Enhancement of Interfacial Transition Zone (Itz) by using Chemical Additives

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV12IS100093

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

Text Only Version

Enhancement of Interfacial Transition Zone (Itz) by using Chemical Additives

Sukruth N

Department of Civil

JSS Science and Technology University,

Mysuru, Karnataka, India

  1. Pavan Kumar

    Department of Civil,

    JSS Science and Technology University, Mysuru, Karnataka, India

    Prof. Mahendra Kumar HM Assistant Professor,

    Department of Civil,

    JSS Science and Technology University, Mysuru, Karnataka, India

    Abstract Interfacial Transition Zone (ITZ) enhancement is a vital process aimed at augmenting the mechanical and physical attributes of composite materials through targeted modifications of the ITZ. Various techniques, including the utilization of additives, surface coatings, specialized treatments, and refined mixing procedures, are employed to fortify the ITZ. The objective is to facilitate superior bonding among the components of concrete.

    Furthermore, comprehensive tests are conducted to furnish essential data pertaining to the concrete's strength, stiffness, and toughness. This data plays a pivotal role in the design and evaluation of structural enhancements for the concrete. Analyzing the behavior of concrete under diverse loading conditions is imperative for comprehending the failure process in concrete. It also aids in devising strategies to forestall failure. Moreover, a range of tests is utilized to monitor the quality of concrete production, ensuring it adheres to required specifications.

    The use of Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) stands out as an exceptionally potent tool for scrutinizing the microstructure, particularly in the context of ITZ post-failure. SEM allows for the high-resolution visualization of the internal structure of concrete, magnifying details up to 60µ. This technique furnishes invaluable insights, enriching our understanding of concrete at a profound level.

    In conclusion, the Interfacial Transition Zone represents a critical region characterized by a gradual shift in material properties. A thorough comprehension of ITZ holds paramount importance in advancing the durability and performance of concrete structures. It also serves as a cornerstone for the development of innovative materials and construction methodologies.

    1. INTRODUCTION

      Concrete, hailed as the bedrock of modern construction, stands as humanity's unparalleled and versatile building material. Its peak performance relies on the artful balance of meticulous proportions, thorough mixing for seamless cohesion, precise placement, and efficient compaction. Furthermore, concrete attains its desired properties through proper curing, maintaining an enduring internal moisture level for continuous hydration. Early-stage curing involves not only the application of water but also the creation of conditions conducive to sustained hydration within the matrix. It's noteworthy that the standard water content in concrete mixes typically suffices for complete cement hydration.

      The Interfacial-Transition-Zone (ITZ) in concrete designates the pivotal realm between aggregate particles and the cement paste. This zone fundamentally shapes the efficacy and

      longevity of concrete structures. Concrete, a fusion of coarse aggregates like gravel or crushed stone, and a cementitious paste composed of cement, water, and additives, gives rise to the ITZ where the cement paste interfaces with the aggregate material. It stands distinct due to its unique composition and properties, setting it apart from both the aggregate and cement adhesive. This region is characterized by a higher water-to-cement ratio, augmented porosity, and diminished strength compared to the bulk cement paste. These distinctions arise from factors such as incomplete hydration of cement particles, the presence of air voids, and the absence of direct bonding between paste and aggregates. To counteract the detrimental effects of the ITZ, an array of measures can be deployed. These encompass refining concrete mix design, integrating mineral additives, incorporating chemical admixtures, and ensuring thorough consolidation during construction. These strategies aim to fortify the bond strength between aggregate and cement paste, reduce porosity, and elevate the overall quality of the ITZ.

      The fatigue strength of concrete emerges as a pivotal parameter dictating its ability to withstand repeated cyclic loading without incurring substantial damage or failure. This consideration assumes paramount importance in the design and assessment of concrete structures subjected to dynamic or fluctuating loads over time. Concrete's inherently brittle nature renders it prone to developing microcracks under cyclic loading, which can progress into more substantial macrocracks. In this study, a groundbreaking approach has been adopted, introducing glass fibers into the material matrix of concrete to augment its fatigue strength. This innovation seeks to bolster the material against the rigors of cyclic loading, ultimately enhancing the longevity and reliability of the concrete structure. This pioneering advancement holds immense promise for applications in high-stress environments such as bridges, highways, and industrial structures, heralding a new era in concrete technology and the construction industry as a whole.

    2. OBJECTIVES The significant objectives of the work are:

      • Strengthen ITZ in concrete through the application of Epoxy and SBR compounds.

      • Reduce ITZ porosity to enhance aggregate bonding and structural integrity.

      • Incorporate SBR and Epoxy with fibers to augment fatigue resistance.

      • Improve ITZ's resistance against cracking and damage for extended structure lifespan.

      • Utilize SEM for in-depth microscopic analysis of the Interfacial-Transition-Zone.

      • Assess long-term durability and performance under varying environmental conditions.

      • Evaluate economic and environmental feasibility of composite additives in concrete mix design.

    3. METHODOLOGY

      The general block diagram of the Experiment fig(1).

      Fig .1: Methodology of Experiment

      The flowchart you have described outlines the process of making a concrete block. Below is a detailed description of each step for your report:

      1. Collection of Literature Survey:

        • This is the initial step in the process, where a comprehensive review of existing literature is conducted. It involves studying research papers, industry standards, and best practices related to concrete block production. This step helps in understanding the latest advancements and ensuring that the concrete block production process adheres to relevant standards.

      2. Collection of Materials:

        • After gathering information from the literature survey, the next step is to collect the necessary materials for making concrete blocks. This includes cement, aggregates, water, and any additional materials required for specific block types.

      3. Transition Zone Layer:

        • The transition zone layer is a critical part of concrete production. It refers to the region where the aggregate particles come into contact with the cement paste. Ensuring a proper transition zone is essential for the structural integrity and durability of the concrete block.

          4.Mixing:

        • In this stage, the collected materials are combined in specific proportions. The mixing process involves blending cement, aggregates, and water to form a homogenous mixture. The quality of mixing impacts the strength and consistency of the concrete.

      1. Aggregate Coating Material:

        • Certain types of concrete blocks may require the application of aggregate coating materials to enhance their appearance or provide specific functional properties. This step involves the addition of coatings as needed.

      2. Concrete Mix Design:

        • Concrete mix design is a crucial step where the exact proportions of each material are determined. It's essential to

          achieve the desired strength, workability, and durability of the concrete block. The mix design takes into account factors like aggregate size, water-cement ratio, and any additives.

      3. Casting of Concrete:

        • Once the mix design is finalized, the concrete is cast into molds. The molds are typically in the shape and size of the desired concrete blocks. During this step, it's important to ensure proper compaction to eliminate air voids and achieve structural integrity.

      4. Curing:

        • After casting, the concrete blocks need to undergo a curing process. Curing involves providing the right conditions of temperature and humidity to ensure proper hydration of the cement. This step is crucial for the development of strength and durability in the blocks.

      5. Testing:

        • Quality control is paramount in concrete block production. Testing involves assessing the properties of the concrete blocks, such as compressive strength, density, and moisture content. This step ensures that the blocks meet the required standards and specifications.

          10.Block:

        • The final step in the process is the production of the concrete block itself. This is the result of all the preceding stages, and the quality and characteristics of the block are determined by the precision and care taken in each of the earlier steps

    4. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS

The tests are carried on concrete specimens with a (water-cement) WC ratio of 0.45. The tests were conducted as per the standard specifications. The tests outputs are presented in this lesson and discussed with suitable graphical representation. Experimental results on concrete have shown that the compressive strength, tensile strength, flexural strength, and durability of concrete could be affected by a number of factors, including the design mix, in the curing time, and the age of the concrete.

COMPRESSIVE STRESS VALUES

MIX

3 DAYS

7 DAYS

28 DAYS

CONVENTIONAL

20

31

44.5

21

31.6

45.2

20.5

32.2

44.9

EPOXY

14.6

27.9

49.2

14.4

28.2

50.3

14.8

27

49.8

SBR

15.2

24.5

37.5

16.5

24.5

38

15.8

30

37

EPOXY WITH FIBER

14.25

26

47.5

14.0

26.5

47

15.4

26.8

48

SBR WITH FIBER

14.2

28.8

35.5

14.0

29.4

36.3

15.5

28.2

34.4

Table(1): Compression test values

SL NO

LOAD

DIV

STRAIN

STRESS

1

50000

0.15

0.00000

2.83

2

100000

5

0.00003

5.66

3

150000

9.5

0.00006

8.49

4

200000

15.5

0.00010

11.32

5

250000

21

0.00014

14.15

6

300000

26

0.00017

16.98

7

350000

31

0.00021

19.81

8

400000

36

0.00024

22.64

9

450000

43

0.00029

25.46

10

500000

49

0.00033

28.29

11

550000

57

0.00038

31.12

12

590000

125

0.00083

33.39

Fig .2: Compressive strength of concrete graph

LOAD

DIV

STRAIN

STRESS

50000

2

1.33E-05

2.829423

100000

5

3.33E-05

5.658845

150000

9

6.00E-05

8.488268

200000

14

9.33E-05

11.31769

250000

18

1.20E-04

14.14711

300000

24

1.60E-04

16.97654

350000

30

2.00E-04

19.80596

400000

36

2.40E-04

22.63538

450000

43

2.87E-04

25.4648

500000

50

3.33E-04

28.29423

550000

58

3.87E-04

31.12365

556000

65

4.33E-04

31.46318

Table (3): Stress vs Strain curve values (epoxy)

Table (2): Stress vs Strain curve values(conventional)

Fig .3: Compressive strength of concrete graph

Fig .4: stress vs strain curve

LOAD

DIV

STRAIN

STRESS

50000

1

6.67E-06

2.829423

100000

3

2.00E-05

5.658845

150000

6

4.00E-05

8.488268

200000

11

7.33E-05

11.31769

250000

17

1.13E-04

14.14711

300000

26

1.73E-04

16.97654

350000

30

2.00E-04

19.80596

400000

39

2.60E-04

22.63538

Table (4): Stress vs Strain curve values (SBR)

NO. of Cycles

Load

V1

V2

Stress

0

511.2

0.053

-0.002

0.05112

2000

280.8

0.144

0.062

0.02808

4000

278.8

0.2

0.077

0.02788

6000

275.7

0.241

0.067

0.02757

8000

274.7

0.282

0.087

0.02747

10000

52.4

0.287

0.067

0.02737

12000

276.7

0.297

0.077

0.02767

14000

277.8

0.323

0.092

0.02778

16000

272.7

0.307

0.097

0.02727

18000

274.7

0.313

0.087

0.02747

20000

269.6

0.302

0.072

0.02696

22000

281.8

0.313

0.072

0.02818

22000

281.8

0.313

0.072

0.02818

24000

266.5

0.307

0.067

0.02665

26000

271.6

0.343

0.067

0.02716

28000

271.6

0.338

0.087

0.02716

30000

273.7

0.353

0.087

0.02737

32000

271.6

0.338

0.077

0.02716

34000

272.7

0.348

0.092

0.02727

36000

271.6

0.338

0.082

0.02716

38000

269.6

0.343

0.077

0.02696

40000

273.7

0.343

0.092

0.02737

42000

272.7

0.343

0.077

0.02727

44000

270.6

0.323

0.077

0.02706

46000

270.6

0.333

0.072

0.02706

48000

272.7

0.338

0.087

0.02727

50000

270.6

0.333

0.082

0.02706

52000

277.8

0.343

0.087

0.02778

52945

857.9

0.358

0.161

0.08579

Fig .5: stress vs strain curve (SBR)

SPLIT TENSILE TEST

Mix

Split tensile strength (N/mm)

28days

CONVENTIONAL

3.5

EPOXY

3.95

SBR

3.26

Table (5): Split tensile Strength of cylinders.

FLEXURE TEST

Mix

Flexural strength (N/mm)

Conventional

7

Epoxy

9

SBR

7.8

Epoxy with Fiber

8.3

SBR with Fiber

6

Table (7): Fatigue test of beams at 28 days

Table (6): Flexure test of beams at 28 days

Fig .6: Fatigue test of beams at 28 days

No.cycle s

load

v1

v2

load

stress

505

669.3

0

0.077

669300

66.93

4595

668.3

0.015

0.097

668300

66.83

10790

711.1

0.021

0.102

711100

71.11

12890

669.3

0.015

0.097

669300

66.93

19785

796.7

0.015

0.122

796700

79.67

22805

781.4

0.015

0.112

781400

78.14

27295

785.5

0.026

0.132

785500

78.55

28265

760

0.015

0.132

760000

76

32880

809

0.021

0.142

809000

80.9

39230

846.7

-0.005

0.132

846700

84.67

41495

816.1

0.026

0.146

816100

81.61

47505

1006.8

0.01

0.161

100680

0

100.68

51190

1019

0.01

0.161

101900

0

101.9

51295

641.8

-0.005

2.069

641800

64.18

Table (8): Fatigue test of beams at 28 days

Fig .7: Fatigue test of beams at 28 days

SCANNING ELECRON MICROSCOPE ANALYSIS

Scanning Electron Microscopic images of conventional concrete

International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology

ISSN: 2278-0181

Vol. 12 Issue 10, October-2023

RESULTS

  • A typical concrete mixture comprises coarse and fine aggregate, Portland cement, water, and an admixture.

  • An examination utilizing scanning electron microscopy (SEM) unveiled the existence of an inconspicuous but weaker zone positioned between the aggregate and the cement paste.

  • The microstructural components within the concrete alone do not provide adequate improvement to the Interfacial Transition Zone (ITZ).

    Scanning Electron Microscopic images of Epoxy concrete:

    RESULTS

    • As per our findings regarding the research on Epoxy adhesives used in this experiment which helps in ITZ enhancement when compared to other adhesives Epoxy reduces voids present in the surface of the aggregate, at the same time this results in less porosity. Hence, it contributes for increase in compressive strength(fck) when compared to our normal design mix(conventional).

    • The behaviour of ultra micro structural elements presents in the Epoxy design mixed concrete obtained by SEM analysis. The enhancement of ITZ as taken place with presence of Epoxy adhesives present in between aggregate and cement paste (ITZ Layer),

      Scanning Electron Microscopic images of Epoxy fibre concrete:

      RESULTS

      • The specialized design mix of Epoxy with fibers comparatively had better results of compressive strength of concrete and Tensile strength to that of conventional and SBR coated design mix aggregates.

      • Epoxy constituting aggregates had a larger strength than that of Epoxy with fiber. Nevertheless, the ITZ layer in case of Epoxy with fiber is quite enhanced with the adhesives, when compared to the conventional and SBR coated aggregate design mix.

      IV.CONCLUSIONS

      Based on the experimental results, the following conclusions can be deduced:

      1. Compressive Strength: The compressive strength of concrete increases over time, with epoxy-coated aggregates demonstrating a significant contribution to the enhancement of compressive strength compared to other mix variations.

      2. Influence of Factors: The compressive strength of concrete is influenced by various factors, including curing conditions and concrete age. Notably, epoxy-coated aggregates exhibit lower initial compressive strength but experience a rapid increase, surpassing SBR, conventional, and SBR with fiber mixes over time.

      3. Tensile Tests: Tensile testing methods, including splitting tensile tests, fatigue tests, and flexural tests, are commonly used. Epoxy-coated aggregates consistently display superior tensile strength when compared to other mixtures.

      4. Stress-Strain Behavior: The stress-strain curve for epoxy-coated aggregates appears to be more linear when compared to the curves of other materials with different coatings.

      5. ITZ Enhancement: Our primary objective of enhancing the Interfacial Transition Zone (ITZ) through adhesives like Epoxy and SBR was successfully achieved. This conclusion is substantiated by the analysis of SEM (Scanning Electron Microscope) data, which provided key findings supporting the desired ITZ enhancement.

      These conclusions underscore the efficacy of epoxy-coated aggregates in enhancing the mechanical properties of concrete, specifically in terms of compressive and tensile strength, as well as the desirable linear behavior in stress-strain curves. Furthermore, the SEM analysis confirmed the successful improvement of the Interfacial Transition Zone as a result of the adhesives used in the study.

      V.REFERENCES

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (2019). IS: 10262 – Guidelines for Concrete Mix Design and Proportioning. New Delhi.

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (1970). IS: 383 – Specifications for Coarse and Fine Aggregates from Natural Sources for Concrete. New Delhi.

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (1988). IS: 4031-Part 7 – Methods of Physical Tests for Hydraulic Cement (Determination of Compressive Strength of Masonry Cement). New Delhi.

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (2000). IS: 456 – Code of Practice for Plain and Reinforced Concrete. New Delhi.

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (1963). IS: 2386-Part 1 – Methods of Test for Aggregates for Concrete: Part 1 – Particle Size and Shape. New Delhi.

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (1963). IS: 2386-Part 3 – Methods of Test for Aggregates for Concrete: Part 3 – Specific Gravity, Density, Voids, Absorption, and Bulking. New Delhi.

  • Bureau of Indian Standards (1959). IS: 516 – Method of Tests for Strength of Concrete. New Delhi.

  • Fosroc International Data Sheet. Parchem Construction Supplies Pty Ltd.

  • Shetty, M. S. (2008). Concrete Technology: Theory and Practice. S. Chand.