- Open Access
- Total Downloads : 466
- Authors : N. Vijaya Kumar , V. Gowthami Priyanka, K. Srikanth
- Paper ID : IJERTV3IS111035
- Volume & Issue : Volume 03, Issue 11 (November 2014)
- Published (First Online): 26-11-2014
- ISSN (Online) : 2278-0181
- Publisher Name : IJERT
- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Evaluation of Wear Properties of Jute Reinforced Polypropylene Composites
N. Vijaya Kumar ¹, V. Gowthami Priyanka¹*, K. Srikanth²
¹Mechanical department, V.R.Siddhartha Engg College, Vijayawada
²Mechanical department, Mizan-Tepi University, Tepi, Ethiopia
Abstract:- The composite materials are manmade materials made of using diffent natural fibers(rice husk, carbon fiber, Glass fiber etc) which are used in variety of industrial applications. A relatively newer concept is to consider natural fiber as a reinforcing material. Both thermoplastic and thermoset matrices are used for development of natural fiber reinforced composites. Trying to achieve different tribological properties, the natural fiber, jute is reinforced in polypropylene composites. In the present work wear behaviour of polymer composites at different loads and at varied sliding velocities were studied. The composites were prepared using injection moulding machine by varying fiber weight percentage(5%, 7.5%, 10%, 12.5% and 15%). To study the wear behaviour of composites pin on disc wear testing machine was used. The coefficient of friction and wear loss are plotted against varied loads and at different sliding velocities(50cm/sec, 75cm/sec and 100cm/sec)
Keywords: Jute fibres (white jute, Corchorus capsularis), thermoplastic, tribological properties
-
INTRODUCTION
Today the worldwide researches are being motivated on the studies of using natural fibers as a reinforcement in polypropylene composites. The regulation of the government and ease of availability of natural fiber made the researches to try for fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. With low cost, ease of manufacturing and high mechanical and tibological properties, natural fibers represents a good alternative to the most of the common composites. With the help of composites large variety of materials can be made. By appropriate usage of these natural fibers physical and mechanical properties of the polypropylene materials will be enhanced.
Large variety of reports have been on the use of materials such as minerals and inorganic oxides (alumina and silica) mixed with polymers like polypropylene[1, 2] and polyethylene[3, 4]. Very few studies have been made to use natural fibers in preparing natural fiber reinforced polymer composite. To study the natural fiber reinforced composites for tribological applications many attempts have been made[5 6]. Hard powders are reinforced in epoxy matrix[7].Wear resistance of three types of composite materials containing epoxy resin matrix, epoxy filled with silica, epoxy filled with tungsten carbide powder have been investicated and observed that the matrix filled
with tungsten carbide powders have highest wear resistance. Flue dust is reinforced in unsaturated polyster and studied wear behaviour [8]
The wear resistence of material is an important requirement for many of the components. In the present work wear behaviour of jute reinforced polypropylene composites were studied.
1.1 Jute fiber
Jute which is known as golden fiber extracted from the bark of white jute plant (Corchorus capsularis) comes under the family malvacea. Jute fibres are composed primarily of the plant materials cellulose (major component of plant fibre) and lignin (major components of wood fibre). The cells of jute fiber vary from 0.050.19 inch in length and 20–22µ in thickness. Owing to the high price of composites, the user industries also demand a lower price for production of fiber components and at the same time improvement in quality. To achieve this natural fibers can be used[1-3]. In these categories jute is the vegetative natural fiber which yields a better tribological behaviour when it is reinforced with matrix polypropylene. The raw jute fiber is reinforced in polypropylene composites to enhance the tribological properties .
Fig 1(a): Jute fiber
Fig1(b): Natural fiber – Jute of 3mm length
-
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE
-
Materials used
The natural fiber Jute is gathered from Eluru. The jute fiber is made into 3-5mm size are reinforced into polypropylene to prepare the composites. Matrix material consist of polypropylene(H110MA) supplied by reliance industries limited, Hyderabad, India.
-
Fabrication of composite specimens
Proper proportion of fibres (0, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5 and 15%) by weight and polypropylene pallets were then properly mixed to get a homogeneous mixture. The mixture was then placed in a 2.5 tonne plastic hydraulic Injection Moulding Machine, Model JIM1 HDB, supplied by Texair Plastics Limited, Coimbatore as shown in fig2. At a temperature of 210 0 C and at pressure of 1100 kgf/cm2, all the specimens were developed for each weight friction of jute fiber composites. Percentage of fiber in the composite is maintained by its weight fraction.
rev/min with wear track diameter of 100 mm. Load is to be applied on pin (specimen) by dead weight through pulley string arrangement.
Fig 4 Wear test rig with data acquisition system
Fig 5: Wear test rig with specimen
2.2.Testing
Initial weight of the specimen is recorded with electronic digital balance weight scale. The sample is mounted on the arm of the tribometer. The load is applied by a pully arrangement on the sample. The loads may vary from 4kg , 6kg and 8kg . The motor which is provided with an electric transmits the energy in to rotary motion of the disc.The disc speed has to be changed to maintain required velocity.
Fig2: Injection moulding machine
Fig 3(a) Specimens Fig(b) After cutting to size
Wear test have been conducted in the Pin-on-disc type Friction and Wear monitor (DUCOM; TL20) with data acquisition system which was used to evaluate the wear behavior of the composites. It is versatile equipment designed to study wear under sliding condition only. Sliding generally occurs between a stationary specimen Pin and a rotating disc against hardened ground steel disc (En-
32) surface roughness (R a) 0.5 m . The disc rotates with the help of a D.C. motor; having speed range 0-2000
Initially 50cm/sec sliding velocity is selected & the disc is made to rotate for the sliding distance of 1500m. For every 3min of intervals the friction of specimen due to wear is recorded using data accusation system, and average value is taken for calculating coefficient of friction. The weight of the specimen is again recorded after the test was completed. The difference between the initial weight and the final weight gives weight loss. The same test will be carried out for 4kg, 6kg and 8kg loads and at different sliding velocities 50cm/sec, 75cm/sec and 100cm/sec. The testing process is continued for 75cm/sec and 100cm/sec sliding velocity also.
-
-
RESULTS & DISCUSSION
3.1 Wear
Table 1 shows the coefficient of friction of composite between the rotating disc and the stationary specimen in the case of jute reinforced polypropylene at different loads and at 50cm/sec sliding velocity. Fig 6 represents the graphical representation of results. From the graph it is observed that with the increase of load the coefficient of friction decreases. It also observed that the addition of filler increases the coefficient of friction up to 12.5%. Further addition of filler i.e at 15%, coefficient of friction decreases. Fig 7& 8 represents the coefficient of friction at 75cm/sec & 100cm/sec respectively. The coefficient of friction decreases with increase in load and increases with addition of filler at 75 cm/sec & 100cm/sec sliding velocities.
0% |
5% |
7.5% |
10% |
12.5% |
15% |
|
4kg |
0.375 21 |
0.3854 1 |
0.3988 4 |
0.4212 2 |
0.4412 5 |
0.4311 1 |
6kg |
0.351 21 |
0.3518 9 |
0.3644 5 |
0.3754 5 |
0.4012 1 |
0.3911 8 |
8kg |
0.332 54 |
0.3524 5 |
0.3655 4 |
0.3522 9 |
0.3978 5 |
0.3821 5 |
Table 1: coefficient of friction at different loads and at 50cm/sec sliding velocity
0% |
5% |
7.5% |
10% |
12.5% |
15% |
|
4kg |
0.38 145 |
0.3985 7 |
0.4125 1 |
0.4512 4 |
0.4615 4 |
0.4711 4 |
6kg |
0.36 454 |
0.3645 9 |
0.3651 2 |
0.3754 5 |
0.4132 5 |
0.4512 5 |
8kg |
0.33 468 |
0.3644 9 |
0.3655 4 |
0.3532 2 |
0.4012 1 |
0.4231 2 |
Table 2: coefficient of friction at different loads and at 75 cm/sec sliding velocity
0% |
5% |
7.5% |
10% |
12.5% |
15% |
|
4kg |
0.387 40 |
0.401 10 |
0.421 54 |
0.454 56 |
0.461 54 |
0.4724 5 |
6kg |
0.374 54 |
0.374 62 |
0.375 12 |
0.375 45 |
0.413 25 |
0.4615 4 |
8kg |
0.354 15 |
0.364 49 |
0.361 54 |
0.363 25 |
0.401 29 |
0.0.434 51 |
Table 3: coefficient of friction at different loads and at 100 cm/sec sliding velocity
4kg 6kg 8kg
0% 5% 7.50% 10% 12.50% 15%
% composition
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
1
0.8
coefficient of friction
Fig 8: coefficient of friction at different loads and at 100cm/sec sliding velocity
Table 4 shows the weight loss of composite without NaOH treatement between the rotating disc and the stationary specimen in the case of jute reinforced polypropylene at different loads and at 50cm/sec sliding velocity. The weight loss of composite at 50cm/sec sliding velocity shown in the graph which was plotted against the % composition and weight loss in grams. As the load increases weight loss decreases with the addition of filler material the weight loss increases gradually. The graph in fig 9 and fig10 shows the weight loss at 75cm/sec & 100cm/sec sliding velocities.
coefficient of
friction
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
4kg 6kg 8kg
0% 5% 7.50% 10% 12.50% 15%
% composition
0% |
5% |
7.5% |
10% |
12.5% |
15% |
|
4kg |
0.02 |
0.003 |
0.003 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
0.005 |
6kg |
0.001 |
0.002 |
0.002 |
0.003 |
0.003 |
0.004 |
8kg |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.001 |
0.002 |
0.002 |
0.003 |
Table 4: weight loss at different loads and at 50cm/sec sliding velocity
0% |
5% |
7.5% |
10% |
12.5% |
15% |
|
4kg |
0.004 |
0.004 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
0.006 |
0.006 |
6kg |
0.002 |
0.003 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
8kg |
0.002 |
0.002 |
0.003 |
0.003 |
0.003 |
0.004 |
Table 5: weight loss at different loads and at 75cm/sec sliding velocity
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
coefficient of
friction
Fig 6: coefficient of friction at different loads and at 50cm/sec sliding velocity
4kg 6kg 8kg
0% 5% 7.50% 10% 12.50% 15%
% composition
Fig 7: coefficient of friction at different loads and at 75cm/sec sliding velocity
0% |
5% |
7.5% |
10% |
12.5% |
15% |
|
4kg |
0.004 |
0.005 |
0.006 |
0.006 |
0.006 |
0.006 |
6kg |
0.004 |
0.003 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
8kg |
0.002 |
0.002 |
0.003 |
0.003 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
Table 6: weight loss at different loads and at 100cm/sec sliding velocity
0.01
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.002
-2.08E-1
4kg 6kg 8kg
0% 5% 7.50% 10% 12.50% 15%
% composition
weight loss in grams
Fig 9: weight loss at different loads and at 50cm/sec sliding velocity
weight loss in grams
0.01
6. REFERENCES
-
Mareri, P.,Bastide, S.,Binda, Nand crespy, A Mechanical Behaviour of polypropylene composites containing fine mineral filler: Effect of Filler Surface Treatment, vol. 58(6), pp:747-752,1998.
-
Jarvela , P. A. and Jar vela , P. K Multi Component Compounding of Polypropylene, Journal of Materials Science, vol. 31(14), pp 3853-3859,1996.
-
Rusu, M., Sofian, N. and Rusu, D., Mechanical and Thermal Properties of Zinc powder Filled High Density Polyehelene composites, polymer Testing, vol.20(44),pp 409-417,2001.
-
Barta, S., Bielek, J. and Dieska, P.,Study of Thermophysical and Mechanical Properties of Perticulate Composite Polyethelene CaCO3, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, vol.64980, pp 1525-1530, 1997.
-
P.R. Sadananda Rao, B. Suresha, G.Chandramohan, Influence
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.002
-2.08E-1
4kg 6kg 8kg
0% 5% 7.50% 10% 12.50% 15%
% composition
of SiC Filler on Mechanical and Tribological Behaviour of Glass Fabric Reinforced Epoxy Composite Systems, Journal of Reinforced plastics and composites, Vol. 26(6), pp.565-578, 2007.
-
Dipa Ray and R.Gnanamoorty, Friction and wear Behaviour of Vinelyster Resin Matrix Composites Filled with Fly Ash Particals, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, Vol 26(1), pp.5-12, 2007.
-
K.Friedrich, Z.Zhong and A.K.Schlarb, Effects of Various Fillers on the Sliding Wear of polymer composites, Composite Science and Technology, vol. 65(15-16) pp. 2329- 2343, 2005.
Fig 10: weight loss at different loads and at 75 cm/sec sliding velocity
weight loss in grams
p/>
0.01
-
N. Vijaya Kumar, M. M. M. Sarcar, M D. Inayatulla,
Evaluation of wear properties of flue dust reinforced particulate polymer composite. International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, Vol.5/ 04,pp 931-935, 2012.
0.008
0.006
0.004
0.002
-2.08E-1
4kg 6kg 8kg
0% 5% 7.50% 10% 12.50% 15%
% composition
Fig 11: weight loss at different loads and at 100 cm/sec sliding velocity
4. CONCLUSIONS
The conclusions has been given by conducting the above test and obtained graphs
-
Wear loss and coefficient of friction of jute reinforced composites decreases with increase in normal loads.
-
The coefficient of friction is increased up to 12.5% and then decreased with the addition of filler at sliding velocity of 50Cm/Sec.
-
The coefficient of friction is increased with the addition of filler at sliding velocity of 75Cm/Sec & 100 Cm/Sec.
-
The coefficient of friction is decreased with increase in normal loads. The coefficient of friction at 4Kg is 0.38541 at 6Kg is 0.35189 & at 8kg is 0.33254.
-
The weight loss is decreased with increase in sliding velocity and increased with increase in addition of filler material.
-