy Management Handbook, edition 6th, Fairmont Press, USA, 2007.

        5. C. Beggs, Energy Management Supply and conservation, edition 2nd, Killington Oxford, Elsevier Ltd, 2009.

        6. H. Elaydi, I. Ibrik and E. koundary, Conservation and management of electrical energy in Gaza strip using low cost investment, International Journal of Engineering Research and Application, vol. 2, no. 4, April 2014, July-August 2012, pp. 5298-5303.

        7. M. k. J Pnchal, Dr. V. V. Dwivedi and R. Aparnathi, The Case study of energy conservation and audit in industry sector, International

          64%

          4% 11%

          21%

          Journal of Engineering and Computer Sciences, vol. 3, no. 4, 2014, pp. 5298-5303.

        8. B. P. Rath and Prof. J. Akhter, Understanding carbon credit prospectus for electricity generation in India, Electrical India, vol. 52, no. 5, 2012, pp. 76.

        9. H. K. Agarwal, Smart Grid Initiative in India and supremes Experience in Electrical India, vol. 53, no. 9, Sept. 2013, pp. 78

        10. Typical lumen outputs and energy costs for outdoor lighting,www.nofs.navy.mil/about_NoFs/staff/cbl/lumentab.html

          Fig. 7 Distribution of connected load by end use

  5. CONCLUSION

Energy conservation is the practice of decreasing the quantity of energy used while achieving a similar output at the end for use. On a larger scale, energy conservation is an element of energy policy. Cheap and sub standard gadgets consume more power as compared to expensive standard gadgets and prove to be costlier on a long run. Consideration should be given to the life Cycle cost rather than capital cost while purchasing any gadget. It should always be kept in mind that electricity saved is money saved. The area chosen for the energy conversion opportunities is 220/132/33 KV Grid Station situated at Village Barn. By adapting four energy

      1. Official website of the Bureau of Energy Efficiency, Govt. of India, www.beeindia.nic.in

      2. Detailed information and case studies on energy audits, www.energymanagertraining.com

      3. Website of the Ministry of Power, http://powermin.nic.in

/distribution/energy _audit

Er. Loveneesh Talwar (Assistant Professor) received his B.E Degree in Electrical Engineering from MBS College of engineering and technology, University of Jammu, India and also received M. Tech. Degree in Energy Management from Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University,

Kakrayal, Katra, Jammu, J&k, India. He worked as academic arrangement lecturer in the Department of Electrical Engineering at GCET Jammu for next one and half year and also worked as Head of Department in the department of Electrical Engineering at I.E.C.S Polytechnic, Jammu for next Five years. Presently working as Assistant Professor in Electrical Department, Yogananda College of Engineering & Technology, Jammu. He has attended various short termed courses conducted by different organizations like NITTTR Chandigarh, Dale Carnegie & Associates, Inc. Trainer and Wipro, Usha Automation Panchkula on the topics PLC and its Applications, Induction Training Program through ICT, Environmental science & Engineering through ICT, High Impact Teaching Skills, Cloud Computing ,Virtual Instrumentation, Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA). He has also achieved Excellent Performance by adapting highest standards in Teaching Learning Process and get appraisal letter from the Principal I.E.C.S Polytechnic regarding teacher performance given by feedback of students.

Er. Dinesh Gupta (Assistant Professor) received his M. Tech. Degree in Electronics & Communication from Lovely Professional University Punjab, India and AMIE in Electronics & Communication Engineering. Presently he is doing Phd from OPJS University. He worked as Head of Department in

departent of Electronics & Communication at I.E.C.S Polytechnic for next Eighteen years and presently working as Assistant Professor, Yogananda College of Engineering & Technology, Jammu. He has attended various short termed courses conducted by different organizations like NITTTR Chandigarh on the topics PLC and its Applications, Induction training program through ICT, Environmental science & Engineering through ICT, High Impact teaching skills, maintenance & servicing of various electronic equipments.

Leave a Reply