- Open Access
- Total Downloads : 360
- Authors : Ms.Ekta Madan
- Paper ID : IJERTV1IS5119
- Volume & Issue : Volume 01, Issue 05 (July 2012)
- Published (First Online): 02-08-2012
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Environmental Auditing As A Management Tool For Evaluation Of Category Wise Biomedical Waste [bmw Rules, 1998] And Its Practices In Hospitals In India
ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING AS A TOOL TO EVALUATE BIO-MEDICAL WASTE
Ms.Ekta Madan
Asst.Prof, E-Max Group of Institutions,Bhaduali,Ambala,India
ABSTRACT The Biomedical waste (BMW) means any waste, which is generated during the diagnosis, treatment or immunization of human beings or animals or in research activities pertaining thereto in the production or testing of biological and including categories mentioned in schedule I of the Rules1. Biomedical waste being generated is potentially hazardous and toxic in nature transmitting various diseases to the residents where it is thrown and dumped. Environmental auditing is a periodic, documented and systematic approach in the management of waste. The data collected for ten categories of waste and study of various waste disposal mechanisms, collection and treatment helps us to have an approach for waste minimization and reduction. Ministry of Environment and Forests (MOEF) has formulated biomedical waste rules, 1998 for management of medical waste. The general approach for environmental audit activities covers three main phases namely collection of information, evaluation of information collected and formulation of conclusions. These three phases are carried out as three steps of Environmental Audit study which plays a great role in the management of biomedical waste. It is a management tool for waste minimization and the reduction of the same.
KEYWORDS Biomedical waste, Biomedical waste Rules, immunization, potentially hazardous, diagnosis, Environmental auditing and waste minimization.
INTRODUCTION Environmental health and safety auditing dates back to the early 1970s when some companies developed audit programs for reviewing and evaluating environmental problems associated with their operations. This concept got projected under different approaches and names such as environmental reviews, survey assessments, quality controls, environmental diagnostic studies depending on the audit programs of the company concerned. The definition of environmental auditing adopted by International Chamber of Commerce in its publication Environmental Auditing (1989) 2is as follows: A management tool comprising a systematic, documented, periodic and objective evaluation of how well environmental organization, management systems and equipment are performing with the aim of facilitating management control of environmental practices and compliance with the company policies including meeting regulatory requirements.
PRESENT STATUS OF BIOMEDICAL WASTE
Issue of biomedical waste need to be addressed and dealt wisely. The problem of medical waste has acquired huge proportions and complex dimensions. Everyday countrys numerous hospitals churn out tons of waste. The disposable syringe one uses with a sense of security may actually be false as these might be repacked in medical waste trafficking.Unmutilated and untreated syringes in the municipal dump may come back in the hospitals and may be used again. Medical waste mismanagement is not only linked with the spread of infectious
agents like HIV but also with indirect problems like endocrine disruption, cancers, reproductive disorders and nervous disorders. Equipments and chemicals used in hospitals like mercury containing instruments, radioactive, cytotoxic drugs etc pose a big threat if not disposed of properly. The most dangerous of all is the needle and sharp waste capable of transmitting infections. Occupational health hazards to health care workers can be reduced to a greater extent by management of health care waste. Rag pickers and others associated with medical waste collection benefit from a proper waste disposal mechanism. Due to infected medical waste in municipal dumps these rag pickers have been exposed to infections. This reflects on the alarming rate with which infectious diseases can be transmitted in the society due to mixing of medical waste with the municipal component. Rules for the management of this waste exist what is needed now is training of all the healthcare staff and setting up of a waste management system in the hospitals.
Health care workers are prone to a lot of problems with medical waste management. Their work may expose them to infectious disease transmission through needle sticks, radiation exposure, diagnostic and therapeutic radio-isotopes, chemotherapy drugs, chemical disinfectants etc.
If the hospitals fail to manage biomedical waste large chunk of this waste reaches municipal dumps where it increases the danger of spread of infection to the community.
RELEVANCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT OF BIOMEDICAL WASTE
Environmental auditing plays a great role in the management of biomedical waste as it has become evident from the studies and research carried out in this field that the periodic, documented and systematic approach in the management of waste helps us to have an approach for the waste minimization and the reduction of the same. The data collected for the ten categories of waste3 and in depth study of the various waste disposal mechanisms, collection and treatment and the technology available helps us to take desired steps. The Ministry Of Environment and Forests has taken the steps in this direction for formulating the BMW rules, 19984 that help the hospitals to manage their wastes properly and reduce the pressure on the environment by posing lesser risk to the environment.
PURPOSE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT
-
Compilation of the complete information on the operational facilities
-
Evaluation of the conditions surrounding the facility to estimate the possible impacts
-
Preparation of the action plan for better control of the environment.
This includes all the work that has been carried out in the project either qualitatively or quantitatively and analysis of whole data is done using statistical formulae wherever required. This waste is being collected, segregated and disposed of by the rules of biomedical waste which segregates this waste category wise on a scale of 1-10.
ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT METHODOLOGY
The general approach for environmental audit activities covers three main phases namely collection of information, evaluation of information collected and formulation of conclusions. These three phases are carried out as three steps of Environmental Audit study which plays a great role in the management of biomedical waste. It is a management tool for waste minimization and the reduction of the same. These three steps are as follows-
-
Pre-Audit Methodology involves the preparation of questionnaire based on the factors covering the following aspects:-
-
Quantum of waste being generated
-
Waste disposal facilities
-
Segregation of waste category wise or quality wise
-
Biomedical waste rules
-
Auditing probes.
-
-
On-site methodology involves
-
Summary of each hospital one by one giving each the time of 4-7 days.
-
Inventory of each ward and the quantity being generated as per records available
-
Differentiation of waste quality wise/category wise as per1998 BMW Rules
-
Evaluation of waste disposal facilities quantity wise
-
Evaluation of wastes with respect to potential dangers to human health
-
Analysis of existing waste management practices.
-
-
Post Audit Methodology involves
-
Preparation of Audt report
-
Recommendations regarding management system and waste disposal facilities
-
STUDY OF BIOMEDICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT IN HOSPITALS/NURSING HOMES
SITE SELECTION
Private hospitals and nursing homes small or big are coming up speedily with all the modern facilites.These towns provide adequate sites and proper samples for the study. Bhopal district is almost 80% urbanized with most people living in the city of Bhopal. As the principal city of the region, it serves all towns and districts around, then nearest large city of Indore being about 180 km. to west5. There are no proper waste management practices being followed in the hospitals of M.P. even after the implementation of Bio-medical Waste (Management & Handling) Rules, 1998 by the government. This was confirmed by the surveys done in these hospitals but the conditions were worst in the government managed hospitals as compared to privately managed hospitals.So a comparative analysis study is taken up for the government run and private hospitals/nursing homes of two major towns of Madhya Pradesh.
STUDY AREA
Bhopal, the administrative capital of M.P. and Indore the industrial capital of the state has been selected for the study area. The present study has been carried out in six hospitals of Bhopal and Indore cities, three hospitals of each study area were chosen. Out of these three one is government hospital and other two are private hospitals of each city. In total four hospitals of study area are private and two are government hospitals.
The hospitals are chosen mainly in which the average number of the beds are in the range of 300-950 for four hospitals and less than 300 for two hospitals. The respondents were a group of people in each of the hospitals that included doctors, nurses, ward boys and management personnel. Each of them was given a set of questionnaire to be filled up by them, giving the
details of hospital management in general and biomedical waste management in particular. The set of questionnaire was prepared only after consulting State Pollution Control Board (SPCB)and Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB)officials, making visits to the hospitals, contacting them for inventory and finalizing questionnaire set with them for data collection.
-
HAMIDIA HOSPITAL GOVERNMENT (885 Beds) BHOPAL
-
M.Y.HOSPITAL GOVERNMENT (917Beds) INDORE
-
KASTURBA HOSPITAL (BHEL), PRIVATE (350 Beds) BHOPAL
-
PEOPLES GENERAL HOSPITAL PRIVATE (100 Beds) BHOPAL
-
CHOITRAM HOSPITAL PRIVATE (250 Beds) INDORE
-
GOKULDAS HOSPITAL LTD. PRIVATE (130 Beds) INDORE ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT METHODOLOGY FOR BMW DATA COLLECTION 1.Data collection for Pre-Audit part
The data was collected from Central Pollution Control Board and State Pollution Control Board offices of Bhopal and Indore cities. This mainly included the inventories having schedules, questionnaires, Central Pollution Control Board reports etc.Hospital records were collected which included the quantity wise waste being generated from the hospitals.
-
Data collection for On Site-Audit part
The data collected through questionnaires prepared by contacting management authorities, doctors, nurses and ward boys. Questionnaires were both close ended (giving options/y or n) and open ended (questions prepared specifically for data collection).
-
Data collection for Post -Audit part
The Quantitative data (Inventory of waste) of all the hospitals can be utilized to calculate it statistically taking up various variables converting it into a usable form for interpretation and analytical purposes reaching at the conclusion. The three important profile scores were developed using statistical equations which are given in the result and discussion section.
-
Risk Potential Score for all the hospitals.
-
Percentage profile of each Category waste in six hospitals
-
Performance profile of each hospital on Total Waste generation in each hospital
The Qualitative data (Certifications) of all the hospitals is analyzed by studying their management systems and various certifications which they adhere to or made mandatory by the government.
-
Study of present waste disposal mechanisms
-
Study of Management systems being followed in the hospitals
OBSERVATIONS FROM THE SURVEYS
The total waste being generated is quantified by the different category waste. The segregation, collection, treatment and disposal of each waste category were studied and all the data collected is given in the table form for each of the hospital of the two towns.
I.INVENTORY OF WASTE FOR KASTURBA HOSPITAL (BHEL), BHOPAL, PVT (350
bedded)
CATEGORY WASTE |
SEGREGATI ON |
WASTE/DAY( KG) |
COLLECTION / TREATMENT |
DISPOSAL |
Category 1 |
Human |
3-4 |
Yellow bags |
Ash by deep |
Anatomical Waste |
Collected by Bhopal Incinerators Ltd. |
burial or goes to |
||
– |
municipal waste |
|||
Category 2 |
Animal Waste |
0 |
– |
– |
Category 3 |
Microbiology & Biotechnology Waste |
5-10 |
Yellow bags Collected by Bhopal Incinerators Ltd. |
Organic manure formation |
Category 4 |
Waste Sharps Needles, bottles broken glassware |
30-40 |
In puncture proof blue containers Needles, sharps mutilated and disinfected by hypochlorite |
Broken glass recycled |
Category 5 |
Discarded Medicines and Cytotoxic drugs |
0.5-1 |
Black bags No special treatment |
Disposed in secured landfill |
Category 6 |
Soiled Waste (items contaminated with blood, cotton linens) |
25-30 |
Red bags Collected by Bhopal Incinerators Ltd. |
Ash by deep burial or goes to municipal waste |
Category 7 |
Solid Waste (Waste generated from disposal items |
180 |
Buckets with hypochlorite solution Decontamination with the hypochlorite |
Plastic bottles and tubing sent for recycling after disinfecting and mutilation |
Category 8 |
Liquid Waste |
4 |
Goes to sewerage with ETP at Barkhera |
Discharge into drains |
Category 9 |
Incineration Ash |
0 |
– |
– |
Category 10 |
Chemical |
10lit. |
– |
For |
Waste |
disinfection |
|||
– |
||||
– |
discharge into drain to |
|||
ETP |
WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL |
WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES |
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM |
KASTURBA HOSPITAL(BHEL),BHOPAL,PVT |
Entered into contract with Bhopal Incinerators Ltd |
Got ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001. Entered into contract with Eureka Forbes Ltd. For cleaning services. |
II.INVENTORY OF WASTE FOR PEOPLES GENERAL HOSPITAL, BHOPAL, PVT. (100)
CATEGORY WASTE |
SEGREGATION |
WASTE/DAY(K G) |
COLLECTION / |
TREATMENT |
DISPOSAL |
Category 1 |
Human Anatomical |
3 |
Yellow bags |
Incinerator |
Ash by deep |
Waste |
working in the old |
burial or goes |
|||
hospital |
to municipal |
||||
waste |
|||||
Category 2 |
Animal Waste |
0 |
|||
Category 3 |
Microbiology & |
1 |
Yellow bags |
Treatment in their |
|
Biotechnology Waste |
hospital |
||||
Category 4 |
Waste Sharps |
0.5 |
In puncture proof |
Needles,sharps |
Broken glass |
Needles,bottles, |
blue containers |
mutilated and |
recycled |
||
broken glassware |
disinfected by |
||||
hypochlorite |
|||||
Category 5 |
Discarded Medicines |
0.5 |
Black bags |
No special |
Disposed in |
and Cytotoxic drugs |
treatment |
secured |
|||
landfill |
|||||
Category 6 |
Soiled Waste |
3 |
Red bags |
Taken to their own |
Ash by deep |
(items contaminated |
incinerator |
burial or goes |
|||
with blood, cotton |
to municipal |
||||
linens |
waste |
||||
Category 7 |
Solid Waste |
0.5 |
Buckets with |
Decontamination |
Plastic bottles |
(Waste generated |
hypochlorite |
with the |
and tubing |
||
from disposal items |
solution |
hypochlorite |
sent for |
||
recycling after |
|||||
disinfecting |
|||||
and mutilation |
|||||
Category 8 |
Liquid Waste |
2 |
Goes to sewerage |
Discharge into |
|
drains |
|||||
Category 9 |
Incineration Ash |
0 |
– |
– |
– |
Category 10 |
Chemical Waste |
1.5lit |
Discharge into |
||
drain |
WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL |
WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES |
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM |
PEOPLES GENERAL HOSPITAL, BHOPAL, PVT. |
1.Incinerator(1) 2.Autoclave 3.Needle cutters |
In the process for applying ISO 9000 SERIES, Total Quality Management System |
III.INVENTORY OF WASTE FOR HAMIDIA HOSPITAL,BHOPAL,GOVT.(885)
CATEGORY WASTE |
SEGREGATION |
WASTE/DAY(K G) |
COLLECTION / |
TREATMENT |
DISPOSAL |
Category 1 |
Human Anatomical |
300 |
Incineration |
||
Waste |
|||||
Category 2 |
Animal Waste |
0 |
|||
Category 3 |
Microbiology & |
100 |
No collection |
No treatment |
No disposal |
Biotechnology Waste |
facility |
facility |
system |
||
Category 4 |
Waste Sharps |
300 |
No collection |
No treatment |
No disposal |
Needles,bottles, |
facility |
facility |
system |
||
broken glassware |
|||||
Category 5 |
Discarded Medicines |
250 |
No collection |
No treatment |
No disposal |
and Cytotoxic drugs |
facility |
facility |
system |
||
Category 6 |
Soiled Waste |
2000 |
Incineration |
||
(items contaminated |
|||||
with blood, cotton |
|||||
linens |
|||||
Category 7 |
Solid Waste |
1500 |
No collection |
No treatment |
No disposal |
(Waste generated |
facility |
facility |
system |
||
from disposal items |
|||||
Category 8 |
Liquid Waste |
150 |
No collection |
No treatment |
Discharge into |
facility |
facility |
drains |
|||
Category 9 |
Incineration Ash |
20 |
No collection |
No treatment |
No disposal |
facility |
facility |
system |
|||
Category 10 |
Chemical Waste |
100 |
Discharge into |
||
drains |
WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL |
WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES |
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM |
HAMIDIA HOSPITAL,BHOPAL,GOVT |
Incinerator(1) |
No Existing Management System |
IV.INVENTORY OF WASTE FOR CHOITRAM HOSPITAL,INDORE,PVT.(250)
CATEGORY WASTE |
SEGREGATION |
WASTE/DAY(K G) |
COLLECTION / |
TREATMENT |
DISPOSAL |
Category 1 |
Human Anatomical |
4-5 |
Yellow bags |
Incineration |
Ash by deep |
Waste |
burial or goes |
||||
to municipal |
|||||
waste |
|||||
Category 2 |
Animal Waste |
0 |
|||
Category 3 |
Microbiology & |
20 |
Yellow bags |
Autoclaving |
Organic |
Biotechnology Waste |
manure |
||||
formation |
|||||
Category 4 |
Waste Sharps |
200 |
In puncture proof |
Needles,sharps |
Broken glass |
blue containers |
mutilated and |
recycled |
|||
disinfected by |
|||||
hypochlorite |
|||||
Category 5 |
Discarded Medicines |
0.5-1 |
Black bags |
No special |
Disposed in |
and Cytotoxic drugs |
treatment |
secured |
|||
landfill |
|||||
Category 6 |
Soiled Waste |
25-30 |
Red bags |
Taken to their own |
Ash by deep |
(items contaminated |
incinerator |
burial or goes |
|||
with blood, cotton |
to municipal |
||||
linens |
waste |
||||
Category 7 |
Solid Waste |
180 |
Buckets with |
Decontamination |
Plastic bottles |
(Waste generated |
hypochlorite |
with the |
and tubing |
||
from disposal items |
solution |
hypochlorite |
sent for |
||
recycling after |
|||||
disinfecting |
|||||
and mutilation |
|||||
Category 8 |
Liquid Waste |
– |
Goes to sewerage |
Discharge into |
|
with ETP |
drains |
||||
connected |
|||||
Category 9 |
Incineration Ash |
8-10 |
No collection |
No treatment |
Ash by deep |
facility |
facility |
burial or goes |
|||
to municipal |
|||||
waste |
|||||
Category 10 |
Chemical Waste |
20-24lit |
For |
||
disinfection |
|||||
purpose |
|||||
discharge into |
|||||
drain to ETP |
WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL |
WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES |
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM |
CHOITRAM HOSPITAL,INDORE,PVT |
Incinerator(1),Autoclave,Needle cutters,Microwave,ETP |
Got ISO 14001 EMS |
V.INVENTORY OF WASTE FOR GOKULDAS HOSPITAL LTD.,INDORE,PVT(130)
CATEGORY WASTE |
SEGREGATION |
WASTE/DAY(K G) |
COLLECTION / |
TREATMENT |
DISPOSAL |
Category 1 |
Human Anatomical |
1 |
Yellow bags |
HOSWIN |
– |
Waste |
Incinerator |
||||
Pvt.Ltd |
|||||
Category 2 |
Animal Waste |
0 |
– |
– |
– |
Category 3 |
Microbiology & |
1 |
Yellow bags |
Autoclaving |
|
Biotechnology Waste |
|||||
Category 4 |
Waste Sharps |
6 |
In puncture proof |
Needles,sharps |
Broken glass |
blue containers |
mutilated and |
recycled |
|||
disinfected by |
|||||
hypochlorite |
|||||
Category 5 |
Discarded Medicines |
0 |
|||
and Cytotoxic drugs |
|||||
Category 6 |
Soiled Waste |
60 |
Red bags |
Taken HOSWIN |
Ash by deep |
(items contaminated |
Incinerator |
burial or goes |
|||
with blood, cotton |
Pvt.Ltd |
to municipal |
|||
linens |
waste |
||||
Category 7 |
Solid Waste |
10 |
Buckets with |
Decontamination |
Plastic bottles |
(Waste generated |
hypochlorite |
with the |
and tubing |
||
from disposal items |
solution |
hypochlorite |
sent for |
||
recycling after |
|||||
disinfecting |
|||||
and mutilation |
|||||
Category 8 |
Liquid Waste |
3kl/day |
Goes to sewerage |
Discharge into |
|
with ETP |
drains |
||||
connected |
|||||
Category 9 |
Incineration Ash |
– |
No collection |
No treatment |
|
facility |
facility |
||||
Category 10 |
Chemical Waste |
20-25lit |
For |
||
disinfection |
|||||
purpose |
|||||
discharge into |
|||||
drain to ETP |
WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL |
WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES |
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM |
|
GOKULDAS |
HOSPITAL |
1. Contract with HOSWIN |
In the process of applying ISO 14001 |
LTD.,INDORE,PVT |
Incinerator Pvt.Ltd.for the safe |
||
disposal of waste. |
|||
2.Needle cutters in all the units |
VI.INVENTORY OF WASTE FOR M.Y.HOSPITAL,INDORE,GOVT(917)
CATEGORY WASTE |
SEGREGATION |
WASTE/DAY(K G) |
COLLECTION / |
TREATMENT |
DISPOSAL |
Category 1 |
Human Anatomical Waste |
200 |
No collection facility |
No Incineration |
No disposal system |
Category 2 |
Animal Waste |
0 |
– |
– |
– |
Category 3 |
Microbiology & Biotechnology Waste |
100 |
No collection facility |
No treatment facility |
No disposal system |
Category 4 |
Waste Sharps |
300 |
No collection facility |
No treatment facility |
No disposal system |
Category 5 |
Discarded Medicines and Cytotoxic drugs |
200 |
No collection facility |
No treatment facility |
No disposal system |
Category 6 |
Soiled Waste (items contaminated with blood, cotton linens |
2000-2500 |
No collection facility |
No treatment facility |
No disposal system |
Category 7 |
Solid Waste (Waste generated from disposal items |
1200 |
No collection facility |
No treatment facility |
No disposal system |
Category 8 |
Liquid Waste |
90 |
No collection facility |
No treatment facility |
Discharge into drains |
Category 9 |
Incineration Ash |
0 |
No collection facility |
No treatment facility |
No disposal system |
Category 10 |
Chemical Waste |
50 |
– |
– |
Discharge into drains |
WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM IN HOSPITAL
HOSPITAL |
WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES |
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM |
M.Y.HOSPITAL,INDORE,GOVT |
Incinerator(1) |
No Existing Management System |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
RESULT I-
CALCULATION OF RISK POTENTIAL SCORE
This score depend on the total waste being generated from each of the hospitals being taken into consideration and the score given to each of the hospital on the ranking of State Pollution Control Board
Evaluation of this risk potential score was done by giving the category waste rank and score. The scale was developed on which all the six hospitals were evaluated following the criteria of-
-
Quantity of each category of waste being generated in all the six hospitals.
-
Importance given to each category of waste w.r.t. environmental pollution.
The following is the nine point scale developed foe pair wise comparisons for capturing the importance of various category of waste w.r.t. environmental pollution.
The table is developed for the category of waste by categorizing them on the basis of their intensity of importance from equal importance to extreme importance of the waste by its potential hazard and then converting this intensity of importance ranking to score designated on that scale from 1-9
The intensity of importance is given to the category waste in ranking based on their potential hazard to the environmental pollution. The score is developed from 1-9 scale giving score 9 to waste category of extreme hazard and giving score 1 to waste category of least or equal importance
Table formulated for developing score on the basis of intensity of importance of waste
Intensity of importance
Definition
Score (R)
I
Extreme importance
9
II
Very to extremely strong importance
8
III
Very strong importance
7
IV
Strong to Very strong importance
6
V
Strong importance
5
VI
Moderate to strong importance
4
VII
Moderate importance
3
VIII
Equal to Moderate importance
2
IX
Equal importance
1
Table formed on the basis of ranks and score given by State Pollution Control Board (SPCB) to each category of waste
Catg waste
Ranking SPCB
Score developed
Peoples Total waste
Kg/day
Choitram
Total waste
Kg/day
Gokuldas
Total waste
Kg/day
Hamidia
Total waste
Kg/day
M.Y.
Total waste
Kg/day
BHEL
Total waste
Kg/day
1
VI
4
3
5
0.83
300
200
4
2
VI
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
I
9
1
20
0.03
100
100
10
4
I
9
0.5
15
0.2
300
300
40
5
IX
1
0.5
1
0
250
200
1
6
II
8
3
30
2
2000
2500
30
7
VIII
2
0.5
15
0.3
1500
1200
180
8
IV
6
2
8.4
3
150
90
4
9
IX
1
0
10
0
20
0
0
10
VII
3
1.5
24
0.5
100
50
10
Wi
X1
X2
X3
X4
X5
X6
The evaluation equation becomes
RP=
RP=Risk potential of a waste category Wi =Score assigned to a category of waste
Xi= X1 X2 X3 X4 X5 X6 is the quantity of waste generated in each category
-
RP4= Risk potential of Hamidia hospital=100.42 2.RP5= Risk potential of MY hospital=98.72
-
3.RP6= Risk potential of Kasturba,BHEL hospital=5.936 4.RP1= Risk potential of Peoples general hospital=1.436 5.RP2= Risk potential of Choitram hospital=23.87 6.RP3= Risk potential of Gokuldas hospital=0.88
DISCUSSION-
The chart shows the comparative risk analysis of all the hospitals depending on the total waste being generated from them by comparisons of their risk potential scores.
-
HAMIDIA HOSPITAL BHOPAL, GOVT =100
-
M.Y.HOSPITAL,INDORE,GOVT(917)=98.72
-
CHOITRAM HOSPITAL, INDORE, PVT.(250)=23.87
-
KASTURBA HOSPITAL(BHEL),BHOPAL,PVT(350 bedded)=5.936
-
PEOPLES GENERAL HOSPITAL, BHOPAL,PVT(100)=1.436
-
GOKULDAS HOSPITAL LTD.,INDORE,PVT=0.88
RESULT II-
PERCENTAGE PROFILE OF CATEGORY WASTE IN THE SIX HOSPITALS
CATEGORY WASTE |
SEGREGATION |
Percentage of waste in the six hospitals |
||
Category 1 |
Human Anatomical |
Waste |
25% |
|
Category 2 |
Animal Waste |
nil |
||
Category 3 |
Microbiology & Biotechnology Waste |
8% |
||
Category |
4 |
Waste Sharps Needles,bottles, broken glassware |
4% |
|
Category |
5 |
Discarded Medicines Cytotoxic drugs |
and |
4% |
Category 6 |
Soiled Waste (items contaminated with blood, cotton linens |
25% |
||
Category 7 |
Solid Waste (Waste generated from disposal items |
4% |
||
Category 8 |
Liquid |
Waste |
17% |
|
Category 9 |
Incineration Ash |
nil |
||
Category 10 |
Chemical Waste |
13% |
DISCUSSION-
This profile shows the total category waste of each hospital being generated. The category 1and category 6 wastes are generated maximum from all the six hospitals and their treatment and disposal involves the use of incinerators, autoclaves or microwaves.
RESULT III-
III.PERFORMANCE PROFILE OF EACH HOSPITAL ON TOTAL WASTE GENERATION IN EACH HOSPITAL
The following findings show the performance of each hospital taking number of beds as the input and total waste generated in each of the hospital as the output of the hospital. This performance profile takes into consideration the following two factors:
-
Total number of beds
-
Occupancy Rate
SPCB INVENTORY OF NO. OF BEDS, TOTAL WASTE, OCCUPANCY RATE
NO. |
NAME OF HOSPITAL |
NO OF BEDS |
TOTAL WASTE GENERATE |
OCCUPANCY RATE |
1 |
PEOPLESGENERAL HOSPITAL,BHOPAL |
100 |
12 |
0.4 |
2 |
CHOITRAM HOSPITAL,INDORE,PVT |
350 |
128.4 |
0.7 |
3 |
GOKULDAS HOSPITAL LTD.,INDORE |
130 |
6.86 |
0.6 |
4 |
HAMIDIA HOSPITAL,BHOPAL |
885 |
4720 |
0.76 |
5 |
M.Y.HOSPITAL,INDORE |
917 |
4640 |
0.85 |
6 |
KASTURBA HOSPITAL(BHEL),BHOPAL |
300 |
279 |
0.3 |
SPCB INVENTORY OF SIX HOSPITALS (TAKING NO OF BEDS CONSTANT)
NO. |
NAME OF HOSPITAL |
NO OF BEDS |
TOTAL WASTE GENERATE |
OCCUPANCY RATE |
1 |
PEOPLES GENERAL HOSPITAL,BHOPAL |
100 |
12 |
0.4 |
2 |
CHOITRAM HOSPITAL,INDORE,PVT |
100 |
36.68 |
0.2 |
3 |
GOKULDAS HOSPITAL LTD.,INDORE |
100 |
5.277 |
0.46 |
4 |
HAMIDIA HOSPITAL,BHOPAL |
100 |
533.3 |
0.086 |
5 |
M.Y.HOSPITAL,INDORE |
100 |
505.99 |
0.093 |
6 |
KASTURBA HOSPITAL(BHEL),BHOPAL |
100 |
93 |
0.1 |
DISCUSSION-
Taking the number of beds constant the waste quantity generated by all the six hospitals is measured on a comparative scale by using bar chart column graph
-
The maximum amount of waste is generated by Hamidia hospital with the greatest value which is a government hospital and not functioning as per the Biomedical waste rules and its handling.
-
The second rank goes to MY hospital which is also a government run organization.
-
Gokuldas hospital of Indore is generating minimum biomedical waste from its hospital and managing the treatment and disposal of waste properly as per state rules
CONCLUSIONS
Conclusions that can be drawn from Result and Discussion
-
RISK POTENTIAL SCORE
The risk potential score is maximum for Hamidia Hospital,Bhopal posing greatest danger to the environmental security and having maximum risk for causing environmental pollution and Gokuldas Hospital is least damaging to the environment having the minimum risk potential score.
RANKING OF ALL HOSPITALS ON RISK POTENTIAL SCORE
Name of the hospital
Rank
Score
HAMIDIA HOSPITAL GOVERNMENT (885 Beds) BHOPAL
I
100.42
M.Y.HOSPITAL/p>
GOVERNMENT
(917Beds) INDORE
II
98.72
CHOITRAM HOSPITAL PRIVATE (250 Beds) INDORE
III
23.87
KASTURBA HOSPITAL (BHEL), PRIVATE (350 Beds) BHOPAL
IV
5.936
PEOPLES GENERAL HOSPITAL PRIVATE (100 Beds) BHOPAL
V
1.436
GOKULDAS HOSPITAL LTD. PRIVATE (130
Beds) INDORE
VI
0.88
-
CATEGORY WISE WASTE PROFILE
In the category wise waste generation maximum waste is in the Category 1(Human anatomical waste) and Category 6 (Solid waste) with 25% of the waste out of the total amount of waste being generated in all the six hospitals.
-
TOTAL WASTE PROFILE
The maximum amount of waste being generated taking the number of beds to be constant in each category waste is that by the Hamidia Hospital,Bhopal.
-
WASTE DISPOSAL FACILITIES
In the waste disposal facilities Choitram Hospital is the best having all the upgraded technologies and the maximum disposal facilities and all of them in all the working conditions.
-
WASTE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES
In the waste management practices Kasturba hospital ( BHEL) is the best having the ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001 Certification for the better management of their processes and the hospital management
REFERENCES
-
Minstry of Environment and Forests, Notification N. S.O.630 (E). Biomedical waste (management and handling) rules, 1998. The Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3(ii), dated 27th July, 1998. 10-20, 460.
-
ICC guide to effective environmental auditing. Paris: ICC Publishing S.A.. Ryding, S.-O. 1992p. 414
-
Minstry of Environment and Forests, Notification N. S.O.630 (E). Biomedical waste (management and handling) rules, 1998. Schedule I, BMW rules, 1998(MOEF)
-
Minstry of Environment and Forests, Notification N. S.O.630 (E). Biomedical waste (management and handling) rules, 1998.
-
Bhopal CDP_Final.pdf,Bhopal city development plan under jnnurm (jawaharlal nehru national urban renewal mission)