Evaluation of Mechanical Properties in Banana Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Polymer Composites

DOI : 10.17577/IJERTV4IS060429

Download Full-Text PDF Cite this Publication

  • Open Access
  • Total Downloads : 718
  • Authors : Sooraj Karadi S, Iranna Belawadi, Raghavendra S, Attel Manjunath
  • Paper ID : IJERTV4IS060429
  • Volume & Issue : Volume 04, Issue 06 (June 2015)
  • DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17577/IJERTV4IS060429
  • Published (First Online): 13-06-2015
  • ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
  • Publisher Name : IJERT
  • License: Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Text Only Version

Evaluation of Mechanical Properties in Banana Fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Polymer Composites

Sooraj Karadi S1, Iranna Belawadi2

1, 2Post Graduate Students, Dept of Mechanical Engineering Acharya Institute of Technology

Bangalore, India

Raghavendra. S3, Attel Manjunath4

3, 4Associate Professor, Dept of Mechanical Engineering Acharya Institute of Technology

Bangalore, India

AbstractComposite materials with thermoplastic polymer matrices and a reinforcement of natural fibers are increasingly regarded as an alternative to material replacement for various applications. In this work two types of Polypropylene (PP) which is a thermoplastic polymer, Banana fiber which is a natural fiber and a coupling agent named Maleic Anhydride Polypropylene (MAPP) are used in different combination to get the specimen using vertical injection moulding machine and mechanical properties such as tensile, bending and impact strength, water absorption test, SEM test were studied.

KeywordsBanana fiber; polypropelene; MAPP; injection moulding

  1. INTRODUCTION

    In todays world, plastic become vitally important part of life. It is said mostly as disposable carry bags, bottles, containers, food-wraps and product of packing, but there is no particularly disposable about most plastics. If plastics are used in small amount it will be very helpful to us to keep the environment safe, but it is used in staggering quantities.

    The usage of plastics is becoming huge and it is unavoidable; Plastics are mainly carbon based polymers made from petroleum oil which is a non-renewable resources and it is becoming increasingly expensive. Thinking of Environment, now its time to think for alternative. As a result the hottest developments are the increasing interest in plastics prepared from organic matter rather than petroleum which are BIOPLASTICS.

    Fiber Reinforced Plastics (FRP), in which manmade fibers such as glass, carbon, boron etc. are used as reinforcing materials. The main reason for getting interest in FRP is due to their high stiffness, high strength to weight ratio, specific modulus compared to other conventional materials. Now a days natural fibers like banana, sisal, jute, cotton and other natural fibers have attracted the attention of technologists and scientists for application in packing, low cost housing and other structures. Natural fibers composites can exhibit required mechanical strength and properties such as better electrical resistance, acoustics insulating properties and good thermal properties. Since the low cost, less weight, and density of natural fibers make them an attractive alternative. The increasing interest ininexpensive reinforcement,renewable, degradable materials which have

    been environment- friendly has stimulated the use of hard cellulose fibers. Banana fibersare hard cellulosic fiberstherefore it has got reasonably high tensile and elongation at break.

    Many scientist and technologists have made many attempts to make use of natural fibers in the fabrication of FRP [1, 2].The following reasons shows their efforts to introduce the natural fibers as composites.

    1. Natural fibers are easily available and are renewable resources.

    2. Composite with specific strengths because of their low density.

    3. They are nontoxic and eco-friendly and biodegradable and are quite cheap.

      In this paper, two types of bio-plastics i.e. two types of polypropylene are used as matrices and banana fiber as a reinforcing material are used to prepare a composite material. The mechanical properties of different combination of fiber and matrix are studied and results were reported.

  2. MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTAL

      1. Materials

        Two types of PP were used as the polymer matrix and was obtained from Selan Bioscience, Naroda, Ahmedabad, India. Banana fibers were obtained from SheebaFiber and Handicraft, Poovancode, Tamilnadu, India. The coupling agent was MAPP, type G-3002 was obtained from Eastman Chemical Products (Kingston, Tamilnadu).

        Fig. 1 PP type-1 Compostable Polypropylene (PP1)

        Fig. 2 PP type-2 Biodegradable Polypropylene (PP2)

      2. Fiber extraction and surface treatment

        During extraction of natural fiber from plant care should be taken to avoid damage. In the present experiment, first the sections of banana plant were cut from the main stem and then excess moisture was removed by lightly rolling action. Impurities in the fibres such as pigments, broken fibres, coating of cellulose etc. were removed manually by means of comb, and then the fibres were cleaned and dried.

        1) Alkali treatment

        5% solution of NaOH was prepared and the dry banana fiber was soaked in the solution for about 4h to remove the unwanted soluble cellulose, hemi cellulose,pectin, ligin, etc from the fiber. Later treated banana fiber was washed in distilled water to remove excess of NaOH and dried under the sunlight for about 6-8h.

        The treated banana fiber was chopped into smaller length and grinded into fine powder. The grain size of powdered banana fiber was tested using sand testing machine and it was obtained around 100 140 microns.

      3. Combination of Materials

        Table 1 shows how different combination of materials is done to prepare composite materials.

        TABLE 1.Different combination of materials.

        Sl.No

        PP type

        %of PP

        % of fiber

        % of MAPP

        1

        1

        100

        2

        1

        70

        30

        3

        1

        65

        30

        5

        4

        2

        100

        5

        2

        70

        30

        6

        2

        65

        30

        5

      4. Composite fabrication

        A 2 part mould box was made each with the dimension of 170 mm (L) x 25 mm (W) x 1.5 mm (T), so as to get the cavity of 3 mm (T). The runner is made for the flow of molten material into the cavity.

        Fig. 3 Two part mould box

        The hot press moulding machine consists of a hopper, plunger, clamper, hydraulic system, electrical motor, and a temperature control unit. In this process the different combination of materials as shown in Table 1 are feed into the hopper and it is set to desired temperature to melt the materials inside the hopper. Now the plunger whit high pressure pushes the molten material into the mould cavity.

        Fig. 4 Hot press moulding machine

        Fig. 5 Samples made with PP1

        Fig. 6 Samples made with PP2

      5. Testing of the composites

    The composite specimens were tested as per ASTM standards. Tensile test was done as per ASTM D 638-I with the help of Universal Testing Machine KIC-2-1000-C Capacity 100 KN. The specimen dimensions were (165 x 19 x 3) mm. Flexural testing was done as per ASTM D 5943-96 standards using three point bending method at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min and the specimen dimensions were (100 x 15 x 3) mm. The impact testing was done as per ASTMD 256 by Izod impact machine, the specimen dimensions were (64 x

    12.7 x 3 mm. In each case, 4 samples were tested and average values were reported.

    Water absorption test is very important to determine the water absorptivity of the composite. A dimesion of (10 x 10 x 3) mm is cut from each samples and made dipped in water for few days. For a regular interval of time its weight is checked and results are discussed.

  3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

    Tensile strength, flexural strength and impact strength of composites were presented in table 2 at different combinations of PP, Fiber and MAPP. For proper understanding of the effect of different strength separate chart have been plotted.

    TABLE 2.Mechanical properties of composites.

    Samples

    UTS

    ( MPa)

    3Pt Flexural Strength (MPa)

    Impact Strength (J)

    PP1

    1.77

    37.68

    12.1

    PP1 + fiber

    2.06

    37.68

    16.4

    PP1 + fiber + MAPP

    3.90

    10.05

    19.4

    PP2

    2.51

    29.49

    17.5

    PP2 + fiber

    1.49

    37.95

    17.3

    PP2 + fiber + MAPP

    0.67

    22.10

    19.7

    Fig. 7 Chart showing strength for different type of composites

    Water absorption test is very important to determine the composite reaction, fiber reaction and molecular instability leading to decrement in strength and shape and tend to failure of the component. Table.3 shows the results of water absorption test.

    TABLE 3. Water absorption capacity

    Samples

    Initial weight in

    gm

    Water absorption %

    24

    (hours)

    48

    (hours)

    72

    (hours)

    96

    (hours)

    120

    (hours)

    PP1

    2.90

    1.00

    1.07

    1.13

    1.20

    1.24

    PP1 + fibre

    2.95

    1.01

    1.08

    1.12

    1.18

    1.25

    PP1+fiber+MAPP

    3.00

    1.02

    1.08

    1.15

    1.2

    1.23

    PP2

    2.90

    1.02

    1.06

    1.13

    1.18

    1.24

    PP2+fibre

    3.00

    1.03

    1.1

    1.17

    1.21

    1.23

    PP2+fib+MAPP

    3.10

    1.04

    1.12

    1.19

    1.25

    1.32

    SEM: The SEM images of fractured surfaces of composite made with different combination of PP1, fiber and MAPP are shown in below figures.

    Fig. 8a SEM image of PP1+fiber

    Fig. 8b SEM image of PP1+fiber+MAPP

    Fig. 8c SEM image of PP2+fiber

    Fig. 8d SEM image of PP2+fiber+MAPP

    The above images reveals that the adhesion between the fiber and matrix has increased upon the addition of MAPP in both the cases, but the quality of adhesion was better in the first case PP1+fiber+MAPP it can be observed in the Fig. 8b Therefore PP1+fiber+MAPP have got higher UTS. Fig. 8c and Fig. 8d shows that the PP2 matrix has poor boding property with fiber and MAPP, due to this reason UTS of PP2 with the addition of fiber and MAPP has decreased.

  4. CONCLUSIONS

  • This work shows that successful fabrication of banana fiber reinforced polypropylene composites by injection moulding technique.

  • In this work it shows, after fabricating polymer composite and subjected to various mechanical tests like Tensile, Flexural, Impact, Water absorption, etc., the Banana fiber has potential to use as a good replacement to use as reinforcement in Polymer Matrix Composite (PMC).

  • The sample made with PP1+fiber+MAPP shows a UTS of

    3.90 MPa, which indicates that promisable candidate material in FRP composites.

  • The impact strength initially obtained was 12.1 J, but after adding both fiber and MAPP it shows a considerable increment resulting 19.7 J.

  • In general the Mechanical properties of composite made with PP1 showed good results when compared to PP2.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Authors would like to thank the Management of Acharya Institute of Technology, Principal, Head of Department and our professors for supporting us and would also like to thank the Manager of Associate Tools for providing the facilities to carry out this work

REFERENCES

  1. G.C.Mohankumar, Natural Areca Fibers and their Composites, Workshop on Natural Fiber Composites, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India, 2002

  2. R.P.Swamy, G.C.Mohankumar, etal. Study of areca reinforced Phenol Formaldehyde Composites, Journal of reinforced plastics and composites, Vol.23, No. 13, 2004.

  3. Y. Cao, S. Shibata, I. Fukumoto, Mechanical properties of biodegradable composites reinforced with bagasse fibre before and after alkali treatments, Composites: Part A 37 (2006) 423429.

  4. Satyanarayana K. G., Sukumaran K., Pavithran C., Mukherjee P. S., Pillai S. G. K., Natural Fiber-Polymer Composites, Cement and Concrete Composites, 12 (1990), pp. 117-136.

  5. Pothan L. A, Thomas S., Neelakantan N. R., Short Banana Fiber Reinforced Polyester Composites: Mechanical, Failure and Aging Characteristics, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 16(1997), pp. 744-765.

  6. F. T. Wallenberger, Value-in-use of composite reinforcing fibers, MRS Proceedings, vol. 702, 2001.

  7. S. Joseph, M. S. Sreekala, Z. Oommen, P. Koshy, and S. Thomas, A comparison of the mechanical properties of phenol formaldehyde composites reinforced with banana fibres and glass fibres, Composites Science and Technology, vol. 62, no. 14, pp. 18571868, 2002.

  8. L.A. Pothan, S.Thomas, andN. R.Neelakantan, Short banana fiber reinforced polyester composites: mechanical, failure and aging characteristics, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 744765, 1997.

  9. G. Kalaprasad, B. Francis, S. Thomas et al., Effect of fibre length and chemical modifications on the tensile properties of intimately mixed short sisal/glass hybrid fibre reinforced low density polyethylene composites, Polymer International, vol. 53, no. 11, pp. 16241638, 2004.

  10. G. Kalaprasad, G. Mathew, C. Pavithran, and S. Thomas, Melt rheological behavior of intimately mixed short sisal-glass hybrid fiber- reinforced low-density polyethylene composites. I. Untreated fibers, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol. 89,no 2, pp. 432442, 2003.

  11. S. Joseph, M. Jacob, and S. Thomas, Oil palm fibre reinforced phenol formaldehyde composites: influence of fibre surface modifications on the mechanicalperformance, Applied Composite Materials,vol.7,no.5- 6,pp.295329,2000

Leave a Reply